Domains Question

Hello,
ON SDDM 3.1.0.691 - EA3
Windows XP SP3
How can I define a domain in a design and let it remain in the design ?
I already tried many options but the domain always remains in DefautlDomains.
What I have to do to create design domains and commit these domains to the svn repository and share this.
Regards
Nelson

Hell Nelson,
How can I define a domain in a design and let it remain in the design ?Open design, go to domains administration and add domain - there is "Domains File" combo box which allow to select file name or to insert new name - just type file name (without extension) first time and you can select it on next domain. File will be saved in Domains directory under your design directory.
and commit these domains to the svn repository and share this.You also can share default domains - in preferences you can change location of "system types" directory ( domains, logical types, RDBMS sites and scripts are there) - select versioned directory and you can share them as well
Regards,
Philip
PS I think you use DB2/zOS 8, can you check whether DM 3.1 EA3 works with it. Thanks in advance.

Similar Messages

Office 365 Split domain question

Is it possible to run an on-premise Lync hosting 1 SIP domain, with on premise Exchange running a specific email domain say company1.com
Then have Office 365 host two other SIP and email domains. Company2.com and company3.com
I am trying to get my head around this configuration, or if it's even possible.

It's documented by TechNet:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj205157.aspx
For outside documentation, a lot of what I'm seeing is outdated, so TechNet may be your best source for up to date information.
And the answer to the DNS question is, it depends. If you're Office365 only for those sip domains, and on premises only for the other sip domain, it doesn't necessarily even need to be a hybrid deployment. That said, if it is and users can
cross from on premises to off, the DNS records should point at the on premises deployment:
"When creating DNS SRV records for hybrid deployments, the records, _sipfederationtls._tcp.<domain> and _sip._tls.<domain>, should point to the on premises Access Proxy."
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj205403.aspx
Once they hit the on premises, they will be redirected to the online deployment if that's where their account is homed.
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
SWC Unified Communications

Personal Domain Questions

I'm sure this has been answered but I can't find the answer with search...
1. After setting up a personal domain with iWeb is it really publishing the site to your domain requiring you to have a an additional site host? Or is it just interfacing with the domain control to set up forwarding?
2. I've looked at buying a domain from the Yahoo Small Business site. It looks very cheap, does anyone know of any problems with using Yahoo?
3. Do Yahoo Domains allow for masking of the .Mac web addresses?
4. Does anyone have any suggestions for were else to get a Domain name and/or hosting for personal use that doesn't break the bank?
Thanks, Jason

"Thanks a million for sharing your knowledge! "
Let it be known that I've not technically DONE any of this yet. I'm currently building my second iWeb site, and have not yet activated the personal domain service. Instead of sharing my knowledge, it's more accurate to say I'm sharing my speculations and related anecdotal experiences.
Okay, disclaimers aside...
Jason- how are the URLs of the individual pages showing up in the address bar when you surf to your site? Do you get 1) "www.mydomain.com" for all pages (this is called URL Masking, I believe), 2) "www.mydomain.com/mysitename" for all pages, 3) "www.mydomain.com/blog.htm" where each page is named accordingly, or 4) "www.mydomain.com/mysitename/blog.htm" which seems almost as unsightly as the original "homepage.mac.com" version of things.
mitsopa- It looks like you're trying to do what I'm after... You've paid for the domain name at the registrar (one company paid). Any good registrar should be able to handle the DNS, CNAME and MX records you need to change to do this. I would NOT pay the registrar for hosting, unless they charge an additional fee to setup and maintain your DNS records for the domain. -- Next, you've paid Apple for a .Mac user account (2 companies paid). I think this is all the paying that needs to be done. Basically, .Mac has or will become your web host, but NOT your eMail host. If you're happy with [email protected] for your eMail address, you're done. If you need [email protected] type eMail addresses, then you have 3 options: a) setup your own eMail server (a Mini with OS X.4 Server is running my eMail for 6 domains currently...) b) Pay another "hosting company" for eMail hosting - most hosting companies sell you web and eMail hosting as a package. Since you're already paying for web hosting at .Mac, this seems like a waste.) c) Find a free eMail service that will, in effect, host your eMail... I'm hearing good things about Google Apps and the eMail service they provide.
Maria- My first intuition is that it's a DNS propagation issue, and a day's wait will make the problem disappear. I have ISPs up here in Alaska that have taken up to 7 days to get the new IPs and cnames up for their users to access when have moved or setup servers in the past. If that's NOT it, start checking in iWeb as far as where you are trying to publish to. I know in this crazy OS X Mac world, you can publish a website at www.mydomain.com, mac.com/myusername, homepage.mac.com/~myusername, as well as server.ip.address.or.domainname and server.ip.address.or.domainname/~username if you've fired up Apache in your local machine. There's also some silliness about Public folders on Macs and publishing websites to them.... it goes on and on. Basically you can "publish" a website to any directory on any computer that's shared, visible to the world, and has a webserver (Apache) running...
MARIONRR- search the iWeb forum for creating or managing or publishing multiple sites using iWeb. I've not tried yet, but from what I read, it's quite difficult to get iWeb to do multiple separate sites. There's an option of multiple .Mac accounts, but I assume you don't want to go there. Also, I don't know how the .Mac servers are set up, but I would imagine they're pulling off this personal domain name service with some sort of symbolic link (alias) that simply points www.mydomain.com to your pages published with dot Mac. What this means (if I'm correct) is that the answer to your question is "no" since you can't publish two different sites to the same directory.... the "index.htm" page for one site will over-write the "index.htm" for the other...
Sorry to ramble. It's been a long day of snow-shoveling here and I reckon I've only got time for this one post tonight...
-Case
Message was edited by: Case

