Dunning - 2nd level dunning is not working

Hello Experts
I have received a requirement from client for configuration of two level dunning (ie 14 & 35 days). I did the following configuration
(a) Defined the Dunning Area
(b) Defined the Dunning procedure in the following manner:
Dunning Interval in days - 1
No. of Dunning Levels - 2
Total Due items for Dunning - 0
Minimum Days arreas - 14
Line Item grace period - 14
Selected -> Standard transaction dunning
Under Dunning Level Tab
Days in Arrears - 14 & 35
We are not using interest & no penality charges.
Assigned the Dunning Test with the following combination
Letter 1 u2013
W_MHND-BUKRS = Company Name
W_MHND-MAHNN = 1
W_MHND_SMABER = Dunning Area
W_MHNK-MAHNA = u2018Dunning Procedureu2019
Letter 2 u2013
W_MHND-BUKRS = Company Name
W_MHND-MAHNN = 2
W_MHND_SMABER = Dunning Area
W_MHNK-MAHNA = u2018Dunning Procedureu2019
(c) Maintained the Dunning Area in customer master data -> Company code data -> Correspondance
(d) I have posted the sales invoice with posting date and due date as 01.03.2011.
While carrying the dunning activtity through T.Code F150 (I did the 1st level run with dunning date as 22.03.2011 ) -> All the activities are going smothly like Dunning selection completed, Dunning Print out completed and Sample Printout is completed for the 1st level
The second level dunning is carried on 26.04.2011 as dunning date. However, after completion of selection perameters. the system is showing as Dunning Selection is completed bu the system log says as follows:
Date        Time               Message
26.04.2011 15:34:12    Job started
26.04.2011 15:34:12    Step 001 started (program SAPF150S2, variant &0000000000523, user ID AMUNNALURI)
26.04.2011 15:34:12     ******************   Log for dunning run 20110430 / TEST1 ****************
26.04.2011 15:34:13     =========================================================================
26.04.2011 15:34:13    > Account D 0000000061, company code SC01 is being processed
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >            Reading account data and document information    Phase 0
26.04.2011 15:34:13    > Account D 0000000061 has a payment method for incoming payments
26.04.2011 15:34:13    > Account D 0000000061 read items: 11
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >             Processing and completing dunning lines         Phase I
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000052/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Document 0090000380/2008/001 has new dunning level 1.
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000381/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000384/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000387/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000614/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 1400000052/2008/002 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 1800000012/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Document 0064000433/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Document 0064000437/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Document 0064000438/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >           Check legal dunning procedure and credit memos     Phase II -
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >           Minimum charges and dunning interest             Phase III
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >             Generate dunning data                           Phase IV
26.04.2011 15:34:14    Job finished
If i continue the Dunning Print & Sample Print out.. the system is showing the following logs
Date        Time      Message
26.04.2011 15:35:31     Job started
26.04.2011 15:35:31     Step 001 started (program SAPF150D2, variant &0000000000344, user ID AMUNNALURI)
26.04.2011 15:35:31     >        Start print phase
26.04.2011 15:35:31               0 dunning notices were read
26.04.2011 15:35:31               0 dunning notices have been printed
26.04.2011 15:35:31    End dunning printout 30.04.11 / TEST1
26.04.2011 15:35:31    Job finished
Kindly let me know, did i missed any steps in the configuration??
Regards
Anil

Hello Renan
Thanks for your reply, I am finding difference during 1st run and 2nd level run during selection perameters in the following area.
(Note that, we are not using the Interest / charges)
During 1st level dunning the system is showing as Dunning Level Log under Phase II, Phase III, Phase IV document no.
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >           Check legal dunning procedure and credit memos     Phase II -
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >           Minimum charges and dunning interest             Phase III
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Interest indicator 0N and currency GBP are missing in T056Z
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >             Generate dunning data                           Phase IV
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Account D 0000000061 dunning notice/dun.area. Dunning area 58 is being processed.
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Account D 0000000061 dunning notice/dun.level. Dunning level 1 is being processed.
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Account D 0000000061 uses dunning procedure DG3
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Dunning level D 0000000061 is used for account 1
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >   Document 0064000438/2010/001: Dunning level 1, days in arrears 20, status <.Dpi>
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Account D 0000000061 dunning data has been generated.
26.04.2011 15:30:39    Job finished
Where as for 2nd level dunning the system is showing under Dunning Level Log is as follows:
26.04.2011 15:34:13   > Document 0064000438/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13   > Check legal dunning procedure and credit memos Phase II -
26.04.2011 15:34:13   > Minimum charges and dunning interest Phase III
26.04.2011 15:34:13   > Generate dunning data Phase IV
26.04.2011 15:34:14   Job finished
Due to this, i am presumed that some more configuration has been missed at my end.
Kindly revert with your observations in the above log
Regards
Anil

