Does intel latest  mother boareds support for the Solaries 10 OS

Hello Friends this is Mr.MA.Prakash from India. I want to know intel latest mother boards not supporting solaries 10. i tried installing on some intel mother board numbers.
please suggest, which intel latest mother board support for the solaries 10 operating system.
thanking u.
ma.prakash.

I've had a fun time last week setting up an Intel MFSYS25 blade server and MF5000SI quad-core Xeon blades with Solaris 10.
I only had Solaris 10u4 (8/07) on hand, and it only worked in 32-bit mode (boot with kernel/unix explicitly specified, as in Safe mode descriptor).
However adding patches (back from Jan 2008) helped, and the system works fine in 64-bit mode.
I believe it should work with Solaris 10u5 since it includes these patches and newer ones, but haven't checked.

Similar Messages

  • What is the latest IOS release supported for the AP 1231 G?

    I have a few AP1231G models running IOS 12.3(4)JA. What is the current version supported? Can these models support both WEP and WPA configurations concurrently?

    c1200-k9w7-tar.123-8.JEB.tar
    yes they can support WEP and WPA

  • Why does MSI P4N have no support for Intel Preslor and Asus Nforce 4 does??

    Well as you've probably guessed it im new to the forums (howdy all  ). I currently own a MSI P4N diamond motherboard and quite frankly i most dissapointed with what has been called (by too many reviewers) a great board.
    First off i see very little changes taking place with each bios update, of which does not seem to happen regularly at all. (lets face it no board is perfect especially the Nforce 4 range from MSI for Intel CPU's).
    Secondly overclocking a Pentium D 830, which i may add should be capable of overclocking very well on an Intel Nforce board, can barley reach 3.4 Ghz (i know its mobo issue as the CPU is water cooled and overclocks to way beyond 3.7 on an 955X board).
    Thirdly the North bridge fan was poorly stuck on my motherboard in that on installing my motherboard into my case it popped off like the lid of a pringles tub by a slight movement of my hand  .
    And last but least... why does the MSI P4N diamond motherboard not support Intels latest 65nm CPU's when ASUS's and Gigabyte's Nforce 4 motherboards work well with the Pentium D and the 65nm range of Intel CPU's. Upon also reading about the next gen of Intel CPU's the Conroe, the 975X motherboards will support the future CPU via a bios update and it has been said that the same is likely to happen for the Nforce 4 range... however once again due to the lack of support for the MSI P4N diamond by MSI i believe all of us owners of this pathetic (an over statement really but its going to be that way if MSI keeps this up) over hyped motherboard will get a simple NO in the CPU support table for the next gen range of CPU's.   
     

    Where did you get the information regarding the MSI P4N diamond's release date?
    Are you in the United Kingdom? As it was released at the same time as the other Nforce 4 boards here (i was on the edge of my seat waiting for the Nforce boards to be released on overclockers.co.uk for sale) In the end though i bought my mothreboard in October, which is a good few weeks after release.
    Is there any kind of SLI 32 on MSI's plans? this is what worries me as they have made a move in the 975X department but have not made any further developmentes in the Nforce range for Intel, which to the average joe kind of indicates loss of intrest in this field from the company.
    I am overall pleased with my motherboard, when using a single core CPU, as overclocking was a sheer joy, but as soon as the dual core CPU went in the mothreboard behaves like a drunk man coming from a pub. I am aware that the Nforce 4 chipsets struggle with the dual core CPU's but surely Nvidia were informed by Intel about the dual core CPU's being released in the future.

  • Does the JRE 1.5 is supported for the WLS 8.1SP3 client

    Hi,
    Does the JRE 1.5 is supported for the WLS 8.1SP3 client
    Regards,
    Ahamad

    Hi,
    Does the JRE 1.5 is supported for the WLS 8.1SP3 client
    Regards,
    Ahamad

  • Does the IE CS6 version have Support for the Middle Eastern tool set? - left to right typing etc.

    Does the IE CS6 version have Support for the Middle Eastern tool set? - left to right typing etc.

