Doubt regarding Transporting Design Objects

Hi all,
While transporting the design objects from DEV to QAS, iam doing in the following way
1) i am doing transport Namespace wise individually and exported one by one.These all interfaces involved with IDOCs
2) When i import into Quality Design, i am not able to see the  IDOCs under Imported Objects.
How to proceed further??
Regards

Hello Arpil,
Now to itroduce this SWC dependencies is too late for le, because we have UK & North America objects also.
If i introduce this Dependencies concept now, i have to change for those UK & North America things too.
Is there any other way for this??
Importing the IDOC Definition again ???
any how i have to change the Control record values in QAS system to point QAS control record detail
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Doubt in transporting the objects

    HI all,
            I have a doubt in transporting the objects,
    I have made changes in Function module's include program only , Should i have to transport the include prog alone or the whole the FM itself,
    Please suggest
    Thanks in Advance,
    Kumaran.C

    hi
    hope it will help you.
    reward if help.
    Use the following BAPI's:
    BAPI_OBJCL_GETDETAIL
    BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE
    or use the fun module:
    CLAF_CLASSIFICATION_OF_OBJECTS.

  • REGARDING TRANSPORTATION OF OBJECTS

    hello friends,
    I NEED INFO REGARDING TRANSPORT INFO
    first i transported the datasources from source system(dev) to source system(quality) and then i replicated them in to the bw(quality) system. after that i given the source system mappings in the bw(quality system) and then i started transporting the objects independently in the following manner.
    transport connections:
    collection mode: (start manual collection)
    and then i collected all infoobjects and clicked on the gather dependent objects ( the option which is available for the start manual collection option in the collection mode tab) and then i set a package and then i transported . in the same manner i created transport requests seperately under the same package for the infosources , datatargets,update rules. and then i released the requests and in the quality system we successfully imported the objects(infoobj,infosources etc....). but one infoobject for example 'X' which is a dependent attribute for the another infoobject 'Y' is inactive in the quality system(bw). but X is active in the bw(dev) and when i imported the object it exists inn the bw(quality) but in inactive mode. because of this all the dependent objects like datatargets are not active. once again i released the infoobject 'X' [which is active in bw(dev)] seperately by creating a seperate request and then imported but still it is inactive. i tried several times but i am failed. shall i install that infoobject('X' infoobject ) from business content(in bw quality). if i do so does it effect all the imported objects. pls let me know.
    thanks & regards,
    harish

    dear bwer and anand raj and friends,
    when i am trying to import '0crm_f_cust'(X) object i am getting the following error
      Start of the after-import method for object type R3TR IOBJ (Activation Mode)
      Error/warning in dict. activator, detailed log    > Detail
      Value table /BI0/SCRM_F_CUST is not active
      Search help /BI0/OCRM_F_CUST is not active or does not have parameters
      Enhancement category for table missing
      Enhancement category for table missing
      No active nametab exists for /BI0/SCRM_F_CUST
      Termination due to inconsistencies
      Table /BI0/SCRM_F_CUST (Statements could not be generated)
      Flag: 'Incorrect enhancement category' could not be updated
      Enhancement category for table missing
      Table /BI0/SCRM_F_CUST is not a database table => not suitable as selection method
      Row type /BI0/SCRM_F_CUST is not active or does not exist
      Table /BI0/SCRM_F_CUST is either not active or inconsistent
      Srch Help /BI0/OCRM_F_CUST could not be activated
      Table /BI0/SCRM_F_CUST could not be activated
      Table Type /BI0/WSCRM_F_CUST could not be activated
      View /BI0/RCRM_F_CUST could not be activated
      Domain /BI0/OCRM_F_CUST was activated (error in the dependencies)
      Data Element /BI0/OICRM_F_CUST was activated (error in the dependencies)
      Return code..............: 8
      DDIC Object TABL /BI0/SCRM_F_CUST has not been activated
      Error when activating InfoObject 0CRM_F_CUST
      Start of the after-import method for object type R3TR IOBJ (Delete Mode)
      Errors occurred during post-handling RS_AFTER_IMPORT for IOBJ L
      RS_AFTER_IMPORT belongs to package RS
      The errors affect the following components:
         BW-WHM (Warehouse Management)
      Post-import method RS_AFTER_IMPORT completed for IOBJ L, date and time: 20060620132453
    pls let me know the solution.
    regards,
    harish

