Does windows server 2008 internet printingwork with Iphone as I really could do with finiding this out

I have a job on next week integrating iphone and was wondering if itwill work on windows server 2008 internet printing?
I am a bit of a newby to iphones
IT Support Costs
Thanks

This apparently would be possible if the server is running the HP ePrint Enterprise server. HP has an app that then allows an iOS device to print to it. There may be other, similar services, though I haven't found any. Perhaps someone else will know.
This is the iPad forum, by the way.
Regards.

Similar Messages

  • Unable to Install Windows Server 2012 on Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 Hyper-V

    My attempts to install are failing with a message "Windows cannot install required files. The file may be corrupt or missing....Error code: 0x800705070".
    I am posting this on the Wondows 2012 Server forum but I have had exactly the same problem as described below with Windows 2008 R2 SP1.
    As the title says this is on a Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 host with all current updates. I have downloaded the ISO file from a Technet subscription file twice, once by direct download and once by the Akamai downloader. The virtual disk is connected with
    the default IDE driver. I mounted both installation images as ISOs, located on a file system on the host server.  I have tried installs by deleting the VM and recreating both the VM and a new virtual disk, re-using a previously created virtual disk, and
    deleting the partitions in a previously created virtual disk, and executing the format command, and then attempting the install.
    I have exactly the same problem trying to create a Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 VM on the same host OS.  With those attempts, I downloaded the Technet subscription iso 4 or 5 times, and burned one to a DVD which I attached to the created VM.  Same
    error message.
    The virtual machines and virtual disks I created and used were all located on an RAID5 array, on a builtin Intel RAID controller using Intel Rapid Storage Technology software version 11.2.0.1066.  The host Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 uses this file system
    but the OS is installed on a dedicated drive (C).
    I had previously created a guest VM with Windows Server 2008 R2 (several months worth of updates ago) without drama.
    I have spent hours reading forums and blog articles on this.  A common response is to download the iso another time, and/or burn it to a DVD instead of mounting an iso image. Although I didn't do the later yet with 2012 Server, but I have done these
    other steps attempting to install Windows 2008 Server SP1. The install process takes a while (not to mention doing multiple downloads). Given this seems to be a common recommended remedy, and indeed based on posts does seem to eliminate the problem is some
    cases, why doesn't somebody change the Microsoft installer program so it does a thorough integrity check at the beginning of the install process?

    Jeff,
    After the exercise of Windows 2012 Server successfully installing (as I described above) I also successfully installed Windows 2008 R2 on Hyper-V.  From my standpoint, I have eliminated the problem (which isn't the same as correcting the problem).
    The answer to your specific question regarding Hyper-V support is that the motherboard I am using, an Asus P5Q, is not supported by Windows 2008 R2 because it doesn't use ECC memory, and the vendor doesn't say it supports Windows 2008. But I am sure you
    know the motherboard vendors often don't test older motherboards with newer software versions.  It appears that in specifying ECC memory Microsoft is trying to protect users of Windows Server from hurting themselves, not saying the software won't run.
    Having said that, my suspicion in the beginning was, and still is, that it was some variable(s) left in an unknown state in the Hyper-V environment, which was why after trying to install Windows 2008 R2 several times I tried Windows 2012 which resulted in
    the same error, and then encountered the same error trying to install Windows 7 on the same Hyper-V installation. The specific Hyper-V Windows 2008 R2 server had run without any operating problems for months before I started having trouble, and although it
    had been quite a while since I had created VMs, that process used to work.  The hardware didn't change. What changed was applying updates through Microsoft Update, and a few access control rights I changed, and at least I think, I set back to their original
    value.
    So in short, no, my hardware isn't supported by Windows 2008 Server.  Two, your assertion that you are running the same software configuration that I am is very unlikely to be true. There are an extremely large number of things which are different between
    your test system and mine, such as which Windows 2008 components are installed, what updates were installed and in what order they were installed, and what other third party software each of us is running, and between AD, and all the features, a large number
    of potential differences in ACLs, options, etc. and I don't for a minute think this particular problem was caused by the underlying hardware.
    I do appreciate your taking the time to try to help me, and I hope there is one thing you and I could agree on. Microsoft could pretty easily make it much easier to isolate problems. In this day and age reporting hex error codes (as opposed to doing the
    table lookup in the error handling proc), and not providing more diagnostic information seems to me to be almost quaint.  And in this case Microsoft can dismiss my problems on the grounds it was all on unsupported hardware. Unfortunately, I think they
    are missing an opportunity to make their software better, because in my opinion what I encountered there are a set of conditions which will cause installations to fail that aren't going to get corrected.

