Dreamweavwr CS6 Mac no Image Dimensions in Assets tab?

I have a imac with mavericks. I have a file open. I let it sit open for over an hour. I have restarted it a few times. Still no image dimensions. The size and file name appear though.

In mine, the dimensions show. You probably need to scroll the window horizontally to see the tab, you can then resize it by grabbing the line between the Name and Dimensions tabs and sliding it over..
EDIT: OP, I'm on Windows7, so I don't have any info for you unfortunately. Maybe try rebuilding the site cache from the Files window's menu, or clearing the program cache:http://forums.adobe.com/thread/494811

Similar Messages

Photoshop CS6 Mac: Placed images are not moveable

Anyone else have this bug? Placed images cannot be moved or transformed, at least initially. I am finding that after a period of time passes (half minute or more), the image is sometimes 'released' and is then transformable. But it can take a couple of minutes. Very bizarre.

What OS version and what are your Performance Preferences?
Boilerplate-text:
Are Photoshop and OS fully updated and have you performed the usual trouble-shooting routines (trashing prefs by keeping command-alt-shift/ctrl-alt-shift pressed while starting Photoshop after making sure all customized presets like Actions, Patterns, Brushes etc. have been saved and making a note of the Preferences you’ve changed, 3rd party plug-ins deactivation, system maintenance, cleaning caches, font validation, etc.)?

CS6 / Mac : I want to placate hand writen words on a jpg image.

CS6 / Mac : I want to placate hand writen words on a jpg image. The words are to be extracted from a letter I photographed on jpg. I guessed that was asked before, if anyone can redirect me to an appropriate tuto I didn't find yet. Thx.

Plonk, what I gave you was a very quick and easy way to achieve your goal, but it was, perhaps, simplistic. But without seeing the underlying image, or the scanned letter. My method relied on the text being black, and the paper it was written on being as near white as possible. It also need the underlying image to have no large areas of very dark tones, or obviously the black text will not show against it.
So to make it a decent test, I found this crumpled letter with a very off white background:
Adding a Levels Adjustment layer, and setting it thus:
I can move all those off white tones (as indicated by the right side of the histogram) to full white, like this
Notice the red arrow on the Levels Properties. Clicking on that icon clips it to the letter layer beneath it, so that it _only_ operates on that layer and no others. This is important. Incidentally, you should also set the levels layer's Blend mode to Luminosity - this prevents colour artifacts creeping in.
Placing the scanned letter layer, with its clipped Levels adjustment layer, we get the following. On the left the Letter layer Blend mode is set to Multiply. You could also use Darken (I bet you can workout why that would work) but Multiply gives a more solid black. The second example has the Blend mode set to Divide. This is a useful trick because it still gives contrast over dark tones, but the text would start to get thin where it overlays very light tones. The third example is the original letter with no Levels layer.
If you work in layout, you'll know that editors chose their images with overlaid type in mind. It would be fairly trivial to make the type black over light tones and white over dark tones by using layer masks with two type layers. You select either the dark or light area, and add a layer mask to the appropriate type layer. Then copy the mask to the other type layer and invert it. That ensures a perfect transition from one to the other.

Can a premiere pro CS6 project done on a pc be opened by PPCC2014 on a mac without manually relinking every asset?

Can a premiere pro CS6 project done on a pc be opened by PP CC2014 on a mac without manually relinking every asset? Relinking would take longer for me than just recutting my colleague's footage.

Use the Project Manager to collect all of the assets on the PC. Then use that to start your editing on the Mac.

Finder - Image Dimensions column

Hi I have thousands of files I am organizing and want the image dimensions in column view. You can do this on windows 95 how come not Mac OS X (which I love)!??
Can somebody tell me how to do this - it would be a lot of help!
Thanks

Alas you cannot have it ALL ways...
Column view is basically a cleaner version of List view - without any of the file information visible at a glance. If you click any item shown in column view - the preview to the right should show the dimensions at the bottom, along with other data.
If you want to see all of the dimensions at a glance, you can set them in Icon View. I have the View Options for all of my folders that are full of images (which is the bulk of my folders, as I am a designer) set as below.
Double-click on the folder containing the images
Click on the Icon View thumbnail at the top of the finder window
Go to View / Show View Options
Select "Always open in icon view"
Slide the "Icon size" all the way to the right (to 128 x 128)
Slide the "Grid spacing" all the way to the left (to keep them grouped close together)
Select "*_Show item info_*" (*this is what you are after*)
Select "Show icon preview" (if this is not selected)
Select an option in "Arrange by" (this will sort / arrange them after the changes)
Select "Use as defaults" at the bottom, if you want this to be the default settings for any folder that has been set to Icon View.
This setting shows me everything I need to see quickly, and allows me to bypass the Cover Flow view, which I love - but it is only useful on the odd occasion for two reasons:
1.) It doesn't play friendly with all of my image files, it usually looks horrible (BIG deal breaker!)
2.) If I am looking over a folder FULL of images, I can usually find what I am looking for quicker by using the overview that Icon View allows, rather than flipping though the images one at a time.

