DSL performing very poorly...

Over the last month or so, my DSL connection has become increasingly unpredictable, with the modem's Internet light going out/turning red, stopping downloads dead in their tracks; waiting to get back online, etc. Having read suggestions in the Forum, here is some of the info needed, if anyone can help, please let me know. Thanks!:
Modem: Westell model F90-610015-06, rev. H, made 10/2008.
Transceiver Statistics
Transceiver Revision: 7.2.3.0
Vendor ID Code: 4
Line Mode: ADSL2+ Mode
Data Path: Interleaved
Transceiver Information Downstream Path Upstream Path
DSL Speed (Kbits/Sec) 1179 447
Margin (dB) 11.5 23.0
Line Attenuation (dB) 57.0 34.5
Transmit Power (dBm) 17.1 11.9
All Entries
CURRENT MODEM STATUS
DSL Modem Status....... Up
PPP Session Status...... Up
Connection Type......... PPPoE
Time set from............. Local
Time since last boot.... 0 days, 6 hrs: 2 mins: 36 secs
EVENTS
Events are listed starting from the most recent.
SAT APR 30 13:15:33 2011
External content downloaded
SAT APR 30 12:31:22 2011
CWMP: Final Http Return Code = 204
SAT APR 30 12:31:22 2011
CWMP: Inform (200). The following events are true: 4 VALUE CHANGE
SAT APR 30 12:31:22 2011
CWMP: TCP Connected, SSL Connection Succeeded, Auth Type = Basic
SAT APR 30 12:31:21 2011
CWMP: Inform (401). The following events are true: 4 VALUE CHANGE
SAT APR 30 12:31:21 2011
CWMP: TCP Connected, SSL Connection Succeeded, Auth Type = Basic
SAT APR 30 12:30:53 2011
Setting System clock to Local time SAT APR 30 12:30:53 2011
SAT APR 30 12:30:53 2011
Time set from Primary SNTP server: tock.usno.navy.mil
SAT APR 30 12:30:51 2011
PPP CONNECTED on VPI 0 VCI 35
SAT APR 30 12:30:50 2011
Connecting session(0): Auto Registration due to Manual Connect
SAT APR 30 12:30:41 2011
Disconnecting session(-1): due to PADT received
SAT APR 30 12:30:41 2011
Received PADT for session id 7450
SAT APR 30 12:30:41 2011
PPP DISCONNECTED on VPI 0 VCI 35 : PPP commanded down
SAT APR 30 12:30:41 2011
Disconnecting session(0): Auto Registration due to dsl Restart
SAT APR 30 12:30:32 2011
US Atten: 34.5 DS Atten: 57.0
SAT APR 30 12:30:32 2011
US Margin: 23.0 DS Margin: 11.0
SAT APR 30 12:30:32 2011
US Tx Power: 11.9 DS Tx Power: 17.1
SAT APR 30 12:30:32 2011
US DSL Rate: 447 kbits/sec DS DSL Rate: 1179 kbits/sec
SAT APR 30 12:30:32 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is UP
SAT APR 30 12:30:02 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is Down
SAT APR 30 10:41:53 2011
CWMP: Final Http Return Code = 204
SAT APR 30 10:41:53 2011
CWMP: Inform (200). The following events are true: 4 VALUE CHANGE
SAT APR 30 10:41:53 2011
CWMP: TCP Connected, SSL Connection Succeeded, Auth Type = Basic
SAT APR 30 10:41:52 2011
CWMP: Inform (401). The following events are true: 4 VALUE CHANGE
SAT APR 30 10:41:52 2011
CWMP: TCP Connected, SSL Connection Succeeded, Auth Type = Basic
SAT APR 30 10:41:26 2011
Setting System clock to Local time SAT APR 30 10:41:25 2011
SAT APR 30 10:41:26 2011
Time set from Primary SNTP server: tock.usno.navy.mil
SAT APR 30 10:41:22 2011
PPP CONNECTED on VPI 0 VCI 35
SAT APR 30 10:41:21 2011
Connecting session(0): Auto Registration due to Manual Connect
SAT APR 30 10:41:12 2011
Disconnecting session(-1): due to PADT received
SAT APR 30 10:41:12 2011
Received PADT for session id 7346
SAT APR 30 10:41:12 2011
PPP DISCONNECTED on VPI 0 VCI 35 : PPP commanded down
SAT APR 30 10:41:12 2011
Disconnecting session(0): Auto Registration due to dsl Restart
SAT APR 30 10:41:03 2011
US Atten: 34.5 DS Atten: 57.0
SAT APR 30 10:41:03 2011
US Margin: 23.0 DS Margin: 10.5
SAT APR 30 10:41:03 2011
US Tx Power: 11.9 DS Tx Power: 17.4
SAT APR 30 10:41:03 2011
US DSL Rate: 447 kbits/sec DS DSL Rate: 1179 kbits/sec
SAT APR 30 10:41:03 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is UP
SAT APR 30 10:39:29 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is Down
SAT APR 30 10:24:50 2011
CWMP: Final Http Return Code = 204
SAT APR 30 10:24:50 2011
CWMP: Inform (200). The following events are true: 4 VALUE CHANGE
SAT APR 30 10:24:50 2011
CWMP: TCP Connected, SSL Connection Succeeded, Auth Type = Basic
SAT APR 30 10:24:49 2011
CWMP: Inform (401). The following events are true: 4 VALUE CHANGE
SAT APR 30 10:24:49 2011
CWMP: TCP Connected, SSL Connection Succeeded, Auth Type = Basic
SAT APR 30 10:24:23 2011
Setting System clock to Local time SAT APR 30 10:24:22 2011
SAT APR 30 10:24:23 2011
Time set from Primary SNTP server: tock.usno.navy.mil
SAT APR 30 10:24:19 2011
PPP CONNECTED on VPI 0 VCI 35
SAT APR 30 10:24:19 2011
Connecting session(0): Auto Registration due to Manual Connect
SAT APR 30 10:24:10 2011
Disconnecting session(-1): due to PADT received
SAT APR 30 10:24:10 2011
Received PADT for session id 7322
SAT APR 30 10:24:10 2011
PPP DISCONNECTED on VPI 0 VCI 35 : PPP commanded down
SAT APR 30 10:24:10 2011
Disconnecting session(0): Auto Registration due to dsl Restart
SAT APR 30 10:24:01 2011
US Atten: 34.5 DS Atten: 57.0
SAT APR 30 10:24:01 2011
US Margin: 22.0 DS Margin: 9.5
SAT APR 30 10:24:01 2011
