DV PAL Widescreen 16:9 Bitmap Export Issue

I've searched past questions concerning this issue, but unfortunately past questions have not yielded a definitive answer or workable solution in my case.
I have a project shot in DV PAL Widescreen format on a Sony HVR-Z5E. My Sequence settings are: 720x576 DV1/DV PAL 16:9 (1.4587). Captured video is showing as 720x576 (1.4587) AVI 25fps.
I am creating a freeze frame by exporting to Windows Bitmap from the sequence. I am setting Media export aspect as DV PAL Widescreen 16:9 (1.4587) - the same as the source setting. In the output monitor source/output looks identical. So it looks like I am exporting correctly - I can only assume.
But having done the export, the bitmap image looks 4:3 with squeezed sides. Importing back into the sequence confirms this - it's 720x576 (1.094). I have exported using both Widescreen setting and Square Pixel setting, both produce 4:3 aspects.
Why is AME not exporting in the correct aspect according to the settings? Why is it maintaining a 4:3 aspect? How can I successfully export to Bitmap and retain the existing 16:9 and bring it back into my project?
Additional: I do not require my export to pass through any other software, just to capture the still frame and import it back into the project.

Thanks so much you guys - yep, that fixed it. The import after interpretation fixed the issue and I have a beautiful integrated freeze frame in the correct aspect. Thanks also Colin for the TIFF solution.
Now as to who gets the "Correct Answer" points? You will agree, that three helpful and correct answers all within about 5 minutes of each other should warrent equal thanks - don't you agree? If I click "Helpful Answer" for all three of you, will that work? Will the system allow this?
If not, then please accept my thanks and appreciation. I'll let God sort it out later

Similar Messages

  • PAL Widescreen Render Issues

    Hello Adobe,
    I'm in need of some desperate help. For quite awhile now all video not matter what quality or format has rendered out terrible looking video. I usually work within After Effects and render out graphics using adobe media encoder. I create graphics in a HD composition (720p) and add to AME queue for render and change the preset to PAL DV Windscreen which results in terrible render quality. I have some examples below and all settings used. I need these videos in PAL for DVD render.
    Here is my workflow and settings.
    After Effects:
    1280X720, 25P 8bpc
    Graphic has been pre-comped with continuously rasterize enabled.
    AME
    MPEG2
    PAL Widescreen, Progressive.
    Screenshots for more information:
    I have done a very basic graphic to test the quality  - Render Quality test - YouTube
    Help would be much appreciated, Thanks.

    Hi
    He described the problem that the menu would not let them select any buttons, and that the menu was cut off top and bottom.
    What size did you use to build your menu backgrounds and overlays?
    Anyone have any suggests on how to get the first play to work?
    It uses to be so simple as selecting what item do you want to run first in DVD Inspector in DVDSP. What element is your first play? The Menu? You cuold try building a very short track (3/5 secs), with just black image and use that as first play (or a simple slideshow with a single black image). I have heard around the forums about some issues with some specific players with a menu as first play.
    Hope that helps !
      Alberto

  • Why does a dv PAL widescreen project export at 4.3?

    Hello everyone,
    I have for some months been puzzled by an export problem with DV PAL widescreen. I can import my footage ok, and in iMovie it plays back perfectly at the correct aspect ratio.
    However, when I want a full quality export, the resulting movie is 4.3 - why?
    I can get round this by going into custom settings and entering my own size, but why is this necessary?
    A related problem has just occurred when trying to score a similar movie in Garageband. Despite being widescreen at source, the movie that goes into GB is 4.3. Am I missing something obvious here?
    Many thanks.

    composites of Photo to Movie and iMovie footage, exported to a Quicktime movie, which is then typically dropped back to a much larger iMovie project, so timecoding isn't really important at this stage.
    Photo to Movie material is progressive and don't have timecode so nothing is lost there.
    what exactly is interlacing and why is it of benefit
    http://www.sjoki.uta.fi/~shmhav/SVCDon_aMacintosh.html#interlacing

  • Exporting DV PAL Widescreen to AE CS4 - Squezzed comp

    Please help. Am I missing something here. When exporting footage from FCP7 to AE CS4 my footage and the comp for that matter appear squezzed. the footage is 720X576 , DV-PAL Pixel Aspect:CCIR 601 .the comp is preset DV PAL - widescreen. Problem i have is how can I be sure how the effect looks in widescreen if its created 'squeezed'.

