Duplicate messages in search results (when using Smart Mailboxes, etc)

I've recently started using Search Folders more and more in Mail.app
I've encountered this very annoying bug/feature, where duplicate messages show up in a search (inside Mail). The duplicate messages are showing up multiple times (once, for each Smart Mailbox they reside in) as well as their physical Mailbox, as well as "All Mail".
The lowdown:
Mac OS X Leopard (10.5.4 Build 9E17)
Dual 1.25 GHz PowerPC G4 -----(shut up! it still rocks w/my multiple 23'' apple displays)
2GB RAM
Mail.app Version 3.3 (926.1/926)
This feature/bug makes it VERY difficult to find things when I'm forced to sift through at least 3 copies of any message that appears in Smart Mailboxes.
Should I stop using Smart Mailboxes because this is a deliberate feature?
Any suggestions or thoughts would be GREATLY appreciated.
In a search, I think that a better way to display the multiple locations (through Smart Mailboxes, etc) that a mailbox "appears" would be to add something to the header section of a message, below everything else, or off to the right, which would indicate the Original (physical) folder a message exists in, as well as it's locations via Search Folders. This would at least eliminate the problem where they're showing up as two, three, or more COPIES within a search.
Thanks,
Jackson

Hi Christiaan !
I understand your problem. Could you set your IMAP account to avoid multiple simultaneous sessions?? maybe if there is only one session allowed per user or per time, then parallel XI threads will not be able to start downloading the messages.
If you cannot use a longer poll interval, then you could develop an adapter module for the Mail sender adapter that could be used to verify if the current mail is just being downloaded by other thread. This adapter module could check the unique mail data (date/time + subject + etc.) against a local table.
Regards,
Matias.
PD: please award points if helpful.
Message was edited by:
Matias Denker

Similar Messages

No search results when using custom list search

Hi,
I've built a custom list in SharePoint Online , which was supposed to be a new tracker. It was a combination of 3 different DBs. I combined the data in excel, scrubbed it and synced the data into my sharepoint list using Access. The question: Why
don't I have any entries showing when I use the seach box within my list? It comes up with nothing found? I don't have SharePoint Admin rights, I'm just a site owner. Which elements should I look into first to make sure that my entries are found? Any help
will be greatly appreciated. Thank You.

Hi WSBR.Darius,
After you added data into the custom list, if you want to search the items, you also need to run a crawl for your content source.
However, for SharePoint 2013 Online, continuous crawls are enabled in SharePoint Online, with crawl frequencies managed by Microsoft. You need to wait for finishing continuous crawl.
More information about Search feature in SharePoint Online:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj819291.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
In addition, as this issue is about SharePoint 2013 online, I suggest you create a new thread on Office 365 forum, more experts will assist you with SharePoint Online.
Office 365 forum:
http://community.office365.com/en-us/f/default.aspx
Best Regards,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

I'm having trouble with something that redirects Google search results when I use Firefox on my PC. It's called the 'going on earth' virus. Do you have a fix that could rectify the vulnerability in your software?

I'm having trouble with a virus or something which affects Google search results when I use Firefox on my PC ...
When I search a topic gives me pages of links as normal, but when I click on a link, the page is hijacked to a site called 'www.goingonearth.com' ...
I've done a separate search and found that other users are affected, but there doesn't seem to be a clear-cut solution ... (Norton, McAfee and Kaspersky don't seem to be able to detect/fix it).
I'd like to continue using the Firefox/Google combination (nb: the hijack virus also affects IE but not Safari) - do you have a patch/fix that could rectify the vulnerability in your software?
thanks

