Doubts in Classic Scenario

Hi Friends,
i am having a doubt...
Let’s say in classic scenario
1) SHC created in SRM
2) PO replicated in ECC in Editable mode & in display
mode in SRM
Question 1:
If I change PO qty in ECC(as its in editable mode) will it get updated in SRM PO?(i.e changes we do in PO at ECC level will be updated in SRM?)
Question 2:
If I do Goods receipt & Invoice in ECC  for the same PO will it replicated in SRM as GC and Invoice against the PO?
Thanks,
San

Hi Konstantin,
Thanks for the resonse...
My question is..
In classic scenario we have editable PO in ECC & Non Editable PO in SRM(Display Mode) am i correct?
If i am correct...
Lets say in classic scenario i have created PO-XYZ for 100 Qty from SHC?It will be editable in ECC and non editable in SRM,so i go and change PO -XYZ qty in ECC as 80 qty or 120 qty,this changes we did in ECC will be updated in PO-XYZ available in SRM(in display mode)???
Similary
Lets say in classic scenario i have created PO-XYZ for 100 Qty from SHC?It will be editable in ECC and non editable in SRM,
I can do GR either in ECC or SRM? am i correct?
If i am correct..
If i do GR for a PO-XYZ in ECC,Is this update/follow on document(i.e GR posted for the PO) will be updated in SRM PO-XYZ(available in display mode) follow on document tab/History tab?
Thanks,
San

Similar Messages

  • Doubts in PO's after a Bid invitation in Classic Scenario

    Hello everyone,
    I am working in SRM 5.0 in a classic scenario. I have a doubt, I do de following:
    1. Create a PR in R/3
    2. Replicate the PR in SRM as SC
    3. Create a Bid invitation form the SC
    4. Accept a Bid
    5. Create a PO
    In the 5th step, the PO is created in both system (SRM and R/3). Is this correct?
    I though that only the PO is created in R/3.
    Thanks
    Ivá

    Hi Ivan,
    Pls see this thread which discusses abt the workaorunds for your requirement to create the PO in R/3 backend instead of locally in  SRM.
    Re: Regarding direct material procurement in Classic scenario.
    BR,
    Disha.
    Do reward points for useful answers.

  • Doubts in creation of PO for service PR in classic scenario

    Hi everyone,
    I'm working with SRM 5.5 in a classic scenario.
    I have the following process:
    1. A PR for services is created in ECC (Item Category "D")
    2. The PR is transferred to SRM as SC
    3. A bid invitation is created in sourcing cockpit
    4. A bid is accepted
    5. A PO is created.
    In the 5th step the PO is created locally in SRM. Is this the standard behavior?? Why is not created in R/3?
    Thanks,
    Ivá

    Hi Ivan,
    For scenario details pls refer below links:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/d9/cbd33b8dca2c43e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/e9/d0fc3729b5db48e10000009b38f842/frameset.htm
    What message do you get when you create a PO from Bid?
    Are you able to execute the scenario for materials?
    Regards,
    Prashant

  • Classic scenario-Doubts

    Hi
    I am using IDES(SRM 7.00 withou EHP1) and trying to understand the configuration behind Classic PO.
    I have deactivated extended classic scenario and sourcing is not carried out for Product category.PI is not enabled .
    I think i have done the necessary configuration required for generating Classic PO and the PO also got generated but i am not able to edit the PO in Backend due to which i am assuming that this PO got transferred from the SRM as the backend PO is not a leading PO
    So how can i be sure that the PO which appears in backend is created from  Classic scenario and not extended classic scenario.I am not able to edit this PO in backend as i get the message that " BBP Purchase order cannot be changed".
    Is the value of field STATU in table EKKO different for PO created from Classic/extended classic scenario.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    the easiest way to find out, which follow-on documents have been created is to check the "Related Documents" tab of the Shopping Cart on the UI ("Document Number" and "Backend Document Number") or the Header/Item links with tc. BBP_PD.
    Regards,
    Timea

  • PO not generated at backend in classic scenario

    Hi,
    I am working with SRM 5.0 in classic scenario.
    1) I have defined No. ranges for SC and follow-on documents in SPRO. No. range PO is defined for backend (classic) POs. (Checkbox -External is not marked)
    PO - From 3005000000  to 3008000000
    2) I have assigned this no. range PO to document type 'EC' (Pur Order) as external no. range
    3) No. range PO is also defined at R/3 backend for Purchase Orders (checkbox 'External' not marked)
    PO - From 3004000000 to 3009999999
    4) This no. range is assigned to doc. type EC as Internal no. range in R/3 backend
    Now, when I am creating a SC in SRM and ordering it, it is causing an error in creation.
    I see the following description in Admin login:
    Shopping cart 6500005899 (PO 3005000532): BAPI 001 No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference: 
    PO no. 3005000532 is picked from no. range PO defined in SRM.
    But, in SC screen, I do not see any follow-on documents.
    When I check BBP_PD, I find following data:
    BE_OBJECT_TYPE    ->  BUS2012         -> Follow on Document Object Type in backend system
    BE_OBJECT_ID      -> 3005000535       -> Follow on Document Object ID in backend
    (However, this no. belongs to no. range PO defined in SRM. At the backend, the PO no. range starts from 3004000000 to 3009999999)
    BE_INFO_REC    -> 5300002566
    Also, I can see two lines highlighted in Red under Stats:
                           Status                            Description                 Inactive
    HEADER          I1015                         Awaiting Approval                X
    0000000001      I1111                    Item in Transfer Process           X
    My doubt is that ,
    a) Why system is picking PO# from SRM no. range (3005000535) and showing it as backend object ID?
    b) When system is able to fetch the Info record information from backend, why the PO is not getting generated at the backend?
    Why there is an error in transmission of PO?
    Please help.
    thanks