    Try exporting from FCP again using Quicktime Conversion.
    In there set the option
    VIDEO: Compressor DV PAL, 25 fps, interlaced, there's the option to set 16:9 aspect as well.
    AUDIO: 48 kHz, 16 bits stereo, best
    Fast Streaming: OFF
    I think this way AE will recognise the file as being anamorphic.
    Otherwise set th x scale in AE to 1,33
    Rienk

  • MPEG DVD Pal Widescreen at 1.458 PAR, what were Adobe Thinking?

    Okay apart from the fact that Adobe wanted to stiff me for another £999 to upgrade from the CS3 Production Premium suite to CS5.5, my first HDV project on the new system messed up; and I thought I was moving forward (apart from my bank balance) phew got that off my chest.  Whichever way you look at this and no matter how many technicians tell us otherwise, DVD players, You Tube, Vimeo, well the world really have been happy using a PAR of 1.422222 for PAL Widescreen and now Adobe are using 1.458 the "correct" PAR for the BBC apparently having read previous threads (well yippee da).  This doesn't help me uploading my videos for a client to You Tube, Vimeo or a DVD and having black bars either side, they couldn't care less whether it is the correct standard for the BBC or not they just want their footage to look like everyone else's.  What are you playing at Adobe, just give us another option in Media Encoder to export the same way we have been happy doing for years and stop rolling over for the BBC.  Incidentally I upload MPEG2 DVD to You Tube and have been getting good results so that is why I am using MPEG2 for You Tube and Vimeo (but I'm sure someone will now give me a good reason not to).   I have been fighting Adobe's (and Window's)  corner for the last god knows how many years while the Mac crew have been tempting me with that alluring mistress FCP, more stable audio and better colour resolution.  Adobe sort this out we've had enough of this nonsense, what is it with big companies they become god like in their sheer arrogance, give us what we want and stop toying with your minions.  This really hacks me off.

    I understand the frustration that your tone implies, but you've run off the tracks here.
    The computer world uses square pixels.  Vimeo, YouTube, etc.  When people upload anything but square to those services, the resulting picture is distorted, as it's displayed in square pixels.  And I see a lot of distorted videos on YouTube.
    http://support.google.com/youtube/bin/static.py?hl=en&guide=1728585&page=guide.cs
    I'm fairly certain that if you upload an MPEG2 to YouTube, they're going to recompress it to FLV or MP4 for you.  It's not one of their "supported formats."  So, I wouldn't be surprised if they muck it up.
    £999 to go from CS3 to CS5.5. sounds like a pretty good deal to me... that's a three version jump.  I also believe Adobe has become more responsive to customer input in the past few years, and not just "rolling over" for big clients.  But, those are opinions.
    Mitchell Remes wrote:
    Okay apart from the fact that Adobe wanted to stiff me for another £999 to upgrade from the CS3 Production Premium suite to CS5.5, my first HDV project on the new system messed up; and I thought I was moving forward (apart from my bank balance) phew got that off my chest.  Whichever way you look at this and no matter how many technicians tell us otherwise, DVD players, You Tube, Vimeo, well the world really have been happy using a PAR of 1.422222 for PAL Widescreen and now Adobe are using 1.458 the "correct" PAR for the BBC apparently having read previous threads (well yippee da).  This doesn't help me uploading my videos for a client to You Tube, Vimeo or a DVD and having black bars either side, they couldn't care less whether it is the correct standard for the BBC or not they just want their footage to look like everyone else's.  What are you playing at Adobe, just give us another option in Media Encoder to export the same way we have been happy doing for years and stop rolling over for the BBC.  Incidentally I upload MPEG2 DVD to You Tube and have been getting good results so that is why I am using MPEG2 for You Tube and Vimeo (but I'm sure someone will now give me a good reason not to).   I have been fighting Adobe's (and Window's)  corner for the last god knows how many years while the Mac crew have been tempting me with that alluring mistress FCP, more stable audio and better colour resolution.  Adobe sort this out we've had enough of this nonsense, what is it with big companies they become god like in their sheer arrogance, give us what we want and stop toying with your minions.  This really hacks me off.

