Duct Fabrication Scenario mapping in PP

Dear All,
I am relatively new to PP module.
We have a little pecular scenario in the project, I do not know can it be possible in SAP. Just go through & suggest.
They have a Project for AC System- It has supply of AC Units, Electrical Panel, Ducting etc..
All other items are bought out items except ducting. For one project they make ducting in peices like..
Straight Duct 30 x 40 X 100    - 5 Nos
Straight Duct 40 x 40 x 90     - 10 Nos
Elbow           40 x 40 x 90°    - 6 nos.... and so on around 50-60 items per one Project.
Actually the duct peices do not come as BOM but are derived from the drawing using a 3rd Party software.
Now they need one Production Order with details of all these items to be frabricated with dimensions & the required materials for them.
Required material for each item is the BOM, also are planning to use Variant Configuration.
But as per standard each item will become an Production Order. Client does not want this as each item takes hardly 15-20 mins to be made.
Please suggest a solution.
Regards,
MLN Prasad
Edited by: M.L.N.Prasad on Apr 20, 2011 11:12 AM

Dear All,
I am treating the products as Operations which will be entered manually after creation of Production Order.
Closing the thread.
Regards,
MLN Prasad

Similar Messages

Scenario mapping - help required

Scenario:
A Customer sends a material (for e.g., SUGARCANE) to the company (SAP Implementing). It processes it and send back as SUGAR.
The customer is charged for the services rendered.
The stock of sugarcane/sugar should be visible in the system.
Please guide me how to map this scenario.
I will be very much grateful.
Regards,
Anbu

This sales process is referred as Job Work in SAP.
Refer following SDN thread that can be helpful to you in understanding / reference:
- Sales Process of JOB WORK
If in case you have any concern or doubt about the process, do revert back.
But don't forget to put a effort search more information on JOB WORK for reference/understanding. So that you can specific to your requirement.
Regards
JP

Idoc File to File scenario mapping problem

Dear All,
I am working on File to File scenario in which my source xml file is having multiple deliveries Idoc structure to which I want to convert into output structure as required.
In my source file there is possibility that there can be multiple delivery idocs for the same delivery number so i want to pick all the data for the unique deliveries and if same delivery number repeats then the delivery created last should only be picked without considering others.
Please guide me in mapping this scenario.
Regards,
NJ

Hi,
Use the below UDF.
Set set = new HashSet(Arrays.asList(var1));
String[] array2 = (String[])(set.toArray(new String[set.size()]));
Arrays.sort(array2);
for (int i = 0; i < array2.length; i++) {
result.addValue(array2);
Map like below:
source fieldremove contextUDF--Target(delivery number )
Regards,
Prakasu.M
Edited by: prakasu on Jun 2, 2009 6:43 PM

PP Scenario Mapping help Needed

Hi Guys
Can anyone please help to map the following scenario?
Scenario: SAP PP
Product: Ingot
Size: Ingot 100 X 100, Ingot 125 X 125, Ingot 160 X160
Grade: A, B, C,
Saleable Item: Ingot100 X100 Grade A, Ingot100 X100 Grade B, Ingot160 X160 Grade C etc. (i.e. combination of Grade & Size will determine the saleable items.)
Characteristics to determine Grades: Carbon%, Phos%, Mn%,
Requirement:
1. Planning scenario make to Stock and stock will be maintained size and grade basis(e.g. Ingot100 X100 Grade A = 110 TO, Ingot 100X100 Grade B = 124 TO etc.).
2. Planning will be done at Ingot level.
3. Batch no will be used to track the heat number during GR of Billet.
4. There will be a BOM & Routing to produce Billet.
5. Size and grade will be determined during quality Inspection i.e. as per MIC (Carbon%, Phos%, Mn%,etc) value.
SAP requirement:
1. Planning Strategy for Ingot.
2. In which Stage production confirmation will be carried out.
3. Process mapping for saleable items.(Whether its necessary to open individual material code for each saleable items. If yes what will be the planning strategy for saleable items. But if no what will be the mapping)
4. Costing basis (at Ingot level or at saleable item level? If at saleable item level then what will be the cost components in between Ingot and saleable item level)
Looking forward for any valuable suggestion.
With Best Regards
Soumya Das
SAP PP-PS Consultant
Kolkata
Hello: +919755138074

