Does muse have cross browser compatibility?

Which browsers and versions is MUSE compatible with?

Please check: http://helpx.adobe.com/muse/faq.html
The supported versions are listed and updated periodically as and when there is a change after a new Muse release.
Cheers,
Vikas

Similar Messages

  • JSF Cross Browser Compatibility

    In reading about JSF I find no promise for cross browser compatibility. Am I to assume that this has been missed because
    i. JSF is a specification and not an implementation and I should be looking for the implementation to make that promise.
    ii. it's basically to hard to promise this.
    iii. I didn't look hard enough.
    I am guessing it's a (i) with the likely hood of (ii) to follow. But I would be interested on any feed back that anyone cares to add. For example, a implementation that is trying to promise this.

    In my opinion, the JSF specification (or better, any specification) can only refer to other specifications, but never to a concrete software product. Consider a sentence like:
            JSF 1.0 is compatible with IEWhat could that mean? Some possibilities:
    (1)     As it happened, until now, we did not stumble over a
            faces application that broke when run on our Faces
            reference implementation (version 1_1_01) in a
            WSAD 5.0 container in combination with IE 5.5
            with patch 12345 on Windows NT4 SP6 patch 98765.
            (To breake means to produce a result not legitimized
            by the spec, or to produce no result when one is
            expected, at least not in a reasonable time.
            Breakdowns caused by power failure or other
            reasons outside the scope of the spec to be ignored)Well, not worth any further comment.
    (2)     Implementations of JSF 1.0 Spec will not brake
            on any faces application when run in a
            WSAD 5.0 container in combination with IE 5.5
            with patch 12345 on Windows NT4 SP6 patch 98765
            (To breake means ...)That is ok... if you have just this combination of components and will never change. Keep in mind that (2) does not promise
    anything if you use IE5.5 patch 12345a (and the saying is, there have been several patches to IE ;-)
    (3)     Implementations of JSF 1.0 Spec will not brake
            on any faces application when run in any container
            in combination with IE 5.5
            with patch 12345 on Windows NT4 SP6 patch 98765.
            (To breake means ...)Same as (2)
    (4)     Implementations of JSF 1.0 Spec will not brake
            on any faces application when run in any container
            in combination with IE 6.0 on any platform with
            any patches.
            (To breake means ...)Maybe what is intended, just impossible to promise. First, such a bold statement about some software can not be proven.
    Second, even if you have gained good confidence by thorow testing, who knows which future changes Microsoft will apply to IE 6.0 (via patches, which offen not only correct bugs, but also introduce new and maybe incompatible features)
    (5)     Implementations of JSF 1.0 Spec will not brake
            on any faces application when run in any JSP 1.2
            or higher container in combination any broser
            which supports:
               - HTML 4.0.1
               - JavaScript 1.3
               - CSS 1.0
            where IE 6.0 is a browser which supports these
            three standards on any platform with any patches.
            (To breake means ...)It's getting better. But why, for heavens sake, should a JSF specification make a statement about the compliance of IE with HTML 4.0.1, JavaScript 1.3 and CSS 1.0? I think it would be the job of Microsoft to declare the compatibilty of their products with standards (if any applies, whatsoever).
    Therefore, lets get rid of these and we have:
    (6)     Implementations of JSF 1.0 Spec will not brake
            on any faces application when run in any JSP 1.2
            or higher container in combination any broser
            which supports:
               - HTML 4.0.1
               - JavaScript 1.3
               - CSS 1.0
            (To breake means ...)Nearly finished, just a little bit wordy. It is (nearly) obvious what 'to breake' means. And that it is common wisdom that software breakes, not some specification (Or, as Bertrand Meyer put it, Bubbles don crash. Specifications may be contradictory or fail to describe an algorithm, but never crash). Common wisdom removed gives:
    (7)     Implementations of JSF 1.0 need a JSP 1.2 container
            and a browser capable of HTML 4.0.1, JavaScript 1.3
            and CSS 1.0That's it. Specs exist for two reasons. First, to be discussed and thought about. Second, to be implemented. (To the supporters of agile methods: of course you can reverse the sequence ;-). Therefore, specs should be as short and concise as possible, omitting any useless blabla. If the specs are sufficently precise and of moderate complexity, we can even try to prove the compatibility of the specifications. 'COMPATIBLE WITH IE' is advertisement, not tech talk.
    Conclusion: Mixing up specifications and implementaions is generally a bad thing. Exception: All sentences where a specification and a implementation are mentioned together should have the form:
             Implementation X does [not] conform to specification Y
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I have a follow up question, just inspired by yours. It does not especially concern JSF, but web pages in general.
    Some time ago, I stumbled over quite a few web sites with big red eye catchers:
    OPTIMIZED FOR INTERNET EXPLORER!!!
    And really, they did not look good on Netscape Navigator. Now, my question is, what do you think when you hit such a page? My first thoughts (it's long ago) have been:
        - Oh, nice designers. They really care for the majority of people,
          my neighbor uses an IE.
        - They just skiped the work for other browsers and sell this as an
          optimization. And I didn't get it. Very clever.
        - Poor Guys. Probably they had no other browser at hand.
        - Obviously they had publish this tremendously important information
          under pressure, no time to also optimize for others browsers.Wolfgang Oellinger