''' "... vulnerability in your software?" ''' 
And it affects IE, too? Ya probably picked up some malware and you blame it on Firefox.
Install, update, and run these programs in this order. They are listed in order of efficacy. '''''(Not all programs detect the same Malware, so you may need to run them all to solve your problem.)''''' These programs are all free for personal use, but some have limited functionality in the "free mode" - but those are features you really don't need to find and remove the problem that you have. 
''Note: If your Malware infection is bad enough and you are mis-directed to URL's other than what is posted, you may have to use a different PC to download these programs and use a USB stick to transfer them to the afflicted PC.''
Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware - [http://www.malwarebytes.org/mbam.php] 
SuperAntispyware - [http://www.superantispyware.com/] 
AdAware - [http://www.lavasoftusa.com/software/adaware/] 
Spybot Search & Destroy - [http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html] 
Windows Defender: Home Page - [http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/defender/default.mspx] 
Also, if you have a search engine re-direct problem, see this: 
http://deletemalware.blogspot.com/2010/02/remove-google-redirect-virus.html
If these don't find it or can't clear it, post in one of these forums for specialized malware removal help: 
[http://www.spywarewarrior.com/index.php] 
[http://forum.aumha.org/] 
[http://www.spywareinfoforum.com/] 
[http://bleepingcomputer.com]

Using smart previews on iMac to control two sets of identical original files on two external drives --- render previews setting when using smart previews

I’m just getting started with Lightroom and if someone can help me I’ll be very appreciative.
I’m using an iMac with a 1TB drive and two external 2.5 TB drives for backup. My active files are on all three drives and I’m running out of room on the iMac drive.
With the smart previews capability of Lightroom 5, I’m hoping to remove all the active files from the iMac drive. I hope to import existing images into the LR catalog from two identical drives with identical folders and have both sets of images reflect the changes I make using smart previews on my iMac.
I just created two identical test folders of junk images on the external drives and was following a beginners tutorial on importing. However, I see nothing about using smart previews on my iMac that, when connected, will update more than one external drive at the same time.
I’m also wondering if, when using smart previews, it matters how I set the render previews during the import process.
Many thanks for any help,
Karl Hentz

I don't see any way to use smart previews to update both external drives at the same time. The smart previews are linked to a specific set of images. But it seems to me that if both drives are in fact identical, once the catalog is updated when one of those drives is connected those changes should also apply to the files on the other drive. It's actually the catalog that gets updated, not the images. Smart previews and regular import previews are completely unrelated. How you have your import previews configured will have no effect on your smart previews.
Incidentally, in order for my suggestion to work it would be necessary to only have one of those external drives connected. And when the other EHD is connected it would have to have the same drive letter or name. In other words it would have to appear to the iMac that it is precisely the same drive.

Performance issues when using Smart View and Excel 2010

Hello, we are experiencing very slow retrieval times when using Smart View and Excel 2010. Currently on v.11.1.3.00 and moved over from Excel 2003 in the last quarter. The same spreadsheets in 2010 (recreated) are running much slower than they used to in 2003 and I was wondering if anyone else out there has experienced similar problems?
It looks like there is some background caching going on as when you copy and paste the contents into a new file and retrieve it is better.....initially. The size of the files are generally less than 2mb and there aren't an expecially large number of subcubes requested so I am at a loss to explain or alleviate the issues.
Any advice / tips on how to optimise the performance would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Nick

Hi Nick,
Office 2010 (32 bit) only is supported.
Also check these documents:
Refresh in Smart View 11.1.2.1 is Slow with MS Office 2010. (Doc ID 1362557.1)
Smart View Refresh Returns Zeros (Doc ID 758892.1)
Internet Explorer (IE7, IE8 and IE9) Recommended Settings for Oracle Hyperion Products (Doc ID 820892.1)
Thank you,
Charles Babu J
Edited by: CJX on Nov 15, 2011 12:21 PM