Basically I am FI/CO consultant and worked on CO implementation project. So based on my costing view ,I can give you some rough Idea.
1) As your planning is make to stock , but still does your production planning flows from your sales planning or not. In SAP you can create your production planning either directly or from your sales planning.
2) You can Plan your material down the bill of material also i.e
at the raw material level level also. Technically each of your finished product might have standard BOM quantity and standard tak time (cycle time ) for each process which is defined in routing.So when BOM is exploded at the time of demand creation ,it explodes both your bill of material as well as your routing.Inshort if your FG is made up of X quantity of A and Y quanitity of B plus it goes machining activity of 5 minutes for each quantity produced . So If my production planning is of 1000 unit . Then after explosion it will plan
1000X of A and 1000Y of B plus 5000 minutes machine time will ple planned.And based on production lead time,procurement lead time and available stock,and available capacity for production,it will schedule the production.
3) Confirmation will be done again based on the requirement.If you want calculate WIP stock at each stage .Then it has to be confirmed at each stage to know the WIP stages. Plus at what process you do the quality inspection.In that case you have to confirm the process and then make the qc and then you have to start the new operation.
4) Yes you have to open the seperate material code for the saleable material as well as semifinished material.Your SFG will also contain the BOM and routing
5) Costing will be basically your raw material cost(which will come from bom),material overhead(come from costing sheet), Process cost(come from routing),manufacturing obverhead(come from costing sheet),administrative overhead(come from costing sheet) and sales and distribution overhead(come from costing sheet) depending on the costing requirement.
Regards
Sameer Kumar

File Sender Scenario - Mapping error message

Hi All
Scenario
I am trying to develop a test scenario where a record is read from the file and sent to R/3 using RFC (Bapi)
So i believe this will involve a file adapter as sender and a RFC adapter as receiver, I have configured data types, message types, message mapping, interface mappings, sender determination, receiver determination etc.
Problem
When i put the text file in the polling directory the file is read, but there is an error,
On checking Processed XML message in SXMB_MONI I see that the following steps listed
1 - Inbound message (CENTRAL)
2 - Receiver Determination
3 - Interface Determination
4 - Receiver Grouping
5 - Message Branch According to Receiver
6 - Request Message Mapping
7 - Request Message Mapping
Step 1 - 6 does not show any error message, step 7 has an error with the following message
<SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">EXCEPTION_DURING_EXECUTE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_basic_paycreate_file_to_rfc_map~</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException<;/SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3>Fatal Error: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.Parser~</SAP:P3>
Additional Information
My Business System Commnication channel has a Sender File adapter, this file sender is configured to read from file system from a certain directory and message protocol is File Content Conversion.
In Content Conversion parameters input fieldname and input separator are configured (does anything else need to be configured in this section?)
My input file is of the structure aaa,bbb,ccc,ddd,eee,fff,ggg
My Data Type is of the structure
<data header>
 <aaa></aaa>
 <bbb></bbb>
 <ccc></ccc>
 <ddd></ddd>
 <branch1>
 <eee></eee>
 </branch1>
 <branch2>
 <fff></fff>
 </branch2>
 <branch3>
 <ggg></ggg>
 </branch3>
</data header>
Questions
First question is why is there 2 instance of Request message mapping showing up in the monitor? Isn't this supposed to show up only once?
Second question it appears that the problem is something to do with Mapping (Message Mapping) but i tried to test the message mapping manually using the data generated in the payload and it passes the mapping successfully.
Third question, how is the input flat file converted to the complex structure of data type (as mentioned in additional information above) is this done by the input.filedNames that assigns the corresponding values from flat file to the data type?
Fourth question - is there a way to run the process step by process (as a step through in other programming IDEs?) so the problem can be more easily identified?
Thanks
Anant

Hi All
I little update - it appears that some of the scenarios developed earlier that were working earlier are now also failing at the same process of mapping with this error message.
So i am suspecting that this is not a problem with the mappings in my scenarios but rather a some technical setting related to how XI invokes this class - com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException.
Does any one have any ideas what i can check to confirm this? Whether the problem is in the technical setting or the scenario configuration?
thanks
Anant
error message attached.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">EXCEPTION_DURING_EXECUTE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_CheckDeposit_</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3>RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformatio~</SAP:P3>
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException thrown during application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_CheckDeposit_: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformatio~</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>

