Due date is showing earlier than doc. date

Hi,
I have a funny question. I have posted billing doc. in VF01 for 10000/- on 30.06.2009 payment term is 30 days from the doc. date so the due date should be 30.07.2009. Against this doc. i have posted one residual payment for 5000/- on 15.08.2009 but when i am executing customer line item report in FBL5N system is showing this residual doc. date is 15.08.2009 and due date is 30.07.2009. Why is the due date showing a earlier date than doc date? The due date should be the same day or later than doc date.
Adv. thanks to all....
Regards

Hi,
When we do a residual payment option, the new document created for the residual amount, is created with reference to the original document. When we create documents with reference, by default the baseline date of the new document is same as that of the original. You can change the base line date by double clicking on the line after simulating.
Also check if you find any options in SPRO under the open item processing in the business transaction node for Accounts receivable and Accounts payable.
Thanks and Regards,
Anit

Similar Messages

Posting not possible (Value date earlier than capitalization date)

Hello , we are getting the error shown below. I'am not sure where to go to fix this can any offer any advice.
Thank you
Posting not possible (Value date earlier than capitalization date)
Message no. AA 322
Diagnosis
Asset 000000040048 0000 was first capitalized on 20080831.
You cannot post to an asset that was not yet capitalized.
Procedure
You have the following options:
Change the asset value date of your posting.
Capitalize the asset by posting an acquisition.

Generally this message will come , if you have created a asset with a capitalization date say 31/08/2008 and you are settling a Internal order for last period say 07 on with a posting date earlier than capitalization date , say 15/08/2008.
The System will not allow you to post because the value date cannot be earlier than capitalization date.
Change the value date to later than capitalization date and post.

Document date is earlier than acquisition date for asset

Client has an asset which they want to post an acquistion for as of 1/1/2011. They are in December of 2011. They first put an acquisition in with 12/31/2011 and then cancelled it, realizing they needed a docdate of 1/1/2011. When they try to redo the acquisition with a docdate of 1/1/2011 they get the error "Document date is earlier than acquisition date for asset xxxxx"
The capitalization date on the asset is 1/1/2011. I looked at the acquisition date (thorugh SQL) and it is "1899-12-30 00:00:00.000"
Does anyone know why it is preventing from posting?
(Posting dates allowed are 1/1/11-12/31/11 for period 12 of 2011 and the period is unlocked)
Alan

Hi
I do believe that the problem is in the capitalization date 12/31/2011
Even if you have cancellled the first acqusition , and the acquisition date has taken the dummy date that assets have when there are no acqusitions 1899-12-30 00:00:00.000
Still the capitalization date remains 12/31/2011
and this will deter any transactions earlier than 12/31/2011
My question is,
can you still edit the field capitalization date?
Jose Antonio Castillo

Error In Backdated Reservation Creation Base date earlier than current dat

Dear Experts,
Error while creating Reservation for back date.
Base date earlier than Current date.
Can we create backdated reservation ? and post goods issue to the same ?
if it need configuration please explain the steps for allowing creation of backdated reservations.
Thanks in Advance

What is the error message nos.?

The Basic Finish date is a Day earlier than Planned date

Dear Experts,
I am getting a strange behaviour about Maintenance order Basic Finish Date when generated from Maintenance Plan. I have Customizing settings (TCode : OPU7) Adjust: "Adjust Basic dates, adjust dep reqmts to order start date" and scheduling type : Backwards in Time. For this setting Order Basic Finish Date is a day earlier than Planned date , but when Schduling type is Backwards instead of Backwards in Time, Basic Finish date is same as Planned date.
Example: The start of cycle of a monthly plan is 14-Nov-2010, 1st Planned date is 14-Dec-2010. When Scheduling type is " Backwards in time" , the order generated is having Basic Finish Date as 13-Dec-2010 .And when Scheduling type is "Backwards" , Basic finish date is 14-Dec-2010.
Thank you.
-Malay-

Hi there,
Please check the primilinairy buffer in your strategy package. This field have an effect on your order start date.
But I agree on Pete, you should use a forward planning.
Regards,
Johan
Edited by: Johan Zeeman on Dec 17, 2010 11:29 AM

PO Doc Date is not Greater than MIGO Date.

