Does rendering previews larger than max native resolution benifit you.

Hi, I have Adobe Lightroom 4.3. I like to know if rendering standard previews, larger than the max native resolution of my LCD display (1680x1050), will Help me, if I look edit photos at great than 1:1 ratio. IE, 2880, 2040, 1680 etc.. In some cases. I work on files with a brush, up to 8:1 magnification. Does that extra resolution translate to greater detail when working that close?

help1111111111111111,
You may want to re-think your workflow.
Image sequencing in Develop module is sloooooooowww... - no way around it (other than using EditInLightroom plugin, which reduces resolution, temporarily, in favor of develop module speed, but even then it's slow compared to Library module). note: last 4 images developed are cached in ram, those are fast to get at, but the rest: slooooooooowww...
Image sequencing in Library module is faaaaaaaaaast - if you have up-to-date previews, otherwise it's slooooooowww too.
So the trick is to make sure library previews are up-to-date, then sequence images in the library module - when you hit the image(s) you want to edit, press 'd', or another develop module keyboard shortcut... - then, upon edit completion, return to library module, via 'e' or 'g', or some other preferred method, for more sequencing.
Bottom-line: switching between library & develop module ad-infinitum is a fact of Lightroom life, if you are one of those who can't "do everything there is to do in one module before switching to the other" (I'm one too), and you want to use Lightroom most efficiently.
Maybe one day, Adobe will integrate the lib & dev modules and/or enhance Lightroom to better cache image viewing data, until then... - good luck.
Rob

Similar Messages

MS Project - Printing to dimensions larger than max print driver settings

I have a large (2000+) task Gantt chart but no wide-format printer.
I've tried printing to PDF - the tasks, durations, start, finish & resources columns show but the bars don't and the data replicates 4x so I end up having to mess with the file, deleting the extraneous pages, before I send it out for review, anyway.
I tried downloading a wide-format printer driver simply so I could select that printer as my 'default' and set the printer to 'print' to 24x36 while I work with the document, but can't install it because I don't actually have a wide-format printer on my
network.
Two questions:
First: How do I get the bars to show in a PDF print?
Second: How do I set the print area larger than my max paper size of 17x11?
Thanks.

Thank you very much for your response, Guillaume.
The issue is that I only have standard sized printers available to me. The drivers of these control and restrict the 'print' size of the PDF file. I had already selected the columns, etc., but could not get the right-hand part of the document
to appear no matter what settings I changed. I tried manipulating the columns printed, the page size, etc. but nothing worked.
Additionally, no matter what else I did (and I suspect it had to do with the program attempting to print the Gantt bars) I ended up with multiple prints of the document within my finished PDF. Meaning I had to use the Professional version of Adobe
to go back and delete the 50+ pages I didn't need before I could distribute what was useful to everyone else on the team.
I did manage to solve this issue by downloading a wide-format printer driver (even though we don't have a wide-format printer on the network, which was a feat in and of itself!). Now I can choose the non-existent printer as my default when I'm working
in / on this document and can print to PDF on a virtual 36" page - showing everything (in little tiny mouse print). That will be my next challenge - but I'm more than halfway there!
Best~
Philippa

Get-MailboxFolderStatistics for mailbox with items larger than 25MB

Hi all,
try to get mailboxfolderstatistic for all mailboxes that contains items larger than 25 MB With the following command:
Get-mailbox -Resultsize Unlimited | get-mailboxfolderstatistics -includeanalysis -FolderScope All
{Size -gt '25MB'}| Select-Object name,itemsinfolder,TopSubject,TopSubjectSize,topsubjectCount,topsubjectPath | export-csv c:\25mb.csv
But i get Error :
The input Object cannot be bound to any parameters for the command either because the command does not take pipeline input or the input and its Properties do not match any of rhte parameters that take pipline input.
Any ideas?Im not so good at pws.
thanks!
Please mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you. Thank you! Off2work

Hi all,
have tried all above command but when i did a check it didnt work that well.What i ended up with is following script:
$MBX = Get-Mailbox –resultsize unlimited
$MBX | foreach {New-MailboxExportRequest -Mailbox $_.Identity -ContentFilter {Size -gt '25MB'} -FilePath ('\\server01\pst\ ‘ + $_.Alias + '(' + $_.DisplayName + ').PST')}
Downside with this script is that it export all mailboxes to a pst file.Inside its structure of users folder.
Upside is that it only export mail items that are larger than 25 MB,but you will need to create a search folder to find items larger than 25mb.
Most of pst files that are exported are less than 2mb in size.So we sorted them by size and delete everything that is less than 25MB.
We then ended up with all mailboxes that have items larger than 25MB.
So if you have over 5000 mailboxes then this wont be recomended.We had over 1200 and the export went fine over night.
Amits recomendation also probably works,but havent tested that one.
THanks all for your help!
Please mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you. Thank you! Off2work