Incorrect Results When Using an In-Line View and User Function in 10g

My developers are complaining of incorrect Select statement results when using an in-line view along with a user defined function. Below is the statement:
select test_f(wo1)
from
(SELECT a.WORK_ORDER_NBR, b.work_order_nbr wo1/*, facility_f(A.FACILITY),
A.PLANNER, A.WO_STATUS, mil_date(A.WO_STATUS_DATE)*, A.WORK_ORDER_TYPE,
A.WO_DESCRIPTION
FROM TIDWOWRK A, TIDWOTSK B
WHERE B.WORK_ORDER_NBR(+) = A.WORK_ORDER_NBR))
where wo1 is null;
Test_f() is a user defined function and the above query returns thousands of rows. It should return 308 rows. It is apparent that the target database is not evaluating the "where wo1 is null;" clause.
select to_char(wo1)
from
(SELECT a.WORK_ORDER_NBR, b.work_order_nbr wo1/*, facility_f(A.FACILITY),
A.PLANNER, A.WO_STATUS, mil_date(A.WO_STATUS_DATE)*, A.WORK_ORDER_TYPE,
A.WO_DESCRIPTION
FROM TIDWOWRK A, TIDWOTSK B
WHERE B.WORK_ORDER_NBR(+) = A.WORK_ORDER_NBR))
where wo1 is null;
In the above query return 308 rows. The user function was replaced by an Oracle function. The Where clause is now evaluated correctly.
The query is executed from an Oracle 10g R2 database and retrieves data from a 9.2.0.6 database.
I've seen a little information on Metalink. It appears that there was some trouble in 9i, but were fixed in a 9.2.0.6 patch. I don't see any information about a 10.2.0.2 database.
Anyone have any experiences or a successful solution. I suspect that I will need to report this to Oracle and wait for a patch.
Thanks,
John

I can only think of two reasons for this behaviour:
1) You are executing these two queries from two different users and there is some policy on the table.
2) The function doesn't do an upper, but returns null a lot of times, even when the input is a not null value, like this:
SQL> create table tidwowrk
2 as
3 select 1 id, 'A' work_order_nbr, 'DST' facility from dual union all
4 select 2, null, 'TRN' from dual union all
5 select 3, 'C', 'DST' from dual
6 /
Tabel is aangemaakt.
SQL> create table tidwotsk
2 as
3 select 'A' work_order_nbr from dual union all
4 select 'B' from dual
5 /
Tabel is aangemaakt.
SQL> create or replace function test_f (a in varchar2) return varchar2
2 is
3 begin
4    return case a when 'A' then null else a end;
5 end;
6 /
Functie is aangemaakt.
SQL> select count(*)
2    from ( SELECT a.WORK_ORDER_NBR
3                , test_f(b.work_order_nbr) wo1
4             FROM TIDWOWRK A
5                , TIDWOTSK B
6            WHERE B.WORK_ORDER_NBR(+) = A.WORK_ORDER_NBR
7              and a.facility in ('DST', 'TRN', 'SUB')
8         )
9   where wo1 is null
10 /
                              COUNT(*)
                                     3
1 rij is geselecteerd.
SQL> select count(*)
2    from ( SELECT a.WORK_ORDER_NBR
3                , to_char(b.work_order_nbr) wo1
4             FROM TIDWOWRK A, TIDWOTSK B
5            WHERE B.WORK_ORDER_NBR(+) = A.WORK_ORDER_NBR
6              and a.facility in ('DST', 'TRN', 'SUB')
7         )
8   where wo1 is null
9 /
                              COUNT(*)
                                     2
1 rij is geselecteerd.Regards,
Rob.

Is it possible to have multiple search results page using one Search Enterprise Center site?

Hi,
We're using SharePoint 2013 and I'm trying to modify the search results page for one site collection. By default, it uses the search results page from the parent site which is the search center being used by default for the web application. I need to make
sure that the site collection will only retrieve search results within the site collection (search everything has to be disabled). I found a way but I had to create another search center site to accomplish this, otherwise, it will affect the search center
site of all other site collections on the web app.
Now is it possible to have multiple search results page using one Search Enterprise Center site?

Hi,
According to your description, you want to retrieve the search results within the site collection.
As a workaround, you can create a custom result source for the site collection and you will retrieve the search result within the site collection.
More information about how to create result source in SharePoint 2013, please refer to :
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj683115(v=office.15).aspx
http://techmikael.blogspot.com/2013/04/limiting-search-results-in-sharepoint.html
Best regards

Do IMAQ Cast Image or IMAQ Linear averages give different results when using different computers that are running under Windows XP ?