US Tx Power: 11.9 DS Tx Power: 17.3
SAT APR 30 10:24:01 2011
US DSL Rate: 447 kbits/sec DS DSL Rate: 1179 kbits/sec
SAT APR 30 10:24:01 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is UP
SAT APR 30 10:23:30 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is Down
SAT APR 30 10:21:42 2011
CWMP: Final Http Return Code = 204
SAT APR 30 10:21:42 2011
CWMP: Inform (200). The following events are true: 4 VALUE CHANGE
SAT APR 30 10:21:42 2011
CWMP: TCP Connected, SSL Connection Succeeded, Auth Type = Basic
SAT APR 30 10:21:41 2011
CWMP: Inform (401). The following events are true: 4 VALUE CHANGE
SAT APR 30 10:21:41 2011
CWMP: TCP Connected, SSL Connection Succeeded, Auth Type = Basic
SAT APR 30 10:21:13 2011
Setting System clock to Local time SAT APR 30 10:21:11 2011
SAT APR 30 10:21:13 2011
Time set from Primary SNTP server: tock.usno.navy.mil
SAT APR 30 10:21:11 2011
PPP CONNECTED on VPI 0 VCI 35
SAT APR 30 10:21:11 2011
Connecting session(0): Auto Registration due to Manual Connect
SAT APR 30 10:21:02 2011
Disconnecting session(-1): due to PADT received
SAT APR 30 10:21:02 2011
Received PADT for session id 7166
SAT APR 30 10:21:02 2011
PPP DISCONNECTED on VPI 0 VCI 35 : PPP commanded down
SAT APR 30 10:21:02 2011
Disconnecting session(0): Auto Registration due to dsl Restart
SAT APR 30 10:20:53 2011
US Atten: 34.5 DS Atten: 57.0
SAT APR 30 10:20:53 2011
US Margin: 23.0 DS Margin: 8.0
SAT APR 30 10:20:53 2011
US Tx Power: 11.9 DS Tx Power: 17.5
SAT APR 30 10:20:53 2011
US DSL Rate: 447 kbits/sec DS DSL Rate: 1179 kbits/sec
SAT APR 30 10:20:53 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is UP
SAT APR 30 10:20:22 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is Down
SAT APR 30 09:53:03 2011
CWMP: Final Http Return Code = 204
SAT APR 30 09:53:03 2011
CWMP: Inform (200). The following events are true: 4 VALUE CHANGE
SAT APR 30 09:53:03 2011
CWMP: TCP Connected, SSL Connection Succeeded, Auth Type = Basic
SAT APR 30 09:53:02 2011
CWMP: Inform (401). The following events are true: 4 VALUE CHANGE
SAT APR 30 09:53:02 2011
CWMP: TCP Connected, SSL Connection Succeeded, Auth Type = Basic
SAT APR 30 09:52:36 2011
Setting System clock to Local time SAT APR 30 09:52:33 2011
SAT APR 30 09:52:36 2011
Time set from Primary SNTP server: tock.usno.navy.mil
SAT APR 30 09:52:32 2011
PPP CONNECTED on VPI 0 VCI 35
SAT APR 30 09:52:31 2011
Connecting session(0): Auto Registration due to Manual Connect
SAT APR 30 09:52:21 2011
US Atten: 34.5 DS Atten: 57.0
SAT APR 30 09:52:21 2011
US Margin: 22.0 DS Margin: 9.5
SAT APR 30 09:52:21 2011
US Tx Power: 11.5 DS Tx Power: 17.4
SAT APR 30 09:52:21 2011
US DSL Rate: 447 kbits/sec DS DSL Rate: 1179 kbits/sec
SAT APR 30 09:52:21 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is UP
SAT APR 30 09:51:59 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is Down
SAT APR 30 09:49:58 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is Down
SAT APR 30 09:49:53 2011
US Atten: 34.5 DS Atten: 57.0
SAT APR 30 09:49:53 2011
US Margin: 22.0 DS Margin: 4.5
SAT APR 30 09:49:53 2011
US Tx Power: 11.9 DS Tx Power: 17.2
SAT APR 30 09:49:53 2011
US DSL Rate: 447 kbits/sec DS DSL Rate: 1179 kbits/sec
SAT APR 30 09:49:53 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is UP
SAT APR 30 09:49:53 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is Down
SAT APR 30 09:49:48 2011
US Atten: 34.5 DS Atten: 57.0
SAT APR 30 09:49:48 2011
US Margin: 22.0 DS Margin: 9.5
SAT APR 30 09:49:48 2011
US Tx Power: 11.9 DS Tx Power: 17.2
SAT APR 30 09:49:48 2011
US DSL Rate: 447 kbits/sec DS DSL Rate: 1179 kbits/sec
SAT APR 30 09:49:48 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is UP
SAT APR 30 09:49:23 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is Down
SAT APR 30 09:49:18 2011
US Atten: 34.5 DS Atten: 57.0
SAT APR 30 09:49:18 2011
US Margin: 23.0 DS Margin: 3.0
SAT APR 30 09:49:18 2011
US Tx Power: 12.0 DS Tx Power: 17.3
SAT APR 30 09:49:18 2011
US DSL Rate: 447 kbits/sec DS DSL Rate: 1179 kbits/sec
SAT APR 30 09:49:18 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is UP
SAT APR 30 09:49:18 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is Down
SAT APR 30 09:49:11 2011
Disconnecting session(-1): due to PADT received
SAT APR 30 09:49:11 2011
Received PADT for session id 7150
SAT APR 30 09:49:10 2011
PPP DISCONNECTED on VPI 0 VCI 35 : PPP commanded down
SAT APR 30 09:49:10 2011
Disconnecting session(0): Auto Registration due to dsl Restart
SAT APR 30 09:49:01 2011
US Atten: 34.5 DS Atten: 57.0
SAT APR 30 09:49:01 2011
US Margin: 23.0 DS Margin: 10.0
SAT APR 30 09:49:01 2011
US Tx Power: 12.0 DS Tx Power: 17.3
SAT APR 30 09:49:01 2011
US DSL Rate: 447 kbits/sec DS DSL Rate: 1179 kbits/sec
SAT APR 30 09:49:01 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is UP
SAT APR 30 09:48:36 2011
WanMgr reports DSL is Down
SAT APR 30 09:48:31 2011
US Atten: 34.5 DS Atten: 57.0
SAT APR 30 09:48:31 2011
US Margin: 23.0 DS Margin: 4.0
SAT APR 30 09:48:31 2011
US Tx Power: 11.9 DS Tx Power: 17.4
end of diagnostic log file

