Dual Powermac G5 vs Mac mini Intel Duo

I'm sure this has been discussed already, but I would some more input on this.
I am looking to upgrade to a faster Mac. I am currently running a G4 1.25 DP with 2Gigs of RAM. It's a fine machine, but I would like to take advantage of some of Apple's more powerful units. Anyway, I am considerering a Dual Processor 2.0 G5 Powermac with about 2.5 to 4gigs of RAM, or my other choice is one of the new Mac mini Intel Core Duo models with RAM maxed and a faster larger HD.
My question is--what machine would give me a better performance running Universal Apps, such as Logic, Soundtrack Pro, ect...? Obviously, the Apples are all going to way of the Intel and I have been hearing great things about the new Intels. The Mac-mini has limited expandabiltiy and one Firewire port, but runs Intel. What to do? I may consider the Imac G5 core duo as well.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks, Randy

well here' my experience...
i recently sold a dual 1.8 G5 with 2GB RAM. reason being simply to get rid of it while it was still worth something. on top of that, it was really large, loud and put out a ton of heat. i bought the Core Duo mini with a GB of RAM as a sort of temporary machine until the next Intel "Pro" towers come out. i've been using it for about a month now for Logic Pro, GarageBand, Ableton Live and Reason and soon my SoudTrack Pro Universal disks will be here as well. i was really concerned that the system would feel slow coming from the G5 but i can totally recommend this machine with confidence as it feel and performs as fast as (and sometimes faster than) by dual G5. i'm talking when using Universal binaries of course. these Intels are fast. the mini is a silent, snappy little machine. there are a few things i miss that will eventually prompt me to buy a tower such as:
limited internal storage options - i believe the largest 7200RPM hard disk you can put in the mini is the 100GB from Seagate. of course, external Firewire and USB storage is always an option.
the limited graphics card could be an issue for some. it doesn't seem to directly affect audio performance but just knowing that it's using your hard RAM is a bit unsettling.
i miss FireWire 800, even though the G5 had serious slow-down issues when writing to fw800.
i miss using two displays.
having said all that; the speed, quietness and cool running temperature of this mini is enough to outweigh any negatives. i notice zero speed decrease from the dual g5 and cost me about a third of the price. it will make a great temporary workstation for me and when the next towers come out it will make a great livingroom entertainment system and perform node duties over gigabit ethernet. don't hesitate. it's a great system.

Similar Messages

"self-installation" of memory in Mac Mini Intel Duo 1.66

I am using a Mac Mini Intel Duo 1.66/512 memory at present and as obvious for anyone with this machine it requires more memory.
I am considering buying 2GB of"Crucial" memory, which they advertise as"self-installable" in 15 minutes.
Is it really viable for one to do this himself?
An Apple dealership is quite inconvinient for me, so this, at this point, is my only way of upgrading.
Caleb

If you do it yourself watch the video then consider a couple of things:
1) Use a card, putty knife, taping knife, or whatever at the same time on both sides. You'll notice the retaining clips drop down or re-attach a few times in the video. That's just not worth it. Get both sides out at the same time, but:
a) don't break the tabs
b) try (if you care) to not mar the METAL.
2) I don't know if you caught it in the video, but the trick is to load both the memory modules into the slots and THEN press the slots down. It seems counter-intuitive, but once you see how it works you'll get the idea.
Then there's the 'little black cable' in the front. IIRC it's the fan controller. BEFORE you disconnect it look at how it re-connects. It's slotted, but it's a little bit of pain.
If your machine is the new duo 1.66 vs the old top end duo 1.66 it probably will look at bit different than what was shown. There might be caps above the airport card. If you look under it (ok antenna) you'll see two vertical bars. Pinching these together releases the unit. Pay attention to where the wire is routed, as it's...well...just a little odd when you think about it.
Is it worth doing? If an Apple store isn't an option or you're stubborn, or just enjoy working on machines then yes. If it's about saving $35 installation fee and a couple of hours w/o your machine then I'd say no.
If you break something you will void your warranty for that part and anything directly affected by the damage caused to that part (or if you live somewhere w/o halfway decent consumer remedies you might just void the whole thing by thinking about opening it so check you local rights regarding this matter). If you've seen repair sheets from Apple you know how much components cost so don't break anything or be prepared to live w/ it.
Finally...and I couldn't watch all of that video...if it gets to testing the machine BEFORE re-assembing the case you might want to consider what will probably happen: You MIGHT knock out 802.11 service around you because a normally shielded antenna is now free and is a nice and potent emitor. If you live in a densly populated area then be considerate, get it all right the first time and put it back together (or test it in the basement if you're smart).
Good Luck,
-j

