Dual Booting Windows and Solaris

Hi
how do i dual boot windows and solaris
Do i install windows first and then solaris or do it the other way around..?
how do i make sure that Windows and Solaris appear in my boot options..?
Is their a guide on doing this...?
Thanks
Liam

Hey I did a quick google search for you. So I havent tried this method myself but it sounds reasonable.
The text below is from the following link:
http://www.hccfl.edu/pollock/AUnix1/DualBoot.htm
"Solaris boot loader
Partition the drive to leave at least 2GB of space available for Solaris;
more drive space is desirable.
As with Linux, install Windows first then Solaris.
Do not use the Installation CD but boot and install
from Software CD 1.
If you accept the default partitioning scheme which
the installer provides you will soon run out of space in
your / and /usr partitions since only enough space is
allocated to install the system.
All extra space is allocated to /export/home.
A typical installation on a 4.5GB partition might look
something like this:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c0d0s0 900M 536M 310M 64% /
/dev/dsk/c0d0s1 334M 109M 192M 36% /var
swap 671M 8.0k 671M 1% /var/run
swap 671M 8.0k 671M 1% /tmp
/dev/dsk/c0d0s5 845M 222M 565M 29% /opt
# (FAT32 partition):
/dev/dsk/c0d0p0:1 5.0G 3.3G 1.6G 66% /c
/dev/dsk/c0d0s7 1.1G 92M 954M 9% /export/home
/dev/dsk/c0d0s4 752M 225M 474M 33% /usr/local
The Solaris boot selector enables you to choose either
Solaris or Windows with Solaris as the default.
(I prefer grub or lilo!)
To mount FAT under Solaris:
# mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c0d0p0:c /dos (or �:1�?)
And the vfstab file:
/dev/dsk/c0d0p0:c - /dos pcfs - yes -
To create a GRUB boot floppy, follow these steps:
$ mkfs -t ext2 /dev/fd0
$ mount /dev/fd0 /mnt/fd0
$ mkdir /mnt/fd0/boot /mnt/fd0/boot/grub
$ cp /boot/grub/stage[12] /boot/grub/grub.conf \
> /mnt/fd0/boot/grub
$ /sbin/grub --batch <
Hope this helps!
/Oscar

Similar Messages

  • Dual boot Windows and Linux?

    I recently bought a T61, and will be taking a programming course.  One prof I spoke with said they ask us to use Unix tools, so one option is to dual boot linux and Windows.  I haven't decided yet whether I will keep Windows Ultimate, or go to XP for this.  But I was wondering how easy/hard is it to make this work, and what kind of steps need to be taken?   If you could point me towards any good tutorials/guides that would be appreciated too.
    Also, I have never really used linux, so which version is best?  I will be needing it for programming, but also still want to do the basics like web surfing, music, dvd's, burning discs, etc.  I have an old copy of Ubuntu that I never used, but its probably about 4 years old.  Is this still acceptable or will I need something newer?
    Message Edited by amace on 05-29-2008 01:28 PM
    T61 15.4" T9300 (2.5GHz 6MB L2) Windows 7 Professional x64 4GB Memory, NVidia Quadro NVS 140M

    Hi,
    If it's just a couple of programming courses that you are going to take I suggest you'd try out VMware player:
    http://www.vmware.com/products/player/
    You can get this software for free and since your system packs a lot of punch it will be able to run it smoothly without any hassle. I'm an engineering grad student and I have to do alot of programming. I've used VMware player before to do some software developement in Ubuntu when I didn't have enough HD to install dual boot but still couldn't do all my other stuff without XP.
    VMware Ubuntu will need a bit of fiddling to get it work just right (USB devices, etc) but it shouldn't be harder than installing a dual boot (actually it is alot easier for my opinion). The only down side is that file sharing between VMware and Windows can be somewhat difficult. I used an external USB drive to share my files but you could always set up Samba to handle file sharing.
    I hope this helps out with your decision.

  • Dual Booting Windows and Arch (SOLVED!)