  • Very slow DFSR on Windows Server 2008

    We need to have distributed file system between two location.
    I evaluating possibility to use DFS and two Windows Server 2008 to do it.
    I set up two computer with clean installation of system.
    The test is on two local subnets, so speed should not be an issue.
    Each server is defined in separate logical site.
    The DFSR folder I create on one server has 50 GB / 40,000 files.
    The initial replication still is not finished after couple of days.
    The transfer speed is only about 5kB/s and 3 files / min.
    I increase staging quote to 100GB, so it should not be a limit.
    I also make simple test of speed between both servers.
    I create shared folder on both servers and manually copy files.
    The transfer speed is reasonable 5 MB/s (1000 time faster that DFSR).
    There is no processor load on servers (0% CPU).
    This is test before real use so server do almost nothing else.
    The event log shows sometimes 5014 but followed immediately with 5004.
    Does anybody have an idea what is wrong?

    Thank you for your help.
    The replication process just stopped.
    This morning target folder size is exactly same as yesterday.
    Previously it at least slowly increase.
    I looked at those log files, but I still need to understand them.
    The log level is default (means 4) and there is many entries there.
    Anyway I attached examples, while searching what it their meaning.
    The source server:
    Many warning looking like this:
    20090529 08:30:34.122 2772 SRTR  2344 [WARN] InitializeFileTransferAsyncState::ProcessIoCompletion Failed connId:{} rdc:0 uid:{}-v74162 gsvn:{}-v74162 Error:  [Error:170(0xaa) InitializeFileTransferAsyncState::ProcessIoCompletion servertransport.cpp:2235 2772 W The requested resource is in use.] completion:0 ptr:09B27F40
    From time to time errors sequence:
    20090529 08:33:33.086 2608 DOWN  3991 [ERROR] DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession Failed on connId:{} csId:{} rgName:Common Volume Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:3984 2608 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9051(0x235b) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:3984 2608 C The content set is not ready]
    20090529 08:33:33.086 2608 INCO  3566 InConnection::RestartSession Retrying establish contentset session. connId:{} csId:{} csName:common
    20090529 08:33:33.086 2608 INCO   774 [WARN] SessionTask::Step (Ignored) Failed, should have already been processed. Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) InConnection::EstablishSession inconnection.cpp:3657 2608 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:4005 2608 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:3984 2608 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9051(0x235b) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:3984 2608 C The content set is not ready]
    The target server:
    20090529 08:31:33.054 3196 SRTR   784 [WARN] SERVER_EstablishSession Failed on connId:{} csId:{} Error:
    +    [Error:9051(0x235b) UpstreamTransport::EstablishSession upstreamtransport.cpp:707 3196 C The content set is not ready]
    +    [Error:9051(0x235b) OutConnection::EstablishSession outconnection.cpp:2623 3196 C The content set is not ready]
    20090529 08:31:33.974 1664 DOWN  2723 AsyncRpcHandler::ProcessReceive Completion. connId:{} csId:{} reqType:AsyncPollRequest reqState:Completed status:9026 ptr:056820B0
    20090529 08:31:33.974 1664 DOWN  2748 [ERROR] AsyncRpcHandler::ProcessReceive Failed on connId:{} csId:{} reqType:AsyncPollRequest reqState:Completed status:9026 Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2131 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2073 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9026(0x2342) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2073 1664 C The connection is invalid]
    20090529 08:31:33.974 1664 INCO  2543 InConnection::ReConnect Ignoring reconnect. state:4 connId:{}
    20090529 08:31:33.974 1664 RPCN   663 [ERROR] IoPortManager::ThreadEntryProc (Ignored) Failed IoCompletionProcessVvUp. Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ProcessReceive downstreamtransport.cpp:2809 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2131 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2073 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9026(0x2342) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2073 1664 C The connection is invalid]
    20090529 08:30:34.118 2588 INCO  2705 InConnection::ProcessErrorStatus (Ignored) Remote error connId:{} Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 W The requested resource is in use.]
    20090529 08:30:34.118 2588 MEET  2032 Meet::Download Download Succeeded : false updateName:Tutorial_V2_Gerotor_Surfaces_html_6de9f06.png uid:{}-v74168 gvsn:{}-v74168 connId:{} csName:common csId:{}
    20090529 08:30:34.118 1920 INCO  5599 InConnection::LogTransferActivity Failed to receive RAWGET uid:{}-v74169 gvsn:{}-v74169 fileName:Tutorial_V2_Gerotor_Surfaces_html_7153b1c3.png connId:{} csId:{} stagedSize:0 Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 1920 W The requested resource is in use.]
    20090529 08:30:34.118 1920 INCO  2705 InConnection::ProcessErrorStatus (Ignored) Remote error connId:{} Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 1920 W The requested resource is in use.]
    20090529 08:30:34.118 2588 INCO  2705 InConnection::ProcessErrorStatus (Ignored) Remote error connId:{} Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) Meet::InstallStep meet.cpp:1657 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) Meet::Download meet.cpp:2052 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) InConnection::RawGet inconnection.cpp:5688 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 W The requested resource is in use.]
    20090529 08:30:34.118 1920 MEET  2032 Meet::Download Download Succeeded : false updateName:Tutorial_V2_Gerotor_Surfaces_html_7153b1c3.png uid:{}-v74169 gvsn:{}-v74169 connId:{} csName:common csId:{}
    20090529 08:30:34.118 2588 MEET  1263 Meet::Install -> WAIT Error processing update. updateName:Tutorial_V2_Gerotor_Surfaces_html_6de9f06.png uid:{}-v74168 gvsn:{}-v74168 connId:{} csName:common csId:{} code:170 Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) Meet::InstallStep meet.cpp:1657 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) Meet::Download meet.cpp:2052 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) InConnection::RawGet inconnection.cpp:5688 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 W The requested resource is in use.]