Cannot open a db file larger than 2GB

Hello,
I have an Oracle Express Edition 10g running on Redhat Enterprise Linux 4 server.
I have an Oracle database file which is 2.1 GB in size. I am not able to open this file using the application or the Oracle sql developer. The error message that I get is:
ORA-01110: data file 5: '/usr/lib/oracle/xe/oradata/XE/service_3_0.dbf'
ORA-27041: unable to open file
Linux Error: 13: Permission denied
I think this has to do with the fact that since it is not a 64-bit Linux but a 32-bit Linux, it does not support files larger than 2GB. What do you think I should do to tackle this problem?
Best Regard
Thayalan

Hello,
I have an Oracle Express Edition 10g running on
Redhat Enterprise Linux 4 server.
I have an Oracle database file which is 2.1 GB in
size. I am not able to open this file using the
application or the Oracle sql developer. The error
message that I get is:
ORA-01110: data file 5:
'/usr/lib/oracle/xe/oradata/XE/service_3_0.dbf'
ORA-27041: unable to open file
Linux Error: 13: Permission denied
I think this has to do with the fact that since it is
not a 64-bit Linux but a 32-bit Linux, it does not
support files larger than 2GB. What do you think I
should do to tackle this problem?
Best Regard
ThayalanThat's interesting! I had no problems with opening files 32767MB in size on the very same 32 bit RH EL 4.0. How did you conclude that your file is too large, based on the error message which reads "Linux Error: 13: Permission denied"? Have you tried reading the manual page for the "open" system call and see when does it return EACCESS (error 13), found in /usr/include/asm-i386/errno.h. My man page for open says the following:
ERRORS
EACCES The requested access to the file is not allowed, or search per-
mission is denied for one of the directories in the path prefix
of pathname, or the file did not exist yet and write access to
the parent directory is not allowed. (See also path_resolution(7).)
What lead you to the conclusion that your file is too big? Do you have an access to a system administrator who knows how to use "strace"? If your system admin doesn't know how to use "strace", he too deserves waterboarding.

Can I use a usb external hard drive larger than 2TB? I have tried to use a 3TB but it shows up as 800GB.

Can I use a usb external hard drive larger than 2TB? I have tried to use a 3TB but it shows up as 800GB. Even tred to reformat in disk utility but only shows as 800 gb as well. It is a Seagate 3TB harddrive and enclosure. Nothing on the Seagate site about it other than it says Mac os through 10.6 is supported for larger than 2TB (might be old).

You might have better luck in the Snow Leopard community. I'll ask the hosts to relocate your post.
10.6 Snow Leopard

Is it possible to set up a document larger than my printer is able to print in Indesign?

I have a printer that prints no larger than A3 but need to create an A1 document which I will get printed elsewhere.
In changing the page sizes, Indesign only gives me the size options that are compatible with my printer. Is it possible to create a document larger than these sizes?
Jack

Do you mean the default list of page sizes that appears in the New Document dialog? Well, you are absolutely not limited to just those values. Just type in any width and height in the fields directly below the drop down list.
To quickly get the correct values for A1, select "A3" size -- the Width and Height fields change to the correct values for this -- then type in "*2" in each of the fields and "enter" this using the Tab key, rather than pressing Enter.

Is there any way to store data larger than 4000 bytes?

Hi,
Could someone here know which data type to store database column size larger than 4000 bytes.
VARCHAR2 has the limit of 4000 bytes in database column. Is there ways to store data larger than 4000 bytes?
Thank you very much!

CLOB
You use the CLOB datatype to store large blocks of character data in the database, in-line or out-of-line. Both fixed-width and variable-width character sets are supported. Every CLOB variable stores a locator, which points to a large block of character data. The size of a CLOB cannot exceed four gigabytes.
CLOBs participate fully in transactions, are recoverable, and can be replicated. Changes made by package DBMS_LOB can be committed or rolled back. CLOB locators can span transactions (for reads only), but they cannot span sessions.
Joel P�rez

PS Touch needs a warning message when importing files larger than 2048x2048 max resolution

I opened 6500x5000 px files into PS Touch in iPad for some minor retouching. PS Touch - without notification - reduced the images to fit within 2048 x 2048 px. It happily let me open these files, work on them and save and never let me know it was reducing the file size, rendering all the work I did utterly useless since 2048x2048 is far too small for print res for these files.
PS Touch needs a notification or warning when importing files larger than the app's max resolution. Resizing files without notification is just asinine.

