Doubt in ME59N

Hi Seniors,
i have a requirement where i need to create PO's per cost center in ME59N. For example, if i have 10 PR's with cost center A and 10 PR's with cost center B, when i run ME59N, if i have field " per cost center " check box activated, it will convert the PR's in to 2 PO's according to cost center. But in ME59N, there is no such field "per cost center " available. Could you please suggest how to get the settings/field in ME59N?
Regards,
Prajay

Hi tej,
Thanks for your reply. They are very particular about "Per Cost Center". Is there any way to get this?
Regards,
Prajay
Edited by: prajay83 on Mar 6, 2012 6:59 AM

Similar Messages

Automatic PO, transaction ME59N, with 2 Vendors

Hello gúrus,
I have a doubt.
Is it possible to create a purchase order from a purchase requisition, where the purchase requisition has assigned 2 Vendors?
An example:
I have a Purchase Requisition where different items have different Vendor:
Item 1 Vendor A
Item 2 Vendor B
Then, I want to create an automatic PO, through the transaction ME59N, but, I cannot.
The system shows the message: No suitable purchase requisitions found
So, how can I create an automatic PO where the purchase requisition has 2 vendors assigned?
I suppose that the transaction ME59N needs to create 2 purchase order, one by Vendor.
Thanks for your time and support and I will wait your answer a.s.a.p.
Regards,
Sandra Palomo

Hello again,
Where I can put this split per item in the purchase requisition?
Is the split edited by SPRO?
Thanks for your time!
Regards,
Sandra Palomo

Doubt in fbl1n transaction

hi i have a doubt....
in fbl1n transaction, there are open items and cleared items.
in it the cleared items for certain document types such as invoice etc is not present in the open item table (bsik)
however the cleared items for document types such as general voucher its present in the open items table (bsik)
is this possible as all cleared item entries shld b present in the open item table with an indicator set for cleared or not...
plz exlain!

Hi
There are 2 tables(open and Closed Items) in FI for Account Payables and Account Receivables and GL accounts
1.Account payables: BSIK is Open Items and BSAK is Closed items
2.Account Receivables; BSID and BSAD for OPEN and closed items
3/GL accounts : BSIS and BSAS for Open and Closed Items
Reward points for useful Answers
Regards
Anji

Doubt in creation of a new object

Hi All,
I have one doubt in creation of a new object.If a new object is to be created and it is not a subtype
of any existing object, then what should we enter in the Program field for creating the object?
I hope I am clear with my question.
Thanks in Advance,
Saket.

Hi Saket,
Following will be required for created a custom business object.
1. Object Type - ZTEST (Internal Techincal Key)
2. Object Name - ZTESTNAME (Technical Key Name)
3. Name - TEST (Name of BO, it is used while selecting the object type)
4. Description - (Short Description of BO)
5. Program - ZTESTPROGRAM (ABAP program in which the methods of the object type are implemented)
6. Application - A or B.. etc (Area to which your BO is related)
Please remember that you can learn these basic things by giving F1 help on those fields and in HELP.SAP.COM.
Regards,
Gautham Paspala

Wrong document type is processed form ME59N - Automatic PO creation Efected

Dear Friends,
Im facing one issue while the PO is created from Purchase requistion(ME59N).
If the purchase requisition document type is - XTB while creation of PO from ME59N the document type is taking as UB
the SPRO setting has been done for supplying plant and receving pant as - XTB but still getting the error as
Doc. type XTBshould be used for suppl. plant XXXX and receiving plant XXXX. 06 - 674 ( Msg class and No)
Could any one please help me on this.
The manual PO creation(ME21N) is perfect .
Regards
Kumar.

Hi Mauro,
Thank you for the very helpful answer, i suggested my team to impliment the OSS note.
Thanks for your help.
One similar kind of issue i am facing, i implimented one enhancement in the BADI "ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST" for checking the supplying plant.
When i processd it through ME21N ( manulaly) it's taking the right plant, But when i processed it through ME59 ( Autoamtion of PO) the Enhancement is not triggered.
ME59N is not supporting as there is no support pack ( OSS notes need to be implimented).
Coluld you please provide any helpful answer for me
Thanks for your support and Help.
Regards
Ravi.

Error during automatic po creation ME59N

Dear All,
Following errors has been shown after automatic po creation by ME59N:-
Message text Message Class Message Number
PO could not be created
PO header data still faulty MEPO 2
Enter Validity End ME 83
Enter Latest GR Date ME 83
Can delivery date be met? ME 40
Requisition could not be converted
Please suggest how to solve above .
with regards,
Pradeep Bhardwaj

Hi
From the messages it seems that system is expecting a Validity end date at PO header & Latest GR date at item level.
Do you have these two fields as required in the PO??
If these are required fields then you need to have process to populate them automatically (Programatically) to resolve the error.
Thanx
Prasad

ME59N Automatic PO creation

When i try to create PR into PO with Tcode ME59N....
error it is showing Requisition could not be converted
I checked in Both Material master and vendor master also i have selected Automatic PO check box..
Pls guide me....

