Driver e1000g problem - patch 118844-30

Hi,
the situation is like this. I have fujitsu-siemens pc and Solaris 10 03/05 x86 installed. I wanted to patch it with latest recommended patch cluster. After that I was not able to get to default router and switch did not see my mac anymore. I looked in the patch cluster and removed patch by patch till the kernel patch 118844-30. I finished my todays troubleshooting with one big ZERO :-), but it works now a can sleep well. There was no error reported in log files, no smf failed, nothing. If anyone knows, where is the real problem or how to apply some work-around, it would be great.
Le

Yes, I also experienced the same thing with 118844-30 and 118822-30. It seems other people are also having issues with 118855-xx. I simply bypassed these patches, after a painful rebuild, and now everything is OK, including all other recommended patches.

Similar Messages

Kernel patch 118844-30 problem

I have an AMD-64 computer and when I try to install patch 118844-30 (and dependent patch for send mail), and restart, I get a million error messages at bootup, including "is syslogd running?". I had to reinstall the whole OS to get back to normal. Other updates worked fine.

Yes, I also experienced the same thing with 118844-30 and 118822-30. It seems other people are also having issues with 118855-xx. I simply bypassed these patches, after a painful rebuild, and now everything is OK, including all other recommended patches.

Patch 118844-28 fails to install on Ultra 20?

We're trying to run the standard updatemanager on our Ultra 20 running Solaris 10 x86. We've installed patches a number of times but we're hitting a wall with the recent kernel patch, 118844-28.
This patch shows up as needing to be applied in both the updatemanager gui as well as when we run smpatch analyze. The problem is that it doesn't seem like it will install even though the tools say that the installation procedure was successful. Specifically: we instruct the gui to install the patch, it goes off and looks like it's installing, it comes back and says that the installation is complete and successful and that we need to reboot the machine, we tell it to reboot the machine and it does. But when the machine comes back up the updatemanager (and smpatch) still says that this patch needs to be applied. And showrev says that we're still back at version 27. So it seems like it's properly applying the patch but then the patch isn't actually applied.
We tried to install the patch by hand with smpatch add in single user mode and we had a similar experience. The only exception being that the patch process complained that we had to have patch 117435-02 installed (which we do).
Has anybody seen this before? Has anybody gotten this patch to install on this hardware?

Yes, I agree with that fix- I just did it a little opposite:
# eeprom boot-device=/pci@0,0/pci-ide@11,1/ide@0/cmdk@0,0:a
which added an extra alias (permanently) to my 'BIOS' settings-
# eeprom | grep boot
bootpath=/pci@0,0/pci-ide@7/ide@0/cmdk@0,0:a
boot-device=/pci@0,0/pci-ide@7/ide@0/cmdk@0,0:a
I re-ran the 10 Rec. Cluster and it not only installed the kernel patch, but, a handful of other patches in the bundle too.
--David

Unable to boot the sytem after applying kernel patch 118844-27

We have an hp ProLiant DL380 Storage server connected to HP StorageWorks Moduler Smart Array 30 via SCSI. Solaris 03/05 was installed previously on this system with kernel 118844-20. When I queried and installed all required patches with 'smpatch add -i .. ' command, all patches applied and the system is rebooted. After reboot, the system kept restarting. I followed the instructions on Sun Alert document 102087, and installed grub using 01/06 1st CDROM. It installed successfully, but problem persisted. The systems started booting, but before printing 'Configuring devices' the system rebooted again. Providing -v option to the kernel, it lastly printed a PCI device id (/pci@....) and after 2-3 seconds rebooted again.
Finally I had to reinstall the solaris (this time 01/06). The disk was accessible after booting with CD ROM, and I was able to get cylinder numbers of disk, and I installed the new system to the root partition of the other live upgrade environment. The boot disk was partitioned under linux, it was three partitions, Solaris2 (50GB),Solaris(4GB),Linux(18GB). Installation medium told that the fdisk partition was invalid, and i repartitioned the whole disk again.
System up and running Solaris 10 01/06 now, but the strange thing is that, previously hard disk (both boot disk and disks on array) locations were identified as '/dev/rdsk/c0tx' but now, the system sees that hard disks at '/dev/c1tx' and CDROM at '/dev/c0t0'.
Now I want to ask tow questions:
* Could this disk number change made the system unbootable previously?
* May I safely apply patch 118844-28 to the system
-Thanks

Here's a similar topic https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=536210 also if that doesn't work you should install vesa as it also says it's not found in your log.