  • Drivers for Windows Server 2008 and HDD issues

    Recently I have had the hard drive with my OS fail. After replacing the hard drive and reinstalling windows server 2008 I seem to have run into a few issues with drivers.  After insalling Windows, I had 3 items in my device manager that did not install properly. I was able to get the driver for the LAN port to work but I have not gotten the driver for "Standard VGA Graphics Adapter" and "SM Bus Controller". After a little research, I believe the video card is a Radeon HD4350. With that information I still have been unable toinstlal the correct drivers for either of these items. I've tried several drivers listed on the drivers support page on HP's website but all fo them return the same error about not finding the correct Operating System. The link to the driver I used originally on my previous installation seems to not be valid any longer.
    Also I can't seem to access the two additoinal hard drives (connected by sata). They were used with the previous installation of windows with no issues. They appear in the device manager but do not show up under My Computer. A removeable drive does show up that I'm not sure what it is. Previously I had used software to mirror one of the drives onto the other as to prevent losing data if a drive would fail. Is one of the above drives causing the issue with not being able to access the drives or did the software used before cause the problem?
    Any help on these issues is greatly appreciated.
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    OK.
    I can't help you with the drives then.  That is out of my realm of knowledge.  If they are marked healthy and active in the disk management utility, then that is all I know that they should be indicated.
    As for the graphics driver...
    Download and install this free file utility.
    http://www.7-zip.org/
    After you install 7-zip, right click on the graphics driver file and select 7-zip from the list of options.
    Select 7-zip to Extract to: and let it extract the file into a folder.  I let it extract to the file name of the folder.
    Then just follow the rest of my instructions to install the driver. 
    Of course you will first browse to where 7-zip has extracted the folder to, and proceed from there.

  • A trouble free way of giving Administrators access to redirected folders on Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard?

    A few months ago I set up some redirected folders on a clients Windows Small Busines Server 2008. I recall that setting up the redirected folders was straightforward, but when I edited the permissions to allow administrative access to these server located
    folders, all hell broke lose. The permissions change seemed to trash the folders. I think I managed to 'bodge' it for a couple of users and got it working, but it was such a headache I didn't bother doing it for the other users.
    Now, I sit in front of a brand-spanking-new Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard box which is going to be installed with a new client within 48 hours. I would like to set up redirected folders and would like to grant admin rights on these folders so I can view
    their contents directly from the server.
    It seems to me that there is no offical Microsoft documentation which relates specifically to doing this on Windows Server 2008. Given the amount of problems this has caused for many admins, I am astounded.
    Somewhere there are articles which describe how to do it on 2003, but this procedure does not work well in 2008.
    There is an SBS article that admits permissions can be trashed, but this is no help on Standard edition:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2010/10/08/folder-redirection-in-small-business-server-2008.aspx
    I have just posted a note on this rather long article:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-GB/smallbusinessserver/thread/70fa7f0e-7f2c-4f00-8401-42d262d80cd6
    So, my question, hopefully to Microsoft employee, please can you document
    exactly how to grant admin rights to users redirected folders on Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard, and please could you do it today :-)
    In the absence of this help, then I'm afraid this is yet another great but badly implemented feature that we will not be using.
    Stuart

