Dynamic Select Query including Dynamic Tables with For all Entries
Hello everyone,
I need to create a select query which involves using of Dynamic Tables.
Suppose I have a dynamic table <d1> which consist of let say 10 records.
Now i need to make a select query putting data into another dynamic table <d2>
CONCATENATE keyfield '=' '<d1>' INTO g_condition SEPARATED BY space.
CONCATENATE g_condition '-' keyfield INTO g_condition.
SELECT * FROM (wa_all_tables-name) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <d1>
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN <d1>
WHERE (g_condition).
But it is giving dump.
Please help me on this....
Short text
A condition specified at runtime has an unexpected format.
What happened?
Error in the ABAP Application Program
The current ABAP program "ZNG_CUSTOMWRITE" had to be terminated because it has
come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
Error analysis
An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYNAMIC_OSQL_SEMANTICS', was
not caught in
procedure "WRITE_ARCHIVE_PROD" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING
clause.
Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
The reason for the exception is:
The current ABAP program has tried to execute an Open SQL statement
which contains a WHERE, ON or HAVING condition with a dynamic part.
The part of the WHERE, ON or HAVING condition specified at runtime in
a field or an internal table, contains the invalid value "ZCOURIER-ZCOURIERID".
CONCATENATE keyfield '=' g_header INTO g_condition SEPARATED BY space.
CONCATENATE g_condition '-' keyfield INTO g_condition.
SELECT * FROM (wa_all_tables-name) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <dyn_table1>
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN <dyn_table>
WHERE (g_condition).
Similar Messages
-
How to use dynamic internal table with FOR ALL ENTRIES
Hello SDNers,
I am having a dynamic internal table & want to use FOR ALL ENTRIES(FAE) using this dyn. table.
This works fine for me:
IF <lt_tmp> IS NOT INITIAL. "<lt_tmp> is my dyn. internal table
SELECT field1 field2
FROM TABLE ztable
INTO TABLE itab "Itab is a static table
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN <lt_tmp>
WHERE (lv_dynwhere). "lv_dynwhere -> dynamic where clause
ENDIF.
SAP documentation says:
"The logical expression sql_cond of the WHERE condition can be comprised of several logical expressions using AND and OR. However, if FOR ALL ENTRIES is specified, there must be at least one comparison with a column of the internal table itab that can be specified statically or dynamically. "
How do we specify the column of the internal table dynamically ? Can we do something like this:
IF <lt_tmp> IS NOT INITIAL. "<lt_tmp> is my dyn. internal table
SELECT field1 field2
FROM TABLE
INTO TABLE itab "Itab is a static table
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN <lt_tmp>
WHERE key_field1 = (dynamic token for column1 of <lt_tmp>)
key_field2 = (dynamic token for column2 of <lt_tmp>)
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
Let me know if i am not clear about my requirement.
BR,
SuhasHello Thomas,
What i meant was something like this:
WHERE key_field1 = ('<LT_TMP-COL1>') AND
key_field2 = ('<LT_TMP-COL2>')
I am confused by what SAP means with "dynamic representation of internal table columns" in FAE ?
@Rob: I was referring to SAPNW 7.0 documentation & the phrase (release 6.40 & higher) is missing. Anyways fyi i am on ECC5.0 ABAP release 6.40.
@Subhankar: This is what Marcin had proposed in For all entries and dynamic table.
Thanks,
Suhas
Edited by: Suhas Saha on Apr 6, 2010 11:53 AM -
How to use single buffered table with FOR ALL ENTRIES KEYWORD
Hai,
I'm Using TJ02T Database table, It is single buffered table but at the same time I want to use FOR ALL ENTRIES KEYWORD , Please Help me.
Regards,
S.JananiHi,
FOR ALL ENTRIES will not depend on the buffering nature of the table. The single buffered table will only only buffer one record into memory. You can still use the statement to query the values, but it may have performance problems if the data volume is high since the records are not completely buffered into memory, the time will spent in getting data from DB.
