Dynamic modifcation rule / Skip

Hi
It is hard for me to understand the rule and the skip procedure .
Can any explain me please with and without skip( Settings )
Stage Change Defined for Inspection Stage
No of inspections
New stage
Max skip duration
Rejection
New inspection
Thanks
JJ

Hi,
Let me try to explain the DMR in short.
Let us suppose for example, we have set Sampling procedure to pick 50% of the Inspection Lot and do UD based on the RR.
Now consider following cases:
For 1st time GR --> We inspected 50% of the Lot and it is cleared as good Quality
For 2nd time GR --> We inspected 50% of the Lot and it is cleared as good Quality
For 3rd time GR --> We inspected 50% of the Lot and it is cleared as good Quality
For 4th time GR --> We inspected 50% of the Lot and it is cleared as good Quality
For 5th time GR --> We inspected 50% of the Lot and it is cleared as good Quality
... so on and so far.
This is a case with no DMR.
As inspection Process is a cost for the company; there is a arguement in favour of skipping Inspection process for the 6th time as the earlier history is good. It can be safely assumed (based on the earlier pattern) that even if we do GR for 6th time,it will pass as Quality Inspection. Dynamic Modification tries and maps this situation in SAP.
The earlier scenario will now look like below with DMR (which tries to vary Inspection Scope based on UD):
Stage 1: For 1st time GR --> We will inspect 50% of the Lot --> We will call it Normal Inspection
Stage 2: For 2nd time GR --> We will inspect 20% of the Lot if UD for stage 1 is Okay --> We will call it Reduced Inspection
Stage 3: For 3rd time GR --> We will inspect  0% of the Lot if UD for stage 1 & 2 is Okay --> We will call it Skip Inspection
Stage 4: We will inspect 100% of the Lot if any point the UD is rejected for the lot --> We will it Tightened Inspection
These Inspection Stages are defined in the DM Rule.Normal,Skip,Reduced and Tightened is called the Inspection Severity.
Other Important Points
1. The DMR can be applied for Plant, Material and Vendor Combinations and is called Dynamic Modification Criteria.
2. The Dynamic Modification, Stage Changes can happen while UD or while Lot Creation. We need to define this in the Inspection Plan Header.
3. DMR is often used in sync with Sampling Scheme to change Inspection Lot quantity based on the Inspection Severity
4. There are further finer points wrt DMR that will only become clear once you start using it.
Please let me know if this sounds Okay.
Thanks,
RKM.

Similar Messages

  • QM:Maximum skip duration in dynamic modification rule

    Hi
    Can anybody explain how the system behaves with   
    QM:Maximum skip duration in dynamic modification rule.
    Gobinathan G

    Hi,
    In dynamic modification rule you maintain the inspection modification based on the quality level. You mention the maximum skip duration for resting the skip status if the inspection lot is not created during the specified period after creation of last inspection lot. That means the Skip status will be reset to Inspection status if the lot is not created during the specified period & you will have to inspection the lot instead of skipping. If the lot is generated within the period, then you will be able to skip the inspection.
    Regards,
    Prashant

  • Dynamic modification rule

    Hi, what is dynamic modification rue functionality in qm? pls explain with one example how to use the same.

    DMR: simple words means when you dynamicall want to change the stages of the inspection.that means you want to reduce the inspection or skip the lots or tighten the inspection.
    DMR mainly used for reducing the cost of inspection.
    There are many links which are available with example for the same.
    Re: DM rule
    DMR
    Re: Dynamic modification
    Dynamic Modification Rule (DMR) at lot creation
    DMR - QUALITY LEVEL
    Re: DMR @ Char level
    DMR inspection stage

  • Dynamic Modification Rule (At Lot Level) In Quality

    Dear All
    Please explain me in detail how to use Dynamic Modification Rule (At Lot Level) In quality Module.
    Thanks & Regards
    Rahul Bhardwaj