    I assume IE means International English, as opposed to English North America (aka US English). There is Middle Eastern and Hebrew support via an English user interface for programs that support it such as InDesign.
    You can change the install language by launching the Adobe Application Manager and clicking on your name in the top left to bring up a context menu. From the menu select Preferences and then click the drop down for Languages. See the screen shot below:

  • Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version , SQL Server Extended Events , Optimizing Reading from XML column datatype

    Team , Thanks for looking into this  ..
    As a last resort on  optimizing my stored procedure ( Below ) i wanted to create a Selective XML index  ( Normal XML indexes doesn't seem to be improving performance as needed ) but i keep getting this error within my stored proc . Selective XML
    Index feature is not supported for the current database version.. How ever
    EXECUTE sys.sp_db_selective_xml_index; return 1 , stating Selective XML Indexes are enabled on my current database .
    Is there ANY alternative way i can optimize below stored proc ?
    Thanks in advance for your response(s) !
    /****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes] Script Date: 3/11/2015 3:10:42 PM ******/
    SET ANSI_NULLS ON
    GO
    SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
    GO
    -- EXEC [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
    ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
    AS
    BEGIN
    SET NOCOUNT ON --Does'nt have impact ( May be this wont on SQL Server Extended events session's being created on Server(s) , DB's )
    SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
    select getdate() as getdate_0
    DECLARE @XML XML , @Prev_Insertion_time DATETIME
    -- Staging Previous Load time for filtering purpose ( Performance optimize while on insert )
    SET @Prev_Insertion_time = (SELECT MAX(EE_Time_Stamp) FROM dbo.MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log ) -- Perf Optimize
    -- PRINT '1'
    CREATE TABLE #Temp
    EventName VARCHAR(100),
    Time_Stamp_EE DATETIME,
    ObjectName VARCHAR(100),
    ObjectType VARCHAR(100),
    DbName VARCHAR(100),
    ddl_Phase VARCHAR(50),
    ClientAppName VARCHAR(2000),
    ClientHostName VARCHAR(100),
    server_instance_name VARCHAR(100),
    ServerPrincipalName VARCHAR(100),
    nt_username varchar(100),
    SqlText NVARCHAR(MAX)
    CREATE TABLE #XML_Hold
    ID INT NOT NULL IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY , -- PK necessity for Indexing on XML Col
    BufferXml XML
    select getdate() as getdate_01
    INSERT INTO #XML_Hold (BufferXml)
    SELECT
    CAST(target_data AS XML) AS BufferXml -- Buffer Storage from SQL Extended Event(s) , Looks like there is a limitation with xml size ?? Need to re-search .
    FROM sys.dm_xe_session_targets xet
    INNER JOIN sys.dm_xe_sessions xes
    ON xes.address = xet.event_session_address
    WHERE xes.name = 'Capture DDL Schema Changes' --Ryelugu : 03/05/2015 Session being created withing SQL Server Extended Events
    --RETURN
    --SELECT * FROM #XML_Hold
    select getdate() as getdate_1
    -- 03/10/2015 RYelugu : Error while creating XML Index : Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version
    CREATE SELECTIVE XML INDEX SXI_TimeStamp ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml)
    FOR
    PathTimeStamp ='/RingBufferTarget/event/timestamp' AS XQUERY 'node()'
    --RETURN
    --CREATE PRIMARY XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index
    --SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_2
    -- RYelugu 03/10/2015 -Creating secondary XML index doesnt make significant improvement at Query Optimizer , Instead creation takes more time , Only primary should be good here
    --CREATE XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold_values] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index , --There should exists a Primary for a secondary creation
    --USING XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold]
    ---- FOR VALUE
    -- --FOR PROPERTY
    -- FOR PATH
    --SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_3
    --PRINT '2'
    -- RETURN
    SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_3
    INSERT INTO #Temp
    EventName ,
    Time_Stamp_EE ,
    ObjectName ,
    ObjectType,
    DbName ,
    ddl_Phase ,
    ClientAppName ,
    ClientHostName,
    server_instance_name,
    nt_username,
    ServerPrincipalName ,
    SqlText
    SELECT
    p.q.value('@name[1]','varchar(100)') AS eventname,