    plz see Peter instructions in this thread
    SC: Error in transmission BAPI 001
    regards
    Muthu

  • Organization structure in extended classic scenario

    Hi All
    I  am trying to configure extended classic scenario on SAP SRM 7.0.  I have made the following settings for the same:
    1. In SPRO->SRM Server-> Technical Basic Settings -> Define backend system from product category, I have specified target system as SRM system and not ECD system
    2. In SPRO->SRM Server->Cross Application Basic Settings-> Activate Extended Classic Scenario, I have selected all the options including "Back end purchasing group responsible"
    I have a few doubts.
    1. In organization Structure (PPOMA_BBP) Comapny code is corresponding to company code in back end but do I have to create local purchasing organization and local purchasing group i.e. in Functions-> Corresponds  I'll have to leave blank. plz suggest
    2. Also is IPC configuration mandatory for extended classic scenario
    Plz give your suggestion on above mentioned issue
    Regards
    Pawan Keshwani
    Edited by: pawankeshwani on Mar 18, 2011 8:33 AM

    Hi Pawan,
    No you should mention Purch Org & Purch Grp also wrt your backend (ECC).
    IPC need not be configured separately from SRM 5.0 onwards. To ascertain if IPC is working fine just run the report : RSVMCRT_HEALTH_CHECK. You should see 4 success messages. Else get in touch with Basis to enable Virtual Machine Container (VMC)
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • Classic Scenario in SRM 7.0

    Hi,
    I have a doubt. Please correct me if I am wrong:
    -  As per my knowledge, confirmation and invoice can be created either in SRM or ECC in SRM 5.0. However in the SRM 7.0
       confirmation and invoice can not be created in SRM 7.0. It has to be create ECC.
    - In plant drive procurement both confirmation and invoic has to create in ECC. It should not be create in SRM 7.0.
    Thanks in advance.
    BR,
    Jennifer

    Hi Jeniffer,
    In SRM 7.0 also, you can continue to create confirmation and invoice  in classic scenario against your shopping cart.
    Plan driven procurement is not supported for direct materials in classic scenario. You have to use extended classic scenario i.e. in such cases PO, follow-up confirmation and invoicing can be done SRM as well.
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan

  • Procurement Card in SRM 5.0 Classic Scenario

    Dear Gurus,
    We want to configure Procurement Card in SRM 5.0 Classic Scenario. Please help me with the following doubts:
    1. Is it possible to configure P-card in Classic scenario?
    2. If yes, then what are the steps involved to get P-card as payment option in SC and P-card settlement? (backend is ECC6.0)
    3. Are there any enhancements/customizations required to get P-card in Classic scenario?
    Will be grateful for a speedy answer.
    Regards
    Rajeev

    Dear Gurus,
    I am aware that Procurement card can be configued in SRM 5.0 Extended Classic Scenario. Can anyone tell me if it can also be done in Classic scenario?
    Regards
    Rajeev

  • Are you using the Extended Classic Scenario ?

    Hello everybody,
    Is somebody using the Extended Classic Scenario - SRM 4.0 ?
    If yes, could you describe briefly the config steps that you follow ?    
    I have received and followed some advices here and I have checked all the official documents without success..   =(     Until now, for some reason the EBP tries to create the PO in the backend =(
    Thanks for your help guys !
    Regards from Mexico.
    Diego

    Hi Diego,
    If you activated the Extended scenario, the system cannot try to create directly a PO in the backend, it first has to create it localy.
    If you are sure that:
    -You activated the Extended scenario in SPRO (and not in the BADI)
    -The system tries to create directly the PO in R/3 (as you say in your post)
    Then there are only 2 solutions:
    1- You have activated the scenario BADI, and tell the system to work in classic scenario
    2- You have a bug in your SRM (which I doubt, cause I implemented this scenario on EBP 3.5, EBP 4.0 and SRM Server 5.0, and I never had this kind of problem).
    Regards.
    Vadim