Idoc to edi scenarios (mapping help is required)

hi expects ,
    i am working on idoc to edi scenarios in which i am using seeburger abapter.and i have to use java mapping with using some standard function.
INPUT IDOC :
                    Name                         M/C     Min Use      Max Use        Description
INPUT*                                              M               1           1
Record EDI_DC40*                                 C               0           1                       Control Record
Record E2EDK01*                                  C               0           1                       Document Header General Data
     Record E2EDK14*                                  C               0          12                       Header Organizational Data
     Record E2EDK03*                                  C               0          10                       Header Date Segment
Record TEMP_DATE*                                C               0           1                       Temporary Date Segment
     Record DEL_DATE*                                 C               0           1                       Temporary Date Segment
     Record E2EDK04*                                  C               0          10                       Header Taxes
Record E2EDK05*                                  C               0          16                       Header Conditions
Record E2EDKA1*                                  C               0       99999                       Header Partner Info
Record TEMP_SHIP_TO*                             C               0           1                       Ship-to Info
Record TEMP_SOLD_TO*                             C               0           1                       Sold-to Info
Record TEMP_PAYER*                               C               0           1                       Payer Info
Record TEMP_CARRIER*                             C               0           1                       Carrier Info
Record TEMP_DISCHARGE_PORT*                      C               0           1                       Port of Discharge info
     Record TEMP_NOTIFY*                              C               0           1                       Notify Info
Record TEMP_NOTIFY_ALSO*                         C               0           1                       Notify Also Info
Record TEMP_EXIT_PORT*                           C               0           1                       Port of Exit Info
Record TEMP_CONSIGNEE*                           C               0           1                       Consignee
Record TEMP_SHIPPER_INFO*                        C               0           1
Record E2EDK02*                                  C               0          10                       Header Reference Data
     Record TEMP_E2EDK02*                             C               0           1                       Temp E2EDK02
Record TEMP_PO_STRING*                           C               0           1                       TEMP PO STRING
Record E2EDK17*                                  C               0         999                       Header Terms of Delivery
     Record TEMP_E2EDK17*                             C               0           1                       Temp transportation terms
     Record E2EDK18*                                  C               0          99                       Header Terms of Payment
     Record TEMP_TERMS*                               C               0           1
Record E2EDK35*                                  C               0          10                       Additional Data
Group E2EDKT1:2*
OUTPUT FIELD:
Segment B2*                                      M               1           1                       BEGINNING SEGMENT FOR SHIPMENT INFORMATION TRANSACTION
     Segment B2A*                                     C               0           1                       SET PURPOSE
Segment N9:6*                                    C               0           1                       REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
     Segment N9:7*                                    C               0           1                       REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
     Segment N9:8*                                    C               0          99                       REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
     Segment N9:9*                                    C               0          99                       REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
     Segment N9:10*                                   C               0          99                       REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
     Segment N9:11*                                   C               0          99                       REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
     Segment CUR*                                     C               0           1                       CURRENCY
Segment ITD*                                     C               0           1                       TERMS OF SALE/DEFERRED TERMS OF SALE
     Group DTM_GROUP*                                 C               0           1
Segment DTM*                                  C               0           1                       DATE/TIME REFERENCE
Segment DTM:2*                                C               0           1                       DATE/TIME REFERENCE
Segment DTM:3*

Hi,
To do the mapping,,,,even you can go for graphical mapping....
But some of the context handling issues you need to deal with,
like....
1.Never map set context of source fields to element level but Segment level.
2. Always you need to check for qualifiers while mapping it to Traget field.
Thanks & Regards
Akshay.
Dont Forget TO Give Points.