    Dear,
    In material master under (QM view) active "Skip allow"  indicator.
    Skip lotting in SAP is some what different. SAP does not actual prevent the creation of the inspection lot. It simply sets a status of SKIP on the inspection lot. The lot is still there and if desired, it can be used. Once a characteristic is accessed in the lot, it becomes a normal inspection lot.
    You need to setup an auto UD batch job for processing the skip lots and closing them. Skip lots have their own "wait" time defined in plant QM config settings.
    That means by DMR you can not stop the inspection lot generation.
    Hope clear to you.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Dynamic Modification Rule In Quality Module

    Dear All
    Please explain me in detail how to use Dynamic Modification Rule (At Lot Level) In quality Module.
    Thanks & Regards
    Rahul Bhardwaj

    Hi,
    Dynamic Modification Rule
    Definition
    The basic data record contains the definition of the inspection stages, the dynamic modification time (at lot creation or after the usage decision has been made), and the conditions for the inspection stage change. Inspection stage changes occur on the basis of the inspection results that are recorded for inspection lots and inspection characteristics (that is, on the basis of their acceptance or rejection).
    Use
    You can vary the inspection scope using dynamic modification rules. You can store a dynamic modification rule in one of the following places:
    In the inspection plan at the header level
    In the inspection plan at the characteristic level
    In the inspection setup of the material master record at the inspection type level
    Structure
    A dynamic modification rule contains the definition of the inspection stages, the dynamic modification time, and the conditions that lead to an inspection stage change.
    There are always two options that apply to the conditions for an inspection stage change: An acceptance (OK) and rejection (not OK). The system uses these conditions to update the quality level, which always reflects the current status.
    The functions for maintaining and displaying dynamic modification rules are primarily contained on three screens:
    On the initial screen, you enter the identifier for the dynamic modification rule.
    On the header data screen, you maintain a short text and the blocking indicator, and define the time of dynamic modification (at lot creation or when the usage decision is made) and the reset period.
    The reset period defines the period of time, which must elapse before the quality level again uses the initial inspection stage specified in the dynamic modification rule as the current inspection stage.
    On the inspection stages screen, you edit the inspection stage data (inspection severity, skip, initial inspection stage, and short text). You create the rules for the inspection stage change on this screen.
    In QM, the inspection stage describes a test or inspection status that is based on the inspection history and predefined rules. Different inspection stages mean that there are also different inspection scopes and/or inspection severities.
    Creating a Dynamic Modification Rule
    1.Choose Logistics ® Quality management ® Quality planning ® Basic data ® Sample ® Dynamic modification rule ® Create.
    2.Enter the identifier for the dynamic modification rule on the initial screen or choose Copy to use an existing dynamic modification rule as a copy model.
    3.Choose Dynamic modification rule to carry out the following activities on the header data screen:
    Edit the short text for the dynamic modification rule.
    Define the time of dynamic modification (at lot creation or usage decision).
    Define the reset period.
    Set the blocking indicator if you want to prevent the dynamic modification rule from being used in an inspection plan.
    4.Choose Next screen to carry out the following activities on the inspection stages screen:
    Define inspection stages.
    Define inspection severities for individual inspection stages.
    Identify skips.
    Identify the initial inspection stage.
    Maintain short texts for the inspection stages.
    5.Choose Stage change to carry out the following activities on the screen for creating the inspection stage change:
    Define the specifications for a stage change for an acceptance (OK)
    Define the specifications for a stage change for a rejection (Not OK)
    6.Choose Next screen to return to the inspection stages screen and save your entries.
    When you save the data, the system prompts you for a confirmation. If you want to include the dynamic modification rule in the allowed relationships for sampling procedures and dynamic modification rules (this is only necessary if a sampling procedure is used in a sampling scheme), you can switch directly to the assignment transaction by confirming this prompt. You define the assignment of sampling procedures and dynamic modification rules in this screen.
    If you do not confirm the prompt, the system returns directly to the initial screen and confirms that it has created the dynamic modification rule.
    Hope this helps.
    Award points if useful.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • Does the "The Project Owner has the same RBS value as the User" dynamic category rule include Status Managers?

