Does Neo2 Plat bios 1.4 official contain all the "updates" in the beta bios 1.36/1.37

given the minimal info on change logs in the beta bios for the Neo2 plat..does the official 1.4 bios contain the updated in 1.36b and 1.37b
thus is 1.4 bios the best bios...

1.4 is the latest official bios. Normally new bioses are cumulative and include the previous fixes.
Working fixes of bios 1.36 and 1.37 sould even be included in version 1.3, because this is the final version of the 1.3x betas.

Similar Messages

I cannot make the update of the iphone any more because the preceding owner made the jailbreak blow my telephone does not want to be re-ignited more and N accepts any restoration which must I make? thank you m to help

I cannot make the update of the iphone any more because the preceding owner made the jailbreak blow my telephone does not want to be re-ignited more and does not accept any restoration which must I make? thank you to help me

To put your iPhone back in jail do a restore.
This will put iPhone back into factory condition and you can get your updates (assuming you want the updates).

Does Windows SP2 contain all prior updates?

Today is the big day. The last computer component comes in so that I can start the processing of becoming a first time builder.
Microsoft sent me SP2 on cd. After I install win xp from the CD (I presume SP1 is on the installation cd), do I need to go on line and run windows update before I install SP2 or does SP2 contain all the prior updates?
Thanks.

It includes all the major critical updates so you should install it first and then go on line for any others.

The update to the upgrade server runs on but does not connect for this new upgrade

I was notified that there is a newer version 14 from existing 13.01. Several files were downloaded and installed, then it said to re-start. Okay so far, then Mozilla re-starts on ver 13 and another window opens saying that it is connecting to server, but it never does. Keeps running. Still on ver 13.01, not 14

Sometimes the updater messes up, requiring you to download the Firefox update manually. Go to [http://www.getfirefox.com www.getfirefox.com], and download and install Firefox 14.0.1

HP Support Assisstant - why does it not recommend all driver updates for the model?

I use HP Support Assisstant, and it is configured to update my machine weekly. I have had video problems and now have audio problems. How come certain KEY drivers are not coming through on Support Assistant automatically? What's the purpose of having a weekly update if it's not consistent and I have to do research on drivers anyway?

OK, what operating system are you using? When the printer reportedly goes offline, does it still have a valid IP address from the router (print a Wireless Network Test from the front of the printer - make sure the IP is not 169.254.x.x nor 0.0.0.0)?
If it still has a valid IP, then the issue is not with the printer, but more likely the router or operating system. If you are using Windows, download and run this utility: http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/softwareDownloadIndex?softwareitem=mp-104282-2&cc=us&dlc=en&lc=en...
What does it say?
Say thanks by clicking "Kudos" "thumbs up" in the post that helped you.
I am employed by HP

The itunes store app on the iphone 4s does not appear on the iphone at all so i can't purchase any media. I have done all the updates on the iphone and in itunes. This happened right after i did the latest iphone update. HOW CAN I GET THE ITUNES BACK?

after doing all the latest updates to both my iphone 4s and itunes the itunes store app on the iphone just dissapeared. Now i can't purchase any media. How can i get itunes store app back on my iphone?

If you can't find it on any of your homescreens or app folders, and you can't find it via the spotlight search screen (swipe your first home screen to the right), then is it hidden by Settings > General > Restrictions > iTunes being set 'off' ?

How do I update my adobe flahplayer OS X 10.6.8? It does not update when I install the update from the adobe site

When I try to update my adobe flashplayer from the adobe website it does not show updated and I still get the error that my adobe is out of date.

Try un-installing and then re-installing.
Adobe Flash Uninstaller
Adobe Flash Player

I have just had to replace my hard drive on my mac book pro and can now not sync my iphone which contains all my information onto the new drive, any ideas?

I had to replace my hard drive on my mac book pro as it had died. Since getting laptop repaired I have been trying to sync my iphone with the new hard drive but it will not allow me to do this without first wanting to wipe the phone clean and put info on the hard drive onto the phone, of course there is no info on the hard drive at all. Any help will be greatly recieved.

https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-3141

Why is it that my ipod does not sign in auto matically after it has been updated to the new ios 6.01 software?nothin seems to be working,its ridiculous.all my stuff has jus vanished.even the the icloud backup doesnt function.

is this the biggest **** baox ever?

You have given us no details about your problem so we cannot help.

K8N NEO2 plat. - RAID0 not working.