Hi Jeff,
For improvements or feature requests - please create an Idea for others to vote for:
Thanks,
Ignacio

Native resolution does not fill entire external display

I've got one of the original MacBook Pros with the Mobility Radeon X1600 hooked up to a Samsung P2350G display (it's a 23" LCD panel.) The native resolution on the display is 1920x1080.
The display has inputs for both VGA and DVI. The DVI port however is used by a desktop PC already, so I use a DVI to VGA adapter on the MacBook Pro, and use the laptop panel as a secondary display.
The problem is that when I set the external display to its native resolution, I get vertical letterboxing and some flickering along the edges of the image. It does not horizontally fill the whole display as it should. I have tried the same adapter on the PC and it worked fine (though with rather spotty image quality.)
Resolutions that are lower than 1920x1080 work fine and fill the whole display properly. I'm not exactly sure what the issue is. The laptop is only semipermanently attached to the large display so I can live with a reduced image quality there, but the flickering, slightly distorted image is just not acceptable right now.

Sounds like it might be a sync issue. Have you tried powering the monitor off and then back on with the MBP connected to it? How about just temporarily disconnecting the DVI cable from the desktop PC and using that to plug into the MBP.

Limiting photo preview to native resolution

i am really getting frustrated with iphoto. i cannot figure out how to constrain the preview to not open up beyond the native resolution of the image i want to view. so when i press the space bar, and i have an image that is, say, 640x800 pixels, i don't want the image to open up to the full extent of the iPhoto application screen footprint. naturally, this results in a badly pixelated image. i have a 27" imac, so real estate is not a problem.
what should happen, i the image would open up to a 1:1 ratio IF it is smaller than iPhoto screen real estate, if it is not smaller, well then it would just open to fit screen basically.
i get frustrated wiht quickview for the same reason. let's say i am scrolling through images on my desktop keeping the quickview window open, and if i initially open an image, say 500px x 500px, anything small will open at it's native resolution, and anything larger wills imply be truncated by the extent of the quickview window dimension.
anyone have any suggestions or work arounds that could help?
i wold vastly appreciate it.

Double click on the image to get it into the edit mode which will give you the 1:1 ratio.
Send a feature request to Apple via via http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphoto.html for an option to limit the size to 1:1 when you use the space bar in the thumbnail mode.
OT

Pre "Rendering Preview" colours are better - why does LR make it worse?

Hi guys
When I upload a photo for the first time and then view its larger preview for the first time. When lightroom is generating its preview, it takes a second to generate it. When it generates the preview, the colours that it generates arn't as good as the first image of the photo you see. The photo changes colour after its generating the larger preview... and the generated colours are not as good.
Why does this occur. In all cases the colour of the photo prior to the preview being rendered are better than the colours once it has finished generating.
Cheers
Anthony

Anthony
Ok cool that makes sense... If I didn't take the photo in landscape mode or anything like that, do I just shift it back to "Camera Faithful"...
Yes and No. The profile is not chosen based on what you were shooting with (this only affects your JPGs), but based on the default, which is Adobe Standard (see also below). But switching it gives you another point to start your editing on.
Also I have a fair few photos that I would like to change back from "Adobe Standard" to "Camera Faithful" is there any way to do this on mass?
1) To change multiple photos to a specific profile:
In Develop:
Set one photo to the desired profile
Select all additional images to have the same profile in the film strip (Shift+Click or Ctrl+Click)
Press Sync...
Deselect all settings but Calibration
Hit Synchronize
2) To make a certain profile default for all imports for a specific camera type:
Set one photo to the desired profile (do not alter any other parameters, as they will be set as default also)
Press Alt and click on Set Default ...
Hit Update to Current Settings
Note: The Defaults set this way are valid for imports for a specific Camera Model, limited to a Camera Serial-No. and/or ISO Setting, depending on your settings in Preferences/Presets.
Lastly, are the colour profiles better in LR 3...
Somebody else will have to answer for this question, I think they are basically the same, but the underlying algorithm has been vastly improved. Btw, "better" is a generally a bad word when refering to camera profiles. You'll find lots of posts here regarding this subject, e.g. here.
Beat Gossweiler
Switzerland
Message was edited by: b_gossweiler

HT2506 How do I drag an image around in the view, once it's magnified larger than the viewing area? I can imagine a simple "hand" tool like in Adobe PDF Reader doing this, but it's oddly missing in this application, quite a shame.