    I tested the following scenario in Project Server 2010 and 2013:
    Assume you have three users: User1, User2, and User3.
    User1 has RBS value Org.UnitA
    User2 and User3 both have RBS value Org.UnitB
    User3 belongs to a group that gets permissions to view projects from a category with "The Project Owner has the same RBS value as the User" setting enabled.
    User2 creates ProjectABC and by default becomes the project Owner. User2 creates a task in the project, and by default becomes the Status Manager of the task.
    User2 then changes the project owner to User1 and republishes the project. User2 remains the Status Manager in the project task.
    User3 can still see ProjectABC. Apparently this is because User2, who has the same RBS value as User3, is still a Status Manager of project tasks.
    If I change User2 RBS value to Org.UnitA, then User3 can no longer see ProjectABC. Note that User2 is not the project Owner at this stage, but the change in User2's RBS still affects the visibility of the project.
    It seems to me that in "The Project Owner has the same RBS value as the User" dynamic category rule, the "Owner" should be "Owner or Status Manager".
    Is this a bug or by design?

    Hi Barbara,
    Thanks for going through the trouble of reproducing the behaviour. It's interesting to know that Effective Rights in Project Online displays different results.
    The system in which I tested this scenario is updated with the December CU, so I'm guessing you'll still get the same result after updating your environment.
    In my usage scenario, a user needs to create projects on behalf of other users, and then change the Owner. Unfortunately this doesn't change the Status Manager of tasks, and consequently the visibility of the project is not what was expected.
    The user who creates the project can change the Owner, but can't change the Status Manager. The new owner would have to open the project for editing in Project Pro, change the Status Manager value of every task, and republish. Precisely the sort of extra
    work that the users want to avoid.
    Using delegation might be a workaround, but opens up a whole new can of worms in terms of information security. It's unfortunate that the "The Project Owner has the same RBS value as the User" setting doesn't do what it says, but potentially
    opens up visibility of projects to a wider audience than intended.

  • Update was terminated when Dynamic modification rule is changed

    Hi Gurus,
    When short text is changed manually in Dynamic modification rules (QDR2), I saved it "Dynamic modification rule xxx was changed". Next I got the error message: "Update was terminated".
    Detail:
    System ID....   xxx
    Client.......   xxx
    User.....   xxxxxxx
    Transaction..   QDR2
    Update key...   xxxxxx
    Generated....   06.11.2009, 11:54:46
    Completed....   06.11.2009, 11:54:47
    Error Info...   Processeur ABAP : RAISE_EXCEPTION
    I think there is an incoherence in between tables QDDR & QDDRT.
    How can we fix this error?
    Thanks.
    Stéphane

    Hi
    sometimes it happens that system takes some time to save & update the data in the background.
    so wait for some time & again check .It will work.
    The data which if changes do not have any repercation on existing system  can be changed at any time.
    check the tables
    QDDR & QDDRT again
    Regards'
    Sujit

  • Dynamic Business Rules

    Hi,
    I am trying to create a dynamic business rule through endeca developer studio. I have created a zone, style and a rule.
    My rule doesn't contain any triggers and I have set it to "Everywhere". I have added a Featured records so that a particular record appears everytime. In Target tab, I have added a dimension value which is a Auto generated.
    But when I run baseline_update I do not see any promoted records in my endeca_jspref page. Is there anything which I am missing to reflect the promoted records in my endeca_jspref page? Please help.
    Thanks,
    Sav

    If you are using business rules I'm guessing you are on an earlier version of Endeca and/or not using Experience Manager. If so, is Workbench integration enabled and merch_rule_group_default.xml set up as a Workbench-managed file?  You can see this in the "ConfigManager" component, property list of webStudioMaintainedFileX".  If merch_rule is listed there, then the business rules configured via Developer Studio are ignored in favour of the ones set up in Workbench, so try running ./control/update_web_studio_config.sh, then adding the business rule via Workbench (http://<server>:8006/admin).
    Michael

  • How to Implement Dynamic Modification Rule for Material & multiple vendor Combination

    Hi Team,
         In dynamic modification rule for Material &  vendor combination, i have maintained material & vendor in Inspection plan at Material Assignments
    1.If i purchase same material from different vendors then how to implement ?