Dear All,
I ahve Done PO with doc date 02.02.2009 & i create MIGO as 25.01.2009 System is accepting this document.
so i want restriction of this procedure.
PO date is not greater than MIGO date.
Thanks
Shital

hi
for ur problem just set message no ME039 as error message
go to SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Environment Data>Define Attributes of System Messages
here make message ME -039 as error
regards
KI

Posting date/period 31.12.2014/009 is earlier than existing date/period 17.01.2015/010

Hi Experts
While posting of invoice document (T.Code MIRO) I got the below error message;
Posting date/period 31.12.2014/009 is earlier than existing date/period 17.01.2015/010
Message no. FI_E050
Diagnosis
Commitment postings to Funds Management require that the current transaction's posting date is earlier than the posting date of the original or change account assignment line item of the document.
I have checked several threads still i am not able to get answer -Invoice posting Error
Regards
Sp

Suraj,
please check following note
564439 - FM update date is earlier than an existing postings
Regards

Can't get access in Time Machine to certain folders for any date earlier than current date/time.

Can't get access in Time Machine to certain folders for any date earlier than current date/time, even when entering as Admin. Why do certain folders have small red "-" badge in lower right corner of folder icon? Here's a picture of the dilemma:
I've tried monkeying with priveleges using Command I, and changing users, but to no avail. Can anyone help?

Right. Here's what the permissions look like from the Finder Command I:
I'm not sure what "Custom" means, but when I then try to change it to "Read & Write", it doesn't take.... just comes back as Custom. Interesting to note that not only am I logged into Joan's account where the data folder and file lives) to do this, but when I do it from my own account as Admin (dunc...mpster) I get the same result.

Can GR date earlier than GI date?

Hi,
Good morning! I have a inquiry want to ask all the MM expert.
I have a Good Issues date is on 22 May, but the Good Receive date is on 1st May.
Is this flow acceptable?
Good receive come before good issues sound not logical right ? But my user able to do that, when I try to reverse back the GR with wrong date, it come out this warning "document flow for delivey cannot be updated.."
Is that my logic was wrong? Please guide.
Thank you very much.
Warm regards,
PC

Hello Peai ,
The will accept the posting dates which may sound illogical .. eg GI date is earlier that GR date for a procured material .
The system has the following logic :-
If there is sufficient stock coverage at the time ( system time ) of posting the document , the system will allow the posting in any date withing the same period . However if the period changes ( i.e , posting date is in the previous period ) then the system throws an error.
Eg .
GR thro Po done on 22nd May
GI for the same done on 1st May
Logically speaking ... the GI date cannot be earlier than the GR date , but the system allows this as these are in the same period .
Regards
Anis

RE:Planning dates are coming earlier to Invoice dates

Dear All,
i Have one problem Planning dates are coming earlier to Invoice dates.
In some cases our Invoice date is 19.02.2010 but planning date is coming
as 07.02.2010 due to which our overdue receivables are becoming higher
than the actual.
If anyone have idea please replay.
Regards.

Hi,
You may refer to SAP Note 24883 for determination of planning date.
Trust this helps
Cheers!!

PR Date Should be less than PO date

Hi
I have done the change in message type to control PO date at the time of creation, now PO can be created only in current date but if at a later stage somebody has been created one more PR and change the PO and add one more line item from this PR then PR date is greater than PO date.
So this is objectionable and I want to control this i.e. PR date should be less than PO date.
Please guide how can i achieve this?
Regards
Ajay Goel

Hello,
Ajay if u you want to restrict the PO can be created only in current date then u can take help of your ABAPER because its possible through BADI.
If you want to add the other line item in PO Or Use Tcode Me22n you can not change the document date that time bcoz its disable check it.