I have sent you a private message regarding your issue.
Anthony_VZ
**If someones post has helped you, please acknowledge their assistance by clicking the red thumbs up button to give them Kudos. If you are the original poster and any response gave you your answer, please mark the post that had the answer as the solution**
Notice: Content posted by Verizon employees is meant to be informational and does not supersede or change the Verizon Forums User Guidelines or Terms or Service, or your Customer Agreement Terms and Conditions or plan

Similar Messages

Macbook pro performing very poor due to Yosemite

Hi,
I bought macbook pro 2012 model just 10 days back. Unfortunately i got yosemite preinstalled. My macbook pro is performing very very poor now .. Please help me in this regard
Problem description:
Very slow performance
EtreCheck version: 2.1.5 (108)
Report generated 12 January 2015 8:06:38 pm IST
Click the [Support] links for help with non-Apple products.
Click the [Details] links for more information about that line.
Click the [Adware] links for help removing adware.
Hardware Information: ℹ️
MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2012) (Verified)
MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro9,2
1 2.5 GHz Intel Core i5 CPU: 2-core
4 GB RAM Upgradeable
BANK 0/DIMM0
2 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
BANK 1/DIMM0
2 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
Bluetooth: Good - Handoff/Airdrop2 supported
Wireless: en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n
Video Information: ℹ️
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Color LCD 1280 x 800
System Software: ℹ️
OS X 10.10.1 (14B25) - Uptime: 3 days 1:6:20
Disk Information: ℹ️
APPLE HDD HTS545050A7E362 disk0 : (500.11 GB)
EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted> [Recovery]: 650 MB
Macintosh HD (disk1) / : 498.89 GB (428.37 GB free)
Core Storage: disk0s2 499.25 GB Online
HL-DT-ST DVDRW GS41N
USB Information: ℹ️
Apple Inc. BRCM20702 Hub
Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
Apple Inc. FaceTime HD Camera (Built-in)
Thunderbolt Information: ℹ️
Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
Configuration files: ℹ️
/etc/hosts - Count: 6
Gatekeeper: ℹ️
Mac App Store and identified developers
Kernel Extensions: ℹ️
/Library/Extensions
[loaded] com.driver.LogJoystick (2.0 - SDK 10.9) [Support]
[loaded] com.logitech.driver.LogiGamingMouseFilter (1 - SDK 10.9) [Support]
Startup Items: ℹ️
MySQLCOM: Path: /Library/StartupItems/MySQLCOM
Startup items are obsolete in OS X Yosemite
Problem System Launch Agents: ℹ️
[killed] com.apple.bird.plist
[killed] com.apple.CallHistoryPluginHelper.plist
[killed] com.apple.CallHistorySyncHelper.plist
[killed] com.apple.cloudd.plist
[killed] com.apple.coreservices.appleid.authentication.plist
[killed] com.apple.EscrowSecurityAlert.plist
[killed] com.apple.icloud.fmfd.plist
[killed] com.apple.nsurlsessiond.plist
[killed] com.apple.pluginkit.pkd.plist
[killed] com.apple.rcd.plist
[killed] com.apple.recentsd.plist
[killed] com.apple.sbd.plist
[killed] com.apple.scopedbookmarkagent.xpc.plist
[killed] com.apple.security.cloudkeychainproxy.plist
[killed] com.apple.spindump_agent.plist
15 processes killed due to memory pressure
Problem System Launch Daemons: ℹ️
[killed] com.apple.AssetCacheLocatorService.plist
[killed] com.apple.awdd.plist
[killed] com.apple.corestorage.corestoragehelperd.plist
[killed] com.apple.ctkd.plist
[killed] com.apple.diagnosticd.plist
[killed] com.apple.emond.aslmanager.plist
[killed] com.apple.icloud.findmydeviced.plist
[killed] com.apple.ifdreader.plist
[killed] com.apple.nehelper.plist
[killed] com.apple.nsurlsessiond.plist
[killed] com.apple.periodic-daily.plist
[killed] com.apple.periodic-weekly.plist
[killed] com.apple.softwareupdate_download_service.plist
[killed] com.apple.spindump.plist
[killed] com.apple.systemstats.analysis.plist
[killed] com.apple.wdhelper.plist
16 processes killed due to memory pressure
Launch Agents: ℹ️
[not loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist [Support]
[not loaded] com.teamviewer.teamviewer.plist [Support]
[not loaded] com.teamviewer.teamviewer_desktop.plist [Support]
Launch Daemons: ℹ️
[loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist [Support]
[loaded] com.teamviewer.Helper.plist [Support]
[not loaded] com.teamviewer.teamviewer_service.plist [Support]
User Launch Agents: ℹ️
[loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist [Support]
[loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist [Support]
[loaded] com.valvesoftware.steamclean.plist [Support]
User Login Items: ℹ️
Android File Transfer Agent Application (/Users/[redacted]/Library/Application Support/Google/Android File Transfer/Android File Transfer Agent.app)
Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 16.0.0.235 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
Flash Player: Version: 16.0.0.235 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
AdobeAAMDetect: Version: AdobeAAMDetect 1.0.0.0 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
Default Browser: Version: 600 - SDK 10.10
Safari Extensions: ℹ️
Searchme [Cached] Adware! [Remove]
3rd Party Preference Panes: ℹ️
Flash Player [Support]
MySQL [Support]
Time Machine: ℹ️
Time Machine not configured!
Top Processes by CPU: ℹ️
 5% WindowServer
 0% fontd
 0% smcFanControl
 0% AppleSpell
 0% Google Chrome
Top Processes by Memory: ℹ️
408 MB com.apple.SpeechRecognitionCore.speechrecognitiond
133 MB Google Chrome
120 MB Skype
86 MB loginwindow
77 MB Pages
Virtual Memory Information: ℹ️
51 MB Free RAM
1.30 GB Active RAM
1.22 GB Inactive RAM
773 MB Wired RAM
45.09 GB Page-ins
646 MB Page-outs
Diagnostics Information: ℹ️
Jan 12, 2015, 01:11:20 PM /Users/[redacted]/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/httpd_2015-01-12-131120_[redac ted].crash
Jan 12, 2015, 01:06:00 PM /Users/[redacted]/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/httpd_2015-01-12-130600_[redac ted].crash
Jan 11, 2015, 11:11:16 PM /Users/[redacted]/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/httpd_2015-01-11-231116_[redac ted].crash
Jan 11, 2015, 11:09:03 PM /Users/[redacted]/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/httpd_2015-01-11-230903_[redac ted].crash