Similar Messages

2nd Level Dunning Problem

Hello Experts
I have configured the two level dunning procedure. Configuration settings are as follows:
(a) Defined the Dunning Area
(b) Defined the Dunning procedure in the following manner:
Dunning Interval in days - 1
No. of Dunning Levels - 2
Total Due items for Dunning - 0
Minimum Days arreas - 14
Line Item grace period - 14
Selected -> Standard transaction dunning
Under Dunning Level Tab
Days in Arrears - 14 & 35
We are not using interest & no penality charges.
Assigned the Dunning Test with the following combination
Observations during Testing :-
(1) Customer sales invoice posted on 01.03.2011 and due date is 01.03.2011
(2) 1st level dunning carried on 21.03.2011 and dunning run and print out is success
(3) 2nd level dunning carried on 30.04.2011 .... here the system is showing the dunning run log
     Document number XXXXXX (same document what i have posted on 01.03.2011) has now dunning level 2
     But the system is (a) Not checked the Dunning notice / dunning area for customer
                                   (b) Not checked the Dunning procedure
                                    but shown as job finished
    If i continue the print out option - the sytem is showing 0 dunning notices are read & not customer dunning history updated
Kindly let me did i missed any configuration ? Altenatvely if i want to do the debug with the help of ABAP.. in which program i need to maintain the Break point
Kindly revert
Regards
Anil

Hi
Did the dunning run on suggested date.. but unfortunately the result is the same
Regards
Anil

Multi Level BOm is not working in SAP afs

Hi Experts,
I am facing issue in MRP.For multi level bom's ,Requirements is not getting generates.Is there any settings is there to active multi level bom for afs materials.
please suggest solution
Thanks and Regards,
Deepika.

Hello Deepika,
As we know AFS materials are planned at SKU level (Grid and stock categories) you can use AFS MRP (/N/AFS/MD02) only.
Please refer OSS note Note 981747 - FAQ - AFS Production Planning
Question 5 Made-To-Order Planning -Multi-Level (MD50) does not work for AFS Materials and Sales Orders containing AFS materials.
Answer: Made to Order Multi level planning functionality was never enhanced for AFS and hence transaction MD50 is not supported.
Steps are as,
1. Create a MTO/PTO sales order for an AFS material.
2. Run AFS MRP using transaction code /AFS/MD02.
3. Convert the planned order to production order.
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar

For MTO scenario,multi level bom is not working sap afs pp

Hi Experts,
              We are implementing MTO scenario for our client. I have maintained strategy group for FERT is 40 and strategy group for HALB and ROH are 20.
               For single level BOM , requirements is not getting generates properly.
              I would like to know What are all the settings is required to create AFS BOM.(single and multi level)
               Please suggest me.
Thanks & Regards,
Deepika.

Hello Deepika,
As we know AFS materials are planned at SKU level (Grid and stock categories) you can use AFS MRP (/N/AFS/MD02) only.
Please refer OSS note Note 981747 - FAQ - AFS Production Planning
Question 5 Made-To-Order Planning -Multi-Level (MD50) does not work for AFS Materials and Sales Orders containing AFS materials.
Answer: Made to Order Multi level planning functionality was never enhanced for AFS and hence transaction MD50 is not supported.
Steps are as,
1. Create a MTO/PTO sales order for an AFS material.
2. Run AFS MRP using transaction code /AFS/MD02.
3. Convert the planned order to production order.
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar

BW Field level Autorizations are not working in the WEBI Reports

Dear All,
1. I have created Authorization roles with Infoobjects Authorization Objects.
2. In Bex Query Authoizations are working on the Infoobjects like for
Ex: For USER1 I have given Company code = 1000 &
User 2 I have given authorization for 1100.....
3. Import those roles into Business Objects-CMC.
4.Users were Imported.
But in the WEBI Reports BW Field level Authorizations are not working i.e for USER1 authorization for Company code is 1000 , in WEBI report it is showing all the Company codes data for USER1.
For USER2 also showing all the data in the WEBI report.
Plz help me on this issue.
Thanks,
Kiran Manyam