    p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') AS timestampvalue,
    p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS objectname,
    p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ObjectType,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="database_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS databasename,
    p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ddl_phase,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clientappname,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_hostname"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clienthostname,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_instance_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS server_instance_name,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="nt_username"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS nt_username,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_principal_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS serverprincipalname,
    p.q.value('(./action[@name="sql_text"]/value)[1]','Nvarchar(max)') AS sqltext
    FROM #XML_Hold
    CROSS APPLY BufferXml.nodes('/RingBufferTarget/event')p(q)
    WHERE -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Perf Optimize - Filtering the Buffered XML so as not to lookup at previoulsy loaded records into stage table
    p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') >= ISNULL(@Prev_Insertion_time ,p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime'))
    AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') ='Commit' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - Every Event records a begin version and a commit version into Buffer ( XML ) we need the committed version
    AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
    AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
    AND p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'Replication Monitor' --Ryelugu : 03/09/2015 We do not want any records being caprutred by Replication Monitor ??
    SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_4
    -- SELECT * FROM #TEMP
    -- SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #TEMP
    -- SELECT GETDATE()
    -- RETURN
    -- PRINT '3'
    --RETURN
    INSERT INTO [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
    [UserName]
    ,[DbName]
    ,[ObjectName]
    ,[client_app_name]
    ,[ClientHostName]
    ,[ServerName]
    ,[SQL_TEXT]
    ,[EE_Time_Stamp]
    ,[Event_Name]
    SELECT
    CASE WHEN T.nt_username IS NULL OR LEN(T.nt_username) = 0 THEN t.ServerPrincipalName
    ELSE T.nt_username
    END
    ,T.DbName
    ,T.objectname
    ,T.clientappname
    ,t.ClientHostName
    ,T.server_instance_name
    ,T.sqltext
    ,T.Time_Stamp_EE
    ,T.eventname
    FROM
    #TEMP T
    /** -- RYelugu 03/06/2015 - Filters are now being applied directly while retrieving records from BUFFER or on XML
    -- Ryelugu 03/15/2015 - More filters are likely to be added on further testing
    WHERE ddl_Phase ='Commit'
    AND ObjectType <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
    AND ObjectName NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
    AND T.Time_Stamp_EE >= @Prev_Insertion_time --Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Performance Optimize
    AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log] MN
    WHERE MN.[ServerName] = T.server_instance_name -- Ryelugu Server Name needes to be added on to to xml ( Events in session )
    AND MN.[DbName] = T.DbName
    AND MN.[Event_Name] = T.EventName
    AND MN.[ObjectName]= T.ObjectName
    AND MN.[EE_Time_Stamp] = T.Time_Stamp_EE
    AND MN.[SQL_TEXT] =T.SqlText -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 This is a comparision Metric as well , But needs to decide on
    -- Peformance Factor here , Will take advise from Lance if comparision on varchar(max) is a vital idea
    --SELECT GETDATE()
    --PRINT '4'
    --RETURN
    SELECT
    top 100
    [EE_Time_Stamp]
    ,[ServerName]
    ,[DbName]
    ,[Event_Name]
    ,[ObjectName]
    ,[UserName]
    ,[SQL_TEXT]
    ,[client_app_name]
    ,[Created_Date]
    ,[ClientHostName]
    FROM
    [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
    ORDER BY [EE_Time_Stamp] desc
    -- select getdate()
    -- ** DELETE EVENTS after logging into Physical table
    -- NEED TO Identify if this @XML can be updated into physical system table such that previously loaded events are left untoched
    -- SET @XML.modify('delete /event/class/.[@timestamp="2015-03-06T13:01:19.020Z"]')
    -- SELECT @XML
    SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_5
    END
    GO
    Rajkumar Yelugu

