Duplex mismatch problem

Hi,
I have connectivity like this:
customer switch forced to 100Mbps/Full duplex----------My end ME-3400-24TS-D configured for Auto negotiation.
ME-3400 negotiating with 100Mbps/Half duplex.
Customer facing CRC. Forced ME-3400 to 100Mbps/Full duplex, but link is not coming up.
ME-3400 IOS is me340x-metroaccess-mz.122-44.SE.bin
Is it bug related issue?
Regards
SKRAO

Hi guys,
I´ve been having the same problem whe trying to bring up a link between a gigabitethernet port using the UTP connector and a fastethernet port on a Huawei SW...the only way it works in full duplex /100 is when both sides are auto.
any idea whats the cause of this behavior?

Similar Messages

Duplex Printing Problem - Word 2007, Vista and HP Officejet Pro L7780

I'm having trouble with duplex printing on my new HP Officejet Pro L7780, from Word 2007, running on a brand new Vista system. I've also had this same problem (repeatable) with two other computers, running XP Professional/Word 2003, XP Home/Word 2003. All of the service packs have been installed for the operating system, word, and printer.
If you print a landscape document, using the auto duplex setting for the HP printer, the margins will print out offset by .25 inches, on the left and rigt margins. So if your margin is 1 inches on right and left, the margins will print to .75 on one side and 1.25 on the other. This would be annoying, except that I'm trying to print brochures and books, which requires that the pages print out exactly as set up... "close enough" isn't working for me
The way I have replicated this problem is as follows: set up a document in landscape format, using the default margins. Insert an image on page one, size it so it takes the full margin area. On the second page, fill it up with text. Print the document, selecting the printer properties and setting Print on Both Sides=Automatic. The easiest way see the problem is by holding the document up to the light. The front and back margins should match and they don't.
Any help you can provide would be very much appreciated.
Diana

Diana,
This problem is perhaps much larger than you might have imagined. We have tried to work with Hewlett Packard for over two years on the duplex printing problems. In the process, we have expended over 100 hours of effort in troubleshooting the problem which has included updating software, reinstalling software, developing test documents, escalating issues, submitting technical findings, and in purchasing replacements. Unfortunately, our efforts to interact with Hewlett Packard excalated support have resulted in an aire of apathy, disinterest, incompetence, frustration, redundancy, occasional discourtesy, and an outright lack of professional decorum - something inconceivable of a large, reputable company.
We have identified several problems with duplex printing. The duplex printing problems include irregular margin increases (.25 to .50 inch), margin shifts, cut-off text, compressed text, and compressed graphics. Please note that most of these problems are only evident when printing documents from computer applications to the printer. If the user simply uses the front printer panel to copy in duplex mode, these problems are not always evident. This suggests that the printer mechanics are capable of properly duplexing and that the problem lies in the drivers.
The problem is evident on the HP OfficeJet Pro L7780, Photosmart L7180, Photosmart C6150, Photosmart 3310, and likely on many, many other HP models. The problem is evident on many computers (HP, IBM, Toshiba, and Dell), is evident in multiple applicatons (Word, Wordperfect, Excel, Peachtree, Notepad, and many more), and is evident on multiple operating systems (Windows XP Home, Windows XP Professional, Windows XP Media Center Edition, and Microsoft Vista).
We consider ourselves to be extremely polite, patient individuals, but have nearly been driven to outrage by the indignant disregard offered us by HP's escalation support department; a department which should represent the cream-of-the-crop in both service and technical expertise. Given the ease with which the problem can be duplicated, we expected an extremely quick resolution by HP who, to our knowledge, has never even made the effort to duplicate the problem in-house on our behalf.
Ironically, HP highly advertises their J.D. Powers rated technical support, yet it appears that they actually have extremely poor published consumer rankings in some of today's mainstream computer magazines. HP technical support makes no apologies for the fact the user cannot use a major feature of their printers, offers no indication that the problem is even being addressed, and off-loads the responsibility by suggesting that we contact Microsoft (who is to blame for this issue).
Thank you, Diane, for your message. We had a hard time imagining that we were the only one experiencing this problem, especially when HP promotes such a representation. Which also begs the question why HP plays like the problem does not even exist? I also fail to understand why HP technical support shows so little interest in a problem that is easily duplicated and adversely affects a major feature of the printer which is commonly used by individuals purchasing equipment for its duplex capabilities.
This is sad because we have been a loyal customer of HP for over twenty-five years. There was a time when we would have happily endorsed HP's steller products and steller support (provided you could get a problem escalated). Now, however, they all-too-often appear to offer equipment that fails to support advertised features which is backed up by sub-standard support and extremely expensive ink. This is an especially sad commentary for users who are buying HP's upper-end printers and computers.
We desire to know if there are others out there experiencing similar problems? If you have experienced these problems or would like samples of the problems we have duplicated, please respond. I think the more information we gather, the better our chance of a successful resolution to a serious problem.
Thanks Everyone!

