DPR 633/1972 - Split Payment

Hello everyone,
following approval of the DPR 633/1972 starting from January 1st 2015 became operational the spli payment mechanism towards public sector.
I submit the issue to the Community in order to understand if and how the issue has been addressed or if there is a note by SAP that explains how to fix it.
I thank you all
Vincenzo Pisculli - Head of ICT Engineering & Demand Management c/o Metroweb SPA

Similar Messages

Getting split payment terms in case of customer credit memo(Doc type DG)

Hi Guys,
Is there any FM available for getting split payment terms in case of customer credit memo(Document type DG). There will be no invoice/billing doc for this document type and will be created from FB75 transaction. For billing document i am using FM SD_PRINT_TERMS_OF_PAYMENT_SPLI. Please let me know if there is any FM for accounting document also.
Thanks,
Vinod.

Hi,
Try this bapi
BAPI_AR_ACC_GETSTATEMENT

Split payment document by cleared document

Split payment document by cleared document
hello, do you know if it s possible the following requirement:
when posting a manual payment (F-53) my client would like to have bank line item splited by cleared document (invoice). Usually, you can clear several invoices with one payment (bank line item ) but my client wants to have the bank line item splited in several line items by the corresponding invoice cleared
example
now (allways)
40 vendor's invoice 1 100
40 vendor's invoice 2 200
40 vendor's invoice 3 300
50 bank                    600
future
40 vendor's invoice 1 100
40 vendor's invoice 2 200
40 vendor's invoice 3 300
50 bank 1                  100
50 bank 2                  200
50 bank 3                  300
I think that is not possible by the way...
cheers!

Hello
I have defined the Splitting method as following:
Z000000001 Splitting:
Business transaction           1000       Payments
Transaction variant            0001       Standard
Item category                  01000      Balance Sheet Account
As I want to split bank account in manual payments I set Business Transaction as Payments, Transaction Variant as 0001...
Do you know how I can define that splitting of bank account in payments will be done based in invoice number?
The payment for the above vendor invoice then contains the following
items when entered:
PK         Account               Amount
50          Bank                    -100
25          Payables               100 (clearing 2 invoices 50 each)
Document splitting then creates the following document in the General
Ledger view:
PK        Account     Split (invoice) Amount
50          Bank            INV1          -50
50          Bank            INV2          -50
25          Payables      INV1          50
25          Payables      INV2          50
I do not know how to configure that or is it possible. I have not seen "document" as Define Document Splitting Characteristics...
Help will be rewarded...

Split Payment Advice in FEBA

In FEBA, there is functionlity of FEBA. We are planning to use this.
We tried in our test system, by clicking the split payment advice, nothing appears but the payment advice locked.
Can you please help how to use this Split Payment advice functionality in FEBA.
Thanks,
Abhay

In FEBA, there is functionlity of FEBA. We are planning to use this.
We tried in our test system, by clicking the split payment advice, nothing appears but the payment advice locked.
Can you please help how to use this Split Payment advice functionality in FEBA.
Thanks,
Abhay

FM splits payments

Hello gurus,
could you help me with this:
standard FM tables don't have exact information on actual payments by commitment items. if payment was partual and it was paid for one commitment item (document has two commitment items), FM spilts amount on both commitment items according to line amount .
Example:
if you have invoice on
111101 1000 eur
111105 1500 eur
than you have payment on
111105 1200 eur
no matter how you enter FI document on payment it splits payment as follows in FM tables:
111101 480 eur
111105 720 eur
How to solve this problem, I need a correct result in FM tables?
Thanks,
Natalja

Hi
In releases below EHP4 it is not possible to update payments selecting by the FM acct assgnment from the expense lines, since the vendor line is the one which is   actually selected for payment and then the system splits the paid amounts among the account assignments from the expense line items, according to your settings for online payment update. This is   standard design.
There is a functionality available in EHP4, which might at least allow
you to pay by Fund.
Have a look at this documentation:
[http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/42/fbded750e61febe10000000a422035/frameset.htm]
Enterprise Business Functions ->Accounting ->Public Sector Management -> PSM, Fund Accounting
It is delivered with business function PSM_FA_CI.
There are nevertheless some requirements. I have extracted this info which may be helpful:
PSM, Fund Accounting
Partial Payment by G/L Account Assignment
You can use this function to partially pay your open liabilities for
each fund or other G/L account assignment. This means that, for each
single invoice, the amount paid is spread over all the funds related to
the expense line for which the payment is carried out.
Partial Payment by General Ledger Account Assignment
Use
Usually, the amounts in Financial Accounting (FI) documents are split to
the General Ledger (G/L) over the split characteristics (G/L account
assignments) in the included line items. The amount is spread over all
the account assignments involved. In standard FI transactions, splitting
by selected account assignments is not possible.
Cheers
Mar

We would like to have a possibility to enable SAP to handle split payments

Hi SD Gurus,
We would like to have a possibility to enable SAP to handle split payments of 1 order. One order invoiced on one document should have two due dates shown on the final invoice to the customer ( payment 50% in October, 50% in November) and should be posted like this in SAP.
Weather it is possible.
Thanks in advance for providing the valuable information.
Best Regards,
Jack

Hi Shiva,
Thanks for your reply, But the payment term option is good but when we create the invoice were it is picking up the whole document value. Say if Sales order value is 4000.
But when doing the invoice it should have 2000. and in the final invoice it should have 2000
when we check in the final invoice document flow it should display both the invoice dates.
Please kindly help in this reagard.
Regards.

