DW CS3 Maxs CPU??

I am running Dreamweaver CS3 (v9.0 build 3453) under vista
home. DW8 ran fine but my office just updated to DW CS3 and now
when ever its open even just sitting there its peaking whatever
core its on around 80%-90%. Anyone else had this issue or know how
to correct it? Let me know if any other details might help.

Glad to hear you figured it out. Can you explain in more
detail exactly
what you did? Is this the Win XP setting you're talking
about?:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/875351
"You can view the DEP configuration for your computer in
System in Control
Panel. To do this, follow these steps:
1. Click Start, click Run, type sysdm.cpl, and then click OK.
2. Click the Advanced tab, and then under Performance, click
Settings.
3. In the Performance Options dialog box, click the Data
Execution
Prevention tab.
4. Note if Turn on DEP for essential Windows programs and
services only or
Turn on DEP for all programs and services except those I
select: is
selected. "
If I go to the Data Execution Prevention tab, it's set to
"Turn on DEP for
essential Windows programs and services only", which I'm
assuming is the
default setting, since I haven't touched this before. What
was your DEP set
to?
Thanks,
David Alcala
Adobe Product Support
"harpo_" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:f0a6rd$2eh$[email protected]..
> hmm.. fixed it by excluding dreamweaver.exe from the so
called 'data
> execution prevention'

Similar Messages

Dreamweaver CS3 (9) maxed CPU slow performance and FTP issues.

Dreamweaver CS3 (9) maxed CPU slow performance and FTP
issues.
Never mind...I found it.
Of course I have all the firewall, worm, scanning, phishing
filtering, full time protect, and everything else turned off when I
am working on a remote/testing site however I found the Symantec
antivirus email scan being enabled (doesn't it just interact with
my email program?) was getting in the way of DW9 ftp operations,
causing some lagging that was putting DW9 into an unstable mode
during and immediately after (10 seconds) ftp operations.
The CPU still spikes to 99% during ftp functions but DW9
works even though it's likely taxed to the max but when I turn off
email scan DW9 returned to a functioning state during ftp and
remote file view. Whatever it takes huh?
PS: email scanning only never effected DW8.02
My System Info: properly configured (as in: everything works
or I fix it) Toshiba - XP pro SP2 – Pentium 4 - 2.3GHz
– 1.5 GB ram – Intel extreme graphics card 64 MB ram
– Apache 2.2 server – PHP 5 – MySQL 5 -
phpMyAdmin – Dreamweaver 8.02 – Interakt Kollection
3.7.1 – Dreamwweaver 9 - DeVtoolbox – Flash –
GoLive - Photoshop - ImageReady – Illustrator – Acrobat
– CuteFTP – Putty SSH - blabla...)

Thanks for the response. I managed to Google the 'nobody' account and found the explanation.
As you say, I assumed the 'syslogd' process had to do with system logs. I did check the console and couldn't find anything of particular interest in the logs.
I'll continue to monitor but if anyone has any further suggestions please post.
One thing that might also have an impact... my available drive space is now down to less than 5gb (runs anywhere between 1gb and 5gb free depending on what I'm running). I know this causes problems for Parallels as it keeps moaning at me, but would it cause any problems with OSX?
Thanks again,
Tom

MS-6367 max cpu

Hi all,
Read earlier post on this subject but there was no definitive answer. As far as I can make out it may be possible to fit an XP2100+ after flashing the bios.
Is this possible? If not what is the max CPU that can be fitted?
My board is the green one with 3 pci slots and is ver 1.
Thanks for any help or info in advance
Rimgreaper

what fsb options do you have
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?threadid=38907&sid=&hilight=6367

X2100 max CPU temperature

Hi all
Searching the SUN docs all I can find for the x2100 (mark 1+2) is the 'operating temperature' of 2-38 Degrees C. I'd like to be able to relate this to the results I get from the internal IPMI sensors- CPU and case temps.
Does anyone know the reccomended max / min temperatures for the CPU and case temp?
I know the cpu shut down safety is at 80 Deg C but I'd like to know what's the max they can safely run at for a prolonged time without damage?
What's the max temp's you'd run your x2100's at constantly?
Cheers for any repsonses :)

Look up AMD's web site for max CPU temperature for your model of CPU. The critical thresholds are wrong, the CPU max temp is definitely way lower than 80 degree C.

Max CPU Supported?