Looking for help with RAID setup. I have two identical drives, WD 250GB 16MB cache, 7200rpm etc. Never setup a hardware before and would like to use raid0.
I followed the guide almost to the T, with the exception of the type of RAID.
http://forums.pcper.com/showthread.php?t=340514
I installed them in slots 3 and 4
I went into the BIOS and enables SATA and RAID for 3&4.
The details are:
SATA 3/4 DMA transfer Enabled
IDE RAID Enabled
SATA3 RAID Enabled
SATA4 RAID Enabled
SATA3/4 Enabled
Went into the BIOS utility and set them up for striping. F10
RAID utility
Boot: yes ID: 1 Status: healthy Stripe 64k Striping width 2
Started the windows install and pressed F6 for RAID drivers and here is when the fun starts.
Using the first driver resulted in two separate disks shown in the partition config menu. When the computer attempted to copy the raid files it could not find the nvidiaraid.sys on the disk (and it is there).
Using the second driver resulted in the computer hanging just be for the windows partition utility starts. I left it for 15 minutes just in case it was slow and nothing happened. I had to physically power down the computer.
Using both drivers resulted in the computer hanging just be for the windows partition utility starts. I left it for 15 minutes just in case it was slow and nothing happened. I had to physically power down the computer. Same as above.
Using no drivers resulted in two separate disks shown in the partition config menu. The computer copied the windows files and rebooted. It hung at boot reporting no disk type error.
I am lost and am looking for advice on how to proceed. My next course of action is to try updating the raid floppy disk that came with the box.

This may shed som lights of what nvraid & nvide drivers to use on the F6 portion of install.
http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=51140&st=0&p=356029&#entry356029
Quote:
Important requirements:
You only will succeed with the integration of the nForce SataRaid drivers, if you have
- an up-to-date mainboard BIOS (actual nVRaid drivers may need a Raid Bios v. 4.84 or higher)
- a stable system (proper RAM modules and stable BIOS settings)
- an original or perfectly created Windows XP SP2, Windows 2000 SP4 or Windows Server 2003 SP1 CD
- a proper working IDE-connected CD or DVD drive
- an enabled ACPI power management (within BIOS)
Tips:
You can see the nVRaid BIOS version of your system on the second boot screen. If you can't get a Raid BIOS version v. 4.84 or higher unless having flashed the latest mainboard BIOS, you might get problems with the integration of the latest nForce SataRaid drivers. In this case you should take the nForce driver package 6.53.
The successful integration of the nForce SataRaid drivers into a bootable OS CD postulates the presence of the latest available Service Pack (SP) of the used OS. If your OS CD does not contain any SP, you should integrate the latest SP as first step, when you are going to create your nLited CD with integrated nForce SataRaid drivers. Don't try to slipstream SP2 into an XP SP1 CD. In this case it's better to take an original OS CD without any SP as source for slipstreaming SP2 and the nForce SataRaid drivers. Otherwise you may get problems during the installation of the nLited CD.
It is a good idea to unplug all unnecessary extern hardware devices during the install of the OS with integrated nVRaid drivers.
If you have hard disk drives outside your RAID array, you may get the problem, that the MS Setup routine tries to install the master boot record (MBR) on that non-RAID device, although you have set the RAID array as first bootable hard disk drive within BIOS. The only possibility to prevent this is to unplug these non-RAID hdd's during the installation of the OS. After the successful installation they can be reconnected without any problems.
Windows XP:
Mainboards with an nForce4 (Ultra, AMD, AMD/Intel SLIx16) SataRaid system: For the integration of the SataRaid drivers I propose to take the official 32-bit NVIDIA nForce chipset driver package 6.85. Download it from here and unzip the package. Within the IDE\WinXP directory you will find a subfolder named LEGACY. As this subfolder contains all necessary files for the later integration of the SataRaid drivers, any further preparations of this package are dispensable. The SataRaid drivers of the 6.85 package are fully compatible with nForce2, nForce3 and most of the different nForce4 chipsets.
Notice: It is no problem to take the LEGACY subfolder of any other nForce chipset driver package, if you think, that the 6.85 package is not the best for your special nForce chipset. You may find an other suitable package on NVIDIA's homepage, but be aware of the presence of a LEGACY subfolder. If you absolutely want to integrate SataRaid drivers off such a package without a LEGACY subfolder, you may use the SATARAID subfolder for later SataRaid driver integration, but you have to copy at least the following needed, but missing files into the SATARAID subfolder prior to the integration: NVCOI.DLL (you find it within the SATA_IDE subfolder) and NVATABUS.INF (take the one from the LEGACY subfolder off the package 6.70 or 6.85)
Mainboards with an nVRaid BIOS version lower than 4.84: Users should try to update their mainboard BIOS (as the nVRaid BIOS is a part of it), before they try to integrate the above mentioned SataRaid drivers. If no BIOS update with an integrated nVRaid BIOS v. 4.84 or higher is available, you probably have to take the older nForce SataRaid drivers off the package 6.53 (downloadable here). Just unzip the package. The later integration is easy, because the IDE\WinXP directory of this package does not contain any driver subfolder. So all needed drivers and files for the later SataRaid driver integration are laying within the IDE\WinXP directory.