    Hello all, I'm having trouble getting a windows partition activated again. (Windows was on here for many years, then I installed arch on a separate partition.)
    Here is the layout of fdisk -l:
    Disk /dev/sda: 100.0 GB, 100030242816 bytes
    255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 12161 cylinders
    Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
    Disk identifier: 0x00000000
       Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
    /dev/sda1   *           1        7833    62918541    7  HPFS/NTFS
    /dev/sda2            7834       12039    33784695   83  Linux
    /dev/sda3           12040       12161      979965   82  Linux swap / Solaris
    sda1 is the windows partition, and sda2 is the arch partition. The linux partition SHOULD be primary bootable (have the * next to it),but all my attempts to do this have failed. (I've used "testdisk" to change the flags, but for some reason it keeps reverting back to setting sda 1 as primary bootable after a reboot or 2).
    This is the pertinent section of /boot/grub/menu.lst:
    title  Arch Linux
    root   (hd0,1)
    kernel /boot/vmlinuz26 root=/dev/disk/by-uuid/f3be3baa-3b62-460c-8801-64b0b1cca$
    initrd /boot/kernel26.img
    # (1) Arch Linux
    title  Arch Linux Fallback
    root   (hd0,1)
    kernel /boot/vmlinuz26 root=/dev/disk/by-uuid/f3be3baa-3b62-460c-8801-64b0b1cca$
    initrd /boot/kernel26-fallback.img
    # (1) Windows
    title Windows XP
    rootnoverify (hd0,0)
    makeactive
    chainloader +1
    I have a . . . modified . . . copy of XP Professional, which comes with a recovery console to reinstall the MBR if it's necessary.
    From what I've researched, I somehow need to reinstall grub to the second partition, make the second partition primary bootable, then rewrite the MBR on the first partition, and correct any command errors in menu.lst, but I haven't really figure out a way to do it.
    Thanks in advance for your help!
    Last edited by mongoose088 (2008-12-20 21:48:18)

    I read up on some documentation of installing GRUB to the MBR.
    So far, I went into ArchLive (from the cd) and did the following
    grub> root (hd0,1)
    grub> setup (hd0)
    The installation reports success with no errors, but the problem persists. Arch linux will boot fine, but when I select XP it flashes my configuration, like so:
    title Windows XP
    rootnoverify (hd0,0)
    makeactive
    chainloader +1
    then kicks me back to the OS select GRUB screen. Did I install it to the wrong place?
    EDIT:
    I decided to issue this command:
    grub> setup(hd0,1)
    It reported some errors, then arch couldn't mount the ntfs partition because of possible MFT cluster errors.
    Using testdisk, I repaired the boot sector and MFT clusters, then using ArchLive reinstalled grub with grub>(hd0)
    Arch and Arch Fallback will boot correctly, but now the windows side shows an error:
    rootnoverify (hd0,0)
    makeactive
    chainloader +1
    Loading stage2Read Error (or something to this extent)
    I wonder if this error brings me closer or farther to a solution?
    Thanks for the replies so far!
    Last edited by mongoose088 (2008-12-20 05:41:43)

  • Dual-Booting Windows and Android on Yoga Tablet 2 13?

    So I am a big fan of the lenovo yoga tablet so I started looking into the new versions of the tablet and I came upon something curious. both the yoga tablet 2 pro and the yoga tablet 2 13 (windows)  have the same processor (a 64-bit processor) as well as very similar technical specs(the main difference being the windows edition has 4GB of ram instead of 2GB and a larger battery no doubt due to the removal of the integrted pico projector). as well Lenovo has the source code for the android build in the pro available on the website.
    So my question is if both are running off the same 64-bit processor is there anything stopping someone from compiling the yoga 2 pro source code and installing the yoga 2 pro android OS onto the Windows version of the tablet (dual-booting both) aside from secure boot needing to be disabled?
    after scouring the internet and asking a few lenovo representatives I have found absolutely no information on this (the lenovo reps I spoke to couldn't even confirm the specs of the processors but I found that data from the intel ark database) and it is something I really would like to do if possible (especially with android 5.0 having x86 support integrated in the vanila build)
    So anyone have any information on anyone trying this or something similar being attempted?

    so, lenovo putted a really bad bios on thoses tablets.
    http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/Windows-based-Tablets/Alternatives-OSes-and-CMS-under-Yoga-1051/td-p/190...
    To make it short, the uefi bios used on yoga tablets support only x86 so, the x86-64 instruction set can't be used, on windows. Without CSM (compatibility support module) you can't even try to boot some oses. For linux you need to mod it, i'll try later but, i can't build a new bios and lenovo is not present on this board

  • Stream 7, dual boot, windows and android

    Given that the HP Stream 7 can be equipped with lots of storage, why not dual boot it with Window and Andoid so I can have the best of both worlds
    can this tablet be configured to do that?