Before buying a second-hand computer, you should have run Apple Diagnostics or the Apple Hardware Test, whichever is applicable.
The first thing to do after buying the computer is to erase the internal drive and install a clean copy of OS X. You—not the original owner—must do that. Changes made by Apple over the years have made this seemingly straightforward task very complex.
How you go about it depends on the model, and on whether you already own another Mac. If you're not sure of the model, enter the serial number on this page. Then find the model on this page to see what OS version was originally installed.
It's unsafe, and may be unlawful, to use a computer with software installed by a previous owner.
1. If you don't own another Mac
a. If the machine shipped with OS X 10.4 or 10.5, you need a boxed and shrink-wrapped retail Snow Leopard (OS X 10.6) installation disc from the Apple Store or a reputable reseller—not from eBay or anything of the kind. If the machine is very old and has less than 1 GB of memory, you'll need to add more in order to install 10.6. Preferably, install as much memory as it can take, according to the technical specifications.
b. If the machine shipped with OS X 10.6, you need the installation media that came with it: gray installation discs, or a USB flash drive for a MacBook Air. You should have received the media from the original owner, but if you didn't, order replacements from Apple. A retail disc, or the gray discs from another model, will not work.
To start up from an optical disc or a flash drive, insert it, then restart the computer and hold down the C key at the startup chime. Release the key when you see the gray Apple logo on the screen.
c. If the machine shipped with OS X 10.7 or later, you don't need media. It should start up in Internet Recovery mode when you hold down the key combination option-command-R at the startup chime. Release the keys when you see a spinning globe.
d. Some 2010-2011 models shipped with OS X 10.6 and received a firmware update after 10.7 was released, enabling them to use Internet Recovery. If you have one of those models, you can't reinstall 10.6 even from the original media, and Internet Recovery will not work either without the original owner's Apple ID. In that case, contact Apple Support, or take the machine to an Apple Store or another authorized service provider to have the OS installed.
2. If you do own another Mac
If you already own another Mac that was upgraded in the App Store to the version of OS X that you want to install, and if the new Mac is compatible with it, then you can install it. Use Recovery Disk Assistant to prepare a USB device, then start up the new Mac from it by holding down the C key at the startup chime. Alternatively, if you have a Time Machine backup of OS X 10.7.3 or later on an external hard drive (not a Time Capsule or other network device), you can start from that by holding down the option key and selecting it from the row of icons that appears. Note that if your other Mac was never upgraded in the App Store, you can't use this method.
3. Partition and install OS X
a. If you see a lock screen when trying to start up from installation media or in Recovery mode, then a firmware password was set by the previous owner, or the machine was remotely locked via iCloud. You'll either have to contact the owner or take the machine to an Apple Store or another service provider to be unlocked. You may be asked for proof of ownership.
b. Launch Disk Utility and select the icon of the internal drive—not any of the volume icons nested beneath it. In the Partition tab, select the default options: a GUID partition table with one data volume in Mac OS Extended (Journaled) format. This operation will permanently remove all existing data on the drive.
c. An unusual problem may arise if all the following conditions apply:
 OS X 10.7 or later was installed by the previous owner
 The startup volume was encrypted with FileVault
 You're booted in Recovery mode (that is, not from a 10.6 installation disc)
In that case, you won't be able to unlock the volume or partition the drive without the FileVault password. Ask for guidance or see this discussion.
d. After partitioning, quit Disk Utility and run the OS X Installer. If you're installing a version of OS X acquired from the App Store, you will need the Apple ID and password that you used. When the installation is done, the system will automatically restart into the Setup Assistant, which will prompt you to transfer the data from another Mac, its backups, or from a Windows computer. If you have any data to transfer, this is usually the best time to do it.
e. Run Software Update and install all available system updates from Apple. To upgrade to a major version of OS X newer than 10.6, get it from the Mac App Store. Note that you can't keep an upgraded version that was installed by the original owner. He or she can't legally transfer it to you, and without the Apple ID you won't be able to update it in Software Update or reinstall, if that becomes necessary. The same goes for any App Store products that the previous owner installed—you have to repurchase them.
4. Other issues
a. If the original owner "accepted" the bundled iLife applications (iPhoto, iMovie, and Garage Band) in the App Store so that he or she could update them, then they're irrevocably linked to that Apple ID and you won't be able to download them without buying them. Reportedly, Mac App Store Customer Service has sometimes issued redemption codes for these apps to second owners who asked.
b. If the previous owner didn't deauthorize the computer in the iTunes Store under his Apple ID, you wont be able to authorize it immediately under your ID. In that case, you'll either have to wait up to 90 days or contact iTunes Support.
c. When trying to create a new iCloud account, you might get a failure message: "Account limit reached." Apple imposes a lifetime limit of three iCloud account setups per device. Erasing the device does not reset the limit. You can still use an iCloud account that was created on another device, but you won't be able to create a new one. Contact iCloud Support for more information. The setup limit doesn't apply to Apple ID accounts used for other services, such as the iTunes and Mac App Stores, or iMessage. You can create as many of those accounts as you like.

