Down payemt restriction for some vendors

The issue is like this
Down payment to some vendors to be restricted but not through the separate vendor account group because after some point of time my client may allow them (vendor) for down payment.
Thanks in Advance

1. Use of field in Master Data.
Decide wich field to use. For example Payment method.
in Ob28 mantain validation
Prereq. BKPF-BSTAT <> 'S'
Check ZWELS= '1'
Message Error
So, for vendor wich allowd to create DPR you'd mantain Payment method=1...
2. in Ob28 mantain validation
Check : here you'd ask abaper to write code,wich'd check Z table,where you mantain list of vendor(for wich DPR isn't allowded)
As for me, 1 varint is more useful!

Similar Messages

Clearing cross-profit-center to be restricted for some vendors

Dear All,
For some vendors we want only clearing on the same Profit Center to be allowed.
Can you please tell me if it's possible and how?
Many thanks in advance.
Adela

Ok, now I understand your requirement. What I know is that this requires an extensive user exit to be used within FI Validations. The validation should be at the line item level since we are dealing with fields from BSEG. This will need at least 2 validation steps. The first one will have pre-requisites like, the posting key, t-code (F-44) and account type K, for example. Then the user exist will read and export the profit center from the line item, say the invoice with profit center 111. Then the second validation step will have similar pre-requisites and import the profit center from the memory variable from previous step.
This user exit in the second step will compare the profit center from the line item profit center and then will issue an error message if the values are not the same.
You need an ABAP programmer to work with you. The user exit code would need to be inserted into a sub routine pool especially assigned to FI validations.
Sharabh

FBL1N - Limit display line itens for some vendors

Hi All,
I have a request from business to limit the access for some vendors in FBL1N.
The idea is to limit the users to do not see the line itens for some vendors.
Is there some standard configuration? Any suggestion?

Ricardo,
My suggestion is to involve a Basis person for this. You need to check the authorization object attached to Vendor line item display transaction FBL1N.
Then explain to the Basis person the conditions in which certain line items should not be displayed. I am sure this exercise would be of help.
Regards,
Vishal.

I am using OS 10.8.5 on a MacBook Pro, what version of Widows 8 should I purchase so I have an IE browser for some vendors I need to communicate who only have IE browser support?

I am using OS 10.8.5 on a MacBook Pro, what version of Widows 8 should I purchase so I have an IE browser for some vendors I need to communicate who only have IE browser support?

but if all you need is to use internet explore and not play 3d games then
using bootcamp is overkill and overcomplex
use a free virtual machine such as virtualbox https://www.virtualbox.org/
and you'll have IE comming out of your ears in no time

Setup of Inspection Lots for some vendors and not for all

Hello,
We do have a situation where in the business wants Inspection Lots to be set up for some vendors and not for some vendors - for the same material.
What it means is, for Material XXXXX001, Vendor 00003 needs inspection during GR for Purchase Order and Vendor 00005 and 00006 should be set up for Non Inspection upon GR and stocks should be posted to Unrestricted.
Any suggestions / options are welcome.
Thanks
Kris

Hello,
You can use vendor q-info records to handle this... deactivate the goods receipt inspection on the vendor(s) that do not require incoming inspection.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/c6/b9b3341a933f50e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
Regards,
John

Excluding PO printing for some vendors.

Hi Guys,
I have a requirement as below with respect to PO printing.
I have 10 vendors for which client doesn't want to print the PO for others they want to print the PO.
Currently we are maintained the condition records with respect to document type.
We have two access sequence for condition records (MN04).
1. Purchase Org/ Vendor
2. Purchase Org/ Document Type.
We have a customized print program. In this print program the system takes the printer details from the user master.
For the limited 10 vendors the client want the output type, that is the system should trigger message type. when they process those purchase orders, the message status should change to printed, but the print out should not come from the printer for those 10 vendors. As the printer details the system picks from the user master so I am not able to restrict the system from printing the purchase orders created for those excluded vendors.
Please guide me some solution for this.
Regards,
Manju.

Untick print immediately option from comm. data for these vendors.
Regards,
Dakshesh

1920 down to 720 for some lateral

Hi All,
Question about my avchd 1920x1080 and reducing my sequence to 720 giving me some lateral for cropping unwanted areas, so I do not have to use zoom to blow up pixels. I have seen this done with FCP however I cannot see my results after creating a 720 sequence while using 1920 sized footage. I want big footage for a smaller box to be able to crop out edges without using Scale to 150%
See pics if you are not clear on my question please. If it is easy to do please write>out>the>path to turn it on or access it if available. Not just one word like see "Kanuder Valve" Thank you.
NC

What you have circled in your first image is your Preview File format.
Changing that will not change your Sequence settings.
As Jim sez, you need to create a new 720 Sequence.
Not changable after footage is in a timeline?
Not changeable after creating it, footage or not.