    Before going to a lot of trouble, I'd get a boot disk on USB with Android X86 on it.  Then boot off the USB.
    I'd also suggest using 4.22 or 4.4, not 5.0.  "Everyone" is still working on 5.0.x.
    I've not had much luck on a few devices and Android x86 - hence my suggestion.  I have NOT tried it on the Stream 7

  • [SOLVE] Dual Boot Windows and ArchLinux with Syslinux

    Ok, i installed ArchLinux on my laptop with Windows XP (syslinux) and I cannot find get Windows to boot or mount it. I have tried to do what i can to do this but cannot. I Installed XP first like a should and something i think might be needed to know is after i created the partitions scheme (10Gb (boot partition), 50GB (XP), 80GB(was unallocated)). The installation disk formated both 2 partitions in NTFS but i installed XP on the second and Windows reported them as C and D drives. Windows being D. Thought that was bit werid thinking Windows installed the mbr on that partition. When I installed ArchLinux, it did have the boot flag set on 10GB (or C drive).
    Since I installed ArchLinux, I have been unable to find a solution to mounting/booting to Windows. Installed NTFS-3G and that didn't work when i tried mount /dev/sda3 windows and i did created a folder named windows but got ...
    mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda3,
    missing codepage or helper program, or other error
    In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
    dmesg | tail or so.
    Tried dmesg | tail and got
    [ 76.524133] SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, realtime, large block/inode numbers, no debug enabled
    [ 179.468499] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.LPC0.ACAD: ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK event: unsupported
    [ 705.472330] 8139too 0000:02:03.0 enp2s3: link down
    [ 717.380879] 8139too 0000:02:03.0 enp2s3: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x41E1
    [ 726.447184] 8139too 0000:02:03.0 enp2s3: link down
    [ 727.596128] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.LPC0.ACAD: ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK event: unsupported
    [ 732.616138] 8139too 0000:02:03.0 enp2s3: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x41E1
    [ 733.848832] 8139too 0000:02:03.0 enp2s3: link down
    [ 834.062062] 8139too 0000:02:03.0 enp2s3: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x41E1
    [ 2131.449211] perf samples too long (2534 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50100
    This is when i run sudo lsblk
    NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
    sda 8:0 0 149.1G 0 disk
    |-sda1 8:1 0 9.8G 0 part /boot
    |-sda2 8:2 0 1K 0 part
    |-sda3 8:3 0 53.6G 0 part
    `-sda5 8:5 0 85.7G 0 part /
    sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom
    My syslinux is
    LABEL arch
    MENU LABEL Arch Linux
    LINUX ../vmlinuz-linux
    APPEND root=/dev/sda5 rw
    INITRD ../initramfs-linux.img
    LABEL windows
    MENU LABEL Windows
    COM32 chain.c32
    APPEND hd0 3
    NOTE: chain is in the same directory with syslinux
    I really think Windows got corrupted but not sure. Thought about repairing the mbr on windows and booting to it then reinstall syslinux but really don't want too.
    Thanks in advance
    Last edited by jag-ster (2014-11-27 02:12:12)