Iphone 4s performance very poor after iOS7 update

Hi Guys,
I just thought i'd post my experience on my iphone 4s...
First of all the phone is approx 18 months old.
The phone was perfect until I updated to the popular IOS7 update, cough!!!!
Heres what's happening...
iPhone probs since IOS7 update
First of all the phone never missed a beat until ios7 update. Please don't insult me apple and tell me that this is a coincidence.
-Batt perc poor accuracy readings, sticks on amount for long period until reset, thereafter reads incorrect again. Last week was reading 93% but was actually flat.
-Batt can read low, phone freezes, reboots on its own & batt will then read at a higher perc.
-Phone freezing and rebooting on its own intermittently, either has to be physically switched on (from black screen) or white apple appears & it switches itself on.
-Select msgs or email - white screen appears only.
-Have to reset phone on numerous occasions due to lack of or no response.
-After reset all messages, emails, notifications etc come in all at once
-Will get bulk messages, even from same people.
-Will not open messages or email at times, poss due to signal loss while phone shows still signal bars (States switch in wifi or network)
-Loss wifi all the time, doesn't work at all now. (oddly it worked again in the apple store which left me really baffled?)
-Search for email now poor
-App Store search poor, loading poor
-Alarm clock not working at times
-Switching off on its own
-No response from screen at times and accassional delays when it does work
-Battery drain excessive, even when not being used! I have switched any hidded consumers off
-Very jaggy/not smooth in operation at times
-Opening app, settings etc take too long. An app might 'blink' i.e. Flash off then back on.
-Wifi on at access screen but switched off in settings and therefore can not select on option
There could be a battery issue here but only since ios7 update has this all came into play. I used to really like the phone and enjoyed using it.
I was at the apple store yesterday and the guy showed me that my battery was borderline 79 -80% condition (orange).
He mentioned that there also may be software issues so I am now going to carry out a full retore from new,and post back during the week.
If a company from any technical background that deals with software, and hardware, and the the system or particular part of the network/system/hardware lays down, then you must stand by it.
I am due an update apple if you're listening, but if a battery is going to last only a year and a half or less then I very well may take my chances with another manufacturer. I just can't be bothered with hassle and the thought in my mind waiting on the phone battery failing at some time.
I understand the technology behind it all but maybe apple need to look at the consumption side of things more than the makng a stronger battery. Maybe consider a secondary system using small second battery or solar, with temperature regulation of some sort. Another approach would be to have a primary system (for calls, texts and maybe limited internet) and a secondary system (for apps etc etc) simply controlled by a type of switch/relay/regulator i.e. if the battery drops below 25% you will not get to use secondary systems keeping your phone usable in terms of making calls, which the mobile phone was intended, remember!!!!
I called my phone network company and they said they would cover the bill for a new battery as the guy in apple store suggested would fix the powering issues.
P.S. I emailed apple about this last week, got an auto response stating we'll get back to you in 24 hours, and guess what, they didn't.

I have a similar problem. I have an iPhone 4s that was working perfectly. Almost immediately upon upgrading to iOS7 I noticed that the battery began to drain much quicker. This morning when I tried to recharge the battery it would not recharge. I followed brad805's suggestions. When I took it to the Genius Bar they attempted to remove the battery and directly power the phone from a cable and that did not work. The phone is now completely dead and because it is past the one year warranty period, there is little that the people at the Apple Store can do to help me. I took very good care of the phone when I owned it and there were no incidents to the phone in the time since I upgraded to iOS7. I strongly believe that the upgrade to iOS7 is the contributing factor to this phone failure.
Is there a mechanism to register a complaint with Apple? I understand that phones fail from time to time but based on the posts I am seeing on the internet, I fear that there are additional instances like mine.

