DSCC access is slow

I have installed native 6.2 version of DS. I have configured MMR between two server and in the test environment. I also have installed the DSCC on both servers.
My question is, I observed the DSCC acces through the browser is slower than the previous version of console. is there any tuning required to respond faster?

The only way is to run in on a server with enough resources (especially RAM).
More it is of tomcat/application server customization than the DSCC itself.
Have in mind that DSCC should not be used for data management (my opinion).
DSCC should be used/may for configuration of your ldap services. It's not a daily procedure
after your tree is in a stable/working position.
There are nice tools out there (plus the command line tools) to manage
your data.
Giannis

Similar Messages

Drive access impossibly slow... Even though target disk!

Drive access on our MacBook Pro is suddenly impossibly slow - taking five, ten minutes to startup, and being unable to complete an install (Java update). I found no errors in disk repair and just 'ignorable' errors in permissions. Programs crashing or haltling - even Finder and Force Quit aren't coming up.
Plugged it into my white MacBook to run Drive Genius to see if the drive could be salvaged, and disk access is slow even this way. Crazy slow, like taking several minutes just to get the drive information.
Size: 499.25 GB (464.96 GiB, 499,248,103,424 bytes)
Formatted As: Mac OS Extended (Journaled)
Volume Block Count: 121,886,744
Volume Block Size: 4,096 bytes
Volume Size: 499.25 GB (464.96 GiB, 499,248,103,424 bytes)
Journal: Enabled
Used: 259.67 GB (241.83 GiB, 259,666,432,000 bytes), 52.01%
So it seems normal, just really, exceedingly, impossibly slow.
What are the possible solutions? I'm not entirely certain it's just the drive; one of the USB ports on the computer is randomly non functioning, no software indications.
-Crissa

Using the online hardware test tool (Boot using Option+D) I was able to discern that the operaitng system had decided the drive was bad without actually telling me it was bad. Eventually the drive completely failed.
While it was slow, I had backed everything up. I found a guide to replacing the HD, although I did not actually need the fancy screwdriver to put the drive back in. It was very simple!
The USB issue still comes and goes, though.
-Crissa

Serial port access time slows in version 6 to 7 upgrade

Hi - I am in the process of upgrading an project from LV 6 to LV
7, the serial port access works well in LV6 but after the
upgrade, the serial port access is slow in LV if the application is
compiled into an exe. We are running Windows 2K on all machines
and have installed the LV7.0 runtime engine on the PC that is running
the executable. If I run the application on a machine that has
the full LV7.0 development software on it, the executable runs
just like it used to under LV6.0
What am I forgetting?? The application is built into one exe that
has all of the sub vi's included. I have checked the box on the
application builder that says included serial port support.
Help! - We have 3000 PCBs sitting in manufacturing waiting to go to test until I solve this problem
Thank you

Hi
I just recently finished a project in which I had to upgrade code from LV 6 to LV 7.1. After I did that the serial port actually worked but all the Fieldpoint devices that were connected to the system didn't work. The problem ultimately was the NI Fieldpoint Drivers. After I installed the newest drivers from NI everything worked perfectly. I don't know why your problem is occurring, but I wanted to reasure you that there isn't a problem with the serial ports when upgrading to LV7.1 (I don't know about LV7).BTW, I had LV6.1 development system installed on the computer, but didn't have the LV7.1 (All I had was an EXE file).
So, try installing the newest drivers. Maybe that can help.
Ami

Windows 2003 server access getting slow from Windows7/8 client

We have Windows 2003 Enterprise Server. If I try to access through Windows 7 or Windows 8 client PC then I am getting very slow access. Slow access in terms of, if I am taking remote desktop of server [OR] if I directly browse server directory [OR] even
accessing any web application on server it is very slow.
But if I am accessing though any Windows-XP base client or even other servers having Windows 2003 or Windows 2008 then access in good.
But interesting thing is even we have other Windows 2003 server for which I am getting normal response.
Can someone guide me on the same? I am not able to understand the root cause of it.
-Abhay

Start with decreasing SMB version in clients. For inspiration look here
http://www.petri.co.il/how-to-disable-smb-2-on-windows-vista-or-server-2008.htm
Rgds
Milos