Mac Mini Intel Duo or Imac g5

I have an imac g5 with that lovely logic board problem and a fan that is on 24/7 that sounds like a rocket. It has 1.5 gig of ram in it right now. I am thinking of getting rid of the imac and purchasing an intel mac mini duo with about 1 gig of ram. Would the mini stand up to my imac g5 as far as speed and using programs? I will only use photoshop cs 2 (which i know runs under rosetta)so I know it might be slower in that program.. how much slower are we talking about? Does it take a couple minutes to finish a task? I'm just doing web graphics so nothing major like 3d or anything like that. I am thinking of purchasing a 20" display as well. Any thoughts on if I should wait until the mini gets a speed bump or just keep what I have?
iMac G5 Mac OS X (10.4.3) 1.5 gig RAM

I did the same, switched from a iMac G5 20" 1.8 GHz and 1.2 GB RAM to a Mac mini Core Duo 1.66 with 2 Gig RAM witch a 23" CD.
For me the Mac mini is quite faster then the iMac. Universal Binary Programms are as fast or faster as on the iMac. I only have a small amount of not so much used PowerPC Programms which are not available as Universal Binaries today (one of the is Photoshop Elements 4 and Office 2004). Office runs very well for me. Photoshop is slower as on the iMac. I do not make difficult stuff in Photoshop so Performance is for me still ok, but if you work the whole day with it I would wait for a UB Version.
Something which I will change soon is the 5400rpm Harddisk, when doing a lot of Disk I/O (copying Files, backup etc.) it's slower than in the iMac. I probably will change it to a faster 7200rpm HD.
Overall I'm impressed from the Mac mini and the change was a success because I have one Windows Programm which I need daily and that was a pain in Virtual PC. Now with Parallels Desktop it works like a charm.
Regards,
Stefan
Mac mini Core Duo 1.66GHz 2 GB RAM/80GB HD/SD Mac OS X (10.4.6) Apple 23" Cinema HD Display; iPod mini 2GB; iPod Shuffle 1GB; Airport Express
Mac mini Core Duo 1.66GHz 2 GB RAM/80GB HD/SD Mac OS X (10.4.6) Apple 23" Cinema HD Display; iPod mini 2GB; iPod Shuffle 1GB; Airport Express

Mac Mini Intel Duo - Quartz Composer - Unsupported Configuration ?

Hello Group,
Mac Mini Intel Core Duo 1.66 with 1GB RAM
I cant seem to be able to get Quartz Composer to open a qtz file. When I try to open the RSS visualizer screen saver file, Quartz tries to open iot, and then displays a message saying that I need an Nvidia or ATI card and 16mB of VRAM or more.
System profiler doesnt have any info on graphics/displays below the display line on the roght side.
This Mini is accessed using Remote Desktop/VNC/SSH only.
It does not have a monitor attached (only the DVI-VGA adapter is attached).
Would this be the reason Quartz Composer will not open the qtz files ?
Thanks in advance.
Mini Intel Core Duo 1.66 1GB RAM Mac OS X (10.4.6)

http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303470
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=2106560&#2106560

Upgrade to OS 10.4 with SW coming from new Mac Mini (Intel duo core)

Is it possible to upgrade my G4 PowerBook to the latest OS 10.4 and iLife06 with the SW provided and installed on new Mac Mini's with the Intel duo core? That would make purchasing a new Mac Mini a sweeter deal.

No.
The disks that come with new machines are specific to that machine.
You will need Tiger and iLife '06 if you want to upgrade your PowerBook.
Regards,
Colin R.

Need RAM Installation Instructions for mac mini intel duo core

I just purchased two gig of ram for my intel duo core mac mini and cannot figure out how to install. I was able to get the cover off - but where does the RAM go?
I can't find any instructions on the apple support page for the mac mini.
All of the links in discussion board that I found are for instructions on installing ram on single processor mac mini which uses different type of ram and is installed in diff location.
Any help greatly appreciated.