File - File Scenario - Mapping exception ( due to no of records ? )

I have a file to file scenario which works fine when the no of records in the file is less (say 2000 ).
Today it failed with the below given error, and that case the file had more than 19000 records.
<SAP:Stack>com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException thrown during application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_msgIF_Independent_ERP_MainFraim_: Fatal Error: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.Parser~</SAP:Stack>
Can anyone please advice?
Mathews

Hi Mathews,
It is the file size that would matter . check the note 821267 to find some help.
Raghu

Web Service to FTP scenario - MAPPING.NO_MAPPINGPROGRAM_FOUND error

Hi,
I am developing a Web Service to FTP scenario in XI, I am testing the interface by writing a client program using AXIS. when I invoke the service from the client, it is able to hit the service and writing the file to FTP with the data However the client is program receiving a fault with the below error.
"SystemError:<context/><code>MAPPING.NO_MAPPINGPROGRAM_FOUND</code><text>Unable to determine name of mapping program</text>"
I set quality of service to 'Exactly Once' on the SOAP sender adapter.
Would appreciate any help on this.

Hi,
What is the URL to which you are posting the SOAP message?
Is it?
http://<host>:<j2ee-port>/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet? channel=<party>:<service>:<channel>
If yes, then like mentioned the QOS is picked from the Sender SOAP adapter.
But, if the URL is ,
http://<server>:<ABAP-port>/sap/xi/engine?type=entry&version=3.0&Sender.Service=<YourService>&Interface=<YourNamespace>%5E<YourInterface>
Then you need to give the QOS as ,&QualityOfService=ExactlyOnce appended to the above URL.
More, /people/stefan.grube/blog/2006/09/21/using-the-soap-inbound-channel-of-the-integration-engine
Regards
Bhavesh

XI content for SRM and CCM scenario - mapping

Hi All,
We are using the standard business content for integrating SRM with CCM to update contract information from SRM to CCM. Both SRM and CCM are on the same system.
The configuration scenario used is MasterDataInclusionInCatalogOnWAS700 which is in the name space SAP CATALOG CONT.MGMT. 2.0_700 , http://sap.com/xi/CCM/CAT.
There are 2 interfaces being referred by this scenario: CatalogUpdateNotification_Out and this CatalogUpdateNotification_In and both the interfaces are pointing to the same meesage type CatalogTransmission but they are in different name spaces.
Once the scenario was configured there was no interface mapping available in the standard business content to map the above 2 interfaces.
SAP SRM SERVER 5.5
CatalogUpdateNotification_Out
CatalogTransmission
http://sap.com/xi/EBP
SAP CATALOG CONT.MGMT. 2.0_700 ,
CatalogUpdateNotification_In
CatalogTransmission
http://sap.com/xi/CCM/CAT
Is this the normal case and we need to develop our own mapping or is the standard content not imported correctly?
The service pack details are as follows:
PI 7.0 SP level 14
XI content
u2022 SAP BASIS 7.00 - SP 14
u2022 SAP CATALOG CONT.MGMT. 2.0_700 - SP 12
u2022 SAP SRM SERVER 5.5 - SP 11
u2022 SAP ABA 7.00 - SP 14
Thanks,
Shravan

ditto, anybody received a response from SAP with regards to this problem?
As suggested above, we could build our own mapping in XI but this would obviously be a modification to SAP standard which we would prefer to avoid.
Regards, Kyle.
OK Received a response from SAP dated Oct. 9, 2008
I assume that you have installed NW 7.00 SP14 (or higher).
Within earlier versions the mapping from XML to ABAP was to lax.
The XML message was processed witout regarding the name of the root
element. This was fixed with SP14.
When you call an interface the XML message must match with the type
defined in the WSDL used for proxy generation.
Either the message or the WSDL used to generate the proxy seems to be
wrong here.
Here is a work around should solve this problem until we make available in a standard note soon.
I will do it internally to our development team but I am sorry that i can not tell now when the note will be ready.
Disable the new check by adding the following entry in transaction sproxset
-Name: ST_USE_LAX_ON
-Value: X
-User: <empty>
-Inactive: <empty>
Edited by: Kyle Freeman on Oct 9, 2008 5:54 PM

