Dual Core Content to a Quad Core

What is the easiest way to take my Dual Core MacPro and transfer all my files to a Quad Core Mac Pro. I have a co-worker who has left and I was going to consolidate my Ram and files to his computer and build a super computer. There are some programs I have that he doesn't and I want to really want to take all my "guts" and put it in his body haha.
Thanks

You won't have any trouble with the documents - just remove the disk from one computer and put it in the other. Software, however, is a different thing: in most cases you can't just copy it from one computer to the other and you will have to install it. If you have Adobe software you must deauthorize the software first before you can reinstall it.

Similar Messages

  • 2 Dual core intel xeon vs quad core. Whats the difference??

    I came across someone who's selling his mac pro 1.1 (aprox 2-3 years old machine) which hosts 2 dual core intel xeon processors 2.66 Ghz (4 total cores) with an L2 cache of 4 MB per processor and 3 gb of RAM. He is asking for 1200.00
    I wonder:
    1. is there a significant difference between the machine described above and the new 2.66GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 3500 series processor machines Apple offers?
    2. Is 1200 a good deal considering its a 2-3 year old machine? how much would it cost me brand new?
    3. I am planning to purchase the machine to use Logic Pro 8 (considering to upgrade to 9) which I currently run on my mac book intel core duo 1.8 GHZ. Which of the two machines will be optimal for it?
    Thanks in advance for your time!

    Using the scores on the GeekBench site, I show that a Mac Pro 1,1 2.66GHz gets a score of 4544.
    http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/218641
    The Mac Pro 4,1 Quad Core 2.66GHz with all its Nehalem glory gets a score of 9256.
    http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/229504
    Benchmark tests versus real-world performance, along with your mileage, may vary. But that should give you an idea of what kind of what you're getting.

  • Should I go with a dual core or quad core MacBook?

    Hi all,
    I am going to be a college student this fall majoring in a science related field. My first question is what processor I should go with. I am looking at either a 13" MBP with a dual core i7 and 8 GB of RAM (750GB HD), 13" MBP w/ a dual core i5, 8GB RAM and 500GB HD, or a 15" quad core i7 with 8GB RAM and 500 GB HD. I plan on upgrading to a SSD once prices come down in a few years and would like to stick with the MBP without Retina Display so that I can upgrade RAM and HD later on.
    Will I see a noticeable difference between dual core i5 and i7? From what I have seen, it has not been much of a difference. I only plan to do light Photoshop and doubt I will do any video editing or even 3D modelling for the most part. This will mainly be used for research (web), streaming, and Office. I know that the i5 is more than capable of all of that, but I am looking to make this machine last 4+ years at least. That is why I am considering jumping up to the 15" MBP just to get the quad core and ensure that I will have a longer lasting machine.
    Most of the time the laptop will be travelling around, but I will also be plugging this into a Thunderbolt Display for more screen space.
    Let me know what you all think! Right now, I am leaning towards the 13" MBP with dual core i7, but this is subject to change. Will it last throughout college?
    Thanks,
    Sean

    seanbrownie wrote:
    Screen size set aside since I plan on using a TBD most of the time,
    Then you want the more powerful graphics of the 15" with it's dedicated GPU to better/faster drive the external display as it's larger, and larger displays pumps more pixels so you also need the better cooling of the 15"
    would adding more RAM solve the OS X upgrade issues over time?
    Yes, but more RAM isn't a cure all, processors and graphics also has to be powerful to last longer.
    RAM allows one to do more things at the same time, and gives a performance boot with programs with larger files it's working on (like large Photoshop and video files)
    Plus, would upgrading the HD to SSD help in making the jump to say OS X 10.11, 10.12 down the road easier?
    Not that much really, with the non-Retina 15" you can put in a 1TB SSD when the prices come down further
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100008120%2060041492 0&IsNodeId=1&name=513GB%20-%201TB
    It would be nice to save a little on the screen size since I won't be able to utilize the 15" to its maximum potential when I'm working at my desk.
    Your on the wrong platform if your looking to save money.
    If you compare specs and performance of the hardware Apple offers for sale and equivilent i5/dual cores with Intel HD graphics, you'll find for $1500 buys a Mac and for $400 buys the same in a Windows PC.
    Really the best value comes with the 15" as if your in that pro market for such a machine you might as well get OS X with it as PC's cost about the same in that range.
    The really best value is a Windows 7 tower, that way it's parts are all upgradable and can last a decade or more on one Widnows OS version.
    Several of my friends think I'm crazy spending $10,000 on Mac's in 10 years, they are still on their XP towers and haven't paid much more than $2000 over that same time.
    Of course now XP is dead and they have to upgrade to Windows 7 towers, but they really get good value out of their boxes.
    Mac's are not for those tight on a budget, I don't advise. A Windows machine will do the job for most people
    Perhaps a Windows 3D gaming tower and a iPad?