Patch 118844-21 killed my laptop!

Solaris 3/05 loaded just fine, recently patch 118844-21 installed GRUB as a bootloader, replacing the one that Sol 10 3/05 installed. Now the machine does not complete a boot. It loads the copyright notice and then hangs. Before this patch my laptop was quite happy. What gives?

Hi,
I'm new on Solaris, I installed the Solaris 10 3/05 on my lap and yesterday I installed the patches recommended and today I found that I can't boot with Solaris. I think I have the same problem but I don't know how to uninstall the patches that you mentioned.
Can you help me?
Thanks.

What driver or software patches do i need to install in my windows 7 laptop, in order for the laptop to capture Bluetooth messages, which is possible with window 8?

Hi,
i am connecting a Bluetooth device to my laptop. I notice that Message Analyzer could capture Bluetooth messages only if I am using windows 8? I am using window 7. What driver or software patches do i need to install in my windows 7 laptop, in order for
the laptop to capture Bluetooth messages, which is possible with window 8?
Also, i notice that using window 8, i am able to capture Bluetooth message but i am not able to display wireless perfromance statistics such as signal strength, throughput, etc? Is there a way for me to get such information.
Please help.

If you look at the link you sent me:Default Trace Scenarios
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj659262.aspx
"Windows 8 Bluetooth (Windows 8/Windows Server 2012 or later)
Troubleshoot Bluetooth issues"
So what about Windows 8 earlier? Not supported?
My question: What driver or software patches do i need to install in my windows 7 laptop, in order for the laptop to capture Bluetooth messages, which is possible with window 8?

I have a macbook pro from 2006, my internal cd drive is not working and i'm trying to install factory definitions from an external cd drive. the problem is that when i press c nothing happens only appears an interrogation folder.

i have a macbook pro from 2006, my internal cd drive is not working and i'm trying to install factory definitions from an external cd drive. the problem is that when i press c nothing happens only appears an interrogation folder. or sometimes appears the apple logo and than back again to the interrogation folder... Help please!!!!

mcbsousa wrote:
hm... Is there any chance of making the bootable usb file and send it by dropbox or something like that? than put it in a pen drive and connect to the mac??
Sending by Dropbox where, To who, to what computer? As your does not start up.
You need to take at least the OS disc to a work Mac computer and create DMG from the OS install disc then restore that DMG to USB thumb drive. Then you can boot the computer from that thumb drive and install the OS. That is if your hard drive is functioning correctly.
Then you can use the App disc in the external CD/DVD drive to load up all the included Applications that come with your version of OS X.

CF 10 getting random resets : Detail: [Macromedia][SQLServer JDBC Driver]A problem occurred when attempting to contact the server (Server returned: Connection reset).

These resets appear to coincide with a clearing of the cached queries for the DSN from memory, breaking all my sub queries that try to use the initial cached one. I am grasping at straws to discover the reset culprit, the DSN tests always show OK, there is not packet loss at the switch level. If anyone has some suggestions, I am all ears!
The resets are completely random and under no load. My sql 2008 r2 box is set to unlimited connections.
An example of a DSN setup is :
Maintain Connections [x]
String Format [ ]
Max Pooled Statements 100
Timeout 20 Interval 7
Query Timeout 0
Login Timeout 30
CLOB [ ]
BLOB [ ]
Long Text Buffer 64000
Blob Buffer 64000
Validate Connection [ ]
I am running the following :
CF Enterprise 10,0,13,287689
Tomcat 7.0.23.0
Ubuntu 1204 x64
Java VM 20.4-b02
Java 1.6 (Sun Microsystems Inc)
I have seen it suggested to uncheck the maintain connections advanced options but this doesn't seem like a good approach to the problem and will cause more stress on the sql box IMHO.
I have also seen it suggested to enable Validate Connection but documentation on this is a bit sparse...
Here are more examples of the initial reset error and then the subsequent cache related errors :
Database Error Information:
Native Error Code: 0
SQL State: 08S01
Query Error: [Macromedia][SQLServer JDBC Driver]A problem occurred when attempting to contact the server (Server returned: Connection reset). Please ensure that the server parameters passed to the driver are correct and that the server is running. Also ensure that the maximum number of connections have not been exceeded for this server.
Custom Error Code: 08S01
Database Error Information:
Native Error Code: 0
SQL State: n/a
Query Error:
Query Of Queries runtime error.
Table named GlobalDetails was not found in memory. The name is misspelled or the table is not defined.
Custom Error Code: n/a
Thanks in advance to anyone who has a suggestion.

