Duplicate Message ID issue in case of Multi mapping (without BPM)

Hi Experts,
I am doing one sample Example for my requirement of converting the single source message data into the multiple Target messages.
for example, when sender system is sending the 5 sale order details into a single message in PI then my Inbound proxy class of ECC R/3 receiver system must get this sale orders separately, that means inbound proxy class method must be triggered separately for 5 sale orders from sender system. for achieving this, I have used the Multi mapping concept in ESR (without BPM).
This scenario is in Asynchronous mode.
The below screen shots give the details on what I have configures so far.
IN ESR
IN ID
IN SXMB_MONI of PI
IN SXMB_MONI of ECC R/3 Receiver system (Error in Processing)
due to this error, inbound Proxy class method is not being triggered for the single Sale order details as well,
please let me know how to tackle this duplicate message ID issue when we have multiple payloads to process in a single message.
please also let me know if is there any other workaround to fulfil this requirement.
Thank you,
Regards,
Jagesh

Hi Nunu,
Check the below blog for restrictions.
Multi-Mapping without BPM - Yes, it’s possible!
Restrictions
Messages that result from the split in a mapping-based message split are sent using one AE. So only adapters running on the AE are supported. In particular, this means that target IDOC message splits are not supported since the IDOC adapter is not part of the AE.
Regards,
Praveen.

Similar Messages

Error in Multi-mapping without BPM

Hi frnds,
I am doing a scenario File-XI-File. I am using the multi-splitting thing in the Message mapping. I have taken care of all the occurance's and "enhanced" thing in the IR and ID resp. I m using SP16. I want to avoid BPM.
But therez sme error cming up. When I check the MONI, its shwing "No messages created from split mapping" and when I test my interface using the Test Configuration in the ID, its shwing error in the Receiver Determination -- "HTTP connection to ABAP Runtime failed. Error: 403 Forbidden"
I have checked most of the blogs and forum suggestions. I have checked the ICF activations as well ...
So, do come back to me with your valuable suggestions, and I will award them points, if they really help me out.
Thanks and regards.
Neetesh

Hi Neetesh,

When I check the MONI, its shwing "No messages created from split mapping"
For this, Can you check the source XML. Does it contain Tags like <messages> .. If yes, you need to remove them from your source XML.
If i am right, you have copied the XML from the TEST tab of the message mapping and pasted it in a notepad and saved it without making any changes at all..... Just do as i have mentioned above and i am sure you will no more get that error message in your MONI....
Also go through this weblog which talks about multi-mapping without BPM,
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
Regards,
Abhy

Multi-Mapping without BPM

Hi ,
I am following this weblog
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
but stuck up with what are the fields contained by ID in target message2 ...
Please check this for your clarification
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/1135395357/
Thanks
dushanth

ID will have only ID under it. instead of creating flat structure like the one above Jin has changed the strucutre below . you will have only ID field in it or you want u can add other fields in it .
Regards
Sreeram.G.Reddy

Multi Mapping without BPM (JMS 2 IDoc)

Hi,
i have a JMS-Query where it is necessary to map the given data to two different IDoc Types.
Therefore i have to mappings in two different namespaces. Is it possible to use these insde of the interface Mapping?! Or does the target types have to be in one mapping and one namespace?!
Can i use context objects?!
Please guide me! br, Jens

HI,
Ingeneral multi mapping in IM , we can use , to do it it should satisfies accordingly .. i mean see the below link
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/11/01/xi-xml-node-into-a-string-with-graphical-mapping
Multiple message mappings in one integration scenario
With context object , we can route based on condition , this will be used in interface determination with condition , to this condition , we can use Context object, but it should be configured in MI.
Regards
Chilla

Multi-Mapping without BPM (Multiples IDoc To one EDI output?)

