Downward and Upward integration scenarios

Hi,
Can anybody explain some upward and downward scenarios from scratch how to approach.
Like i am looking at these
Downward ( ERP to SFA systems ) :planned Orders,Bills of Material
Upward (from SFA Systems to SAP ERP )
- Upload Inspection results recording
Please explain how idocs,bapi(standard) ,bls are used to integrate.
Thanks,
Vansi

That's a consulting question...we charge to answer these

Similar Messages

ALE/IDOC and RFC/BAPI Integration Scenarios with SAP DS for ESA v3

Hi,
we are planning two PoCs of Integration Plattforms. One of our major requirement set is SAP Integration into our existing SOA.
Because we also have R/3 4.7 Systems in production, we are planning to test ALE/IDOC and RFC/BAPI Integration scenarios with these Integration Plattforms.
My question is:
We are looking for are smart solution to get a SAP Test Environment, where we can test ALE/IDOC und RFC/BAPI Integration scenarios.
It is possible to do this with SAP DS for ESA v3 or shall we better use IDES for that purpose?
Best regards,
Steven

Hi Abhishek,
This is our scenario. We are doing an integration of SAP HR r/3 system with the CRM system. We need housing information details of the employees which we have in custom infotype 9310 in SAP HR system and we need those details in the CRM system. So am planning out for an ALE/IDOC approach for the integration and gonna maintain the 9310 details in a custom table. In the CRM system, we gonna build a BOL layer for accessing the 9310 details. Also i'm preparing a HLD for this process. I wanna read and go through few same HLD's before i submit my proposal to my client. Please suggest me and help me out.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Arunmozhi.

Integration scenario for Centralized Emergency Access and Helpdesk / CHARM

Hi,
Is any of you aware of a scenario doc between GRC and SOLMAN? Since Change Requests are referred in GRC, I assume there is an integrated scenario...
Thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Ádá

Can Firefighter logon using the Netweaver Business Client to launch Firefighter ID?
- No, GRAC_SPM is the way to go.
Is that mandate to use GRC system to launch Firefighter ID using GRAC_SPM transaction code? or can the user logon to local system as well?
- Yes. However, the option would be nice to have a workaround in case GRC is down
What about Portal based system Firefighting functionality? Can we have Firefighter IDs on Netweaver Java system?
- As far as I know only for transactional SAP systems.
Will I be able to grant a Firefighter ID to a Firefighter User on hourly basis?
- Same as answered already - no.
For initial setup , how the initial data load of Firefighter Ids Owners, Controllers and Firefighter Users can be done? Are there options like load from Excel or CSV available as part of setup toolset?
- Same as answered already - no.

Integration scenario and configuration scenario - is it madatory

Hi,
Integration Scenarios are not mandatory, the reason for creating them is given in the blog you mentioned:
The advantages of defining integration scenarios in the Integration Builder (design tool) are as follows:
· The integration scenario provides you with an overview of the process and the process flow
· The integration scenario club together all objects like SWVC,Interface objects, mapping objects,integration processes.You can access all of these objects from the integration scenario.
· The integration scenario gives you the design time information which is required for its configuration.
The configurtation items are getting created.
Regards
Patrick

Hi Priya,
There are two things here.
1) Create the Integration Scenario in the IR.
2) Use the wizard to configure the integration scenario in ID.
The Integration scenario created in the IR acts as a template to create the configuration objects in ID.
The wizard will create the actual configuration objects only (not just documentation).
But creating integration scenarios is not mandatory.
YOu can as well create all the configuration objects manually.
Generally, you will go for Integration scenarios if you are building a general purpose product (Product based ).
If it is a project that you are building for a particular customer, you can chose to create the configuration objects using the configuration scenario approach.
Regards,
Ravi kanth talagana

Mix B2B and A2A in integration scenario

Hello XI experts,
I'm trying to build an integration scenario in the repository that I want to import later on into the directory for automatic configuration.
The scenario is HTTP -> XI -> RFC. On the sender side I would like to use a business service, so I selected 'External party with B2B communication' for the sending application component. On the receiver side I would like to use a SAP business system, so I didn't select that option there.
Now, if I import into the directory, this doesn't work as expected. I can select my business service for the sender side, this works. However, for the receiver side I always have to specify a virtual receiver service and my receiver determination and interface determination are created with a virtual receiver service in it.
Is there any way to avoid the virtual receiver? Any help is appreciated!
Best regards,
Matthias