Advanced Accepted Domain Question

When you install Exchange 2010 into an organization that previously had Exchange 2003, new Active Directory objects are created here:
CN=Accepted Domains,CN=Transport Settings,CN=DemoLab,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=demolab,DC=local
Within each one of these objects there is an attribute called msExchAcceptedDomainFlags. If the value for this attribute is:
·           1 - It’s an External Relay Domain
·           2 - ?
·           8 - It’s an authoritative domain
·           10 - It’s an Internal Relay Domain
·           12 - ?
When I first started working with Exchange 2007, I didn’t realize these were new objects. In fact, I thought when you clicked the Accepted Domains tab in EMC it was just somehow interpreting the previous recipient policies which are located here:
CN=Recipient Policies,CN=DemoLab,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=demolab,DC=local
Each of the recipient policy objects located here has a multi-valued attribute called msExchNonAuthoritativeDomains and another called gatewayProxy.
Instead of making each domain as an object and indicating whether or not it’s one of the 3 above types via flag, the policies simply list all the authoritative domains in gatewayProxy and domains that would otherwise be considered Internal Relay within msExchNonAuthoritativeDomains.
So now that I’ve laid this out, I have a question (a few questions).
A.      At what point during the Exchange install are these objects created?
B.       The objects are obviously created by somehow copying elements of the recipient policies. Are these two objects kept in sync beyond initial creation?
In my example my AD domain is demolab.local. This is also the primary domain used in my recipient policy in 2003. This domain was marked as non-authoritative within the ESM. When Exchange 2010 was introduced, an Accepted Domain object was created, but it was marked as authoritative – not Relay as it should have been.
C.       Why?
I have other domains marked as non-authoritative in the recipient policies as well. However, these did get created properly as relay domains. Why wasn’t demolab.local preserved?
D.      Is it because it also matches the name of my AD forest?
This is easily fixed, (don’t tell me how to change accepted domain types). I’m just looking to better understand this topic.
Mike Crowley: MCT, MCSE, MCTS, MCITP: Enterprise Administrator / Messaging Administrator

For B, it won't let you create a new e-mail address policy for a domain that is not one of the accepted domains, and adding an accepted domain doesn't do anything to e-mail address policies. So I guess the answer is no, not exactly. If you have Exchange 2003 in the mix, I guess B could be answered through the best practice of not using Exchange 2003 management tools to manage organizational settings like recipient/e-mail address policies after installing Exchange 2007/2010.
C & D? Since the domain fqdn in my greenfield lab was marked as authoritative, maybe this is default behavior and it doesn't check first? Ahh, 2003, how I'm forgetting some of the little things, I think by default the domain fqdn is marked as authoritative in the default recipient policy, if so, I'll bet that 90% or more of Exchange 2003 organizations that have the domain fqdn in the recipient policy have it set as authoritative.
Joseph Durnal

Bridge domain questions

Hi everybody.
At work , I have seen a lot of bridge domains configured on a single switch. My question is what is bridge domain and why we use them. An example with configurations will be great.
Thanks and have a great day.