WLC 5508 duplex mismatch error

Hi I've got a WLC 5508 connected to a Catalyst 6000 switch. In the switch I've get a CDP duplex mismatch error every 30 min.
%CDP-4-DUPLEXMISMATCH:Full/half duplex mismatch detected on port 3/23
with the show port command I can see this:
Port Name                 Status     Vlan       Duplex Speed       Type
3/23 WLC           connected trunk        full        1000 10/100/1000
With the show CDP neigh I see a duplex mismatch
C6K9> (enable) sh cdp neig 3/23 detail
Port (Our Port): 3/23
Holdtime: 142 sec
Capabilities: HOST
Version:
Manufacturer's Name: Cisco Systems Inc. Product Name: Cisco Controller Product Version: 7.0.116.0 RTOS Version: Erro Bootloader Version: 1.0.1 Build Type: DATA + WPS
Platform: AIR-CT5508-K9
Port-ID (Port on Neighbors's Device): GigabitEthernet0/0/1
VTP Management Domain: unknown
Native VLAN: unknown
Duplex: half (Mismatch)
But in the WLC console there is not half duplex
(WLC5508) show>port 1
           STP   Admin   Physical   Physical   Link   Link
Pr Type   Stat   Mode     Mode      Status   Status Trap     POE    SFPType
1 Normal Forw Enable Auto       1000 Full Up     Enable N/A     1000BaseTX
I don't have errors in the port counters
How I can resolve this duplex mismatch?

Try upgrading the firmware of the WLC to 7.0.230.0.

Data Mismatch problem in Production system

Dear Experts,
We have been encountering serious data mismatch problems with our source system since 29th Dec 2010.
We have realized this mismatch only on 11th Jan 2011. So, we have deleted entire data from 29th Dec 2010 onwards to 11th Jan 2011. Then we tried to load delta again as per our Process Chain sequence. Since then, our production system has become very inconsistent. We found that the entire data from 29th Dec 2010 to till date is started giving mismatch.
Our system got damaged in terms of data drastically. If I delete any bad requests from our Cubes & Data Store Objects, the next time when we try to load data, cube & Data Store Objects is showing the deleted request no. is not updated properly. Because of this, our Process chain is daily failing to complete and giving so many technical errors. We are totally confused to restore our data from 29th Dec 2010 to till date.
Can any one please help us to restore our data fully and Process Chain to run successfully...............?
Thanks in Advance,
Suman

Hi Suman,
I understood that you are using 3.x version of BW
such kind of issues occurs if you distrub the delta sequence by deleting the requests without making them red.
you can resolve this two ways......
1) Go to reconstruction tab of the DSO and CUBE, select all the req from 29th Dec 2010 thru 11th Jan 2011 and reconstruct them. once they appear in the request tab. make all the requests to red (set the QM status to RED) one by one and delete them from the CUBE and DSO.
This should set the delta status back to 29th and you will be able to run a repeat delta from then in your next delta.
2) Go to RSRQ and give the SID or the Request ID one by one that it is giving you ( request no. which is not updated properly)
Mke the QM status as RED for all of them.
Since you have already deleted them from the targets, just changing the QM status to RED will be sufficinet.
You have make the QM status to RED inorder to inform the system that the requset is incorrect one and has been deleted.
Once it is set to RED, system will not prompt any req and say "request no.# not updated properly".
i suggest you the second option.
Once you resume the delta load, it should run successfully.....and if you feel some data is still missing from 29th Dec 2010 thru 11th Jan 2011, just run a full repair load the get the data back.
If your Datasource is of LO extraction u may need to fill the setup tables to perform full repair.
Please let me know if the Datasource is of LO extraction. Also let me know once the issue is resolved.
Regards,
Sudheer.
Edited by: Sudheer Kumar Kurra on Jan 22, 2011 7:58 AM
Edited by: Sudheer Kumar Kurra on Jan 22, 2011 8:03 AM