    @@Version : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Microsoft SQL Server 2012 - 11.0.5058.0 (X64)
        May 14 2014 18:34:29
        Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
        Developer Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.2 <X64> (Build 9200: ) (Hypervisor)
    (1 row(s) affected)
    Compatibility level is set to 110 .
    One of the limitation states - XML columns with a depth of more than 128 nested nodes
    How do i verify this ? Thanks .
    Rajkumar Yelugu

  • How to fix The SIM card inserted in this iPhone does not appear to be supported. The SIM card that you currently have installed in this iPhone is from a carrier that is not supported under the activation policy that is currently assigned by the activation

    The SIM card inserted in this iPhone does not appear to be supported.
    The SIM card that you currently have installed in this iPhone is from a carrier that is not supported under the activation policy that is currently assigned by the activation server. This is not a hardware issue with the iPhone. Please insert another SIM card from a supported carrier or request that this iPhone be unlocked by your carrier. Please contact Apple for more information.

    Or if you've recently got the phone unlocked then you'll need to connect it to  itunes and then do a fresh restore to unlock it ,although for most users simply connecting to itunes for few seconds did the trick.

  • TS2529 The SIM card inserted in this iPhone does not appear to be supported. The SIM card that you currently have installed in this iPhone is from a carrier that is not supported under the activation policy that is currently assigned by the activation ser

    The SIM card inserted in this iPhone does not appear to be supported.
    The SIM card that you currently have installed in this iPhone is from a carrier that is not supported under the activation policy that is currently assigned by the activation server. This is not a hardware issue with the iPhone. Please insert another SIM card from a supported carrier or request that this iPhone be unlocked by your carrier. Please contact Apple for more information
    what can in do?

    Well unfortunatly that advice does not always work. I bought a unlocked iphone4  from apple several years ago and went to att on a no contract basis. Six months later the phone crashed while updating the operating system. Apple replaced the phone with a new one. All is fine till I got a iphone5 and gave te phone to my cousin. The phone is now locked to att but att says the IMEI number is not a valid ATT IMEI and therfore cant unlock it. Apple says there is nothing They can or are willing to do so now I am stuck for a 600.00 phone that can't be used.
    If anyoun knows a way naround this situation mI would appreciate a heads up.

  • Implementing Single Sign-On support for the Oracle E-Business suite

    Implement Single Sign-On support for the Oracle E-Business suite
    I want implement Single Sign-On support for the Oracle E-Business suite.
    Operationg System : linux/Solaris
    Oracle E-Business suite : 11.5.10
    Oracle Application Server : 10gAS(latest availble)
    Type of integration : SSO and OID with 11i
    No third party SSO or LDAP
    Qusetions
    1.If my SSO Server is down can i login to applications(11i) using normal mode(default login http://servername.xxxx.com:8000/).
    2. Is it possible to have appilications (11i) in Linux/Solaris and 10gAS in windows.
    Please answer...
    NOTE:
    I am following Oracle METALINK Doc.Id 233436.1 and 261914.1.
    Thank you.
    MARK

    You couldn't login into server But You can use the following login
    http://servername.xxxx.com:8000/AppsLocalLogin.jsp
    For this you need to enable the Appslocallogin Profile option

  • [Consolidation-Locked] Please add RAW support for the Nikon D600 to Lightroom as soon as possible!

    My Fair Adobe,
    Please add RAW support for the Nikon D600 to Lightroom as soon as possible!
    ViewNX lets me get to the images, but come on!!! I know Lightroom, and you, ViewNX, are no Lightroom.
    Yes, I see everyone else ASKING for D600 support. I'm here to beg for it! Don't make me wait much longer!
    Message title was edited by: Brett N
    Message title was edited by: Brett N

    Rob, my reading of your site is that this plug-in copies settings from raw to jpeg, does it work the other way around as well?
    Rob Cole wrote:
    One of the great things about the new 0-based defaults and linear tone curve is:
    You can develop the jpegs now, in Lightroom, and then sync the settings to the raws later (e.g. using RawPlusJpeg), and provided you select a matching camera profile, they will look almost the same (white balance won't translate over, but everything else will, more or less). Beware lens corrections applied to the raws might alter the registration of precision local adjustments.
    Note: I recommend shooting with ADL off in order for this to work better, and consider turning sharpening off in camera as well, and noise reduction and everything else to whatever extent is possible.
    Rob

  • Tether support for the Nikon D750 in lightroom 5

    Will there be tether support for the Nikon D750 in Lightroom 5

    You are absolutely correct Lightroom does not have tether support for the new Nikon D750. see the list of supported cameras.
    Tethered camera support in Lightroom
    Nikon need to provide the required sdk info for the camera to enable Adobe to work on adding tether support.