    Typical Micro$haft answer!
    Quote "Hope this helps!"
    NO IT DOESN'T!
    Did you bother to read the original question?
    Quote "So, my question, hopefully to Microsoft employee, please can you document exactly how
    to grant admin rights to users redirected folders on Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard"
    So, Micro$haft, Why did you give instructions to Server 2003?
    ... When the requester SPECIFICALLY stated: "Somewhere
    there are articles which describe how to do it on 2003, but this procedure does not work well in 2008"

  • Can't install Adobe Reader using Firefox on Windows Server 2008 R2

    I am hoping someone can kindly help me out here.
    Using Firefox I went to http://get.adobe.com/reader/ and clicked the download button and received the Getplus add-on to Firefox.
    When Firefox restarts the getplus window opens but sits there and does nothing with the window remaining blank for ever..
    Each time I try it is the same
    I am logged into Windows Server 2008 R2 as Administrator but it might be a permissions problem as this is a new install of 2008 and seems pretty locked down.
    Thank you in advance

    Are these signs of Adobe failing?
    After subscribing to this forum, I received an email in German from Adobe......................
    Vielen Dank für Ihren Beitritt im Adobe-Club. Als Mitglied können Sie eine Reihe exklusiver Vorteile, Ressourcen und Dienstleistungen in Anspruch nehmen.
    Mitglieder können:
    * unseren Newsletter Adobe Minute Mail (deutsch) abonnieren
    * unseren Newsletter Adobe Edge (englisch) abonnieren
    * Informationen zu ihren Käufen und Transaktionen im Adobe Store aufrufen
    * ihr Adobe-Profil verwalten und aktualisieren
    * in der Adobe Exchange Dateien hoch- und herunterladen
    * Nachrichten in den Adobe-Foren veröffentlichen
    Ihre Adobe-Club-ID lautet
    Um Ihr Adobe-Profil und Ihre Voreinstellungen zu ändern oder um Adobe Edge zu abonnieren, loggen Sie sich einfach ein.
    Whatever, Adobe

  • Windows Server 2008 R2 Slow LAN Transfer (Receive)

    Using Windows 7 Ultimate and Windows Server 2008 R2
    Two machines, connected via 1GB 1000base-T LAN, with a 1Gb switch between... and yes, I've tried swapping cables and ports. Server has two RAID5's, a 6 platter and an 8 platter. Workstation has two RAID5's, a 3 SSD and a 4 platter. Both sides using Intel
    CPU's and a RealTek 8100C chipset Gb LAN, same LAN drivers.
    Using Windows Explorer to COPY a 20GB file:
    Server Disk1 to Server Disk 2: >250MB/s (Server disk I/O isn't an issue).
    Server Disk2 to Server Disk 1: >250MB/s (Server disk I/O isn't an issue).
    Workstation Disk1 to Disk2: >150MB/s (Workstation disk I/O isn't an issue).
    Workstation Disk2 to Disk1: >150MB/s (Workstation disk I/O isn't an issue).
    Server Disk1 to Workstation Disk2: 91MB/s (near 100% LAN utilization).
    All looks good so far:
    Workstation Disk2 to Server Disk2: 25MB/s declining to 17MB/s; occasionally as low as 9MB/s. 
    Some of the changes listed above appeared to work for a few moments. I've seen as high as 90MB/s for a few seconds, but it declines rapidly under 30MB/s... so no fix that has lasted. 
    It appears there is something in Windows 7 that prevents fast transmits; or something in Windows Server 2008 that blocks fast receives. I have set the server-side receive training to disabled, normal, highlyrestricted, and experimental and the Win7 side
    to off, normal, and highlyrestricted in various combinations. Again, nothing concrete to report as an improvement.
    What would the MS Gurus suggest I do with NetMonitor as far as capturing something worth their time to diagnose?