Duplex mismatch between N7k and 5508

Hi All,
I met a duplex mismatch issue in our new DC.
The port configuration on the N7k and controller is the same as in other DC
Only difference is version of the NxOS on the N7k.
On N7k 5.2(1) works
On N7k 5.2(7) i get below logs :
2013 Aug 21 22:23:24 xxx %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: Duplex mismatch discovered on Ethernet10/8, with LAGInterface0/3/1
2013 Aug 21 22:24:24 xxx last message repeated 8 times
2013 Aug 21 22:25:24 xxx last message repeated 8 times
2013 Aug 21 22:27:24 xxx last message repeated 16 times
2013 Aug 21 22:29:24 xxx last message repeated 16 times
Port configuration :
interface Ethernet10/8
description WLC 5508-1
switchport
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan 50
switchport trunk allowed vlan 50,500,570
spanning-tree port type edge trunk
channel-group 1100
no shutdown
xxx# sh int e 10/8
Ethernet10/8 is up
Dedicated Interface
Belongs to Po1100
Hardware: 10/100/1000 Ethernet, address: 0006.f6b1.d2f7 (bia 0006.f6b1.d2f7)
Description:WLC 5508-1
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA
Port mode is trunk
full-duplex, 1000 Mb/s
Controller 5508 version 7.3.112.0
Controller ports :
Port Summary
           STP   Admin   Physical   Physical   Link   Link
Pr Type   Stat   Mode     Mode      Status   Status Trap     POE    SFPType
1 Normal Forw Enable Auto       1000 Full Up     Enable N/A     1000BaseTX
2 Normal Forw Enable Auto       1000 Full Up     Enable N/A     1000BaseTX
3 Normal Forw Enable Auto       1000 Full Up     Enable N/A     1000BaseTX
4 Normal Forw Enable Auto       1000 Full Up     Enable N/A     1000BaseTX
How can i fix this issue ? Ports are set up and show the same - 1000 / Full
the messages are annoying as loggs are almost full of them.
Thank you in advance

Hi Matthew,
The issue is related to bug -> "CDP duplex mismatch when using LAG on 5508 & 8510 WLC” (CSCuc94082)
The fastest way to solve (workaround) this is disable cdp on the controller by executing following command: config cdp advertise-v2 disable
Hope this helped you
Regards,
Radek

LINK DUPLEX MISMATCH error

Hi all,
i am using cisco LMS 3.2 as when we run the Discripencies Report we get the
Error of LINK DUPLEX MISMATCH....
Kindly guide for the same....
This link has ports with mismatching duplex.
Port GigabitEthernet0/23 on device MKT_1 with mode auto-duplex
Device type and OS version of MKT_1:
Cisco IOS Software, C3560E Software (C3560E-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(53)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Port GigabitEthernet0/1 on device MKT_3 with mode full-duplex This link has ports with mismatching duplex.
Port GigabitEthernet0/23 on device MKT with mode auto-duplex
Device type and OS version of MKT_1:
Cisco IOS Software, C3560E Software (C3560E-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(53)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Port GigabitEthernet0/1 on device MKT_3 with mode full-duplex
But when i check the configuration of both switches it shows as FULL DUPLEX for the above....
Kindly guide how to resolve the above error....

This is a known issue with ports set to auto-duplex. Since the switches do not reflect the current operational duplex, LMS does not know if the port negotiated to full or half. In that case, it presents the warning so you can investigate. Once you've confirmed the duplex is correct, you can acknowledge the discrepancy.
If you upgrade your switches to 12.2(55)SE, then the switch will report the operational duplex, and this discrepancy will go away on its own. The bug that fixed this was CSCtc12593

Duplex Mismatch when connecting ip phone with 2950 switch

When I connect my Cisco IP Phone 7960 with 2950 Switch (any access port within voice vlan), I get the message on Port duplex mismatch but the phone works properly.
From my switch the speed setting is 100/Full but from the Phone its Auto.
My Question is when I try to change duplex settings from Phone, it doesn't gives me any option instead only one option available to save so kindly someone tell me the best way to fix this from Phone or do I have to change the duplex from switch to AUTO ?

Thanks but When I connect with my Cisco 2950 Switch, I can see the weird kind of language as per my attachment.
It wasn't yesterday when I first configured from scratch but just seen today.
Switch is working good with Cisco IP phone connected with it.