Hello Aamir,
you are right, I don't need virtual receivers for my scenaro and I also don't want to use them.
However, when modelling my scenario with an integration scenario in the design, I'm forced to do this and I would like to know whether there is any way to avoid this.
In order to be able to use a business service on the sender side, it seems I have to select the checkbox 'External party with B2B communication' in my integration scenario. When importing & configuring the scenario in the directory, I am then able to select by business service for the sender side. However, for the receiver side I have to specify a virtual receiver, otherwise I cannot finish the config wizard.
Any more ideas?
Best regards,
Matthias

Regarding Integration Scenario and Communication Channel Template

Dear All,
1.What is the purpose of creating Integration Scenario in IR?Is it compulsary to create Integration Scenario in Every Case?(I mean Scenario not using BPM and Scenario using BPM).
2.What is the purpose of creating Communication Channel Template in IR?
3.If we create Communication Channel Template in IR?Do we need to utilize that Communication Channel Template for creating Communication Channel in ID?
4.IF we have created Integration Scenario in IR,and we transfered that Scenario from IR to ID,then Do we need to create Sender Agreement,Receiver Agreement,Receiver Determination,Interface Determination?or will they automatically created?
Please clarify my doubts.Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Ramana.

Hi Ramana,
1.What is the purpose of creating Integration Scenario in IR?Is it compulsary to create Integration Scenario in Every Case?(I mean Scenario not using BPM and Scenario using BPM).
>>> For graphical overview about the sceanrio.It is not compulsary to create Integration Sceanrio.
2.What is the purpose of creating Communication Channel Template in IR?
>>> In integration scenario while creating the connection between two actions u need to specify the communication channel templates for Sender and Receiver.
3.If we create Communication Channel Template in IR?Do we need to utilize that Communication Channel Template for creating Communication Channel in ID?
>>>You can utilize these templates in ID.After completion to creating the configuration sceanrio need to modify the parameters of the channels.
4.IF we have created Integration Scenario in IR,and we transfered that Scenario from IR to ID,then Do we need to create Sender Agreement,Receiver Agreement,Receiver Determination,Interface Determination?or will they automatically created?
>>> From Tools-->Transfer Integration sceanrio from Integration Repository, From input help choose the sceanrio,Continue and click on Finish ,with the same name the configuration scenaro will create in ID.You need to follow the Confiuration steps like Assign services , here need to choose u r source & target business systems and Configure Connections in this step you can cross check the interfaces,mapping,channel templates involved in this sceanrio and Generate. It would automatically generates Sender Agreement,Receiver Agreement,Receiver Determination,Interface Determination. It would shown to u Generation Log, here you can check what are the objects generated and if there are any errors it would shown Number of errors.
By setting the appropriate channel parameters, activate all objects from change list.Now u can able to test the sceanrio.
However in latest version it is not compulsoary to create Integration sceanrio in IR and to the above things.You can use Configuration Wizard to do all these things or you can do these mauvally.
Hope it will helps to clear u r doubts.
Cheers
Veera
>>>Reward points,if it is needful.

Integration Scenario Configuator and Business Services (B2B)

We use Business Services to define the services provided by our external business partners (e.g. a transport organization has defined some webservices to which we connect to).
The reason why we use Business Services is that we don't have to define them in the SLD. And we understand from the documentation that external business systems should be defined as Business Services and not Business Systems.
Now we want to use the Integration Scenario Configurator, but when we define a B2B service in the Integation Scenario, we cannot create the communication channels with the wizard. Futhermore the other object (receiver determination etc.) is also not created for the business service.
When we take a look at the definition of a B2B scenario in the SAP documentation, the documentation describes a complete different use of B2B. We understand from the documentation that B2B is a cross company XI landscape where all partners have there own XI system. This also explains the behavure in the configurator since one party cannot access its own business systems.
This leaves us with the following questions:
1. Is B2B only possible for XI to XI scenario's?
2. Is a service provided by a partner a business system?
3. And do we have to include all communication end point in the SLD?
Kind regards,
Christiaan Schaake

Dear Christiaan,
I encountered the same problem. What I did was that I created a party for the external business partner and assigned a business service to it. Beside this you have to check the box (ext. party w. B2B comm) under communication type in the application component in the integration scenario.
When you have done this you can create comm. channel with the wizard and also the other objects.
see: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/e6/908d3f7057eb0ce10000000a114084/content.htm
Regarding your questions: depending on the way we think, we can come up with different answers. I don't think this is what you're looking for.
Maybe someone else can give you a clear answer.
Kind Regards
Ron van Steen