  • Doubts : Regarding Transportation

    Hi XI Gurus,
    I want to know more about Transportation mechamism of XI.
    As per my knowledge one is File system based(a lot of manual work ::( another one is CMS.
    1. Pros and Cons of File System/CMS Transport ?
    2. For Transporting IR and ID Objects above two mechamism is fine.But what about other objects used in a scenario :
       a) ABAP objects created in Application System like RFC/Report/RFC Destinations.
      b) Information of Business Systems/Tech Systems with SWCV in SLD ?
    Regards,

    Transporting Objects
    Hey
    for FMS,suppose u have a BS called BS_File_IDOC_Dev which uses the IS of dev,now u create one more BS with the name BS_File_IDOC_Qa which uses the IS of QA,when u go in transport tab or BS_File_IDOC_dev u will find an option traget system,there u can give BS_File_IDOC_Qa,now when u move the objects from Dev to QA,u will automatically see the QA BS instead of Dev BS.this way u dont have to to change BS names manually in QA or Prd
    For more infermation go thru these links:
    using CMS system. in XI
    1. /people/sap.india5/blog/2005/11/03/xi-software-logistics-1-sld-preparation
    2. /people/sap.india5/blog/2005/11/09/xi-software-logistics-ii-overview
    3. /people/sap.india5/blog/2005/11/28/xi-software-logistics-solution-iii-cms
    4. /people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/11/02/overview-of-transition-from-dev-to-qa-in-xi --> Overview of Transition from Dev to QA in XI
    5. /people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/20/inconsistencies-while-transporting-rfc-objects-from-dev-to-qa-150-sp12
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9e76e511-0d01-0010-5c9d-9f768d644808
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/93/a3a74046033913e10000000a155106/content.htm --> Transporting XI Objects
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ef/a21e3e0987760be10000000a114084/content.htm --> Configuring Groups and Transport Targets
    Look into this blog for how to export / improt IR and ID objects,
    /people/sap.india5/blog/2005/11/09/xi-software-logistics-ii-overview
    /people/sap.india5/blog/2005/11/03/xi-software-logistics-1-sld-preparation
    Please go through these links which actualy show you how to configure CMS and also gives you all information regarding it.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/43f5d790-0201-0010-2984-ff72d822b109
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/de/a4214174abef23e10000000a155106/content.htm
    /people/daniel.wirbser/blog/2005/10/27/tcsfilecreateexception--error-while-assembly-of-software-components-in-nwdi
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/f6/719a2172f74b67b150612a7cd3b7df/content.htm
    http://www.sap-hefte.de/download/dateien/964/074_lesesprobe.pdf
    I hope it helps...
    reward points if helpful
    regards
    sreeni

  • Very basic doubt regarding transporting abap developments

    Hi All,
    It may be very basic doubt, But I need an answer.
    If we develop some objects in the development and transported them to quality and for some reason some errors occured and the for correction of the errors we created some more requests and ported them to Quality.
    the number of requests are say more than 15. and if we lost track of sequece of the requests to be ported to production.
    How can we overcome this problem?
    Can we create a new transport request by right clicking the package (of course all the objects are in only one package) , this will solve the purpose. I mean to say if we transport this single request to quality then to production, all the things will get transported?
    Please give your valuable inputs..
    Thanks and Regards
    KK

    Hi All,
    I really appreciate all your quick replys.
    My question is if we create a new request from the package in SE80, can we leave the old requests,
    That is if I transport a request say req 2 of domain for solving the dependency error of the previous request say req1 ( of data element ). and again transport req 1 after transporting req 2, this will solve the dependency problem. Like this if some dependency related issues are there and we lose track of sequence of request which needs to be transported, what could be the ideal solution?
    So I mean to ask that if I create a new request for the package in SE80, will all the developments will be included in the request or do we need to follow the sequence only?
    Thanks and regards
    KK

