E 72 Product code doesnot match with the phone mod...

I am using E 72-1 with a product code of 057019 .But when I search for an updated softwarewith the product code , I see the model as E 71 .
Kindly tell me what exactly is the issue .
Regards
Amith

Had you said 0570192 to start with it would have saved time...
0570192 is indeed the product code of an Australian Vodafone branded E71.
Somehow it looks like you've been sold an E71 with the firmware of an E72 flashed into it. Can you send us a photo of your phone? An E72 (black variant, there are other colours) should look like this:
Was this post helpful? If so, please click on the white "Kudos!" star below. Thank you!

Similar Messages

I'm trying to upload the new itunes version because The older one doesnt match with the iphone 5. At one step it is required one code to allow the installation but as It is not the itunes code which one is it ?

I'm trying to upload the new itunes version because The older one doesnt match with the iphone 5. At one step it is required one code to allow the installation but as It is not the itunes code which one is it ?

Hello, GwladysPa.
Thank you for visiting Apple Support Communities.
I believe that the iTunes update is requesting your computer's administrator password to update the application. Here is the article that explains this process.
Mac OS X: Software installations require administrator password
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2558
Cheers,
Jason H.

The number of details is not matching with the total count.

Hi all, again stuck with the code.
There is a form where i have to populate all the details of few tables in excel & there is a report where i have to make count of all these details.
The problem here is the number of details that is populated in excel is not matching with the count in report, both have to match. There some problem in code, please help me in matching it.
The below is the 5 tables with the columns below.
Tables are ENQACEDTL, ENQACEHDR, ENQACMDTL, ENQACMHDR, ENQACSPEC:
The Names mentioned below the table's name are Column Names:
ENQACEDTL
ENQACEHDR
ENQACMDTL
ENQACMHDR
ENQACSPEC
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENQAMDNO
ENGREF
ENGREF
QTY
OFFREF
MINSL
ITEM
EPREPBY
ITEM
BRANCH
EINSL
FRAME
DEPT
RATING
DEPT
MTEMP
TECOLD
ENGREFTDT
ENCLIP
MKTREF
ETEMP
THE BELOW IS THE SELECT STATEMENT CODE FOR POPULATING DATA IN EXCEL:
SELECT ENQACEDTL.ENQNO, ENQACEDTL.ENQAMDNO, ......... (....ALL COLUMNS)
FROM ENQACMHDR,ENQACMDTL,ENQACEHDR,ENQACEDTL,ENQACSPEC
WHERE
ENQACMHDR.ENQNO=ENQACMDTL.ENQNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACEHDR.ENQNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQNO AND
ENQACEHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACSPEC.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACMDTL.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQNO=ENQACEHDR.ENQNO AND
ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO=ENQACEHDR.ENQAMDNO AND
ENQACEHDR.ENGREF=ENQACEDTL.ENGREF AND
ENQACMDTL.ITEM=ENQACEDTL.ITEM AND
ENQACMHDR.DEPT=:PROC_DEPT AND
ENQACEHDR.ENGREFDT BETWEEN :FROMDATE AND :TODATE
ORDER BY ENQACMHDR.ENQNO,ENQACMHDR.ENQAMDNO;
THE BELOW IS THE SELECT STATEMENT CODE FOR COUNT OF DETAILS IN REPORT:
SELECT ALL ACENQ.ENQACEHDR.DEPT, COUNT(ACENQ.ENQACEHDR.ENQNO) COUNT
FROM ACENQ.ENQACEDTL, ACENQ.ENQACEHDR
WHERE (ACENQ.ENQACEDTL.ENGREF=ACENQ.ENQACEHDR.ENGREF)
AND ENQACEHDR.LOCKE=1 AND
ENQACEHDR.ENGREFDT BETWEEN :P_STDATE AND :P_ENDDATE
GROUP BY ENQACEHDR.DEPT;
There is problem in join condition of 1st code that is in the "SELECT STATEMENT CODE FOR POPULATING DATA IN EXCEL":
Please help me to sort out this problem..
Thank You.
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
Oracle Forms & Reports Builder 6i.

As Karthick points out, we cannot help if we cannot see your correct table structures (create table statements) and some example data and expected output (insert statements would be helpful). You're telling us there's a problem, but we cannot see what the problem is as you've not shown it. Just saying your query is not working is like me telling you my car is not working, but not telling you what the symptoms are. You wouldn't know where to start in fixing it.
Why are you using Oracle 9.2.0.1 ? Not only has that version been unsupported for about a decade, but 9.2.0.7 was the first version of 9i that was considered 'stable' as versions prior to that were considered buggy. So you're using an old, unsupported and buggy version of oracle. Seriously, you need to consider upgrading to a supported version, preferably at least the latest 11g version.
And what has oracle Forms and Reports got to do with the issue?
And please explain how you are getting your data out of Excel and presenting it to Oracle to be able to query against it. Excel does not have "tables", so your question is completely unclear how you are querying the data from Excel.