Hi,
For Authorization to work in BO you can check the following:
1. You need to create authorization variables in your BEx query.
Also these variables should not be input ready.
2. While creating universe in BO you need to select "Single Sign On" option available in the parameters iwhile creating a new
connection.
Regards,
Rohit

ME21N Material group level authorization is not working in ECC 6.0

Dear Security Experts,
We have created a role Z_ME21N with one Tcode ME21N. The role has to restrict users in the material group level.
For that, we added Authorization object M_MATE_WGR.
1. When we are trying to add field values for {M_MATE_WGR, BEGRU}, generally it should show me the list possible values to be used based on the MM configuration related to Material Authorization Group. We have correctly configured the authorization groups from V_TBRG for M_MATE_WGR. But itu2019s not showing any possible values.
2. However we are able to add values manually, but I guess these are not being considered during authorization check and our restriction on Authorization group level in ME21N is not working.
Test Scenario: We have manually added values 005,007,009,010,013 (which is pointing to specific material group) to BEGRU of M_MATE_WGR. We already assigned this Authorization Object to role Z_ME21N and this role has been assigned to u2018testuseru2019, but the authorization check with the M_MATE_WGR authorization group is not happening. It allows operations on all the material groups.
Anybody came accross same scenario?
SAP Prodcut version : ECC 6.0
Database : SQL Server 2005
Support pack level : 15
Please share your views, thanks in advance.
Regards,
Abu Sandeep

Dear All,
I got a reply just now from SAP regarding the same issue.
I coudnt understand what SAP and you are saying.
Dear Abu
*Apologies for the delay. This message has been turned on to application*
*area of MM from the Basis side just now.*
*Unfortunately, authorization object "M_MATE_WGR " is not checked*
*in the purchasing transactions (PR & PO), the system works as standard*
*functional designed.*
*Only the following objects are checked in PR/PO:*
*M_BEST_BSA Document Type in PO M_BANF_BSA Document Type in PR*
*M_BEST_EKG Purchasing Group in PO M_BANF_EKG Purchasing Group in PR*
*M_BEST_EKO Purchasing Org. in PO M_BANF_EKO Purchasing Org. in PR*
*M_BEST_WRK Plant in PO M_BANF_WRK Plant in PR*
*Setting in check/maintain on in SU24 only means that the profile*
*generator will propose the object when creating a user, however is*
*does not mean that M-MATE_WGR will be checked.*
*Please close this message by pressing the confirm button at your*
*earliest convenience.*
*Many thanks in advance for your understanding.*
So, how can I resolve this problem? John, are you sure that, you implemented this successfully?
SAP says, this cant be done.
Regards,
Abu Sandeep.

2nd gen ipod will not work or neither of 2 computers will recognize it

My Daughters nano 2nd gen just stopped working, it will not do anything, "froze" up solid as she says.
I have gone through the "5Rs" but nothing will make the ipod show any life and nothing seems able to make the computer see the ipod. I can't do the "restore" option because the computer needs to acknowledge the ipod to complete that step.
I have 2 computers and neither computer recognizes the ipod at all. i have read all the troubleshooting tips, all the tips in the discussions any other suggestions, we are 4 hours away from an "Apple Store"
I am really new to this iPod world, and it appears there is nothing to friendly about it when it comes to this,

I am also having a similar problem when i try to connect my ipod it comes up with the error message "the software required for communicating with the ipod is not installed correctly. please reinstall itunes to install the ipods software."
i ran itunes diagnostics and it said that itunes helper is not running.
Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 2 (Build 2600)
EMACHINES E4028
iTunes 7.7.1.11
QuickTime 7.5
CD Driver 2.0.7.3
CD Driver DLL 2.1.1.1
Apple Mobile Device 2.0.1.5
Bonjour 1.0.4.12 (118.4)
iTunes Serial Number 65B56A93FAD8B1F6
Current user is an administrator.
The current local date and time is 2008-08-17 17:42:38.
iTunes is not running in safe mode.
Video Display Information
Intel(R) 82915G/GV/910GL Express Chipset Family
** External Plug-ins Information **
No external plug-ins installed.
** iPod/iPhone Connectivity Tests **
iPodService 7.7.1.11 is currently running.
iTunesHelper is currently not running.
Apple Mobile Device service 2.1.29.0 is currently running.
Universal Serial Bus Controllers:
Intel(R) 82801FB/FBM USB Universal Host Controller - 2658. Device is working properly.
Intel(R) 82801FB/FBM USB Universal Host Controller - 2659. Device is working properly.
Intel(R) 82801FB/FBM USB Universal Host Controller - 265A. Device is working properly.
Intel(R) 82801FB/FBM USB Universal Host Controller - 265B. Device is working properly.
Intel(R) 82801FB/FBM USB2 Enhanced Host Controller - 265C. Device is working properly.
No FireWire (IEEE 1394) Host Controller found.
I have uninstalled and reinstalled itunes many times doing the full uninstall as outlined on the support page. I have also tried installing an older version of itunes but this did not work either. I checked msconfig and ituneshelper.exe is selected to load at startup but when i check task manager it is not there.
Is there any way to fix this problem. I have been trying for two whole days to sort this. I have tried the ipod on other computers and it works fine so i am certain there is nothing wrong with the ipod.