Suggestion/opinion in scenario mapping required-PLEASE

Hi,
I have a typical retail scenario and I seek expert suggestion opinion on this.
In a scenario where materials are purchased from different vendors and received.
Later they are sold to customer/s through direct selling or mass market and also sold to other company of the group via ICT process at the cost.
Goods are also transferred to other company via ICT process.
These goods are having different combination while they are being sold.
To give a classic example:
Company orders for say pens of different size and different colors each defined as a different mat code.
They are ordered in hugh quantities and sold in the mass market either in several quantity or a single piece.
Most often what happens is that looking at the market trend company packs different types of pens in one pouch and sell them either through mass market or through consignment.
Sometimes they create hugh quantity of packs in anticipation that they will get sold.
However it also happens that some customer is interested in buying those packs in bulk quantities but only thing that he insists is that he wants to have a different type of pen out of several pens in the pouch already created.
Suppose a pack consists of pens of same type but of colors black,blue,green and all having differerent material codes.
Customer is intersested in buying this pack in bulk quantity but his only requirement is that instead of balck he would like to have a red pen in each pouch.
Company does not want to lose this customer at any cost since he has shown interest in buying a very hugh quantity.
This is one of the typical examples and this type of things are very common in such type of retail business.
Our scope is very limited in the sense that we have to map this business right from procurement to sell with standars MM/SD/FI functionality.
There are hundreads of businesses who run similarly and have implemented SAP.
In the given context I need opinion from you experts on how to map following scenarios
1..How to create pouches/value packs
2..How to change the combinations if a specific customer requirement comes to alter the combination as stated above
3..how to handle returns.
Our approach:
For creating pouches/packs, we are planning to use MM subcontracting functioanality whereby packs will be created inhouse but will be treated as subcontracting by having a logical vendor created in the system.
We have restricted the creation of packs to one level BOM only and also we will restrict creation of BOM to one instance only so that we will not have any alternate BOM created for the same parent material(separate item code that we will be creating for the entire pack) and child materials(different types of pens with aseparate material code) combination.
This will ensure that if already a pack has been created with the combination of components mentioned above ,system will not allow if someone tries to create another pack for the same parent child combination.
Meaning that there are no versions available & tracking becomes easy.
The only worrying factor is that these types of pack creation activity(value packs) is very frequent in this type of business.
Users will not accept to create a different material for the value pack and subsequently to create bom and then do subcontracting to have the stock every now and then.
Also how to handle the issue of changing the component of an already created pouch.
Has anyone mapped such types of things in standard functionality of MM SD.If so request you all to share your suggestions/views on this.
Thanks in advance
arjman

Hi,
There are 3 companies i.e., ABC, X123 & Y789.
1. Create a service contract in ABC for X123 as Service Provider. Prerequisite is Create X123 as the vendor in ABC company.
2. Create the Service order based on that in ABC.
3. Create a service contract in X123 for Y789 as Service Provider. Prerequisite is Create Y789 as the vendor in X123 company.
4. Create the Service order based on that in X123.
Then do the normal proceedings. Correct me if I am wrong.
Regards,
Maheswaran.

Scenario mapping

Hi,
I have the scenario where there are 2 plants.One plant is located at for eg at japan and Office say at US.
SAP system will at US.Material is purchased from Japan manufacturing plant.
In legacy they are sending the Blanket PO to (for eg) japan, then actual PO and then material is put in stock in transit. andthen actual GR at US .
The following materials are bought fromJapan
1. Main product
2. Spares
3. Accessories
I have few questions on this
1.How to map whether Japan should be treated as plant or Vendor? Japan does not have SAP system
2.What material types should be suggeted as material is going to be stocked and has to be planned by MRP run.
3.Also sometimes once PO is raised on Japan the material is sent directly to customer, so what is this scenario and how to map it.
Thx
Thx

you can make it V or S...it does not mater it subcontracted or inhouse procedued,,,it all depends on what type of settlemt is required that is it...
Consult yr CO consultant and take his opinion if S or V how to settle the cost incurred
Std nmethods will allow both options which option you should use depends on how the costing method is involved in your conpany

RE:idoc inbound scenario "mapping issue"