From date(ETTIFN-AB) greater than To date(ETTIFN-BIS) in table ETTIFN

Hi,
In my client system I have observed that in table ETTIFN(Installation Facts (Normal) for a specific operand the "From date" field contains date which is greater than the date contained in the "To date" field.
eg: from date = 20/7/2008
To date = 4/4/2008
This is observed in multiple records of the same operand.
Can any one throw some light on this issue.
1) How this could have happened, and using what transaction.
2) what will be the effect of such entry on rate category and billing.
3) how this can be changed.
any suggestion will be highly appreciated.
thanks
ajay

In my experience, this a sort of a bug that happens in several time sliced tables.
However, the programs only seem to take the BIS date into account, so this inconsistency doesn't create any problems.
If I'm not mistaken, there are some notes on this error, but I'm not sure if it'll fix the problem for every table.
When in doubt, create a customer message to SAP explaining in which cases the error is generated and ask for a correction.

End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it

Hello
I put CONTRACT START DATE and CONTRACT END DATE fields on the form. These 2 objects (Date/Time objjects) i pulled them from Satndard tab of pallette and dropped on my layout page design, fine.
Now, am trying to put a validation that the end dat eshould not lower than start date, so, i got a thread as below from Niall,
http://forums.adobe.com/message/1909551
and i did my FormCalc coding under EXIT event of END DATE field as below,
// Pls. note this FormCalc
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - Begin
var stDate
var endDate
stDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_START_DATE") .rawValue
endDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue
if (stDate > endDate) then
    xfa.host.messageBox("End date is lower than Start date! End date is cleared")
    xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue = null
endif
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - End
I tried in VALIDATE, CALCULATE, CHANGE events of END DATE, but nothing working!!
PLs. let me kow how can i achieve my requirement? I am anewbie,
Thank you

If you use the exit event, you will probably have to have the same code on both the start and end date fields since they have a dependancy on each other. Maybe better to try the validate event of the end date so that if either field is changed the event gets fired. You can try the following for validate event
// Pls. note this FormCalc
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - Begin
var stDate
var endDate
stDate = CON_START_DATE.rawValue
endDate = $.rawValue
if ( HasValue(endDate) ) then
    if (stDate > endDate) then
        xfa.host.messageBox("End date is lower than Start date! End date is cleared")
        $.rawValue = null
    endif
endif
1
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - End

Contract End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it

Hello
I put CONTRACT START DATE and CONTRACT END DATE fields on the form. These 2 objects (Date/Time objjects) i pulled them from Satndard tab of pallette and dropped on my layout page design, fine.
Now, am trying to put a validation that the end dat eshould not lower than start date, so, i got a thread as below from Niall,
http://forums.adobe.com/message/1909551
and i did my FormCalc coding under EXIT event of END DATE field as below,
// Pls. note this FormCalc
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - Begin
var stDate
var endDate
stDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_START_DATE") .rawValue
endDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue
if (stDate > endDate) then
xfa.host.messageBox("End date is lower than Start date! End date is cleared")
xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue = null
endif
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - End
I tried in VALIDATE, CALCULATE, CHANGE events of END DATE, but nothing working!!
PLs. let me kow how can i achieve my requirement? I am anewbie,
Thank you

http://forums.adobe.com/message/4264933#4264933

MY PRE-ORDER IS COMING MUCH EARLIER THAN ESTIMATED DATE.

My order for Plus 64GB was supposed to ship on 10/24. And today I receive the notice that it was shipped yesterday.
It's coming on time. It happened to everyone? or Am I just lucky?

I am sure Verizon picked a overestimated the ship date under the principle it is better to deliver earlier than promised than later than promised. Since many wanted it on the go live date, it would have been bad to miss 2 dates! Pure psychology.

Due date is showing earlier than doc. date

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for