Doubt on BSEG table

hi ,
why sap stored BSEG table as cluster table ,
is there any specific reason .
plz tell me if any body knows ,
thanks in advance ,
regards ,
srinivas

hii
see this article
http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/sap/db2/archives/select-from-bsegrfblg-performance-problem-14247
read last paragraph.i hope you will get your answer
thx
twinkal

Similar Messages

BSEG Table maintenance

Dear SD Gurus,
We are not able to see entries related to Material and material quantity in BSEG table. I am not sure why these entries are not coming in this table.
As far as my knowledge goes BSEG table is a cluster table and an important part of the Accounting Document Segment.
It comes in picture whenever there is a movement type of material such as 601 is involved i.e. at the time of PGI or PGR, i have my doubts over u201Chow it is skipping data insertion in this table?u201D
Could anybody let me know from where and how BSEG table fatched material and its quantity.
Thanks in advance. Suitable Text Removed
Regards
Vinod Kumar
Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Jan 28, 2011 9:16 PM
Dont offer anything

Its happening after transporting some requests in Dec 2010
In that case, you need to take the list of those requests and check which particular request relates to changes in SD table that parallely affects BSEG table.
You can also check from document flow for that Accounting document whether values are posted correctly in FI. As a random test, take a billing document for which an Accounting document is generated and check in FB03 how many line items are flowing. Next go to SE16 / BSEG and check whether you could see all those line items in this table.
Meanwhile, you can also check from those transport requests what changes were made in which SD tables.
Perhaps, you can also have a look at the following notes which may help you.
1) Note 10083 - BSIS missing for G/L account
2) Note 401646 - New DataSources for Line Items from FI-GL, FI-AP, FI-AR
3) Note 416076 - SELECT FOR UPDATE does not lock cluster tables
4) Note 608340 - SAP Cons.: No quantity update in subsequent posting from FI
5) Note 677630 - Correcting functional areas in FI documents
6) Note 685688 - Release of "old" invoices as of SAP R/3 Enterprise
7) Note 1497911 - F-26: All items not selected
In case, you could find out the root cause, please update the forum without fail which will be very helpful to all.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

BSEG table data load problem

Hi friends,
I have a problem where I need to load the BSEG table data but when it loads only one million records, it stuck and gives error. there are more than 5 millions records in it. is there any way to load the data to PSA. I doubt it is due to memory but how I increase the memory or enhancement for loading the data.
Thanks
Ahmed

Hi Ahmed....
Don't load all the data in a single go..............split the load with selection...........If it is a Transaction data datasource..........then copy the same infopackage..........in the Data selection field give the selection.........and execute them parallely.............since fact table will never loack each other....
If it a Master data datasource......then don't run paralley..............since master data table locks each other..........just give the selection one by one.........and load the data.....
Hope this helps......
Regards,
Debjani.....

F110 - Grouping the vendor invoices by BSEG table fields

Hi,
I want to group the vendor invoices while making the payment through F110, based on a BSEG table field. The settings in Grouping Key configuration (OBAP) only allows me to choose the fileds from BSIK table and not possible to select the fields from BSEG table. Is there any other way to group the vendor invoices based on BSEG fileds? How can we achieve this requirement in SAP?
Thanks and Regards
Koteswararao padarti

Hi,
I created the substitution and also grouping key based on the BSIK-KIDNO filed. But the system is not able to group the vendor invoices by payment reference. I already tried the following options
Seperate Payments for each Ref in FBZP settings
Can anyone let me know what is missing in the configuration to group the invoices for payment by payment reference.
Regards
Koteswararao Padarti

XREF3 field not getting populated in BSEG table while posting MIRO

Hi,
I have one query in MIRO tcode.I have activated xref3 field in MIRO tcode using enhancement LMR1MF6Q.Now when i try to post document with some values in xref3 field on screen ,value is not getting populated in BSEG table.Please tell me what else needs to be done to achieve this ?
any hint on this?
Thanks & Regards,
Soniya S.