Preserve image dimensions

Hi I am about to do my ACE exam for ID
So i have been studying away - and am not happy with the 'preseve image dimension' option
Here is a practice question from the adobe site (with supplied answer)
4.1 Given a scenario, determine the best settings for choosing and placing an image
You want to replace an image from a selected frame. The new image is larger than the original
image. You want the new image to be imported at the same scaling percentage as the original.
What should you do?
A. hold down Shift as you click the Relink button in the Links panel
B. hold down Option/Alt as you click the Update button in the Links panel
C. before replacing the image, deselect Preserve Image Dimensions When Relinking in the
File Handling pane of the Preferences dialog box
D. before replacing the image, select Preserve Image Dimensions When Relinking in the File
Handling pane of the Preferences dialog box
Correct answer: C
BUT it says this in the help file
Choose how relinked graphics are scaled
When you relink to replace one graphic with a different source file, you can keep the image dimensions of the file that’s being replaced, or you can display the incoming file in its actual dimensions.
Choose Edit > Preferences > File Handling (Windows) or InDesign > Preferences > File Handling (Mac OS).
Choose Preserve Image Dimensions When Relinking if you want images to appear at the same size as the images they’re replacing. Deselect this option to have relinked images appear at their actual size
Is this a contradiction or am i being thick
Thanks

Sorry Peter
I think I must have hit it by mistake
But just experimented with it on 6.04
I have image 210x297
I replace this with preserve image dimensions ON -new image is 210x1776
I replace this with preserve image dimensions OFF -new image is 25.013x211.552 --- which is the same size as if imported into a new frame
Doesnt this make the help file correct and the adobe practice exam wrong ?
I assume the original to be the image that is being replaced
4.1 Given a scenario, determine the best settings for choosing and placing an image
You want to replace an image from a selected frame. The new image is larger than the original
image. You want the new image to be imported at the same scaling percentage as the original.
What should you do?
A. hold down Shift as you click the Relink button in the Links panel
B. hold down Option/Alt as you click the Update button in the Links panel
C. before replacing the image, deselect Preserve Image Dimensions When Relinking in the
File Handling pane of the Preferences dialog box
D. before replacing the image, select Preserve Image Dimensions When Relinking in the File
Handling pane of the Preferences dialog box
Correct answer: C
BUT it says this in the help file
Choose how relinked graphics are scaled
When you relink to replace one graphic with a different source file, you can keep the image dimensions of the file that’s being replaced, or you can display the incoming file in its actual dimensions.
Choose Edit > Preferences > File Handling (Windows) or InDesign > Preferences > File Handling (Mac OS).
Choose Preserve Image Dimensions When Relinking if you want images to appear at the same size as the images they’re replacing. Deselect this option to have relinked images appear at their actual size

Image dimensions not consistent (Nikon vs. Apple / Aperture)

I just realized something strange about RAW (NEF) images taken with my new Nikon D700 and copied to my Mac: according to Nikon's specifications (http://tinyurl.com/54cdn9) full FX size RAW images are supposed to be 4,256 x 2,832 pixels.
My Mac however thinks these images are 4,256 x 2,828 pixels - no matter whether I look at the Finder info (Get Info), open the RAW file in Preview or import it into Aperture.
But when I open the very same RAW file with Photoshop, do some basic RAW processing and look at the image dimensions once the file has been opened, it has the 4,256 x 2,832 pixels that it actually should have. Same thing when imported into Adobe Lightroom, by the way.
I remember also having realized this differnce in dimensions with my D300. My Mac thought it had different dimensions than the ones as specified by Nikon and recognized by non-Apple applications.
Now, I am quite a bit concerned about losing 4 pixels in height - not of course because the images get dramatically smaller, but because they are (incorrectly) resized and lose quality.
My questions would be:
Am I the only one with that inconsistency? What dimensions do your D700 or D300 images have? Are these consistent to Nikon's specifications?
Do you agree that those 4 pixels affect image quality?
Or is there a good reason why Apple is tampering with image dimensions and I just don't get it? What am I missing?
Comments welcome!