    Here is the partition table:
    /dev/sda1 one HUGE linux /boot primary partition (assuming ext4)
    /dev/sda2 "name" of the extended partition
    /dev/sda3 primary Windows partition (assuming NTFS)
    /dev/sda5 logical Linux root partition (assuming ext4)
    /dev/sda1 to /dev/sda4 are either all primary, or three primary and one extended. After /dev/sda4 all partitions are logical. If you're still wondering why is there no /dev/sda4, it's because you have 2 primary and one extended, so /dev/sda4 is reserved for another primary partition.
    Windows problem:
    The /dev/sda1 which Windows named C: is Windows equivalent of linux /boot. When you told linux to place its /boot on /dev/sda1 it formated boot files of Windows. Now you have Windows OS with no kernel. In other words there is no way to boot Windows if you don't reinstall it. Actually there is a way, but you would than screw up Arch.
    Mounting problem:
    You can never mount extended partition, only logical (an extended partition is made of logical partitions). You want to do:
    sudo mount /dev/sda3 -t NTFS-3g -o rw,uid=YourUserName /path/where/you/want/this/partition/mounted
    EDIT:
    Try it this way:
    - Backup all your data
    - Delete every partition
    - Start Windows installation
    - Make only one partition (c:/ for Windows)
    - Let Windows make another partition
    - Make one more so you could have a data partition, which does not need to be formated to reinstall Windows
    - Start Arch installation
    - Get to partitioning
        =Partitioning=
        - /dev/sda4 extended (take the rest of the drive)
        - /dev/sda5 logical /boot 512MiB
        - /dev/sda6 logical /          20GiB
        - /dev/sda7 logical /home (the rest)
    Making a separate /home partition will come in handy when reinstalling Arch (any linux distribution), or switching between distros, because it is the equivalent of D:/ in Windows. Also consider LVM.
    Last edited by bstaletic (2014-02-28 23:25:33)

  • [Success] Dual Booting Arch and Windows 7 [Advice / Confirmation]

    So I have been trying to get Starcraft II to work with wine and no luck.
    I have decided to install windows back on my computer, besides it might come in handy since I'm heading back to school soon.
    Anyways I have tried dual booting arch and windows in the past, and my results have never been stable.
    Today I will try using the program gparted.
    Let me give you my thoughts on how I plan to go through this and please give me some advice so I don't loose everything I have worked for on my linux box
    1.Currently I have two hard drives, one for all my main programs and one for my media files (mounting usb, dvd, etc, and it actually has no files in it xD).
       I plan to use gparted to re-size my second harddrive (media drive), create an extended partition, and a logical ntfs partition within it.
    2.I pop in my windows cd that I recieved with my laptop and install it on the space I have partitioned for windows.
    3. If my grub gets wiped out my windows (which I hope it doesn't not sure how the MBR stuff works) I insert a Ubuntu live cd and do
    sudo grub
    > root (hd0,0)
    > setup (hd0)
    > exit
    4.Configure grub to boot windows 7.
    5.Be happy with no headache.
    SO....
    If someone with past experience with dual booting windows and arch could please give me some advice, as I do not want to lose all my data, start over, and have another headache.
    I know I must learn to backup arch, which I will before september.
    But if anyone has any protips, or sees a flaw in my plan please point it out!!!
    Thank you very much for taking the time to read this and even more if advice has been given to boost my confidence!
    For now I will wait
    Thank you fellow archies.
    Last edited by Jabrick (2011-07-03 01:29:36)

    satanselbow wrote:
    1) Windows must be installed to a primary partition - attempting to install it to an logical partition will result in an epic fail
    2) Physically disconnect the harddrive you do not want windows on as windows typically installs the bootloader on the 1st hardisk (ie /sda) regardless of installation drive (ie /sdb)
    3 / 4) Complete the windows installation then reattached your Arch drive and edit /boot/grub/menu.lst (as root) pointing the W7 entry to (hd1,0) - no need to reinstall grub
    5) Hey it's windows - anything could happen
    If you create an NTFS partition right at the beginning of the the drive before you start the W7 install you can prevent it greedily using up 2 of you 4 primary partitions - I would also completely update you new W7 installation past SP1 before reattaching the other drive to further prevent W7 going mental
    satanselbow thank you so much!
    Everything works great I had no stumbles, and I hope no problems in the future!!
    I will post exactly what I did in case someone has the same issue.
    1. Partition you're secondary harddrive as primary ntfs with gparted
    2. Reboot, and if you get a file system check error, check you're udev rules. (For my case in particular I had to change the udev rules I got for auto mounting usb, ext harddrive, etc.
    3.Power off your computer and physically remove the harddrive that contains all your linux goodies
    4. Plug in your windows cd and install in the partition you created
    5. Update your windows OS
    6. Plug in Ubuntu live CD and reboot
    7. Use commands to get grub to overwrite the windows boot loader (In my case I put grub everyone hd0,0 hd0,1 just to be sure, but you might want to do things cleaner)
    8. Reboot and see if grub loads up
    9. Use Ubuntu live CD again and launch Gparted, select the boot to your extra linux space (if you had one, not sure if this is needed)
    10. Plug in your linux harddrive and reconfigure /boot/grub/menu.lst and your good to go
    Once again shout outs to satanselbow!!! For without him I might've failed brutally!
    Cheers!