Hi,
1.- According to SAP Note 904652 - MIRO: Different from FB60
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/904652
MIRO is an independent Materials Management (MM) transaction that does not
claim to be the same as the accounting transactions (such as FB60 or FB01).
MIRO was developed to allow users to process vendor invoices within the
context of the MM procurement processes as simply as possible.
For this reason, among other differences, the field selection was limited
to the absolutely necessary. For example, the following fields from the
accounting document are not available in Transaction MIRO (this list is not
complete):
Reference key (BSEG-XREF1, -XREF 2, -XREF 3)
2.- SAP Note 1156325 - BAdIs in the Logistics Invoice Verification environment
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1156325
Have a look at badi MRM_ITEM_CUSTFIELDS.
This badi will create a new tab at item level in order to display the new fields.
I haven´t used this badi so i cannot talk from experience here.
Think twice before deciding.
Best regards.

Error while activating the BSEG table

hi guys ,
today i joined SAP SCN . I have this error
First i appended a structure of 5 fields in BSEG table .Then i tried to delete this append structure.
But while deletiing it took nearly 20-25 minutes to process and timed out.So the structure is deleted
from BSEG table but those 5 fields are still present in view V_QCMBSEG .Because of this BSEG table
is now partially active .what should i do other than access key .

Dear Deepak,
welcome to SCN.
How did you append structure in BSEG without access key, if you had appended you must have done it will access key as it is a standard table.
secondly, the time out error is because BSEG is a cluster table, and the data volume in Bseg is very large as all the accounting document from various module is stored in this table, hence while deleting it system will check each line item wise before activating the table.
Now the workaround is to check with your basis team to increase the memory index so that time out dump is eradicted and BSG becomes Active.
Best practice: Don't append structure to standard table unless it is very crucial. if you are doing it for some report, kindly do a table join ( BSEG cannot be used as it is a cluster), you will get the same data in various secondary index table, by doing this the performance of the report will be better.
Regards,
M S Lokesh

Error while appending structure into BSEG Table

We had appended BSEG table with a ZSTRUCTURE to enable Custom field in MIRO. Subsequently there was a change required in the appended field. After Changing the field there was adjustment required to activate the appended table . However due to slow system performance during that time the Adjustment SE14 timed out. And created inconsistency in BSEG table.
If I Do the Table adjustment now it is showing below error.
We tried to delete the append structure also but the structure is not appearing in the append structure list to delete.
Even if we try deleting the Z structure from se11 it is throwing below error.
Any one could help me out to resolve this..

hi Ramesh,
Please First Check if the Database version and disctionary version are in sync.
Also, it could be the case that you would have enhanced an already existing Append stucture. which might be being used in other BKPF dependent tables.
Please check

PO Line Item Number not filled in BSEG Table

HI,
While posting to goods receipt through MIGO FI documents are generated.
For these FI documents , in BSEG table the corresponding PO line item numbers (EBELP )are not getting filled up,
How can they be filled. can it be done through any standard configuration?

Hi,
Check if you are doing the summarization of FI doc. You can check reading these notes:
SAP Note 36353 - AC interface: Summarizing FI documents
SAP Note 77161 - Summarization of FI postings w.ref.to purchase orders
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

FBL5N t code and BSEG table is showing wrong contract number

Hi,
The proces flow is contract number>sales order>DMR-->Invoice
Now when I am checking the VBFA table it's showing correct contract number against invoices but FBL5N t code and BSEG table are showing wrong contract numbers.
Why FBL5N and BSEG table is showing wrong contract number?
Currently we are using one enhancement and user exit is used to incorporate one customized field as identifier for bill type.
1. During the billing document release to accounting VFX3, The user exit triggering and it is update the customized fields and Net settlement indicator.
2. Using the Invoice number, get the fields VGBEL(Document number of the reference document) and VGPOS (Item number of the reference item) from VBRP and read table VBAP with VBELN and POSNR, to get DMR number (Sales Document) that created for the Invoice.
3. Use fields VGBEL and VGPOS on table VBAP to get the sale order number.
4. By using the Sales order number, get the Distribution channel to update Net indicator field
In accounting table BSEG-UZAWE = JF must be updated on the customer line.
5. Retrieve the sale order number and item level to get customized field from table VBAP
Any pointers.
Thanks
Ashu