Looking for cheapest ram to go with the k8n neo2 plat

looking for the cheapest compatable 1GB dc kit for the msi k8n neo2 plat
any suggestions

Yea,
I gotta give a shout out for the Corsair Value Select series also. I ran it for years in cheap systems I built for friends without any problems at all. Newegg has it pretty cheap (under $100 bucks).
I think their cheapest starts at 79$ bucks for DDR400
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820145440
good luck
doggy

Updated: 08/05/07 - MSI P965 Neo-F Latest Official and BETA BIOS!

Dear All,
I've got an info from one of MSI Engineers for the DDR 800MHz RAMs support for MSI P965 Neo-F mainboard.
There'll be a BIOS v1.40 that enables the mainboard to support 1GB DDR 800MHz modules.
Another upcoming BIOS v1.50 will fixed the 2GB limitation on the board, allowing the board to run up to 4GB of DDR 800MHz RAMs.
I'll update this thread on any upcoming details that I can get.
I can't confirm when the BIOS will be officially released so please kindly have the patience to wait.
Best Regards,
Joe Chow.
Added by Maesus:
beta BIOS 1.62 http://rapidshare.de/files/33337455/7235v162.rar.html (link provided by BOSSKILLER)
Updated by NovJoe:
MSI P965 Neo Beta BIOS ver. 1.67(Date: 09/08/06) :
http://rapidshare.de/files/34366659/7235v167.rar.html (link provided by BOSSKILLER)
Updated by NovJoe
MSI P965 Neo Beta BIOS ver. 1.69(Date: 06/10/06)
http://rapidshare.de/files/35481679/W7235IMS.169.html (Link provided by dryhte)
Updated by NovJoe
MSI P965 Neo Beta BIOS ver. 1.69(Date: 06/10/06)
http://members.cox.net/garikfox/W723516F.rar (Link provided by garikfox)
Updated by NovJoe
MSI P965 Neo BIOS v1.6 - Official MSI Released BIOS (Date: 17/12/06)
http://www.msi.com.tw/program/support/download/dld/spt_dld_file_record.php?folder=1&kind=1&name=7235v16.zip
Updated by NovJoe
MSI P965 Neo Beta BIOS ver. 1.6H (Date: 03/02/07)
http://necromanthus.com/docs/MSI-P965-Neo.html (Link provided by hexxer)
Update by NovJoe
MSI P965 Neo BIOS v1.8 - Official MSI Released BIOS
http://global.msi.com.tw/index.php?func=downloaddetail&type=bios&maincat_no=1&prod_no=265
Update by NovJoe
MSI P965 Neo Beta BIOS ver. 1.91 (Date: 08/05/07)
http://www.mydatabus.com/public/dejanos/z/W7235IMS.rar (Link provided by dejanos)
Update by NovJoe
MSI P965 Neo BIOS v1.9 - Official MSI Released BIOS (Date: 11/05/2007)
http://global.msi.com.tw/index.php?func=downloadfile&dno=5550&type=bios

heres some picture proof for you guys just so nobody doubts me
E6300 can scream pretty good at 2.8Ghz
http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/1691/400mhzfsbcb0.jpg CPUID
http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/1047/400mhzfsb2qx2.jpg CPUID
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/2179/3dmark0513krv2.jpg 3DMark05
http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/347/holycrapqf1.jpg Aquamark 3
http://img452.imageshack.us/img452/5691/untitled1fk7.jpg SuperPI

Satellite 1410-604 - BIOS update Incorrect BIOS update in the web?