Level Based Measures not working

Hi,
I've put an LBM at the second Level (Region) of a Dimension called GeographicDIM.
the Dimension looks like:
Total, Region, Country
The LBM is called #Customer_ID_Region, created as new a Logical column of an existing logical Column of my Fact, aggregation.
If I create a Report with Region, Country, the LBM is correct. then I add another logical Column from the FACT, eg. Revenue_SUM, or Customer_key_Count, the LBM isn't frozen any longer.
This happens also if I switch place any LBM to an other Dimensions.
What could it be?
Thanks in advance
Frank

Hi,
the Problem is still not fixed.
A LBM at the Grand Total Level works great. If I set a LBM to a Level below its not longer frozen if I add any Fact.
Here is the SQL-Statement generated if I do the following:
I created one LBM and set it to the Grand Total and another one set it to a Level below (Region).
select D1.c1 as c1,
D1.c2 as c2,
D1.c3 as c3,
D1.c4 as c4,
D1.c5 as c5,
D1.c6 as c6
from
(select D1.c1 as c1,
D1.c2 as c2,
D1.c3 as c3,
D1.c4 as c4,
D1.c5 as c5,
D1.c6 as c6
from
(select D1.c2 as c1,
D1.c4 as c2,
D2.c1 as c3,
D1.c1 as c4,
D1.c3 as c5,
D1.c5 as c6,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY D1.c2, D1.c4, D1.c5 ORDER BY D1.c2 ASC, D1.c4 ASC, D1.c5 ASC) as c7
from
(select D1.c1 as c1,
D1.c2 as c2,
D1.c3 as c3,
D1.c4 as c4,
D1.c5 as c5
from
(select sum(D1.c1) over (partition by D1.c2) as c1,
D1.c2 as c2,
sum(D1.c3) over (partition by D1.c5, D1.c2) as c3,
D1.c4 as c4,
D1.c5 as c5,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY D1.c5 ORDER BY D1.c5 ASC) as c6
from
(select count(distinct T196.MASTER_CUSTOMER_KEY) as c1,
T1365.REGION as c2,
count(distinct T196.MASTER_CUSTOMER_KEY) as c3,
T1365.COUNTRY_NAME as c4,
T1365.COUNTRY_CODE as c5
from
GEOGRAPHIC_DIM T1365,
SALES_FACT T196
where ( T196.COUNTRY_CODE = T1365.COUNTRY_CODE )
group by T1365.COUNTRY_CODE, T1365.COUNTRY_NAME, T1365.REGION
) D1
) D1
where ( D1.c6 = 1 )
) D1,
(select count(distinct T196.MASTER_CUSTOMER_KEY) as c1
from
SALES_FACT T196
) D2
The Grand Total LBM shows the correct Data, the Region-LBM not.
The Region-LBM is not calculated in a separate statement.
I don't know why?

PR Item Level Release WF not working after Release Strategy change

Hi Experts,
           I did PR item Level Release Standard Work flow and it was working fine now due to client requirement we changed the release strategy and now when the PR workflow triggers it gives the Below mentioned error.
I really don't understand y after changing the release strategy workflow is not working and giving the following error.
Even if i restart the workflow in SWPR the same error is occuring.
Exception occurred    - Error when starting work item 000000390118
PROCESS_NODE     - Error when processing node '0000000003' (ParForEach index 000000)
CREATE                   - Error when creating a component of type 'Step'
CREATE_VIA_WFM - Agent determination for step '0000000003' failed
EVALUATE_AGENT_VIA_RULE - Error in resolution of rule 'AC00000148' for step '0000000003'
AC00000148             - Object type 'TS' not valid
Executing flow work item   - Work item 000000390118: Object FLOWITEM method EXECUTE cannot        be executed
Executing flow work item   - Error when processing node '0000000003' (ParForEach index 000000)
Regards,
Hari

