Does LR5 FULLY support Phase One P65+ Raw files?

Hello,
I know the files are "supported", and will open. However, the quality is quite bad and nowhere near as good as opening the same file in Capture One. Also, long exposure shots see the "black frame" totally discarded and the images are extremely noisy. Phase One support say it's because LR and CS6 are only using a portion of the Raw file and to ask Adobe.
I would migrate to LR5 today if there were a fix or an explanation. Capture One forkflow doesn't suit me. However, the quality is just too bad to accept.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Enrico.

The link below will take you to the official Adobe "Bug report and feature request forum". This forum is a "user to user forum" so your comments will not necessarily be seen by the people who matter most.
http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family

Similar Messages

  • Does Lightroom 3 support Panasonic DMC FZ200 RAW files?

    Does Lightroom 3 support Panasonic DMC FZ200 RAW files?  I think the update for LR 4.2 does.  But I still have LR 3 and do not wish to upgrade right now.

    Of course not.  The camera was announced 8 months after the last version of LR 3 came out.
    You could use the free DNG converter.

  • Does Elements 10 support the Nikon D3200 RAW Files?

    Does Elements 10 support the Nikon D3200 RAW Files?

    Not yet. You need to wait for the next update. It's already been added to CS6 and Lightroom 4; so it should follow soon.
    If you can't wait and convert from NEF to DNG you can use PSE10 but always keep your originals as back-up and incase you need to use Nikon software.

  • Does Fireworks 8 support Canon's .CR2 raw files

    Does anyone know if Fireworks 8 supports Canon's .CR2 raw
    files? I tried to open some .CR2 files in Fireworks 8 and it did
    not recognize them...can I update or something so it will recognize
    them or do I have to revert back to shooting in jpg?

    > Does anyone know if Fireworks 8 supports Canon's .CR2
    raw files?
    >
    see if this free converter will turn it into a format
    fireworks will open?
    http://www.macworld.com/news/2007/12/06/raw/index.php
    a photoshop plugin-
    http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/cameraraw.html
    and a standalone converter
    http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/
    Alan
    Adobe Community Expert, dreamweaver
    http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/

  • Does elements 11 support fuji x-t1 raw file?

    Without changing to dng?

    Unfortunately, one needs to use the adobe dng converter for camera raw files from cameras supported after camera raw 7.4 in pse 11.
    Camera raw 7.4 is the newest camera raw plugin that works with pse 11.
    Camera Raw plug-in | Supported cameras
    Camera Raw-compatible Adobe applications

  • Does Lightroom 4 support Panasonic Lumex FZ150 raw files

    Just purchased this camera, and use primarily Lightroom to edit.  When downloading my images, although I shot it RAW (which is why I bought this camera) it converted it to JPEG's.  I also just upgraded to Lightroom 4, which will arrive shortly.  Does anyone know whether Lightroom 4 supports RAW in this camera?  Thanks.

    Thanks Lee. I went to the link but am still a bit confused.  Camera Raw update seems to apply to Photoshop Elements 10, where I have Elements 9.  I didn't know what I should download.  When I import the RAW images from my Nikon D90, I don't have to do anything different.   And the Lightroom 3.6 does not say anything about the Panasonic Lumix.  Any further clarification would be most appreciated.  Also, the question was not answered, if you know, whether Lightroom 4 will be supporting my new camera. 

  • Does  PSE 12 and PSE 13 support Panasonic Lumix Fz200 raw files?

    Does PSE 12 and PSE 13 support Panasonic Lumix Fz200 raw files?

    Yes.
    See that FAQ: Photoshop Elements FAQ List
    In that list you find:
    FAQ: Will Photoshop Elements work with my camera, or Why won't my raw files open?
    And in that paper, you find two links, one for supported cameras:
    https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
    and ACR versions compatible with different Elements versions:
    https://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/camera-raw-compatible-applications.html

  • Does LPX fully support retina displays or is there still pixelation issues?

    I've been using LP9 for a while now and recently upgraded to the retina display macbook pro which displayed quite a lot of pixelation in LP9. Does LPX fully support retina screens?