  • Dual core or Quad Core

    I know elements will run on a "Dual core or Quad Core" system, but will it use the "Dual core or Quad Core" feature

    Yes, the Editor will make good use of multiple processors, while the Organizer appears to make somewhat less use of multiple processors. PSE 7 has a severe bug with respect to raw files, but that's fixed in PSE 7.

  • Upgrading Zbook 15 From i5 4200m Dual Core to an i7 Quad Core; Is it possible?

    Hi. I have this laptop. Is it possible to replace the i5 dual processor with an i7 quad core? If so, I might upgrade. I am just not sure if the Zbook dual core laptop shares the same motherboard as a quad core. 
    Thanks much! 
    Gary
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Hi Gary
    Yes you're correct: you've to change out board for upgrading to Quad core processor. It's going to cost you much compared to price of the laptop.
    Manual (second one) - go through page 26, 27: http://h20565.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/manualsResults/?sp4ts.oid=538780...
    Documentation: http://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/default.aspx?cc=ca&lc=en&oid=7081970
    Regards
    Visruth
    ++Please click KUDOS / White thumb to say thanks
    ++Please click ACCEPT AS SOLUTION to help others, find this solution faster
    **I'm a Volunteer, I do not work for HP**

  • 13'' dual-core with 16gb ram vs 15'' quad-core 8gb ram -- ram vs cores?

    Hello.  I am at a point between choosing a 13'' dual-core i5 with 16gb ram vs the 15'' quad-core with 8gb ram - both retinas.
    I will be using photoshop and illustrator while uploading/downloading large files constantly.  After much headscratching I almost decided on the 13'' i5 because from my experience, RAM limitations is where I usually run into problems, and don't see the extra price of i7 worth it when it is still a dual-core.  For the same price I can get a 15'' quad, but will be stuck with 8gb ram.
    I don't care about the screen size, I have good eyes and the weigth trade-off makes this a non-issue.
    I'm thinking about down the road, as either of these I'm sure will be fine solutions.  I'm just wondering where does the edge really come in this case?  Ram or processor / cores?
    Thanks.

    Thanks for your reply tjk, of course with 16gb on the 15'' for $200 more  I'd have easier time, but in this case I am comparing a refurbished - the lowest 15'' 16gb I could find would cost $500 more, I just can't do it. 
    I should make clear that this particular comparison between 13''w/16 and 15''w/8, they are the same price (the 13 being new) - which is why I'm stuck.
    To rephrase - for the same price - which will I regret less in 4 years?
    As a side note, I can't believe I'm even thinking about paying this much money for something that is not upgradeable, but that's another discussion entirely.

  • Macbook pro, dual core or quad core?

    Hey guys Im getting an early college present and was wondering which Macbook I should look at. This will be my one and only computer while im in college. No photo editing or anything like that, maybe some video editing but it will be almost none. Will be used to surf the web and write documents. My question is should i get the dual core or quad core processor? Will it really matter for what i want it for? One thing I absolutely hate is lag! So the faster of the two the better.

    tony477g wrote:
    So if I went with the quadcore because you guys say it is faster than the 2.9 ghz dualcore. Would the difference be noticable between the 2.6 ghz and the 2.3 ghz? I noticed the 2.6 has 8 gb to the 4gb and 750gb to the 500 gb.
    Well, actually, only one guy said the quad core would be faster, but it is not clear why they said that. You said you were only going to use it "to surf the web and write documents." Well, guess what. You don't need a quad-core for that. You don't need a dual-core for that. I've surfed the web and written documents on my old single-core iPhone. Those tasks are just not that demanding.
    So unless there are more things you want to do that you haven't mentioned, there is just about no way it's worth paying for quad-core or a 2.6GHz processor if all you are going to do is surf the web and write documents.
    The quad-core is going to speed up operations that specifically benefit from parallel processing, like intensive editing of photo/audio/video, or bulk encoding of audio and video, or specific math apps, stuff like that. And most Mac users would not benefit from choosing the 2.6GHz over the 2.3GHz because the performance of so many common uses depends not only on the CPU speed, but actually on the overall balance of CPU, RAM, and disc. In other words, if you really have a legitimate application for 2.6GHz it usually means you must also install a great deal more RAM and also an SSD to avoid creating a bottleneck that holds back the CPU. But then you would have a machine that is massively overpowered and overpriced for surfing the web and writing documents.
    You could surf the web and write documents quite effectively on the least expensive MacBook that Apple sells. But since you do want to keep it throughout all of college, it is a good idea to buy something higher than the bottom of the line. For a Mac for very basic uses that should last four years, I would suggest:
    13-inch MacBook Air with 256GB SSD storage and 8GB RAM
    13-inch MacBook Pro with 500GB HD storage and 8GB RAM
    13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display with 256GB SSD storage and 8GB RAM
    (You didn't mention what your budget is)
    I suggested 13-inch because it's more portable than the 15-inch but more comfortable for 4 years than an 11-inch. I chose storage sizes that would be appropriate since you said you would do some video. And I chose 8GB RAM because 4GB may not be enough for 4 years, and also because insufficient RAM is often a bigger cause of lag than CPU or disk speed.
    If you have a limited amount of money, from this point on you'll need to justify why you would want a bigger screen, a faster CPU, or more cores given the two tasks you said you'd be doing most of the time. Because again, if you didn't actually need a Mac, you could write documents and surf the web on an iPad with the Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover and be done for $600.