Hi Marvin and Rick
Please consider the following config and questions:
R1# show platform
Interrupt Throttling:
Throttle Count   = 00052552   Timer Count      = 00039372
Netint usec      = 00000800   Netint Mask usec = 00000240
Active           =        0   Configured       =        1
Longest IRQ(usec)= 00003999
MSFC CPU IDPROM:
IDPROM image:
(FRU is 'C7600 MSFC4 Daughterboard')
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
R1#show running-config interface gigabitEthernet 9/7
service instance 1251 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 1251
rewrite ingress tacg pop 1 symmetri
bridge-domain 440
service instance 2001 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 2001
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
bridge-domain 440
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Let say R1 receives a packet with vlan tag 1251 on g9/7. What will happen next? will R1 update its MAc table with source mac?
1)Will there be a mac table for bridge -domain 440? Do we have one-to one correspondence between the two i.e each bridge-domain has its own mac table.?
2)Let say R1 receives a packet with vlan tag 1251 on g9/7. What will happen next? will R1 update its MAc table with source mac?
3) Let say R1 receives a frame with vlan tag 1251 with destination mac ff:ff:ff:ff
What will R1 do next?
4)Will R1 forward it to all service instance in bridge-domain 440 except the one R1 receives the broadcast frame?
( in our case we have two service instances under bridge -domain 440 i.e service instance 1251 ethernet,service instance 2001 ethernet)
5) Will R1 change the vlan tag 1251 to 2001 when forwarding the broadcast frame out of instance 2001?
Appreciate your help.
Thanks

Primary SIP domain Question

Hi,
We’re in strange situation where our AD domain is abc.net but we want primary sip domain to be lync.abc.com & smtp domain is abc.com so email addresses are
[email protected]
So my question is, if I publish the topology for primary sip domain as
lync.abc.com then what could be our challenges in terms of client logon and lync access …? What do I have to have in place to make this work?
Note: Our Lync deployment will be two central sites and each will handle their own specific lync traffic.

You won't hit anything that would won't be able to overcome.
But what is the justification for knowingly making your SIP domain different from your SMTP name space? It's considered best practice to align the two in order to create a simplified user experience and minimise the amount of additional consideration (such
as exchange integration).
Fully appreciate you'll have your own circumstances though, and if this is a requirement - so be it =)
Kind regards
Ben
Note: If you find a post informative, please mark it so using the arrow to the left. If it answers a question you've asked, please mark the thread as answered to aid others when they're looking for solutions to similar problems or queries.
For Fun: Gecko-Studio | For Work:
Nexus Open Systems

Another Domain question

I have three websites. One personal, and two separate ones for work.
For one of the work websites, I wanted use a different domain from GoDaddy.com but I do not want to publish the other sites to this domain name.
1. Is this possible using Mobile me? OR do i have to purchase web hosting from them for this one site?
2. If it is possible for just the one website, how do I do it?
Sorry if this is a repeat question, I could not find the answers...

If you have 3 Sites you can publish them independently to either MobileME, with FTP to a remote server or to a folder.
Select the Sitename in the Sidebar and choose one of the options in the popupmenu.
If all sites are published at the same account at MobileMe they all have the same domainname.
With MobileMe you can enable only one domainname.