    Hi Balaji,
    I am not sure if i have followed your requirement.
    What do you want to do with Vendor Z? Do you want to inspect each lot from Z?
    If yes:
    Then Create 2 Inspection plans with same Operations and Same MICs, In Material Assignment, mention Vendor as Z so that 1st inspection plan will only be for Vendor Z. Do not enter DMR in Header.
    In 2nd inspection plan Enter DMR and do not mention any vendor so this plan will be applicable for all vendors except Z.
    If No:
    Then create Qm info record for vendor Z with "No inspection" set in QI06.
    Amol.

  • Dynamic Modification Rule Counter

    Hello Experts
    I am using DMR in my project. e.g 1 in 10 , 1 in 20. Inspect 1 and skip 10 or 20 etc.
    WHat I would like to know where I am during inspection i.e. counter , at a particular point in time how many lots are skipped so that I know when next one be inspected.
    To clarify further say my rule is inspect 1 and skip 10 . I have inspection 1 and skipped 3 . How do I know that I have skipped 3 and there will be 7 more skipped lots.
    Many Thanks
    Gaurav

    Hi Gaurav...
    Whenever There is Lot creation or Usage decision for a lot,Quality level updated depending upon DMR.
    If you want to see the counter of Dynamic modification along with what are inspection lots which are created,how many accepted and what was last UD...This can be seen through QDL or QDH2.
    Advantage with QDH2 is that you can reset counter.
    Counter can be seen when you execute QDH1/2/3 in "change layout" in addition to current level and next level.
    i hope you will find this useful...
    revert back for any querries...
    Sujit

  • Dynamic agent rule during approval

    Hi gurus,
    my question is based on a customer requirement.
    they want a n-step approval with dynamic agent determination: fine.
    then they want to maintain the substitutes: fine as well.
    But what they want to do is to change the workflow path based on the substitute.
    I mean: if the first aprover has set a substitute the first task goes to the substitute, but the following tasks have to follow the substitute hierarchy and not the original workflow path.
    So we don't think the standard system way to use the substitute is not enough, but we need to determinate in the beginning if a substitute was set for some approvers.
    The thing is that the substitute record is dynamic and has a validity end, and could be set after the workflow is started.
    Is it possible at every step recalculate the workflow path and the next approvers (so to discover if a substitute rule has be changed or created or deleted)?
    PS: we are using SRM 7.0 and the process controlled workflow.
    Thank you very much in advance!
    Regards,
    Maria

    Hi,
    Yes. Agent is determined in each step right after previous step is completed in SRM70 Process-Controlled Workflow.
    Please check following workflow objects.
    WS40000016
    TS40007943
    Rule 40000138
    FM /SAPSRM/WF_CORE_RESP_RESOLVER
    Regards,
    Masa

  • Dynamic agent rule changement during approval steps

    Hi gurus,
    my question is based on a customer requirement.
    they want a n-step approval with dynamic agent determination: fine.
    then they want to maintain the substitutes: fine as well.
    But what they want to do is to change the workflow path based on the substitute.
    I mean: if the first aprover has set a substitute the first task goes to the substitute, but the following tasks have to follow the substitute hierarchy and not the original workflow path.
    So we don't think the standard system way to use the substitute is not enough, but we need to determinate in the beginning if a substitute was set for some approvers.
    The thing is that the substitute record is dynamic and has a validity end, and could be set after the workflow is started.
    Is it possible at every step recalculate the workflow path and the next approvers (so to discover if a substitute rule has be changed or created or deleted)?
    PS: we are using SRM 7.0 and the process controlled workflow.
    Thank you very much in advance!
    Regards,
    Maria