Thanks..
Preetham S -
Performance Problems with "For all Entries" and a big internal table
We have big Performance Problems with following Statement:
SELECT * FROM zeedmt_zmon INTO TABLE gt_zmon_help
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_zmon_help
WHERE
status = 'IAI200' AND
logdat IN gs_dat AND
ztrack = gt_zmon_help-ztrack.
In the internal table gt_zmon_help are over 1000000 entries.
Anyone an Idea how to improve the Performance?
Thank you!>
Matthias Weisensel wrote:
> We have big Performance Problems with following Statement:
>
>
SELECT * FROM zeedmt_zmon INTO TABLE gt_zmon_help
> FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_zmon_help
> WHERE
> status = 'IAI200' AND
> logdat IN gs_dat AND
> ztrack = gt_zmon_help-ztrack.
>
> In the internal table gt_zmon_help are over 1000000 entries.
> Anyone an Idea how to improve the Performance?
>
> Thank you!
You can't expect miracles. With over a million entries in your itab any select is going to take a bit of time. Do you really need all these records in the itab? How many records is the select bringing back? I'm assuming that you have got and are using indexes on your ZEEDMT_ZMON table.
In this situation, I'd first of all try to think of another way of running the query and restricting the amount of data, but if this were not possible I'd just run it in the background and accept that it is going to take a long time. -
Problem with FOR ALL ENTRIES IN
This is my simple source code.
TABLES: stpo.
DATA: t_stpo LIKE stpo OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
t_stpo_itm LIKE stpo OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
t_stpo-stlnr = '00000058'.
t_stpo-stlkn = '00000003'.
append t_stpo.
t_stpo-stlnr = '00000058'.
t_stpo-stlkn = '00000007'.
append t_stpo.
SELECT * FROM stpo INTO TABLE t_stpo_itm
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_stpo
WHERE stlnr = t_stpo-stlnr " BOM No.
AND stlkn <> t_stpo-stlkn. " BOM item node number
The output from this source including BOM item node number 00000003, 00000007 but at SQL stlkn <> t_stpo-stlkn doesn't effected.
Could Anyone please tell me why?
Are there something wrong?
Thank you in advance.Hi,
You can also Use ranges for Stlnr and Stlkn fields, instead of int table.
TABLES: stpo.
DATA: begin of t_stpo OCCURS 0.
stlnr like stpo-stlnr,
stlkn like stpo-stlkn,
end of t_stpo.
data t_stpo_itm LIKE stpo OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
t_stpo-stlnr = '00000058'.
t_stpo-stlkn = '00000003'.
append t_stpo.
clear t_stpo.
t_stpo-stlnr = '00000058'.
t_stpo-stlkn = '00000007'.
append t_stpo.
clear t_stpo.
if not t_stpo[] is initial.
SELECT * FROM stpo INTO TABLE t_stpo_itm
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_stpo
WHERE stlnr = t_stpo-stlnr " BOM No.
AND stlkn <> t_stpo-stlkn. " BOM item node number
endif.
or you can simply write a select for STPO like this:
SELECT * FROM stpo INTO TABLE t_stpo_itm
WHERE stlnr = '00000058' " BOM No.
AND ( stlkn <> '00000007' or stlkn <> '00000003' ). " BOM item node number
regards,
Anji -
Join 3 tables using FOR ALL ENTRIES
Hi,
I want to join 3 tables and show their result in a text file delimited by comma.
ITs a download program.Can someone tell me how to how to join the three table using for all entires instead of inner join.please give step by step illustrationHi,
Please check below code which downloads records from 3 tables into excel file.
if you want other file means you can specify other file type in the fm parameter
REPORT zstemp_qty2_ LINE-SIZE 255 .
DATA:it_vbak LIKE vbak OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA:v_file1 LIKE rlgrap-filename.
DATA:v_file2(80) TYPE c.