  • Doubt regarding transports

    Hi All,
    I have replicated my datasources in 3.x in BWP,When I am transporting my transformations to BWP from BWV will system automatically migrate DS to 7 ? or  shall I have to migrate it manually ??
    Regards
      KK

    Hi KK,
    No problem there, meaning no local migration needed.
    Just transport the R/3 datasources.
    While replicating on the target system (R/3 prod) just choose "datasource" for the migrated sources. (I am even not sure whether the system will still ask, I cannot remember)
    The BI content transport will handle the rest.
    Please beware of possible transport errors with message RSO296 for migrated datasources. This message can be ignored, the objects are transported ok.
    More details in note 987480.
    regards,
    Olav

  • Doubts while transporting objects into QA

    Hi,
    I has completed the Development and need to transport it to Quality.
    Here i has written 4 UDFs based on the conditions on Mapping.
    Could you please let me know while transporting the objects from DEV to QA ...shall i need to take extra care on UDFs.
    Pls let me know the process if i really need to transport UDF's also into QA system.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Y.Raj.

    Hi,
    In addition to the functional implementation like mapping hard-coded values specfic to landscape, you must take an extra care on the following scenarios
    1. If you are implementing any RFC look up - connection parameters may change
    2. If you use value mapping - value group names may change
    3. Enhanced receiver determination - receiver business system names may change
    No extra care is needed if its a simple code that maps fields without expecting any runtime variations.
    Thanks,
    Karthik

  • Doubts in transportations?

    Hello All
    Having some doubts in transportations?
    1)Does functional module level configuration come under workbench request or customizing request?
    2) Under One request how many tasks can be placed?
    regards
    balji

    dear Balaji,
    check sap help
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/57/38e1824eb711d182bf0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/4b/b155e40c3e11d3959a00a0c930dcc1/frameset.htm
    So that you can differentiate between global changes to the system and client-specific Customizing settings, the CTS records your changes in either a Workbench request or a Customizing request:
    Workbench Requests
    When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
    Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
    Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
    Customizing requests
    Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
    Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
    Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually.
    also check this thread
    Transports
    hope this helps.

  • Doubt in Database Design

    Hi,
    I have got some doubt in database design. I am designing a database for Inventory Management. Wherein i need to store the order details in one to many relationship. I have designed my tables as follows (Just sample)
    -- Tbl_OrderOne
    OrderCode (PK)
    OrderDate
    CustomerInfo
    -- Tbl_OrderMany
    OrderCode (FK)
    ItemCode
    Qty
    What doubt i have got is, since oracle has the features like creating objects and use them as data type and store the data.
    Can i use this feature in this case. Here in this case trasactions will be very high. Does it affect the performance. But presently i have designed it using foreign key reference as i showed you in the beginning. If using the Objects to store that huge number of data is feasible and increases the performance, then i can go for Object type feature.
    Thanx in Advance
    Regards
    Vinayak
    null

    Vinayak,
    One more thing. You can check out more information about NESTED TABLE at http://otn.oracle.com/docs/products/oracle8i/doc_library/817_doc/appdev.817/a76976/adobjdes.htm#446526
    Regards,
    Geoff

