DSL contract changes not possible since FIOS is available?

I've been a Verizon DSL customer for 4-5 years. Only the 1.5Mbps is available to us. FIOS became available shortly after I signed for DSL. For the past year (or 2?), I've been considering moving out of state, as a result, I've been on the monthly plan (~$39/month). Yesterday I called Verizon because I wanted to see what the current DSL prices were (768Kbps service and the yearly price for the 1.5Mbps service) and if maybe the 3Mbps service had become available. To my surprise, I was told that I could not make any change to my DSL service since FIOS was available..... Now, I would love to need FIOS, but I can not justify the price for that cool toy when I don't even benefit from/use in full the 1.5Mbps DSL service....
Is this everybody's experience? Is that a new move for Verizon to try to pay for the fiber optic infrastructure they laid down? I mean, this is not something I asked them to do.... I'd rather have them go with faster DSL speed instead of fiber (that's what they have in other countries, ADSL 20 or 30Mbps) rather than not provide me a choice.... I've been a loyal customer and feel cheated. As much as I hate it, I'll have to look at what the cable company now offers since every dollar spent counts.
I'm probably a bad customer for all players involved (cheapest phone service, cheapest TV service, not cheapest DSL service).

When I moved in Auguest I had no problem getting the current DSL at my new place. I flat out told them if they said I had to have FIOS I would go to Comcast. Maybe you got someone new or something. I would try again. If you don't get the answer you want talk to a supervisor and if you still don't get the answer you want they have a line for people who have been unable to resolve issues through those normal channels. It is in the phone book. I have used it before. Good luck. I hope you are able to work it out.

Similar Messages

Document being distributed no changes not possible and btadminh could not be locked

Hi All,
I am getting ERROR: "document being distributed no changes not possible" & WARNING:"BTadminH could not be locked" in CRM WEBUI while trying to edit the order.
I checked all the BDOCs and smq1, smq2 ,smw01 here are no queues stuck here.
I also run distribution check FM, whenever i run it will be unlocked and able to edit. but this is not the solution for me because this error and warning getting to every new order (transaction) .
thanks,
Vinnu.

Hi,
Check the initial status settings, there should not be any distribution lock maintained.
Award point if it is helpful
Regards,
D Singh

Release orders against contract 4600000069 not possible (contract not relea

Hai,
I had created a contract and had a release procedure for it.
I had released the contract using ME35k.
When i try to raise a p.o agaist the contract i am getting the error as "Release orders against contract 4600000069 not possible (contract not released)"
What could be the problem and solution for the above error message.
Thanks
Hari.

Bijay Kumar Barik wrote:
Hi,
>
> Error clearly says, contract not released. Release order can be created against contract ,if contract is released.Check=> you may used ME35K to release the contract , but after releasing with releases code, you have not saved the release .Just do use again ME35K to release the contract with release code & save.
>
> NOTE:
> Also check how many levels of release is there for contract and check all levels of release with respective release codes is done or not before creating release order WRT contract.
>
> Regards,
> Biju K
I had released and saved for all the levels i.e for all the release codes.
Still it is behaving the same.
I have not used any ref purchase org as mentioned above in one of replies.

Changing not possible; field is read-only

Hello,
I need update Expected Value in Opportunity.
Expected Value is bound Opportunity.SalesForecast.ExpectedRevenueAmount.content.
When I try to update in adsl, "Changing not possible; field is read-only" error appears in frontend to the user.
Thanks!

Hi Rodrigo Mathias,Not an answer to your post just to share my problem
Seems Opportunity has a lot of problems. As in my case i am trying to code in BeforeSave method that when ever the opportunity gets create by code i have to poppulate my CUSTOM Invonved Party ( i have created custom party role ).
And i have passed partykey.partyId.content and RoleCode but when i click on save it gives me the error about Role Category!
now when debugged that all Parties ( i debugged and checked whole collection) had the Role category every party from that collection had the Role category associated!
So i tried to add r
ole category by code! but that is also public write access set as FALSE!
So finally i again opened the book for clod , and a line is specificaly written that PartyID node will not be used after 1402 there will be separate node PartyNAme where u can pass partyid , name or email!
but unfortunately that is also not available in the opportunity BO!
So i am also kind of stuck!
Btw one thing i would like to mention is when u try to maintain your custom role in opportunity manually it works and data gets saved!
Regards,
Dhruvin

SRM 7 Contract Distribution not possible in PPS - is it true ?