How do I drag an image around in the view, once it's magnified larger than the viewing area? I can imagine a simple "hand" tool like in Adobe PDF Reader doing this, but it's oddly missing in this application, quite a shame.

@Csound1 how is my mac relevant? I'm talking about software not hardware.
@Kurt Lang sorry, I composed the message when looking at "Preview" application help on this site, the fact that it missed the context here, is another issue I have with Apple's "famous" UI/UX design...
So for the record, I'm talking about the "Preview" app that comes bundles with Max OSX.

Having a bigger resolution than the native one?

Hi,
I own a Samsung NC10 netbook and on a conference a met a guy who own this, too . This poor guy uses Windows on his machine, but I have to admit that he used a feature that I find quite useful: When he connected his netbook to a projector and cloned the output, the resolution of the projector (1024*786 i guess) was higher than the one of the netbook (1024*600). What happened on his windows machine was that he could scroll to the bottom of the screen to see the missing 186 pixels that where shown in the silver screen but cut off on his LVCD.
When I (with Arch) use the NC10 on a projector I can only see the additional 186 pixels on the silver screen and I have no access to the bottom of the LVCD (what can be difficult when the silver screen is behind you ).
So, is it possible, to have this feature in Linux/Arch, too? To use a bigger resolution on the LVCD and "scroll" to the missing parts by moving the mouse to the edges of the screen?
I hope I explained this clearly - otherwise ask for more/other informations
Thanks!
barghest

Yes ,if you run
xrandr --fb 1024x768 --output LVDS1 --panning 1024x768 --output VGA1 --mode 1024x768 --pos 0x0
(LVDS1=the notebook's screen, VGA1=the beamer) you can scroll the internal panel up and down by moving the cursor to either edge while both outputs use 1024x768 and show the same thing. But this isn't really usable for presentations.
xrandr --output LVDS1 --scale 1x1.28 --output VGA1 --pos 0x0 --mode 1024x768
would stretch LVDS1 vertically to match the beamers resolution. But if you use KMS, --scale is currently broken, it just scales the background, nothing else. Example: Fedora Bug Report, the Arch version has the same problem.
Now, the modeline thingie:
You can calculate one using gtf x y R (x=horizontal width, y=vertical width, R=refresh rate). Running gtf 1024 600 60
results in
# 1024x600 @ 60.00 Hz (GTF) hsync: 37.32 kHz; pclk: 48.96 MHz
Modeline "1024x600_60.00" 48.96 1024 1064 1168 1312 600 601 604 622 -HSync +Vsync
The quoted part is just the name to use in xrandr's --mode command, so i removed the _60.00 and included it in the monitor section of my xorg.conf among others (i.e. 640x480 is there so I can run Starcraft in fullscreen ):
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "LVDS1"
VendorName "ASUS"
ModelName "EeePC 1000H"
Modeline "1024x600" 48.96 1024 1064 1168 1312 600 601 604 622 -HSync +Vsync
Modeline "800x600" 38.22 800 832 912 1024 600 601 604 622 -HSync +Vsync
Modeline "640x480" 23.86 640 656 720 800 480 481 484 497 -HSync +Vsync
EndSection
The X server adheres to these settings even if you're using KMS but I don't know if it does if you're using hotplugging because in this case these settings are intended to be generated automatically. I just use them because I don't want to use HAL. But trying to force a resolution bigger than the native one this way doesn't work for me.

Is it possible to publish a project with a different resolution than the native project resolution?

I think I know what the answer is going to be here, but I'm going to ask anyway. The background here is that I've made a few demo videos for new products and features my company is working on. I'm using CP4 for this. Our marketing department wants to take AVIs of my demos and insert them into their Powerpoint demonstrations. However, the native resolution of our demos doesn't make for a graceful import into Powerpoint. Thus, I've been directed to provide smaller res AVI files.
Thus, I am wondering if you can publish a project at a different resolution than the one in which it was recorded. My initial poking around seems to indicate that the answer is "no," and if this is truly the case, I will be rumbling over to the "Suggest a Feature" forum soon. There does seem to be a kind-of-workaround in that you can change the resolution of the project before publishing it, but this is something that cannot be undone, meaning that in order to do this, I will have to save new, smaller versions of all my projects. This is a bit ungainly.
So, if anyone knows a good trick here, I would love to hear it!

