During invoice verification- error "Invoice Quantity exceeds GR quantity".
Dear friends,
Myclientisfacing a problem during invoice verification(invoice quantity exceeds GR quantity).
user created PO withtwo line items. in first line item he used account assignment K (cost center) for cable purchase. and inthe second line item he used account assignment category -K and item category -D for cableinstallation charges. foe firat line item he created GR(migo) and for the secondlineitem being service he did service entry sheet(ML81N). while doing invoice verification they got the error "Invoice Quantity exceeds GR quantity". so we tried to post the first lineitemand it was successfully posted.while doing invoice verification for second line item it is throwing "Invoice Quantity exceeds GR quantity".
please help me in this to solve the issue.
Thanksin advance.
Regards,
william
Hi,
Please check that if your second line item which happened to be service line item as you have mentioned have the service base invoice verification checked in the invoice tab of second line item (line item detail level). If so the you need to post your service entry sheet after releasing it. System will generate a 101 movement material document in the back ground.
Hope it helps.
BR
Similar Messages
-
Any configuration can control PO quantity exceed PR quantity?
Hello all,
Any configuration can control PO quantity exceed PR quantity? thanks.hi,
Set the Following Messages as errors:
06 076 : Materials of requisition & item & alr. ordered in full
06 099 : Materials for all purchase requisitions already ordered in full
Hope it helps..
Regards
Priyanka.P -
Pick List Creation Released quantity exceeds open quantity
Hi all,
I'm getting the following error when trying to create pick lists through the SAPB1 DI:
"Released quantity exceeds open quantity "
Every time, the stock quantity in the warehouse that the code concerns is by far enough when compared to the released quantity.
I cannot turn off the warehouse setting recommended on another post on here.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Cal.Hi, sorry for my delayed response!
This is still an issue, I already have a condition to check against the warehouse's current stock, this is being successful but still generates the above error when we get to PLIST.add()
Here's the SQL I'm using to gather my data:
select distinct t3.docnum,t4.listName as'Price List',(select isnull(sum(1),0) from pkl1 S99 where S99.orderentry = T0.docentry
and S99.orderline = T0.linenum) as 'cupid',t0.DocEntry, t3.Confirmed, DATEDIFF(DAY,GETDATE(),t3.DocDueDate)
as 'DateDifference' from rdr1 t0 inner join oitm t2 on t0.ItemCode = t2.ItemCode inner join ORDR t3
on t3.DocEntry = t0.DocEntry inner join OCRD t1 on t3.CardCode = t1.cardcode inner join OPLN t4
on t1.listnum = t4.listNum where T0.[WhsCode] = 'xxx' and T2.[OnHand] > 0 and T0.[OpenQty] > 0 and T2.InvntItem = 'y'
and t3.Confirmed = 'y' and (select isnull(sum(1),0) from pkl1 S99 where S99.orderentry = T0.docentry and S99.orderline = T0.linenum) = 0
and t4.ListName <> 'EconoSupplies Sales' and t4.ListName <> 'EconoSupplies Sales (EUR)'
and DATEDIFF(DAY,GETDATE(),t3.DocDueDate) < case when datepart(WEEKDAY,getdate()) = 6 then 4 else 2 end group by t3.docnum,t0.docEntry,
t3.Confirmed , t0.LineNum, t4.listname, DATEDIFF(DAY,GETDATE(),t3.DocDueDate) order by t0.DocEntry
This returns a list of all the picks that I am interested in. I have changed the warehouse code for privacy.
Next, we loop through each pick and extract the data:
SELECT T1.[DocNum], T1.[DocEntry],T0.[LineNum], T1.[CardCode],T0.[ItemCode], T0.[Dscription], T0.[OpenQty], (SELECT sum(s99
.[OpenQty]) FROM RDR1 s99 WHERE s99.[DocEntry] = T0.[DocEntry] and s99.[ItemCode] = T0.[ItemCode]) as 'TotalQty',T3.