Authorization for limited vendor for user in FBL1n

Hi,
I have certain user in my company, to whom, i want to give t-code FBL1N access. But for some vendors only.
Please let me know, how it can be done.

Hi Durga
As far as I see I can suggest you 2 options:
1. You can create a validation with sets for users and vendors. This way you can restrict to only the t-codes you want the restriction to apply
2. You can co-ordinate with BASIS to restrict using authorization object F_BKPF_BEK. You have to assign authorization group to vendors and give authorization to users for specific authorization groups. In this case, you cannot restrict only to FBL1N. The restriction would be applicable to all the transaction codes for the users where vendors are impacted.
Regards
Sowmya

Error when upgrading to 10.5 on Windows7. Message is HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE32\Software\Classes\.m4b\OpenWithList\itunes.exe. Verify that you have sufficent access to that key. I am an administrator but cannot get to that key for some reason.

I tried creating a new user account and installing and it would not work either. I tried the uninstall recommendation from Apple and that did not work. I am running out of ideas. I even had my IT look at it and they said Apple sometimes locks down their registries for some reason.

This isn't really my thing but no one else has replied.
A few thoughts, if this is an upgrade, are you using the same account to do the upgrade as you used for the original install? If now it might be worth trying the other account.
Although you account has admin status, it might be worth logging in as THE adminstrator, if you haven't done that.
Although you don't have HKEYLOCALMACHINE\Software\.aif\OpenWithProgIds, you didn't say if you have HKEYLOCALMACHINE\Software\.aif - if you do it might be worth checking permission there.
If this is an iTunes 7.5 upgrade problem - you didn't say - it might be worth gettting the details to royb - see this post:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5766448&#5766448

PO issued for one vendor and GRPO another for the same

Hai members,
                  I have a problem, is it possible , to select a different vendor for the PO reaised for different vendor,
i.e.,
Po raised for 20 items against the Vendor   XYZ
But goods received
XYZ-   10
ABC-   10

Suda,
           At us the criteria is
One Vendor may have several companies
Once we produce order to him , he will dispatch the goods from either of the companies he had or from the both
but the PO purchase order comes from only in one name of the vendor
Suppose i had produced
100 Pcs order for Some Vendor -
   XYZ
But he may dispatch the same goods that we have ordered
from either of the comapnies he had i.e., XYZ, 123, ABC
but the PO is same
I think you got it Suda, please help me........ Thanks in advance

How to restrict access to views for some users in the app?

Hi SDN!
I have an WD application wich embedded in the portal. Appication has 2 iViews (and 2 pages respectively). These iViews consist several views connected with each other (e.g. one view provide list data, second view is add/edit form for this data). I need to restrict access for some users for view with add/edit form. I can't make separate page for this view.
What I've done:
1) create yet another UIContainer for this view in main window and embed view to this container. It was be done for create separate iView for form.
2) in the portal I create iView for this form but don't embedd in any page.
When I try to call my form from list data (that is one iView from another) I get exception:
<b>com.sap.tc.webdynpro.services.exceptions.WDRuntimeException: duplicate usage of view .MyCarRentalAddCity</b>
Is there a way to get needed functional?
Thanks,
Lev

Hi,
do you need to remove the IView from the portal menu or do you just want to make a View container in your WD application invisible if the user doesn't have the rights to see it.
If so, you could create your own roles on the app server:
You need to create a new class that extends NamePermission like:
import com.sap.security.api.permissions.NamePermission;
public class ApplicationAccessPermission extends NamePermission {
           * @param name
          public ApplicationAccessPermission(String name) {
               super(name);
           * @param name
           * @param action
          public ApplicationAccessPermission(String name, String action) {
               super(name, action);
Also, you have to create an Action.XML file that looks like this:
<BUSINESSSERVICE
     NAME="com.vendor.administration">
     <DESCRIPTION
          LOCALE="en"
          VALUE="actions view usage"/>
     <ACTION
          NAME="View Permission">
          <DESCRIPTION
               LOCALE="en"
               VALUE="Show view"
               />
          <PERMISSION
               CLASS="com.vendor.utilities.ApplicationAccessPermission"
               NAME="ShowView"
               />
     </ACTION>
</BUSINESSSERVICE>
If you have created these to files in your packages, you can access this function like:
IUser user ;
try {
          user = WDClientUser.getCurrentUser().getSAPUser();
          if(user.hasPermission(new ApplicationAccessPermission("Show view"))){
               wdContext.currentV_UIElement().setViewVisibility(WDVisibility.VISIBLE);
          }else{
               wdContext.currentV_UIElement().setViewVisibility(WDVisibility.NONE);
     }catch (WDUMException e1) {
          wdContext.currentV_UIElement().setViewVisibility(WDVisibility.NONE);
                e1.printStacktrace();
You have to bind the ViewVisibility attribute of the context to the View Container you want to hide.
The applicationAccessPermission you defined in the XML File will be visible in the UME Manager of you J2EE engine. With this action you can create a new role and group that you can map to the users that should see you view.
But, the exception you get is because you have embedded one view twice, which is not possible.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Dennis