Disk access extremely slow after 10.5.2 Update

I did the update to 10.5.2 today.
1. I tried to update via Software Update. The update started but then stopped with an Error message (Contact Support) and the system freezed. There was just the spinning wheel on blue background for more than one hour. No more harddisk activity. I finally rebooted (hard way). After a reboot I had a somehow upgraded system. But many things did not work anymore (most applications crashed, mail could not access keychain items anymore, etcpp)
2. Then I downloaded the complete Update package to do a manual update (happily firefox still worked). After a manual install it worked. It installed fine and rebooted. Now everything works as it should with the only problem that everything is extremly slow. Starting an application lasts about double the time as normal, loading files takes 3 to 4 times more time than with 10.5.1
To fix these issues I tried several things:
- Fixed permissions
- Cleared all cache files and forced system to rebuild them
- Severall reboots
- Waited until backup completed and Spotlight index was rebuilt
Bootup time is now fine (more or less). Just a little slower than 10.5.1. Application start is still slow but better. But the file access is still extremly slow. This can be observed very well in Parallels which still works fine, but needs 3 to 4 times longer to start (so do all applications within parallels). I checked CPU (Activity Monitor) but could not see anything special.
Any ideas what could be the reason for this behaviour and (more important) how to possibly fix this? I'm thinking about going back to 10.5.1 with time-machine and then try it again with the package install.
Any help/ideas would be appreciated.

Is it slow wireless LAN behavior affecting Time Machine? Check out the third page of this thread, specificallly the post by John Albergo about "delay_ack."
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1394485&start=30&tstart=0
It helped me a lot.

Finder/Disk Access Extremely Slow

I have a G4 867 (MDD) running OS 10.4.6. After putting my computer to sleep last night, I woke up this morning to find hanging at the login-from-sleep screen. I force-restarted, and since that point the computer, and especially some components of the Finder, has been running EXTREMELY slow.
Symptoms:
-Hard drives are slow to appear (I have two on the primary channel and two on the secondary). They will eventually show up, but it can take over a minute for drives other than the startup drive. When I scan them with Disk Utility, they appear fine.
-Using menus and accessing files in the Finder can take upwards of a minute or so. Likewise, switching between programs can induce waits of about 30 seconds.
-Curiously, once inside a program (say, Safari or iTunes), no problems exist local to the program, and it can run nearly unaffected... but if I need to change applications or access a file outside the program, the problems surface.
Things I've tried:
-Restarting.
-Trashing my Finder prefs.
-Zapping the PRAM.
-Resetting the PMU.
-Running Disk Utility.
-Running Yasu.
-Reinstalling the 10.4.6 Update.
-Trying to reinstall Tiger (which failed; initially, the DVD couldn't see the drives- then, after I checked them with Disk Utility, it could see them but failed to install after checking the DVD and asked me to restart)
Can anyone help?
G4 Dual 867 (Mirrored Drive Doors) Mac OS X (10.4.6) 2 GB RAM, ATI Radeon 9800 Pro AGP

I got my AE and Seagate FreeAgent Pro hard drive
yesturday and I have the exact same problem.
If I hook up the drive to the computer directly it is
very very fast.
If I hook it up to the AE it takes about 2 hours to
move a couple fils totaling 2 gigs over ETHERNET!
If I transfer the same files over the same network
between 2 computers the speed is much much faster.
Is this normal or some nasty firmware bug. It almost
feels like the AE is using USB 1.0 for some reason.
You guys are funny. How about checking out the specs of USB 2.0 and 802.11g/n?
Go here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/802.11g#802.11g
and here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_2.0
Firewire vs. USB tests are here:
http://www.g4tv.com/techtvvault/features/39129/USB20_Versus_FireWirepg3.html
802.11g:
Release Date Op. Frequency Data Rate (Typ) Data Rate (Max) Range (Indoor)
June 2003 2.4 GHz 19 Mbit/s 54 Mbit/s ~35 meters
802.11n:
Release Date Op. Frequency Data Rate (Typ) Data Rate (Max) Range (Indoor)
Mid 2008 5 GHz and/or 2.4 GHz 74 Mbit/s 248 Mbit/s (2 stream) ~70 meters
Bottom line: 802.11n typical is 74Mbps, 802.11g typical is 19Mbps. USB 2.0 typical is 50Mbps.
On the average, you should expect your speed to drop by over 50% when connecting the USB drive to AESB using an 802.11g device. If your device is 802.11n, then you should have pretty much similar performance.
Now, if you increase the distance from your base station, or you put walls in between, the performance of 802.11g will go down "dramatically", all the way to 2-3Mbps, easy. Not so for 802.11n, which behaves much better at longer distances.