Genius says my numbers don't match and the phone has been tampered with. Can anybody help?

I have an iPhone4S 64Gb, which I bought from the Apple Store in Covent Garden in December 2011. Recently it developed a problem where it won't shut down (it restarts itself) and the battery life has deteriorated significantly. Having read about this in this Forum, this seems to be a known issue, and a replacement is needed.
Sure enough, the Genius Bar at Covent Garden took one look at it and wanted to replace it. But then there was a problem. Apparently, one of the serial numbers on the phone (the chassis) does not match the ones on sim tray and software. The Genius (Barry) and his manager (Adam) both said that this could only be a result of tampering or non-Apple servicing. They say the chassis part comes from a batch which originated in Bulgaria.
What??!!
My phone has not been touched by anybody but me since I bought it in December. There's no way I would let a non-authorised dealer touch it - I know full well that it would void the warranty, wouldn't trust it, and anyway I've always had a really good Genius Bar experience. More importantly, it's been fine - no need.
So, what then? Their hypothesis is that somebody has tampered with my phone without my knowledge. As is probably true for many iPhone users, my phone is not far behind my wedding tackle in the extent to which I am attached to it, indeed it spends a lot more time in my hand and line of sight. The idea that somebody could have had access to my phone for long enough to have opened it up and resealed it, having changed parts, without my knowing, is completely absurd. I just don't believe it.
And why would they? If you're going to steal a phone, then steal it. Barry's theory is that some people steal legitimate serial numbers in order to qualify for Apple servicing. Really? Wouldn't they still have a phone with mismatched serial numbers that Apple then wouldn't touch? It seems utterly far-fetched.
In short, I have no idea how Apple managed to supply me with what appears to be a dodgy handset. Supply chain failure, admin failure, I don't know. I know that it hasn't been 'serviced' by anybody, but I can tell that Barry and Adam don't believe me. They believe that the fact of mismatched serial numbers are incontrovertible evidence of tampering. (I'm minded to point out that they opened up the phone out of my sight, hence becoming the only people with the opportunity - and expertise - to do exactly what they're alleging has been done).
The issue is now with Corporate Customer Servcies. I'm not hugely optimistic.
Has anybody out there experienced anything similar? Can anybody offer any theories (preferably without straying into corporate conspiracy fantasies) as to how the numbers may have become mismatched?
Grateful for any help.

I'm still in "recovery mode" after a huge fight with our local Applestore.
About 6 weeks ago, my wife's 13 month old iPhone 4S developed the "won't turn off" fault and was replaced, out of warranty, for a fee of £139 and with a 90 day warranty.
About two weeks after that we realised that there was a sound problem when trying to use Facetime (the person on the other end couldn't hear us) but as we have ipads in the household, we didn't immediately persue it and assumed it was down to some setting problem.
Two weeks ago my wife was shooting some video with the phone, something we hadn't done before and on playback there was no sound. We realised then that the phone probably had hardware issues and arranged to take it back to the store for repair or replacement.
I wasn't anticipating any problem when they said that it was a hardware issue and assumed that a replacement would be supplied.
They looked inside an found that a dozen screws were missing and all the EM shielding that's normally screwed in place was also missing. On this basis, they refused to repair or replace. Things got a little tense after that.
I KNOW that we didn't remove any parts. I find it impossible to believe that even if a third party had obtained access to my wife's phone, that they would have opened the phone, removed the screws and EM screens (including the one that has the QR code serial number), put it back together and then returned it to its original position.
As I repeated ad nauseum to the manager of the store, the only possible other option was that the phone was supplied in that condition. After an hour and a half of arguing, sometimes quite loudly and refusing to leave the store until they replaced the handset, they caved in.
I don't believe that Apple quality control is 100% accurate. In fact I'm sure that no manufacturer's QC is. How our handset slipped through the net I don't know but it did.
I don't know whether this story will help you in any way but I hope you get your problem resolved