  • Help! Some features of Mac OS X Mavericks are not supported for the disk "Macintosh HD"

    I'm on a MacBook 13" mid 2010, OS X 10.7.5, I want to upgrade to OS X Mavericks. I have searched around for a few days, I find people with the same problem but can't really get the solution for it. I prefer not to reinstall OS X, I want to upgrade. I don't have boot camp or something just a 250 GB HD.
    Well, while I'm trying to upgrade from the download from Apps Store, I open the installer, press continue then accepts the Terms.. then select Macintosh HD and click install, then an warning message shows up "Some features of Mac OS X Mavericks are not supported for the disk "Macintosh HD"
    As I've read the article that is included in the waring message i did try to install anyway because it say that I would be fine, but when i did try to install the installer starts and after like 3 minutes a window appears, Install Failed.
    I've even try to make a installer on USB, both with the command in terminal and with Diskmaker, but it does not help.
    It seems impossible to upgrade. Please Help me.

    First, see the heading "What to do if the installer warns that no Recovery System can be created" in this support article. If you use Boot Camp, back up and delete the Windows partition using Boot Camp Assistant. Try the installation again.

  • Just bought a Nikon d750 and confused about adobe LR4 and PS6 support for the RAW files. I have DNG 8.7 but wondering if LR and PS will import direct soon Thanks for any advice

    Just bought a Nikon d750 and confused about adobe LR4 and PS6 support for the RAW files. I have DNG 8.7 but wondering if LR and PS will import direct soon Thanks for any advice

    Support for the Nikon D750 was introduced in the latest version of LR 5.7 and ACR 8.7 on Novemder 18th 2014.
    Further updates to LR 4 were stopped when LR 5 was released on June 9th 2013. No further updates for bug fixes and new camera support.
    Nada, LR 4 will never support Nikon D750. The Nikon D750 was introduced into the market in September 2014 some 15 months after further development of LR 4 was discontinued.
    You can use the Adobe DNG program (free download for the package) to convert the Nef (raw) files from your Nikon D750 to the Adobe DNG format which will permit you to import those into LR 4. This is the crutch provided by Adobe to allow for the processing of raw files with outdated versions of LR and ACR.
    You can also update the ACR plugin for PS CS6 to version 8.7 which can also work with the raw files from the D750. For direct support in Lightroom you will need to upgrade (paid) to version 5.7.

  • Is there support for the GraphicsFmt object in FrameMaker 11 ExtendScript?

    I was reading the FDK documentation for FrameMaker 11 and I see that support has been added for Object formats using FO_GraphicsFmt.
    Is there support for the GraphicsFmt object in FrameMaker 11 ExtendScript?
    If not, when will it be added?
    Another question: Will the ExtendScript documentation ever be improved?

    Stuart,
    I am pretty sure you can use the object from ExtendScript. With the FDK documentation you should be able to guess the property names in ExtendScript, but the easiest way is to use a small test document and write a small script to get at the GraphicsFmt object. Set a breakpoint and use the Data Browser and/or JavaScript Console to see how FM uses the object.
    As for better ExtendScript documentation: I am working on a website (www.progframe.com) that will feature better documentation, combining the current docs with stuff picked up from the FDK reference and test scripts. It will also have tutorials for newbie scripters. If Adobe does not put an effort into the docs, I might as well do it and possibly pick up some scripting jobs that way. I am planning to launch the website early next year and keeping it up to date so that ExtendScript info is immediately available when a new FM version hits the market.
    Kind regards
    Jang

  • Will Verizon offer any thing to iPhone 4 users since Apple will stop releasing update and support for the device?

    Apple recent stated they will no longer offer any support for the iPhone 4, no more updates, apps will stop working with the advancement of software updates. over all by the end of the year the phone will be almost completely phased out. Does Verizon have any type of plan for their current iphone 4 device users?

    Verizon has nothing to do with Apple updates.
    It is much like Microsoft who phased out support updates to Win 31, Windows 95,98,ME and now Windows XP.
    You must deal with Apple http://www.apple.com/support
    Good Luck

Maybe you are looking for