Eveything involving disk access is slow

Why is everything to do with HD access seems to be slow, very painfully slow!!
Due to a failed RAID I got a new 500gb Seagate SATA HD drive to install internally.
I have been tiding files up and using 'Archive' a lot and it takes an age to do anything. It seems the size of the Archive is directly proportional to the performance. I have a 63gb folder to Archive and at 12.36gb it is now managing a stellar .01 gb a second, with 4 hours to completion!!
Activity Monitor is only reporting:
Data read/sec 10.58mb
Data written/sec 10.00mb
The best snapshot!@
And is very bad!!
I moved 54gb of Aperture images from my old external FW400 RAID onto a new 500gb internal SATA drive with no real visible performance gain.
Anyone got any hints at what maybe the problem? I don't think its a hardware issue but an OS X issue.
I know Seagate are not the fastest HD on the market but they were the cheapest. I also know cheaper is not the best but a SATA disk on a MacPro should produce much better performance than I am getting.

Hi Pedro,
I'm having the exact same issue as you, whilst transfering files using finder to the Time Capsule or a USB drive attached to the Time Capsule it used to be quick really quick specially via Ethernet connection, after upgrading to Lion the speed is appaling and it can come to a stand still. I have a 100gb iTunes collection on the disk that used to work fine with Snow Leopard now I can't access it. Same goes for the multiple iPhoto collections I have there.
I have tried to format USB drive and Time Capsule HD as well it did not help. Sometimes the transfers can take ages other times they just stop and Finder can be seen on activity monitor as being hanged.
To rule out a problem with the Time Capsule I connected the Mac at work to a windows network I logged in and presto! All network transfers were bad in terms of speed, really bad!
Decided to re-install Lion from scratch but alas the problem is still there.... appareltly Lion 10.7.1 is coming quicker than previously thought....

USB Disk access "Extremely" Slow

I am unable to use my network disk essentially because the disk access write/read times are SO SLOW...I am better off running backups by connecting my disk directly to the compter. Does anyone else have this problem?
It took 5 Minutes to read my Music directory; connected directly via the same cable it takes seconds.
What gives?
Any help would be appreciated.

I got my AE and Seagate FreeAgent Pro hard drive
yesturday and I have the exact same problem.
If I hook up the drive to the computer directly it is
very very fast.
If I hook it up to the AE it takes about 2 hours to
move a couple fils totaling 2 gigs over ETHERNET!
If I transfer the same files over the same network
between 2 computers the speed is much much faster.
Is this normal or some nasty firmware bug. It almost
feels like the AE is using USB 1.0 for some reason.
You guys are funny. How about checking out the specs of USB 2.0 and 802.11g/n?
Go here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/802.11g#802.11g
and here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_2.0
Firewire vs. USB tests are here:
http://www.g4tv.com/techtvvault/features/39129/USB20_Versus_FireWirepg3.html
802.11g:
Release Date Op. Frequency Data Rate (Typ) Data Rate (Max) Range (Indoor)
June 2003 2.4 GHz 19 Mbit/s 54 Mbit/s ~35 meters
802.11n:
Release Date Op. Frequency Data Rate (Typ) Data Rate (Max) Range (Indoor)
Mid 2008 5 GHz and/or 2.4 GHz 74 Mbit/s 248 Mbit/s (2 stream) ~70 meters
Bottom line: 802.11n typical is 74Mbps, 802.11g typical is 19Mbps. USB 2.0 typical is 50Mbps.
On the average, you should expect your speed to drop by over 50% when connecting the USB drive to AESB using an 802.11g device. If your device is 802.11n, then you should have pretty much similar performance.
Now, if you increase the distance from your base station, or you put walls in between, the performance of 802.11g will go down "dramatically", all the way to 2-3Mbps, easy. Not so for 802.11n, which behaves much better at longer distances.

Time Capsule access is slow

I started this on a separate thread, 'cause my problem seems to differ a bit from most reported here.
After updating to Lion, I noticed that file transfers to the Time Capsule disk are much slower. I'm not talking about Time Machine backups as most people have noticed (these, believe it or not, have now gone back to normal speeds after the first slow backups), but manually transferring a file onto the disk. It takes me around 15 minutes to transfer a 100MB file - and the progress bar is highly irregular! These slow speeds happen both via Ethernet or via wifi...
Really not sure what my options could be on this one. It takes longer to transfer a file to my TC disk connected via Ethernet than to transfer it to another Mac on the same network via wifi! My other Macs (Snow Leopard machines) on the network can access the Time Capsule disk at normal speeds, even via wifi!
Thanks for any input on this!