Some general domain questions

Hi,
Can some one clear my mind on this, we did some tests the other day and want to check...
We have 3 domain controllers 2008 R2, A, B and C. A and B are located in the same site, Site London, C is located in another site, Site NewYork. forrest and domain functional level are 2008 r2.
- When we powered down domain controller A and B, should not C take over when users logon ? I have check the replication, and its ok between the sites, take 15 minutes before a user account for examlple is replicated. Should not the users in the site for
domain controller A and B only noticed delay on logon (or no delay at all?) ? Does it fails because domain controller A that has all the FSMO roles is down?
- When a user logs on to a domain i can check with the command "echo %logonserver%" which domain controller this users authenticated agains right? There should not be any prefered domain controller for A and B right, this was before when you had
like primary and secondary domain controller i guess. It seems like every clients and servers in the site London authenticates against domain controller A, why is that, is it because this server has all the FSMO roles or since this is the primary DNS
server ?
- Another thing we noticed, was when the domain controller A was down, it was slow loggin on, but there where authenticated against domain controller B at last, but why slow ?
- Another question that not directly related, the customer is using a lot of applications that uses DCOM, they complain that when both domain controllers in site london is down, it fails to authenticate... does this DCOM has any kind of time out values,
sorry my DCOM knowledge is lack..
Thanks for answers and followup.
/Regards Andreas

Hi Andreas,
Based on your description, when the DC A and DC B of site London powered down, all users in London site can’t logon, that is to say, the DC C didn’t take over.
Could users in NewYork site log on normally? Which errors did domain users of London sites get when they logon?
If all configurations are correct, when DC A and B powered down, C should take over when users logon. And all FSMO roles in one DC is not a good choice when we have several
DCs.
To troubleshoot this issue,
Please check the DNS configurations of DNS server and DNS client in London Site at first. Such as if you configured DNS forwarders, and if the preferred DNS server and
alternate DNS server of DCs were configured correctly. You could use dcdiag /test:DNS command to check DNS issues in your DC.
Please run
repadmin /replsummary or repadmin /showrepl command to double check if the AD replicate has any problems.
For more details, please refer to the articles below,
Repadmin /replsummary
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc835092.aspx
Repadmin /showrepl
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc742066.aspx
Best Regards,
Tina

VTP Domain question, collapsed Backbone

Hi All,
I have to redesign our network.
Reading lots of books, there are still questions...
Suppose I have a classic collapsed backbone with a Server farm and a access layer for the users.
The server will be in one VLan (= /24 subnet), the users in multiple other VLans.
Are the Server farm and the User Vlans in the same or in diferent VTP Domains?
Is it at all possible to have multiple VTP domains in a collapsed Backbone?
Thanks
Willem

A switch can only be part of one VTP domain at any given time, however, you can have multiple VTP domains in your network. As the previous post states, VTP is used to manage VLANS. So, if you have VTP Domain A, switches that are part of that VTP domain will monitor VLANs associated with VTP Domain A. Switches in VTP Domain B will monitor VLANs associated with VTP domain B.
The main purpose of VTP is to keep you from manually having to configure the same VLANs on a bunch of switches. Depening on the size of your network and how often VLANs change, it may or may not be worth using VTP.
If you do use VTP, be careful if you are changing parameters in a live environment...you can lose all of your VLANs...I've done that before and it wasn't fun.

Multiple Domains - Question Again

I personally do not like going the html forwarding routine for the second iWeb site, since the URL that shows up is the full path of my mobileme account. It is not really professional.
I find it odd that in its advertisement for iLife 09, it says you can publish to multiple sites using iWeb. Well, I could do that with iWeb 08 if you are using html forwarding. So, how does iWeb 09 really change anything?????
I would imagine that if I demand CNAME option (which I will insist upon), then I would have to buy another mobile me account Right? And that would be odd - since I would bet there will be confusion on my hard drive.
Thanks

You could user HTML forwarding with masking for the other sites and then you'd only have your domain name in the URL window for each page of the site.
Another option would be to use a 3rd party hosting service like HostExcellence.com or GoDaddy.com where you could have your domain name and sub domains.
It's the content and appearance of a site that will bring visitors back to a site and not what's in the URL window. The domain name does it job by providing an easy, informative URL to use the first time to get to a site. From then on one can bookmark pages that are of interest and not have to worry about the full URL.
If you use a family pack they create a user account on your Mac for each of the MMe accounts in the pack. That way you won't have to log out of one MMe account, into the next when you want to work on a different site. Just enable fast user switching so you can quickly change accounts.
Click to view full size
If your sites are commercial sites I would use a 3rd party hosting service. MMe has too much social overhead associated with its servers. 3rd party hosting packages will also have email accounts associated with them that could match your domain name.
OT