Hi, could DBA check MS SQL Server connection logs???
May be server has some limits (for example sessions, memory and e.t.c.)

Oracle Driver / JAR problem

Hi,
Here is the troublesome code.....
public void connect()throws Exception{
          //set up the Driver
          try     {
               //Problem here when running in a JAR
               DriverManager.registerDriver (new oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver());
               JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, "Conencted to database!", "Connected",JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE);
          catch(Exception e){
               System.out.println("Driver initialisation failed");
               JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, "Unable to locate OracleDriver()", "Error in connection",JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE);
          //Make a connection to the database
          try {
               theConnection = DriverManager.getConnection(c.getDbUrl(), c.getUserName(), c.getPassword());
          catch(Exception e) {
               System.out.println("failed to make a connection");
               JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, "Problem in connection. Please check database connection settings and re-try.", "Error in connection",JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE);
     }This code works fine when running via Eclipse, but, when I put it into an executatble JAR, it fails. I know it fails at the line DriverManager.registerDriver (new oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver()); (as you can see in the code above)
Any ideas?
liktid

I replaced
DriverManager.registerDriver (new
oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver());with
Driver driver =
(Driver)Class.forName("oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver
").newInstance();
DriverManager.registerDriver( (java.sql.Driver)
er) driver);now an error gets caught on EVERY occasion (as seen
in the code in the first post), even in eclipse. The
previous version was ok. any further suggestions?
litkidNone of that stuff is necessary. This is sufficient:
Class.forName("oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver");This works in production for me.
Your problem is that your executable JAR manifest Class-Path doesn't include the ojdbc14.jar OR that JAR isn't where your Class-Path says it should be relative to your executable JAR.
%

Problems patching VirtualBox s10x_u8 BE

Hi,
I'm having problems patching a VirtualBox Solaris 10 x86 environment with the latest patch cluster from December.
I've unloaded the zip file in /var/tmp and attempted to apply-prereq to the current BE prior to the ABE. This fails during the checkinstall process for 119255-71 (patching of patchadd etc). These are the first patches applied to this s10x_u8 install - the only additional pkg is SUNWvboxguest.
It reports:
/var/tmp/10_x86_Recommended/patches/119255-71/SUNWinstall-patch-utils-root/install/checkinstall: /var/tmp/10_x86_Recommended/patches/119255-71/SUNWinstall-patch-utils-root/install/checkinstall: cannot open
pkgadd: ERROR: checkinstall script did not complete successfully
I've tried applying this patch outside 'installcluster' using patchadd and the same issue is reported.
I cannot see anything obvious in any of the 'readme's and checked a number of solutions regarding loopback filesystems etc.
Are there any further methods of debugging this issue and does anyone know why this patchadd is not working?