Simple MDX performing very poor

Team , This seems to be a very simple Query and not sure why is it taking too much of time for a single day's date range , any pointers would highly be appreciated !
WITH MEMBER [Measures].[Active Census] AS
[Measures].[Active Patient Count]
MEMBER [Measures].[Sum Active Patient Days] AS
SUM(
[Patient].[Patient].[Patient].MEMBERS,
IIF( ([Measures].[Death Count]>0 OR [Measures].[Discharge Count]>0 )
, [Measures].[Active Patient Days]
, NULL
MEMBER [Measures].[Active Medicare Census] AS
SUM(
[Patient].[Patient].[Patient].MEMBERS * [Insurance].[Insurance Type].&[Medicare],
IIF( [Measures].[Active Patient Count] >0 , 1, NULL )
MEMBER [Measures].[Medicare Admits] AS
SUM(
[Patient].[Patient].[Patient].MEMBERS * [Insurance].[Insurance Type].&[Medicare],
IIF( [Measures].[Admission Count] >0 , 1, NULL )
MEMBER [Measures].[Medicare Discharges] AS
SUM(
[Patient].[Patient].[Patient].MEMBERS * [Insurance].[Insurance Type].&[Medicare],
IIF( [Measures].[Discharge Count]>0 , 1, NULL )
MEMBER [Measures].[Medicare Referral Count] AS
SUM(
[Patient].[Patient].[Patient].MEMBERS * [Insurance].[Insurance Type].&[Medicare],
IIF( [Measures].[Referral Count]>0 , 1, NULL )
MEMBER [Measures].[Medicare Admits to Referral Ratio] AS
IIF([Measures].[Medicare Referral Count]=0 OR
ISEMPTY([Measures].[Medicare Referral Count]) , NULL ,[Measures].[Medicare Admits]/[Measures].[Medicare Referral Count])
MEMBER [Measures].[Medicare Admits Discharge Ratio] AS
IIF([Measures].[Medicare Discharges]=0 OR
ISEMPTY([Measures].[Medicare Discharges]) , NULL ,[Measures].[Medicare Admits]/[Measures].[Medicare Discharges])
SELECT
[Measures].[Active Census] -- Census
,[Measures].[Active Medicare Census] -- Census #M/C
,[Measures].[Death Count] -- Deaths
, [Measures].[Referral Count] -- # Referrals
,[Measures].[Admission Count] -- #Admits
,[Measures].[Medicare Admits] -- #Medicare Admits
,[Measures].[Medicare Discharges] -- Medicare Discharges
,[Measures].[Medicare Referral Count] -- #Medicare Referral Count
,[Measures].[Medicare Admits Discharge Ratio] --#Medicare Admits to M/C Discharges Ratio
,[Measures].[Medicare Admits to Referral Ratio] -- #Medicare Admits to M/C Referral Ratio
} ON COLUMNS,
NON EMPTY (
[Business Unit].[Business Unit].[Business Unit].Members *
[Patient Branch].[Patient Branch].[Patient Branch]
) ON ROWS
FROM
SELECT
( STRTOSET(@BusinessUnit), STRTOSET(@PatientBranch) ) ON COLUMNS
FROM [Patient Admissions]
WHERE
IIF ( CDate(@StartDate)>TAIL([Time].[Date].members,1).item(0).member_value,
{ null : TAIL([Time].[Date].members,1).item(0) }
{ STRTOMEMBER("[Time].[DIM TIME].&[" + Format( CDate( @StartDate ) , "yyyyMMdd") + "]"):
STRTOMEMBER("[Time].[DIM TIME].&[" + Format( CDate( @EndDate ) , "yyyyMMdd") + "]") }
Thank You !
Rajkumar Yelugu

Hi Rajkumar,
As you said, it seems to be a very simple query. The only thing that cause the performance can be the CrossJoin function. There are multiple CrossJoin function on your query. If you cross-join medium-sized or large-sized sets (e.g., sets
that contain more than 100 items each), you can end up with a result set that contains many thousands of items—enough to seriously impair performance. For the detail information, please see:
http://sqlmag.com/data-access/cross-join-performance
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

Portege R200 - HDD performance very poor

Hello,
i have a problem with the HDD (Toshiba MK6006GAH 60 GB) performance, because HD Tune Pro reports me:
Tranfer Rate: Minimum: 1.6 MB/s Maximum: 2.2 MB/s Average: 2.2 MB/s
Access Time: 20.7 ms Burst Rate: 2.2 MB/s
I have checked the power options, but the HDD is running all the time.
An error scan shows everything in green, so no problem on the disk. S.M.A.R.T. shows all counters are ok, the health status is reported overall as ok.
HD Tune reports UDMA Mode 5 is active.
Operating system is Windows XP SP3 all patches installed, 1.24 GB of RAM.
Any idea what is wrong?
Regards

Hi
Its a 1,8 IDE (Ultra ATA/DMA-100) 60 GB; 4200 rpm with 2MB cache HDD.
The Ultra DMA/100 (also called Ultra DMA mode 5 or Ultra-ATA100) allows drives to theoretically reach throughputs of 100 Mb/s.
But this is only a theoretical value!
However, if you want you can check the HDD using software called HDD Drive Fitness Test.
You can also buy another HDD in order to test the performance.

OCI Performance Very Poor

I've been experimenting with using
OCI in the Proc Precompiler with
some user defined object types and
varrays. In fact, my code is
essentially the RESET example for
collections in Chap 18 of the "Pro C/C++
Precompiler Programmer's Guide" with
names changed. I tested this code
alongside a similar test using traditional
non object-oriented tables.
The results so far have shown that
the performance of the code which simply
fetches and updates the data, is significantly better with the traditional
method than the one using OCI. In fact,
I cannot find a data configuration in
which using varrays and object types
even comes close to the speed on the
traditional methods.
Has anyone noticed performance hits or
improvements using OCI, object types,
or collections? It would seem odd that
Oracle would spend so much effort to
promote this technology if there was no
performance improvement at all. In fact,
I'm showing that using the collections and object types is 20 times slower! Yikes!
Any feedback on this would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Kristi Uthoff