Hi Reazuddin,
Thanks for your reply,
I am concercerned about BSEG table and using user exit EXIT_SAPLV60B_008 to post the document in FI.
Now in we have enhanced this user exit for contracts and included in this way.
SELECT SINGLE ZZ_CONTRACT FROM VBAK INTO (LC_CONTRACT) WHERE VBELN EQ cvbrp-vgbel.
Endloop.
*Moving the values to final accounting table
loop at xaccit.
xaccit-vertn = lc_contract.
xaccit-VBEL2 = xaccit-AUBEL.
xaccit-xref3 = lc_vbel2.
MODIFY xaccit .
ENDLOOP.
Clear: lc_contract,lc_vgbel,lc_vgpos,lc_vbel2.
But I am getting correct data when checked other clients( development and quality), this problem I am getting in production.
Do I need to ask the ABAP'er to debug this enhancement in production?
Thanks
Ashutosh

Data fetching from BSEG table

Hi,
I have used smartforms for generating suppler payment statement for financial department. more time duration is taken by the program when it is generating.
I think this problem comes while data fetching from BSEG table. because, it has more records for one vendor ID.
I want reduce this time duration.
Please guide me.

Have you tried this selection in se16? I'm quite sure that It will take
a long time.
The problem has been explained in this group before and I think you
should search for bseg in the answers given.
As a hint: It has to do with the selection universe. You are restricting
only bukrs from the primary key (all the other restrictions in your
where clause are filters that are applied on SAP's side (not on the
database side)). The problem is that bseg isn't stored as separated
fields in the RDBMS, but as a table with the primary key and a stream of
bits in a raw field.
You should review and change the logic you're using before reading bseg.
It's the only way you'll improve the performance of this select. (for
example, you could use one or more secondary index tables - bi or ba
to retrieve belnr and access bseg with a better where clause).

Update BSEG table for PERNR

Hi,
How to update PERNR Field BSEG Table?
My scenario is to update the (Personnel Number ) PERNR Field in FB50 Transaction.
I get the following fields details from a third party system
Document Information
o     I_BUKRS (Company Code) u2013 example: 0010
o     I_BELNR (Document Number) u2013 example: 1700006041
o     I_GJAHR (Fiscal Year) u2013 example: 2008
u2022     Final Approver ID
o     I_PERNR (Personnel No.) u2013 example U0050049
For all line items of the document (represented by the key (I_BUKRS, I_BELNR, I_GJAHR)) need to update the BSEG-PERNR field in FB50.
Please let me know if you have any ideas like BAPI's or any alternative.
Thanks & Regards,
Satya

Hi
Try to use below the FM's
FMUDBSEGH_UPDATE
FMUDBSEG_UPDATE
G_BKPF_BSEG_UPDATE
before to that you need to read data from FM READ_BSEG. then update.
hope it helps you
Thanks!
Edited by: Prasanth Maddela on Apr 21, 2009 6:26 PM

Bseg Table Issue

Hi,
Below is my code, it taking much time to get the data from BSEG table and even after executing for long time it not populating the data into internal table. If i pass single account in selection screen, it is displaying the data.
Please help me out.
SELECT hkont lkorr FROM t030hb INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF
                      TABLE gt_tr_t030hb
                      WHERE ktopl = 'ZCOA'
                      AND   bwber = 'TR'
                      and hkont in so_hkont.
IF gp_pprct IS INITIAL.
loop at gt_tr_t030hb.
    SELECT hkont prctr bewar dmbe2 FROM bseg INTO CORRESPONDING
                       FIELDS OF table gt_hkont for all entries
                       in gt_tr_t030hb
                       WHERE bukrs IN so_bukrs
                       AND prctr IN so_prctr
                       AND saknr = gt_tr_t030hb-hkont
                       AND vbund IN so_vbund
                       and gjahr in so_gjahr
                       and xauto = 'X'.
Thanks,
Pavan.
Message was edited by: Pavan Panduru