Hi there again!
Now with a new and weird matter.
We all know that old say... "If it is not break, don't fix it". And if you put it into more informatic terms, "specially if it is a BIOS".
Yes, we all know that the BIOS is something quite dellitate to handle. For some reason we normally feel like if we were handling something like nitro-glycerine, or some radioactive product. And this is because we all know what is being put in risk in that moment: our (or sometimes others) computer, the full system could end as dead as some pieces of metal, plastic, and wires.
Well. I passed through all of that more than ten times in my life, and only once it went wrong. But since that old motherboard was already dead, It was not important. But I allways was EXTREMELY care. I allways cross checked everything before doing anything, allways got a backup and a way to restore that backup... and allways did this in COMPAQ systems, that were prepared that way. Updating a BIOS was just about preparing a disk, turn on the PC with the disk in the diskette drive, and wait. And if you didn't like the results, you simply click "return to previus BIOS" and that was it... very nice. And easy.
Few days ago, a friend brought me a Toshiba Satellite 1410-604 to solve some issues that were driving him crazy. After removing an expired Norton Internet Security, install avast and scan, I found more than one hundred files infected with a wide variety of virus, malware, trojans, and whatever you could imagine. Avast removed them all, but the remains of the operating system was so unstable that we decide to format and install from scratch.
I asked for the restoration disks, that obviously he don't have because they were lost in one of his movings. After we got the confirmation from Toshiba reps that there are no recovery disk available for this model, because it is too old, we decided to install from scratch like any other normal PC, and resigned to loose some of the utilities that come with that CDs and that are not available for download in the website.
I downloaded all of the software available for this model, including two BIOS updates. (Actually only one update, but in two versions: Windows and Traditional), and prepared a CD with all the drivers and programs just like if it were a brand new system install. And everything went very well, no problems at all. Until we got to the Wireless LAN card, but that is another issue that is already solved (the mini PCI card for the WLAN does not support WEP or WAP encription, and it is not possible to connect to any wireless LAN encripted).
At this point, and when I started configuring and enabling PCMCIA devices, and USB devices (this computer only supports USB 1.1 not 2.0) I discovered this text in the Toshiba Website:
"This Bios Update adds increased functionality to your system.
(BIOS is an acronym for Basic Input and Output System. This program is stored in a Read-Only Memory chip on the motherboard.
When the computer powers up, the BIOS is launched to perform various start-up functions.)
For detailed update information please refer to Toshiba BIOS-Update Information"
(you can find this here:
[http://eu.computers.toshiba-europe.com/innovation/download_drivers_bios.jsp?service=EU] you have to look for:
Archive
Satellite
Satellite 14xx
Satellite 1410-604
PS141E
Quite specific. Isn't it?)
According to the information in that same website, the BIOS available fits the following models:
"Satellite 2410-414, Satellite 1410, Satellite 1410-654S, Satellite 1410-814, Satellite 2410-303, Satellite 2410-304S, Satellite 1410-354, Satellite 2410-601, Satellite 1410-401, {color:#ff0000}*Satellite 1410-604*{color}, Satellite 2410-404, Satellite 1410-301, Satellite 1410-304, Satellite 2410-S403, Satellite Pro 2100, Satellite 1410-S203, Satellite 2410-304, Satellite 1410-554, Satellite 1410-S102, Satellite 1410-354E, Satellite 2410-703, Satellite 1410-303, Satellite 2410-S203, Satellite 1410-801, Satellite 2410-603, Satellite 1410-902, Satellite 1410-313, Satellite 1410-802, Satellite 1410-714, Satellite 2410-354, Satellite 2410-514, Satellite 1410-614, Satellite 1410-704, Satellite 2410-515, Satellite 2410-504, Satellite 2410-702, Satellite 1410-S103"
Yes... it's there!
Now, when you go to the "Toshiba BIOS-Update Information", you get:
"FAQ Ref.: TRO0000000b07
A BIOS update is a {color:#ff0000}*relatively simple operation and can be carried out by most competent computer users*{color}. All BIOS upgrades can be obtained from "BIOS Update" Download Section click here..
Note: The BIOS files are machine specific so the correct BIOS for your machine must be used."
Please note that Toshiba does not disencourage the handling of BIOS, on the contrary: they even encourage people to do so. This is not necessary bad, but at the same time they encourage people to 'play around' with such a delicate matter, at the end of that same page, in little letters they say:
"Toshiba provides this information "as is" {color:#ff0000}*without warranty of any kind*{color}, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Toshiba shall not be responsible for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of the information provided. {color:#ff0000}*Toshiba is not liable for any damage caused by the use of any information provided, including information that is incomplete or incorrect*{color}."
This should trigger yellow alarms in our minds.
+"Human error is inherent to humans, and it is not possible to erradicate. It will allways appear, sooner or later" (Prof. James Reason).+
And finally I made the mistake. Even though I read that warning, I remembered all those successfull BIOS update with COMPAQ, and relied in Toshiba. That update was available there, and Toshiba was telling me that it was for this computer. Great!