The problems seems that the free trial what i am constantly paying for may have ran out/free trial time never contacted as i find this online to take to long and to hard to deal with yet a paying costumer restricted by some weird fault i don't get this t

the problems seems that the free trial what i am constantly paying for may have ran out/free trial time never contacted as i find this online to take to long and to hard to deal with yet a paying costumer restricted by some weird fault i don't get this tried every thing how can i be billed and money taken for hired subscription but end up with a "free trial" that cut me off having withdrawal as i live my life inside Photoshop

Use the trackpad to scroll, thats what it was designed for. The scroll bars automatically disappear when not being used and will appear if you scroll up or down using the trackpad.
This is a user-to-user forum and most people will post on here if they have problems. You very rarely get people posting to say there update went smooth. The fact is the vast majority of Mountain Lion users will not be experiencing any major problems with the OS, or maybe with apps which are not compatible, but thats hardly Apple's fault if developers don't update their apps.

Restrict the posting period opening and closing for some users

Dear SAP gurus,
I want to restrict some users to open the posting period and for some users close posting periods. I knew that these can be done through authorization group. Pls explain how to create authorization groups and how to use those? Anybody can help me out?
Regards,
Venkata Reddy

Dear Venkatareddy,
There are two sets of period in OB52. The first set of "From" and "To" is for the authorised group and second set is for the non authorised group. In the "Authorisation Group" (last column) give some 4 charecters name. Say "FICO".
Now ask the basis to attach the object "FICO" for the users who are authorised say user1, user 2 and user3.
Now in the first set of period you can maintain say 1 2008 to 16 2008 and in the second set 1 2008 to 1 2008.
So except user1,2 and 3, all the others can post only in 1 2008. Whereas users 1,2 and3 can post in all the periods of 2008.
Assign points if useful
regards
Venkatesh

I want to reset my ipod touch 4th gen but i have forgotten the restrictions passcode and for some reason its not working on my laptop on itunes and the restore thing wont work! any help?

I want to reset my ipod touch 4th gen but i have forgotten the restrictions passcode and for some reason its not working on my laptop on itunes and the restore thing wont work! any help?

Make sure you have the Current Version of iTunes Installed on your computer
iTunes free download from www.itunes.com/download
Then See Here > http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1808
You may need to try this More than Once... Be sure to Follow ALL the Steps...
Take your time... Pay particular attention to Steps 3 and 4.
After you have Recovered your Device...Re-Sync your Content
Note:
To remove a forgotten Restrictions passcode you will need to Restore the Device as New...
OR... From a Backup created Before the Restrictions Code was set....

How to restrict the access of "InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx" and "InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx" pages for some users and allow the access for some users?

I have a requirement to restrict the access of "InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx" and "InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx" pages for some of the users and allow the access for some of the users.
I have applied the below code on the web.config file but this modification impacting only on the web application level not on the site collection and sub site level.
<location path="_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx">
    <system.web>
      <authorization>
        <deny users="*" />
      </authorization>
    </system.web>
</location>
<location path="_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx">
    <system.web>
      <authorization>
        <deny users="*" />
      </authorization>
    </system.web>
</location>
When I tried the access on
:<portno>/sites/<scname>/_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx">http://<servername>:<portno>/sites/<scname>/_layouts/15/InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx page allowed the access for all users.
Please suggest the possible solution to restrict the access of "InPlaceRecordsListSettings.aspx" and "InPlaceRecordsSettings.aspx" pages on SharePoint2013.
Thanks
Ramasubbu

You can't do it from OOTB.
_layout folder is accessible to the users if they have read access in any of the site even subsite.
You can modify *.aspx file, add your custom control which will check user.
[custom.development]

Down payemt restriction for some vendors

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for