Hello Hari,
please set a breakpoint at function module
ME_REL_GET_RESPONSIBLE
and see what happends in section
    CASE t16fc-frgwf.
* keine Ermittlung
      WHEN space.
        RAISE nobody_found.
* Ermittlung über T16fW
      WHEN '1'.
If using the T16FW-table, it should go to '1', otherwise it may that a user exit under '9' is used. So please check this.
Best wishes,
Florin

JRE System-level settings does not work - JRE1.6.30

Good day,
I need to set deployment.security.mixcode parameter to "DISABLE" within of deployment.properties configuration file.
Also I wish to place the deployment.properties configuration file is not user-specific path. The default location is
<User Application Data Folder>\Sun\Java\Deployment\deployment.properties.
TO change the default location I read about possibility to use the deployment.config for specifying the System-Level
deployment.properties in the infrastructure.
Unfortunatelly seems does not work. Someone have got experience about system level settings of deployment.properties?
This is the configuration I have used.
deployment.config:
deployment.system.config.mandatory=FALSE
deployment.system.config=file/:C:\Program Files\Java\jre6\lib\deployment.properties
deployment.properties:
#deployment.properties
#Fri Feb 17 15:54:57 CET 2012
deployment.version=6.0
deployment.capture.mime.types=true
deployment.browser.path=C\:\\Program Files\\Internet Explorer\\iexplore.exe
#Java Deployment jre's
#Fri Feb 17 15:54:57 CET 2012
deployment.javaws.jre.0.product=1.6.0_31
deployment.javaws.jre.0.registered=true
deployment.javaws.jre.0.osname=Windows
deployment.javaws.jre.0.platform=1.6
deployment.javaws.jre.0.path=C\:\\Program Files\\Java\\jre6\\bin\\javaw.exe
deployment.javaws.jre.0.location=http\://java.sun.com/products/autodl/j2se
deployment.javaws.jre.0.enabled=true
deployment.javaws.jre.0.osarch=x86
deployment.security.mixcode=DISABLE <<====
Thank you in advance
Adriano C.
Edited by: user12025469 on Feb 20, 2012 6:23 AM
Edited by: user12025469 on Feb 20, 2012 7:48 AM

user12025469 wrote:
This is the configuration I have used.
deployment.config:
deployment.system.config.mandatory=FALSE
deployment.system.config=file/:C:\Program Files\Java\jre6\lib\deployment.propertiesHm, try using a file URL like this:
file\:C:/Program Files/Java/jre6/lib/deployment.propertiesI believe that the file is interpreted as a properties file, which means the colon and slashes need to be escaped. This would be it if you want to use a proper Windows path:
file\:C:\\Program Files\\Java\\jre6\\lib\\deployment.properties

GPP item-level targeting filter not working as expected

I am trying to set the Internet Explorer homepage via user Group Policy Preferences (GPP) registry setting for a very specific group of users. I am using item-level targeting to accomplish this but am having trouble getting the logic working as expected.
Here is my item-level targeting filter:
The user is a member of the security group CONTOSO\FireRescueDept
AND this collection is false
The user is a member of the security group CONTOSO\EmergencyManagementDept
OR the user is a member of the security group CONTOSO\PublicSafetyDivision
The user in question is a member of both CONTOSO\FireRescueDept and CONTOSO\EmergencyManagementDept. I believe this means that this particular registry GPP setting should NOT apply to the user in question and that is the outcome I desire.
Here is how I'm thinking about it:
The user is a member of CONTOSO\EmergencyManagementDept; therefore, "The user is a member of the security group CONTOSO\EmergencyManagementDept" evaluates to TRUE.
Since the other item in the collection is connected with the boolean OR operator, the collection evaluates to TRUE regardless of the evaluation of "The user is a member of the security group CONTOSO\PublicSafetyDivision."
The item-level targeting filter is looking for the collection to evaluate to FALSE. Since the collection has evaluated to TRUE, the evaluation "This collection is false" is FALSE.
Because of the AND operator in front of "This collection is false", both "The user is a member of the security group CONTOSO\FireRescueDept" and "This collection is false" must evaluate to TRUE in order for the item-level targeting
filter to determine that the user in question to apply the GPP setting the filter is attached to. However, since "This collection is false" has already evaluated to FALSE, the filter as a whole should evaluate to FALSE and this GPP setting
should not apply.
However, according to gpresult it does apply.
Please advise. I want this particular setting to apply to users in the CONTOSO\FireRescueDept group unless they are a member of CONTOSO\EmergencyManagementDept and/or CONTOSO\PublicSafetyDivision.