    I've tried disabling auto tuning on the clients with no appreciable effect. The throttling feature however appears to have had an effect - changing the setting from default 10 to 70 has slowed the transfer from 20MB/s down to about an initial 6MB/s that
    has slowed even further, and is now at 3.2MB/s (3% network utilization according to Resource Monitor at both ends of the wire - WS2008R2 and W7).
    Question: What does the 10 (0x0a and 70 (0x46) represent: Mbps on the LAN, or 10% and 70% reserved, or? 
    I'll try the "off" setting of all FF's and add to this.
    In any case, having a backup server that can't be utilized due to client "entertainment media" issues is a little painful... there should be a straightforward and published method to set the network to "normal".
    UPDATE:
    I've tried settings of 0, 10, 70, and FFFFFFFF. 10 might have been best, but only marginally better than 70. Range of time to copy was under 7 minutes to over 8 minutes. Very small difference.
    But I also tried this using Windows Explorer and a Dataset of one folder containing 12.5GB of miscellaneous folders and files - and was surprised.
     - Dataset is at \\WIN7\Dx\ = = Client physical RAID5 drive D:\Dataset
    On WIN7 Client: Share drive D with Everyone as Dx
    On WSvr Server: Share drive D with Everyone as Dx
    On WIN7 Client: Map \\WSvr\Dx to Z:
    On WSvr Server: Map \\WIN7\Dx  to Z:
    On WIN7 Client, using Windows Explorer:
     -- Copy Dataset from Local Drive D: to Network Drive Z:
     -- Took about  8 minutes, with 20% network utilization.
    On WSvr (2008 R2 Server), using Windows Explorer:
     -- Copy Dataset from Network Drive Z: to Local Drive D:
     -- Took about 3 minutes, and 70% network utilization.
    Why does running the copy from the server allow better network utilization and net throughput?
    UPDATE2: 
    I am NOT using HOMEGROUP; I have a dedicated workgroup network the client is a member of, and the server is a DC. I'll eventually try joining the client to the domain and see if that changes anything, but doubt it will so haven't taken the time yet.

  • Oracle R12 on Windows Server 2008

    Hi - does anyone have a good guide or link to a site that does a walk through of installing Oracle R12 on Windows Server 2008?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    Thanks for the guide, anyone with experience in Windows, do you know if the Server goes to sleep, that once it is woken up, that the R12 instance would work fine? I think the application will not be accessible when the server does to sleep.
    I would ideally like to let the Server go to "Sleep" when not in use. Once a user wants to test something, they can wake it up using WOL, then login to the instance.What is the point of letting the server goes to sleep? I would say that you may need to bounce some services then which is not a feasible solution -- You may verify this and try it yourself.
    Regards,
    Hussein

  • Unable to install SQL server 2008 r2 standard edition on windows server 2008 r2 sp1

    I am unable to install sql server 2008 r2 standard edition on windows server 2008 r2 sp1.
     On the Setup Support Files page, choose Install this step I don't get any other window i.e. nothing happens I waited for 5-10 min.  Then I checked the log file.
    Final result:                  Failed: see details below
      Exit code (Decimal):           -2068053929
      Exit facility code:            1212
      Exit error code:               87
      Exit message:                  Failed: see details below
      Start time:                    2014-03-18 14:59:31
      End time:                      2014-03-18 15:00:25
    === Verbose logging started: 3/19/2014  9:45:47  Build type: SHIP UNICODE 5.00.7601.00  Calling process: E:\SQL Server 2008 R2 Standard\x64\setup100.exe ===
    MSI (c) (10:34) [09:45:47:496]: Note: 1: 2203 2: E:\SQL Server 2008 R2 Standard\x64\redist\watson\dw20sharedamd64.msi 3: -2147287038
    MSI (c) (10:34) [09:45:47:496]: MsiOpenPackageEx is returning 2.
    === Verbose logging stopped: 3/19/2014  9:45:47 ===
    Please help As i am running out of time as i have to upgrade TFS for that first step is to install SQL server.