Hi Darren,
Thanks for that - I think I've seen this one before (before Solaris 10) and never twigged that it would/could back to haunt me!
# echo<span style="color:#000000"> "install:x:0:1:installpatch braindamage:/:/bin/true"</span> >> /etc/passwd
# pwconv
# cd /tmp
# patchadd 119255-71
Validating patches...
Loading patches installed on the system...
Done!
Loading patches requested to install.
Done!
Checking patches that you specified for installation.
Done!
Approved patches will be installed in this order:
119255-71
Checking installed patches...
Executing prepatch script...
Installing patch packages...
Patch 119255-71 has been successfully installed.
See /var/sadm/patch/119255-71/log for details
Executing postpatch script...
Patch packages installed:
SUNWinstall-patch-utils-root
SUNWpkgcmdsr
SUNWpkgcmdsu
SUNWswmt
# userdel installI then deleted the user and continued the patching of the alt BE - It did not appear to require the user for the remaining pre-req patches or the other BE!
# cd /var/tmp/10_x*
# ./installcluster --apply-prereq --s10cluster
Setup .......
Solaris 10 x86 Recommended Patch Cluster (2010.01.06)
Application of patches started : 2010.01.14 16:48:36
Applying 120901-03 (1 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 121334-04 (2 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 119255-71 (3 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 119318-01 (4 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 121297-01 (5 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 122035-05 (6 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 127885-01 (7 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 141589-03 (8 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 142252-01 (9 of 9) ... skipped
Application of patches finished : 2010.01.14 16:49:01
Following patches were skipped :
Patches already applied
120901-03     119255-71     121297-01     127885-01     142252-01
121334-04     119318-01     122035-05     141589-03
Installation of prerequisite patches complete.
Install log files written :
/var/sadm/install_data/s10x_rec_cluster_short_2010.01.14_16.48.36.log
/var/sadm/install_data/s10x_rec_cluster_verbose_2010.01.14_16.48.36.log
# lustatus
Boot Environment           Is       Active Active    Can    Copy
Name                       Complete Now    On Reboot Delete Status
s10x_u8a                   yes      no     no        yes    -
s10x_u8b                   yes      yes    yes       no     -
# ./installcluster -B s10x_u8a --s10cluster
Setup ............
Solaris 10 x86 Recommended Patch Cluster (2010.01.06)
Application of patches started : 2010.01.14 16:50:59
Applying 120901-03 ( 1 of 172) ... skipped
Applying 121334-04 ( 2 of 172) ... skipped
Applying 119255-71 ( 3 of 172) ... success
Applying 119318-01 ( 4 of 172) ... skipped
...I'll add a further update once the other 172 patches have been tried and whether the BE boots or not.
Regards, Clive

External drive recognition problem

I am having issues with my iMac recognizing an external drive. I have:
iMac 5,1 10.4.11, Intel Core 2 Duo 2 GHz, 1GB Memory, PIONEER DVR-112d in a BYTECC ME-525U2FW Aluminum External enclosure connected through Firewire.
The iMac initially recognized the drive, no problem. Trouble is, when I turn off the drive and then power it back up, the iMac can't recognize it. I was able to solve it initially by powering down the drive, unplugging it from the firewire, reconnecting to firewire, and the powering up the drive again.
System profiler states all software up to date.
Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks!
drayman86 is online now Report Post Edit/Delete Message

Thanks for the reply.
Has performed this way since install, which was about 72 hours ago.
When first connected through firewire and turned on, drive immediately recognized by iMac. Drive works, both ripping and burning. Turned drive off. Went to power up drive, and problem arose.

Nigpib-linux driver compile problem

I am running SUSE 9.0, and while trying to install nigpib-linux-0.8.6.tar.gz, I get the following compile error:
Your kernel appears to be configured properly to build NI-GPIB for Linux.
Do you want to proceed? [yn] y
gcc -c -O2 -D__KERNEL__ -I/lib/modules/2.4.21-260-default/build/include -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include /lib/modules/2.4.21-260-default/build/include/linux/modversions.h -D__GPIBDRIVER__ -o ib_linux-2.4.21-260-default.o ib_linux.c
ib_linux.c:419:7: missing binary operator before token "("
make: *** [ib_linux-2.4.21-260-default.o] Error 1
Couldn't build driver.
It has to do with the HZ definition.
Thanks for any help anyone can give!

dsb,
Here is a link to a lengthy thread on this very problem. There appears to be a workaround or two mentioned in the post:
Linux Driver Compiling Problem
Let me know if the suggestions in that thread help out!
Craig H.
NI Applications Engineering