One integration scenario Many target system and Outgoing compressed data

I have some theoretical questions about XI usage.
At first, I'm not quite sure about the following thing: for example we have a corporate system and a lot of mobile computers (let's name them "clients") with installed small databases. Number of clients is not constant, but integration scenario is one for all of them. Next, if we add new client we must add new technical system, business system, communication channel, configure scenario, add required receiver and interface determination, and so on and so on. If we remove client we also must do all these steps. In this case, is it possible in XI (anywhere) to automate these procedures of scenario configuration? For example create something like business system template with communication channels or have one business system and a lot of communication channels in one integration scenario (in this way I suppose that message will be delivered to target system on the message content-based routing) and quickly activate/deactivate this channels (in fact receiver determination).
At second, we know that XI can receive and send compressed data if client initiates communication with XI. Anybody know about reverse functionality, when XI initiates communication with target system and compresses data (on the understanding that target system is able to receive and handle compressed data). If anybody know that is possible - can you navigate me to this information?
Thank you for help,
Best regards.

Hi Maxim,
You dont need to create techn and bus systems in SLD for your clients as you can use business services. Of course you have to create a comm channel for every client (receiver address is individual!). Receiver determination and interface determination can be configured dynmamicly with wild cards (*). You can find receivers by condition of payload content.
If you want to change this conditions very quickly (with a customizing table) you can use following trick: Use a ABAP mapping which is reading that table. Unfortunately the message is first routed and then mapped. So you have to send the message over http adapter back to XI, where the changed message is now routed by a condition. Of course a quite complex scenario, the monitoring is even more complex bcoz doubled no of messages (no performance problem - http adapter is never a bottleneck).
Regards,
Udo

Documentation on Integration Scenarios for BAS-PV and DES

Hi,
Is there any documentation on the Integration Scenarios for BAS Postal Validation, and Duplicate-Check and Error-Tolerant Search for ECC 5.0?
What we have is only for R3 4.6, and the behavior of business partners for ECC 5.0 is very much different as compared to R3 4.6.
Thanks!

The newest release of the sharepoint kit called internally (ipoint) should work fine with java infoview. I haven't set this up my self and you may need to open an incident with support to verify if Edge supports the newest sharepoint kit.
Regards,
Tim

Integration Scenario OR Collobration profiles and Aggrements

Hi all,
         Is the process creation of Communication Channels, Actions and Integration Scenario in IR and then Importing these Comm Channels and Integration Scenario in to ID is the best way
                          OR
         In ID Manually create Comm Channel and creation of Collaboration profile and collaboration aggrements is the best way
Which do i need to follow for doing my Scenario.
Regards,
Vijaya Lakshmi

Hi Vijaya Lakshmi,
Although using the wizard is so-considered to be one of the best practices, theres no hard and fast rule. Both will take the same amount of time and knowledge. You can use the one you are most comfortable with.
Doing it yourself without taking aid of a wizard doesn't require very profound skills as such. However, creating scenario using Actions, swim lanes in IR does help in documenting and keeping track of complex processes.
Regards,
Riyaz

Integration Scenario with Oracle SOA Suite and SAP

Hi to all
I have the following integration scenario:
The customer have some applications in the integration landscape. All of this applications are integrated with Oracle Soa Suite.
This customer, want to buy SAP ERP (ECC 6.0), and they want to integrate SAP ECC in their infrastructure.
I told to them, that is necesary have Process Integration (PI), by have a services oriented architecture.
But, I want to hear options, possibilities and comments. Where I find information related ?
Thank you very much
Dario

Hi Rodriguez ,
you can use Oracle AS Adapter for SAP for integrating SAP system to oracle .
some step you need to do in SAP ECC side for data transfer - like create TCP/IP RFC connection ,
for TCP/IP RFC config. you can generate program ID in Oracle AS Adapter ..Also Oracle provides a SAP JRFC library for integrating SAP system .
you can find more information in given link -
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/integration/adapters/dev_support.html
Regards,
Amit Shivhare

Difference between Process integration scenario and configuration scenario.