Hello
I'm currently developping an image processing algorithm using Labview 7.1 and the associated IMAQ Vision tools. After several tests, I found a weird result. Indeed, I put the labview algorithm - including the IMAQ VI on the library to get sure that I use all the time the same VI - on my memory stick and used it on two different computers. I tested the same picture (still in my memory stick) and had two very different results.
After several hours trying to understand why, I found that there were a difference between the results given by both computers at the very begining of the algorithm. Indeed, I used a JPEG file.
To open it, I first create an Image with IMAQ Create (U8). Then, I open it.
Then in my first sub-VI, I use IMAQ Cast Image to be sure that the picture is a U8 grayscale picture.
Right after that, I use the IMAQ Linear Averages. The results of this VI are different on the two computers.
I tried several time on the same picture : one computer always give me the same result but the two computers give me a different result. So there is no random variable on the results.
So my question is : Do IMAQ Cast Image or IMAQ Linear averages give different results when using different computers that are running under Windows XP ?
My bet is on IMAQ Cast Image but I'm not quite sure and I do not undestand why. The labview and IMAQ are the same on both computers.
The difference between the two computer are above :
Computer 1 :
Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz with a RAM of 1Go. The processor is an Intel(R).
The OS is windows XP Pro 2002
Computer 2 :
Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz with a RAM of 512Mo. The processor is an Intel(R).
The OS is windows XP Pro 2002.
If anybody can help me on this problem, it would be really helpful.
Regards
Florence P.

Hi,
Indeed it's a strange behaviour, could you send me your VI and your JPEG file, (or another file that reproduces) so that I could check this inthere ?
I'll then try to find out what's happening.
Regards
Richard Keromen
National Instruments France
#adMrkt{text-align: center;font-size:11px; font-weight: bold;} #adMrkt a {text-decoration: none;} #adMrkt a:hover{font-size: 9px;} #adMrkt a span{display: none;} #adMrkt a:hover span{display: block;}
>> Découvrez, en vidéo, les innovations technologiques réalisées en éco-conception

Safari is having problem loading messages in gmail. When using other browsers, there is no problem loading and viewing the messages. What is going on? please help!

safari is having problem loading messages in gmail. When using other browsers, there is no problem loading and viewing the messages. What is going on? please help!

I should have explained further. The game opens in a new window over to the upper left of my screen, leaving the original page underneath. I tried minimizing it so that I could get to my toolbar and did the View > Zoom > Reset. This has no effect. The lower portion of the game is still not showing. Using other browsers the window or frame of the game is much larger, therefore everything shows.

Signed messages are missing from search results in a shared mailbox

We recently completed moving all user mailboxes to Exchange 2013 from Exchange 2010. We also have a policy that disables the 'download shared mailboxes' option in Outlook as it cause .ost files to get cumbersome and cause performance problems. This
means that shared mailboxes that users have open are all in 'Online' mode. Since the move to 2013, when users search against a folder in a shared mailbox, the only items that are returned are unsigned messages. Our customer base very frequently
signs email and these signed messages do not show up in results. This was working in Exchange 2010 so our users are frustrated by the sudden inability to receive complete and accurate search results.
If they perform a search of their local mailbox, which is using Cached mode, they are searching against their local index and they can find signed messages. But since the shared mailbox is not cached to their local system, they are relying on the Exchange
server index and it does not seem to be indexing any signed messages.
Does anyone know how to force Exchange 2013 to index signed messages?

try to perform the below steps and check if it works or else we need to wait till Exchange 2013 SP1 which they have planned to bring digital signature message in exchange
Outlook 2007
In Outlook 2007, follow these steps to verify that indexing is complete:
In Outlook, click Tools, Instant Search, and then click
Instant Search.
When the Microsoft Office Outlook dialog appears, you should see the following:
Outlook has finished indexing all of your items.
New items are indexed when they arrive.
0 items remaining in "Mailbox -<<var>username</var>>"
0 items remaining across all open mailboxes.
Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013
In Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013, follow these steps to verify that indexing is complete:
In Outlook, click in the Search box.
Click the Search tab, click Search Tools, and then click
Indexing Status.
When the Indexing Status dialog appears, you should see the following:
Outlook has finished indexing all of your items.
0 items remaining to be indexed.
Exchange Queries

How to reveal/open mailbox containing selected message in search results?