I found a video here at owc: http://eshop.macsales.com/tech_center/index.cfm?page=Video/mini/intel/high.html

Mac Mini Intel Duo Core - locking up

I have a Mac Mini w/Intel Duo 1gb ram, top of the line. Today 5/14/06 was the second time I had to basically rebuild it as it quit working. The mouse cursor would move but it will not activate anything. But today I was asked to erase the HD and rebuild it from the get go. Now I reloaded my iPhoto library and it more than doubled the photo library, now I have to pain stakingly remove duplicate photos.
IMO, Apple made a major mistake going to Intel Processors, their commerical with the two guys and the PC guys restaring all the time, to my this is what is happening to my Intel Mini.
So, Intel processor MACs are big problems coming.

No… these problems aren't typical although there have been a large number of Intel Mac users who have had problems with the most recent Security Update 2006-003. If yyou have installed this update and are still having problems you might want to check out the MacFixIt web site…
http://www.macfixit.com/
I had to revert to an older, fortunately only 1 day older, clone of my hard disk after installing this update. I have chosen not to reinstall this update for obvious reasons.

Intel Mac Mini Core Duo Midi USB Issues

Is anyone else having issues getting Midi devices to work with the Intel Mac Mini's? I have several Midi devices that are't working correctly event though I have installed the newest drivers.
Currently I am having issues with a M-Audio Midisport 2x2 USB adapter. I loaded the newest drivers (ver 3.2.2) which are supposed to be universal binary to support the Intel Macs. When I connect the Midisport 2x2 to the Mac Mini I can not get it to receive Midi Output from the Mac.
When I look in the Midi control pannel I can see that the Midisport has been installed, but all options to select it are greyed out. Also when I try to select it as the input or output there is NO option to select the Midisport from the pull down menu. It only shows the "Built-in Midi" as and option.
The Midisport works fine on other non-Intel Macs. Please advise.
Thanks!
Mac Mini Intel Duo Core 1.66Ghz Mac OS X (10.4.7)

It seems like the mini is doing alright so far. I think maybe the full erase solved whatever issue it was having. I also got my Core Duo Mini yesterday in the mail and it's performing like a champ. Definitely a nice machine.
I'll close my question for now, since the Core Solo Mini seems alright. But, as a warning don't get on Front Row's bad side. I tried force quitting it because it was taking too long to load the videos folder and then tried shutting down from a terminal and ended up having to turn the machine off.

Brand New Mac Mini (Intel 2.53 320HD 4gb - January 2010 - new Airpot Extrem

I purchased a new Mac Mini Intel Duo 2.53 320HD 4gb and a new Airport Extreme, new iWorks, wireless Mouse and keyboard, ipod touch 8gig and have a iphone 3gs 16g already few months old. My Mac Mini keeps trying to install something in System/Library/CoreServices and halts permission check until Disk Utility saying that it has been altered and will not repair. I did notice in that directory everything about Apple Remote Desktop, including ARDAgent / AppleVNCServer.bundle which contains curtainlock, kickstart, remote desktop.incs, RemoteDeskoptAgent, lock.jpg, networkUser.tiff, Lockscreen, lockscreekLeopard386, VNC Gues, sshHelper, writesettings, VNC PrivilageProxy, AppleVNCServer, Screensharing, Upgrade User, UserAccountUpdate, WorkflowServerRunner, Ticket Viewer and so on. My new Apple Extreme Dual Band, paid $179 for it, shows another base station when trying to re-set to factory settings that doesnt match mine, and I have no other apple stuff in my apartment. Also, before I can even enter the password and set it up, the Amber solid light turns green, and thanks me at the end for setting up my wireless with a usb printer. I don't have, nor ever setup a printer, no in my sharing, and under Airport at the top of my screen listing all the networks in my area also has a second section listed Devices - and it shows a hpsetup under my computer's airport.
Would buying techtools deluxe help fix this problem? Or norton Security for mac? or use the PGP Corporation Whole Desktop security Apple recommends to encrypt everything and re-install my operating system after I do a full erase with a one zero clean on both empty and disk02 - Machintosh HD?
Also my iphone 3gs is acting strange. It says the AT&T firmware is 5.11.7 and 3.1.2 (7D11) but the actual model number has changed from whatever M..L/A to now just M...LL (no /A).
Thanks for any help.
Rick
[email protected]