Duplex mismatch on phone

Hi
Can someone explain the following to me please.All our ip phones are deployed with their settings pc/sw config as auto/auto. Desktops are all on 100fullmb as are the 3750 switch ports they connect to. Mostly all is fine but sometimes I get duplex mismatches on syslog server. When I change phone settings to 100full it resolves. How come this happens on some and not others.
Also what is best practice as we are deploying in other offices now; I would have though everything set to 100full.
Thanks ,
Frank

If you manually set a port to 100/full then plug in a device set to auto/auto that device will default to 100/half. If you set one device manually you have to set whatever it connects to manually as well. Best practice is to set everything to auto negotiate and that will result in 100/full. In your case you have all devices with a duplex mismatch and you should be having lots of performance and voice quallity issues.
Take a look at this link for details on how ethernet port speed and duplex negotiation works.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/switches/ps700/products_tech_note09186a00800a7af0.shtml

XP vs W7 communications coping with duplex mismatch?!?

Whilst deploying a Windows 7 SP1 Pro Standard Operating Environment to one of our 60+ sites we were having some massive comms issues. The site is on a relatively slow (max 2Mbps link), but the difference in consistency between the former XP and
'new' W7 machines is striking
e.g. SOME W7 log in taking 40+mins (compared to XP based machine approx 2mins), RDP sessions from XP based machine fine compared to unusable from W7 machine, Lost SSL sessions on W7 machines compared to 'normal' functionality on XP machines, etc.
So, the fundamental issue appears to have been a duplex mismatch between the router (3rd party managed) and the sites 'core' switch.
However, we are struggling to understand why the W7 machines were so much more susceptible to issues compared to the XP machines... I understand that the TCP/IP stack was fundamentally rewritten between XP and Vista/W7, but can anyone point to anything that
would explain why the W7 machines exposed the issue so much more acutely?
I'd appreciate any thoughts or suggested areas of investigation?
Thanks
David

Hi,
Based on my experience, you may check the netmon traces or monitor the performan which is in the task manager.
Download Microsoft Network Monitor Tool from the following link and install it on the two machines.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyID=983b941d-06cb-4658-b7f6-3088333d062f
Best regards,
Steven Song
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Nexus 5k Throwing Duplex Mismatch error even though Duplex/speed is correct