Am 21.05.2013 16:22, schrieb Scott W. Sander:
> Does item-level targeting not work with Universal security groups
> because the group policy client isn't able to determine that the user
> is a member of groups of that type?
In my experience, it DOES work with universal groups... Are you
suffering from token bloat? How many groups is the user a member of?
http://blogs.technet.com/b/shanecothran/archive/2010/07/16/maxtokensize-and-kerberos-token-bloat.aspx
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
Wenn meine Antwort hilfreich war, freue ich mich über eine Bewertung! If my answer was helpful, I'm glad about a rating!

Level 1 Alerts Not Working On BB Pearl.......Please help!

Hi all,
I used to have level 1 alerts on my BB to notify me of special emails that I needed to respond to urgently. Recently my company got acquired and we changed over to a new Exchange Server with a new Enterprise Activation (which wiped my BB completely before restoring all the data again).
In the process, I lost all my level 1 alerts. I installed Desktop Manager (4.2) and tried to setup again using my old .rfi files but this has not worked. The Desktop Manager confirms all ok but when I test my BB does nothing at all. Originally I would have had a special tone (Sonar, I love that tone! Sad I know!) and the BB would vibrate and the messages would be in RED. Now, nothing happens. I have set the level 1 messages to Sonar & Vibrate but nothing happens (and it's not on mute!).
I have also downloaded Desktop Manager 5.0 to see if that does anything but that's not working either.
I'm hoping that someone else has had this issue in the past and has overcome it by doing something simple that I have overlooked. Can anyone help? I'm quite desperate.
Many thanks for your help.

You might wanna search for the thread where I asked for a SelctCmDevices example.. then use that as a starting point. That's how I finally managed to get things working on my CCM 5.1 and 6.1.

Level 1 Notification Not working on Folder Emails.

Hello Everyone
I am in a strange situation where my Level 1 Notification doesnt work.
Not working.
1. If there is an email which comes into my inbox and if there is a rule which is set on my Lotus Domino (Desktop) to save a copy in lets says XYZ folder then the filter added on my BB doesnt works.
2. If i sync a paticular folder of Lotus Domino (Desktop) I am able to see the emails in that folder however if I set a Level 1 notification on these emails then those emails are just getting red with 1 vibrate and no sound ( no matter what tone i choose ).
Working :
1. Level 1 notification set on paticular email address ( if there is no filter criteria set on Desktop ).
To better make you understand i have a Automatic folder on my desktop where all priority tickets emails comes 4,3,2,1 however if its 1 it gets copied to Sev1 folder. Now i am trying to sync this Sev1 folder on my BB so that whever there is Sev 1 ticket opened i get a notification but this bugger is just getting red and no sound.
Guys Please help !! Any suggestion would be appreciated

Instructions for Level 1 Priority Messages and Notifications are here
http://docs.blackberry.com/en/smartphone_users/deliverables/61550/mwa1372084676021.jsp
and
http://helpblog.blackberry.com/2014/03/how-to-create-a-level-1-alert-using-blackberry-10-os-version-...
Mike

Level Tool is not working

Hey I am trying to adjust the noise level with the level tool but its not working. I move the arrows every which way see that it changes. I get it to were i want it them press ok and it only cheanges a little bit. It become what it was in the preivew. The level tool works when I add it as a new ajustment layer but I don't want like that I want to be able to copy the new level of noise I just made and can't if I add new adjustment. what should I do to fix this? O and this is the trial version and It wasn't wroking eailer with lots of other tool but i uninstalled it and now they are working except the level tool how I want it to.

To see actual adjustments, especially on a detailed, high contrast image like noise, you need to view at 100% (Actual Pixels)

Two level approval workflow not working

Hi Experts,
I am making a workflow which have two level approval , now the problem is that the first level approver is going only to workflow initiator and if I use any other ID it is not working , it just hangs there.
Secondly if I send the first approval to workflow Initiator and it approves it then it hangs with second decision step.
I have made the agent assignment as general task. I have also checked SWU3 and all the things in that are activated.
Kindly help me in this issue.
Edited by: Rachit Khanna on Aug 19, 2009 9:51 AM

Dear Rachit,
There is a dedicated forum for Workflow i.e. SAP Business Workflow
Post your thread there, you will get fast response.
I can suggest you one thing check the agent assignment is done or not
Regards,
Chandra

Dunning - 2nd level dunning is not working

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for