Actually, he has 2GB of RAM and a 2.26 GHz processor.
I'd suggest trying it. Worst thing that could happen is your system is too sluggish to use, in which case you reformat the partition (or remove if you want) and install a different, more compatible version of Windows. But personally, I could see it working well for you. However, if you're using an Apple Wireless keyboard and Mighty/Magic Mouse, you may run into some problems with pairing, however, this is a Boot Camp driver problem and can be fixed fairly easily.
I can't see it creating any problems, I'm running Windows 7 32 bit on my Mac mini with only 1GB Ram and a 1.66 GHz processor. And it's running really smooth. I should also note that Windows 7 uses far less resources than Vista, thus it runs a little better on slower machines than Vista did.

Logitech headset Skype and Mac Mini Intel

Hi,
I own a Powerbook G4 and a new Mac Mini Intel Duo Core.
Both machines run the same latest OSX version 10.4.6.
On the Mac Mini I have a problem using Skype with my Logitech Headset 350 (usb). The system does recognize the headset, but for some reason the microphone of the headset is not working. The speakers work fine. I did set the prefrences right in the Skype menu.
But on my Powerbook G4 the headset works perfectly fine.
Could this be an Intel issue? Maybe I a driver (can't find one on the Logitech site)? Anyone any clue?
Thanks, Fred
Mac Mini Intel Core Duo 1.66 Mac OS X (10.4.6) 1280 MB ram

On the Mac Mini I have a problem using Skype with my
Logitech Headset 350 (usb). The system does recognize
the headset, but for some reason the microphone of
the headset is not working. The speakers work fine. I
did set the prefrences right in the Skype menu.
I have the same headset and it works fine. First, directly connect it to your mini, don't use the keyboard's USB hub since it can only drive 100mA devices. Second, check that the mic is actually on (the blue LED is constantly on, not flashing).
If it still doesn't work go to System Preferences->Sound->Input then select the "USB Headset" and speak into the mic and watch the input level meter. If necessary adjust the "Input Volume".
Mac Mini Mac OS X (10.4.6) Core Duo / 2GB

Mac mini Intel Updated to 10.4.10 - Won't boot if Airport turned on

Just updated my Mini to 10.4.10. I have two locations set up - one wired, and one wireless. If the location is set to use Airport, the machine will not boot. It may get to the desktop, but usually hangs before the dock makes it onto the screen. I need to do a Safe Boot, and change the location back to Wired for it to boot. After that, it works perfectly fine until I try wireless again, resulting in the same problem. Taking cues from some of the threads here, I downloaded and applied the Combo update, but it didn't help. It worked just fine under 10.4.9, and is completely reproduceable under 10.4.10. I tried turning off my Linksys wireless router to see if talking to it was giving Airport trouble, but even with the router powered off, the mini still hangs.
Saw some other threads about people having difficulties after 10.4.10 using HDMI to an HDTV, which I am also using, so maybe there's some combination of DVI->HDMI monitor and Airport???
Mac Mini (Intel Duo) Mac OS X (10.4.10) DVI->HDMI->Vizio GV47L HDTV

Curiously, of the 3 users I have with Intel minis who updated to 10.4.10, none have boot problems with Airport enabled. None are using any unusual adapters etc, but the systems are behaving correctly none-the-less.
However, there are obviously some users who do have problems, and just to be clear, since this is a user-to-user support forum, Apple do NOT read these threads. Well, to be more accurate, the forum hosts do, but solely from the standpoint of 'policing' content, and from time to time other staffers may, though not for the purpose of identifying technical issues. It is expected that users wishing to report a problem contact Apple directly to do so, and for all those suffering this anomaly (and others like it should they occur) it cannot be stressed too much that if the answer cannot be found here from another user, contacting Apple directly to make them aware of the problem is the best way forward.
In many instances, these issues turn out to be caused by issues that already pre-existed in the system before an update was installed, but in other instances where there is a genuine issue with an update and a specific piece of hardware or software or in certain operating circumstances, often the only way Apple will know is if users report it to them directly so they can then examine the details of each reported case to help identify the cause and then release a fix if it is necessary.
A useful resource for reporting and troubleshooting issues like these is http://www.macfixit.com/ though it's interesting to note that they don't seem to indicate this particular issue has been reported to them. They do, however, have a comprehensive guide on reinstalling MacOS at http://www.macfixit.com/article.php?story=20070709083546267 for those who want to downgrade from 10.4.10

Mac mini Intel Core Duo fan very loud and runs at high speed all the time.