DATA:it_vbap LIKE vbap OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA:it_mara LIKE mara OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
START-OF-SELECTION.
SELECT * FROM vbak INTO TABLE it_vbak UP TO 100 ROWS.
IF NOT it_vbak[] IS INITIAL.
SELECT * FROM vbap INTO TABLE it_vbap
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_vbak
WHERE vbeln = it_vbak-vbeln.
ENDIF.
LOOP AT it_vbap.
CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT'
EXPORTING
input = it_vbap-matnr
IMPORTING
output = it_vbap-matnr.
MODIFY it_vbap TRANSPORTING matnr.CLEAR it_vbap.
ENDLOOP.
IF NOT it_vbap[] IS INITIAL.
SELECT * FROM mara INTO TABLE it_mara
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_vbap
WHERE matnr = it_vbap-matnr.
ENDIF.
CALL FUNCTION 'F4_FILENAME'
EXPORTING
program_name = sy-cprog
dynpro_number = sy-dynnr
FIELD_NAME = ' '
IMPORTING
file_name = v_file1 .
v_file2 = v_file1.
CALL FUNCTION 'WS_DOWNLOAD'
EXPORTING
BIN_FILESIZE = ' '
CODEPAGE = ' '
filename = v_file2
filetype = 'WK1'
MODE = ' '
WK1_N_FORMAT = ' '
WK1_N_SIZE = ' '
WK1_T_FORMAT = ' '
WK1_T_SIZE = ' '
col_select = '1'
COL_SELECTMASK = ' '
NO_AUTH_CHECK = ' '
IMPORTING
FILELENGTH =
TABLES
data_tab = it_mara
FIELDNAMES =
EXCEPTIONS
FILE_OPEN_ERROR = 1
FILE_WRITE_ERROR = 2
INVALID_FILESIZE = 3
INVALID_TYPE = 4
NO_BATCH = 5
UNKNOWN_ERROR = 6
INVALID_TABLE_WIDTH = 7
GUI_REFUSE_FILETRANSFER = 8
CUSTOMER_ERROR = 9
OTHERS = 10
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
LOOP AT it_mara.
WRITE:/ it_mara-matnr.
ENDLOOP.
Regds
Sivaparvathi
Please reward points if helpful..... -
Dynamic SELECT with FOR ALL ENTRIES IN: take 2
Hello Xperts,
we are now having a bit of new trouble with the following SELECT ... special thanks to Raul and Suhas for their previous contributions.
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
<itab1> TYPE standard table.
ASSIGN ATTR_T_I->* TO <itab1>.
select
FIELD1
FIELD2
from DBTAB1
into CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF table <itab1>
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN <itab1>
where
(condition).
ATTR_T_I is a static attibute of type table containing 10 records where all records have FIELD1 and FIELD2 empty.
The select finds in DBTAB1 entries fulfilling the 'condition' for 8 of the above 10 records in ATTR_T_I.
Hence, after the select 8 of the 10 records in ATTR_T_I have the fields FIELD1 and FIELD2 filled (ie not empty).
So far so good!
BUT: the 2 remaining records (i.e. those without entries in DBTAB1 fullfilling 'condition') have been deleted! Why? This is not what we want nor expected.
Any ideas out there how to fix this?
Thanx!Martin Helmstein wrote:
> Yes, 'condition' contains all the key fields of DBTAB1.
Hi Martin,
It's not the Where condition fields i was talking about. I was referring to the Select fields, you have to SELECT all the keyfields when using FAE. Something like this:
SELECT key1 key2 ... keyn "all the key fields of the table
field1 field2 ... fieldn
FROM table
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF it_data
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN <itab>
WHERE (condition).
You can search in the forums for further details. It has been discussed many a times.
BR,
Suhas -
Dynamic SELECT with FOR ALL ENTRIES IN
Hello Xperts,
we are having a bit of trouble with the following SELECT
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
<itab1> TYPE standard table.