So finally I unplugged all devices (USB), removed the PCMCIA (WLAN),plugged the battery charger to avoid any possible battery problem, restarted windows, and then from within windows I started the updater (windows version, as recommended by Toshiba). Everithing looked fine, nothing different of what I used to see on those old COMPAQs.
As warned by the updating program, the system was going to reboot. And actually it did so.
Windows closed quite normally (a bit quicker than normal, but without errors, and since there were no other programs than the essentials -even the antivirus was not running-), the computer switched of, all lights off (normal), and then it switched on again...
{color:#0000ff}*BEEEEEEEEEEEEP... BEEEP... BEEEEP...*{color}
OMG! I never espected something THAT bad. 3-1-1!
And now... What a 3-1-1 stands for here? Award BIOS would mean no video card or deffective video card, but it is not true, since it was working up to 20 seconds ago. It must be the BIOS.
It never came again to life. It is still beeping 3-1-1.
But now comes the investigation of the human-factors involved in this accident.
I found I commited the following failures:
*(1)* To rely in the manufacturer, even though they WROTE their information could be wrong or incomplete. (BAD if I were a QA&QC inspector).
*(2)* I didn't cross checked deeply enough (until it was already too late).
*(3)* I didn't looked previously for the way to make a backup of the BIOS, in order to restore should anything go wrong.
*(4)* Let Toshiba lead me to a path I didn't want to walk, just because of their offer of "increased functionality".
*(5)* Beleave in Toshiba when they said "relatively simple operation and can be carried out by most competent computer users"... they never said it is failproof.
Then I started the most interesting part of the investigation.
{color:#0000ff}*"What went wrong?"*{color}
Obviously, the BIOS update failed somehow, somewhere. And I wanted to know what and where.
First thing I discovered was that there are another search engine in Toshiba called "askiris" ([http://askiris.toshiba.com]) and I looked there in order to see if for any chance I could get the old 1.20 BIOS version that was installed originally in that machine.
And I found something... VERY interesting:
bq. {color:#800080}*From: * \\ {color}{color:#800080}* ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.10 for Satellite 1410/1415/2410* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* bios for these models. TAIS. Downloads. DL. 105481 289838 289838 ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.10 for Satellite 1410/1415/2410. 2002-10-04. 105589...* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* Published 10/4/02* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* From: * \\ {color}{color:#800080}* ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.40 for Satellite 1410/1415/2410/2415* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* FDD Version 1.30 TAIS. Downloads. DL. 105481 357972 357972 ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.40 for Satellite 1410/1415/2410/2415. 2003-01-31. 105589 PUB...* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* Published 1/31/03 | Rating:* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* From: * \\ {color}{color:#800080}* ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.20 for Satellite 1410/2410* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* error message during BIOS TAIS. Downloads. DL. 105481 305240 305240 ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.20 for Satellite 1410/2410. 2002-11-01. 105589 PUB...* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* Published 11/1/02 | Rating:* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* From: * \\ {color}{color:#800080}* ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.30 for Satellite 1410/1415/2410* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* 1) Changed the content TAIS. Downloads. DL. 105481 330963 330963 ACPI Flash BIOS version 1.30 for Satellite 1410/1415/2410. 2003-01-03. 105589...* \\ {color}{color:#800080}* Published 1/3/03 | Rating:* {color}
Those are: V110, V140, V120 and V130 for series 1410/15 and 2410.
GOOD! Or not?
Let's take a look:
First thing I did was download everything all four files.
Then I took the same version that made the crash: 1.40
Than I uncompressed the file, and I found:
06/05/2009 00:17 <DIR> .
06/05/2009 00:17 <DIR> ..
31/01/2003 08:38 1,605,632 11410v14.iso
31/01/2003 08:38 511,764 1370D14.EXE
{color:#ff0000}*08/01/2003 17:03 724,480 2410a9v140.exe*{color}
09/01/2003 09:32 250,663 biofca9t.com
08/10/2002 05:26 30,697 chgbiosa.exe
31/01/2003 08:36 1,087 instinfo.bat
13/05/2002 15:25 378,175 launcher.exe
31/01/2003 08:36 433 launcher.ini
06/05/2009 00:17 0 list.txt
31/01/2003 08:36 14,768 readme.com
*{color:#ff0000}31/01/2003 08:36 12,513 readme.txt{color}*
11 archivos 3,530,212 bytes
3 dirs 9,404,600,320 bytes libres
And I got my first surprise here: There is a {color:#ff0000}*README.TXT*{color} that was not present in the file I downloaded previously from the drivers repository.
So I went to the readme.txt and I found this:
"README.TXT 01-31-2003 CDC
Flash BIOS version 1.40 for Satellite 1410
This BIOS is applicable to the following models:
Satellite 1410-S105
Satellite 1410-S106
Satellite 1410-S173
Satellite 1410-S174
Satellite 1410-S175
Satellite 1410-S176
Satellite 1415-S105
Satellite 1415-S106
Satellite 1415-S115
Satellite 1415-S173
Satellite 1415-S174
Satellite 1415-S175
Satellite 1415-S176
Satellite 2410-S203
Satellite 2410-S204"
Please note that the model 1410-604 is *NOT* listed.
I thought "well, it must be another archive..."
But then I realized of a name that sounds familiar, it was there, in the directory where I uncompressed this 1.40 file, and the name is:
{color:#0000ff}*2410A9V140.EXE*{color}
So I took the other file, the BIOS_Win update, and I discovered that the file name is:
*{color:#0000ff}2410A9V140.EXE{color}* (Ups!)
