Does SRM PPS allow item level technical acceptance of bid?

Hi,
Does SRM PPS allow item level technical acceptance of bid?

Hi,
A technical bid response is made in cFolder for a RFx response from a bidder. In other words, an acceptance of a technical bid response is for all items before proceeding to open the RFx price response in SRM. During awarding in SRM, you can select/reject the item at item level.
So in short, you cannot accept technical bid response on the item level.
Best regards.
YS

Similar Messages

SRM 7.0 item level field in PO screen

Hi all,
We have a requirement to add a field for "Shipping instructions" in SRM just like it appears in ECC PO at the item level.
I currently dont have access to SRM 7.0 system.
Can someone confirm if there is a std field for "Shipping instrucions" in SRM 7.0 just like in ECC?
If not,has anyone implemented a custom solution for such a field.If so,how?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Its possible to add new texts through customizing - standard SRM provides by default some notes like Internal note, Vendor note etc.
We could create our own text, assign these texts to text schema and then assign text schema to transaction type (SHC for shopping cart). This can be done through customizing and then this new text type will comeup for item.
Regards,
Prasanna

Mapping drive using GPO does not obey to Item-level targeting

Dear all,
We are mapping drive using Item-level targeting based on security group (User Configuration > Preferences > Windows Settings > Drive Maps) with the following settings:
Action: Replace
Run in logged-on user's security context: <Checked>
Item-level targeting: <Checked>
So if user is member of Group_X then he/she will have drive X mapped on his computer.
Problem now is that (even if reconnect is unchecked), drive will stay mapped when we remove a user from this group.
Is this the normal behavior ? did I missed something ?
or even worst, imho, should I add a new drive properties which would say to delete the drive if user does not belong to the relevant group ?
-> double targeting query for a single drive
-> what's the point of Replace / Reconnect then ?
Thanks in advance for your opinions!
/behd
[EDIT: Forgot to specify Win2008R2 AD, Win7 Pro clients but doubt that it'll be of any interest for this case]

Drive mapping should not remain after you remove the user from the group.
What I suspect is, that at first, the "reconnect" was checked then the user got the policy and tattooed the reconnect value. after that it doesn't matter that "reconnect" was removed.
Try the following:
Logon with test user, make sure no drive mapping exist (disconnect if necessary).
Create a new policy with drive map - make sure reconnect is not checked, and apply it for the test user.
Make sure no other drive mapping policy exist for that user.
Login with the test user, make sure drive was mapped.
Log off that user, remove it from the group, wait for AD replication and log on again (sometimes another log off \ log on required).
Please take a moment to Vote as Helpful and/or Mark as Answer where applicable. Thanks.

Item level security apis

Hello:
Requesting clarification on a Content API question in 10G
Using the APIs, I have created a Page and an item heirarchy in the same page. Now in order to assign item level security, I need to call the following API to "enable" item level security on the specified item -
wwsbr_api.enable_ils_for_item(
p_master_item_id => v_category_id2a
,p_caid => v_page_group_id
,p_folder_id => v_new_page_id);
However, this throws an exception wwsbr_api.ILS_DISABLED
meaning -
"The page does not allow Item Level Security.
Cannot add item specific privileges."
But, how do we programmatically "enable" the Page to have
Item level security. - analogous to checking the box in the Page edit mode for "Enable item level security"
Thanks
-Ananth

I'd appeciate a reply as well. For now I've been using content as a PL/SQL stored procedure in a package and then wrapping is_logged_in code around it. It works but isn't cusomizable.

SAP SRM PPS

Hi All,
We are plannig for SRM PPS. Does SRM PPS supports services in PO .
As i know it only supports Extended classic, means it will not support Service procurement.
Any hint of PPS supporting service procurement??
Abdul raheem

Closing thread

SRM 7.0 SP05 - BRF Item level approval does not work

Hi Experts,
I am working on process controlled workflow for shopping cart approval process. I have defined necessary process levels and workflow works fine for a single item SC.
I have selected decision type as "Item-based approval for partial document" for each process level and hence expect each line item (according the start condition) should have it's own set off approvers, but instead of this, system determines approvers at header level and hence item which does not really need approval undergoes approval as well.
Could you please help me to resolve the issue?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Amit

Hi Bharat,
Yes, we are using the copy of the standard implementation. We are looking into the BADI implementation and trying to assign a separate AREA GUID to each line item. Hopefully, when different aggents are assigned to these AREA GUIDs, it will enable the item level approval. I will keep you updated.
Meanwhile, it would be really helpful if you could share some sample code of such badi implementation which can help me to understand it more clearly.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit

Addition of custom field in shopping cart at item level- SRM 7.0

Hi All
Can someone pls. let me know the step by step procedure for adding a custom field in the shopping cart at item level?
How is the field displayed in the portal screen and the settings for the same??
Also is this field available for manipulation through Business add-ins like other standard fields.
For e.g. I need to use the BADI BBP_CATALOG_TRANSFER to populate this new field.
Will it be available there once created?
Thanks
Kedar

Hi Kedar
Here are the steps....
1. Create a Custom field in SRM and append it to SC table structures in SRM
2. Add this field to the Custom field config for meta data at Item level in IMG>SRM Server> Cross application basic settings> Extensionsand and field control> Configure field control --> Configure control of fields at item level
3. THen find the respective web dynpro application and component for the shopping cart portal UI screen where you want the field to appear. You can do this by right click on the screen area and then select More Field Help
4. Go to SE 80 and enhance the respective webdynpro view by adding the custom field to the Context of the VIew and then adding it to the layout of the view at respective location. After doing this create a binding between the layout field and the context.....
More information around ABAP UI Flexibility can be found at:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/advancedsearch?query=%22abapUIFlexibility%22
Regards
Virender Singh

Item Level Permission does not work as designed

Here is the problem.
We have a site with a site members group with created permission level called vnContributor that differs from contributor in that they cannot edit delete items or versions, or create alerts.
We have a site owners group who have a custom permission level called vnOwner that allows them to add, edit, delete, view, and open items and view versions. They do not have "Manage Lists"
The list permission settings were set to view everyone and edit everyone. In this setting, however members could not see or edit anything, and owners could see and edit everything, regardless of whether it was theirs or not.
So I changed the list permissions level to edit only their own and changed the members to the OOTB contributor permission level. I then opened the calendar and added a new item as a user in the members group.
There was no change. Members still could not edit their items. Owners could see and edit everyone's items.
This is not how this is advertised to work.
ERJ MCSD MCDBA

On June 11, 2008 Rachel.lane entered the following request
"I would like to hide/show the edit button on a list item's edit form based on whether the user is the item's creator. The reason I want to do this is because SharePoint's out-of-the-box behaviour is such that when a user edits someone
else's item, the Access Denied page pops up AFTER the user makes his/her edits and presses ok.
" My users want the edit button to be hidden so they don't have to go through the steps of making the edits, press ok, and then find out their access is denied."
My users want the same thing.
Alex Santos1 said that "One approach is to give each list item it's own permission- giving the owner (creator) full access while giving everyone else read access."
However everything I seen about giving item level permission seems to utilize the method I've already been doing which does not hide the Edit button. Does anyone know how to pull off what he was suggesting?
ERJ MCSD MCDBA

Item level SC workflow in SRM 7

Hi all,
I am new to SRM 7.0.We have a reqt to implemnet the n step Item level approval workflow for Shopping cart based on the cost centre data in line items in SC.
Can some one explain me the steps how do I implement the above WF??
Which WF do I need to use in SRM 7.0??How is the BRF workfow implmenetation differenet than BADI workflow in SRM 5???
Where is the logic for approver determination to be defined in SRM 7??
Please advise.
Any helpful links to get started will be appreciated.

Thanks Masa...For the programming part,ABAP consultant can do it...But in case the WF goes into error,how is debugging to be done??
Also technically what are the advantages of workflows in SRM 7.0 compared to those which were used in SRM 5.0?

Dont allow to change item level data in sales order.

Hi all,
I have a requirement in which, users should not be allowed to change item level data or not allowed to add any new items in sales order on a certain condition. But they should be allowed to change the header level data.
How can i achieve this.
Can anyone help me?

Hi,
Check below exit.
MV45AFZZ and in form USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP.
Here check for ur validation, If passes then CHECK variable SVBAP-TABIX. If it is 0 then item is created. If it is GT 0 then item is changed. Other way could be...
select data from VBAP for each sales document and item in xvbpa internal table.
If for any item u don't have data in VBAP table that means u r adding that item. So issue error message.
*       FORM USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP                              *
*       This userexit can be used to move some fields into the sales *
*       dokument item workaerea VBAP                                  *
*       SVBAP-TABIX = 0: Create item                                 *
*       SVBAP-TABIX > 0: Change item                                 *
*       This form is called at the end of form VBAP_FUELLEN.          *
Thanks,
Vinod.

SRM catalog setting to make items level field vissible.

Hi
I am dealing with SRM catalog activitities . I want to know the setting by which we make the field visible on portal at item level.
rgds
amarendra

Hello amarendra,
which field are you talking about ?
The one to access to catalog?
If yes, you have to maintain Web Service value for CAT attribute.
Regards.
Laurent.