I purchased an "Open box" Mac mini Intel Core Duo, 1.66Ghz, 2G ram, 80G HD and SD a few days ago from Fry's.
It runs beautifully except the fan is very loud compared to any Mac my family has ever had. It is so loud that we were thinking of putting it under the desk.
The fan runs constantly, and I mean all the time, at a high speed. You can really feel the air coming out the exhaust vents. The case is always cool to the touch as is the exhaust air.
My aunt bought a similar Mac mini (But only 512Mb ram) the same day. Her's is very quiet. The case feels just slightly warm, not unlike other Mac mini's I've seen.
Should my Mac mini's fan be running this way?
Thanks,
llulua
BTW: The "open box" was sealed with a Fry's label and it said that this had a new warranty. Yet, checking the serial number, it said that it had about 260 days left. I guess Fry's is backing it?
Also, someone told me that perhaps the main wire from the fan to the logic board is disconnected.
eMac 1Ghz, iBook 500 dual usb, Mac mini 1.66Ghz Intel Core Duo 2g ram Mac OS X (10.4.8)
eMac 1Ghz, iBook 500 dual usb, Mac mini 1.66Ghz Intel Core Duo 2g ram Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Since you have 2 gigs of memory, my thoughts are that when the party (Fry's or the origianl purchaser) upgraded the memory, they neglected to reattach the wire at the front of the Mini under the IR receptor at the right front corner that regulates the fan speed. This wire must be unattached in order to upgrade the memory, and is probably why the original person brought it back, because of the fan noise resulting from failing to reattach the wire. If that wire is left unattached, the fan runs continually at high speed to protect the CPU and system in general. If you do not want to use a putty knife to open the Mini, take it back to Fry's and ask someone who is Mac savvy to open it and reattach the small plastic receptacle at the end of the wire into its socket at the right front of the machine. When I go to Fry's, I am always concerned because the employees allow people to pry keys off of the Apple notebooks, so don't expect that their employees to know or care about anything Mac.
Al PB 12" 1.5 Mac OS X (10.4.5)

Mac Mini Core Duo 1.83 vs. Dual 450 G4

So I know somebody selling a Mac Mini Core Duo 1.83 for $200. My current machine is a Dual 450 G4. Would the Mini be a faster machine? I know it seems like a stupid question, but the Mini has been maligned because of its Integrated Graphics (my g4 450 dualie has a Radeon 8500 with 64 megs dedicated). I mostly use my machine for Photoshop, Indesign, music production and light video work.
I'd have to bump up the Mini's ram (it's only got 512 mb); my g4 has 1.75gigs of ram. Other than hat, would the Mini seem like a faster machine?
Opinions?