So I uncompressed it again, to find:
El volumen de la unidad D no tiene etiqueta.
El n£mero de serie del volumen es: 8838-E175
Directorio de D:\Shared\diskette\2410A9v140
06/05/2009 00:43 <DIR> .
06/05/2009 00:43 <DIR> ..
*{color:#0000ff}09/01/2003 09:32 _250,663_ BIOFCA9T.COM{color}*
17/07/2002 03:38 35 biosupd2.ini
13/07/2001 13:22 6,277 chgbios2.vxd
*{color:#0000ff}08/10/2002 04:26 _30,697 _CHGBIOSA.EXE{color}*
09/11/2001 09:14 134 clean2.reg
17/07/2002 03:35 342,064 install2.exe
16/07/2002 06:55 241,664 nchgbios2.exe
18/08/2001 11:41 3,435 nchgbios2.sys
23/10/2001 18:55 11,476 nchgbios2NT.sys
26/08/2001 09:00 49,152 nchgbios2svc.exe
13/07/2001 17:05 49,152 tbdecode.dll
14/03/2002 06:42 49,152 TCHGBIOSInfo.dll
21/06/2002 11:25 1,796 tosclean2.bat
09/11/2001 12:01 967 tosclean2.pif
21/06/2002 11:34 1,841 toscleanAUTO2.bat
21/06/2002 11:44 1,796 toscleanSMS2.bat
21/06/2002 08:51 2,038 tosntclean2.bat
21/06/2002 08:51 2,084 tosntcleanAUTO2.bat
21/06/2002 08:52 2,038 tosntcleanSMS2.bat
20 archivos 1,046,461 bytes
2 dirs 9,402,793,984 bytes libres
No readme file...
Then another question arised in my mind: What about the other 1.40 file? What does the other 2410A9V140.EXE have inside?
This:
El volumen de la unidad D no tiene etiqueta.
El n£mero de serie del volumen es: 8838-E175
Directorio de D:\Shared\diskette\comparacion_toshiba\askiris\241 0a9v140
06/05/2009 00:46 <DIR> .
06/05/2009 00:46 <DIR> ..
*{color:#0000ff}09/01/2003 09:32 _250,663 _BIOFCA9T.COM{color}*
17/07/2002 03:38 35 biosupd2.ini
13/07/2001 13:22 6,277 chgbios2.vxd
*{color:#0000ff}08/10/2002 04:26 _30,697 _CHGBIOSA.EXE{color}*
09/11/2001 09:14 134 clean2.reg
17/07/2002 03:35 342,064 install2.exe
16/07/2002 06:55 241,664 nchgbios2.exe
18/08/2001 11:41 3,435 nchgbios2.sys
23/10/2001 18:55 11,476 nchgbios2NT.sys
26/08/2001 09:00 49,152 nchgbios2svc.exe
13/07/2001 17:05 49,152 tbdecode.dll
14/03/2002 06:42 49,152 TCHGBIOSInfo.dll
21/06/2002 11:25 1,796 tosclean2.bat
09/11/2001 12:01 967 tosclean2.pif
21/06/2002 11:34 1,841 toscleanAUTO2.bat
21/06/2002 11:44 1,796 toscleanSMS2.bat
21/06/2002 08:51 2,038 tosntclean2.bat
21/06/2002 08:51 2,084 tosntcleanAUTO2.bat
21/06/2002 08:52 2,038 tosntcleanSMS2.bat
20 archivos 1,046,461 bytes
2 dirs 9,402,781,696 bytes libres
*{color:#ff0000}They both have 20 files, and 1,046,461 bytes. I asumed they are both the SAME file{color}*.
And the readme file does not list the model 1410-604 in its readme file, therefore I cannot explain this except as a mistake from Toshiba. *{color:#ff0000}They put an incorrect BIOS in their website, and suggested the update, and somehow leaded to this kind of errors.{color}*
(Except in the case that one of those models is a different name of the 1410-604 model, and if it is the case... now I don't know why this BIOS do not work with this computer).
The worst part is that neither of those other files (V1.10, 1.20 and 1.30) lists the 1410-604, therefore there seems no possible workaround for this problem. I need an original v1.20 for this CMOS, and Toshiba seems not to have it. They offered me to solve the problem, by leaving the notebook at an ASP, and paying only 95€ for the work and about 280€ for a motherboard replacement, I will get it solved. But they offer no warranty of their possibilities because is a model 'too old' and 'discontinued' and with 'no support'...
In other words, they said "don't bother with this, just go out there and buy a new one" (something absolutely out of my scope in this crisis-time) :P
Thank you for reading soooo far.
Now what I need is to get any ideas of a workaround for this, my ideas are:
(1) This CMOS has a boot-part that still works (it allows a roll-back if you have the appropriate file). So I need a good BIOS to burn into the CMOS, from the VERY SAME model (a BIOS backup) but the backup must be adequate for the burning program (CHGBIOSA.COM).
(2) It is still possible that the BIOS could be OK but the data on the CMOS got somehow corrupted. If so, clearing the CMOS could solve de problem. But I was not able to find a clear cmos button from outside, and after disasembling I took of the battery, with no good results. I have to try leaving the MOBO without battery for longer period (I left it about 20 seconds) just in case 20 seconds don't allow all the capacitors to fully go to zero values. I have not much hope in this point.
(3) Try to get a REAL good update from Toshiba. I contacted several times technical support, and I was able to verify they are only phone-operators, with a script in front of them, and when the problem goes-out-of-scope they fall always in the same answer: "you have to go to an ASP". I still have a low hope to find someone who really knows a bit, and could enlighten with a good BIOS to put in this disks.
(4) As far as I could find, this BIOS is not from any known BIOS-maker. It seems it has been developed by Toshiba (own brand), therefore the Crisis Recovery Disk from Phoenix will not be of any help here. As well as any other BIOS recovery tool not designed for Toshiba's BIOS. But I'm open to any ideas, that could be tested more or less safely. (Remember that the 'BIOS-BOOT-PART' feature is still working, I don't want to loose this only possibility of redemption).
Wwwaaaaoooowww... what a long-post falks! Sorry for that!
Forgive me, but I wanted to be really clear.
Should anyone give some hints or advice, will be greatly appreciated.
Please don't say what I shouldn't do... I already know that. I already researched and already found my mistakes, in order not to repeat them. Now I need to move on, to advance, and to try to solve this, or at least learn how to solve similar things. As much as possible.
Thank you again, in advance, and sorry again.
FenixDigital
Message was edited by: Fenix_D
Changed subject to beter reflect what is the matter about (apparently erroneous BIOS file in Toshiba download center).