Hi Pedro,
I'm having the exact same issue as you, whilst transfering files using finder to the Time Capsule or a USB drive attached to the Time Capsule it used to be quick really quick specially via Ethernet connection, after upgrading to Lion the speed is appaling and it can come to a stand still. I have a 100gb iTunes collection on the disk that used to work fine with Snow Leopard now I can't access it. Same goes for the multiple iPhoto collections I have there.
I have tried to format USB drive and Time Capsule HD as well it did not help. Sometimes the transfers can take ages other times they just stop and Finder can be seen on activity monitor as being hanged.
To rule out a problem with the Time Capsule I connected the Mac at work to a windows network I logged in and presto! All network transfers were bad in terms of speed, really bad!
Decided to re-install Lion from scratch but alas the problem is still there.... appareltly Lion 10.7.1 is coming quicker than previously thought....

Outlook 2010/13 Laptop Calendar access extremely slow after opening shared calendar

I have a problem with several laptops running Win 7 Ultimate on a network running SBS 2008 (Exch 2007) when they are on the internal network. Outlook response is fine until they tick any shared calendar (either shared by the user or with full access
to the mailbox granted at the server level)- the response of the calendar screen for the
local users calendar or the shared calendar
when using the advance or retreat arrows on the weeks drops down to roughly 20 seconds to advance to the next week, if the shared calendar is then unticked the speed stays slow for accessing the local calendar. if the user exits outlook and restarts
it the speed for accessing their own calendar returns to normal until they open another shared calendar.
this is a problem that has started within the last couple of months. SP are up to date on the windows and office.
I have tried ticking the download shared folders on and off, and also switching to using HTTP instead of TCPIP through the outlook anywhere. they run in cached mode as they are laptops- uncached is not an option
network access is fine
The problem affects some users on the network but not others. the problem shows on office 2010 and 2013. they don't appear to have the problem when they are out of the office.
Any thoughts anyone?

If you run your profile in Exchange cache mode and enable "Download share folders", please try to run SCANPST file to fix the OST/PST file and check the result.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/287497/en-us
By the way, does it for all shared calendr when you go to access them?
Tony Chen
TechNet Community Support

Cat 4006 S3 - Attached hosts Net access very slow prior to reboot

I have a CAT 4006 sup III running 12.1(11b)EW1 with a number of servers attached. Users started having problems accessing servers. After investigating all the impacted servers were connected to the same switch. The switch was appeared to be operating normally. Show proc cpu, show proc mem, show logging, and ping tests all normal. Warm booted switch and asics on sup failed bootup diag. Cold boot of the switch got it back up and running. Cisco Tac reviewed the post problem sh tech with no findings.
Any ideas?

No L2 loops and it was a hopefully isolated incident. We have to switches that are identical in hardware and IOS and only one was impacted.
clients of systems attached to the switch would have intermittently slow or non existent access to the host systems. Problems included saving files on network drives, email down, very slow or failed logins, application launches were slow or failed.
No messages were showing up in the switch log, let alone messages referred in the tech note. We have had asic issues on line cards in the past. Those instances were on different switches and created volumes of errors.
Layer 2 seemed fine. Pings were worked without fail. Console broadcast messages from host systems on the impacted switches made it out to clients.
Keep thinking it wasn't a switch problem but the reboot did fix the issue.
I will be replacing the sup card and doing a IOS upgrade this weekend.

Accessibility's "Slow Keys" always turns on on its own [SOLVED](kinda)

The "Slow Keys" feature always turns on randomly when I for example just try to mark something with the mouse, holding down the shift key, this is on XFCE4.
In Applications Menu -> Accessories -> Accessiblity I already unchecked ALL boxes to try and disable it, but it doesn't work. What's more, when it turns on again (I notice this because it gives a little popup message) it's even still shown as "disabled" (ie check box is unchecked) in the AM->Acc->Acc config dialogue! I have to actually click it twice there (check + uncheck again) to disable it.
I tried to just uninstall 'atk' which seemed to provide Accessibility, but that didn't work out because gtk2/gtk3 depended on it.
Help please, how can I get rid of SlowKeys popping up once and for all?
Last edited by Jindur (2012-06-07 11:15:43)