ASSIGN ATTR_T_I->* TO <itab1>.
select
FIELD1
FIELD2
from DBTAB1
into CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF table <itab1>
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN <itab1>
where
FIELD3 = <itab1>-FIELD3 and
FIELD4 = <itab1>-FIELD4
ATTR_T_I is a static attibute of type table.
The syntax check throws the following message:
The specified type has no structure and therefore no component called FIELD3.
Any ideas out there how to solve this issue?
Thanx!Hi Martin,
Change your code like this and try.
DATA: itab2 TYPE TABLE OF string.
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
<itab1> TYPE standard table.
ASSIGN ATTR_T_I->* TO <itab1>.
APPEND 'FIELD3 = <itab1>-FIELD3 and' TO itab2.
APPEND 'FIELD4 = <itab1>-FIELD4' TO itab2.
select
FIELD1
FIELD2
from DBTAB1
into CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF table <itab1>
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN <itab1>
where
(itab2)
Regards,
Rahul Muraleedharan. -
How does select stmt with for all entries uses Indexes
Hello all,
I goes through a number of documents but still confused how does select for all entries uses indexes if fields are not in sequences. i got pretty much the same results if i take like two cases on Hr tables HRP1000 and HRP1001(with for all entries based upon hrp1000). Here is the sequence of index fields on hrp1001 (MANDT, OTYPE, OBJID, PLVAR, RSIGN, RELAT, ISTAT, PRIOX, BEGDA, ENDDA, VARYF, SEQNR). in second case objid field is in sequence as in defined Index but i dont see significant increase in field even though the number of records are around 30000. My question is does it make a differrence to use field sequence (same as in table indexes) in comparison to redundant field sequence (not same as defined in table indexes), secondly how we can ge tto know if table index is used in Select for entries query i tried Explain in ST05 but its not clear if it uses any index at all in hrp1001 read.
here is the sample code i use to get test results.
test case 1
REPORT zdemo_perf_select.
DATA: it_hrp1000 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF hrp1000 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_hrp1001 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF hrp1001 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_hrp1007 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF hrp1007 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0000 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0000 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0001 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0001 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0002 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0002 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0105_10 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0105 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0105_20 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0105 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: t1 TYPE timestampl,
t2 TYPE timestampl,
t3 TYPE timestampl
SELECT * FROM hrp1000 CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO TABLE it_hrp1000 bypassing buffer
WHERE mandt EQ sy-mandt AND
plvar EQ '01' AND
otype EQ 'S'AND
istat EQ '1' AND
begda <= sy-datum AND
endda >= sy-datum AND
langu EQ 'EN'.
GET TIME STAMP FIELD t1.
SELECT * FROM hrp1001 CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO TABLE it_hrp1001 bypassing buffer
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_hrp1000
WHERE mandt EQ sy-mandt AND
otype EQ 'S' AND
* objid EQ it_hrp1000-objid and
plvar EQ '01' AND
rsign EQ 'B' AND
relat EQ '007' AND
istat EQ '1' AND
begda LT sy-datum AND
endda GT sy-datum and
sclas EQ 'C' and
objid EQ it_hrp1000-objid.
* %_hints mssqlnt 'INDEX(HRP1001~0)'.
*delete it_hrp1001 where sclas ne 'C'.
GET TIME STAMP FIELD t2.
t3 = t1 - t2.
WRITE: 'Time taken - ', t3.
test case 2
REPORT zdemo_perf_select.
DATA: it_hrp1000 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF hrp1000 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_hrp1001 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF hrp1001 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_hrp1007 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF hrp1007 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0000 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0000 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0001 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0001 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0002 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0002 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0105_10 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0105 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0105_20 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0105 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: t1 TYPE timestampl,
t2 TYPE timestampl,
t3 TYPE timestampl
SELECT * FROM hrp1000 CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO TABLE it_hrp1000 bypassing buffer
WHERE mandt EQ sy-mandt AND
plvar EQ '01' AND
otype EQ 'S'AND
istat EQ '1' AND
begda <= sy-datum AND
endda >= sy-datum AND
langu EQ 'EN'.