Hi
Try to select the items from BSIS/BSAS:
- One solution can be:
TABLES: BSIS.
DATA: GT_TR_T030HB LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF T030HB.
SELECT-OPTIONS: SO_BUKRS FOR BSIS-BUKRS,
                SO_HKONT FOR BSIS-HKONT,
                SO_GJAHR FOR BSIS-GJAHR,
                SO_PRCTR FOR BSIS-PRCTR,
                SO_VBUND FOR BSIS-VBUND.
DATA: BEGIN OF GT_HKONT OCCURS 0,
        BUKRS LIKE BSIS-BUKRS,
        HKONT LIKE BSIS-HKONT,
        GJAHR LIKE BSIS-GJAHR,
        BELNR LIKE BSIS-BELNR,
        BUZEI LIKE BSIS-BUZEI,
        PRCTR LIKE BSIS-PRCTR,
        BEWAR LIKE BSIS-BEWAR,
        DMBE2 LIKE BSIS-DMBE2,
      END OF GT_HKONT.
DATA: XAUTO.
SELECT * FROM T030HB INTO TABLE GT_TR_T030HB
                    WHERE HKONT IN SO_HKONT
Open Items (BSIS)
SELECT BUKRS HKONT GJAHR BELNR BUZEI
       PRCTR BEWAR DMBE2
       FROM BSIS INTO TABLE GT_HKONT
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN GT_TR_T030HB
                      WHERE BUKRS IN SO_BUKRS
                        AND HKONT = GT_TR_T030HB-HKONT
                        AND GJAHR IN SO_GJAHR
                        AND PRCTR IN SO_PRCTR
                        AND VBUND IN SO_VBUND.
Cleared items
SELECT BUKRS HKONT GJAHR BELNR BUZEI
       PRCTR BEWAR DMBE2
       FROM BSAS APPENDING TABLE GT_HKONT
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN GT_TR_T030HB
                      WHERE BUKRS IN SO_BUKRS
                        AND HKONT = GT_TR_T030HB-HKONT
                        AND GJAHR IN SO_GJAHR
                        AND PRCTR IN SO_PRCTR
                        AND VBUND IN SO_VBUND.
If you need to check if the item is automatically loaded:
LOOP AT GT_HKONT.
SELECT SINGLE XAUTO FROM BSEG INTO XAUTO
                                WHERE BUKRS = GT_HKONT-BUKRS
                                  AND BELNR = GT_HKONT-BELNR
                                  AND GJAHR = GT_HKONT-GJAHR
                                  AND BUZEI = GT_HKONT-BUZEI.
IF XAUTO = SPACE.
    DELETE GT_HKONT.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Other solution can be
TABLES: BSIS.
DATA: GT_TR_T030HB LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF T030HB.
SELECT-OPTIONS: SO_BUKRS FOR BSIS-BUKRS,
                SO_HKONT FOR BSIS-HKONT,
                SO_GJAHR FOR BSIS-GJAHR,
                SO_PRCTR FOR BSIS-PRCTR,
                SO_VBUND FOR BSIS-VBUND.
DATA: BEGIN OF T_DOCUMENT OCCURS 0,
        BUKRS LIKE BSIS-BUKRS,
        GJAHR LIKE BSIS-GJAHR,
        BELNR LIKE BSIS-BELNR,
        BUZEI LIKE BSIS-BUZEI,
      END   OF T_DOCUMENT.
DATA: BEGIN OF GT_HKONT OCCURS 0,
        HKONT LIKE BSIS-HKONT,
        PRCTR LIKE BSIS-PRCTR,
        BEWAR LIKE BSIS-BEWAR,
        DMBE2 LIKE BSIS-DMBE2,
      END OF GT_HKONT.
DATA: XAUTO.
Open Items (BSIS)
SELECT BUKRS GJAHR BELNR BUZEI
       FROM BSIS INTO TABLE T_DOCUMENT
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN GT_TR_T030HB
                      WHERE BUKRS IN SO_BUKRS
                        AND HKONT = GT_TR_T030HB-HKONT
                        AND GJAHR IN SO_GJAHR
                        AND PRCTR IN SO_PRCTR
                        AND VBUND IN SO_VBUND.
Cleared items
SELECT BUKRS GJAHR BELNR BUZEI
       FROM BSAS INTO TABLE T_DOCUMENT
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN GT_TR_T030HB
                      WHERE BUKRS IN SO_BUKRS
                        AND HKONT = GT_TR_T030HB-HKONT
                        AND GJAHR IN SO_GJAHR
                        AND PRCTR IN SO_PRCTR
                        AND VBUND IN SO_VBUND.
Auto items
SELECT HKONT PRCTR BEWAR DMBE2
       FROM BSEG INTO TABLE GT_HKONT
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_DOCUMENT
                      WHERE BUKRS = T_DOCUMENT-BUKRS
                        AND BELNR = T_DOCUMENT-BELNR
                        AND GJAHR = T_DOCUMENT-GJAHR
                        AND BUZEI = T_DOCUMENT-BUZEI
                        AND XAUTO = 'X'.
Try
Max