Hi,
Please follow the below steps to create automatic PO using ME59N transaction
1. In material master Automatic PO check box to be checked (Already done in our case)
2. In vendor Master under purchasing view check the box Automatic Purchase order (Already done in our case)
3. Maintain the list of sources available for the given material with plant combination
4. Maintain the Purchase Info record for all the vendors which are maintained in the above Source list with the material combination
5. While creating the PR under source of supply tab click on Assign source (We are doing this as we have multiple sources for our material) . Save the PR
6. Execute the transaction ME59N and provide the source (vendor number) and plant . System will automatically create a Purchase order for the vendor.
Do follow the above steps and let us know if you are able to create a PO
Regards
Pavan

Error during automatic PO creation by PR (ME59N)

Dear All,
Following errors has been shown after automatic po creation by ME59N:-
Message text     Message Class Message Number
PO could not be created
PO header data still faulty        MEPO               2
Enter Validity End        ME              83
Enter Latest GR Date        ME              83
Can delivery date be met?        ME              40
Requisition could not be converted
Please suggest how to solve above .
with regards,
Pradeep Bhardwaj

Hello,
to check the errors issued I suggest to try to create the PO converting the PR from transaction ME21N.
I guess that some fields, mandatory for the PO creation, were not filled in the Purchase Request and could not be determined in any different way. If you can't maintain them on the PR you should set them as optional, if possible, in the customizing for Screen lay-out of transaction ME59N, under "Materials Management --> Purchasing --> Purchase Order --> Define Screen Layout at Document Level".
Hope to be useful.
Best regards,
Andrea

Automatic PO creation from PR ME59N

HI,
We are creating PO's after the PR is duly approved as per the relaese strategy.
Can we use automatic creation functionality to reduce the manula inputs and errors.
regards,
ab

Hi,
Yes you can create Automatic PO from PR Via ME59N.
but for this you have to check Automatic PO in both purchasing View of Material Master and Vender master .
also maintian Purchse Info Record with T code ME11 for value and tax code and
source of Supply in ME01 and assign source of Suppy in PR and release PR and
go to ME59N to create automatic PO with that PR.
But remember that you can not put additional Conditions in PO for E.g. ur fright charges and Packaging and forwarding charges via automatic PO.
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Doubt in sender mail adapter

Hi Everyone,
Can we read and validate the attachment of the mail.If so how to do it.
Thanks in advance,
Sakthi

Hi Sakthi,
Please refere the below links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/ad/bf93409c663228e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/0d/52b240ac052817e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Let me know if you have any doubts regarding this.
Thanks,
sekhar.

PI' RFC Connection pool doubt.

Hi PI exports:
i have a doubt about pi' RFC Connection pool ,pi RFC receive channel can set the conn pool size ,but when start the rfc receiver channel ,is there always only one Connection pool ,or there is only one Connection pool instance?
thinks
Edited by: kevin liang on Oct 19, 2009 6:45 AM

Hi,
Connection poolins size means how many number of connection you want to make open to send data to ECC, We can define maximum number of connection in Receiver RFC Adapter,Go to additional parameters section and define Max Number of connection give the number there,thats it.Internally it works as Connection poolin mechanism.
Regards,
Raj

Small Doubt Regarding SY-MANDT

Hi All,
     SELECT changenr FROM cdhdr CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_cdhdr
                                         WHERE mandant = syst-mandt
                                         AND   objectclas = 'MATERIAL'
                                         AND   objectid   = wa_matl-matnr
                                         AND   tcode      = 'MM02'.
     I have written the select stament as shown above.
     In this i have a doubt like adding a field sy-mandt in the where condition will increase the Efficiency of program or not.
regards,
raghu.

Hi..
No doubt the efficency would be affected but from business point of view there will many things that need to be checked as in:
If you are viewing data from CDHDR and CDPOS which is client specific then you are not viewing complete data.
These tables give us and document changes made to a particular object in SAP but if anything is cross client like company code(lets assume) then changes to it wont be visible in all the clients..
so there can be some key information you can miss out while working on some of the objects.
else in this case its good to make query cross client.
regards
vishal

Doubts with control break statements on internal table loops (AT/ENDAT)