Mail Service With Internal vs External Domain Question

I have a SLS setup with a private domain ex: server.acmewidgets.private
The local dns resolves correctly
I have a static IP for this server and I would like it to handle the email for my domain which is ex: acmewidgets.com
(Currently acmewidgets.com has been having it's website and email handled by an external source)
Do I need to reinstall the SLS with the domain server.acmewidgets.com to get the email working correctly? Or do I simply just point the MX Records to the static IP of server.acmewidgets.private?
If I do not need to reinstall, what needs to be done to create the flow of email in and out of the SLS?

No need to re-install Snow Leopard Server, you will need however to configure a few things.
First up you will need to configure the Mail service to accept mail for this external domain as at the moment it will be configured to only accept mail for your local domain.
In *Server Admin*, go to the Mail section and click on Advanced, now click on Hosting. In the hosting section you can add as many domains as you like for the mail server to accept mail for, the simplest way is to add the domains as virtual hosts.
Point your external MX records to the address for the server so that mail will be directed to your server. If your server is on a fixed external IP address then all done.
If your server is behind a firewall and on a private IP address you will need to forward port 25 on your firewall to the Snow Leopard Server. If you are also running DNS you should create a new Zone for your external domain with MX records that point to your Snow Leopard Server as clients will need to know that your server is the final delivery destination for that domain. If your server really is on a live fixed external IP address this step is not necessary.

Iweb/domain question

I own a domain that i wish to put my iweb page onto. I work for my uncle doing all of his web stuff for his plastic surgery business in orange county. I made a site about breast cancer and own a domain and would like to put my iweb page on my domain named ocbreastcare.com
in short terms all i want is:
1. i own a domain name
2. i have a iweb website registered and on the net
3. i want to make it so when people type in the domain name i have reserved, it goes directly to the site i made with iweb.
If anyone knows if this can be done, please get back to me asap and let me know what exactly what i can and can't do to make this possible or if it even is possible.

Go to your domain name account and set up "Domain Forwarding" or "Domain Redirection". If your domain account does not offer this, then transfer your domain somewhere else.

Personal domain question

I have set up a new website in iWeb '08 and have gone through the steps listed on the .Mac site to have a domain name I purchased through Yahoo Business work with it. As directed, I went to the Yahoo site and set the CName to point to web.mac.com.
The actual site is http://web.mac.com/rmansfield/GoSP/Blog/Blog.html
www.gardensofstationpointe.com correctly takes me there.
However, simply gardensofstationpointe.com (note the absense of "www") takes me to the default Yahoo "under construction" page. Why is this? Or have I just not given things enough time to fully kick in?

simply gardensofstationpointe.com (note the absense of "www") takes me to the default Yahoo "under construction" page.
You can probably fix this by forwarding gardensofstationpointe.com to the www version.

.mac and personal domain question

I'm sure this has been addressed several times, although, I can't find the answer in a quick search...
I set-up a personal domain on my account. I have several websites going in iWeb, however. Can I still host my personal domain on .mac, but still publish my other sites to my .mac url? How do I switch back-n-forth between my .mac url and my personal domain without messing things up?!
Thanks so much for the help!
Cheers,
Lilly
Message was edited by: TXlillypad

How do I switch iWeb to publish to my .mac rather than my personal domain? Is that possible?
iWeb always publishes to .Mac, nowhere else, regardless of what it says somewhere in the app. You can always reach all your sites via the url http://web.mac.com/username/sitename.

Search domain question.

I keep having problems with Entourage. It shows connected but does not send or receive mail. I have been fixing it by going into the search domain settings under network and adding my domain lacrossefootwear.net. How do I get this to be populated when the user boots up there systems? I notice that this setting is removed after a couple of days or so and I have to go back to the same people and reset it. Is this a xserve server setting or a file on the individual computers that needs to be modified?

I tout the Java community all the time. Honestly, this is the first time you all have let me down ;)
Anyway, the issue with the code is that the init method is called twice (once by the applet environment and once in my code). This was causing the JTrees/SplitFrames to be added twice.
Thanks for nothing! ;)

Domains Question

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for