  • Advice on dual-booting Windows 7 with UEFI motherboard

    I'm going to build a desktop PC tomorrow, having finally purchased all the parts for it. I'll be installing Arch as my main OS, and Windows for gaming. However I'm not really versed in UEFI and its uses, advantages/disadvantages; since my laptop just uses BIOS.
    My plan is to have 3 drives: 32GB SSD for the / partition, 1TB HDD for /home, and 500GB for Windows 7 x64 Ultimate.
    Being unused to UEFI I was thinking about trying to just run everything in BIOS/Legacy mode, but that doesn't seem very sensible to me, especially since I have the hardware so I might as well use it.
    So, reading the wiki and forums have led me to conclude that having a 1GB EFI System Partition on the SSD should be sufficient, and use gummiboot for my bootloader.
    Other reading about setting up dual boots suggests to me that installing Windows 7 on its own HDD with MBR partitioning and Arch on a separate (set of) drive(s) with GPT partitioning will be sufficient. The reason being that if the BIOS is set up to boot sda, which has GRUB as its bootloader, using GRUB I can choose to boot into Windows despite it being on a separate hard drive.
    My questions are (and it occurs to me that I am in the most part just looking to have my ideas confirmed):
    1. Have I gotten this all completely wrong?
    2. If I'm correct, can the above system of using GRUB on one drive to boot up an OS on another drive be applied to UEFI?
    3. Has anybody tried/succeeded/failed to dual-boot in this fashion before me, and if so what did they do?
    Thanks one and all! Hopefully I've made myself clear enough here

