Does LR/Mogrify work in Lightroom 5?

I've installed the LR/Mogrify plugin successfully, but when I try to export an image using the Mogrify watermarking options (specifically the burn-in of filename) I get an error message:
An internal error has occurred: LrCatalog:withCatalogDo was marked deprecated in Lightroom 2.0 and is not supported as of Lightroom 3.0. This call is no longer needed.
A follow up question would be why does LR5 still not support this basic watermarking option?

Thanks Rob, that sorted me out.  I went to http://photographers-toolbox.com/index.php thinking that would be the latest version, but that was LR1 and outdated I guess.  
A quick search of the Adobe site found this link:  http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/exchange/index.cfm?event=extensionDetail&extid=1822523, where I was able to download LR2 and that worked fine with Lightroom 5.
Thanks for the advice.

Similar Messages

  • Does the new version of lightroom work with an old CS5 photoshop?

    Does the new version of Lightroom work with an old CS5 photoshop?

    Yes - they will work together.
    However, the Camera Raw versions will not match - meaning you may have to render your file into a tiff to bake-in your LR Settings before passing the file to PS CS5,

  • ITunes, Remote.app v2: Does v2 still work in iOS7 or will I be automatically updated to version 3? (Plus v3 and iTunes issues)

    Remote.app (version 2): Does it still work in iOS7 or will I be automatically updated to version 3?
    That is basically the main question I've come to ask (with some side commentary in parenthesis below).
    After trying out iTunes Remote App version 3, I saw that it scrambles playlists (such as Recently Purchased), which makes my playlists worthless. For example, using Remote.app, it's no longer possible to simply play the songs you bought over the last week at the iTunes Store using the Recenlhy Purchased Playlist. Since I buy a lot of music through the iTunes Store, I naturally want to listen to what I just paid for, just as I could using Remote.app version 2.
    But it's not just the Recenly Purchased playlist, it's all my playlists. Through the last decade, day in and day out, I've carefully orgnized hundreds of playlists that I've very crafted, song by song like old mix tape casettes.
    They payoff for this work has been enormous. Since starting with mp2 in 1995, then mp3 and continuing through to the thousands of dollars I've spent purchasing songs through the iTunes Store and tens of thousands on iPods, iPhones, iPads, and computers—I've been able to make music match whatever mood or music was juuust right for the moment, making for great moments and memories with friends and families. For some artists, I always want to hear their latest songs first or I want to to hear top rates songs first. Other lists are about creating a particular mood for just about any occasion. I can even shift the mood in the room with the right music list. It's really been fantastic the memories and moments I've been able to set the tone with the right song, and most of this has been not the song itself, but the flow of music I've created by orgnizing music lists. That's a lot of work I've invested. So the order of the songs matters a lot to me, especially the very first song that starts that list. That's the song I want to hear first, not somewhere in the middle.
    As of Remote.app version 3, these carefully crafted songlists are scrambled, making the App worthless. When I first noticed this I couldn't believe it, must be a bug. Nope, no bug, by design I found out. It's like when Lucy pulls the football away. It's mean spirited to take back features you've sold and promoted and people have grown to rely on in the workflow of their lives. So I downgraded back to Remote.app version 2.
    ((Actually, they're not really technically scrambled, they're actually presented in alphabertical order, which I think is really the same thing to me. Think about it: listening to an artists work alphabetically by title is really the most random and completely scrambled way to listen to their music. Or if you don't want to listen to them alphabetically, you can have them shuffled. Those are now the only two choices. Either way, the lists are jumbled, and like iTunes 11, several of the most powerful features have been taken away. In this case the exact thing that's missing is that the iTunes Remote no longer reflects the sort order of iTunes playlists.
    I don't know if this is a quiet, update-by-update shift away from our playlists and towards iTunes Radio or not, but I would think so. Why else would you make it less powerful. To quote Merlin Mann Apple tends to "fire a warning shot" feature wise before taking something away. The Finder has gotten less and less powerful in finding files and folders by their name and size through the last decade.
    I'm now noticing the same thing with iTunes, it's becoming more difficult to find the currently playing song. In iTunes 10, Go to Current Song would open the folder containing the list of the currently playing song, highlight and move that list to the top of the left column and then highlight that song. In iTunes 11, Go to Current Song will only highlight the folder that contains that song and nothing more. At that point you're on your own to hunt town the currently playing song. This feature has been broken—on purpose I suspect.))
    SO—I don't want to be forced into Remote.app version 3 and have my playlists scrambled on my iPhone and iPad. Is there anyone who knows the answer from first hand experience?
    If customer loyalty is as important to Apple as it should be taking away features in iTunes and Remote app will only drive old customers away.
    Thanks!!
    David