Hi there,
Could someone tell me what is the max cpu speed supported for the msi 5182 (socket 7 & alladin 5 based) motherboard?
Thank you.

http://www.msi.com.tw/program/support/bios/bos/spt_bos_detail.php?UID=230&NAME=MS-5182
1.4 Update date 1999-9-9
Update Description - Fixed Windows98(R)SE Standby problem
- AMD(R) K6-III 450MHz
best i can find

Max cpu speed

My son has a compaq with a msi 6090 v3.0. The online manual says that it will support 2600+ or higher processor. But the MSI website says it will support 2200+ or higher. Doesn't sound like a big deal, but when i clicked on the relevant link entitled 'cpu support' it it had a "no" next to any processor with a higher speed than 2200+. Does anyone have any idea what the max cpu speed is that can be supported by this particular motherboard?
Thanks for any help.

CPU support for 6390 both 2 version is reported by BIOS ver:
BIOS Version:6390 ver1: W6390VMS.150 (ver. 1.50)
6390 ver2: W6390VMS.210 (ver. 2.10)
latest version on BIOS for 6390 ver1 is Version 1.8
latest version on BIOS for 6390 ver2 is Version 2.6(Update Description Support Duron Applebred FSB133 CPU)
if you update with latest BIOS for your mobo you may support higher CPUs
BIOS link here: http://www.msi.com.tw/program/support/bios/bos/spt_bos_detail.php?UID=80&kind=1

ICal in Leopard uses max CPU and must be force-quit

I'm having a problem with iCal 3.0 in Leopard. When left running, eventually it will start to use my entire CPU for no reason. I have tried wiping out all of its preference files, and deleted all my "subscribed" calendars (in case it was maybe stuck trying to update one), but it's still acting up. Interestingly, when it goes into this CPU hogging seizure, if I try to quit it normally at that time, the program will quit, but then immediately relaunches itself as "hidden" -- as if it needed to remain open to finish some kind of indexing or something. I find I need to then force quit it twice before it will stay closed and quit being a nuisance.
Something is definitely broken here.
On the other hand, at least the dock icon for it (appears to) always display the correct date now. Although I apparently can't leave iCal running anymore (unless I want to listen to my fan going full blast all day), I'm glad it no longer needs to actually be launched to realize it isn't July 17 every day of the year.
I've seen a few similar reports from other users. Has anyone found a workaround for this yet?

I did some more testing yesterday. I created a new user, launched iCal, played around with it a bit, and left it open for awhile. It never maxed out the CPU or became unresponsive, and appears to be working perfectly with a fresh set of calendars.
As I mentioned in my first post, I had already deleted all of the preference and .plist files in my regular user account, and that did not fix the problem. I have now concluded that there must be something "corrupt" in one of my calendar files (I don't think they are actually corrupt though; my guess is that iCal 3 just has some kind of bug that only occurs with some certain type of legacy data). If I could, I would simply delete those and start fresh, but I have far too much valuable information in there to do that. Unfortunately, it is not possible to export individual events; all I can do is backup and restore entire calendars. I tried that, and the problem continues, so I am at a loss as to how I can solve this without destroying several years worth of data.
As I am not willing to lose all of my old data, I guess I will just have to wait until this nasty bug in iCal 3 gets fixed.

ITunes Maxing CPU when next song plays

I installed the latest update of iTunes 7. Since then, while playing songs, iTunes fluxuates from 30% CPU to 65% with it occasionally maxing the CPU to 100% when a new song starts. The music sounds all garbled for about a second or two and locks up my whole machine. Then iTunes CPU drops back to in between 30% and 65% and the song plays fine. This did not happen with the initial release of version 7. Only after the first update was installed. If I pause the songs, the CPU drops down to below 20%. This also happens if iTunes is the only program I have running, just not as often. Any suggestions on how to fix this would be greatly appreciated. My laptop has a Intel Pentium M processor 1.60 GHz with 1 GB of RAM.

Sorry for my english ...
I have the same problem too. But I also saw that this appears when at every 10 seconds iTunes alternate/scrowling the artist name and the album name. In full screen, the cpu goes to 70%; in a small window, "only" 35%. When iconified, there is no problem. When it appens at the same time of a new music the sound is ****** for two seconds.
This problem don't appears in the version 6.
How to tell that to apple ?? This must be corrected !
Thanks !

Safari on Windows sometimes maxes CPU?

Anyone else have problem with Safari under Windows - for me it will sometimes just start maxing the equivelant of one of my CPU cores and won't stop until I exit Safari and restart. It doesn't happen consistently (like always on the same web site) but it happens often. Anyone else have this issue or have a solution?

What plug-ins do you have?
Any 3rd party extensions?
The ability to switch a single plug-in off, would have to try disable all plug-ins.
Disable page previews.
Same for javascript, can't disable/enable on specific sites.
On Mac, Click2Flash works well to limit loading flash plug-ins.
Some sites insist on running scripts constantly, and/or attempt to reload a page (page hit counter to show more hits than real?).
Safari 5 doesn't seem to be well threaded. Each tab fights for processor cycles and isn't able to make efficient use of multiple cores/threads. Try opening 10 tabs concurrently. Now do that same with any other browser like Firefox or IE9.
My solution is to use other browser and disable Active-X and plug-ins and scripts unless I give permission to load, and use Safari with those turned off by default and only load unless I need to or want something. Safari tends to display and look better, but that's it.