Hello Guys
We Are facing an issue with Duplex Match. error in nexus 5k
Our Nexus 5k Switch continously throwing Duplex mismtach error on Logs.
2013 Nov 9 07:53:24 FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02 %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: Duplex mismatch discovered on Ethernet1/11, with LAGInterface0/3/1
2013 Nov 9 07:54:24 FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02 last message repeated 8 times
2013 Nov 9 07:56:24 FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02 last message repeated 16 times
2013 Nov 9 07:58:24 FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02 last message repeated 16 times
2013 Nov 9 08:00:24 FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02 last message repeated 16 times
2013 Nov 9 08:02:24 FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02 last message repeated 16 times
2013 Nov 9 08:04:24 FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02 last message repeated 16 times
2013 Nov 9 08:06:24 FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02 last message repeated 16 times
2013 Nov 9 08:08:24 FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02 last message repeated 16 times
2013 Nov 9 08:10:24 FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02 last message repeated 16 times
2013 Nov 9 08:12:24 FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02 last message repeated 16 times
2013 Nov 9 08:14:24 FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02 last message repeated 16 times
2013 Nov 9 08:16:24 FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02 last message repeated 16 times
2013 Nov 9 08:18:22 FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02 last message repeated 15 times
The interface is connected to Cisco Wireless lan controller(5508) using port-channel. Other interface in Port channel is not facing an Issue.
This interface is hardcoded with Speed 1000. Same config on WLC also Speed 1000. No ipunt errors observed in the interfaces
But in Switch cdp this interface is showing as Half duplex and flooding the 5k with logs
Please find the Interface configs & CDP outputs,
interface port-channel124
description Controller Wireless 5508
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
speed 1000
storm-control broadcast level 80.00
storm-control multicast level 80.00
vpc 124
interface Eth 1/10 & 1/11 is binded in port channel 124.
Eth 1/10 --> dont have any Logs and showing full duplex in CDP.
Eth 1/11 --> Having Logs for duplex mismtach and showing half duplex
interface Ethernet1/10
description Controller Wireless 5508 - Port 1
switchport mode trunk
speed 1000
storm-control broadcast level 80.00
storm-control multicast level 80.00
channel-group 124
interface Ethernet1/11
description Controller Wireless 5508 - Port 2
switchport mode trunk
speed 1000
storm-control broadcast level 80.00
storm-control multicast level 80.00
channel-group 124
FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02# sh int eth 1/10
Ethernet1/10 is up
Hardware: 1000/10000 Ethernet, address: 547f.ee33.d031 (bia 547f.ee33.d031)
Description: Controller Wireless 5508 - Port 1 - 10.80.82.240
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA
Port mode is trunk
full-duplex, 1000 Mb/s, media type is 10G
Beacon is turned off
Input flow-control is off, output flow-control is off
Rate mode is dedicated
Switchport monitor is off
EtherType is 0x8100
Last link flapped 16week(s) 6day(s)
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 35w2d
30 seconds input rate 6194968 bits/sec, 1211 packets/sec
30 seconds output rate 4498096 bits/sec, 1189 packets/sec
Load-Interval #2: 5 minute (300 seconds)
    input rate 4.81 Mbps, 875 pps; output rate 3.60 Mbps, 863 pps
RX
    2055924941 unicast packets 547924 multicast packets 1043625 broadcast pack
ets
    2057516490 input packets 1047388804413 bytes
    82164348 jumbo packets 0 storm suppression bytes
    0 runts 0 giants 0 CRC 0 no buffer
    0 input error 0 short frame 0 overrun   0 underrun 0 ignored
    0 watchdog 0 bad etype drop 0 bad proto drop 0 if down drop
    0 input with dribble 0 input discard
    0 Rx pause
TX
    2407546704 unicast packets 558419255 multicast packets 2765961466 broadcas
t packets
    5731927425 output packets 1625683967743 bytes
    342983729 jumbo packets
    0 output errors 0 collision 0 deferred 0 late collision
    0 lost carrier 0 no carrier 0 babble 0 output discard
    0 Tx pause
2 interface resets
FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02# sh int eth 1/11
Ethernet1/11 is up
Hardware: 1000/10000 Ethernet, address: 547f.ee33.d032 (bia 547f.ee33.d032)
Description: Controller Wireless 5508 - Port 2 - 10.80.82.240
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA
Port mode is trunk
full-duplex, 1000 Mb/s, media type is 10G
Beacon is turned off
Input flow-control is off, output flow-control is off
Rate mode is dedicated
Switchport monitor is off
EtherType is 0x8100
Last link flapped 16week(s) 6day(s)
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 35w2d
30 seconds input rate 2059992 bits/sec, 712 packets/sec
30 seconds output rate 3605536 bits/sec, 680 packets/sec
Load-Interval #2: 5 minute (300 seconds)
    input rate 1.44 Mbps, 485 pps; output rate 2.73 Mbps, 546 pps
RX
    1742986162 unicast packets 712358 multicast packets 1587374 broadcast pack
ets
    1745285894 input packets 813329974630 bytes
    107173365 jumbo packets 0 storm suppression bytes
    0 runts 0 giants 0 CRC 0 no buffer
    0 input error 0 short frame 0 overrun   0 underrun 0 ignored
    0 watchdog 0 bad etype drop 0 bad proto drop 0 if down drop
    0 input with dribble 0 input discard
    0 Rx pause
TX
    1347189732 unicast packets 337957710 multicast packets 2429529386 broadcas
t packets
    4114676828 output packets 1302894776466 bytes
    308726768 jumbo packets
    0 output errors 0 collision 0 deferred 0 late collision
    0 lost carrier 0 no carrier 0 babble 0 output discard
    0 Tx pause
3 interface resets
FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02# sh cdp neighbors interface ethernet 1/11 detail
Device ID:FRMA_BK2_WLCCS5508_01_100
System Name:
Interface address(es):
    IPv4 Address: 10.80.82.240
Platform: AIR-CT5508-K9, Capabilities: Host
Interface: Ethernet1/11, Port ID (outgoing port): LAGInterface0/3/1
Holdtime: 136 sec
Version:
Manufacturer's Name: Cisco Systems Inc. Product Name: Cisco Controller Product
Version: 7.0.240.0 RTOS Version: Erro Bootloader Version: 1.0.1 Build Type:
DATA + WPS + LDPE
Advertisement Version: 2
Duplex: half
Device ID:FRMA_BK2_WLCCS5508_01_100
System Name:
Interface address(es):
    IPv4 Address: 10.80.82.240
Platform: AIR-CT5508-K9, Capabilities: Host
Interface: Ethernet1/11, Port ID (outgoing port): GigabitEthernet0/0/2
Holdtime: 136 sec
Version:
Manufacturer's Name: Cisco Systems Inc. Product Name: Cisco Controller Product
Version: 7.0.240.0 RTOS Version: Erro Bootloader Version: 1.0.1 Build Type:
DATA + WPS + LDPE
Advertisement Version: 2
Duplex: full
FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02# sh cdp neighbors interface ethernet 1/10 detail
Device ID:FRMA_BK2_WLCCS5508_01_100
System Name:
Interface address(es):
    IPv4 Address: 10.80.82.240
Platform: AIR-CT5508-K9, Capabilities: Host
Interface: Ethernet1/10, Port ID (outgoing port): GigabitEthernet0/0/1
Holdtime: 138 sec
Version:
Manufacturer's Name: Cisco Systems Inc. Product Name: Cisco Controller Product
Version: 7.0.240.0 RTOS Version: Erro Bootloader Version: 1.0.1 Build Type:
DATA + WPS + LDPE
Advertisement Version: 2
Duplex: full
From WLC Controller end
(Cisco Controller) >show port summary
           STP   Admin   Physical   Physical   Link   Link
Pr Type   Stat   Mode     Mode      Status   Status Trap     POE    SFPType
1 Normal Forw Enable Auto       1000 Full Up     Enable N/A     1000BaseTX
2 Normal Forw Enable Auto       1000 Full Up     Enable N/A     1000BaseTX
What might be the issue here?
Thanks for your suggstion