    There is an Apple document which specifies that key 1 should be used for WEP configuration and recommends using WPA or WPA2 for wireless security: iPad: Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections. It's too bad that you didn't find this when you had problems.
    The iPad will work with WPA-TKIP or WPA2-AES. AES provides much stronger security. There is much misinformation on the Internet on this subject.
    WEP is insecure, obsolete and has been deprecated by the IEEE since 2004. There is no chance that Apple or anyone else will waste resources on enhancing WEP implementations. For more information on the tattered history and vulnerabilities of WEP read this: WEP - Wired Equivalent Privacy
    I'm glad to hear that you got your system working. Your post was well-written and might help someone else.

  • Does Firefox fully support Windows 8.1 64-bit?

    It appears from the web that the current Firefox browser does not fully support Windows 8.1 64-bit. Is an updated version planned that will fully support Windows 8.1 64-bit, and if so when is the expected release?

    the current version is firefox 26 - 27 is going to be released this week. if you download either of those, you'll just get the normal firefox browser on desktop as you're used to. firefox 28 which is also going to be released as beta this week will include a (minimalist) touch-optimized version of firefox for the windows metro ui...
    https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/channel/

  • I want to know if Lightroom 5 (version 5.7) supports the conversion of raw files from the Fuji X-T1 micro 4/3 camera system???

    I am considering purchasing the Fuji X-T1 Micro 4/3 camera.
    However before I do I need to know if Lightroom 5 version 5.7 supports the conversion of raw files from this camera!!!????
    Can anyone please let me know if Lightroom does convert raw files from the Fuji X-T1 please???
    Many thanks,
    Connie

    Dear Adobe Support Staff!
    Many thanks for getting back to me re Lightroom and the Fuji X-T1.
    I am now wondering if Lightroom supports the Olympus OMD-E-M1 raw files??? Will Lightroom 5.7 convert raw files from this micro 4/3 camera??
    This is the one I'm now intending to buy.
    Many thanks for getting back to me!!!
    Cheers
    Sent from my iPhone

  • Why does iPhoto 9.4.3 not recognise RAW files from a Pentax K3 camera?

    Why does iPhoto 9.4.3 not recognise RAW files from a Pentax K3 camera? It does from a K7.

    Because it requires Mavericks - http://support.apple.com/kb/ht5955
    OS X Mavericks provides system-level support for digital camera RAW formats from the following cameras.
    Supported by Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 5.04*
    Fujifilm X-E2
    Fujifilm X-T1
    Nikon D3300
    Nikon 1 AW1
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC-GM1
    Pentax K-3
    LN

  • Does Aperture always apply white balance to RAW files?

    Hi Aperture users,
    I have been an Aperture user for many years.  Aperture handles the white balance of my Canon XTi RAW files just as I want it to: it interprets the RAW data by applying the white balance selected at the time of the photo.  I.e., when Aperture decodes the RAW file, it makes it look more-or-less like the in-camera JPG with respect to the white balance.
    However, in the past several months, many well-known contributors of this forum have stated "RAW is RAW -- Aperture will not apply any camera settings."  This statement was made in response to many "novice" questions about why a RAW photo in Aperture did not look anything like the JPG from the camera.
    So, my questions:
    Does anyone have a camera to whose RAW files Aperture does not apply in-camera white balance settings?
    Does everyone else agree that this exception to "RAW is RAW" is acceptable?
    thanks,
    nathan