Solaris 10 X86 kernel patch 118844-30 ... probably bad

I installed the patch on some Dells. Seemed to run fine.
Actually, I installed 121127-01, 113000-07, and 118344-06
first since they were required by 118844-30.
Some problems have now turned up.
1. When you power cycle one of the patched machines they
refuse to boot with
Warning - The following files in / differ from the boot archive:
/boot/solaris/bootenv.rc
to continue booting .. #svc clear system/boot-archive
and then demand the root password.
2. Randomly, when you do a reboot, a patched machine will claim
that the hardware has changed and demand that you run
kdmconfig. Simply going in and out of kdmconfig, without
changes, does the job. Weird.
3. I went to patch the next machine and after the patch
install and reboot, it was a total brick, with the error
File not executable
Panic : No entry point in kernel/unix
Press any key to reboot
And, naturally, this patch cannot be backed out. For yucks
I tried the equivalent patches on a sparc. No problems. So
I think Sun effed up the GRUB stuff in the kernel patch

Ok ... I noticed that deep down in the README for the patch
they say to do a "reboot -r". Cute. We'll try that.
That seemed to go ok, but when I tried a power cycle, it
wouldn't boot, claiming
SMF database integrity check of /etc/svc/repository.db
failed making me run
/lib/svc/bin/restore_repository
which turned out to be a struggle.
My advice - stay FAR AWAY from this patch. At minumum,
it makes the power up boot process VERY delicate. Wait
for the -32 rev, which I predict will not be long in coming.
Thank you sun.

Bad patch 118844-30

Just wondering if no one else is having issues with the Sun kernel patches?
A month ago we tried to install 118844-28, which failed to install see http://forum.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=28707&tstart=0
Now they release a new kernel patch, which seem to have the exact same problem.
The patch refuses to install saying that patch 117435-02 must be installed first and machine must be rebooted. The 117435-02 patch came with the installation of the OS.
From the prepatch script     #
     # biosdev failed. We can still apply the patch if the rootdisk
     # is the same as the bootdisk
     bootdev=`prtconf -v /devices | sed -n '/boot-device/{n;p;}' | grep pci | cut -f 2 -d \'`
     rootdev=`df -k ${BASEDIR:-/} | nawk 'NR > 1 { print $1 }'`
     if [ -n "$bootdev" ] ; then
          ls -l $rootdev | grep $bootdev > /dev/null
          if [ $? = 0 ]; then
               return 0
          fi
     fiRunning prtconf -v /devices will result in the following (among other things)name='bootpath' type=string items=1
            value='/pci@0,0/pci-ide@7/ide@0/cmdk@0,0:a'
name='bios-boot-device' type=string items=1
            value='80'Since they are still using sed -n '/boot-device/{n;p;}' which will return value='80' this patch will fail to install.

I've been trying to upgrade past 118844-26 for a while. This machine started out as a Solaris 10 x86 1/06 DVD install. I experience errors like you guys have listed here. My favorite so far was this, though:
118844-27
Executing prePatch script...
Once this KU patch is installed and you have rebooted your system,
you will not be able to patchrm this patch safely. Once the NEWBOOT
support is installed, removing it may cause your system to not
be bootable.
Do you wish to continue this installation {yes or no} [yes]?
(by default, installation will continue in 60 seconds)
Checking installed patches...
Executing prepatch script...
Usage: grep -hblcnsviw pattern file . . .
ERROR: One of the following may need to be corrected prior to installing this patch.
ERROR:
ERROR: The boot device may be different from the root device on biteme4.
ERROR: If you have booted from a floppy disk, eject the disk and reboot biteme4 prior
ERROR: to installing this patch.
ERROR: You may have forgotten to reboot biteme4 AFTER installing 117435-02.
ERROR: This configuration requires that 117435-02 be installed first and the
ERROR: system must then be rebooted prior to installing this patch.
The prepatch script exited with return code 1.
Patchadd is terminating.note the usage error on 'grep' ... apparently this patch had its grep arguments not quite sorted :)
I'll try the techniques posted here to see if I can move forward. Thanks for the input on this subject, folks!