  • Replication of PO in Classic Scenario

    hi,
    in classic scenario, when we create a SC it is creating a PR in backend system.with reference to that PR i am creating a PO in backend system.but the same PO number(copy) has been replicated to EBP system.on what basis it is replicated.
    is there any program that needs to be scheduled in backend system?
    kindly calrify my doubt.
    regards
    subhash

    dear Muthu,
    i have created a SC in EBP where it created PR in backend and w.r.t PR i have created a PO.
    now i need to do confirmation of SC in EBP.if i complete my confirmation in EBP material document will be created in backendsystem also.
    My doubt is how we are able to do confirmation in EBP for that particular SC w.r.t what?
    please calrify this
    regards
    subhash

  • Self service procurement and plan driven procurement in classic scenario

    hai friends,
    i have configured self service procurement and now i am configuring plan driven procurement in classic scenario.my doubt is suppose  a shopping cart is created and placed in a sourcing application of the professional buyer.And assume he accomplished sourcing activity and created purchase order .Now purchase order is created locally or in the backed.i am using classic scenario ,now can u tell where the purchase order is located? if i want to place that particular purchase order in SRM  it self what will i do? thanks in advance.

    Hi Chandra
    before going to select Business scenario (self service, plan driven..etc), you must freeze the technical scenario. Depends upon your technical scenario, your PO will be created .
    Where PO is created it is called leading system. It is SAP standard.
    If you were selected  Classic- Po created in R/3.- R/3 is a leading system .
    if you were select ECS- > PO will created in SRM and Copy also will be created in R/3 system. In EBP only you can edit the PO not in r/3. here SRM is a Leading system.
    regards
    Muthu

  • Extended Classic Scenarios Basic Queries

    Dear SRM Experts,
    I am working in the demo of extended classic scenario in SRM 7.0. I have some basic questions on it, Kindly reply for my doubts :
    1. Do SRM-SUS Scenario applicable for all three procurements
         a. Self-Service Procurement
         b. Plan Driven Procurement
         c. Service Procurement.
    or applicatbility only for Service Procurement .
    2. Is it necessary to implement MM-SUS (Classic Scenario) first before implement of SRM-SUS? (Setting UP IDocs etc)
    while i will only use XML Communication in XI(will select the Service_Procurement_Supplier_Enablement configuration scenario)
    3. Is the configuration for Distribution Model and Partner Profiles necessary between SRM and SUS Communication in extended classic scenario?
    Thanks.
    Regards
    Pawan

    Hi Pawan,
    Pl go through the following links for better understanding
    difference between MM-SUS and SRM-SUS
    SRM 7.0 SUS with ECS
    Supplier Self Service (SRM-SUS)
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • Partial quantity of Material in Extended and Classic Scenarios

    Does it possible to pass partial quantity of Material into Extended and Classic Scenario ;for instance we have 100 qty  for a material & out of them 60 qty goes to Extended PO and 40 qty goes to Classic in backend system .
    If yes so how & what criteria would be ?

    Hi Lalit,
    Until now we did not use both classic and extended classic for one organization.
    Are you using that or you just have a doubt??
    Regards,
    Satish

  • Creation of Inbound delivery mandatory for ASN process in classic scenario?

    Dear Experts,
    We are going for classic scenario for our green field SRM implementation process. Our client is not using  ASN process in their existing MM process. However, they are now looking for an oppurtunity to enable Suppliers to trigger ASN using SUS. In such case, is creation of inbound delivery from Buyer side a mandatory process?
    Is the below the process correct?
    PO -> ASN (Supplier using SUS) -> Inbound delivery (Optional) -> Goods Receipt (Mandatory) -> Invoicing.
    Here, I understand that Goods receipt can be verified against the PO or via Inbound delivery to PO. ASN will inform the store keeper in advance about impending goods receipt and smoothen the confirmation process.
    Could you please comment on the above process? Could you please suggest the best practices followed here?
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan
    Ranjan Sutradhar

    Hey Ranjan!,
    You are on track.
    The process flow you have shown is true. ASN is available as a standard as part of the MM-SUS process. It makes the buyer aware of any delays in delivery or to make arrangements on shipping docks to receive goods on a said date etc.
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • POR transferred into MM(Backend) system in Extended Classic Scenario

    I am working on standard EBP-SUS Extended Classic Scenario. We have SRM Server 7.0 SP9 
    As we are successfully send PO from EBP to SUS.
    Issue : On working to Purchase Order Response,i am getting POR sent by SUS to EBP but we are not getting it replicated to MM.
    Our Concerns about is it need extra configuration required or need to have apply some note to getting replicated POR in MM from EBP or have to configure some XI Scenario to replicate POR from SRM EBP to MM.
    As we know that Extended Classic Scenario supports till Purchase Order Response still we are not getting Purchase Order Response in MM.
    Please tell us, Provided Solution will  be really appreaciated.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Pawan Keshwani

    hi,
    Pls see the foll notes:
    Note 576349 - Terms of payment in the ECS
    Note 541934 - Modification note: Copying base date from T052
    Note 953999 - ECS: Terms of Payment values not in PO header
    <b>Note 940453 - Backend payment term data not updated in the extended PO
    Note 945018 - Incoterms data not transferred to the back end</b>
    BR,
    Disha.
    Pls reward points for useful answers.

Maybe you are looking for