  • Does Muse have an app or can they create one so I can edit my Muse pages from my phone on the go? This would be awesome!!

    I have seen this a lot with other web design sites. They have an app for mobile devices to edit their sites. Does Muse have this? If not, do you know if they are working on this for later? This would be a great tool!

    No...
    this application is far too advanced/"heavy" for an app. I couldn't even imagine getting anything done on a Muse app!
    : 0

  • My tools feature in firefox does not have private browsing

    My motherboard was recently changed.previous to that my desktop had the private browsing feature in firefox.but after the change, the tools feature does not have private browsing settings. it only has "clear private data" setting.now how do i create a private bbrowsing setting?'''

    You currently seem to be running a Firefox 3.0.6 version according to the user agent and that version doesn't have Private Browsing mode.
    You should update as soon as possible to a currently supported release version.
    You can find the latest Firefox release in all languages and for all Operating Systems here:
    *Firefox 10.0.x: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all.html
    *Firefox 3.6.x: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all-older.html
    <!-- [[/questions/918509]] -->

  • Does Muse have the equivalent of a table?

    I need to create a grid (with borders) of pictures and text, just like the old html tables.  Does Muse have a widget or feature that creates the equivalent of a simple table?  I would like to be able to specify the number of rows and columns and get the equivalent of a table.  I would prefer to avoid doing this one div cell at a time or via html.  Is there anything built into Muse to do this?  If not, what is the best design alternative?

    You will probably do better asking in the Muse forum here:
    Help with using Adobe Muse CC
    --OB

  • Does muse have a vimeo gallery widget like youtube gallery widget for multiple videos

    Does Muse have a gallery widget for Vimeo like the Youtube gallery widget to play multiple videos on the same page

    Answered on your another thread Does vimeo have a vimeo gallery widget like youtube gallery widget

  • What about cross browser compatibility?

    HI
    I was searching cross browser and platform compatibility
    matrix.
    Can any one give me info on this or point me a link?
    Thank You,
    Suketu Vyas
    Rich Internet Application Architect
    Macromedia Certified professional
    http://www.suketuvyas.com

    Hi Suketu,
    We don't have a matrix like that yet.
    We have been testing on the latest browsers on both
    platforms. Obviously, we are shooting to support all major browsers
    correctly. We will note browser specific issues that we and other
    users find on the Spry wiki.
    I note in my Web Photo Gallery article that Safari has a bug
    where doesn't handle XML nodes named <image> correctly.
    If you find any browser specific bugs, please let us know!
    Thanks for your help,
    Donald Booth
    Adobe Spry Team

  • Does Muse have a widget that will allow users to book tables and/or pay for take-away?

    I have already used Muse to set up my portfolio. Now a new challenge - I need to create a website for mobile / tablet users that permits browsing dishes, booking tables and maybe a widget that allows them to pay on-line before collection? I've scanned through the tutorials but not found anything relating to e-economy pages.

    Hi,
    No such widget in Muse, but you will need a third party service to achieve this, where you will store the data, like who booked the table, for how long etc. You can embed them in Muse and it should work. An example is given below
    Form Templates
    Do let me know if you have any question.

  • Muse Rectangle cross browser gradient color issue

    I am using a standard rectangle to show the effect on brouser and this is what is happening on cross border platform
    Google Chrome/IE
    Firefox/IE (Compatible Mode)
    Orignal

    Can you provide a URL to the page so I can have a look?
    -j

  • Does muse have a forum that can be hosted with adobe catalyst?