Well. 
 
It's not dead, certainly. 
 
The steps that I put in my procedure were: 
 
--> There are two memory sims, that I am going to identify as M1 and M2 
--> There are two memory banks, that I am going to identify as A and B 
 
Next step in order to identify if there are some module or bank that is not working properly are: 
 
The modules were installed as: 
 
M1 --> A 
M2 --> B 
 
1--> Boot without any memory chip. 
 
<blockquote>
A--> X 
B--> X 
</blockquote>
 
2--> Boot with ONE module 
 
<blockquote>
A-->M1 
B-->X 
</blockquote>
 
3--> Boot with the OTHER module 
 
<blockquote>
A--> X 
B--> M2 
</blockquote>
 
4--> Boot with BOTH modules swapped: 
 
<blockquote>
A--> M2 
B--> M1 
</blockquote>
 
5--> Boot with ONE module swapped: 
 
<blockquote>
A--> M2 
B--> X 
</blockquote>
 
6--> Boot with the OTHER module swapped: 
 
<blockquote>
A--> X 
B--> M1 
</blockquote>
 
At this point I got a great difference. It booted, finally. But in order to make a diagnostic, I have to complete the full test, and the results were: 
 
1--> Boot without any memory chip. 
 
A--> X 
B--> X 
 
NOT BOOTING Actually the computer not even tries to read the disk. Only the power led turns on, but even prior to press the 'on/off' button. I think this indicates 'no memory installed'. I would have expected a post failure beeps, but there were no beeps at all. 
 
2--> Boot with ONE module 
 
A-->M1 
B-->X 
 
BOOTED NORMALLY Well. This obviously means that the 3-1-1 beep code means memory error, or one bank failing of two installed. Now I didn't know if the problem was the module, or the bank B. 
 
3--> Boot with the OTHER module 
 
A--> X 
B--> M2 
 
NOT BOOTING Just like the condition in 1. Like no memory installed, therefore there are two possibilities: The bank B is not working, or the memory module M2 is not working. 
 
4--> Boot with BOTH modules swapped: 
 
A--> M2 
B--> M1 
 
NOT BOOTING Just like previous to test condition. Beep code 3-1-1, no boot at all. 
 
5--> Boot with ONE module swapped: 
 
A--> M2 
B--> X 
 
NOT BOOTING This was the important test, because it finally let me determine that the problem is at the module 2 (M2) not at the bank B. But still there could be a failure IN THE BANK B and IN THE MEMORY MODULE 2. Have to do the other test. 
 