Hi all,
We are currently working for a client that want us to create, based on a multiple IDoc (an idoc that contains data of more than one idoc) only one output
Meaning that we have to do a mapping that based in this multiple input generates only one output that cointains all that data in only one flat file
example:
Idoc: PERX2002.PAYTEXT generates an EDI 820 with this structure:
LIST
/S_ISA (first input)
/S_ISA (second input)
At this moment we tried to use "Collect IDoc" option in SAP, and as seen in other blogs we changed the ocurrency of the message mapping to "0.unbounded", but when we release several idocs (WE14) we only get multiples output files (3 idoc collected and released give us 3 different edi files) instead only one edi file with all the data gathered together as ISA segments
In this required process possible???
Thanks in advance

As you can see in the following pics..
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/8352/process1xz1.jpg
http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/4954/processvc9.jpg
i already made those changes, the multi-mapping is set, and also the option for collecting the IDocs and the "enhanced" option in the Integration Directory, but when i release all the idocs i still get multiple outputs (2 files), instead one file with all the gathered data
Could someone tell me if i'm missing some step?
Thanks for your time
Edited by: Alexis Alanis on Jan 7, 2008 7:24 PM

Error: 1:n multi-mapping using BPM for file to file scenario

Hi. Iu2019m trying to do 1:n multi-mapping using bpm scenario. I use file to file. Input file consists of many records and then I want many record to be transformed into many file at target system. I follow step in http://www.riyaz.net/blog/xipi-1n-multi-mapping-using-bpm/. However, I have a problem when file is retrieved in to XI. It doesnu2019t create any output file.
When I look at SXMB_MONI, it shows u201CNo object type found for the message Check that the corresponding process is activated.u201D Besides, it shows error message "Unable to perform action for selected message" when i clikc at PE in SXMB_MONI.
I have check at many previous posts with the same error message but still couldnu2019t solve it. I already activate my BPM and check that status in SXI_CACHE = 0. There is noting left in change list of my IR and ID.
Here is my design and configuration.
IR
Data Type: DT_file_split -> for both input and output file
Message Type: MT_file_split_sender, MT_file_split_receiver
Message Interface: SI_file_split_in, SI_file_split_out, SI_file_abs_source, SI_file_abs_target
Message mapping: MM_file_split for mapping MT_file_split_sender with MT_file_split_receiver
Interface mapping: OM_file_split
u2022 Source = SI_file_split_out
u2022 Target = SI_file_split_in
u2022 Mapping Program = MM_file_split
BPM following this link http://www.riyaz.net/blog/xipi-1n-multi-mapping-using-bpm/.
ID
Import my Integration process
2 Communication Channel for getting input file (CC_File_split_sender) and creating output file (CC_File_split)
2 Receiver determination:
u2022 Source system to BPM using interface SI_File_Abs_source
u2022 BPM to target system using interface SI_File_Abs_target
1 Interface determination:
u2022 from source system to BPM
u2022 Sender interface: SI_File_Split_Out
u2022 Receiver interface: SI_file_abs_source
1 Sender Agreement
u2022 Commu. Component: Source System
u2022 Using interface: SI_File_Abs_source
u2022 Sender Communication Channel: CC_File_Split_Sender
1 Receiver Agreement
u2022 Sender Communication Component: BPM
u2022 Receiver Communication Component: Target System
u2022 Receiver Interface: SI_File_Split_In
u2022 Receiver Communication Channel: CC_File_Split
Anyone know how to fix this?
Thanks,
Pavin

Hi,
Yes, thats the problem.
You are creating file from test tab of 1..N mapping .
In case of 1..N mappping in mapping Extra tags of messages are addded to the data.As shown here:-
Messages
 Message1
 MessageType
When you use this mapping to generate xml message then it will add additional tags for <Messages> and <Message1>, which is not correct. it should only have structure of you MT.
So remove start and end tag of <Messages> and <Message1> from your data file. Mentioned below in bold.
<xml......>
<Messages>
<Message1>
<MT_...>
</MT_...>
</Message1>
</Messages>
This should solve your problem.
Regards,
Sami.

Multi-Mapping with BPM?