[OnHand] FROM RDR1 T0 INNER JOIN ORDR T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry INNER JOIN OITM T2 ON T0.ItemCode = T2.ItemCode INNER
JOIN OITW T3 ON T0.ItemCode = T3.ItemCode and T0.WhsCode = T3.WhsCode WHERE T0.[WhsCode] = 'DSV' and T3.[OnHand] > 0 and
T0.[OpenQty] > 0 and T2.InvntItem = 'y' and t0.docEntry = <<<VB VARIABLE HERE>>>
ORDER BY T1.[DocEntry], T0.[LineNum]
These two sql commands are stored in a table and called from the VB code, for soft code re-usability.
The SQL returns the results I am expecting, and I don't think the problem lies here.
Here's the VB code:
Dim PLIST As SAPbobsCOM.PickLists
PLIST = GetDIConnection.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oPickLists)
Dim RS, RS1, RS2, RS12 As SAPbobsCOM.Recordset
Dim i, ii As Integer
RS = GetDIConnection.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.BoRecordset)
RS1 = GetDIConnection.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.BoRecordset)
RS12 = GetDIConnection.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.BoRecordset)
Dim WhsCode As String = GetCompanyNamedConfigValue("xxxxx", "xx")
Dim SQLText As String
Dim nErr, errMsg As String
Dim DocDate As Date = Now
Dim tempI As Integer = 1
Dim executeBody As Boolean = True
Dim ExecuteHead As Boolean = True
Dim picklistcheck, picklistcheck1 As String
Dim Type As String
'CJB---- AUTO GENERATE PICK LIST-------------------------------------
Dim OCHAPPCFGValue As String = GetAPPCFGEntry("GeneratePicks")
If OCHAPPCFGValue = "Y" The
Dim DocEntry, qty, docnum As Integer 'SO docentry & line qty
Dim ItemCode As String ' Itemcode for SO line
Dim price As Double
Dim LineNum As Integer
Dim OrderRs, ORderRs1 As SAPbobsCOM.Recordset
Dim HashTable As New Hashtable
Dim HashArray(2) As String
OrderRs = GetDIConnection.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.BoRecordset)
ORderRs1 = GetDIConnection.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.BoRecordset)
Dim sqlstring1 As String = GetAPPCFGEntry("SQLSTRING1SOWMS03")
Echo("Debug, sqlstring1: " & sqlstring1)
OrderRs.DoQuery(sqlstring1) ' just assume the SQL brings back what I need
Dim Attemptcount As Integer = 1
'We now have the docEntries we need, so we loop through each docEntry and extract the lines
Do Until OrderRs.EoF
DocEntry = OrderRs.Fields.Item("DocEntry").Value
EchoBanner("NEW RECORD, attempt count: " & Attemptcount)
Echo("DocEntry: " & DocEntry)
Dim sqlstringPart1, SqlStringPart2 As String
sqlstringPart1 = GetAPPCFGEntry("SQLSTRINGSOWMS03P1")
SqlStringPart2 = GetAPPCFGEntry("SQLSTRINGSOWMS03P2")
Dim sqlstring As String = sqlstringPart1 & " '" & DocEntry & "' " & SqlStringPart2
Echo("Debug: SOFT CODED SQL STRING FROM OCHAPPCFG FOR PICK LIST SELECTION CRITERIA:")
Echo(sqlstring)
ORderRs1.DoQuery(sqlstring)
If ORderRs1.RecordCount = 0 Then
'Error!
EchoBanner("No records found under docEntry: " & DocEntry)
End If
PLIST.PickDate = Today
PLIST.Name = "DSV Interface"
PLIST.OwnerCode = 1
Dim icount As Integer = 0
Dim onHand, TotalQty As Integer
Dim LineAdded As Boolean = False
Do Until ORderRs1.EoF
docnum = ORderRs1.Fields.Item("DocNum").Value
'PLIST.Lines.SetCurrentLine(icount)
ItemCode = ORderRs1.Fields.Item("ItemCode").Value
' price = OrderRs1.Fields.Item("Price").Value
onHand = CInt(ORderRs1.Fields.Item("onHand").Value)
TotalQty = CInt(ORderRs1.Fields.Item("TotalQty").Value)
Echo("DocNum: " & docnum)
Echo("Debug: Onhand: " & onHand)
Echo("Debug: TotalQty: " & TotalQty)
If TotalQty > onHand Then
'WE CANNOT RAISE THIS PICK LIST, MORE REQUESTED THAN IN STOCK!