Garp wrote:
So what you're saying is that while the number of pixels is different in height, there is no sort of scaling etc. applied to the images when rendering them in different height as specified by the camera manufacturer?
Or at least very, very little. It is not even sure that Nikon's calculations give a more correct value than Apple's.
What if it were not 4 pixels that were different, but 200 or 400? Wouldn't some distortion be visible in the images or would these 400 px just get cropped away?
I'm sure it would be visible at 400 pixels difference.
I apologize if I may sound ignorant, but I just don't see any reason why an app would not adhere to a camera manufacturer's specs and apply differing image dimensions for no apparent reason, even if it's just 4 pixels?
I do not know the exact reason either, but I'm sure there is one. What I know is that interpreting a RAW file is not trivial. The same discrepancy is there with both my D300 and my D40X.
By the way, I tried as you suggested, fired up my Windows XP on VMWare and installed IrfanView and Picasa - while IrfanView follows Nikons specifications with RAW dimensions of 4256 x 2832, Picasa does not: 4284 x 2844.
Very strange thing... and I thought I was experienced in digital imaging and photography... hmmm.
I'm sure you are. But we cannot all know everything. You can search the forum for other discussions on the subject. I'm sure you can google for an indepth explanation as well, even though I do not know which key words to use.

Adobe Bridge CS6 (Mac) won't open .arw files from my Sony RX100. How do I get and install the right version of Camera Raw?

Adobe Bridge CS6 (Mac) won't open .arw files from my Sony RX100. I was told to update Camera Raw to at least 7.2. I tried to download this but got a DNG Converter instead. Where is Camera Raw? (it does not show up in a search of my hard drive. There is a folder of camera profiles but no extension or plug-in with this name). How do I find out what version I have already? How do I get the correct version? . . . OR . . . is it the case that Bridge will never open Sony raw files directly and I will have to do a separate conversion process every time I want to use a raw file??. Can someone explain this?
Thanks.

A Good samaritan answered this for me on another forum
How to update Camera Raw

Why can I no longer import EDITED photo from my iPad to my Mac using Image Capture from Snapseed app?

Why can I no longer import EDITED photo from my iPad to my Mac using Image Capture? This is farcical and a real problem having to email them individually to myself and is totally inefficient time wise compared to previously using image capture! Why change this when it was working well and very quickly until the latest change. Now I have to move files from downloads into an appropriate folder, after emailing each individual edited image to myself, then I have to open in Photoshop and rename the file. This is ludicrous and takes forever to do!

Thank you! I suppected it would be in the settings somewhere. I' ve much to learn...get myself into trouble pushing buttons I don't really understand.

Is there a Preserve Image Dimension when Relinking Setting in Framemaker 9?

Hi,
I am using Framemaker 9 (structured Frame) and would like to know if there is a setting (similar to InDesign) that preserves image dimensions when relinking. In InDesign, you can turn this setting off so that the updated linked graphic will not scale or move in the document. Does Framemaker have a similar setting? We use Illustrator CS3 to create graphics. These graphics are then saved to Adobe Acrobat X Pro PDF files. I Import by Reference the PDF file using the Grahic element in Structured Framemaker. If I make any changes to the graphic file in Illustrator, the graphic that was imported into the Framemaker document shifts inside the anchored frame and then I have to recenter all the updated graphics in Framemaker. Is there a setting in Framemaker that will allow me to update a graphic file in Illustrator without having to recenter it in Framemaker?
I currently have the following File Handling & Clipboard options selected in Illustrator:
Copy AS:
-PDF
-AICB (no transparency suuport)
-Preserve Appearance and OverPrints
But, these settings do not seem to help much for the imported graphic files in Framemaker.
I appreciate any information you can provide.
Thank you for your help.

*** haven't checked, because I don't have any pre-9.0 files easily available *** ... but from what I remember, if you're really just viewing the files in 9.0 you should need to save them explicitly back to an earlier version. FM may mark the files as "changed" when it opens them, but that's because it checks things like datestamps and cross-references. If you do not, yourself, explicitly change any content in the file you have opened, you don't need to save the changes; just close the file unsaved. Check my supposition with a couple of files before relying on it! And other people will be able to give you a more detailed explanation of why file you haven't touched yourself still show up as "changed".

Image dimension limitations in Photoshop Elements?

I'm trying to find out what the maximum image dimensions are for Photoshop Elements 8.0
I know Photoshop CS increased the previous limit of 30,000x30,000 to 300,000x300,000.
According to this page, PSE 5 and 6 were limited to 30k:
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/402/kb402760.html
Yet according to this page, PSE 5 can reportedly handle 300k:
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/333/333456.html
I'd like to upgrade from Elements v4 to v8, but one thing I need to ensure is that it can handle >30000px images, otherwise I'll have to go for CS5...
Can anyone give me a definitive answer, please?