6--> Boot with the OTHER module swapped: 
 
A--> X 
B--> M1 
 
BOOTING NORMALLY This really confirmed there is nothing wrong with ANY bank, but one of the modules is not working, actually is not being even detected. This is quite weird, because this computer was working perfectly with those two modules, and in the moment of the BIOS upgrade it seems to fail... How come? 
 
Something weird happened here. I don't know what, but something ruined one memory module (fortunately only one), what I would like to know now is what happened. But at least I have the machine running, with very low memory, but running. 
 
What I am thinking now is what about this BIOS upgrade makes the motherboard not to recognize one of the modules for some reason? 
 
<img class="jive-emoticon" src="images/emoticons/happy.gif" border="0" alt=":)" /> 
 
I will continue my research, but certainly the memory made the difference. 
 
I am not sure why I didn't discover this before, I think I didn't perform this test before, for two reasons: 
 
(1) I tried to boot with no memory, and this was impossible, so I assumed that the problem was not at the memory. 
 
(2) When I heard the beep code (3-1-1), somewhere I read it was a video problem, and I asume most probably it was a video problem (since no video at all was being displayed) but I should have take into consideration that Phoenix BIOS also means with the same 3-1-1 a DMA problem (memory problem). 
 
Okis... It's a pitty having to wait so much between a post and it's approval. I posted my answer two days ago, and since it didn't appear, I believe It didn't upload, so I replied again, and also didn't appeared... until now. It is obvious that a moderator approval is required. That's why I have to wait 24 hours or more to read my post. This slows this forum effectiveness. 
 
Thank you very much for your help. I'll keep you informed. Until we get to a final diagnosis and solution.

HT204268; I have purchases on an aol login pre 2008 and all recent stuff under an apple id. I currently see and use everything when i login with the apple id. After March 31st will my apple id account still show and contain all?

HT204268; I have purchases on an aol login pre 2008 and all recent stuff under an apple id. I currently see and use everything when i login with the apple id. After March 31st will my apple id account still show and contain all?
I understand the instructions to create a new account id (apple id) from the old aol account. However, does this mean my purchases will be split into 2 accounts; or does the fact that I currently see everything under my apple id (regardless of the purchased by username) mean this will all still appear in my current account as it does now?

You see them where when you login your non-AOL account ?
If you currently have two accounts (the AOL username account and an email address account) then you will continue to have two accounts, and nothing should change when you update the AOL account to be an email address (apart from how you access that account).
You will just be renaming the account to have an email address for accessing it, not creating a new account.

InfoPath cannot load the view. The view may have been modifed to contain unsupported HTML such as frames.

Hi,
I'm running InfoPath 2013 Designer and I'm experiencing a very annoying bug. Whenever I try to open a Infopath file I get the error, "InfoPath cannot load the view. The view may have been modifed to contain unsupported HTML such as frames."
Sometimes it opens without a problem but most the time I get this error message. The strange thing is that I can create a new form without any frames, save it and then when I go to open it have the same problem. I've tried reinstalling InfoPath but it didn't
help.
Please help!!!
Thanks in Advance,
Mark Elliott
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit; Internet Explorer 11; Office 2013 Pro

Has anybody figured this out? I have the same problem. InfoPath 2013 will not open any files from one computer which all work from another computer with the same version of InfoPath so this basically rules out file corruption. (The files are in
a network share). Both computer have InfoPath 2013. If I reboot the computer in question it will sometimes work then goes back to the error.
The only difference between this computer an all the others is that this one has a bunch of Office 2010 updates since it has SharePoint 2010 designer installed, (not office). I did try to uninstall the updates but the problem has not been resolved.
This is the second time this happens. Last time I had to completely remove Office 2013 & SharePoint designer then used the Windows rollback feature and finally reinstall office 2013. Everything worked great until I installed SharePoint 2010
designer then after a few updates the problem resurfaced.
This is really annoying, I cant believe its not happening to more people.
Ben
** Update **
The problem went away although I am not 100% sure why. I decided to provide additional information in case someone has the same issue. I deleted the Digital Certificate that I had previously requested from our domain server. Now suddenly everything
is working. Like I said before, I'm not sure if this was the cause/fix but if you are having the same problem perhaps you can try the same thing and provide some feedback to possibly help others.
I would like to thanks anyone who spent time on this.
**Update**
The problem came back. At this point I suspect either an update or something with Visual Studios 2012. My forms are heavy on custom code so I must be doing something wrong. I doubt it was an update since it would be happening to more people
Again, I am able to open the same file from another computer with the only difference being that the other PC does not have Visual Studio 2012

Does Neo2 Plat bios 1.4 official contain all the "updates" in the beta bios 1.36/1.37

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for