Start Firefox in [[Safe Mode]] to check if one of your add-ons is causing your problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Tools > Add-ons > Themes).
* Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
See [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] and [[Troubleshooting plugins]]
Create a new profile as a test to check if your current profile is causing the problems. 
See [[Basic Troubleshooting#Make_a_new_profile|Basic Troubleshooting: Make a new profile]] 
There may be extensions and plugins installed by default in a new profile, so check that in "Tools > Add-ons > Extensions & Plugins" 
If that new profile works then you can transfer some files from the old profile to that new profile (be careful not to copy corrupted files) 
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Transferring_data_to_a_new_profile_-_Firefox
If it still happens with a new, unmodified, Firefox profile then maybe security software is causing the problems and you should check that. 
You can also do a malware check. 
See "Spyware on Windows": http://kb.mozillazine.org/Popups_not_blocked and [[Searches are redirected to another site]]

HT4111 Ipad 3 wifi performance very poor whilst using Bluetooth headsets

Anyone else noticing iPad 3 wifi performance slows down significantly whilst using Bluetooth stereo headphones? I can't even stream from YouTube or NBA.tv if I'm paired with Bluetooth headphone ( tried two different headphones). I can switch between Bluetooth and iPad speaker and watch the speed and performance increase instantly. I have and iPad 2 and it does not do this.

Try change the WiFi channel e.g. channel 1, 6, or 11

After installing Mavericks, Excel performs very poorly

I installed Mavericks today from Mountain Lion.
MacBook Pro late 2008, 4GB memory.
Now Excel (14.3.9) barely scrolls. If I load an Excel sheet (filesize: 785KB), it consumes 99% of CPU.   It always worked fine under Mountain Lion and earlier OS's.   This is really a drag and if it can't be fixed soon, this might be the straw that finally breaks this camel's back and forces me to switch to Windows.    I have to have a working Excel.   This is completely ridiculous.
I was stupid for not backing up the computer before installing Mavericks.   If I had, I would restore and go back to Mountain Lion.
Is there any easy way to downgrade?

Never mind.   A reboot seemed to have solved the problem.   Don't know why earlier reboots didn't resolve this, but there must have been some kind of memory glitch.

Hotmail performance very poor, jerky, occassional paralysis, but even a problem trying to fill this in in one go !!

For the last 2 weeks when I am using hotmail, I cannot do anything for more than a few seconds and the systems stops, then starts again. But I've noticed that is equally true when completing this form so is there something wrong with my Firefox. Just had a 5 second gap.

Start Firefox in [[Safe Mode]] to check if one of your add-ons is causing your problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Tools > Add-ons > Themes).
* Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
See [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] and [[Troubleshooting plugins]]
Create a new profile as a test to check if your current profile is causing the problems. 
See [[Basic Troubleshooting#Make_a_new_profile|Basic Troubleshooting: Make a new profile]] 
There may be extensions and plugins installed by default in a new profile, so check that in "Tools > Add-ons > Extensions & Plugins" 
If that new profile works then you can transfer some files from the old profile to that new profile (be careful not to copy corrupted files) 
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Transferring_data_to_a_new_profile_-_Firefox
If it still happens with a new, unmodified, Firefox profile then maybe security software is causing the problems and you should check that. 
You can also do a malware check. 
See "Spyware on Windows": http://kb.mozillazine.org/Popups_not_blocked and [[Searches are redirected to another site]]

Apex report performance is very poor with apex_item.checkbox row selector.

Hi,
I'm working on a report that includes some functionality to be able to select multiple records for further processing.
The report is based on a view that contains a couple of hundred thousand records.
When i make a selection from this view in sqlplus , the performance is acceptable but the apex report based on the same view performes very poorly.
I've noticed that when i omit the apex_item.checkbox from my report query, performance is on par with sqlplus. (factor 10 or so quicker).
Explain plan appears to be the same with or without checkbox function in the select.
My query is:
select apex_item.checkbox(1,tan_id) Select ,
brt_id
, tan_id
, message_id
, conversation_id
, action
, to_acn_code
, information
, brt_created
, tan_created
from (SELECT brt.id brt_id, -- view query
MAX (TAN.id) tan_id,
brt.message_id,
brt.conversation_id,
brt.action,
TAN.to_acn_code,
TAN.information,
brt.created brt_created,
TAN.created tan_created
FROM (SELECT brt_id, id, to_acn_code, information, created
FROM xxcjib_transactions
WHERE tan_type = 'DELIVER' AND status = 'FINISHED') TAN,
xxcjib_berichten brt
WHERE brt.id = TAN.brt_id
GROUP BY brt.id,
brt.message_id,
brt.conversation_id,
brt.action,
TAN.to_acn_code,
TAN.information,
brt.created,
TAN.created)
What could be the reason for the poor performance of the apex report?
And is there another way to select multiple report records without the apex_item.checkbox function?
I'm using apex 3.2 on oracle 10g database.
Thanks,
Niels Ingen Housz
Edited by: user11986529 on 19-mrt-2010 4:06

Thanks for your reply.
Unfortunately changing the pagination doesnt make much of a difference in this case.
Without the checkbox the query takes 2 seconds.
With checkbox it takes well over 30 seconds.
The second report region on this page based on another view seems to perform reasonably well with or without the checkbox.
It has about the same number of records but with a different view query.
There are also a couple of filter items in the where clause of the report queries (same for both reports) based on date and acn_code and both reports have a selectlist item displayed in their regions based on a simple lov. These filter items don't seem to be of influence on the performance.
I have also recreated the report on a seperate page without any other page items or where clause and the same thing occurs.
With the checkbox its very very slow (more like 20 times slower).
Without it , the report performs well.
And another thing, when i run the page with debug on i don't see the actual report query:
0.08: show report
0.08: determine column headings
0.08: activate sort
0.08: parse query as: APEX_CMA_ONT
0.09: print column headings
0.09: rows loop: 30 row(s)
and then the region is displayed.
I am using databaselinks in the views b.t.w
Edited by: user11986529 on 19-mrt-2010 7:11