    I like that I would be able to maintain my iPhoto library data for Faces and Places in Aperture, but am concerned that when the iPhoto library is "upgraded" for Aperture, and I decide I don't really need that program, the upgraded library won't work with iPhoto anymore.
    The iPhoto library isn't changed in any way by Aperture. Aperture will import the Library and you can choose to copy the files to the Aperture Library or reference them within iPhoto. As long as you don't delete files from the iPhoto Library via Aperture (which you could do if you choose to Reference) there is no impact on iPhoto
    Will I still be able to use iPhoto to access and organize my library, or will it be forever converted for use with Aperture?
    They are completely different libraries.
    Recently, iPhoto bugs make Events show up multiple times in iTunes when syncing for iPhone and iPad.
    Fixed in the 9.1.3 update.
    Will I find a better user experience with Aperture, or does it also use the single file library and suffer the same struggles iPhoto users have been seeing lately?
    Like iphoto, Aperture can use the "single file library" or it can use a Referenced Library (just like iphoto can). Note that using a Referenced Library offers not a whit more in terms of features or capabilities. It's file storage plain and simple. Nothing more.
    No you won't see the "same struggles iPhoto users have been seeing..." because Aperture is an entirely different allication.
    But you my see Aperture or Lightroom struggles
    Regards
    TD

  • LR4.2 and "Do not import selected duplicates" does not always work.

    LR4.2 and "Do not import selected duplicates" does not always work. Running a Mac, 10.6.8, I am cleaning up hard drives, organizing old files. There are times lightroom 4.2 (and before) does not recognize already imported raws and does not gray them out. These are backed up cards and folders of of raw images. Why is the "do not import selected duplicates" check box not working???!!!

    There's a known (and old) bug when duplicate identification fails on photos
    that have been imported from another catalog.
    Sent from phone.

  • Edit In doesn't work in Lightroom 5.5 from Photoshop CC 2014

    Edit In doesn't work in Lightroom 5.7.1 from Photoshop CC 2014 even after uninstalling and reinstalling both LR and PS (2014.2.2). Suggestions?

    Thanks for your response. When you choose "edit in PS" in LR, PS will open but the file from LR never opens. I had this problem before and uninstalling LR and PS then reinstalling fixed the problem. The problem has returned and the above solution does not work. I even used "Adobe CC Cleaner Tool" from Adobe to now avail. Opening PS first does not help.
    Also the Automate->Photmerge function no longer works. Maybe Adobe will be able to help on when tech support is available on Monday.
    On 3/14/15 2:55 PM, Shootistbond007 wrote:

  • Can't dump cards and work in Lightroom simultaneously

    Ever since installing Snow Leopard I can't dump cards from my reader and have Lightroom running.  If I'm working in Lightroom and I put a card in the reader, the card doesn't show up.  I have to quit Lightroom in order to dump cards and I'd like to be working in Lightroom while dumping cards.  I need to multitask.  Does anyone know how to fix this?

    Do you mean:
    (1) That the LR import process doesn't start automatically when you insert a card, or
    (2) If you insert a card and start the LR import process manually (via the Import button) that the card doesn't show up in the available sources?
    If it's (1) then check your preferences general settings...be sure "Show import dialog..." is checked.
    If it's (2) then is the card mounted as a drive on your Mac? If not it possibly indicates some sort of hardware issue.
    It's also confusing what you mean by "I have to quit Lightroom in order to dump cards...". This implies the card is mounted as a drive. Where the's destination you are "dumping" the card? And what do you do after the card is "dumped".
    What version of Lightroom and OS X are you running?

  • Does anyone know why my lightroom adjustment sliders do not change the photo?

    Does anyone know why my lightroom adjustment sliders do not respond or do anything to change my photo. The sliders are not working?

    Have you:
    Restarted Lightroom?
    Rebooted the computer?
    Reset your preferences file? Resetting (or 'Trashing') the Lightroom Preferences file - Lightroom Forums

  • Why does abode not work on my galaxy tab2

    Why does abode not work on my galaxy tab 2?

    The games dont load they just say I need to update to the latest version or say that it is not compaterble with it.

  • Why does sound not work on my Mac Air?

    Why does sound not work on my Mac Air --all setting seem okay. OSX 10.9.2 operating systyem.

    Open System Preferences > Sound > Output
    Make sure the coorect output devices is selected and the Mute button is not checked.

  • I added a contact to my iphone 4s and when I did a sync manually it is not showing up on my MAC in address book - please help....I checked off sync all contacts in iTunes  - does it only work one way from computer to phone?

    I added a contact to my iphone 4s and when I did a sync manually it is not showing up on my MAC in address book - please help....I checked off sync all contacts in iTunes  - does it only work one way from computer to phone?

    Is it because the new itunes looks different.
    View > Show Sidebar
    Then it should work just the same as on your old computer.

  • How do you connect your photoshop elements on your computer to your account online? and how do you create a customized url? how does the gallery work and how do you access it? i have trouble signing in on my program from my computer to connect to the onli

    how do you connect your photoshop elements on your computer to your account online? and how do you create a customized url? how does the gallery work and how do you access it? i have trouble signing in on my program from my computer to connect to the online photoshop, and I really want to create my own customized url and post photos to my gallery and share them with the world, family, and friends, but i need help because i can't figure how to do any of this, would really appreciate feedback and assistance, thanks, - claire conlon

    To add to sig's reply, "calibrating" does not calibrate Lithiu-Ion batteries, it calibrates the charge reporting circuitry.  If you look at the effect of deep discharging Lithium-Ion batteries in the data from the independent test group, Battery University, you will see that doing so shortens the life of the battery significantly. It looks like an optimum balance between use and life is at a discharge level of 50%.