A user is trying to find a message. She searches for the sender's email address and she sees the message in the search results and it is listed as being in a mailbox named "Prism". She browses through her list of mailboxes (local and on the server) and see no such mailbox. She opens Get Info and sees that mailbox is listed as containing 53 messages, yet selecting it and clicking on the Show Messages buttons generates an empty window and the error "No Mailbox Selected".
I had her rebuild her In mailbox on the chance that the missing folder was a child of the In box (I've seen her do that before). I have on more than one occasion watched someone delete mailboxes that are the child of the In box and when they deleted the second-to-last one the last mailbox also disappears. In those cases the disappearing mailbox has always been empty so it wasn't a big issue. I'm wondering if this is how the "Prism" mailbox disappeared.
I seem to recall that there is a keyboard shortcut that would open the parent mailbox of a selected email in a search results listing but I can't seem to find that shortcut. Anyone know if there is such a thing? And anyone have any other ideas how to find the missing mailbox?

Michael,
if the search was done from within Mail, looking into "all folders" and you see the message, open that message in the Find results window and top right you will see a link to open the email in its original mailbox.
Now if you do that, the left column should show where the mailbox is.

Stop Firefox from reverting back to Google Search Results when opening a page from results list

When I click on one of the results from a Google search, I have it open the page in a new window. The page opens in the new window just fine, but instead of letting me view the page in the new window, Firefox takes me back to the Google Search results page. I am able to click on the new window and view the page that I chose, but it gets old being sent back to the search results each time I click on one of them and attempt to view it.
This happens on my work PC, home laptop, and my desktop at home as well. I have different versions running on each machine, and home laptop has the latest version of Firefox. I have searched the web and cannot find anyone having this same problem, much less a resolution, so I will ask here.
I hope this makes sense, if more info is needed please let me know.
Thanks to anyone that can help.

One reason for this can be if the new window contains Flash media, but Flash hasn't been used for several minutes, the Adobe protected mode feature changes the order of the windows. This is a bug that Adobe has yet to fix. This thread describes the problem in more details and lists the known workarounds: [https://support.mozilla.org/questions/955659 Opening New Windows and Shockwave Flash].
If you rule out the Flash issue, could you test the page in Firefox's Safe Mode? That's a standard diagnostic tool to deactivate extensions and some advanced features of Firefox. More info: [[Troubleshoot Firefox issues using Safe Mode]].
You can restart Firefox in Safe Mode using either:
* "3-bar" menu button > "?" button > Restart with Add-ons Disabled
* Help menu > Restart with Add-ons Disabled
Not all add-ons are disabled: Flash and other plugins still run
After Firefox shuts down, a small dialog should appear. Click "Start in Safe Mode" (''not'' Reset).
Any difference?

Messages in search results won't open and can't be found

I run a local search in the search box on the top right of the email screen. Three messages are found. I click on any of the three messages, and the message list screen appears, but the message is not listed.
Is there any way to determine where these three messages are stored? They apparently still exist somewhere, but I can't find them.
I can search for other keywords, and the search function works just fine. Somehow, these three messages are being stored somewhere obscure.
Thanks for any guidance you can provide.
Additional Information: The left side bar of the search results indicates that the messages are in a folder I created within Local Folders, but that folder just isn't there.

There's good news and bad news. With your guidance, I was able to rebuild the Global Database. It took just a few minutes to re-index. Unfortunately, those three messages are gone completely now -- no shadow of them remaining when I rerun the search. I suspect that, while the messages were seemingly invisible, the folder they were in got deleted under the assumption that the folder was now empty. Oops. Oh well. Whatchagonna do! It makes me wonder, though, what other emails might be gone now that I'm not even aware of.
It sounds like rebuilding the Global Database might be a regular maintenance item for me moving forward.
Thanks so much for your help! I really do appreciate it.

Still have to unlock ipad when using smart cover iOS7

Before the update I would just open my ipad cover and it would be unlocked. Now, randomly, my iPad will still be locked when I open it but the screen is lit up. I think its happening when I have a notification sitting there. (i.e. "_______ Has mentioned you on Facebook" or a text message) I've checked the setting where its supposed to unlock when opened. Is this just some new feature?