GET TIME STAMP FIELD t1.
SELECT * FROM hrp1001 CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO TABLE it_hrp1001 bypassing buffer
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_hrp1000
WHERE mandt EQ sy-mandt AND
otype EQ 'S' AND
objid EQ it_hrp1000-objid and
plvar EQ '01' AND
rsign EQ 'B' AND
relat EQ '007' AND
istat EQ '1' AND
begda LT sy-datum AND
endda GT sy-datum and
sclas EQ 'C'." and
* objid EQ it_hrp1000-objid.
* %_hints mssqlnt 'INDEX(HRP1001~0)'.
*delete it_hrp1001 where sclas ne 'C'.
GET TIME STAMP FIELD t2.
t3 = t1 - t2.
WRITE: 'Time taken - ', t3.Mani wrote:
Thank you for your answer, its very helpful but i am still nor sure how does parameter rsdb/max_blocking_factor affect records size.
Hi,
The blocking affects the size of the statement and the memory structures for returning the result.
So if your itab has 500 rows and your blocking is 5, the very same statement will be executed 100 times.
Nothing good or bad about this so far.
Assume, your average result for an inlist 5 statement is 25 records with an average size of 109 bytes.
You average result size will be 2725 byte plus overhead which will nearly perfectly fit into two 1500 byte ethernet frames.
Nothing to do in this case.
Assume your average result for an inlist 5 statement is 7 records with an average size of 67 bytes.
You average result size will be ~ 470 byte plus overhead which will only fill 1/3 of a 1500 byte ethernet frame.
In this case, setting the blocking to 12 ... 15 will give you 66% network transfer performance gain,
and reduces the number of calls to the DB by 50%, giving additional benefit.
Now this is an extreme example. The longer the average row length is, the lower will be the average loss in the network.
You have the same effects in memory structures, but on that layer you are fighting single micro seconds instead of
hundreds of these, so in real life it is rarely measurable.
Depending on table-statistics, oracle might decide for short inlists to use a concatanation instead of an inlist.
This is supposed to be more costy, but I never had a case where I could proove a big difference.
Values from 5 to 15 for blocking seem to be ok for me. If you have special statements in customer coding,
it #might# be benefitial to do the mentioned calculations and do some network tracing to see if you can squeeze your
network efficiency by tuning the blocking.
If you have jumbo frames enabled, it might be worth to be analyzed as well.
If you are only on a DB-CI system that is loopback connected to the DB, I doubt there might be a big outcome.
Hope this helps
Volker -
Problem with for all entries in select querry
hi,
Hi,
I am using select queery like this
SELECT version COUNT( * )
from ztbi_default_va4
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE lit_new
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lit_new1
WHERE network = lit_new1-network GROUP BY version.
this is not working showing error as:
The addition "FOR ALL ENTRIES" excludes all aggregate functions with
the exception of "COUNT( * )" as the single element of the SELECT clause.
I am using only count(*) ,not using othes like max,min etc,,,,,,,,,
please suggest any missing in syntax,,,,attach relavant code using count(*) with for all entreis
any help appriciated,,,,,
Thanks in advance,,,,Hi,
Try this -
TYPES: begin of t_data,
version TYPE version,
count type i,
end of t_data.
DATA: i_data TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF t_data,
wa_data TYPE t_data.
DATA: l_version TYPE version,
l_count TYPE i.
SELECT version COUNT( * )
from ztbi_default_va4
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE lit_new
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lit_new1
WHERE network = lit_new1-network.
SORT lit_new.
LOOP AT lit_new INTO lwa_new.
IF lwa_new EQ l_version.
l_count = l_count + 1.
ELSE.
wa_data-version = l_version.
wa_data-count = l_count + 1.
APPEND wa_data TO i_data.
CLEAR: wa_data.