VRAM≠more performance.
I didn't say it did.
Integrated graphics steal from the main system memory and resources, so they shouldn't be considered when doing amateur or professional editing software.
It's true that on-board graphics use main RAM, thus removing 64Mb of memory from availability to the system, but out of a total of 2Gb, or potentially 3.3Gb on a C2D model, that is hardly a factor. It must also be said that while dedicated VRAM is a better bet for absolute performance, sharing high speed main RAM is also rather better than much slower VRAM on dedicated video cards such as the 8500 mentioned previously.
As to whether the presence of shared RAM rather than dedicated RAM should exclude a system from consideration when doing 'amateur or professional editing', I'd say that depends on the user, and that user's genuine need. Nothing, in the world of purchasing decisions, should be excluded until it is known to be unsuited for any of the reasons an individual might have. Given there would appear to be many people using Mac minis for tasks including video and image editing (including myself), it would seem clear that at some level these systems are perfectly suited to the task.
His Dual G4 has 1.7GB of RAM, a lot more than what the mini has—512MB.
Current Mac minis don't come with 512Mb RAM, and can be expanded to 4Gb (of which 3.3 is usable to the system).
The only category in which the mini wins is in CPU.
Actually not. Just about everything in a Mac mini is faster, not least bus and RAM speed. The only aspect in which there is parity is in the 5400rpm internal drive that both systems come with as standard.
That is not to say the G4 doesn't have advantages, as I have mentioned before it. It is far more expandable, with additional internal drive bays and where it is almost child's play to fit a fast internal, a better burner, more RAM an Airport card (though 802.11b only of course, not 802.11g) and even replace the CPU. The G4 is a true (and venerable) workhorse. Mine is still in service after almost 10 years and remains a favorite 'go to' system. What it is not, however, is fast.
Isn't it kind of obvious that if the person is using the Dual G4 for editing, he has PPC versions that run fast on his machine? That brings up another thing: If he were to use the software on his Dual G4 on a Mac mini, there'd be no benefits because, as you know, it'll run on Rosetta, which means that it'll run a lot slower than an Intel Application because it's being emulated.
Actually, as long as there is sufficient RAM, PPC apps will run as well, or faster, on an Intel system of sufficient speed differential, and your argument pre-supposes that the user is based on dated versions of applications which are not Intel-native, or cannot be readily up/cross-graded. At some point, a serious user has to consider that, even if not planning on a new purchase, since systems fail and need to be replaced, even if not always planned. At least buying into the Intel platform ensures forward compatibility and the ability to plan for future needs. To me, that's a critical part of using any system for anything other than simple pleasure.
Anyway, I have no intention to debate you on this - merely counter the point of view you expressed, which I believe to be somewhat misleading, and which directly counters my practical experience of running these applications on systems based on the same architectures the OP was discussing as options. As such, I remain certain that in every practical respect, excepting hard drive data access speed where the DP 450 has at least the ready ability to use 7200rpm internals, an Intel mini will outperform the G4 system in these broad uses. In my experience, the difference is notable.
Since the OP has your view, and mine, he or she is able to make an informed choice.

Hitachi PJ-TX300 projector and Mac Mini Intel Core 2 Duo?

My PJ-TX300 projector is hooked up via its PC connector to my Mac Mini Intel Core 2 Duo, via a DVI to VGA adapter (which came with the Mini from Apple) plugged into the Mac mini. I cannot get a clear screen picture at any resolution: there is always ghosting. Can you advise me?

Ghosting would typically implicate the video cable. Where did you get it? It sounds like you may have a very cheaply constructed VGA cable and a better one is needed.

Dualdisc cd side won't play on my mac mini intel core duo w Superdrive

Shakira Fijacion Oral DualDisc "CD" side will insert and then automatically reject from my Mac Mini - Intel Core Duo. The DVD side plays fine. Unfortunately iTunes not smart enough to work with DVD side. There is a query in IPOD forum about Springsteen DualDisc also failing on intel mini mac that is listed at "answered" but for the life of me, I can't tell if you are supposed to just not buy DualDisc or else take the Mac Mini back for a new drive.
mac mini (intel core duo) Mac OS X (10.4.7) 2GB RAM

Mac Mini Intel Core Duo's did not ship until 2006 which seems plenty of time for Apple to announce 'we have a problem' and what their recommended solution.
Why would they do that ? I mean, they don't have a problem. The inventors of DualDisc made a type of disc that won't play in all players, and Apple can't really do anything about it. Superdrives are not made by Apple, it's just Apple's name for a DVD burner; the Superdrives that are found in various Macs come from several different manufacturers, and although Apple probably ensures that the Superdrive and the Mac work well together, they won't test whether it works with each type of disc (usually, the manufacturer will).
However, that is probably limited to redbook/standards-compliant discs; since a DualDisc's CD side doesn't comply with any standard other than "DualDisc", and because it is not considered important enough to be officially supported by most (if not all) manufacturers, they probably won't test them since they're bound to get mixed results anyway.
Similarly I don't remember seeing a "strictly redbook only" disclaimer on any of the media available from Apple describing the capabilities of its Superdrive when I was making my mac mini buying decision.
You didn't see one because it is not required. Asking that Apple (or any other company) warns you that their players won't play non-redbook CDs is a bit like asking that they tell you everything your optical drive won't play. Apple claims that their Superdrives will read CD-R/RW, DVD-R/RW, DVD+R/RW, DVD-R DL, which aren't only a bunch of weird-looking letters, but also correspond to a standard. When you see a CD logo on a drive, it means that it will play redbook-compliant CDs. Your Dell player simply does more that what it is supposedly capable of, but because one (or many) optical drives will play DualDisc doesn't mean that they all have to.

Dual Powermac G5 vs Mac mini Intel Duo

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for