  • Issue related to transportation of objects

    Hi Experts,
    I am very new to BODS tool.I have an issue related to transportation of Objects.
    Please be noted that , there was already a project (X) existing in dev system and the same project (X) is already exists in quality system as well.
    Now we got the requirement to replace the new source table to the existing source table in one of the dataflowin the Project(X). So in dev system for the same project (X) ,we have created a new datastore and imported a new source table into that datstore and used this table in that particular Dataflow to replace the existing table in the same project(X).
    After doine this changes, its working fine in Dev system.
    Now I wanted this changes to be transported in qual system as well.
    So I have logged into Designer in quality system. In central repoistory, I was able to see two central repositories.One for Central Repoistory of DEV and Other Central Repoistory of Quality.I hope I need to view Central Repoistory of Dev( please correct me If .In this central repository(dev) I was able to view the same Project(X) but the latest changes were not reflected ( I mean to say new datastore and new source table in the dataflow were not been seen). So I have refreshed the central repoistory,still I was unable to view the latest changes in the same project(X).
    Could anyone please guide me, what all steps I need to do, to get this changes reflected in quality system as well.
    Please be noted that, I am working on BODS 4.2 version
    Appreciate for your quick responses.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Cris,
    First remember that when ever you are doing changes in existing project first you have to take the latest version of that project then you can do your changes.
    Step1: Take latest version of code from Central Repository of DEV  into your local repository then do yuor changes.
    Go to Tools---->Central Repositories then select Central Repository of DEV then activate it. then get latest project from Central Repository of DEV.
    Getting latest project from central---->Go to Tools---->Central repository library---> select your project---->rightclict---get latest version--->objects and depence.
    I am not sure you made changes in latest code or not?
    Step2: After you made changes in your local repo go to Tools---->Central repository library---> select your project---->rightclict---checkout-----objects and depence without replacement.
    Step3: Go to Tools---->Central repository library---> select your project---->rightclict---checkin-----objects and depence. Now your changes moved to Central Repository of DEV.
    Step4: Login to Quality system.
    Step5: In Qaulity---Go to Tools---->Central Repositories then select Central Repository of DEV then activate it. then get latest project from Central Repository of DEV to Qaulity system.
    Getting latest project from central---->Go to Tools---->Central repository library---> select your project---->rightclict---get latest version--->objects and depence.
    Now Latest code transported to QA.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Balamurugan G

  • Doubt in Transport Request

    Dear Gurus,
    I have one doubt in transport. My production system has gone live 2 years. Everything is woriking fine. Now in my source system side, they want to increase length for 3 objects (Length 8 to 10).
    In development part, we have completed everything and now we are ready to transport. At the time of transport,whether we want to delete data in that 3 objects in production or it will enhance without giving any trouble?
    In that 3 objects, 2 objects having alpha conversion.
    Kindly provide your inputs.
    Regards,
    Vivek.V

    Hi,
    For the ones having conversion routine, you shouldn't face any problems. For the one that dosen't it'll basically start pulling data with the modified lengths from the day it goes into Production with the new lenths, but for the already existing data, it won't change the lenghts. If you want to have the existing data with the new lengths, then you need to back out and reload.
    Also, your transport from Dev to Prod might take time depending on the volume of that you currently have in those info objects.
    Cheers,
    Kedar

  • While transporting the objects from dev to q or production what are the err

    Hi all,
    While transporting the objects from one system to another what are the errors we get?
    Thanks
    Kiran Kumar

    Hi Kiran,
    The purpose of the Forums is to help people with problems, not to "fish" for answers to what appear to be interview questions. There are many ways to become educated in SAP Administration, such as training classes and help documetnation. Please choose these avenues for your questions instead of making these kind of posts in the Forums.
    Best Regards,
    Matt