How to get max CPU usage

I'm using Win 7 64bit and CS6 64bit.
However, when I do some heavy editing, like anything that takes a few minutes of CPU processing, I tend to look at the task manager only to find that 4 cores are utilizing 50% at max thus taking longer to compute the results.
Is there a way to maximize CPU usage by Photoshop? I would like it to use 100% when performing tasks to speed up process time. Is there a windows plug in?
Thanks,
Gil.

It depends on how each of the portions of Photoshop you're using was implemented. There's little you can do to influence it. About the only thing I can think of is that you can adjust the Tile Size and Cache Levels values in the Edit - Preferences - Performance dialog. On some systems with some kinds of operations smaller tiles can make things work faster and with others large tiles are better. But be forewarned: I've never seen changing those values make a very big difference.
One other thing you can do is adjust the max RAM you allow Photoshop to use. Your OS probably itself doesn't need more than 1 to 2 GB, and if you don't specifically have another application you want to run that uses a lot of RAM you'll want to change the Photoshop RAM usage so as to leave just a few GB for the OS. On a system with a huge amount of RAM that might mean setting it to 90% or more. If Photoshop can keep things in RAM, your CPU will be busier because it won't be waiting on swapping data to/from disk.
Make sure you restart Photoshop before testing any changes.
There are filters that you SHOULD see use 100% of all your cores - example, try a Filter - Blur - Radial Blur on a large image. There are other things that simply don't, because either there isn't a good way to multi-thread the activity (e.g., data compression during save) or the Photoshop implementation is just limited because it's not been updated since the advent of multi-core systems (e.g., some of the old artistic filters).
When I was doing performance testing, I created an action that does a lot of the kinds of things I normally do to images, so that I could run it repeatedly and time the results, looking for differences as a result of choosing the different settings. There are Photoshop benchmarks on the web that do much the same thing, and while it might not be a good match for what you do (none of them were for me), they ARE interesting in that they allow you to compare your performance to other systems out there, to make sure everything's working right.
-Noel

Maxing CPU during export

Okay. I admit I'm pretty new to video editing. I've spent the past year or so muddling through with VSDC doing as little editing work as possible because that program is as user-friendly as a bengal tiger with rabies. I bought Premiere Elements 13 so I could have a more stable, usable editing software that I could do more interesting stuff with.
Problem is, when I try and export a video it goes just fine for the first 8% or so but then it immediately redlines my CPU. I have no idea what's causing it. I'm trying to export in WMV 1920x1080 (custom made because apparently Elements doesn't like WMV in HD and it's the only type that keeps the file size from being ridiculous).
Specs:
Intel i5-3470 CPU 3.2GHz
16GB RAM
GTX 760 graphics card
500GB SSD
I really hope someone can help. I don't want to have to go back to VSDC.

Updated. Hadn't done that. I assumed it would download the most recent version automatically. Unfortunately it didn't solve the problem. Initial CPU usage dropped from 30% to about 28% but it just redlined at the same progress as before.
The SSD is the default C drive yes, and Premiere is installed on it. Operating system is Windows 8.1 (with classic shell, if it matters).
Estimated output file size is 537.81MB. Duration is 37min, 51.51sec. And I'm only exporting to hard drive.
I would look at the results of the export but that would require the process finishing. Twice, in fact. And since the estimated completion time is ever increasing (it was over an hour by around 17%, up from 20 minutes at the start), there's not much chance of me doing that unless absolutely necessary. It'd take up most of my day at the rate it was going.
As a test to see if it was something to do with the custom output format I tried in the Youtube HD format. That maxed out my CPU immediately but maintained estimated completion time of about 20 minutes. Not exactly an ideal solution though. I don't want to lock up my computer for the several hours it takes to export footage.
Thanks for your help in advance!

How max cpu for AME?

so it makes some sense that AME would not max out my cpu if its supposed to render in the background- but is there a way that I can tell AME to use all available resources on a render? currently when i send files from premiere to AME to render it is only utilizing 20-50% of cpu, how can I increase that to 100% ? For comparrison, if i render directly in Premiere i get the same 20-50% but in AE if i render a comp - it will utilize 60-85% of cpu, and other programs like xilisoft video converter if i convert 1 video it will utilize 60-70% of cpu. Things i have tried without success: 1. rendering project which is on one SSD to an alternate SSD 2. shutting down all other adobe programs when AME is rendering.