Hi Grant,
Thanks for your sugggestions.But however we Have 6 Controllers, all are having the same setup as this one.
Only difference i seen for this switch is for the th port 1/11 it is showling 2 CDP info, one for management interface of WLC and other for Logical interface of WLC, which seems not correct.
Ths CDP info connecting to Logical interface is showing half duplex and cdp info connecting to Physical interface of wlc is showing full duplex.
FRMA_BK2_CSN5K_02# sh cdp neighbors int eth 1/11 detail
Device ID:FRMA_BK2_WLCCS5508_01_100
System Name:
Interface address(es):
    IPv4 Address: 10.80.82.240
Platform: AIR-CT5508-K9, Capabilities: Host
Interface: Ethernet1/11, Port ID (outgoing port): LAGInterface0/3/1
Holdtime: 125 sec
Version:
Manufacturer's Name: Cisco Systems Inc. Product Name: Cisco Controller Product
Version: 7.0.240.0 RTOS Version: Erro Bootloader Version: 1.0.1 Build Type:
DATA + WPS + LDPE
Advertisement Version: 2
Duplex: half
Device ID:FRMA_BK2_WLCCS5508_01_100
System Name:
Interface address(es):
    IPv4 Address: 10.80.82.240
Platform: AIR-CT5508-K9, Capabilities: Host
Interface: Ethernet1/11, Port ID (outgoing port): GigabitEthernet0/0/2
Holdtime: 125 sec
Version:
Manufacturer's Name: Cisco Systems Inc. Product Name: Cisco Controller Product
Version: 7.0.240.0 RTOS Version: Erro Bootloader Version: 1.0.1 Build Type:
DATA + WPS + LDPE
Advertisement Version: 2
Duplex: full

%CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/0 (not full duplex) between Router and switch