Echo("Unable to generate Pick List, not enough stock for item: " & ItemCode)
Exit Do
End If
PLIST.Lines.SetCurrentLine(icount)
Echo("Line set to " & icount)
PLIST.Lines.BaseObjectType = SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oOrders
PLIST.Lines.OrderEntry = DocEntry
'CJB
LineNum = ORderRs1.Fields.Item("LineNum").Value
PLIST.Lines.OrderRowID = LineNum
'PLIST.Lines.ReleasedQuantity = OrderRs1.RecordCount ' quantity from the line in SO - OpenLineQty
PLIST.Lines.ReleasedQuantity = ORderRs1.Fields.Item("OpenQty").Value
' PLIST.Lines.TaxCode = OrderRs1.Fields.Item("VatGroup").Value
Echo("Record count : " & ORderRs1.RecordCount)
Echo("Icount: " & icount)
Echo("Details...")
Echo("Debug: LineNum: " & LineNum)
Echo("Debug: DocNum: " & docnum)
Echo("Debug: ItemCode: " & ItemCode)
Echo("Debug: Released Quantity: " & PLIST.Lines.ReleasedQuantity)
Echo("Debug: Picked Quantity: " & PLIST.Lines.PickedQuantity)
Echo("Debug: OnHand: " & onHand)
Echo("Debug: PickDate: " & PLIST.PickDate)
PLIST.Lines.Add()
Echo("Pick List line added!")
icount += 1
ORderRs1.MoveNext()
LineAdded = True
Loop
' OrderRs.DoQuery("select t0.absentry, t0.pickentry, t0.orderEntry, t1.DocEntry, t0.PickQtty from pkl1 t0 inner join ordr t1 on t0.OrderEntry = t1.DocEntry where t1.DocEntry = '" & DocEntry & "'"
' If OrderRs.RecordCount = 0 Then
If LineAdded = True Then
Echo("Adding Pick List...")
Dim lretcode As Integer = PLIST.Add()
If lretcode = 0 Then
'success!
EchoBanner("Success")
Dim LastPickEntry As String = GetDIConnection.GetNewObjectKey()
Echo("Enitre Pick List created! See Pick & Pack -> Pick List in SAPB1")
Echo("Pick Entry: " & LastPickEntry)
Else
EchoBanner("ERROR! UNABLE TO GENERATE PICKLIST!! " & GetDIConnection.GetLastErrorDescription)
End If
Else
Echo("NO LINES FOUND TO ADD TO THE PICK LIST!")
' Err.Raise(vbObjectError, "SOWMS03, generate picklist", "Error creating PickList! Error Description: " & GetDIConnection.GetLastErrorDescription & " Error Code: " & GetDIConnection.GetLastErrorCode)
'need a way of logging this error without jumping out of the loop.
End If
OrderRs.MoveNext()
Attemptcount += 1
Loop -
Reservation: withdrawn quantity exceeded requirement quantity
Hi Gurus.
Please help.
Is there a way to check why withdrawn quantity exceeded requirement quantity in reservation? System should get standard message M7362 when this happens. Settings in OMCQ are correct.
Thanks in advance...Hi,
The message might relevant for the scenario of GI to reservation, which issued quantity greater then reserved quantity in reservation.
You may check your reservation with MB25 for listing your reservation document and I suggest to use MB26 for collective and more accurate GI processing of relevant reservations.
Cheers,
Girang -
Invoice Verification Error - Enter Spread USD/EUR type M for 31.01.08
Hi,
While doing the Invoice Verification we have encountered an error message requiring the entering of Spread USD/EUR. The PO was raised in the Euro and the Invoice Verification is being done in USD. Local currency is AUD. Even though the Exchange Rates have been maintained for the Indirect/Direct quotes as of 01.01.2008, the system is indicating the aforesaid error message and not allowing the Invoice Verification to proceed with.. Could you please advise as to why this is happening and how can this be resolved ?
Thanks in advance.Hi,
This is basically a inverse calculation. Use transaction OB07 and select Inv for exchange rate type M to enable the inverse calculation.