Splitting payment terms

In the pay terms wherein the terms are in the form of 10%30%60% and so on, The system after making advances or booking the invoice the system is showing the amount splitted in the vendor account. We have to show the vendor account with single line.
Can anybody explain the advantages and disadvantages in the above matter.

Hi BSR,
If you do not have items splitted for the vendor document, how will you show this invoice in the aging report whenever the particular amount goes due?
This is corrct behaviour and this is the only way to achive the desired results from installment payment terms.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

How to split payments according to SCB. Indicator ?

Hi Team,
We are working with China Client. We have done the BCM config. We are dealing with payments for both goods &Diff. type of services. And we are using SCB indicators to segregate the service payments. Here according to client requirements we have to do the separate payments for both goods & diff. services according to the payment type.
For E.g.:- Here we have invoices for same vendor in same currency i.e. USD for goods-100USD, service 1 – 200USD and service 2- 300 USD. But in F110 these 3 invoices are picked as single item (for goods, service 1 & service 2 invoices) so single pyt order generated in the proposal then it will reflect as No. of Txns – 1 instead of 3 in DMEE. Here we have to generate 3 payment orders instead of 1 as per client’s requirement.
Even if we enable “Individual Pyt” option in vendor master data then each invoice is consider as individual item. For E.g. If we have 2 invoices for goods, service1 & Service 2 each. Then these invoices will display as 6 items in F110 proposal instead of 3 payments (Txns. according to the goods/service type).
Is it possible to group the payments according to the payment type (like goods, service 1, service 2 and so on) instead of currency for F110 Run?
Awaiting for the inputs.
Thanks in Advance!
Regards,
Lakshmi S

Hi Lakshmi
Answer to your question, is this group key applicable for all the payment methods in vendor master under that co.code?
Yes it is applicable to all payment methods assigned to the vendor master under that company code.
The config settings are at client level, but you can assign different grouping key to same vendor master in different company codes...finally what is assigned per vendor per company code is what F110 payment run would pick up.
Test the scenario and confirm my understanding also.
Regards
Deepak

How to handle Order/Invoice with split Payment terms ?

Hi we are implementing 11.5.9 for one of our sites...
we have a situation wherein we charge the customer on placing the Order, on shipping the
goods and on their acceptance...
For example,Assume total order is $200,000. 10% on placing order; 20% on shipping: and 70%
when customer accepts.
10% - 20,000
20% - 40,000
70% - 140,000
We need to issue invoices at each stage too...
Can anyone suggest a way out ??
thanks in advance..

Hi,
After much thought, My knowledge took me to Customization way to this Scenario.
1. Define Order type to close immediately after delivery.
2. Design a Invoice Print report, which will bring details into a TEMP table from Order depending on Order status.
i.e. Order booked -- 1 line inserted into temp table with 10% of order amount and status as Booked.
The Invoice will be printed using this details and an interface program should fire, which will interface this line to ra_interface_lines_all.(Plan program as per your needs. This is just a test case I have taken)
3. On next run, after delivery, the Line status will change to Delivered, which will insert another line into TEMP table which current record flag 'Y'. Prints and Interfaces the invoices to AR.
Similarly next step.
Design of this TEMP table and other validations, you can discuss with Technical Consultant. I think, we can achieve this only with this minimum customization.
Standard application is just giving workarounds and not perfect solution to this.
Regards,
Sridhar

Italy long tax code descriptions

Some tax code descriptions for italy are quite long and the user is saying that the description needs to match the exact description characters, it cannot be cutted off due to legal reasons.
For example, the full description of the tax code above should be:
IT - 20% Acquisti con Reverse Charge- Art.17(3), DPR 633/1972- Iva indetraibile
However the field size is 50 characters lenght.
Any light on this is appreciated.

in IMG > SAP NetWeaver > General settings > define countries > country specific checkings you define per country what checks are carried out. For some fields SAP has supplied harcoded rules.
You should not test with ANY number, use a correct number given from vendor or customer.
If it is not possible to enter this number, investigate the root cause,by looking at the message detail. Then you should search OSS if there was a legal change and a recommendation what to do.