    billodwyer wrote:Being unused to UEFI I was thinking about trying to just run everything in BIOS/Legacy mode, but that doesn't seem very sensible to me, especially since I have the hardware so I might as well use it.
    Using BIOS/CSM/legacy mode can work fine; however, it will probably slow down the boot process by a few seconds, and it will close off some possible future (and even current) advantages, as EFI support in Linux is improved.
    So, reading the wiki and forums have led me to conclude that having a 1GB EFI System Partition on the SSD should be sufficient, and use gummiboot for my bootloader.
    A 1GB ESP is more than sufficient. In terms of space requirements, 100-500MB is enough, depending on how you use the ESP; but various bugs and default settings make me recommend 550MiB as a good size. Bigger is OK, but wastes some disk space.
    A bigger issue is that the ESP won't really benefit much from being on your SSD, since it's read once at boot time. The biggest advantage to putting the ESP on the SSD in your setup is that if you use gummiboot, you'll also have to put the Linux kernel and initrd file on the ESP, so having them on an SSD will speed up the boot process by about 1-5 seconds. Overall, I'd probably put the ESP on one of the spinning disks.
    One more comment: gummiboot can launch boot loaders from its own partition but not from other partitions. This can work fine if you plan things carefully, but with three disks and two OSes, you must be absolutely positive that Windows uses the ESP on which gummiboot is installed. I'm not an expert on Windows installation, so I can't offer any specific pointers or caveats on this. If you need something with more flexibility, both rEFInd and GRUB can redirect the boot process to other partitions or physical disks. rEFInd can also redirect from an EFI-mode boot to a BIOS/CSM/legacy-mode boot. (See below.) Overall, rEFInd's flexibility on this score is a plus compared to gummiboot; but gummiboot is covered in the Arch wiki's beginner's guide, which is a plus. You'll have to pick which advantage you prefer. (Note that I'm rEFInd's maintainer, so I'm not unbiased.)
    Other reading about setting up dual boots suggests to me that installing Windows 7 on its own HDD with MBR partitioning and Arch on a separate (set of) drive(s) with GPT partitioning will be sufficient. The reason being that if the BIOS is set up to boot sda, which has GRUB as its bootloader, using GRUB I can choose to boot into Windows despite it being on a separate hard drive.
    This is an unworkable idea, at least as stated and if you want to do an EFI-mode boot. Windows ties the partition table type to the boot mode: Windows boots from MBR disks only in BIOS mode, and from GPT disks only in EFI mode. Thus, using MBR for the Windows disk will require a BIOS/CSM/legacy-mode installation of Windows. Furthermore, neither gummiboot nor GRUB can redirect from EFI mode to BIOS mode (or vice-versa), so if you do it this way, you'll be forcing yourself to boot Linux in BIOS mode, to switch between BIOS-mode and EFI-mode boots at the firmware level (which isn't always easily controlled), or to use rEFInd to redirect from an EFI-mode boot to a BIOS-mode Windows boot.
    Overall, you're best off either using GPT for all your disks and booting all your OSes in EFI mode or using MBR for Windows (and perhaps all your disks) and using BIOS-mode booting for all your OSes.
    Under EFI, the boot process is controlled by settings in the NVRAM, which you can adjust with "efibootmgr" in Linux, "bcfg" in an EFI shell, or "bcdedit" in Windows. (The Arch wiki covers the basics at least efibootmgr and bcfg.) In a typical dual-boot setup, you tell the computer to launch your preferred boot manager (EFI-mode GRUB, rEFInd, or gummiboot, most commonly), which then controls the boot process. You set up boot loaders for all your OSes on one or more ESPs. (Note: A boot manager lets you choose which boot loader to run, and a boot loader loads the kernel into memory. GRUB is both a boot manager and a boot loader. rEFInd and gummiboot are both boot managers. The EFI stub loader, ELILO, and the EFI version of SYSLINUX are all boot loaders but not boot managers. Most EFIs include their own boot manager, but it's usually primitive and awkward to use. It's also not standardized, so my computer's built-in boot manager is likely to be different from yours. Thus, I recommend against relying on the built-in boot manager for anything but launching your preferred boot manager.) Thus, the lowest-common-denominator type of setup is to put your preferred boot manager, the Windows boot loader, and a Linux boot loader (which could mean your Linux kernel) on a single ESP. If you want to use multiple ESPs or otherwise split things up, you cannot use gummiboot as the boot manager, since it can't redirect the boot process from one partition to another. (Many EFIs can do this with their own built-in boot managers, but this isn't guaranteed, and it's usually more awkward than using rEFInd or GRUB.)
    I know this can be a lot to absorb. The official rules aren't really all that complex, but different EFIs interpret the rules differently, and the different capabilities of the various boot managers and boot loaders creates a lot of subtle implications for how you set everything up.
    1. Have I gotten this all completely wrong?
    Significant parts of it, I'm afraid; see above. You're working under BIOS assumptions, which don't apply to EFI.
    2. If I'm correct, can the above system of using GRUB on one drive to boot up an OS on another drive be applied to UEFI?
    GRUB can do this, but gummiboot can't. You set one of those (or something else, like rEFInd) as your primary boot manager. Using both GRUB and gummiboot adds unnecessary complexity, IMHO. OTOH, setting up multiple boot managers or boot loaders is possible, and can give you a fallback in case one fails. For instance, there's a known bug that affects 3.7 and later kernels, mostly on Lenovo computers, that causes the EFI stub loader to fail sometimes. Thus, if you use rEFInd, gummiboot, or the EFI's own boot manager to launch the kernel via the EFI stub loader, having GRUB, ELILO, or SYSLINUX set up as a fallback can provide helpful insurance in case a kernel upgrade causes your normal boot process to fail.
    3. Has anybody tried/succeeded/failed to dual-boot in this fashion before me, and if so what did they do?
    Many people dual-boot Windows and Linux under EFI. There are a huge number of possible solutions. My own Windows/Linux dual-boot system uses:
    rEFInd
    rEFInd's EFI filesystem drivers
    Linux kernels on Linux-native /boot partitions (two partitions, one for each of the two distributions installed on that computer)
    The Windows boot loader on the ESP
    This works well for me, but it wouldn't work with gummiboot instead of rEFInd, since gummiboot can't redirect the boot process to another partition. (gummiboot also can't automatically load filesystem drivers.) Arch Linux users who use gummiboot often mount the ESP at /boot, which enables gummiboot to easily launch the Linux kernel. Doing this with multiple Linux distributions would be awkward, though, since you'd end up with two distributions' kernels in the same directory.