When developing x264pro for PPro/AME I came across this bottleneck - ie not seeing 100% cpu load.
So...I did a test - I made a dummy encoder that simply dropped the raw uncompressed frame on the floor (not even to disk). This test showed how fast AME/PProHeadless can serve up frames. It's no-where near 100% loadon all cores on a quad or higher core computer. Therefore there are bottlenecks. My test used a static synthetic video frame so that removed harddisk delay from the equation since there was no source footage from disk. The delay is the processing within AME.
The reality is that AME via direct file or via PProHeadless is relatively slow at creating the raw uncompressed frames to hand off to the encoder. (They are called Exporters internally).
If the Exporter is doing a compression scheme that is hard on the cpu (eg h.264) it will gobble up all the remaining cpu potential. Thus you'll see 100% on all CPUs.
If the Exporter was written properly, in parallel with the compression (ie "encoding"), AME/PPro is creating (ie "rendering") the next frame using a 1 or more cpu cores.
If the export is a complex compression scheme by the time it finishes encoding that frame, AME/PPro will have already finished making the next uncompressed frame. That's a good thing because there is no wasted time since the compression gobbled up the cpu when the next raw frame was finished and Adobe sat around doing nothing.
On the flip side...
If you're exporting with a simple compression scheme, eg DV, MJPG, MPEG-Intra the exporter will have to twiddle its thumbs waiting for the next frame. It's these times you see all the delays in the creation of the raw rendered uncompressed frame.
Yes, hard disk speed and available memory will shorten the delays in making a raw frame but the reality is that for some codecs it's just not practical to render the raw frame & encode it using 100% of the CPU potential.
conclusion:
1: just because you're at 100% on all cpus doesn't mean that you're doing good. You could simply have a poorly implemented [complex] encoder.
2: just because you're not at 100% doesn't mean that it's hard disk or memory. It could just be the necessary time the AME needs to render an uncompressed frame.
If #2 is your problem narrow down the reason. For example, If you re-size your output in AME from a Imported File then the resize is done on the CPUs. If you drop that same file in a sequence of the same size and frame rate then Queue export from PPro to AME you then have the Mercury Playback Engine at your disposal. The MPE is 10x faster at doing the resize vs a multi-core CPU. - So.... if you're going to resize, put the darn thing in a seqeunce and queue it!
'hope that helps.

HP Pavillion dv9920ed CPU Upgrade, What is Max CPU

I think the subject says enough.
What is the MAX compatable CPU for a HP Pavillion dv9920ed, ProductNumebr: FM650EA
I can't find any info except that it's deliverred with a intel T5750. I have a T7500 laying around, but can it also handle a T9300 for example?

Hi:
As long as you have BIOS vF.45 or newer installed, you can go higher...
Please see the BIOS release notes for vF.45...
Fix/Enhancement
Adds support for Intel Core 2 Duo Mobile Processors T8100, T8300, T9300, and T9500.
Fixes issue where the 1394 port may not work after resuming from Standby mode.
One word of warning...if you have installed W7 on your notebook, you cannot update the BIOS.
It can only be done in Vista.
Failure to heed this warning = dead dv9920.

Max CPU temperature

Hi, I have a MacBook Air in 2010. What is the maximum temperature can reach the processor so as not to cause damage? I ask because sometimes I use HandBrake and the CPU temperature sometimes reaches 95 degrees Celsius.

100 degrees Celsius is the max. The MBair will throttle back processors and spin up the fans to compensate. If it can't cool the machine to remain in operating limits then a thermal check will occur and it will power off.

Dreamweaver CS3 hogging CPU - any fix?

I finally upgraded from GoLive CS2 to Dreamweaver CS3. (If it ain't broke, don't fix it!)
Dreamweaver at idle is using over a quarter of my CPU! (Mac Mini 1.83GHz Intel Core Duo, 2GB RAM) No well-written program does this so I figure there must be something that I can turn off that was defaulted to "on" so I can speed up my computer.
It's so bizarre that it demands almost half a GHz—460,000,000 cycles per second, folks—just sitting there!
Thanks!
Andrew

Thanks for the suggestion, but no. Activity Monitor is showing it's distinctly the Dreamweaver CPU process, plus I updated the software just a few days before.
I've seen other discussions online posted in the past couple of years about the same CPU-hogging problem on Mac and Windows boxes. There was some Windows patch (I believe it was from an unauthorized 3rd party) that purportedly fixed the problem, but I didn't see anything for Macs and I wasn't sure if there was any official solution (even if it involves upgrading to CS4) . . . other than live with a program that's making your system slow down for no good reason.
Thanks,
Andrew

DW CS3 Maxs CPU??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for