Hi Experts,
Can anyone send me a scenario which contains multi-mapping using BPM (collect pattern)........I searched on SDN but cudn't find any scenario which contains Multi-Mapping BPM scenarios. All the scenarios which r available based on without BPM.............points will given to the approriate replies.
Thanks in Advance
Faisal

Hey
strange you didn't find it,it was the second link when i searched SDN with the string "multimapping BPM"
/people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
Thanx
Aamir

Multi mapping before BPM and then message routing to different IDocs

I am working on PI 7.0.
I have a scenario where a message from a third party needs to be split and then mapped to multiple IDocs in the target. This decision happens based on an RFC call to SAP ECC. Before the message passes to BPM, I have done a multi mapping to make the RFC call and split the message into multiple messages. Subsequently I have taken a multi line container inside the BPM to receive these messages and process them Parforeach and then a switch is applied to handle the rest of the scenario.
Problem is when I am trying to execute the scenario, it fails in first step(multi mapping) before the BPM, it is not able to create the node for the multiple message.
To explain a bit more, Message type say M1 is linked to Message interface MI1_OB. Then I have created an abstract message interface MI1_ABS and made it as 0---unbounded. Similarly in the message mapping I have changed the occurrence of the target message type (same as source message type)

Hi Ambrish Mishra,
Please check "Performing Several Multi-Mappings in a Series" [Link|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi711/helpdata/en/21/6faf35c2d74295a3cb97f6f3ccf43c/frameset.htm] . According it, second mapping should be able to accept this structure as input
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<sm:Messages xmlns:sm="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
<Message1>
</Message1>
<MessageN>
</MessageN>
</sm:Messages>
Regards,
Raghu_Vamsee

Multi Message Mapping without BPM: Limitaions

Hi Crew,
I have done this one(without BPM)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/3115. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
I understood that there cannot be multiple receiver services.
This message splitting can be done only with one sender and one receiver business services (with many communication channels) without BPM.
Am I right?
Are there anymore limitations than this?
Regards,
Karthik kaveriselvan.

select multiple receivers using the + button.
one sender service.
two receiver service referring to one target interface each with one communicaiton channel each.
Two interface determination for two business services and they both are refering to the same enhanced interface mapping.
Created receiver determination and added the two receiver service to it, but when looking at the configuration overview for receiver determinaiton, for each service, both the target interfaces used in interface mapping are listed and the reciever determination shows "Does not exist".
When I run the scenario, I get "No receiver agreement found" error.
Please calrify how many receiver agreements have to be configured and how?
Thanks
karthik

Exception Handling for Multi Mapping in bpm

Hello,
does anybody know a way of catching an error occured in a multi-mapping used in an integration process.
It seems to me, that when i am using a multi-mapping in an integration process and an error occurs, the message cannot get back to the integration process. In smq2 I can see, that there is the following error:
CX_MERGE_SPLIT
Regards
Günther

The transformation-step is in an block with an exception branch and it is well configured.
When I use a 1 to 1 mapping and an error in the mapping occurs, all is correct. The integration process jumps in to the exception branch and finishes correct. But when use a multi mapping (1 to n; n to 1; n to m) and an error in the mapping occurs, then there is always an error in the bpe inbound queue.
There must be some problem with the split-and-merge program. I think that the split-and-merge program handles the merging of n messages into 1. You can see this when you test a mapping in the integration builder designer. In a multi-mapping there you can see a xml-structure that envelopes the application messages, f. ex.:
<ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
 <ns0:Message1>
 <myMessage1>data</myMessage1>
 </ns0:Message1>
 <ns0:Message2>
 <myMessage2>data2</myMessage2>
 </ns0:Message2>
</ns0:Messages>

1:2 Message Mapping WithOut BPM - Split mapping created no messages Error

Hi,
I am a new-bie to SAP PI and am trying out the following scenario without BPM.
Make multiple files based on Age received from input file.Input File contains Name,DOB and Output File contains Name, Age.
I want to create 2 files, one containing details of people with Age <21 and the other output file containing details of people with Age >= 21.
To acheive this,
In IR, I created 2 DT and 3 MT,1 MM with 2 Target MT,both having occurences 0..unbounded, 1 IM with 2 Target MI,both having occurences 0..unbounded
And in ID, 1 Sender Agreement, 2 Receiver Agreement, 1 Receiver Determination, 1 Interface Determination using Enhanced Interface Determination.
When i run this scenario, I am getting the following error "Split mapping created no messages"
Please let me know how can I resolve it.