On Router
rAWKRdae01 uptime is 1 day, 23 hours, 47 minutes
System returned to ROM by power-on
System restarted at 06:13:17 GMT Wed Aug 13 2014
System image file is "flash:c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-15.T9.bin"
interface FastEthernet0/0
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
end
Logs
================================
034146: Aug 15 05:55:40.231 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/0 (not full duplex), with sALKRdae01.baxter.com GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (full duplex).
034147: Aug 15 05:56:40.228 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/0 (not full duplex), with sALKRdae01.baxter.com GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (full duplex).
034148: Aug 15 05:57:04.420 UTC: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list SecureInternet denied udp 192.230.123.37(53) -> 119.201.190.90(44014), 1 packet
034149: Aug 15 05:57:40.229 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/0 (not full duplex), with sALKRdae01.baxter.com GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (full duplex).
034150: Aug 15 05:58:40.230 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/0 (not full duplex), with sALKRdae01.baxter.com GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (full duplex).
034151: Aug 15 05:59:40.227 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/0 (not full duplex), with sALKRdae01.baxter.com GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (full duplex).
034152: Aug 15 06:00:05.707 UTC: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list SecureInternet denied tcp 60.169.77.13(6000) -> 119.201.190.90(8088), 1 packet
034153: Aug 15 06:00:27.476 UTC: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list SecureInternet denied tcp 109.120.169.206(80) -> 112.217.135.50(11), 1 packet
034154: Aug 15 06:00:40.224 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/0 (not full duplex), with sALKRdae01.baxter.com GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (full duplex).
034155: Aug 15 06:01:40.225 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/0 (not full duplex), with sALKRdae01.baxter.com GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (full duplex).
================================
On Switch
interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1
description connection to rAWKRdae01
switchport trunk native vlan 100
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100
switchport mode trunk
load-interval 30
speed 100
duplex full
service-policy output 3850_QUEUE_2P6Q3T
end
Log:
=================================
000440: Aug 15 05:44:59 GMT: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (not half duplex), with rAWKRdae01.baxter.com FastEthernet0/0 (half duplex).
000441: Aug 15 05:45:59 GMT: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (not half duplex), with rAWKRdae01.baxter.com FastEthernet0/0 (half duplex).
000442: Aug 15 05:46:59 GMT: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (not half duplex), with rAWKRdae01.baxter.com FastEthernet0/0 (half duplex).
000443: Aug 15 05:47:59 GMT: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (not half duplex), with rAWKRdae01.baxter.com FastEthernet0/0 (half duplex).
000444: Aug 15 05:48:22 GMT: %SNMP-3-AUTHFAIL: Authentication failure for SNMP req from host 10.5.35.33
000445: Aug 15 05:48:59 GMT: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (not half duplex), with rAWKRdae01.baxter.com FastEthernet0/0 (half duplex).
000446: Aug 15 05:49:59 GMT: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (not half duplex), with rAWKRdae01.baxter.com FastEthernet0/0 (half duplex).
000447: Aug 15 05:50:59 GMT: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/1/1 (not half duplex), with rAWKRdae01.baxter.com FastEthernet0/0 (half duplex).
==================================
I did try to change duplex setting on fa0/0 of router to Full, but the interface went down and I lost the connectivity to the switch.

> I did try to change duplex setting on fa0/0 of router to Full, but the interface went down and I lost the connectivity to the switch.
Did you wait some time to let the divices reestablish the connection again?
I would configure the Switchport to auto/auto in that case. Autonegotiation works (most of the times ;-) ).

Duplex printing problem with hp 9500 (right side always just half printed)

Since OS X 10.6 was released there is a problem with the print out of duplex printed pages (specially via Indesign CS4 broschure printing function). Using Mac OS X 10.5.8 with old and new driver everything is fine - but under 10.6, 10.6.1 or 10.6.2 neither old nor one of the new driver releases 2.1, 2.2 or 2.3 will work.
When I´m trying to print a duplex printing page the print of the right page will be cutted off at the half of the page - like the page would not print A3 horizontally but vertically (so the rest is cut off). The new print features within the printing menu (manual duplex print and print broschure will have same effect but with a strange miniaturization to A5 - although it should be A4). All in all the is no way to print out a duplex printing with OS X 10.6 and hp 9500. Will there be any solution in sight? Are there other with the same effect?

I have an identical issue to neuegestaltung, but with an HP 5500. I can print single-sided to A3/tabloid successfully but when I try printing duplex the right quarter of the page is cut off on both sides - almost as if it thinks it's printing portrait.
Applications affected include Adobe Acrobat 8 and 9, Adobe CS3 and CS4 applications including InDesign.
Preview works fine, but of course the colour balance makes the output unusable.
OS 10.6.2, print driver HP Color LaserJet 5500 v 3010.107.
Using the Gutenprint driver I can't either do A3 or colour so there is no solution there.
Worked fully and correctly with the same apps under 10.5.x.
At the moment I am running Windows XP under VMWare to print from Acrobat, which is plainly silly.
Any useful* observations, suggestions or workarounds welcome.
*Needless to say, "It's Adobe's problem" or similar are not acceptable responses. It may well be an interaction between the Adobe's applications and Apple's printing system and/or driver of course; in that case the companies need to collaborate to solve the issue.

Tabloid duplex printing problem from CS4 (Acrobat and InDesign)

I cannot print a two-page tabloid (landscape mode) pdf document properly from a MacBook Pro or a Mac Pro running 10.6.2 using Adobe Products (Acrobat 8 or 9, or InDesign CS3 or CS4) to an HP LJ5550DN. The printed version prints on both sides of the paper, but the right 1/4 of each page doesn't print. Furthermore, if I reboot and print just one side, it prints fine, but when I select duplex I get this problem and if I try to print just one side again, it prints w/o the 1/4 of the right side of the paper.
I can print the tabloid duplex correctly using Preview on the same computers. I can also print correctly using Acrobat 7 from a Mac G4 running Mac OS 10.4.11. I can print a single tabloid sheet correctly from Illustrator CS3 or CS4 from the Snow Leopard computers, but since Illustrator doesn't handle more than one page, can't send it duplex.
I conclude that the problem is the Adobe software under Snow Leopard. If you know what is wrong with the Adobe software, please send me the fix - it would streamline the process.