If this goes successfull in other client then check if above setting is enabled in OB07 for exchange rate type M or there must be rate entered into it.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi -
GR Based Invoice Verification and Invoice Post and Block Process
Hi,
We currently use invoice "Post and Block" process for AP invoice processing. GR Based Invoice Verification is not set in the vendor master for this purpose to allow us to enter an invoice where "No Goods Receipt" has been raised. However, when we raise a PO using material groups the flag "GR Based Invoice Verification" is activated in the PO. We subsquently have to remove this indicator in the PO in order to register the invoice. Why is this setting populated in the PO when it is not activated in the vendor master ? Is there a setting in MM for material groups that ius populating this value in the PO where a PO is raised using material groups ?
ThanksHello Eilish,
With regards to Goods reciept indicator, firstly the system looks
for any reference documents like purchase order or contract and takes
the flag from there.
If no reference documents or contracts are referenced, then
the system looks for an info.record to take the flag from there.
If there is not a info record then system will carry out the
GR-BasedIV indicator from the vendor master.
Hope this helps,
Ray -
Logistics Invoice Verification - Error in MIRO Transaction
While posting the invoice in MIRO we get an error - " Maximum permitted number of internal tax items reached". What is the solution?
Split Document into Two Documents.
The maximum number of items for an FI document ('999') has been exceeded.
System response
FI documents have a 3-digit item counter that limits the number of items permitted per document.
Procedure
If the documents with an excessive number of items come from another application area
(e.g. sales, logistics, order accounting), you can configure the system to the effect that
these documents are summarized in FI. "
How could this error be solved as none of your invoices are getting accounted in FI?
To overcome this, the only way was to break the accounting invoices, 1 with 950 items and the other with the rest. -
Asset purchasing order invoice verification error
Hi expert. I meet a problem about asset purchasing order invoice verfication. the detail as below:
1. creat the purchasing order, the account assign category is 'A'. passed
2. goods receipt.passed, the material document created.
3. infoice verification. when simulate the finance document, the debit is the vendor (no problem), but the credit is empty (it should be the asset number which selected in PO). the document error.
what can I do to solve the problem, thanks!HI, thanks for your reply.
reference PO have been typed and balance is zero. when simulate the document, there is only the debit (vendor), no credit (asset).
this function is good yesterday. I don't know who change the configuration today, I think it must be some config change lead to this problem. -
Logistics invoice verification amount being linked to inspected quantity
Hi,
When doing LIV, the procedure for stock purchase in my company is : PO -> GR -> LIV
Normally, LIV amount is checked against the GR quantity. It happened in the past on several occasions that the goods received did not pass QI but payment was already made.
To safeguard unnecessary AP payment, our end users asked if the LIV amount can be checked against QI quantity instead of GR quantity.
Is there a SAP solution for this scenario?
Cheers
SamHi Sam
Please keep qm procuremnt active check in material master quality view. also maintain QM control key 0007 (Invoice block). Then unlesss quality is approved, IR can not be posted.
Please check and let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks
Srinivas -
Freight during Invoice verification
Hi,
We are receiving goods for different PO's and different making one delivery note. Like that freight contains of different delivery notes. So during invoie verification, how this total freight amount will be distributed among the different line items. Because during PO, I am planning with Rs.1. and during invoice verification, I a m putting actual values. So please explain, where I can put actual values, so that this freight amount will be ditributed among items...
Regards,
SridharHello Prasanna,
These are my inputs to your query(From what i understand) :
1)First of all there is a setting in the SPRO path Materials Management > Logistics Invoice Verification > Incoming Invoice > Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
2)In this particular node, you can select the "Unplanned del.costs" status to your co.code as BLANK...which means
"Distribute among invoice items".
Hope this can suffice your business requirement.
Regards
Mahesh -
Align MM and FI Document Numbers in Logistics Invoice Verification
Hi All,
Need help!
Requirement : Align MM and FI Document Numbers in Logistics Invoice Verification
Followed all the steps as per the SAP documentation : Materials Management > Logistics Invoice Verification > Incoming Invoice > Number Assignment > Maintain Number Assignments for Accounting Documents
As per the SAP documentation the configuration done should be enough to pass on MM Document No to FI document. But its not working as expected.
I have done the following:
1. Assigned MM and FI documents the same number range and both are in sync.
2. MM Documents are configured to be internally generated,
3. FI Documents are configured to be externally generated.
While during MIRO system generates errror and tells "Accouting Doc number are externally configured" (Not remembe the exact error) ? What is the solution for this issue. I need to align the MM and FI Document Numbers in Logistics Invoice Verification.