  • NTSC & PAL Widescreen DVD from Flash Animation

    Hey Everyone. I have a question regarding a project I am finishing up. I created an animation in flash that is being exported to both NTSC Widescreen DVD and PAL Widescreen DVD.
    I started with 1024x576 in flash and created a sweet animation with audio. (Its a 1 min animation that will be looped for conventions etc)
    For NTSC
    From Flash I exported a 853x480 animation and imported it into FCP to add some fades to the beginning and end and make a few tweaks. I exported out another 853x480 video and imported it into DVDSP set to NTSC Widescreen. I burned the disc and everything looks great on my screen (letterbox on my crappy home tv)
    For my PAL version I followed a similar process.
    From Flash I exported a 1024x576 animation and imported it into FCP to add some fades to the beginning and end and make a few tweaks. I exported out another 1024x576 video and imported it into DVDSP set to PAL Widescreen.
    The thing I noticed is that the video in the viewer seems stretched where as the NTSC looked perfect.
    Am I missing something here? Where did I go wrong. Should i have set the video size smaller in FCP and outputted the proper video size (NTSC 720 x 480 and PAL 720 x 576) to bring into DVDSP? I don't know why one would look ok and the other would look stretched.
    Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
    Fish

    Fish:
    Try this in FCP:
    PAL VIDEO
    - Select Easy Setup DV PAL
    - Create a new sequence and open it
    - Go to menu Sequence > Settings...
    - Change Quicktime Video Settings Compressor from DV-PAL to uncompressed 8 bit
    - Check the anamorphic option
    - Import your movie and make it fit the canvas (check the Distort option in the Motion tab)
    - Do your edit
    - Export your timeline as Animation.
    Same for the NTSC but using DV NTSC Easy Setup and so . . .
    If I don't missed something your movies must be fine in DVDSP.
    Hope it helps!
      Alberto

  • Bizzare export issue

    Here is a very weird export issue. Windows XP.
    Project is set at h264 1920x1080 mono audio 29.97 fps
    I have 30 shots that make up the sequence. Each shot is exactly 90 frames. I exported each sequence at h264 1920x1080 with one channel of audio. The first shot exports just fine and is 5 MB. The second shot exports at 10 MB. The third is 15 MB, the tenth shot is 50MB. But the picture is still 90 frames for each shot. BUT, when I export without audio each exported file is just 5 MB. If I look at the properties of each clip the duration of the video and audio is just 90 frames. If I open one of these clips in QuickTime Pro and re-export it as source then the files size goes back to 5 MB; same video, same audio yet with the correct file size.
    Anyone seen this before?
    Is there a setting that could be incorrect?
    -cablet

    Weird, man. Not sure what might cause that.

  • PAL Widescreen format between photoshop and After Effects

    Hi, I wonder if someone else has bumped into the problem I have and has a solution. I am working with Photoshop, After Effects and Premiere Pro(all CS3 levels) to create a project using still and moving images. I am using PAL widescreen (16:9) format for the first time so have cropped my still images in Photoshop to 1024 x 576 pixels. Starting a new project in After Effects I chose PAL/Widescreen and set the resolution to 1024x576. When I bring in my images and drop them to the timeline they have the same height as the AE screen but are significantly shorter than the displayed 1024 pixel size. If I drop the images into Premiere they will size to 1024 x 576. Am I doing something drastically wrong here ?

    Just to add to this, I am confused over exactly what is happening inside
    After Effects with regard to interpreting PAL footage!
    When you go to the Compositions Settings dialogue box there are two Presets
    on the drop down list for non-square pixels; PAL D1/DV and PAL D1/DV
    Widescreen.
    Both comps are 720 x 576 pixels.
    However when you go to the drop down list for Pixel Aspect Ratio the two
    options there for non-square pixels are PAL D1/DV (1.09) and PAL D1/DV
    Widescreen (1.46)
    According to my calculations:
    PAL 4:3 in square pixels = 768 x 576 (768 / 4 * 3 = 576)
    Doing the maths the Pixel Aspect Ratio rounds up to 1.07 not 1.09
    768 / 720 = 1.06666666667
    PAL 16:9 in square pixels = 1024 x 576 (1024 /16 * 9 = 576)
    Again doing the maths the Pixel Aspect Ratio rounds up to 1.42 not 1.46
    1024 / 720 = 1.42222222222
    If the Pixel Aspect Ratios given are correct then the Width of both
    Compositions should be 704 not 720!
    768 / 704 = 1.0909090909 which rounds up to 1.09
    1024 / 704 = 1.454545454545 which rounds up to 1.46
    Using the preset comp Width with the preset Pixel Aspect Ratios doesn't seem
    to add up or am I missing something fundamental here?
    Perhaps I should just import the footage using whatever Pixel Aspect Ratio
    into a PAL comp with square pixels and then just use the fit to comp command
    to make sure it really does fit!
    John (aka Jack)