I'm having exactly the same problem, with a 5500dn. As with you, the problem is present in both CS3 and Acrobat 8 and 9, and I can print a duplex A3/tabloid PDF correctly with Preview. (only the colour balance is rubbish!)
Mac OS 10.6.2, print driver HP Color Laserjet 5500 v3010.107 (although it's obviously not the driver).
Needless to say, any solution to this needs to address CS3 and later apps.
Bug report filed.
Thanks,
--Richard E

C9295A Duplex Printing Problem

I have been successfully using the C9295A (Officeject 6000, E609n) wireless printer for eleven months. Set up wireless, connected with win 7 PCs and laptop. Primarily used for duplex printing and has worked very well.
Several weeks ago it started having errors when printing, almost exclusively when trying to use the duplex printing. The first page would print normally while the second side would print only about the bottom inch. Each time it failed there was an error showing in the print queue (Error: Sent to Printer) and subsequent print jobs would fail until that was cleared. Didn't matter which machine I used. Connected with ethernet and had the same problem. Used with wired PC and ethernet and still had the same problem.
Used downloaded printer troubleshooter and network troubleshooters from HP. They did not detect problems. Reinstalled software on two machines with no change. Had a network port error after that, but said to reboot and try again and it passed. Printer is set up on a WDS port.
I did notice that if I printed a large job (say 10 pages) with duplex it would print most of it correctly. Have also had some failures where a single page would fail, usually when printing graphics.
I can't seem to find my specific failure in any of the troubleshooting pages. I have seen the same symptom in some older posts concerning IE8 printing but I use firefox. Also the problem is the same whether from Word, a PDF document or a browser.
Has anyone seen a similar problem?Kind of seems like it is having problems keeping the info in memory in the printer. Is that possible?
Lastly, I haven't yet figured out how I get help with my printer under warranty. The HP site just keeps sending me back to troubleshooting pages. They don't recognize my serial number (even though it is registered) and their program to detect it fails. When I tried to use the "contact by email" link it just brought me back to the "check warranty" page which, of course, fails. Anyone have any insight there?
Can't believe I worked for this company for 29 years and still can't figure out their website - guess it doesn't say much for the "ease of use".
bobf

Again, thanks. I also contacted Canon and they suggested I delete the driver and reinstall from their website. I did that it worked.
For anyone with a similar problem here is the link and instructions from Canon:
Remove the current driver from printers and scanners. Highlight the MX920 series and click the -. Download the latest driver from our support site.
http://www.canon.co.uk/Support/Consumer_Products/products/Fax__Multifunctionals/ InkJet/PIXMA_MX_series/MX925.aspx?DLtcmuri=tcm:14-1099303&page=1&type=download
Install the driver and add the printer in printers and scanners. When you select the MX920 series printer confirm that MX920 is listed under “print using” and then add. When this is complete, try to print.

HP Photosmart C410a All-in-One: Duplex Printing Problem

I just purchased an HP Photosmart Premium Fax C410a ePrinter. My operating system is Windows 7.
All went well until I tried duplex printing of a document. It printed alright, but extra margin space (a good 1/2 inch) was inserted like a border at the top and bottom (but not the sides) of both front and back of each page. This squeezing of the text causes the font size to be reduced and leaves undesirable white space. This happens with both manual and automatic duplex printing.
I spent hours chatting and talking with HP support technicians while they tried many things to solve the problem, all to no avail. They suggested I return the printer and get another one, which I did, but the second one has the same problem.
Has anybody out there run into this problem with the C410? I would appreciate any help I could get, including from someone at HP. I strongly suspect this is a defect in the software.

One of the common issues with automatic duplexing, is the requirement of increased margins due to the way that the process works. It is not a defect, it is simply the way that the process needs to ensure print quality when auto duplexing. In contrast, manual duplexing does not have the same needs, as it draws directly from the tray. From testing of other brands, I can say that I have seen the margin issue occur with other manufacturers as well. Seems to be a necessary evil when auto duplexing.
007OHMSS
I was a support engineer for HP.
If the advice resolved the situation, please mark it as a solution. Thank you.

Duplex mismatch problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for