  • Dual Boot Vista and Arch

    Hey, I am attempting to set up my laptop to dual boot Windows Vista and Arch Linux.
    The problem I'm having is after installing Arch my laptop still boots windows w/o going to the grub
    I started with having Windows Vista installed on the laptop, and then shrank down the partition with vista by 30 gigs for Arch.
    I was following the Arch setup guide in the wiki along with the Dual Boot Windows and Arch guide in the wiki [wiki]Windows_and_Arch_Dual_Boot[/wiki].
    My partitioning Scheme is:
    /dev/sda1    1.46 gb (some sort of toshiba recovery partition I believe)
    /dev/sda2    117.8 gb (Vista Partition)
    /dev/sda3    1 gb (Swap partition)
    /dev/sda4    29 gb /root partition
    According to the Dual Boot wiki article, I should install the grub to /boot, which in my case is in /root which I did.
    The thing that confuses me about this is if I install the grub to /boot how do I get the grub to boot before the windows MBR?
    Thanks in advanced

    Mclarenf1905 wrote:
    Hey, I am attempting to set up my laptop to dual boot Windows Vista and Arch Linux.
    The problem I'm having is after installing Arch my laptop still boots windows w/o going to the grub
    I started with having Windows Vista installed on the laptop, and then shrank down the partition with vista by 30 gigs for Arch.
    I was following the Arch setup guide in the wiki along with the Dual Boot Windows and Arch guide in the wiki [wiki]Windows_and_Arch_Dual_Boot[/wiki].
    My partitioning Scheme is:
    /dev/sda1    1.46 gb (some sort of toshiba recovery partition I believe)
    /dev/sda2    117.8 gb (Vista Partition)
    /dev/sda3    1 gb (Swap partition)
    /dev/sda4    29 gb /root partition
    According to the Dual Boot wiki article, I should install the grub to /boot, which in my case is in /root which I did.
    The thing that confuses me about this is if I install the grub to /boot how do I get the grub to boot before the windows MBR?
    Thanks in advanced
    It still works fine. It doesn't matter if its not in root directory. Others linux OSes  have their bootloaders in the same directory and it manages to boot just fine.

  • Dual boot windows 7 and solaris 11

    Hi Friends,
    Could some one please explain the steps to install dual boot windows 7 and solaris 11?
    Thanks
    Raja

    Install Windows leaving a partition for Solaris.  Install Solaris into the empty partition.  Reboot.  Use a partition manager if you need to shrink your current Windows Partition.  GParted works great and is free.
    alan

  • Dual Boot Windows 7 and solaris 10

    Can some body guide me how to dual boot windows 7 and solaris 10?
    Thanks

    First partition your harddisk with at least 2 primary partitions, one for windows and the other for solaris if you only have one harddisk. It would be a good idea to create an additional small boot partition as the first partition as well if you intend on using an independent boot loader but it really depends on what your machine is capable of. For example, if you have multiple harddisk and your BIOS supports it, then you could just install each OS onto its own harddisk and use the BIOS function to disable/boot off specific harddisk. Otherwise, if you only have one harddisk and created multiple partitions, install windows7 first followed by solaris10, obviously installing into different partitions. If you have created a boot partition, then you can install the boot loader into that dedicated partition.

  • Dual Boot Windows 7 and Arch with Shared NTFS partition.

    Hi everyone,
    I want to dual boot windows 7 and Arch Linux.
    Here's the problem... my hard drive isn't the biggest.  I want to store all my music, movies, pictures, and documents on partition that both linux and windows can access seamlessly.
    I want the partition to be NTFS.   -- (the programs that map an ext4 drive to Windows are trash).
    Here's what I think I need.
    30GB NTFS to Windows.
    30GB ext4 to Arch Linux
    The remainder (190ish GB) to Shared Data.
    I don't want the swap partition because I have a SSD and 4GB of RAM.
    What is the best way to setup my partitions?  And is this even possible?
    Thanks!