  • Why does Adobe sendnow work and the newest and greatest Adobe Send does not work?

    Why does Adobe sendnow work and the newest and greatest Adobe Send does not work? I wasted about 8 hours on trying to get Adobe Send to upload 269 files that amounted to 469MB. When it did not work I made a zip file and after a lot of wasted run time that did not work. The first situation gives little indication of when a file is loaded compared to Adobe SendNow. In both cases with Send it failed with a message like only the first 50 can be loaded. When I went and looked none of them had been loaded. With the zip file (I wanted to hide the individual files so they would not be counted) it appeared to work but very slowly and finally said it was done and I went and looked and it had done anything for oever 2 hours except a false "I'm runninng" indication.
    Thus, I took a chance with Adobe SendNow and it works great. It never gave me a limit on the amount of files nor on the size of the complete job. It shows me one file at a time when it has finished with the file uploading it. SendNow has never given me any problems.
    Why woiuld you want to change the program from SendNow to Send without the newest program being the best, fastest, user friendly program of the two? It just doesn't make sense to me. I suggest that Adobe keep SendNow working until Send is fixed. I would also suggest that SendNow and how it looks be kept, called Send, then modify Send one thing at a time until you get it to the point you need it to be for Acrobat. I have heard nothing good and now I have experienced it that Send is a piece of junk. I wasted most of my work day on giving Adobe the benefit of the doubt to find out I made a very bad decision to trust Adobe to make good decisions on the transfer of a function to another place .... both Adobe's responsibility.without making it painless for your customers that totally rely on you. Don't throw away customer confidence as it is very hard to get it back.

    Funny how you answer to "troll". (What's your handle on AT&T forums?)
    Yep! Verizon living up to it's contractual obligations by not releasing updates. Caveat emptor!
    I think there are some reasonable expectations here to keep customer's happy. When one carrier offers upgrades there is an expectation the same will happen across all the carriers. We have seen that except Big Red.
    Verizon could have said the update is in MS court months ago and stilled the voice of the disgruntled, or at least redirected it, but instead chose to be silent. Not for market share but for partial blame I think.
    We will have to agree to disagree since you only see Terms & Conditions and I, see customer satisfaction.

  • When I am in safari, I try to bookmark a web page and it is not doing it, it worked before I updated to the ios6 version

    When I am in safari, I try to bookmark a web page and it is not doing it, it worked before I updated to the ios6 version, does any one know why ? It pulls up the screen to save it but then it is not showing up on the bookmark drop down menu, it continues to show the standard google,iPad user guide, yahoo....

    hello sofg777, when you're at a page you want to print try to press ctrl+P and select a different printer than the Microsoft XPS Document Writer which seems to be set as your default printer in firefox at the moment.

  • Does creative cloud work with windows 8

    does creative clould work with windows 8?. I see windows 7 as a minimum requirement with no mention of windows 8

    lewis0,
    Welcome to Adobe Community .
    Minimum requirements means that you have to have these as the minimum configuration to install the Adobe Products . You can surely go ahead and install the product on a windows 8 PC and it should work fine.
    Regards,
    Kartikay Sharma

  • To what extent does auto-syncing work...?

    I have researched this but can not find the answer anywhere.
    I need to know to what extent does auto-syncing work?
    I started my library quite some time ago, and I didn't want to use the auto-sync feature. My library has grown very large and to be honest, I still wouldn't mind doing the manual syncing if my behavior and/or needs hadn't changed. However, I am now going back and adding artwork and making some slight modifications to several songs. Overall, through one type of change or another, this will affect the vast majority of my library. What I need to know is if I were to make info-related changes, will the syncing make the modifications on the ipod, or will they be ignored?
    For instance, here are some of the types of changes that I am beginning to make:
    - Adding Artwork.
    - Changing a track name from "Living in a box" to "Livin' in a box"
    - Adding info to the various fields such as album author, comments.
    - Modifying a track name from "Love is a Battlefield" to "Love Is A Battlefield"
    - Changing an album name from "Miami Vice Soundtrack" to "Miami Vice [Soundtrack]" or "Shrek (Soundtrack)" to "Shrek [Soundtrack]"
    - Updating an artist's name from "Jackson Five" to "Jackson 5"
    Any insights would be most appreciative.
    Bill

    While in Manual sync, any changes you make in iTunes will not get put onto the iPod until you drag the songs over.
    Any changes you make on the iPod thru iTunes will not be on the original in iTunes.
    Any rating,
    Any reason you are using manual sync instead of Auto sync?
    If you don't want (or can't) to put everything in iTunes on the iPod, use selected playlists and manage those playlists.
    When you make changes to the songs in iTunes, they will get updated onto the iPod automatically.

Maybe you are looking for