CLEAR: l_count.
ENDIF.
l_version = lwa_new-version.
CLEAR: lwa_new.
I hope this will do.
Make any necessary changes.
Regards,
Harsh Bansal -
Replacing a inner join with for all entries
Hi Team,
In a already developed program I am replacing a inner join with select query follow up with for-all-entris and passing the data to final internal table but in both the case the result should be same then only my replacement will be correct. But my no records in both cases differs. This happening because when i am selecting data from first data base table is 32 lines. then I am doing fo-all-entries moving all the duplicate entries then the no records are four. but in final internal table i am looping the first internal table. So in final internal table the no of records are 32. But in inner join query the records are 16.So please let me know how resolve this issue?
Thanks and REgards
DeepaHi Thomas,
Thanks for ur suggestion.
The solved that in below.
In select query I did not change anything The way I had written the code was correct.
I think many of us know how to write that how to make the performance better in that way.
I made the change when I transfered the to final internal table.
The original Inner join code:
select a~field1 a~field2 a~field3 b~field2 b~field3 b~field4
from dbtab1 as a inner join dbtab2 as b
on a~field1 = b~field1 into it_final where
a~field1 in s_field1. [Field1 in both the table are key field]
Before code:
Sort itab1 by key-fields.
sort itab2 by keyfields.
loop at itab1 into wa1.
move: wa1-field1 to wa_final-field1,
wa1-field2 to wa_final-field2,
wa1-field3 to wa_final-field3.
read table itab2 into wa2 witk key field1 = wa1-field1 binary search.
if sy-subrc = 0.
move : wa2-field2 to wa_final-field4,
wa2-field3 to wa_final-field5,
wa2-field4 to wa_final-field6.
append wa_final to it_final.
endif.
Clear : wa1, wa2, wa_final.
endloop.
In this case if the one key fieild value is not present there in second internal table but its there in first internal table still it will read that row with 2nd internal values having zeroes. Normally what does not happen in inner join case if the key field value will same in both the case ,then that will fetch only those rows.
Changed Code
loop at itab1 into wa1.
read table itab2 into wa2 witk key field1 = wa1-field1 binary search.
if sy-subrc = 0.
move: wa1-field1 to wa_final-field1,
wa1-field2 to wa_final-field2,
wa1-field3 to wa_final-field3.
move : wa2-field2 to wa_final-field4,
wa2-field3 to wa_final-field5,
wa2-field4 to wa_final-field6.
append wa_final to it_final.
endif.
Clear : wa1, wa2, wa_final.
endloop.
In this case the values will read to final internal table if both key field matches.
With Regards
Deepa -
Hi,
SELECT max( VBELN ) VGBEL VGPOS POSNR FKIMG VRKME NTGEW MATNR ARKTX WERKS MVGR3
FROM VBRP
INTO TABLE T_INVIT
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_INVHD
WHERE VBELN = T_INVHD-VBELN
AND SPART = T_INVHD-SPART
AND werks IN swerks
AND mvgr3 IN smvgr3
group by VBELN VGBEL VGPOS POSNR FKIMG VRKME NTGEW MATNR ARKTX WERKS MVGR3.
i want to (max) invoice no against a delivery i.e vgbel but in this query i am getting error that with for all entries only count * is allowed.
regards
FoziaHi Do this way..
IF NOT T_INVHD[] is initial.
LOOP AT T_INVHD
SELECT max( VBELN ) VGBEL VGPOS POSNR FKIMG VRKME NTGEW MATNR ARKTX WERKS MVGR3
FROM VBRP
INTO T_INVIT
WHERE VBELN = T_INVHD-VBELN
AND SPART = T_INVHD-SPART
AND werks IN swerks
AND mvgr3 IN smvgr3
group by VGBEL VGPOS POSNR FKIMG VRKME NTGEW MATNR ARKTX WERKS MVGR3.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
APPEND T_INVIT.