Gone through articles on internet and all discuss the same steps and configuration.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BPX/HowtoAlignMMandFIDocumentNumbersinLogisticsInvoice+Verification
Kindly provide inputs as to what could be the missing configuration or probable solution.
Thanks!
Dev
Edited by: dev ahuja on Aug 19, 2010 3:03 PMHi,
Following step should be missing in your system:-
*Step 4. Update MM number range assignment. The last step is to assign the MM number range to your MM transaction via IMG menu path Materials Management>Logistics Invoice Verification>Incoming Invoice>Number Assignment>Maintain Number Assignments for Logistic Documents>Transaction - Assign Number ranges. Two transactions are available. LIV contains the following two internal transactions that are used for the MM document number determination:
u2022RD: manual invoice entry (MIRO)
u2022RS: cancel, reverse invoice (MR8M), evaluated receipt settlement (MRRL), EDI invoice receipt, invoicing plan (MRIS), and revaluation (MRNB).
You need to update the number range interval for transaction RD.*
Please check.
Regards,
Gaurav -
Hello all,
I got some requirement from my client as below:
1) As of now, the invoicing party is modifiable field during invoice verification i.e. MIRO. How to make the invoicing field non-modifiable during MIRO.
2) Unplanned delivery cost field is active for selection. There is no upper limit on unplanned delivery cost field. Even amount greater than PO value can be booked. I need to restict this like tolerance limit of around $100.
Please help me on urgency.
Thanks,
JKHi.
Use TCode OLMRLIST and input followwing information:
Transaction: MIRO
Screen Variant: 0001_000_0150
Program: SAPLFDCB
Screen: 150
Modify the Field INVFO-LIFRE as invisible. This will solve your first query.
For 2nd query I have got a work around solution for you.
1) Configure Transaction Key UPF - Unplanned delivery costs to a G/L Account.
2) Configure Postings of Unplanned delivery costs under MM - LIV using the following path.
SPRO --> Materials Management --> Logistics Invoice Verification --> Incoming Invoice --> Configure How Unplanned delivery costs are posted
Here you assign ID 2 - Different G/L Line
3) Create a validation as follows:
Prerequisite - BKPF-BLART = 'RE' AND BSEG-HKONT = ' G/L you configured in step 1'
Check - BSEG-WRBTR <= 'Amount which you want to restrict'
Message - Create an Error Message for it.
This will resolve your problem.
Regards,
Sanjay -
A/P Invoice Entry - Duplicate Invoice Error vs. Warning Message Control
In configuration, the duplicate invoice message has been defined as an error instead of a warning. This affects all invoice entry dialog transactions. Is there a method or approach to change only transaction F-63 Park Document so the message is a warning intead of an error? Thxs.
Hi
we have to activate certain setting in MM.
Step - 1
SPRO - MM - Logistic Invoice Verification - Incoming Invoice - Set Check for Duplicate Invoices - Activate Check box for reference field.
Step - 2
In Vendor Master XK02/FK02 goto Payment Transaction & click on check box - Check double Inv
Step - 3
There is also a Std Report for checking the invoices for which same reference feild was given
S_ALR_87012340
Hope its useful, give if found useful
Regards,
ram -
MRBR- invoice verification block- relation to FI doc
Hi gurus, please help me in the below issue.
An invoice was posted using MIRO and due to price variance it is automatically blocked as 'R' for invoice verification.
And this invoice was waiting to br released from MRBR.
But, One of our users went into FB02 and changed the payment block on the FI doc (FI doc which originated from posting MIRO)
and this invoice is also paid now.
But when we run MRBR the same MIRO invoice is still appearing as blocked, I think there is a disconnect in SAP
OR
I didnt configure the system,so that when an invoice is cleared for payment from FI side it should also be synched with MM on a real time basis.
Is there a OSS note on this, please advise
Thank You
MSJHello,
Please refer OSS Note 394370 - FAQ: Invoice release - frequently asked questions.
In this notes, there is an answer for your question. I clarify below.