    Hi Nathan -- I was hoping someone much more informed than me would weigh in with some engineering truth.  All I got on offer is the thin gruel of observation.
    Mr Endo wrote:
    So, my questions:
    Does anyone have a camera to whose RAW files Aperture does not apply in-camera white balance settings?
    Does everyone else agree that this exception to "RAW is RAW" is acceptable?
    1. I don't.  RAW is sensor data.  Most cameras record the White Balance camera setting as a metadata tag attached to the RAW data  (The WB has no effect at all on the captured data.)  Most RAW converters use this setting as the default WB.  Some RAW converters perform "colorimetric interpretation" -- they basically compare the data captured to a generic color space and assign a WB.  (This is, I assume, the same thing a camera set to "Auto WB" does.  My camera is superb at assigning a WB for any mixed scene; it's repeatably bad, though, whenever the actual scene is truly colored (meaning "away from average").)  In both cases -- 1. using the attached-to-the-RAW-data WB, and 2. analyzing the captured data to intelligently predict the WB -- a WB is applied to the RAW data.  It has to be, in order to produce an image from the data.
    2.  The problem here isn't that this is an exception -- it's that different people mean different things when they say "RAW".  The RAW data is RAW data.  As above, the WB setting has no effect on it.  But the image derived from the data -- any image produced from the data -- much have a WB set (and, for human use, a tone-curve applied).  Some people mistaken think that RAW is an image format, or that the image produced by the RAW converter is a "RAW" image.  It is not.  RAW data must be converted to an image format in order to be displayed as an image.  The conversion must apply a WB.
    I have found it useful (though perhaps mistaken) to conceive of my data-gathering to picture-making as following these steps:
    . Capture a pattern of light.  This is just data.
    . Convert the data to an image.  RAW conversion done by Aperture.  (NB: the settings for this can be changed.)
    . Adjust the image to my artistic satisfaction
    . Convert the adjusted image to an image format file
    . Publish the image-format file in one or two now standard forms: to be viewed on a computer monitor, or as a print.
    I mention only because at some point I consciously added the "Convert data to image" step in order to better grasp the process.  RAW data is RAW data -- but that step identifies an intermediate that many overlook.  At that step the information recorded along with the RAW data and stored in the RAW file is applied to the RAW data.
    To me, "RAW is RAW" is correct.  "Aperture will not apply any camera settings," is wrong.
    I am happy for any clarifications or corrections.

  • Why does not Lightroom allow me to import RAW files from my Canon 5D Mark III?

    Why does not Lightroom allow me to import RAW files from my Canon 5D Mark III?
    Error message that it does not support cr. file

    Which version of Lightroom?
    As Hal points out, if it's pre v 4.1, you can't expect an old version of the software to know what to do with a camera that didn't even exist when the software was released.
    Given how many times a day this same issue comes up, maybe it's time Adobe changed the error message to something like "your camera is too old to be supported by this version of Lightroom. Please upgrade" or similar... 

  • Proper support for Fuji EXR Raw Files

    There is still no proper support for Fuji  EXR Raw files.  On any Fuji X-series camera, the in-camera raw processing, including specifying options always outputs a far superior image that Adobe Camera Raw 6.  I've been using an X100 for some time now, and have really gathered some great images with it. But Adobe Camera Raw fails miserably to understand how to process these files.
    This is more of a complaint and feature request than a question, because I already know the answer. Adobe has not worked close enough, or at all, with Fuji to develop a Raw processor for the EXR pixel layout.
    The EXR pixel arrangement offers new possibilities, especially the ability to take an HDR image of a moving subject, and without a tripod. The elimination of the low-pass filter allows for more sharpness, and finally the noise pattern is much more "film-like".
    I've been using Adobe Photoshop for processing images for years, but have no compelling reason to upgrade without a proper conversion for Fuji RAW files.
    Adobe: Please work with Fuji to bring world-class support for EXR Raw images.
    Thank you,
    William

    Good day!
    Adobe has not worked close enough, or at all, with Fuji to develop a Raw processor for the EXR pixel layout.
    There seems to be a reason why Adobe has to reverse engineer RAW formats – the camera manufacturers don’t want their customers to use Adobe (and other) software to process their RAW files. (If their proprietary software gets better results then that’s understandable, but for how long are they going to support their own software?)
    Now maybe Fuji is more cooperative than others, but do you know that for certain?
    I've been using Adobe Photoshop for processing images for years, but have no compelling reason to upgrade without a proper conversion for Fuji RAW files.
    If the new/improved features of Photoshop CS6 have no significance for the way you process, manage, edit and touch-up photographs feel free to stick with whatever version of Photoshop you use currently, but be aware that hardware/OS changes on your side may some day make that version inoperable on your set-up.
    Also the upgrade path has been cut down to one version, if I understand correctly.
    Anyway, this is a beginners Forum, feature requests might be better posted over at
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family
    Regards,
    Pfaffenbichler

  • What version of LR supports Lumix DMC LX7 RAW files? do I need to install Camera RAW plug-in?

    What version of LR supports Lumix DMC LX7 RAW files? do I need to install Camera RAW plug-in?

    The Camera Raw plugin is for Photoshop and Photoshop Elements.
    The functionality provided by Camera Raw is already built in to Lightroom.
    The Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 was first supported in Lightroom 4.2 so Lightroom 5 will be fine.
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html

Maybe you are looking for