  • All things being equal, does 4th gen quad core i7 (2.5GHz) need more RAM than 5th gen dual core i5 (2.7GHz) for same tasks?

    Bought mid/late 2014 15" MBPr with the i7 2.5GHz and 16GB RAM. I'm within 2 week exchange period at Best Buy, and thinking of switching to 2015 13" MBPr with i5 2.7GHz and 8GB RAM for battery life and weight, and they don't offer the upgraded 16GB RAM option for any 13" models.
    Needs to be Best Buy because of gift cards
    Use docked at office 75% of time vs 25% out of office, so portability and battery life are nice to have but not as important as if I had 8 hour flights on weekly basis
    See appeal of having 5th gen i5 in 13" vs my 4th gen i7 that will be updated this summer
    Not a gamer and don't use Final Cut or other video editing, but I tend to leave several applications open and usually have between 1-3 GB free RAM of the 16GB total at any time according to my Memory Cleaner readings
    Therefore, worried that 8GB is a non-starter as simple math says that I would have shortfall of 5-7GB RAM based on above readings, but wondering if dual core i5 will use RAM more efficiently than quad core i7
    Any help greatly appreciated!

    Also to note, would like this to last 4 years, which was reason that I bought the higher spec'd model even though I don't run games or video editing

  • How can I tell if I have an i7 dual core or quad core processor?

    I just got my brand new (2011 refurbished) MacBook Pro yesterday and it is slow and choppy right out of the box. I checked the "About This Mac" screen and it says I have the "2.2 GHz Intel Core i7". It says nothing about "dual core" or "quad core". I thought I was buying a quad core, but now I'm starting to wonder exactly what I bought.
    Does anyone have any insight on this?
    Thanks,
    Matt
    Chicago, IL

    You have a quad core.
    Number of Cores: 4
    Regards,
    Captfred

  • Dual-core or Quad-core for Premiere, After Effects, and Photoshop CS4?

    We are planning to purchase around 25 computers for a computer lab for working with CS4 Production Premium at the high school level.  Mainly Premiere Pro, After Effects, and Photoshop.  Our budget is, unfortunately, a mere $550-$625 per machine (just the tower though, we have monitors).  I've already established that a 64-bit operating system makes a significant difference in the performance, even though Photoshop is the only 64-bit application, and I'm now hung up on whether or not it's worth the cost of a quad-core processor over a dual-core.
    I'm discovering the different hardware needs for each application, so I'm trying to find an economic balance that will give me the best performance per buck.  It seems that Premiere benefits significantly from more cores (we're editing 1440x1080 AVCHD), and this article over at Tom's Hardware has convinced me that I don't want to compromise with a hyperthreaded dual-core for After Effects.
    I'm also struggling with what part the graphics card plays in the mix.  Which applications lean on the graphics card, and will it make much difference as long as I meet the requirements (OpenGL 2.0, Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D 10, and 256 Mb Ram)?
    I understand I will need to settle for less-than-awesome with my budget, but I'm already making sacrifices to get the number to $625.  I would like to make sure that those sacrifices will be worth it for a quad-core system.

    I think I may have answered my own question by looking at these charts over at Tom's Hardware:
    http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2009-desktop-cpu-charts-update-1/Adobe-Premiere-Pro-CS4 ,1404.html
    http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2009-desktop-cpu-charts-update-1/Adobe-Photoshop-CS-4,1 387.html
    http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/desktop-cpu-charts-2010/Video-Editing-Adobe-After-Effec ts-CS5,2427.html
    I  think that the jump to the quad core in Premiere Pro is worth it, even if I  don't see as large of an improvement in Photoshop or After Effects.  I am still interested in the role of the graphics card in the mix if anyone can shed some light on that.  Will an integrated graphics card (like an Intel GMA x4500 or Radeon HD4200) suffice or will I need an actual graphics card to realize the benefits?
    Thanks

  • Dual core versus quad core?