Live! SB022x (or any OEM model) owners with driver installation problems ... [Help 'maybe' he

Hi
Problems to get 'drivers'/'driver updates' installed for your Li've! or other SB models on XP or W2k system?
If ctzapxx.exe method didn't work either for you, have you tried 'forced' driver installation yet? If not here is what you can do.
NOTE: THIS METHOD DOES NOT WORK W/ ALL DRIVER PACKAGES, BECAUSE OF THE USED INSTALLER IS NOT THE SAME (ctcomp.dat is not available on those)
. download [url="http://members.aol.com/dvdking200/Pub/ctcomp.exe">this utility[/url]
2. download driver package (or installation ISO/rip) you want to install and extract it to your HD (you can also install Audigy X drivers for your Li've! card if you like)
3. run ctcomp.exe and point it to look from
- ..\Audio\Setup -folder, found as a subfolder in folder you extracted the ISO/rip
- 'main folder' (for. ex. AUD_EAX4DRV_0303) when you're installing driver update (data.cab must exist on that folder)
4. press Patch button
5. install your drivers by running setup.exe located
- at same ..\Audio\Setup -folder when setting up from extracted ISO
- at 'main' folder when you're installing driver update
.jtp
ADDON: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I tested what ctcomp.exe makes to this installation package and here are the results.
INSTALLATION PACKAGE patched: Li'veDrvUni-Pack(ENG)
SUPPORTED CARDS by installer
BEFORE CTCOMP
;SBLi've!
;For CT4670, CT4620, M002/M003, CT4780, CT40, CT4830, CT4832, CT4870, CT4872, CT483, CT487, CT4760, CT4850
[Hardware.Map3]
ID = 00000020, 0000002, 0000002F, 0080022, 0080025, 0080026, 0080027, 0080028, 0080029, 008003, 0080032, 0080040, 0080050
ProductName = Sound Blaster Li've!
;SBLi've! 5.
;For SB0060, SB000, SB002, SB00, SB003, SB005, SB022, SB0222
[Hardware.Map5]
ID = 008006, 0080062, 0080064, 0080069, 008006A, 008006B, 008006C, 0080065
ProductName = Sound Blaster Li've!
AFTER CTCOMP listed only Li've! and older series cards
;SBLi've! 5. : For SB0060, SB000, SB002, SB00, SB003, SB005, SB022, SB0222, SB0228, SB0226, SB0223, SB0229
[Hardware.Map4]
ID = 008006, 0080062, 0080064, 0080069, 008006A, 008006B, 008006C, 0080065, 0080066, 0080067, 00000, 000000A
ProductName = Sound Blaster Li've!
;SBLi've! : For CT4670, CT4620, M002/M003, CT4780, CT40, CT4830, CT4832, CT4870, CT4872, CT483, CT487, CT4760, CT4850
[Hardware.Map4]
ID = 00000020, 0000002, 0000002F, 0080022, 0080025, 0080026, 0080027, 0080028, 0080029, 008003, 0080032, 0080040, 0080050
ProductName = Sound Blaster Li've!
;For SBPCI 52 : CT4790, CT4820, SB050
[Hardware.Map4]
ID = 0080023, 0080050, 008007
ProductName = Sound Blaster PCI52
;For SBPCI 256 : CT4890, CT489, CT4893
[Hardware.Map4]
ID = 008002A, 008002B, 0080033
ProductName = Sound Blaster PCI256
= No SB0220 support available? SO, IS THERE exactly a model numbered as SB0220 AT ALL?
I think there is not.
.jtpMessage Edited by jutapa on 07-04-2006 08:6 AM

The reason i said this should be a sticky is that these boards move so fast that its impossiable for new comers to keep up with threads that have AWESOME tips that may or may not help but how many of us have accually gone through every post in the last 60 days to try and find a fix? I know I have not, but in the end you need to try everything you can.
Something like this is not on the Creative FAQ data base so the only people to know about this possiable fix are the few who catch it in time.
In my experience there is ALWAYS more than way to do things and 0 ways to get it to work with 20 other methods to run it. Thats a lot of ways to do the one thing. So unless we have a huge data base with every possiable fix,method or forceiable way to do something then more and more people will get really upset that Creative offer no help.
Take the way Creative say to un-install drivers, man, this for the most part never works, so something like this may be the only way to get it to work for some people.
What I do is though, I copy a thread like this one and will pass it on to others if need be. Ofcause with all credit to the original poster and I never pass it off as my fix and/work.
I I like to cover every possiable aspect to do something. Ya know what i mean

Driver e1000g problem - patch 118844-30

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for