    Hello,
    The following are a few things you can try:
    Copy the media to the local disk drive, unzip it (in case you are installing from an ISO file, and run SQL Server setup from there.
    Try to unregister and register the Windows Installer with the following two commands:
    msiexec /unregister
    msiexec /regserver
    Try to use Process Monitor to log the detailed error produced when the installation of dw20sharedamd64.msi fails. You can download Process Monitor from the following link:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896645
    Share with us the error captured by Process Monitor.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Alberto Morillo
    SQLCoffee.com

  • How to backup VM in HyperV (Windows Server 2008 R2)

    Hello,
    Beginner's question: How to backup my VMs on an external
    USB disk?
    NB: I'm running Windows Server 2008 R2. It's a test machine, don't care with downtime. I want to backup only the VM (VHD files and VM configuration, not the whole server)
    Thanks

    Hello,
    for Hyper-V usage please ask the experts in
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/home?forum=winserverhyperv
    Also see
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd405549(v=vs.85).aspx
    Best regards
    Meinolf Weber
    MVP, MCP, MCTS
    Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
    My Blog: http://blogs.msmvps.com/MWeber
    Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
    Twitter:  

  • 0xC0380013 error while restoring Windows Server 2008 R2 backup

    Hello!
    I have a Bare Metal Backup from phisical mashine with Windows Server 2008 R2 system. The machine has a 500GB disk with 200GB system volume. The disk is configured as dynamic.
    I also have prepared Virtual Mashine with 600GB disk, where I want to restore the backup.
    When I start procedure of restoring (using WinRE) i receive following error:
    0xC0380013 "There is not enough usable space for this operation".
    What is the reason of this error. How should I proceed to recover dynamic disk to virtual machine?
    Thanks for your suggestions!

    Hi,
    On current situation, please refer to following KB and check if can help you.
    "A required CD/DVD drive device driver is missing" or "A media driver your computer needs is missing" error message when you install Windows
    In addition, please check your system BIOS settings. Please refer to following thread and check if can help you.
    A required CD/DVD drive device driver is missing.....
    Best regards,
    Justin Gu
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Joining Windows Server 2008 to Windows Small Business Server 2008

    We have Windows Small Business Server 2008 and it came with a copy of Windows Server 2008 and MS SQL. (A packeged deal from Microsoft).
    Long ago I installed Windows Server 2008 and MS SQL on a computer and joined it with SBS2K8.
    My Windows Small Business Server 2008 crashed and I had to redo it and now I can't get the Windows Server 2008 to join it.
    We are not using the computers for a domain or anything but they are on our network with regular IP addresses.
    The Windows 2008 Server uses the SBS2K8's IP address for it's DNS. The DNS for the  SBS2K8 is 127.0.0.1
    We are using Windows Server 2008 for SolidEdge and MS SQL has to authenticate against the SBS2K8 to run.
    Should I hook both computers up to a switch for their own network to get them talking to each other?
    Do I have to put the Windows 2008 Server name in the SBS2K8 for a user?
    Please advise and thanks.

    Hi:
    Read the warning at the end of this and be sure you follow it.
    Can you explain further this part:  We are not using the computers for a domain or anything but they are on our network with regular IP addresses.
    I ask because SBS MUST be a domain controller or it will not work.  Right click My Computer -  Properties - Computer name tab and let us know if the SBS is "domain" or "workgroup".
    What I expect is the SBS is a Domain, and when you reinstalled it it becomes a new domain, even if it has the same name.  The Server was a member server in the old domain, so the solution to this is to change the Server 2008 with SQL from domain to
    workgroup in the same place as above, then after it restarts rejoin it to the SBS domain by changing it once again to Domain.
    Both the SBS and the Server 2008 should have static ip addresses and the SBS should be the DHCP server for the rest of the network, not your router/firewall.
    Warning:  You MUST check in control panel - users on the Server 2008 to verify you have a local administrative level account and you are positive you know the password for that account.  When the server restarts after being placed into workgroup
    mode the domain administrator will no longer be able to logon to the Server 2008.
    Larry Struckmeyer[SBS-MVP] If your question is answered, please mark the response as the answer so that others can benefit.

  • How to configure ipsec policy on windows server 2008 r2 to permit local machine only access to gateway,one other server and it's local ip?

    I have applied IPsec policy on local machine(ip address:10.82.138.76) with windows server 2008 ent r2 installed,only permit local machine to comunicate with itself,one other server(ip address:10.82.138.77) and the gateway device(ip address:10.82.138.1).After
    i asigned this policy,i can ping the gateway (ip address:10.82.138.1),and the other server(ip address:10.82.138.77),but i can't ping local machine itself(ip address:10.82.138.76),could anybody tell me why and how to solve this problem?When i applied the same
    policy to windows server 2003 ent,i can ping the local machine ip address.