    I need to build a website with a forum included.  Does Adobe has a forum that could be included with MUSE and hosted in adobe catalyst?
    Please let me know
    Alex.Corey@AdobeelainefinnellforumnotifierNewsgroup_UserDebbieclawsonmghalpinjwarren

    Hi Alex,
    Please check this video on how to integrate business catalyst features in Muse, Adding Business Catalyst features to your Muse sites | Learn Business Catalyst | Adobe TV
    Regarding the forums in Muse, I think it is a good idea that can be added to the ideas section here, Ideas for features in Adobe Muse
    - Abhishek Maurya

  • Does Muse have a FAQ widget/module?

    I have a great looking website with Adobe Muse, but the client also wants a faq widget in the site. With BC (which is the host) it is easy to add faq. But can I do that with Muse?
    Thank you

    Yes, you can do it with Muse and BC. Just takes a bit of trickery and of course upgrading to marketing plan in BC.
    It can't really be explained how step by step but if I get time today I will try and do a video on that. It is really quite simple if you know Business Catalyst.

  • Cross Browser Compatibility

    Hi everyone,
    Can anyone point me in the direction of a good resource which
    perhaps lists browser display differences? I'm sure it can't be
    trial and error, there must be a guide as to what browser supports
    what :)
    Anywhere online or actual books, i'm open to all suggestions
    Many thanks in advance

    Minimize your need to know this by always coding with
    standards in mind.
    Use a doctype that is consistent with your coding ability,
    and make sure
    that you understand what those standards are.
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    ==================
    "simbull" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:fiep9j$ftq$[email protected]..
    > Hi everyone,
    >
    > Can anyone point me in the direction of a good resource
    which perhaps
    > lists
    > browser display differences? I'm sure it can't be trial
    and error, there
    > must
    > be a guide as to what browser supports what :)
    >
    > Anywhere online or actual books, i'm open to all
    suggestions
    >
    > Many thanks in advance
    >

  • Cross-platform compatibility?

    Not addressed in product specs:
    How does Muse handle cross-platform compatibility?
    Does it use HTML5 features?
    How does it handle audio and video?
    Can it generate a 'functioning' contact form?

    Muse handles output for most desktop browsers well.
    Muse only produces HTML5.
    Muse does not import audio or video files unless you paste code into this 'codeless' design tool.
    Muse only produces client side javascript. It offers no server side scripting (contact forms, comment areas, user account registration, password protection, e-commerce). If you want that, you'll need to paste code into this "codeless" design tool.
    It is possible to find more mature web design programs.

  • The wifi available in the building I live in requires you to accept a user agreement each time you log on (obviously Apple TV does not have the option to display a browser webpage, so is there any other way to connect my Apple TV to the wifi??

    Hi guys,
    I cannot get my Apple TV to connect to the only available wifi connection in my building.
    Basically when I log on to it with other devices you have to type in a password (like all wifi connections) but then it opens a browser window with a user agreement that you have to accept each time you log on. Since Apple TV does not have a browser option I can't log it on.
    Is there anyway around this issue???
    Or is there anyway to get content from my iPad to display on my Apple TV without an Internet connection on the Apple TV???
    Thanks guys!

    Is there anyway around this issue???
    Or is there anyway to get content from my iPad to display on my Apple TV without an Internet connection on the Apple TV???
    Unfortunately not.

  • Cross browser differences

    The jsp pages in our project work fine in IE browser. But in Netscape browsers, the alignment is all messed up. We are at the end of the project and we dont have time to change all the jsp pages. I was told that there is some kind of javascript to handle situations like this. Including that javascript in the jsp pages essentially solves this problem. I was wondering if this is true? Please share your knowledge on this topic. I really appreciate your help.
    Thanks,
    Ravi.

    Hi,
    it depends on how you have structured your code. If you have done a css for the layout, you can know what browser is in use and switch to a specific external css. Something like:
    if (document.layers)
    document.write("<LINK HREF='netscape.css' REL='stylesheet' TYPE='text/css'>")
    else if (document.all)
    document.write("<LINK HREF='stile.css' REL='stylesheet' TYPE='text/css'>")
    else if (!document.all && document.getElementById)
    document.write("<LINK HREF='mz.css' REL='stylesheet' TYPE='text/css'>")
    else
    document.write("<LINK HREF='xx.css' REL='stylesheet' TYPE='text/css'>")
    and so on...
    Sometimes the problem is in using special costruc that works fine only in IE (for example): this is quite more complicated to solve, becouse you have to find a different solution.
    There isn't any "general" solution to cross browser compatibility; usually it is a good idea to start developing in order to achieve it and not to demand it in a late stage.

Maybe you are looking for