Hi experts,
we r facing the problem in idoc inbound scenario, while to generate multiple idoc's.
we need to generate the idoc's based on two fields, Location_code and Date. If any of the field is changing we need to generate the new idoc.
below is the sender payload :
<row>
 <Date>20100111</Date>
 <Sign>+</Sign>
 <Tender_Code>ZSHT</Tender_Code>
 <Tender_Amount>1890.30</Tender_Amount>
 <Location_Code>0000001000</Location_Code>
 </row>
 <row>
 <Date>20100112</Date>
 <Sign>+</Sign>
 <Tender_Code>ZSHT</Tender_Code>
 <Tender_Amount>1890.30</Tender_Amount>
 <Location_Code>0000001000</Location_Code>
 </row>
 <row>
 <Date>20100112</Date>
 <Sign>+</Sign>
 <Tender_Code>ZSHT</Tender_Code>
 <Tender_Amount>1890.30</Tender_Amount>
 <Location_Code>0000001001</Location_Code>
 </row>
 <row>
 <Date>20100112</Date>
 <Sign>+</Sign>
 <Tender_Code>ZSHT</Tender_Code>
 <Tender_Amount>4532.32</Tender_Amount>
 <Location_Code>0000001001</Location_Code>
 </row>
for the above payload ,we need 3 idocs as below
idoc1:
Location_code>1000 Date->20100111
idoc2:
Location_code>1000 Date->20100112
idoc3:
Location_code>1001 Date->20100112
under the third idoc fourth row should get repeated.
at present we have the following mapping which is generating multiple idocs bsased on only location code, it's like
Location_code-->removecontext-->sort-->splitbyvalue(valuechange)-->collapsecontext--->idoc
rgds
selvam

Hi,
Thanks Suraj , logic has worked but there is a simple issue , LOCATION_Code is mapped with SNDRPRN and RCVPRN of the EDI_DC40 segment when i m execuiting the payload it throws error for the second idoc generated , when the LOCATION_CODE changes this should also get updated to that field. Mapping for SDNPRN has been done like this.
LOCATION_CODE --->removecontext-->|
 formatbyexample--->SNDRPRN
idoc mapping logic---------------->|
pl suggest...
rgds
selvam

Scenario mapping in QM module

Dear Expert,
As i am going to implement QM module . As i have one scenarion like below.
Kindly suggecst how to map this scenario.
Scenario IV: While producing finished materials some by products or waste materials are
created such as water. These materials are disposed, before disposing these materials they are
inspected for quality to make sure that they are within the predefined range.
with regards
v.k

Hi
First crete all master data required to create inspection lot
For eg:-
1.create inspection type in the material master(say 03/04)
2.create MIC
3.create inspection plan
Now when production order get GR/released system will trigger inspection lot and you can assure the qualti of the product
Abu Fathima

Crushing plant scenario mapping

Hello Experts,
One of our client to use SAP for Crushing plant, where the huge rocks are crushed in to Specific sizes of Aggregate (Output material) i.e. Aggregate 40 mm, 20mm and aggreate 10 mm get Produced.
ROCK BLASTING
CRUSHING
SCREENING
How should I map the BOM for this, Raw material is Big rock block.
finished materials are 4.
Please guide me how can I map PP process for this scenario.

HI,
If this plant is on continous production, I suggest you to set up REM - for the finished product.
You can create 4 different material and separate BOM for each finished product.
You can create single routing and assign all the materials to it.
Create Product cost collector for the finished product and the execution like GI and GR...
hope this helps

Plz suggest scenario mapping.

Hi All,
I want to map following scenario in sap.
We are procuring some material say 'X'. Which have two quality characteristics.
Let's say Length : 'A'    and
              Weight :'B'
My client has decided the procurement rate on these both parameters.(Both parameter at a time)
Ex.   A=2m and B= 10kg then rate is Rs.15/ea
        A=3m and B= 20kg then rate is Rs.20?ea.
we have around 350 such combinations.
My problem is that how to map this scene in SAP using QM and MM.
because at the time of GR only we will know , what rate should be invoiced ?
and also around 400 GR per day of this particular material are happening.
for this i have been suggested to go for Auto PO against GR.
Please suggest soln.
B. Raju

dear Raju
My suggestion will be
1) Maintain all the possible combination of the rating pattern in a z table. or if some logic is there maintain that in the Z table
2) make your QM procurement key setting with Block invoice. So till UD is given Invoice cannot be generated
3) When GR is done inspection lot is created . RR is done and UD is given to the inspection lot
4) Attach mailing option of follow up action to all the UD codes of Usage Decision .. You will have to modify or create a Function module which will pick up RR results check with the combinations maintained in Z table and the same procurment rate is mailed to the ids of people who will generate the invoice.
Please refer to the below link for the same
Link: [sending mail|Follow-up actions via Usage Decision]
Link: [issue regarding procurement|Re: Deduction during procurement]
hope this helps
Regards
gajesh

Duct Fabrication Scenario mapping in PP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for