Hi,
Please tell me what is difference between Process integration scenarion and configuration scenarion in SAP PI.
Is Process integration scenario is BPM concept? also what is the advantages over configuration scenario.
Regards,
Manigandan

Hi Manigandan,
Speaking widely:
Process integration scenario: there is a ccBPM, like the workflow in ABAP, even when you one inside the PI it's generated a workflow in the ABAP stuck
Configuration scenario: it is object to link the integration directory and the esr/IR when you define the logic of your implementation. It isnt mandatory, but you can organize better you develoments if you make an scenario for a "real scenario" like a file to soap integration, you can define it like a configuration scenario.
Regards.

Unable to Load the Integration scenario into the Integration directory

Hi All,
I am new to using SAP XI.
Require your help on the following issue.
I have built an Integration scenario, added Component Type: Product Version, inserted actions and connections.
I did check for any errors. I found no errors.
When I am trying to load this scenario into the Integration directory its not showing up the scenario in the popup.
Navigation:
Directory > tools> Transfer scenario from repository
The status of Integration Scenario in the builder shows as
"Being processed".
I created the scenario 2 days back.
Can some one help me in this?
Regards,
Meher

Hi All,
Thanks to all who helped me.
michal,divija : Can you please let me know in details how to activate Business Scenario?
I did not create any business process.
Sridhar: I did releases some locks on my process, no luck.
Can you please explain me in more details?
Should I have a process build for my Integration scenario to be activated?
Thanks,
Meher

PS and PP integration

Dear Experts,
Good Morning....
Please suggest me PS and PP integration customization steps.
Regards
Lallan

PP is not a major player in PS as far as integration is concerned. It is through Material Management that Production Planning is informed of Production Orders using special settings in the Material Master.
One another area, the PP and PM modules share Work Centers with Project System.
The Work Center is needed for Capacity Planning and Planning costs. If we integrate this Work Center with HR module, we will be able to select only the people who have been assigned to the Work Center. We can specify the amount of work the individual will contribute. This forms the basis for capacity planning.
Hope u must have understand.
PS - Process
After creating the project next step is u want to do cost, Revenue & Budget Planning for the project
in the t-codes CJ42, CJ30 & CJ40 respectively. Next step is creating the Sale order in va01 T-code.
But I have internal project scenario, example: Overhauling of DG set. Assigned work enter & Workforce & also material to network. So shall I do costing? As explained! Is it necessary to create of Sales Order?
CMP2 - Assign workforce to activities
CAT2 - Transfer actual time to CATS. In CAT2 we have record the actual timing correct for an activity, on day basis & with personal number.
MD51 - Run Project MRP to create Planned orders.
MD04, ME21N, MIGO - Convert planned orders to purchase requisitions and P.O, and goods receipt.
MB1A - once the goods are brought is project stock; the same needs to be consumed by mb1a -281 Q on the project.
CJ20n - Attach milestones as per the payment terms.
VA02 - Copy billing plan to sales order.
VF01 - Billing
CJ20n - Project tech complete and closure.
Hope this will help you,
Regards,
ANSAR

The userexit is not working in integration scenario- inb. delivery creation

Hi Experts please help,
We know that vl31n is for inbound delivery creation.
in one of the userexits of vl31n, I did code ( shifting the batch to vendor batch )...
So,the user enters batch number under batch field and
fill all other required information and saves to create inbound delivery.
Whilw inbound delivery creation my coding in user exit gets executed and shifts the batch number to Vendor batch field.
This we observed when we check in vl32n or vl33n, the batch entered shifted to Vendor batch field() batch field is space.
This is working fine with vl31n inb. delivery creation.
But in integration testing it failed.
In Integration, what is happening the other system called "ICH" is creating ASN (shipping note) with the batch number, which inturn created the inbound delivery in R/3 via XI as shown like below.
Integration scenario :
ICH System (ASN) --> XI --> R/3 System (Inb. delivery creation)
So when "ICH" triggers ASN to R/3 the inbound delivery creation is happening but the batch number is not shifting to vendor batch field.
when we open the inbound delivery in vl32n, the batch number is under batch field only...it should be under vendor batch field.
My understanding is my user exit coding of vl31n not getting executed in the integration process.
Kindly help me what can I do to shift the batch sending from ICH to shift to vendor batch field.
Please let me know if I could not explain the scenario.
THANKS IN advance.
YOUR HELP WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED.

the ASN from ICH, it uses a standard idoc function module IDOC_INPUT_DESADV1 and there is one user exit EXIT_SAPLV55K_012 which calls ZXTRKU07
need to code there.
solved by meetings with some other experts.
THANKS.

Downward and Upward integration scenarios

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for