    Not a problem.  I would create:
    First of four primary partitions for windows.
    Second of four primary partitions for /boot
    Third of four partitions is an extended partition encompassing all the space not used by the first two partitions.
    Put everything else inside the extended partition.
    Mine is a bit more complicated, but this should give you an idea:
    ewaller@odin:~ 1005 %sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda
    Password:
    Disk /dev/sda: 320.1 GB, 320072933376 bytes
    255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38913 cylinders, total 625142448 sectors
    Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
    Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
    I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
    Disk identifier: 0x87b33479
    Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
    /dev/sda1 * 2048 121778159 60888056 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
    /dev/sda2 597366784 625135615 13884416 83 Linux
    /dev/sda3 121778160 597366783 237794312 5 Extended
    /dev/sda5 * 121778223 123770219 995998+ 83 Linux
    /dev/sda6 123770283 131770589 4000153+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris
    /dev/sda7 193213818 597360959 202073571 83 Linux
    /dev/sda8 131781258 193213754 30716248+ 83 Linux
    /dev/sda9 131770591 131781194 5302 1 FAT12
    Partition table entries are not in disk order
    ewaller@odin:~ 1006 %
    Partitions 1 and 2 are Primary partitions.  Partition 3 is an extended partition.  All the others live in partition 3

  • Y500 dual boot windows 8 and fedora 19 problem

    I bought a y500 two days ago and i wanted to dual boot windows 8 and fedora 19, so here's what i did
    1. downloaded fedora 19 (x64) iso from the fedora website.
    2.made a live USB using live usb creator.
    4.opened disk management utility and shrunk the c drive (windows 8 was installed here) by 100 gb and kept the 100gb unallocated.
    3. started the laptop with novo button, changed the bios config to boot from usb.
    4.installed fedora from usb, selecting the 100gb unallocated memory for installation
    5.restarted the laptop.
    now the problem is fedora works perfectly but when i try to boot windows 8, the following error is shown.
    windows failed to start
    file:\BOOT\BCD
    status: 0xc0000225
    info:the boot configuration data for your PC is missing or contains errors.
    i am guessing the fedora installation overwrote the boot files of windows and
     i have not taken a backup. please help

    hi,
    I have a Y500 and I wanted to dualboot fedora 19 with windows 8, this proved to be unsuccessful. I had made a repair disk before the process (but not a set of recovery disks unfortunately >.<   ). now I inserted the repair disk and selected the automatic repair option, it showed a message that auto recovery has failed.  now when I pressed the NOVO button and selected the system recovery option, it does not go into the OKR menu but continues with the normal booting process.  Can somebody guide me or give links where I can find step by step instructions to making OKR work and reset my laptop to factory settings? PLEASE help As Soon As Possible
    NOTE: I did resize the windows 8 os partition but the recovery and the lenovo partition are still untouched

  • Dual Boot Windows 8 and Linux?

    I have (UEFI System) an ASUS K55A UEFI motherboard laptop that came factory with Windows 8. I would like to install backtrack linux and Windows 8, but before I go screwing up my laptop, I want to see if this would be at all possible. I would use a virtual
    machine, but I need Backtrack Linux on a physical machine for testing purposes as I am taking a course in computer forensics, and I want to test cracking my home wi-fi. My processor is an Intel Core i5 2.5 ghz with a 500 GB HDD and 8GB DDR3 RAM. Any insight
    on this would be appreciated. Thank You.

    Hi,
    You can refer to this article to get detail information.
    http://apcmag.com/how-to-dual-boot-windows-8-and-linux.htm
    Niki Han
    TechNet Community Support

  • [SOLVED] Dual boot windows 7 and arch Linux with seperate hard drives

    Ok so I'm stuck trying to get my computer to dual boot windows 7 and arch. They are installed on different hard drives and I have grub 2 as the boot loader. I can't find any tutorials on how to do it with seperate hard drives I know how to do it if they are on the same hard drive. Also I want windows on the "first" hard drive how do I check to see which one it considers the first?
    Last edited by bdawg (2012-09-21 23:15:37)

    DSpider wrote:
    drobole wrote:If you want to change it so that sda becomes sdb and sdb becomes sda, you should be able to do that in BIOS.
    Not from the BIOS. He would need to physically open up the computer and switch the cables between them (or add another drive).
    There's no actual performance increase in changing this order. Performance increase is when you have the partitions as close to the beginning of a HDD as possible, where the platters spin faster (basic mechanics, not to be confused with CD/DVD, which are being written from the inside-out to prevent errors after extended usage), and it especially doesn't apply to SSDs whatsoever.
    You may be right about that. I remember I had to do this a while back but I probably switched the cables. It also messed up the drive mapping in Windows 98 if I remember correctly.

Maybe you are looking for