Interesting, I actually do use gdm for logging in.
When I set up my Arch system I wanted to not install any gnome/kde stuff but only xfce, however, if I didn't use gdm for login manager but Slim (I think it was called, I followed the instructions on the archlinux page for that one actually) then I wouldn't have any sound in my xfce session. I was unable to find out why, alsamixer and everything seemed completely fine, yet there was not a single sound coming out, so I just went with gdm which seemed to do something magic to audio (or maybe Slim did something anti-magic).
I just searched in /etc for "accessibility" and got several results in these files:
1) /etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/%gconf-tree.xml
2) /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/00-upstream-settings
3) /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/locks/00-upstream-settings-locks
as well as these two whose filenames seem unlikely to be involved in the problem:
4) /etc/xdg/menus/xfce-applications.menu
5) /etc/xdg/menus/arch-applications.menu
1) only seems to contain a menu structure in XML format, although it also has an entry "exec_ats" under "accessibility"->"startup"..
2) contains this:
[org/gnome/desktop/interface]
toolkit-accessibility=true
3) this, but since it's apparently a "lock" file, I guess it is just created from 2)?:
/org/gnome/desktop/interface/toolkit-accessibility
4) and 5) are XML menu structures again, which just mention "xfce-accessories.directory" and "Arch-Accessibility.directory". Seem unlikely to be a cause I guess.
I tried setting 2) to =false and commenting out the line in 3) but it didn't help.
I noticed however, that it seemed to take 10s rather than just 6s until slowkeys triggered, but might just be my nerves .
Last edited by Jindur (2012-06-07 10:44:16)

Windows File access very slow......

Hi !
I´m working with a DP800 Quicksilver, with OS-X 10.4.5.
(1,5 Gig Ram, 500 Gig Hitachi ATA 66 HD)
Via ftp, I got transfer rates (up-and download) Quicksilver
to my linux-samba-machine of 10 MegaBytes / second !
Via CIFS (OS-X Network environment),
to the same samba machine only 50 KBytes /second....
(windows xp, 2000, 98 AND the same mac (old harddisc,with os9.2+ thusby Dave) works with 3-5 Megabytes / second.
So what´s wrong with the filesharing under OS-X ?
(DNS Name resolution, ping etc. everything works fine)
thank you for any comments,
with compliments
martin
Quicksilver DP800 Mac OS X (10.4.5)

Hi,
Whether the issue occurs on using all systems (Windows 7/8/server) or only specific systems? Please test to access the same share folder on different computers to see the result.
Also try to install the following hotfix on that server to see the result. If client systems are Windows 8/8.1/2012/2012 R2, install this hotfix as well.
Transferring files by using SMB2 or SMB3 causes memory leak on a Windows computer
https://support2.microsoft.com/kb/2928360/en-us
Also here is an article for troubleshooting such network related issue:
[Forum FAQ] Troubleshooting Network File Copy Slowness
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/1023eab5-d609-485b-930e-db5a9352e420/forum-faq-troubleshooting-network-file-copy-slowness?forum=winservergen
First of all pelase try "1.2 Check, Enable and Disable SMB Versions in Windows operating systems" - disable SMB2/3 to see if issue persists in SMB1. This is just for testing and you can re-enable after testing.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Windows Server 2012 R2 RDP access too slow when user access

HI Team,
Recently installed Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard edition .
The above server also promoted as Domain controller.
I am trying to access the server VIA RDP from Windows 8 client machine access is toll slow and welcome screen shows for 2 to 3 minutes then only i can able to see my server desktop.
Please advise me.

We have two applications published on Rdweb.
1. MS
Paint
2. Remote
Desktop with option /v: <fqdn of the terminal server itself>
MS Paint – can see local drives when logged on to the paint application
Remote Desktop with parameters /v: <fqdn of the terminal server itself> - cannot see local drives when logged onto the full desktop view
Mahesh

Constant Limited access and slow speed on BT Infin...

Hi all,
Just joined BT from AOL due to bad customer service and a rubbish service (did me good for previous 10+ years though)
Anyhow, just got BT infinity Option 1 installed on Friday the 17th and on that day it was perfect.
Everyday since the engineer visited i am getting limited internet access every so often and slow broadband.
Makes AOL seem super fast
Say i have 5 full signal bars on my laptop, i will click a webpage. The page will come up as Internet explorer cannot open the page. There is then a warning sign on my signal bars!
I refresh the page and it comes up Fine.... nearly every time.
But all this takes a while.
Im sure i read for the first 3 days the broadband can be slow?
Cant deal with this if its gonna happen all the time!!
All help appreciated. Anyone with the same problem??
BT said they are monitoring the line for 24hrs.
Thanks

He carnt run a speed test, if hes getting the dreaded limited service on his wirless bars on his laptop it will not connect to the internet. Have you gone over your usage allowance or something?. It not it is definate a signal wirless problem. I used to get it sometimes back on business broadband on ADSL but it just used to go off when I reset the laptop and turned it back on again. Might be different with you though!.
Please click on pink star to the left and say thanks if I have helped you at all!. Thank you. Home Hub Page- http://bthomehub.home/
BT Speed test- http://www.speedtest.btwholesale.com/
Speedtest:-http://diagnostics.bt.com/login/?workflow=Speed
Net Connect test- http://netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/index.html

DSCC access is slow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for