Oops, I did not know that.
Thanks for that information. uhuuuuuuuuuuu, atlast the message is processed and I am seeing output files created.
But, there is still one problem. My output files are created with just the following content
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<ns1:MT_2OP_File_Out xmlns:ns1="http://POC_Sec1_1IP2OP2" />
In MM, I see the output message as follows:
Message
 Message1
 MT_2OP_File_Out
 Employee
 Name
 Age
 Message2
 MT_2OP_File_Out1
 Employee1
 Name
 Age
The mapping done:
MT_2OP_File_Out and MT_2OP_File_Out with the Message Type element on source end.
Employee and Employee1 are mapped as
 Age -> removeContext -> SplitByValue[Each Value] < 21, Map Employee
 Age -> removeContext -> SplitByValue[Each Value] >= 21, Map Employee1 resp
The fields are straight maps.
Is there any basic mapping error that I am making. Please help.

Spliting files based on condition using multi mapping with BPM

Hi All,
Can any one please let me know How to Splite the outbound records based on condition using multi mapping with Integration Process in BPM?
Thanks
Govindu.

Hi All,
Sorry for mistake this question for Exchange infrastructure guys.
Thanks,
Govindu

Multi-map without using BPM

Hello
I am trying to create a multimap without using BPM as we are on SP15. I did the respective configuration in Message and Interface mapping as mentioned in the weblog.
I am expecting multiple files to get generated in the target directory and i hope file adapter supports this.
For that I did extended interface determination where I selected the respective interface mapping.
When I am trying to execute this interface it throws error in SXMB_MONI saying "No messages created from split mapping".
One more doubt, with what names it will generate multiple files?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Rajeev

Hello
I tested my mappings in the Test tab of Interface Mapping where it runs absolutely fine.
Here is source and target messages
***************************Source**********************************
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
- <ns0:Message1>
- <ns1:UpdateShipTest_MT xmlns:ns1="http://sjm.com/DynConf">
- <DELIVERY>
<DELIVERY_NUMBER>12</DELIVERY_NUMBER>
<TRACKING_NUMBER>3</TRACKING_NUMBER>
<SHIP_DATE>3</SHIP_DATE>
<USER_ID>33</USER_ID>
<SHIP_VIA>3</SHIP_VIA>
<ITMNO>3</ITMNO>
<MATNR>3</MATNR>
<QUANTITY>3</QUANTITY>
</DELIVERY>
- <DELIVERY>
<DELIVERY_NUMBER>121</DELIVERY_NUMBER>
<TRACKING_NUMBER>3</TRACKING_NUMBER>
<SHIP_DATE>3</SHIP_DATE>
<USER_ID>33</USER_ID>
<SHIP_VIA>3</SHIP_VIA>
<ITMNO>3</ITMNO>
<MATNR>3</MATNR>
<QUANTITY>3</QUANTITY>
</DELIVERY>
</ns1:UpdateShipTest_MT>
</ns0:Message1>
</ns0:Messages>
*************************End Source*****************************
This is the one message which is required to be split into two separate Delivery files
***************************************Target Message*******************************
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
- <ns0:Message1>
- <ns1:UpdateShipTest_MT xmlns:ns1="http://sjm.com/DynConf">
- <DELIVERY>
<DELIVERY_NUMBER>4</DELIVERY_NUMBER>
<TRACKING_NUMBER>5</TRACKING_NUMBER>
<SHIP_DATE>5</SHIP_DATE>
<USER_ID>5</USER_ID>
<SHIP_VIA>5</SHIP_VIA>
<ITMNO>5</ITMNO>
<MATNR>5</MATNR>
<QUANTITY>5</QUANTITY>
</DELIVERY>
</ns1:UpdateShipTest_MT>
- <ns1:UpdateShipTest_MT xmlns:ns1="http://sjm.com/DynConf">
- <DELIVERY>
<DELIVERY_NUMBER>46</DELIVERY_NUMBER>
<TRACKING_NUMBER>5</TRACKING_NUMBER>
<SHIP_DATE>5</SHIP_DATE>
<USER_ID>5</USER_ID>
<SHIP_VIA>5</SHIP_VIA>
<ITMNO>5</ITMNO>
<MATNR>5</MATNR>
<QUANTITY>5</QUANTITY>
</DELIVERY>
</ns1:UpdateShipTest_MT>
</ns0:Message1>
</ns0:Messages>
*************************************End Target****************************************
According to interface map I guess the adapter should split the messages but at runtime it gives error.
Thanks and Regards
Rajeev