In Release 4.0B or 4.5B an incoming invoice was posted with the logistics invoice verification, the invoice was not blocked for payment. After the posting of this incoming invoice, you manually set a payment block in the FI follow-on document, for example by using Transaction 'Change document' (FB02).After the release upgrade to 4.6B or higher and after the run of generation report RM08RBKPBLOCKED, Transaction MRBR displays the incoming invoice as blocked. Why?
This has technical reasons.The system cannot distinguish whether the FI follow-on document was provided with a payment block already during the posting of the invoice or only subsequently.
This causes no damage.If you want to release the invoice for payment, you can use Transaction MRBR as usual.
I hope it helps to you.
Regards,
Burak -
DUPLICATE INVOICE VERIFICATION CHECKL
Hi
How to set control for duplicating invoice verification.
Like the same Delivery note or the Freight passing twice to be checked by an error message
Please help
KrishnaSPRO-MM-invoice verification-incoming invoice-Set Check for Duplicate Invoices
In this step, you can configure for each company code if the system is to check for duplicate invoices when you enter invoices.
This check should prevent incoming invoices being accidentally entered and paid more than once.
You can choose whether to activate or deactivate the check criteria of company code, reference document number and invoice date for each company code. The more criteria that you activate, the lower the probability of the system finding a duplicate invoice. The Accounting documents are checked first, followed by documents from Logistics Invoice Verification (only incorrect invoices or those entered for verification in the background).
When checking duplicate invoices, the system compares the following attributes in the standard system:
Vendor
Currency Company code
Gross invoice amount Reference document number
1. Invoice date If the system finds an invoice that matches all
attributes, the system
- displays a customizable message.
- If you are entering credit memos, subsequent debits, or subsequent
- credits, the system does not check for duplicate invoices.
- The exception is the Argentina country version, where the system
checks
- for duplicate invoices and credit memos.
- If a previously processed document is later cancelled and then
entered
- again, no message is displayed.
Requirements
The system only checks for duplicate invoices in Materials Management
if you specify a reference document number when entering the invoice.
In Customizing (IMG) for Invoice Verification, you can specify that the
system check the following attributes
Reference document number
Invoice date
Company code
Because there are fewer attributes to check, it is more likely that the system will find a duplicate invoice.
Standard settings
All check criteria are activated in the standard system.
Example
The following document has been entered and posted:
Reference document number: 333
Invoice date: 28.04.00
Gross invoice amount: 100,00
Currency: EUR
Vendor: Wolf
Company code: Hamburg
The settings for checks for duplicate invoices in Customizing have
been maintained as follows:
The field reference document number and company code are not selected.
This means that these attributes will not be checked. Now enter the
following invoice:
Reference document number: 334
Invoice date: 28.04.00
Gross invoice amount: 100,00
Currency: EUR
Vendor: Wolf
Company code: Berlin
Result
By entering the reference document number and entering an invoice,it is possible to check for duplicate invoices.
The reference document number and the company code contain different data than the invoice you entered. These attributes are not checked because you have deselected them in Customizing.
All other attributes are equal. The system displays a message telling you that a duplicate invoice has been found.
If, for example, you had selected the reference document number in Customizing, the system would check this and recognize that this invoice is different to the previously entered invoice. The system would not then display a message.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Installing Oracle 8.1.7 with PS on Win 2000 cluster
Sorry for bad English. I'm have problem. I have Oracle 8.1.7 with PS. I need setup Oracle with Parallel Server on cluster with Windows 2000 AS, but during setup Oracle no found cluster. In documentation talk about need Operation System Depend layer f
-
Preview instead of Illustrator 10
Was working in Illustrator 10 last nite on several files and, on looking back into the project folder, found that some, but not all, of the files had a Preview icon and .pdf suffix instead of Illustrator and .ai. I definitely did not save the files a
-
How to print a pdf without user interaction (With C#)
My boss assigned me a task that to get the ImagePreview of 1st page of PDF. My thought is to print the 1st page of PDF to file(virtual print to file), and get the image source, but there comes the problem: How can print a pdf without user interaction
-
I have the newest Flashplayer, newly installed, AND the latest Internet Explorer. (operating system: Windows Vista). When I open a Flash site I ALWAYS have to load twice (load, then refresh) to see the content. No error message, site seems to load--b
-
How can i configure Airport Extreme as a bridge instead of a router ? Is there any technical documentation that help me with this issue ? thank you, Paulo