  • Crystal JRC PDF Export Issue

    We are experiencing a PDF export issue with Crystal JRC version 12.2.202.  The PDF report shows 1 of 3 pages but ONLY the first page is generated.  When this occurs, ALL other users that are exporting to PDF experience the same issue with any multiple page report.  I can't find any errors in the log that would indicate what the problem is.  To resolve the issue, I have to recycle the WebLogic application server that hosts  the JRC, which would indicate something gets "locked" in memory and gets cleared when the app server is bounced.
    Any ideas on how to resolve this ?

    Hi Ted,
    Thanks for the response!
    Though, the mentioned Sun JVM Bug explains the root-cause, the Bug status also state that it is not fixed yet.
    Also, we are reluctant to change the JVM Option to -Xint due to unknown impacts on JVM optimizations.
    Is there a patch released for CrystalReports to deal with this behavior? We are using CRJ runtime 11.5.7.620 and seeking for a patch on this version.
    Thanks.

  • PP CS5.5 FLV To MP4 Export Issues / Problems

    I just upgraded from Production Premium CS5 to CS5.5. I do a fair amount of converting/exporting of imported FLV files (downloaded from internet news sites) to H.264/AAC w/ MP4 wrappers using Premiere Pro (PP) and Adobe Media Encoder (AME). My equipment is a 1+ yr. old HP Win 7 Pro w/ an Intel i970 Quadcore, 12 Gb RAM and MSI nVidia GTX 470 GPU. I have never experienced any queue or export issues w/ CS5 (at least that I noticed), but I am experiencing noticeably degraded queue export and direct export problems with these files in CS5.5.
    Description: (1) The queue export times for the exact same imported FLV clip(s) using the exact same sequence settings and H.264/MP4 export settings are noticeably slower in CS5.5 (sometimes 2x, depending on the export settings, e.g. using maximum render quality) than in CS5; (2) My MSI Afterburner GPU monitoring software indicates 5-10% GPU usage during queue/export in CS5, while indicating 0% GPU usage (flatline) in CS5.5; and (3) When I attempt to direct export these files using CS5.5 I get the following error message: "The source and output audio channels are not compatible or a conversion does not exist."
    I suspect that it may have something to do with "conforming" anomalies when the FLV file is imported into PP, but I would put that squarely in the category of rank speculation on my part.
    Has anyone experienced the same or similar problems or have any insight into what may be the problem(s)? Of course, thanks for any help/insight you can provide.
    Jim

    What do you mean by a better routine?
    A better compression routine than H.264.
    Is the quality better than H.264?
    Yes.
    Does this use an MOV wrapper?
    Yes.
    Also, would it import correctly into PPro?
    Yes.
    we would import files into PPro exported out of FCP and would get a red pixelated glitch during preview and export. Does this codec solve this problem as well if it is an MOV wrapper?
    I don't know anything about FCP.
    Sorry for all the questions, just want to get things right before diving into a new codec.
    It's harmless, and free.
    Download it and run some tests.

  • Simple flash export issue

    hello
    I'm trying to export a flash video using Adobe media encoder from Premier Pro, but when I do I get this error " there are no clips to build".
    I have another file that I am able to export and it does not have this problem.
    They are Windows Media files and play in Premier fine. I am using Premier Pro CS3.
    Lastly, I'm not a video expert but I really need to get these up on the web for work, there is a lot of pressure and I need to get it done.
    Regards,
    Tom

    fixed the exporting issue.