Down load from BSEG Table

Hi
Friends
we have around 50 millions records in the Bseg table.
i need to down load only 5 fields .
one our friend suggested using ABAP code we can down load.
But i would like to know from you is there any Transcation code to down load only 4 or 5 fields from bseg fro all the company codes since we have around 50 million Records inthe table.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Ravindra,
Good afternoon and greetings,
In SE16 itself you can down only the selected field by choosing the User Parameters...Alternatively, you can create a query using SQVI and select only those fields for displaying and downloading.
If you require any assistance on SQVI, please let me know.
Points awarded is highly appreciated, if the above mentioned solution meets your requirement.
Thanking you
With kindest regards
Ramesh Padmanabhan
Consultant

ST05 Trace on a select query on BSEG table

hi all,
this is my select query on table BSEG table:
SELECT bukrs
         belnr
         gjahr
         buzei
         KOART
         mwskz
         kostl
         lifnr
         aufnr
         werks
         ebeln
         txjcd
         projk FROM bseg
               INTO TABLE i_bseg
               FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_ad_tab
              WHERE bukrs EQ i_ad_tab-bukrs AND
                    belnr EQ i_ad_tab-belnr AND
                    gjahr EQ i_ad_tab-gjahr.
when i m doing SQL trace ST05 on this query and in the detail statement showed the following query
SELECT
"MANDT" , "BUKRS" , "BELNR" , "GJAHR" , "PAGENO" , "TIMESTMP" ,
"PAGELG" , "VARDATA"
FROM
"RFBLG"
WHERE
"MANDT" = ? AND "BUKRS" = ? AND "BELNR" = ? AND "GJAHR" = ?
ORDER BY
"MANDT" , "BUKRS" , "BELNR" , "GJAHR" , "PAGENO"
what is RFBLG table in SE11, but could not find it.
what is RFBLG?also, the above select query giving me performance issues.. the "for all entries" clause is used as per norms...
please suggest a solution..

hi
good
The famous BSEG table is a cluster table.
It is as was correctly stated part of the Accounting Document Segment. It is part of the Pool cluster RFBLG and lives in the package: FBAS (Financial accounting 'Basis').
You can't read a cluster table exactly the way you read a database (old speak, transparent table).
You can use a program to read called RFPPWF05
Note 435694: Display BSEG item by calling FB09D (modified FB09)
Other possiblity: Other possibility: CALL DIALOG 'RF_ZEILEN_ANZEIGE', but since this is a dialog I don't think this would work.
In any event go to FBAS Package (development class) to see your business objects, class library and functions.
you must use keyfields bukrs , belnr, gjahr
(so 1st select table bkpf) to select bseg.
or use secondary index tables:
bsas, bsis, bsik, bsak, bsid, bsad
Regards,
Raj.

How to improve performance by pulling data instead of BSEG table?

Hi,
We are facing issue in which we have to pull material no for some non copa postings.
But if we use BSEG table then serious performance issues are coming up..
so are there any other tables / combination of tables that we can look for instead of BSEG?

Hi,
BSEG is Cluster table, you can only select with key fields.
if you have a select:
select belnr budat wrbtr from bseg
          into table it_bseg
           where bukrs = bukrs
               and belnr = belnr
               and gjahr = gjahr
               and bschl = 31.
it's much better to select of this way:
select belnr budat wrbtr from bseg
          into table it_bseg
           where bukrs = bukrs
               and belnr = belnr
               and gjahr = gjahr.
delete it_bseg where bschl ne '31'.
Regards,
Fernando

Doubt on BSEG table

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for