    Is there a noticeable difference in speed when comparing a dual core versus a quad core iMac where the advertised speeds are essentially the same, say -- 2.7 ghz CPUs, both running the latest Mac OS 10.82, and iLife, iWork, or MS Office suite programs for MAC?

    Chances are for the type of work you're doing an i7 iMac would be a complete waste of money. Where  you may benefit is 5 years from now if your work flow changes a lot where you use apps that draw on the power of an i7. However  none of can look into a crystal ball and decide today what we will need years down the road so if you want to bet safe, buy as much as you can afford.

  • MacBook Pro Retina 13" - Can i upgrade the dual-core i7 to quad-core i7 CPU?

    MacBook Pro Retina 13" - Can i upgrade the dual-core i7 to quad-core i7 CPU?  (obviously not talking about BTO, but about "self-service" upgrade ...)

    Yeah it is soldered. So no upgrade possible. Found here: http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook_pro/macbook-pro-retina-display-faq /macbook-pro-retina-display-processor-ram-expansion-slots.html
    Thanks Jon P D !

  • Mac Mini dual core or Mac Mini quad core server for normal use ?

    Hello
    I am looking to replace my desktop work computer from my 2011 i7 quad core 2.0 MBP for a Mac Mini because it was actually made for desktop use and my minidisplayport - dvi adaptor just broke ( I think because to many unplugs and plugs from the laptop to the monitor ) .
    I work in Photoshop, Dreamweaver, Aptana, Netbeans, open 20 + tabs in chrome, firefox so I need a bit of performance
    I have no use for Mac OSX Server, I just want to be at least as fast as my MBP. I can see that the 999$ Mac mini has the same processor as my MBP ( 2.0GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 ) but no dedicated video card. Also, the 800$ Mac mini has a video card BUT just a dual core - 2.5GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 .
    What do you think I should get ? I don't play games, I have windows for that anyway. Would the dedicated video card make much of a difference ? ( does photoshop or mac use it much - openCL etc. )
    Thanks!

    You might also consider the Apple only available Mini
    which has a 2.7 GHz i7 dual core which has dedicated
    graphics. Also, all the 2011 i7 processors (Sandy Bridge)
    are hyperthreading.
    As for dedicated graphics, they are really only needed
    for high end gaming or 3D rendering apps.  It will
    make no difference with the software that you mention,
    as they are more CPU intensive.

  • Should i Take the more expensive Mac mini (quad core) or dual core

    Hey guys!
    I don't now if I should take the Mac mini with dual core or quad core
    I have never had a Mac so I don't now if the quad core (200$ more) is better than the dual core  :o
    I use it only for standard things (email, web, twitter Mac App Store games)
    But it also should not stuck at bit more powerful apps and run crystal clear !!!
    I want to have the Mac mini for few years !
    Thanks now!

    The difference in real performance between dual core
    and quad core machines is highly dependent on the
    apps one uses and how many at the same time.
    If you really only ever have one or perhaps two apps
    open at once and if these apps are like web browsers
    or email, you may never really notice a difference.
    However, if you have many apps open at once or use
    apps that can utilize many cores at the same time (typically
    imaging and video apps), then there will be a significant
    performance increase.
    As far as gaming, by and large the most significant impact
    on game performance is the graphics processing unit (GPU).
    The integrated Intel HD4000 GPU in the Minis can typically
    handle mid range games but will struggle on the very highend
    games.
    Also, if apps are not designed for mutiple core usage, there will be
    now real improvement between 2 or 4 core machines.  As a matter
    of fact, I have a few apps that are faster on my MBP 13" 2.7 GHz
    2 core i7 than on my quad core i7 2.0 GHz Mini Server for this
    very reason.
    So, the bottom line is that for some a quad core machine will
    blow away a dual core machine while for others, there will be
    no noticable difference.

  • Mac Pro 1,1 (2006) Upgrade from Dual-Core to Quad (or more)

    Sorry if posted before, was unable to find anything. Is it possible to upgrade a Mac Pro 1,1 (2006) Upgrade from Dual-Core to Quad-Core (or more)? If it is, would you mind providing a bit of info on what I would need to do this.
    Many thanks.

    Do some Google searching and visit XLR8YourMac.

Maybe you are looking for