    Hi Maria
    I mean today the workflow starts and the system calculates the path based on the substitute rules active.
    OK with that.
    But what if the substitute rule change tomorrow?
        How you are saying the substitute rule change tomorrow?.  You should not assume it. You should confirm it.  You cannot implement a work flow for tomorrow's requirement. Always there will be a change even if you implement for tomorrows change. Never do that. Do only for today's requirement.  
    My question is if it's possible to every step of the work flow change the agents.
        I feel that this approach is wrong. simple view i will give u to thing. take only 2 steps
    loop.
    1) for determining the approver based on business logic in one method.
    2) use the expression in the user decision step and send the work item for approval
    endloop.
    This i have explained for simple logic, create you own logic and apply on loop and endloop. It will work.
    Regards
    vijay

  • Dynamic Business Rules - Where to place

    Hi,
    I am doing POC for a fortune 10 client and they have some business rules before crud actions are going to take place in DB. We have very minimal tables (less than 10) and its small application but web service (btw, this has to be webservice app) consumers are around 200 per sec.
    The requirement with respect to business rules are also minimal (like 30 rules for entire project) but these rules will change very often(like once in a month). Assume these rules are on the enterprise level and not on the application level.
    I am looking for best possible solution to achieve by developing small rules engine or putting them into another xml and apply transformation once request arrives.
    I am confused of deciding which is better like putting business rules in xslt vs java business object. XSLT is allowing me to change rules with minimum impact on the system but it is hard to maintain and adding new rules (we are not anticipating any more new rules within next two years).
    On the other hand, If I put in Java business object then it allows lot of flexibility to inject new rules and easy to maintain with cleaner code.
    So, in short my questions are below.
    1. Is it good practice to put small set of business rules in xml/xslt?
    2.are there any alternative business rules engines are available?
    Any other suggestion related to above discussions are welcome.
    Thanks.

    I believe this is what you want.
    DROOLS - drools - dynamic rules for java
    http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=37037
    http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2005/08/03/drools.html?page=2
    good luck.

  • Dyanamic Modification Rule-Skip Lots -Question

    Dear Friends,
    Need help with this requirement
    Iam looking for DMR set for a scenario,where we have inspection carried out for a vendor for first 5 shipments ,if there are no issues found the inspections are not carried out.If in case the goods from vendor found defective in production floor ,the same is intimated to quality departement.Quality departement now monitors inspection for vendor goods for next 5 shipments ,
    So this cyclic skip upon 5 shipments is possible through DMR ,only question is if there is 5 shipment sucessful and based on the rule its goes for continues inspection skips,if there is quality issue with vendor goods found,how to make sure the system comes to normal inspection ???
    Let me know ,if this needs further details
    thanks,
    Srinivas

    hi Srinivas,
    You can create 3 Stages, 1st stage will be having 1st 5 inspection following skip stages, in case of reject, it will go to 1st stage with 5 inspection again, and then to 2nd stage.
    for continuous inspection it will cycle between 2nd and 3rd stage. May be you will find below helpful.
    stage
    number of inspection
    Max skip
    Next stage
    Rejection
    Next stage
    Normal Inspection
    5
    2
    1
    1
    Skip
    1
    1
    3
    1
    1
    Skip
    1
    1
    2
    1
    1
    Thanks and regards,
    Suraj Kamble

  • Creating Dynamic Routing Rules within mediators

    Hi
    When I check the (huge but apparently not enough) SOA developer's guide. I can't find any reference to dynamic rules within mediators. This feature seems available within jdev11g TP3. But the way to use it isn't straightforward.
    Do you know where I could find some explanation/samples or documentation related to this point pls ?
    ThanX
    Dominique

    Dominique,
    Unfortunately this feature is not quite complete in TP3 so I wouldn't waste too much time trying. We will try to have documentation and samples ready for it in TP4.
    Sorry,
    /Demed

Maybe you are looking for