Hi SRM Gurus,
I gather that the SRM 7.0 Central Contract are not distributed to ECC 6.04 in PPS environment.
( Ours is SRM 7.0 ECC 6.0 Enhp 4 with PI 7.11 on PPS - ECS.)
Correct me if i am wrong.
If so, is there any other way to distribute Central Contract to ECC . Even it its partial distribution.
Thogh, I hv config for CCTR following the SNote 1268821. To start the problem, the Distribution button on the header of the contract is disabled. CCTR tran type configured both in SRM and ECC.
Kindly share your thoughts.

Hello,
You can try reverting the note 1354971, to get an assign distribution button active at item level.
Interfaces(XML) which are used to transfered the central contract are not extended to all the fields related to PPS functionality. Eg. Guaranteed Minimum.
These fields will not be transfered to backend and other process like release value updation to the backend contract has limitation as PPS funcalities can be used only in extended classic scenario.
So we have a limitation and also this functionality will not be supported in PPS.
Nevertheless, you can enable this funcationality and use with the limitation.
You will have to handle this through custom meta data handle where you need to create dynamic class and method and maitain in the customizing table /SAPSRM/V_MDA_HC. You can enable the Assign distribution button and link in the dynamic class.
You can check the configuration in the standard meta table /SAPSRM/V_MDA_HD for reference.
Courtesy : Lisa Norris!
Re: SRM 7 Contract Distribution not possible in PPS

Roll-up not possible; no filled aggregates available

hi sapgurus,
I am facing the following while running my process chains:
Roll-up not possible; no filled aggregates available
Rollup is ended with error;
My problem i don't have sufficient authorization to cube to do the manual roll
Please help me,and how to proceed with this error.

ashwin,
Thanks for your reply.
Though i am not able to see the data in cube,i am able to see the aggregates in the cube by clicking on aggregates button on right side of the cube.
I observed that button "filled/switched off" is red should i activate them .How to do that?.
Please help me with this?.
thanks in advance.
Message was edited by:
NRUPAL CHOWDARY

SRM 7 Contract Distribution not possible in PPS

Hi all,
We're on SRM 7 / ECC6 EHP3, and activated PPS. I have been told that for PPS the distribution is not supported completely, and hence the functionality is disabled, NOTE 1354971.
My problem is, since we have activated the PPS functionality in all the landscapes we have at present. I can not switch PPS off or refer to another system without the PPS. By reverting the note 1354971, i have only managed to get an assign distribution button active at item level. I would have assumed, the contract/GOA should be able to be distributed at header level. Consider a contract with 1000 items.
Can please someone tell me what is the process for distributing a contract completely. Not just selective items.
Moreover, this does not work, when i have outline items/sub items in the contract.
Regards
Ali

Dear Ali,
Interfaces(XML) which are used to transfered the central contract are not extended to all the fields related to PPS functionality. Eg. Guaranteed Minimum.
These fields will not be transfered to backend and other process like release value updation to the backend contract has limitation as PPS funcalities can be used only in extended classic scenario.
So we have a limitation and also this functionality will not be supported in PPS.
As it was a bug , we have corrected this through the note 1354971.
Nevertheless, you can enable this funcationality and use with the limitation.
You will have to handle this through custom meta data handle where you need to create dynamic class and method and maitain in the customizing table /SAPSRM/V_MDA_HC. You can enable the Assign distribution button and link in the dynamic class.
You can check the configuration in the standard meta table /SAPSRM/V_MDA_HD for reference.
I hope this helps,
Kind Regards,
Lisa

MR21 price change not possible

Dear pal,
I have a material code X with valuation type RM_IND
In material master accounting view1- Price determination is 3 with price control S.There is some stock of material with some value.
I am trying to change the price in MR21.
System prevents me from proceeding price change for X RM_IND not possible.
There are pending PRs and POs.
How to go about ?
thanks
v balajee

Hi
Standard price u hv selected for ur material. This can be changed in MM02 iteself.
Regards,
Raman

Release orders against contract 4600000002 not possible (contract not relea

hi all,
Am trying to create a blanket po from a contract. but obviously, the release strategy i set up for po release has affected the contract created and hence gives the error above.
how can i over come this challenge please?

Dear,
Please check contract release status in ME33K, header - Release strategy. Check all released contract or not. If not do relase with ME35K.
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

ChaRM: Normal Change - Not possible to set "Successfully Tested" unless the Maint. Cycle is set to "In Development with Release"