Fetch the netprice from the validity period which always matches with the

Let me describe the same.
Suppose the PO creation date is 04.07.2007
The conditions for an item in a contract for the PO are as follows;
1. Validity from 04.07.2007 validity to 04.07.2007 Netprice = 100.00
2. Validity from 05.07.2007 validity to 31.12.9999 Netprice = 200.00
We need to always fetch the netprice from the validity period which always matches with the PO creation date. here the value 100.00 should be the correct netpr as the PO creation date matches with the first validity period.
But the program is fetching the netprice 200.000 which belongs to the second validity period. That is beacuse the select statement which fetches the data for contracts collects on the basis of EKKO-kdate and ekko-kdtab.the fields kdate and kdtab retrieves the validity period of the contract which is from 04.07.2007 to 31.072007. This data is then used to retrieve the netpr data from EKPO and it fetched 200.00 as it retrives the netprice of current data in contract validity and h not with respect to PO creation date.
This data is then used to fetch the get the netpr data from EKPO.
what we need is the netprice for that validity period of item(Conditions) that matches with the PO creation date..
Below is the code where I'm selecting the data from ekko and ekpo for the contracts data..Can you please add the code snippet to the below attachesd subroutine to get the required data from KONV and KONP so that we can retrieve the correct Netprice.
FORM select_contracts USING p_s_cebeln LIKE s_cebeln[]
p_c_k_bstyp TYPE ebstyp
p_p_bukrs TYPE bukrs
p_p_ekorg TYPE ekorg
p_p_ekgrp TYPE bkgrp
*Begin of Mod-004
fp_p_cernam type ty_r_ernam
p_p_cernam TYPE ernam
*End of Mod-004
p_s_werks LIKE s_werks[]
p_s_matnr LIKE s_matnr[]
p_s_lifnr LIKE s_lifnr[]
p_s_val_dt LIKE s_val_dt[].
*mod-002
data : l_amount type BAPICURR_D, " Net price
l_waers TYPE waers, " Currency Key
l_eff_amount type BAPICURR_D. " Effective value
data: l_v_netpr type bprei.
*mod-002
SELECT ebeln
bukrs
bstyp
aedat
ernam
lifnr
zterm
ekorg
ekgrp
waers
wkurs
kdatb
kdate
inco1
INTO TABLE i_ekko
FROM ekko
WHERE ebeln IN p_s_cebeln
AND bstyp EQ p_c_k_bstyp
AND bukrs EQ p_p_bukrs
AND ekorg EQ p_p_ekorg
AND ekgrp EQ p_p_ekgrp
*Begin of Mod-004
AND ernam EQ p_p_cernam
AND ernam IN fp_p_cernam
*End of Mod-004
AND lifnr IN p_s_lifnr
AND ( kdatb IN p_s_val_dt OR kdate IN p_s_val_dt ).
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
Populates internal table i_ekpo using EKPO table.
SELECT ebeln
ebelp
loekz
txz01
matnr
werks
ktmng
menge
meins
bprme
netpr
peinh
webaz
mwskz
uebto
untto
erekz
pstyp
knttp
repos
webre
konnr
ktpnr
ean11
effwr
xersy
aedat
prdat
INTO TABLE i_ekpo
FROM ekpo
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_ekko
WHERE ebeln = i_ekko-ebeln
and aedat = i_ekko-aedat
AND werks IN p_s_werks
AND matnr IN p_s_matnr.
LOOP AT i_ekpo INTO rec_ekpo.
MOVE rec_ekpo-ebeln TO rec_contr-ebeln.
MOVE rec_ekpo-ebelp TO rec_contr-ebelp.
MOVE rec_ekpo-loekz TO rec_contr-loekz.
MOVE rec_ekpo-txz01 TO rec_contr-txz01.
MOVE rec_ekpo-matnr TO rec_contr-matnr.
MOVE rec_ekpo-werks TO rec_contr-werks.
MOVE rec_ekpo-ktmng TO rec_contr-ktmng.
MOVE rec_ekpo-menge TO rec_contr-menge.
MOVE rec_ekpo-meins TO rec_contr-meins.
MOVE rec_ekpo-bprme TO rec_contr-bprme.
MOVE rec_ekpo-netpr TO rec_contr-netpr.
move l_v_netpr TO rec_contr-netpr.
mod-002
read table i_ekko into rec_ekko with key
ebeln = rec_ekpo-ebeln.
l_waers = rec_ekko-waers.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_CURRENCY_CONV_TO_EXTERNAL'
EXPORTING
currency = l_waers
amount_internal = rec_contr-netpr
IMPORTING
AMOUNT_EXTERNAL = l_amount.
rec_contr-netpr = l_amount.
mod-002
MOVE rec_ekpo-peinh TO rec_contr-peinh.
MOVE rec_ekpo-webaz TO rec_contr-webaz.
MOVE rec_ekpo-mwskz TO rec_contr-mwskz.
MOVE rec_ekpo-uebto TO rec_contr-uebto.
MOVE rec_ekpo-untto TO rec_contr-untto.
MOVE rec_ekpo-erekz TO rec_contr-erekz.
MOVE rec_ekpo-pstyp TO rec_contr-pstyp.
MOVE rec_ekpo-knttp TO rec_contr-knttp.
MOVE rec_ekpo-repos TO rec_contr-repos.
MOVE rec_ekpo-webre TO rec_contr-webre.
MOVE rec_ekpo-konnr TO rec_contr-konnr.
MOVE rec_ekpo-ktpnr TO rec_contr-ktpnr.
MOVE rec_ekpo-ean11 TO rec_contr-ean11.
MOVE rec_ekpo-effwr TO rec_contr-effwr.
mod-002
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_CURRENCY_CONV_TO_EXTERNAL'
EXPORTING
currency = l_waers
amount_internal = rec_contr-effwr
IMPORTING
AMOUNT_EXTERNAL = l_eff_amount.
rec_contr-effwr = l_eff_amount.
*mod-002
MOVE rec_ekpo-xersy TO rec_contr-xersy.
APPEND rec_contr TO i_contr.
CLEAR: rec_ekpo,rec_contr.
mod-002
CLEAR : rec_ekko,l_amount, l_eff_amount,l_waers.
mod-002
ENDLOOP.
Modifying i_contr using i_ekko.
SORT i_ekko BY ebeln.
LOOP AT i_contr INTO rec_contr.
READ TABLE i_ekko INTO rec_ekko WITH KEY
ebeln = rec_contr-ebeln
BINARY SEARCH.
MOVE rec_ekko-bukrs TO rec_contr-bukrs.
MOVE rec_ekko-bstyp TO rec_contr-bstyp.
MOVE rec_ekko-aedat TO rec_contr-aedat.
MOVE rec_ekko-ernam TO rec_contr-ernam.
MOVE rec_ekko-lifnr TO rec_contr-lifnr.
MOVE rec_ekko-zterm TO rec_contr-zterm.
MOVE rec_ekko-ekorg TO rec_contr-ekorg.
MOVE rec_ekko-ekgrp TO rec_contr-ekgrp.
MOVE rec_ekko-waers TO rec_contr-waers.
MOVE rec_ekko-wkurs TO rec_contr-wkurs.
MOVE rec_ekko-kdatb TO rec_contr-kdatb.
MOVE rec_ekko-kdate TO rec_contr-kdate.
MOVE rec_ekko-inco1 TO rec_contr-inco1.
MODIFY i_contr FROM rec_contr.
ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
REFRESH: i_ekko,
i_ekpo.
CLEAR : rec_ekko,
rec_ekpo,
rec_contr.
ENDFORM. "select_contracts
Thanks.