    Hi,
    Thanks for your post.
    First, try to ping the loopback address 127.0.0.1. If the loopback test succeeds but you cannot ping the local IP address, please post the unedited
    ipconfig /all and route print of the problematic computer.
    For test purpose, you may refer to the following lab step by step guide to deployment Tunnel Mode IPsec. Hope it helps.
    Windows Firewall and IPsec Policy Deployment Step-by-Step Guide
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc732400(v=ws.10)
    Connection Security and IPsec
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771593(v=ws.10).aspx
    Connection Security Rule Wizard: Tunnel Endpoints Page - Client-to-Gateway
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd759083
    Best Regards,
    Aiden
    Aiden Cao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Advice needed on installing CA on Windows Server 2008 for CUPS Calendar Integration

    Hi,
    I am trying to configure CUPS 8.0 to connect to Exchange 2008 to retrieve calendar information as detailed in the integration note at the link below:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cups/8_0/english/integration_notes/ExchInt.html
    I have successfully completed everything up to the section Installing the CA on Windows Server      2008 but am now running into problems.
    When I run the Role Services Wizard I get options to install Certificate Authority and  Certificate Authority Web Enrollment but not  Online Responder.
    Can anyone advise why this would be the case?
    It may or may not be relevant but the server that the customer has told me to install the CA on is a domain controller - could this be the issue?

    A bit more information - below is some of the output generated by the Windows systeminfo cli command.
    Host Name:                 DOMDAT02
    OS Name:                   Microsoft® Windows Server® 2008 Standard
    OS Version:                6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001
    OS Manufacturer:           Microsoft Corporation
    OS Configuration:          Primary Domain Controller
    OS Build Type:             Multiprocessor Free
    Registered Owner:          V2C
    Registered Organization:   V2C
    Product ID:                55041-339-2169613-76816
    Original Install Date:     25/01/2009, 18:29:39
    System Boot Time:          11/06/2011, 08:50:34
    System Manufacturer:       VMware, Inc.
    System Model:              VMware Virtual Platform
    System Type:               X86-based PC
    Processor(s):              1 Processor(s) Installed.
                               [01]: x64 Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 10 Genuine ~2494 Mhz
    BIOS Version:              Phoenix Technologies LTD 6.00, 22/09/2009
    Windows Directory:         C:\Windows
    System Directory:          C:\Windows\system32
    Boot Device:               \Device\HarddiskVolume1
    System Locale:             en-gb;English (United Kingdom)
    Input Locale:              en-gb;English (United Kingdom)
    Time Zone:                 (GMT) Greenwich Mean Time : Dublin, Edinburgh,, London
    The server is running Windows Server 2008 Standard and according to the Microsoft doc at the link below this does not support the Online Responder service.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772393(WS.10).aspx
    Could the problem be that I need a server running Windows Server 2008 Enterprise?

  • OCI8 IN WINDOWS SERVER 2008 x64

    Good morning,
    I'm trying to configure Oracle with php in Windows server 2008, but when I try to enable Oci8, the php log shows this error:
    "Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'C:\Program Files (x86)\PHP\ext\php_oci8.dll' - %1 is not a valid Win32 application. in Unknown on line 0"
    So that, the phpinfo doesn't show the enabled module. Doesn't Oci8 work with 64 bytes systems?
    I'll appreciate your help.
    Thank you,

    I have a Windows 2008 x64 server, with 11gR2 (64 bits) and PHP installed. In my case ZendServer 5.0.3. What I did is I replaced, in the ZendServer bin directory, the light dll (oraociicus11.dll) with the full dll of the 32 bit Instant Client (oraociei11.dll). I had to do this because the softlink approach did not work for me, and neither putting an entry in PATH to the 32 bit Instant Client. Maybe ZendServer behaves differently from PHP in this respect.
    My question is, I used to access the local DB (I need to access both a local DB and a remote one) without going through tnsnames.ora, e.g. like this ,
    $c = oci_connect('USER', 'PASS');
    this would connect me directly to the local DB. I cannot do this anymore, I have to give the local information as in $c = oci_connect('USER', 'PASS', '//localhost/SID');
    I tried to set the ORACLE_SID env var but that did not help. Will I not be able anymore to connect locally without the connection string in oci_connect?
    Thanks
    Edited by: francescom on Oct 4, 2010 1:45 AM

Maybe you are looking for