Hello,
I'm doing some tests with ChaRM, Normal Change scenario.
As far as I know, the following steps would be the correct sequence (concerning development and test phases only):
1) Developers perform the correction in DEV and release their TASKS of the transport request
2) Developer Lead set the Normal Change document status to "to be tested"
3) In background, a Transport of Copies is created with all data previously stored in the original transport request. Then this ToC is transported into QAS
4) Change Manager set the Maintenance Cycle status to "Test"
5) Tester performs the test into QAS
6) Tester provides a valuable feedback and set Normal Change document status to "tested successfully"
According to the following SAP Portal article, it seems to be correct:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm71_sp10/helpdata/en/48/db938dceba518de10000000a42189c/frameset.htm
During my tests, however, I have noticed that it is just possible to go from step 5 to 6 if the Maintenance Cycle status is set to "In Development with Release" (go a step back in the Cycle). Otherwise, I get the following error messages:
Warning Message Details Status was reset by system
Warning Message Details Action RELEASE_ALL cannot be performed during this maintenance phase
Warning Message Next status cannot be set because some actions cannot be executed.
Once I have done the Cycle status change, then it is possible to move from 5 to 6 without errors and then the original transport request is transported into QAS too.
Question: Is this the correct behavior or am I missing customizing?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Daniel

Hello Vivek,
Thanks for your reply.
It is kinda weird the steps sequence, since the Tester needs to tell the Change Manager to move the cycle's status before approving the correction done in QAS (successfully tested).
Perhaps a new action between "to be tested" and "successfully tested" could exist, in order to request the CM to perform the cycle update.
But OK, that's how it is.
Regards,
Daniel

Sale order plant change not possible

dear sir,
we have set valuation level is a plant in OX14. we have two production plants 1010 and 1020
we are using variant configuraion also.
we are unable to change the plant from one plant (1010) to (1020) other in sale order VA02 if we have
1) ProForma-Order
2) Order BOM
3) Cost run
Retaining above things how can we change the plant in sale order
please give some details to solve this problem
thanks and regards,
srinivas

Hi
Guess the changes are not saved. Could you see the changes recorded in the sales order - change log (Menu-Environment-Changes).
Please check again which plant is there in that particular sales order item.
Thanks,
Ravi

Material description change not possible after MM12 &MM13

After unicode & patch upgrade , i am not able to change material description in BAsic DATA1 of material master .This changes are done by running MM12 & MM13 tCode. Can anubody help me why i am not able to change material description of material after running MM12 & MM13

Hi,
MM12 & MM13 are scheduled changes it will not change immediately , Pl.s scheduled the materials with proper chnages then check the changes after schedule date .
Could you explan me why you are using these codes for Description changes ? is there any specific requirement
Thanks
sekhar

Sharing external drive not possible since 10.8

Hi,
I have an usb-device attached to my imac (mac os x journaled and a fat32 usb-stick). There are the normal entries under /Volumes/*.
Before my upgrade to 10.8, I could just mount that drive via network other macs (10.6 + 10.7) like usershome or public folders.
In 10.8 everything appears (Macintosh HD, user-home, public folders and any other folder I share) except these external drives or any folder I share on these drives.
I log on to the imac via my apple-id (seems to be new in 10.8?).
Any idea what changed? Or how to fix that?
Thanks

So there seems to be a technical Bug:
If I share the drive as smb-Device, I can connect to it but don't have any content.
Konsole displays
26.08.12 08:21:13,000 kernel[0]: disk2s2: 0xc005 (UNDEFINED).
disk2s2 is my partition on my external drive.

Open Items exist.. Not possible to change parameters ??

Hi all,
I made some X account balance to zero. And now when I was trying to change the account as open item (prior not in open item mgmt), system says that 'Account balance is 0, but still open items exist. Change not possible'. What does that mean ?
Suresh

Hi,
Once transaction data is posted, GL Account cannot be made into an open item managed account. However, you can consider the following options:
1. GL Account Balance is ZERO: If the GL Account balance is ZERO, the GL Master record can be changed to Open Item managed Account or vice versa. But this will not change the transaction data already posted. Only future transaction data will be open item managed.
2. Until SAP version 4.0B SAP has provided a program to convert a GL Account to open item managed account after transaction data is posted (or vice versa). You can execute this program by blocking the GL Account and this will make the required changes in tables and also change GL Master record.
But this program is not available for execution in higher versions. Hence, you can copy the program into a Z Program and execute it. The name of the standard program is RFSEPA02.
Thanks
Murali.

CJN1 (Revaluation at actual prices not possible in version 0, fiscal 2008)

Hi All,
I got error message in tcode CJN1
Revaluation at actual prices not possible in version 0, fiscal year 2008
Message no. KI760
Diagnosis
A revaluation for actual prices is not possible since this function is not available in version 0 in fiscal year 2008.
Procedure
Maintain the corresponding indicator in your version.
What should i do?
Cheers,
Nies

You have to check in customizing Project System > Costs > Create CO version the correct settings for Fiscal Year 2008.
Ciao
Giorgio

DSL contract changes not possible since FIOS is available?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for