Hi,
Please get the valid condition ( based on date ) from A016 (MK & LPA). With the appropriate KNUMH read the Condition header. You can access the different condition items viz., PB00, RA00 etc., for the values from table KONP. Further if you have Value scales / Quantity scales, you can read the data from KONM, KONW.
An additional tips: in KONP, if you have a condition like RA00 - Rebate, the value will be multiplied by 10 and saven in database to accomodate the discount to the third decimal.
I could not completely understand your requirements like nature of development ( Is it a Report / SAP Script ??) you are working etc., so that I could help you precisely.
Hope this helps,
Best Regards, Murugesh AS
Message was edited by:
Murugesh Arcot

Accounting doc entries not matching with the the entries from j_1ipart2 entries

Hi,
After creating PO, I have done MIGO and J1IEX. Now, posted MIRO. The end screen shows a number stating accounting document created.
I checked the accounting doc in fb03 and the document is displayed over there. I also checked the table for values captured in PART2 of excise. The value displayed in table is not matching with the value displayed in accounting document. Can anyone help?

Hello Tejas,
Here is the updated version of the situation.
After the transaction J1IEX, I got a message saying an 'Accounting Document' has been created. But the accounting document number does not match with the original values. I checked all the tables and found out that the accounting document is not created.
In this case, I thought of creating an accounting document manually and adding them directly to the table.
Here are my questions,
-Can I manually create an accounting document for multiple line items?
-Few tax values should be split and should go to 2 different GL accounts. so how to do this if I am creating it manually
-Or can I delete the values captured during 'J1IEX' in the table and reopen the GR so that the t-code j1iex can be processed again?