  • Encore Menu sizes for PAL widescreen SD

    Premier Pro CS 5.5 (v5.5.2)
    Encore CS5 (v5.1.0.342)
    Photoshop CS (v8.0)
    Hi all
    Bit of a NOOB question I'm afraid, but it sure is befuddling me! (NOOB to Encore that is, but an old hand at DVD authoring)
    According to the Encore documentation, PAL widescreen SD menus should be created 720x576 pixels, 1.42 pixel aspect ratio... this seems perfectly logical and is what I've done many times in the past when creating menus for my main DVD authoring app (DVDLab Pro).
    However, when editing PAL widescreen SD menus from within Encore in Photoshop, the pixel aspect ratio is set to 1.458. Indeed, within Premiere Pro all SD widescreen options are shown using a pixel aspect ratio of 1.458.
    Is the documentation incorrect, or have I been missing something fundamental all these years?
    Would appreciate anybodys thoughts & observations on this...
    Tim

    You have discovered a "bug" in the Encore documentation. The actual menus in the library are correct, but what help says about them is wrong.
    The "about creating menus in ps"
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/encore/cs/using/WS2C3F3ABD-6457-4ca0-898F-720B7E3D0C10.html
    and the par info page:
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/encore/cs/using/WSbaf9cd7d26a2eabfe807401038582db29-7fb2a.html
    are wrong - they use the old pars.
    Here are the correct pars from Premiere help:
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/premierepro/cs/using/WS03BF7479-8C7B-4522-8C75-210AD102524Ea.h tml

  • Exporting ISSUES! Help

    I am a relatively new user to lightroom.  I haven't had any exporting issues until today.  I am attempting to export a photo/photos to a specific folder with a custom name.  When I do this it exports the WHOLE library and NOT the edited photo.  What am I doing wrong??

    Lightroom usually exports all images that are highlighted. If you only want to export one image then make sure it is the only image that is highlighted.

  • Exporting issues after 4.2 upgrade

    Has anyone else experienced exporting issues after installing the 4.2 upgrade? It used to be a breeze but now I keep getting the message that a destination folder has not been specified even though I've done that. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated! Thank you.

    Are you using an Export preset, or setting the Export up manually each time? 

  • Creating a PAL Widescreen DVD from NTSC footage.

    First off, my iDVD is version 7.0.4
    If someone could help me out with a very precise workflow it would be great, because I have a project with a one day turn around and the DVDs have to play properly the next day.
    This is the (sparse) information I got from the company that needs the DVDs : "As long as the DVD is UK pal widescreen it will play on the monitors."
    In the past, if shooting in NTSC and transferring to PAL, I've had the DVDs professionally transferred. With this project, I won't have time to do that.
    I'm planning on shooting on a DVX100 and editing in FCP. If shooting in NTSC is going to cause problems, I can definitely rent a PAL camera instead. (And would prefer to do that than have to do too much in post to get to a PAL Widescreen DVD)
    Can you let me know what sequence settings I should use (for both the NTSC possibility and the PAL possibility) in FCP, and then exactly how to set up the DVD in iDVD? I know this is a super basic question- thanks in advance for your help.
    Please note: I need the most reliable, quick workflow- would rather spend some money on renting a PAL camera if that's a more reliable method than transferring footage.

    Thanks for the response! I just learned about an additional problem, unfortunately...
    The client has OTHER footage that was already shot in NTSC that they need edited into the project. So I pretty much have to shoot in NTSC. However, there is the additional option of uploading the final clip to a server instead of burnind DVDs... any advice? Can I use MPEG Streamclip to create Pal files (let's say quality doesn't have to matter as much...)

Maybe you are looking for

  • My iPod Touch connects to windows, but not my mac.

    Hi there,                I have just bought a Macbook Pro, and tried connecting my iPod Touch to it. It didn't work (nothing shows up on the iPod to say it's even connected). So I tried plugging it into my windows7 machine, and it works fine. I was w

  • Play only audio from RTMP Live audio/video stream

    Hi, I am working on Flex FMS video conference app, Is there any possibility to stop video and listen only audio of a broadcaster with RTMP Live without broadcaster detaching camera to Stream and should not affect other viewers video feed. Thanx & Reg

  • Exit For F-53 TCODE

    Hi all, Following is the Requirement. in T code F-53 or F-58, the systems shows the days in arrears for the particular invoice payment. When the user selects a particular line/ invoice, whose days in arrear is in negative, then the system should disp

  • HT1338 i have a new mac air . the usb wont work and i cant charge my i phone with it

    please help me out . i have a new mac air . when i conect my cable to usb socket wont work . it wont charge my i phone either . whats wrong

  • Question about bill!!!

    I signed up of the Friends & Family plan back in 2009. When I signed up, my family got the 1400 mins, unlimited text + two extra lines added. Those extra lines cost $9.99, this we knew. Now, correct me if I'm wrong (And I've been checking online and