Does SRM/ROS or PPS addon support automatic generation of digital certifica

Hi Experts,
Does SRM / ROS or PPS addon support automatic generation of digital certificate for suppliers when they get registered in SRM? if not, is there any Badi or standard enhancement spot for the same?
Otherwise, how the digital certificates are communicated to suppliers to open the digitally signed documents from buyer side?
Thanks in advance,
Ranjan

Disabled the RTC Alarm power, left the computer off overnight. It did not power on. I'm gonna let it go another night or two then I'll consider this issue solved.
Anatolik I'll take a pint of Red Rocket Ale
2 Days now and no uncommanded power on. I'll consider this solved.
Last edited by Naruni (2014-09-22 16:59:52)

Query : Custom field at line item level in SRM 7.0 .

I was going through a document which instructs on how to add a custom field at line item level in SRM 7.0.
I found this code :
CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PD_SC_GETDETAIL'
EXPORTING
I_GUID = IV_DOC_GUID
I_WITH_ITEMDATA = 'X'
TABLES
E_ITEM = LT_ITEM
E_MESSAGES = LT_MESSAGES
E_STATUS = LT_STATUS. .
LOOP AT LT_STATUS INTO WA_STATUS.
IF WA_STATUS-STAT EQ 'I1015' AND WA_STATUS-INACT IS INITIAL.
LV_STATUS_APPROVE = 'X'.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
I wanted to know what is 'I1015' and what is its significance .
please advise .
Ambar

HI
This speaks about the status of the Cart. This means that the Status of the Cart is AWAITING APPROVAL...I dont know which document you have gone through but procedure for adding a Custom Field in SRM 7.0 is:
1. Create a Custom field in the Database in SRM. Preferrably add the field in an include and extend thta include to the table in SE11.
2. Go to Portal Login of SRM and right click the part of the screen where you want to add the custom field. Click on More Field Help. The popup will give you the name of WebDynpro Applicaiton which controls that area.
3. Login to SRM via GUI and display the webdynpro application using SE80. Enhance the Webdynpro application.
4. Add the custom field to the Context of the WebDynpro Application View. You will be selecting the field from the database table while adding the custom field to the context
5. Add the field at the specified place in Layout Tab of the WebDynpro View,
6. Create a binding between the Layout Field and the Context
7. Activate the changes.... you will see the field in Portal login of SRM....
For more details , refer to the Webdynpro help of the application...
Regards
Virender Singh

Only one delivery to be allowed against one Sales order at item level

Hi,
I have a requirement for some material in sales order if SO quanity is 25 we want that system should allow to create delivery of all 25 quanity one time we try to use Max.Part.Deliv. at item level by amking as 1 but system is juts giving the message and alowing to create multiple delivery, can we map as per our requirement.
regards,
zafar

Hello Zafar,
your requirement of complete delivery required for some materials only, so it has to be taken care manually when user creates sale order, for those specific items complete delivery should be marked at item level (run availability check for the item and mark for complete delivery).
If you want a permanent solution, please go for a development - define a table & maintain all the materials which are required to be delivered as complete delivery and then modify the sales order program, there is a specific include where the abaper can do this code change.
Regards
Suresh.

Item Level Targetting - does it use WMI in the background?

Hi everyone,
How does Item Level Targetting work in the background?
Is it just basically a WMI API? For instance, when using ILT, what is the query language for finding if a file is a specific version? "Select version from CIM_Datafile where ...." or is it a Powershell command, etc?
Which would be quicker - having a GPO with one WMI filter, or a GPO with a few ILT GPP settings.
I ask because my organization is of the opinion that WMI filters on GPOs should try and be avoided in place of GPP ILTs.
Regards,
Michael

> This is a quote from Martin Binder MVP - It should answer your query
> (just about) Im sure Martin will add to this!
Yes, he will :-))
http://evilgpo.blogspot.de/2014/11/showdown-wmi-filter-vs-item-level.html
> It uses "appropriate" APIs - ILT is much faster than WMI in most cases,
> unless you use ILT with a WMI query, of course :) And no, I don't know
> which APIs they use for this or that ILT item.
The above statement is still true - my post deals with a very fast WMI
class...
One example - You need a filter for a service that is installed and set
to automatic startup. You have two choices to filter for this service:
a) Select Name From Win32_Service Where Name="yourservice" And
StartMode="Auto"
This is the kind of filter almost everyone on the planet will use. And
it is DAMN SLOW.
b) Registry ILT:
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\yourservice:Start (REG_DWORD)
exists and has a value of 2
Guess which one will outperform the other one?
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

Does SRM PPS allow item level technical acceptance of bid?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for