Hi, i've had a couple of doubts for a long while which I hope someone can clarify today:
1) I know how to use the AT statements, however, i'm not sure I get correctly what this part of help regarding this commands means:
"The control level structure with internal tables is static. It corresponds exactly to the sequence of columns in the internal table (from left to right). In this context, the criteria according to which you sort the internal table are unimportant."
I've always sorted the internal table before the control break and it works that way. For example:
SORT ITAB BY EBELN EBELP.
LOOP AT ITAB.
AT NEW EBELN.
* Code for the order header
ENDAT.
ENDLOOP.
If I don't sort the internal table, it doesn't work! (i get dupplicated processing). In the example, if i have more than one register with the same EBELN and they're not consecutive, the header gets processed twice. I really don't get that part of the help text.
2) I know this: "At the start of a new control level (i.e. immediately after AT), the following occurs in the output area of the current LOOP statement:
All character type fields (on the right) are filled with "*" after the current control level key.
All other fields (on the right) are set to their initial values after the current control level key."
My doubt is: WHY is that this way? Because sometimes (most times) I need those fields INSIDE the statement! So when that happened i've solved it in one of three ways:
LOOP AT ITAB INTO WA_ITAB.
WA_ITAB_AUX = WA_ITAB.
AT NEW FIELD.
 WA_ITAB = WA_ITAB_AUX.
* ...Rest of the code for the first register
ENDAT.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT ITAB INTO WA_ITAB.
AT NEW FIELD.
 READ TABLE ITAB INDEX SY-TABIX INTO WA_ITAB.
* ...Rest of the code for the first register
ENDAT.
ENDLOOP.
* (Without AT)
LOOP AT ITAB INTO WA_ITAB.
IF WA_ITAB-FIELD <> FIELD_AUX.
 FIELD_AUX = WA_ITAB_FIELD.
* ...Rest of the code for the first register
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Is there any problem with this way of coding? Can be done better?
Thank you very much in advance.

Hi..,
1)
See if u sort the table on a field on which u r using AT ENDAT .. then all the records which are having the same value for that field will form a group or those reocrds will be at one place.. so when u sort the table for all the records AT ENDAT will get executed onli once..
If u dont sort this table on this field then all these records will be at different places and in between there may be records with different value for this field.. so this AT ENDAT will get executed for each record !!
2)
No u cannot use the Right hand fields of the field in the table .. Because these AT events work as Group based operations... So till that field on which AT ENDAT is working it breaks that record into two groups.. One is the left hand fields including that field.. and right hand fields as another group.. and makes the right hand group as stars ****. Thats y u can observe that even any one field in the left hand group changes the AT ENDAT will get executed !!!!
Hope u understood !!!
regards,
sai ramesh

LOOP DOUBT INSIDE PACKAGE

CREATE PACKAGE EMP_PKG AS
CURSOR EMP_CUR IS
SELECT EMPNO,DEPTNO,SAL,HIREDATE
FROM EMP
WHERE DEPTNO=30;
PROCEDURE P_EMP;
PROCEDURE P_GET_SAL(V_EMPNO NUMBER);
PROCEDURE P_GET_LOC(V_EMPNO NUMBER);
Now inside my Package Body
INSIDE THE MAINPROCEDURE P_EMP
I WILL BE CALLING THE BELOW TWO PROCEDURES
PROCEDURE P_EMP
BEGIN
FOR I IN EMP_CUR LOOP
P_GET_SAL(I.EMPNO);-- DO I NEED TO LOOP AGAIN IN P_GET_SAL PROC?
P_GET_LOC(I.DEPTNO);
END LOOP;
END;
NOW WHAT IAM DOING IS
in my P_GET_SAL Procedure is
PROCEDURE P_GET_SAL(V_EMPNO NUMBER)
V_SAL EMP.SAL%TYPE;
BEGIN
FOR I IN EMP_CUR LOOP
SELECT SAL INTO V_SAL FROM EMP
WHERE EMPNO=I.EMPNO --DOUBT HERE
END;
I WANT TO KNOW WHETHER I NEED TO LOOP AGAIN
HERE OR INSTEAD OF THAT
PROCEDURE P_GET_SAL(V_EMPNO NUMBER)
V_SAL EMP.SAL%TYPE;
BEGIN
SELECT SAL INTO V_SAL FROM EMP
WHERE EMPNO =V_EMPNO;
END;
SINCE iam calling V_EMPNO WITH CURSOR FROM MY
MAINPROCEDURE ..
WILL THE PROCEDURE USES THE CURSOR VALUES
AND LOOP ITSELF FOR EVERY EMPLOYEE TO
GET THE SALALRY ?
PLEASE LET ME KNOW SINCE MY PACKAGE IS MORE THAN 3000
LINES I cant proceed unless its confirmed i can
do so ..

Hi all,
Thanks for Looking into my Problem
I Got answer by MySelf ..i dont need to loop again my sub procedures
if i try to do that iam getting the error
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06511: PL/SQL: cursor already open
Thank you all once again ..

Doubt on Rows and Coloums in BEx Query Designer.

Hello, Experts.
I have a Doubt in BEx Query Designer.
In the Rows I have a Fiscal year Period, if the user enters the Fiscal year period for e.g. : 001/2006 .
in the columns i have forecast for the Fiscal year period which user entered ( 001/2006 ),   and we have another column pervious ( Prior )fiscal year period ( 001/2005 ).
My Questions is , as we are Restricting with 001/2006 will the query retrieve the values of 2005 or not?
Thanks in Advance .
Sharp

yes i am Doing Offest.
I moved this Fiscal year Period to Free char,   and i Restricted with Pervious Fical Year period and Fical year period . it worked. but
when i kept this in Rows and deleted Previous Fiscal Year period . it is displaying blanks.   in prior years forecast.
is it because i am Ristricting it to only fical year period which user entered
         Colums--> Forcast ( User Entered year )          Prior year
Rows
Fiscal year period
Fiscal year period( user enterd )
Thanks

Doubt in ME59N

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for