  • Error while transporting ID objects via CTS

    Dear All,
    I am facing some issue in Transporting ID objects from Dev to Q.
    We have a Central SLD for Dev and Qual. Prod has a different SLD.
    I have used Transport targets in SLD to point the Dev to Qual and Qual to Prod.
    After this, I created Business Systems in Integration Directory using the Bus Systems from SLD.
    When I try to *export these Business Systems in Integration Directory from Dev to Q via CTS * then  I get the fol error:
    >>>cation Component   NDPL_File_Dummy_P: Obligatorytransport target for business system NDPL_File_Dum
    >>>my_P not found in System Landscape Directory
    >>>on: Import failed because of business system transfer of object Communication Component   NDPL_File
    >>>_Dummy_P: Obligatory transport target for businesssystem NDPL_File_Dummy_P not found in System Land
    >>>scape Directory
    >>>stprocessTransport(TransportPostprocessor.java:67)
    >>>rocessing.InternalImportPostprocessorDir.postprocess30And70Import(InternalImportPostprocessorDir.jav
    >>>a:93)
    >>>rocess(AInternalPostprocessorDir.java:146)
    >>>g.gen.DirPostprocessor.doPostprocessing(DirPostprocessor.java:95)
    >>>apt.XIDirPropagationProvider.transportFinished(XIDirPropagationProvider.java:96)
    >>>server.transport.impl.pvc.GenPvcTransport.genPvcImport(GenPvcTransport.java:75)
    >>>r.server.transport.impl.pvc.DirPvcTransport.pvcImport(DirPvcTransport.java:74)
    >>>rver.transport.impl.service.TransportServiceImpl.pvcImport(TransportServiceImpl.java:876)
    >>>p.aii.ib.server.transport.impl.service.TransportServiceImpl.importZippedStream(TransportServiceImpl.
    >>>java:991)
    >>>portServiceImpl.java:773)
    >>>D_WRITE_VERSIONSET(CmsHmiMethods.java:534)
    >>>s.process(CmsHmiMethods.java:131)
    >>>isServiceImpl.java:167)
    >>>at com.sap.aii.utilxi.hmis.sbeans.HmisBeanImpl.process(HmisBeanImpl.java:98)
    >>>edMethodAccessor490_10000.invoke(Unknown Source)
    Please help...
    regards,
    Piyush

    >
    Piyush Mathur SAP wrote:
    >  >>>cation Component   NDPL_File_Dummy_P: Obligatorytransport target for business system NDPL_File_Dum
    >  >>>my_P not found in System Landscape Directory
    h
    has the transport path been set? you should have the target BS in the QA SLD present

  • Error while Transporting ID objects

    Hi,
    I have transported IR objects correctly from dev to QA environment, but when Im trying to transport ID objects, its giving me error saying that the Business System is not available.
    I am using File Based Transport.
    Regards
    Sudhir.

    HI Sudhir
    As said above
    You need to create the Business system if its not there in SLD. If it exist then it require a cache refresh as XI is not identifying the business system.
    You need to set SLD source and target system so that in future it works automatic to identify the target system.
    Thanks
    Gaurav

  • Doubt regarding  ALE SETTINGS in IDOC scenario.

    Hi Friends,
            I have some doubts regarding ALE settings for IDOC scenarios,  can anyone  please clarify my doubts.
    For exmaple take IDOC to FILE scenario
    The knowledge i got from SDN is --
    One need to do at the  R3 side is  --- RFC DESTINATION (SM59)  for the XI system.
                                                       --- TRFC PORT  for sending IDOC  to the  XI system
                                                       --- CREATING LOGICAL SYSTEM
                                                       --- CREATING PARTNER PROFILE 
                   at the XI side is  --- RFC  Destination ( For SAP sender system)
                                           --- CREATING  PORT  for receiving IDOC from the SAP sending system(IDX1).
    1. Do we create two logical systems for both Sender ( R3 system ) and Receiver( XI system ) in R3 system itself or in XI system or in both systems we create these logical systems? Is this a mandatory step in doing ALE configurations?
    In IDOC to IDOC scenario-------
      2.  Do we craete two RFC destinations in XI system? One RFC DESTINATION for the Sender R3 system and another RFC DESTINATION for the Receiver R3 System? and do we create RFC DESTINATION for the XI system in receiver R3 system? If not.....y we don't create like this........Please give me some clarity on this.............
      3.  If we use IDOC adapter ,since IDOC adapter resides on the ABAP STACK ,we don't need sender communication channel ,for the similar reason----
    y we r creating receiver communication channel in the case of FILE to IDOC scenario?
      4. Can any one please provide me the ALE settings for IDOC to FILE scenario,
                                                                                    FILE to IDOC scenario,                                                                               
    IDOC to IDOC scenario individually.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ramana.