Payment Term/BP on the level of Charge type in FWO

According to business process I have 2 variants of payment term for transportation with payer:
1)      Prepaid (paid by Agency1(Payer1) in POL port of Loading)
2)      Collect (paid by Agency2(Payer2) in POD port of discharge)
3)      Today customer has a requirement to issue several settlements from one FWO to different business partners on the level of charge type.
Example:
BP Role: Payer
BP : Payer 1
Payment term: will pay with term prepaid:
Charge type1 - NTFR (Net Ocean Freight)
Charge type2 - BAF (Bunker Adjustment Factor)
BP Role: Payer
BP : Payer 2
Payment term: will pay with term collect:
Charge type3 - DTHC
The problem is how to combine several terms(prepaid/collect/direct) with several BP Roles(Payer)/BP(Payer1/Payer2)on the level of charge type(service) in FWO.
From the fisrt sight this case could be some way covered by standard on 9.1 functionality of «Charge type activation based on incoterm».
But at the same time we some issues with this standard solution, because we need to split payer and term not only for the whole stage, but also for different charges in one stage. An example of this could be port to port transportation without any pre-carriage or on-carriage, but with OTHC/DTHC that could be paid in any term(P/C) separately by the appropriate agent in POL or POD. At the same time all the transportation costs will be associated only with one stage of transportation.
Do anybody has an idea how to split payment term deeper than level of stage?

Hi,
You can use the "Flexible Settlement" function in TM9.1.
Assign the charge types to settlement group.
Assign the settlement group to settlement rule.
Assign the settlement rule to settlement profile.
Best Regards
Clark Huang

Issue with payment run

hi guru's
We have one vendor in two company code one is India and one is USA. The bank account number is different in vendor master data but both accounts in the same country.
When we make the payment run it has to split to different account based on the currency say for example in this case INR and USD.
What we are doing at the moment is whenever we want to make payment to say for example bank account 123456789 we will delete one bank in master data that is 987654321 and make payment. Whenever we want to make payment to 987654321 we will delete 123456789 bank in the master data and make payment.
Is there any alternative way to split payment according to two bank or 3 banks based on the vendor master data?
Thanks
Sunitha

I don't know a way to split, but to make separate payments you do not need to change the vendor master all the time. In the vendor master, assign a unique value in the field BnkT for each bank account that you have in the vendor master; this 4-character value is free text (you can enter anything you want as long as you can distinguish). You then enter this key while entering vendor invoice in SAP (either via FB60 or MIRO). You will see the field as "Part. Bank" in Payment tab of FB60/MIRO. The payment program then pays the item via that bank in the vendor master to which this key is assigned.

Running Payment Program before Due Date

Hi Gurus,
I have a problem.
I want to run the payment program -Tcode F110- before the due date and I need the document posting date to be the same as the due date.
How could I sort it out?
Please help,
Samuel

Your requirement can't be fulfilled by standard set-up, because SAP payment run can post with only one posting date in a single run. This posting date will be what you are entering in the parameters, and system will not split payment posting date separately based on Due date. You can group your items based on due date and can pay future due items as well but you can't split your payment posting with different payment posting date based on due date in a same payment run.
You can possibly do following workaround.
- Run vendor open item report (T-code FBL1N) and sort it based on Net Due column (if net due date column is not available change the layout to populate it). And decide for items with which due dates you want to settle today. Lets say you want to settle for following due date xx/xx/xxx, xx/xx/xxx1, xx/xx/xxxx2
- Then you should run three payments run separately.
Payment run 1 parameters- Posting Date=xx/xx/xxxx, Next Posting Date=xx/xx/xxxx+1
Payment run 2 parameters- Posting Date=xx/xx/xxxx1, Next Posting Date=xx/xx/xxxx2
Payment run 3 parameters- Posting Date=xx/xx/xxxx2, Next Posting Date=xx/xx/xxxx3
Imp: Note that Posting date=Due Date and Next Payment Run Date=Due Date1 in the parameters+
This will involve more than one payment runs in a day but will satisfy your requirement
Thanks
Ranjit

Spl G/l Payments

Dear Sir,
We had done Retention, ie from a normal invoice we have transfered to a special G/l account , using 39 Y posting key, now when i want to do payment for that retention document ie i want to do partial payment, its shows the feild in gray, ie i can only make full payment for that document for that retention document, but i want to do partial payment..........is there any special setting for that can u please guide me
Regards,
R.Ramakrishnaraj

Hi,
I understand your problem.. i faced the same problem..
What i did was a DPR for the partial payment to be made and then did a clearing for the vendor so that the balance in retention account is correct.
Reward me points...
Regards
Prasanna

Pmnt block changed when amount split use - how this funct. set?

Hi experts,
when i use bookmark - amount split in tcode mir7 bookmark Payment changed, a specialy pmnt block changed. I set Maintain Terms of Payment with Default value for the payment blocking key = N. But when i fill amount split payment blocking key change to released for payment. What this function logic and where this one can i set? I want that pmnt block dont change when function amount split ude.
thnx very much for your answers
Laco

Hi,
thnx for your answerd.
Day limit was not set in T052, and items block dont use in mir7.
Use only header pmnt block, and use amount split to in header. Payment term fill in bookmark Amount split when this use of course.
I try this in many other customers what have SAP ECC 6.0 and tehe result is same. When i fill header invoice in mir7 in bookmark Paymant pmnt block proposed N - block workflow approval and than i go to bookmark Amount split and pliting amont and fill paymant terms and than i back to bookmark Paymant and pmnt block change - released for payment. Why?! What this governed? PO in this time dont fill.
thanx very much.
L.

DPR 633/1972 - Split Payment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for