Unfortunately, I don't know what you mean when you say "manual panning." And I'm really not sure what you mean when you say the fields are not fully visible in the original image; they are completely visible. Here's a close-up from the original slide:
As you can see, the fields are completely visible.
Also, the slide is not entirely static. For the slide I chose as an example, the Password is filled in before the mouse moves. This typing may be part of what is getting Captivate confused; note this sequence from the resized version of the project:
Slide 35:
The login window first appears. Everything is normal. During this slide, the mouse moves and clicks inside the User ID field, leading to...
Slide 36:
At this point, things begin to go awry. The user name is entered, and the cursor moves to the Password field.
Slide 37:
Whoops! As soon as we click Login, everything goes back to normal.
Slide 38:
I will try a few of the suggestions you offered, and will report back with the results.

Big Problem with Directx 11 and Games scaling when lower than native resolution

Hi Guys,
MY system is Windows 7 Home Premium (Korean version), and I have dual GPUs, Nvidia Geforce GT 630m for gaming, and Intel HD Graphics 4000 for all other display matters. My native resolution is 1920 x 1080.
This problem wasn't there couple of years back, but from 2~3 years ago, when I play recent games that require/favour directx 11 (such as Assassin's Creed IV Black Flag, Batman: Arkham Origins), it seems when I use lower than native resolution (such as 1280
x 720) and select fullscreen, giant ugly black borders always appear around the game, and the game does not fill the whole screen.
I thought this was something which could be fixed in my GPU's control panel, but there was no scale fullscreen option under Nvidia's control panel. So I went into Intel HD Graphics control panel, but there was no Scale fullscreen option there either (under
native resolution. With lower resolution there was).
Anyway, after months and months of searching, I finally found an Intel forum which was discussing the same situation:
https://communities.intel.com/thread/44539
While going through the forum, I found out from other users that problem is not with GPU's drivers, but with Directx 11.
To test this theory, I put Batman: Arkham Origins in Force Directx 9 mode, and changed the game resolution to 1280x720. And the game showed no black borders, it scaled up perfectly to fullscreen under Directx 9 (so no problem whatsoever under directx
9). I changed the setting to Directx 11, and the ugly black borders appeared again.
Could someone please help with this? I know I can change my screen's resolution every time I play the game, but it's a real nuisance to do that. And more games are utilising Directx 11 or higher, and I don't think there are many games where I can
force Directx 9 mode like I did for Arkham Origins.
Or if someone connected could contact the people working on Directx 11 and ask about this issue (and get them to contact me through my email below), that would be much appreciated.
my email:
[email protected]
p.s. : all my GPU drivers are currently up to date, and the black borders issue is still there

Hello MeipoXu
While yes, at first people on the Intel forum thought it was the display driver problem (hence the question was originally posted on the Intel forum). But if you look closely through the pages especially Pages 2 onwards, there are some very astute
comments by some posters:
Update to black borders problem: The problem is DirectX11. Fx. Company of Heroes has a setting "Shader Quality" that when set to ULTRA it will run directX11 and when set below ULTRA it will run directX9. So the intel graphics driver is not
responsible! It is Microsofts DirectX11 that does it - maybe only to computers with both Intel HD and a second graphics card for video games
Different workarounds to the black border problem:
Change resolution before running fullscreen
Use directX9 instead of directX11
Fx. in CoH2 there is a setting fx. 50% of resolution, so even in native resolution the graphics is only half and thus faster
Try window mode without borders
and here's also another:
I can confirm that this problem still seems to exist, and that it definitely seems to be related to DirectX 11.
In a variety of games, turning DirectX11 off (either in-game or using ini files in some games that don't present you with the choice) fixes the issue. But this is obviously not ideal.
I have a laptop with a native resolution of 1920x1080, but tend to run games at 1280x720 because it provides much better performance on my HD 4400 graphics chip. This bug and the memory leak issue on Windows 8.1 are extremely annoying.
Like the first poster, my PC has intel HD GPU, and a second graphics card for games (Nvidia).
And all the members have mentioned that they updated the intel graphics driver, but it does not fix it - so it doesn't seem like a graphics driver problem (and more to do with Directx 11).
And they are right. With Batman Arkham Origins, if I set the resolution to 1366 x 768 and apply fullscreen, under Directx 11, ugly black borders appears. Luckily Arkham Origins has "Force Directx 9 mode" which I use, but a lot of games
don't have this mode (such as ACIV Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Sleeping Dogs etc) - you either play in ugly black borders, or can't play the game at all.
And all my Graphics Drivers are currently up-to-date, and issue still exists, so I don't think it's the driver problem.
I have already tried that registry method you just mentioned. It didn't work.
As for Directx 12, well I just hope it works better than Directx 11 (with its ugly black borders in games) does, and works well like Directx9 (with no problem in scaling).

Does rendering previews larger than max native resolution benifit you.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for