Multi mapping - with BPM / without BPM

Hi Iam testing Multimapping with and without mapping.
in Mapping Editor
Source structure:
Messages 1..1
...Message1 1..1
......MT_Combined_file 1:1 DT_Combined_File
........DT_State 1..1
...........State_rec 0..unbounded
........DT_Supplier 1..1
..........Supplier_Rec 0..Unbounded
Target Structure:
Messages 1..1
...Message1 1..1
......MT_State 1:1 DT_State
........State 1..1
..........State_rec 0..Unbounded
...Message2 1..1
......MT_Supplier 1:1 DT_Supplier
........Supplier 1..1
...........Supplier_rec 0..Unbounded
Mapping:
DT_State -
> State
State_rec -
> State_rec
DT_Supplier -
> DT_Supplier
Supplier_rec -
> Supplier_rec
Testing XML taken from test tab and is as follows:
I copied XML from test tab as is and removed <ns0: messages > line.
 <ns0:Message1>
 <ns1:MT_Combined_File xmlns:ns1="http://bpm.split.com">
 <DT_State>
 <State_rec>NYC</State_rec>
 </DT_State>
 <DT_Supplier>
 <Supplier_rec>WalMart</Supplier_rec>
 </DT_Supplier>
 </ns1:MT_Combined_File>
 </ns0:Message1>
Could anyone help me what I'm doing wrong. I need to give sample XML to Legacy folks so that they generate XML data to be picked up by File Adapter.
Thanks for any help.

Hi,
take this part
<ns1:MT_Combined_File xmlns:ns1="http://bpm.split.com">
<DT_State>
<State_rec>NYC</State_rec>
</DT_State>
<DT_Supplier>
<Supplier_rec>WalMart</Supplier_rec>
</DT_Supplier>
</ns1:MT_Combined_File>
ignore <ns0:Message1> this will be generated at runtime.
Thanks,
Prakash

Message Split without BPM - Error

Hi,
I am creating a message split scenario without BPM as per weblog <a href="/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible Split without BPM</a>
I am able to receive message in XI but after that it shows error in Integration engine.
Error Category : MAPPING
Error Code : GENERIC
I am able to see the message in SXMB_MONI with error
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">GENERIC</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>No messages created from split mapping</SAP:P1>
Please advice.
Thanks,
Sri.

Hi Venkat,
I am not able to see sub-groupid in sxmb_moni.
Please see below the contents from sxmb_moni trace.
============================
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: sender</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender scheme external = XIParty</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender agency external = http://sap.com/xi/XI</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: receiver</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver scheme external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver agency external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_HTTP_HANDLER-HANDLE_REQUEST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/xi/engine?type=entry</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is done by XMB !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = 67F58830CE9E11DA91CD00111120E6DB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0002</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0002</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTO6___0000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Object-Id:29EB87F0231C357A8336DDEBD574EEAB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:0CF1E1E0C5FC11DABCB9E4A50A07012B</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Step:1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:JAVA</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_filesplit_without_bpm_</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
</SAP:Trace>
Thanks,
Sri.

Duplicate Message ID issue in case of Multi mapping (without BPM)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for