CLEAR T_INVIT
ENDIF.
endselect.
endloop.
endif.
EVEN NO EFFECT ON PERFORMANCE
RGDS
RAJESH -
Hi All,
I have used FOR ALL ENTRIES statement in while selecting data based on some other internal table (to avoid select within loop).
While using FOR ALL ENTRIES, the target table (internal table in which data is getting stored) is getting affected.
The other fields are becoming zero and several rows gets delerted from the internal table after performing select query.
How to avoid this bug?
Kindly help me out....
Regards
Pavanhi after the for all entries statement did you used the read statement .
if not you will not get any data ..check this program..
tables:mara,marc.
data:begin of itab occurs 0,
matnr like mara-matnr,
end of itab.
data:begin of itab1 occurs 0,
matnr like marc-matnr,
werks like marc-werks,
end of itab1.
select matnr
from mara
into corresponding fields of table itab.
if itab is initial.
select matnr
werks
from marc
into table itab1
for all entries in itab
where matnr = itab-matnr.
loop at itab1.
read table itab with key matnr = itab-matnr.
write:/ itab1-matnr,itab1-werks.
endloop.
endif. -
Performance issue in 'Selelect statement with for all entries'
Hi,
The following SELECT statement is taking too much time.
SELECT * FROM /rb04/yc5_mver
INTO TABLE g_it_mver
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN l_it_inva
WHERE matnr EQ l_it_inva-matnr AND
werks EQ l_it_inva-werks AND
indei EQ l_it_inva-indei AND
gjahr IN g_r_gjahr.
Internal table l_it_inva is having too many records.
Is there any way to optimize it.
Regards,
TintuHi Tintu,
check table l_it_inva for initial.
sort internal table l_it_inva with key matnr werks indei gjahr.
delete adjacent duplicates from l_it_inva comparing matnr werks indei gjahr.
Then use following select query.
SELECT * FROM /rb04/yc5_mver
INTO TABLE g_it_mver
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN l_it_inva
WHERE matnr EQ l_it_inva-matnr AND
werks EQ l_it_inva-werks AND
indei EQ l_it_inva-indei AND
gjahr IN g_r_gjahr.
Regards,
Vijay -
Using aggregate function along with for all entries: sugest alternative
My requirement:
For each record in i_vbap for which 'charg' is initial, need to determine batch using the following logic:
For the material (MATNR) in i_vbap, select the batch (CHARG) which has the largest (MAX) unrestricted inventory quantity (CLABS) from MCHB table.
How do I implement this logic without using select statement inside a loop as I cannot use MAX ( CLABS ) function along with FOR ALL ENTRIES in a SELECT?
Suggest an alternative.For each record in i_vbap for which 'charg' is initial ,fetch all the existing 'clabs' value.
[ Remember to include all the key fields in selct ]
Sort the new table .
Put a loop,use at end of 'charg' and append to another table. U get ur solution
I think this should be the most economic way to do so.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Notes app on iPhone crashes during initial scroll
When scrolling in Notes app on iPhone5 I reach a note at which Notes crashes (about 5 notes past the last note on the initial screen). I can open notes okay before this point, and edit, or create new notes. If I use search I can scroll through hundr
-
How to create ringingtone into my iPhone using macbook?
pls teach me how to create ringingtone into my iphone using macbook...
-
10.4.9 ppc won't install through Software Update
Tried to use SW Update to update to 10.4.9. It downloaded OK, but then came up with the following message: "This update "Mac OS X Update (PowerPC)" can't be installed "The digital signature for this package is incorrect. "The package may have been ta
-
I have newly installed Firefox 4 on my computer as part of re-installing my OS. Firefox now opens with 2 tabs: my specified home tab and, to its right, a Firefox Support Home Page tab. I suppose I did something to cause this, but how can I undo it?
-
How do I get ADOBE on my i mac - in fact, CAN I get ADOBE is probably the best way to ask the question. I cannot download some information becasue I haven't got this programme.