Hi,
I too have this issue.
Here is the workaround, but is tedious and depends on how many notification apps you have.
Go Settings -> Notification Center -> Under INCLUDE ->
For each app, disable "Show on Lock Screen"
This will allow you to unlock using smart cover without swipe to unlock.
Downside would be you get no alert sound when new notification comes in. Unless its unlocked. Hope they resolve this issue asap.

OA Query Region shows previous search results when moving between pages

Hello All,
I have a custom OA Page which has a query region based on a LOV for searching device names. The problem I am facing is once device name is searched and I go to another page through the quick links and come back to same Search Device page, it shows the previous searched results. I am not retaining AM for any page navigation.
Things I have already tried :
1 . I have tried refreshing VO by using clearcache and reset methods on VO.
2. Get the Go button from the query region in ProcessFormRequest and on Go button click I use forwardImmediatelyToCurrentPage. And in Process Request method I am querying the results manually when Go button is clicked. Otherwise I am manually making the where clause condition 1=2 and ensuring that the VO does not return any rows.
But still I am not able to get rid of the issue.
The code used is pasted below for your reference. It is urgent. Can you please provide any pointers.
public void processRequest(OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
super.processRequest(pageContext, webBean);
try
VpaAdminAMImpl am = (VpaAdminAMImpl)pageContext.getApplicationModule(webBean);
TkvpaDeviceSearchVOImpl deviceAll = am.getTkvpaDeviceSearchVO1();
deviceAll.clearCache();
deviceAll.reset();
deviceAll.setWhereClause("1=2");
deviceAll.setWhereClauseParams(null);
String query = deviceAll.getQuery();
System.out.println("getSearchResult query :="+query);
deviceAll.executeQuery();
OAQueryBean queryBean = (OAQueryBean)webBean.findChildRecursive("region1");
String goAction = queryBean.getGoButtonName();
if(pageContext.getParameter(goAction) != null)
getSearchResult(am, pageContext, webBean);
catch(Exception ex)
throwException("SearchDeviceCO.processRequest",ex);
public void processFormRequest(OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
super.processFormRequest(pageContext, webBean);
String action = pageContext.getParameter(EVENT_PARAM);
OAQueryBean queryBean = (OAQueryBean)webBean.findChildRecursive("region1");
String Go = queryBean.getGoButtonName();
System.out.println(pageContext.getParameter(Go));
if(pageContext.getParameter(Go) != null)
pageContext.forwardImmediatelyToCurrentPage(null,false,"N");
public void getSearchResult(VpaAdminAMImpl am, OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
try
String device = pageContext.getParameter("deviceSearch");
StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
if(device != null && device != "")
sb.append(" DEVICE_NAME = '");
sb.append(device);
sb.append("'");
String sql = sb.toString();
TkvpaDeviceSearchVOImpl deviceAll = am.getTkvpaDeviceSearchVO1();
deviceAll.setWhereClause(sql);
deviceAll.setWhereClauseParams(null);
String query = deviceAll.getQuery();
System.out.println("getSearchResult query :="+query);
deviceAll.executeQuery();
}catch(Exception e)
e.printStackTrace();
Thanks in Advance,
Abhishek Mishra

Hi Anand,
The getSearchResult method also does the same thing. I have also tried to remove the dependency on getSearchResult and wrote the same code in ProcessRequest() but still it does not solve the problem.
In fact, I have ensured that the VO does not contain any records and have checked these by using SOPs and debug in JDEV. The interesting point is the VO does not have any records but still the previous search data and search criteria is shown when we navigate to the page. Printed the query just before performing execute query and that query does not return any records. Also tried printing something if there are any records in the VO by using vo.hasNext().
Data gets stored somewhere and it is shown when the page is navigated from other page. FYI, this page is accessed from quick links and there are other pages also in the quick links and when we navigate between these pages we get to see the previous search results. Tried methods clearCache(), reset() on VOs but still unsuccessful.
Not even that I thought that the VO may be corrupted in some sense so I created a new VO instance in the AM and then used newly created VO instance in the query region. But still no luck.
Any pointers will be appreciated.
Thanks in Advance,
Abhishek

Duplicate messages in search results (when using Smart Mailboxes, etc)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for