Macbook Pro 11,2 tests very poor WiFi performance compared to iPad

Configuration:
MBP 11,2 running 10.10.1
Airport Express 2014 vintage
WiFi Scanner.app speed test results on MBP range from 1 to 3 Mbps. My iPad Air (or iPad Mini) in the same physical position tests between 18 and 28 Mbps. WiFi Scanner.app shows SNR of 17 to 18 dbm.
The reason I am testing is because I have noticed network performance on the new MBP to be very poor in our current NZ location. In Palo Alto 2 weeks ago the MBP wifi seemed fine - I didn't bother to test.
Any suggestions would be much appreciated!

Hello .Sup,
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
To troubleshoot the Wi-Fi performance on your iPad please follow the troubleshooting steps in the article below. Also take a look at the recommended settings for Wi-Fi routers.
iOS: Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1398
iOS and OS X: Recommended settings for Wi-Fi routers and access points
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4199
Take care,
Alex H.

URGENT: Migrating from SQL to Oracle results in very poor performance!

*** IMPORTANT, NEED YOUR HELP ***
Dear, I have a banking business solution from Windows/SQL Server 2000 to Sun Solaris/ORACLE 10g migrated. In the test environment everything was working fine. On the production system we have very poor DB performance. About 100 times slower than SQL Server 2000!
Environment at Customer Server Side:
Hardware: SUN Fire 4 CPU's, OS: Solaris 5.8, DB Oracle 8 and 10
Data Storage: Em2
DB access thru OCCI [Environment:OBJECT, Connection Pool, Create Connection]
Depending from older applications it's necessary to run ORACLE 8 as well on the same Server. Since we have running the new solution, which is using ORACLE 10, the listener for ORACLE 8 is frequently gone (or by someone killed?). The performance of the whole ORACLE 10 Environment is very poor. As a result of my analyse I figured out that the process to create a connection to the connection pool takes up to 14 seconds. Now I am wondering if it a problem to run different ORACLE versions on the same Server? The Customer has installed/created the new ORACLE 10 DB with the same user account (oracle) as the older version. To run the new solution we have to change the ORACLE environment settings manually. All hints/suggestions to solve this problem are welcome. Thanks in advance.
Anton

On the production system we have very poor DB performanceHave you identified the cause of the poor performance is not the queries and their plans being generated by the database?
Do you know if some of the queries appear to take more time than what it used to be on old system? Did you analyze such queries to see what might be the problem?
Are you running RBO or CBO?
if stats are generated, how are they generated and how often?
Did you see what autotrace and tkprof has to tell you about problem queries (if in fact such queries have been identified)?
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01/server.101/b10752/sqltrace.htm#1052

Very poor SMB share performance on 3TB time capsule.

Hi,
Is the SMB shares performance on time capsule suposed to be very poor compared to the AFP shares?
My TC will to around 9MB/s transfers using AFP, but on SMB it will do around 1.25MB/s (varies from a few KB/s to peaks of 4MB/s).
I tested both protocols using a ethernet cable connected from my macbook pro directly to the TC.
This is a 3TB time capsule runing firmware 7.6.1, and I did a factory reset before my tests.
Time machine backups were disabled during the tests.
I need SMB for my WDTV media players.

I would not say it is supposed to be.. but you are probably correct that it is very poor.. This issue crops up time and again,,, but not from people running Macs generally.. it is windows that is the problem.
A few things to check.
1. Are the names actually SMB correct?? ie short, no spaces, pure alphanumeric. Both TC name and wireless names if you use wireless.
2. Workgroup set correctly. ie WORKGROUP .. this probably doesn't come up with the Mac but affects most PC connections and possibly the WD TV
3. How old is the TC? If it is an early release Gen 4, you can take it back to 7.5.2 firmware.. frankly much of the trouble was introduced with Lion.. as they changed the SAMBA setup.. I would test from the WDTV.. or a PC.. if it doesn't glitch you are doing better than the Mac can do.. ie the reading in the Mac is pure Lion Lunacy.. https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3206668?start=0&tstart=0
One of those apple changes that shows.. they hardly test anything anymore. Do a google search for Lion SMB fix.

After enabling rewrite proxy -- performance very very poor

Hi,
I have installed Gateway on different machine and Protal server with rewriter on another machine.
Wihtout rewriter proxy (10443) , the application was working very fast when I access through internet.
After enabling rewriter proxy , the performance is very very poor. When I access the application from internet its taking 2 minutes to show the login page then for validation 3 minutes its taking.
Could you please help me on this
Thanks in Advance

My ISP is Speakeasy. (I'm in the process of switching to AT&T, though.)
The only model number on the unit is WRT330N, so I'm not sure what other model number you mean. (Do you mean the FCC number, which is Q87-WRT330N? Or do you mean the serial number?)
I'm running firmware version 1.00.4, which appears to be the latest version. And my main computers are running Mac OS X.

Very poor network performance with a G4

I have a white & grey G4 (1.25GHz and 256MB) running OS X 10.4.5. It's exhibiting very poor network performance, e.g. it will not FTP files over a LAN at more than about 40KB/second.
Other nodes on the same switch perform fine, as do other ports on the switch. The machine is set to autodetect for speed & duplex, so my question is -- how do I debug this? I've tried swapping network cables already...
Thanks!
Chris

This came down to an incompatibility between the G4 and the Cisco. When the switch is set to force 100Mbit but negotiate duplex, the G4 doesn't like it. Going back to auto speed & duplex fixed the problem...

DSL performing very poorly...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for