When you installed the plugin(s), the installer should have created a folder in
C:\Program Files (x86)\Image Trends Inc\Hemi 1.0
Go to the Hemi 1.0 folder and copy the three plugins that don't say x64 and paste them into the pse 11 editor plugins folder
C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Photoshop Elements 11\Plug-Ins

Bridge CS6 (Mac) Forgetting Labels

I am having a long standing problem with Bridge "forgetting" labels I apply to folders and files. I have trashed preference files, reset the preferences and even re-installed from scratch. The problem persists. The strange part is that it only affects one particular file heirarchy; the others that I manage with Bridge seem to be fine.
Any ideas?

Thanks! If there is a workaround or simple solution, I would be very glad if you could inform me.
Christian
(signature removed by the Admin)
Am 14.05.2012 um 13:49 schrieb FrankBiederich:
Re: Bridge CS6 Mac XMP File Info Panel Bug: can't copy and paste metadata
created by FrankBiederich in XMP SDK - View the full discussion
Thanks for your report; we'll look into it.
Frank
Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: Re: Bridge CS6 Mac XMP File Info Panel Bug: can't copy and paste metadata
To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at Re: Bridge CS6 Mac XMP File Info Panel Bug: can't copy and paste metadata. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
Start a new discussion in XMP SDK by email or at Adobe Forums
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.
Message was edited by: Arpit Kapoor

Bridge CS6 Mac XMP File Info Panel Bug: can't copy and paste metadata

The cmd-keys / shortcuts doesn't work in the xmp file info panel btw. in the xmp / iptc fields (e.g. cmd+c, cmd+v, ...) of Adobe Bridge CS6 (Mac OS 10.6.8 and 10.7.3). You are not able to cut and paste info from one box to another like previous versions.
This bug only appears in the xmp file info window (opened via alt+i) in Bridge CS6 - if you edit information or metadata in the file info panel in Photoshop CS6 copy and paste from one field to another works.
The shortcuts also work under Windows (tested under Vista).
I noticed this minor bug already one in the Photoshop CS6 Beta more than one months ago. I hoped that this was corrected in the official test version, but unfortunately it is not. Although it is a minor bug, it is IMHO a basic function and would be very helpful in my daily work - it is too bad, that such a small thing is making working with the application a little bit annoying.

Thanks! If there is a workaround or simple solution, I would be very glad if you could inform me.
Christian
(signature removed by the Admin)
Am 14.05.2012 um 13:49 schrieb FrankBiederich:
Re: Bridge CS6 Mac XMP File Info Panel Bug: can't copy and paste metadata
created by FrankBiederich in XMP SDK - View the full discussion
Thanks for your report; we'll look into it.
Frank
Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: Re: Bridge CS6 Mac XMP File Info Panel Bug: can't copy and paste metadata
To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at Re: Bridge CS6 Mac XMP File Info Panel Bug: can't copy and paste metadata. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
Start a new discussion in XMP SDK by email or at Adobe Forums
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.
Message was edited by: Arpit Kapoor

Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 (mac) will not completely launch.

After a few weeks idol my Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 (mac) will not completely launch. It tells me a serious error has occurred, it shuts down and the circle continues. I've even reloaded the app and it happens again. I did upgraded to Yosemite but I can't find anyone else having probs with Yosemite. Any ideas. No luck on the adobe site.

>did upgraded to Yosemite
CS6 is about 3 years old... even the latest Cloud versions had to have updates to be compatible... since you have "reloaded" (was that a full uninstall and reinstall?) I have no other suggestions

RTL & Indian Language Support for Indesign CS6 Mac

Hi,
I am using Adobe Indesign CS6 Mac version and need support to using Arabic and Indian Language Support. I am not able to write this language. When I am pasting from Word or anywhere text is going cracked.
I also learn to enable language support from Character setting but I can't find Kashidas option on my Indesign.
It will be very helpful if some one support how to enable this option or download.
Best Regards,
Rakesh

That's because Larry is correct, and Ellis is correct about you needing to take Larry's advice if you don't have the World-Ready Composer in your menu. You need something like the World Tools plugin from InTools to access the complex-script tools not available in the menus in your install of CS6.
(Or you could employ Ellis' other suggestion and move to the Cloud. But World Tools is rather less expensive in the long term.)

Dreamweavwr CS6 Mac no Image Dimensions in Assets tab?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for