    hi,
    1. Yes, we create two logical systems for both Sender ( R3 system ) and Receiver( XI system ) in R3 system itself and
    it is a mandatory step in doing ALE configurations
    2. We create 1 RFC destination each in R3 and XI.
        R3 RFC destination points to Xi and
        XI RFC destination  points to R3
    3 We need to create Communication Channel for Idoc receiver as the receiver channel is always required but sender may not be necessary
    4. ALE settings for all IDOC scenarios are same  as follows....
    Steps for ALE settings:-
    Steps for XI
    Step 1)
         Goto SM59.
         Create new RFC destination of type 3(Abap connection).
         Give a suitable name and description.
         Give the Ip address of the R3 system.
         Give the system number.
         Give the gateway host name and gateway service (3300 + system number).
         Go to the logon security tab.
         Give the lang, client, username and password.
         Test connection and remote logon.
    Step 2)
         Goto IDX1.
         Create a new port.
         Give the port name.
         Give the client number for the R3 system.
         Select the created Rfc Destination.
    Step 3)
         Goto IDX2
         Create a new Meta data.
         Give the Idoc type.
         Select the created port.
    Steps for R3.
    Step 1)
         Goto SM59.
         Create new RFC destination of type 3(Abap connection).
         Give a suitable name and description.
         Give the Ip address of the XI system.
         Give the system number.
         Give the gateway host name and gateway service (3300 + system number).
         Go to the logon security tab.
         Give the lang, client, username and password.
         Test connection and remote logon.
    Step 2)
         Goto WE21.
         Create a port under transactional RFC.(R3->XI)
         Designate the RFC destination created in prev step.
    Step 3)
         Goto SALE.
         Basic settings->Logical Systems->Define logical system.
         Create two logical systems(one for XI and the other for R3)
         Basic settings->Logical Systems->Assign logical system.
         Assign the R3 logical system to respective client.
    Step 4)
         Goto WE20.
         Partner type LS.
         Create two partner profile(one for XI the other for R3).
         Give the outbound or inbound message type based on the direction.
    Step 5)
         Goto WE19
         Give the basic type and execute.
         fill in the required fields.
         Goto IDOC->edit control records.
         Give the following values.(Receiver port,partner no.,part type and sender Partner no. and type)
         Click outbound processing.
    Step 6)
         Go to SM58
         if there are any messages then there is some error in execution.
         Goto WE02.
         Check the status of the IDOC.
         Goto WE47.
         TO decode the status code.
    Step 7)
         Not mandatory.
         Goto BD64.
         Click on Create model view.
         Add message type.
    BD87 to check the status of IDOC.
    In case if not authorized then go to the target system and check in SU53, see for the missing object
    and assign it to the user.
    SAP r3
    sm59(status check)(no message)
    WE02(status check)
    WE05(status check)
    BD87(status check)
    Xi
    IDx5(Idoc check)
    SU53(authorization check)
    Reward points if helpful
    Prashant

Maybe you are looking for

  • Battery life issue - MacBook Air

    Hi there, could you please help me? I have an issue in my MacBook Air battery life. it doesn't last more 2:30 hours. below is the report of Etresoft application. Hardware Information:           MacBook Air (13-inch, Mid 2012)           MacBook Air -

  • How to create a group including several  roles?

    Hi experts, Hereby a simple question but urgent, that is, how to create a group in portal which includes several roles. For exemple a group for manager contented the roles for managers and another group for employees. Thus it simplifies the role assi

  • Spinning wheel everytime I click on something. Help?!

    I'm trying to update my software to OS X 10.6.4 to download iTunes version 9.2 so I can update my iPhone 3gs to ios4. My macbook pro is running so slow, that whenever I click on something the spinning wheel comes up and basically freezes my computer

  • Withholding tax calculated by line item

    Hi all, I am trying to test the withholding tax for vendors.  My question is, if the invoice has many line items, and not all line items are subject to withholding tax due to its transaction nature, is it possible to select which items are applicable

  • Patch uninstall not working properly developed using InstallShield

    Hi i have created a patch for my product using installshield , when apply the patch product files gets updated successfully when trying to uninstall the patch it unisnttall or removes successfully newly added dlls to the patch from the target m/c but