SAP format is not matching with the bank format

Hello,
I have created an invoice for a specific vendor and run the transaction F110 ,created a proposal and carried out a payment run.
Later when I go to Environment --> Payment Medium --> DME Administration and choose one item and try to display it, the data
medium contents are being displayed correctly.But the displayed Data medium contents are not matching with the bank format
for which the payment transaction has been made.
Would request you to suggest the changes to be made either in DME or the corresponding ABAP code for making the Data
medium contents match with the bank format.
Regards,
Vineela.
Edited by: Vineela S on Jul 27, 2011 8:24 PM

Hi Kumar,
There could be three reasons.
1. You may have more than one recon accounts for different vendor groups. So, you need to select all the GL accounts when reconcile with Vendor balances.
2. You may have some special GL transactions, which may post to different reconciliation accounts. Please check Special GL transactions (Down payments so on)
3. Your vendor recon accounts may be changed after some postings. Please check. If changed, you need to select these GLs also for reconciliation with vendor balances.
Hope this will help you. If not clear please reply, I will explain you.
Pl. assign points if useful.
Thanks

Setup.exe gives a "LANG_LIST has some locales which does not match with the locale of serial number"

I ran the Adobe Customization Wizard XI to create a transform file and now when run setup.exe it always come with the error "LANG_LIST has some locales which does not match with the locale of serial number".
It does the same thing when using msi with the command : msiexec /i AcroPro.msi TRANSFORMS=AcroPro.mst /qb!
Here is my setup.ini file
[Startup]
RequireOS=Windows XP
RequireMSI=3.1
RequireIE=7.0.0000.0
Require64BitVC10RT=1
CmdLine=/spb /rs /sl"1036"
[Product]
msi=AcroPro.msi
vcrtMsi=vc_red.msi
vcrtDir=VC10RT_x64
Languages=1033;1036
2052=Chinese Simplified
1028=Chinese Traditional
1029=Czech
1030=Danish
1043=Dutch (Netherlands)
1033=English (United States)
1035=Finnish
1036=French (France)
1031=German (Germany)
1038=Hungarian
1040=Italian (Italy)
1041=Japanese
1042=Korean
1044=Norwegian (Bokmal)
1045=Polish
1046=Portuguese (Brazil)
1049=Russian
1051=Slovak
1060=Slovenian
1034=Spanish (Traditional Sort)
1053=Swedish
1055=Turkish
1058=Ukrainian
1025=English with Arabic support
1037=English with Hebrew support
6156=French (Morocco)
CmdLine=TRANSFORMS="AcroPro.mst"
[Windows XP]
PlatformID=2
MajorVersion=5
MinorVersion=1
ServicePackMajor=3
[MSI Updater]
Path=WindowsInstaller-KB893803-v2-x86.exe
I don't know what goes wrong as took my serial number on my profile from the adobe web site, same thing for the download of the software.
Does it means that the serial number provided was invalid for deploying ?
NB.: My goal is to deploy our Acrobat XI through SCCM in silent mode and I don't know if there is extra consideration for that. For now it's only not working at the command line.
Another important point is that the install works great without customization ! If I just run the setup.exe from freshly extracted files and I use my serial number, everything is working fine.
So what goes wrong ?

Thanks for the reply brogers_1 and Vinod Dbhal, you gave good hint.
I retried installing the initial package in French on a Windows 7 English and the software installed properly in French.
As I used to work with virtuals for those tests, I rolled back my virtual and redo my test installation with chosing to install it in English on my Windows 7 English and again the installation finished properly but I was surprised when I realized that even if I chose English as language, the software was running in French !
Of course I can change the language settings (in the edit-preferences-language) to follow the operating system witch is nice.
That gave me the cue I needed to know. I started from scratch my customization with choosing only the French language in the "Application Languages" and I left the MUI Languages blank and saved the .mst
I ran again the same command : msiexec /i AcroPro.msi TRANSFORMS=AcroPro.mst /qb!
And everything works fine.
NB.: As I used the .msi directly, of course I had to install the prerequirement Visual C++ 2010 first. Otherwise the installation failed without any error message.
Thanks again to you for your good hint,
Bob

[svn:osmf:] 11239: Updated DRM MediaError codes to work with the the Framework strings class.

Revision: 11239
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-10-28 13:03:06 -0700 (Wed, 28 Oct 2009)
Log Message:
Updated DRM MediaError codes to work with the the Framework strings class. DRM errors spit directly from the VideoElement.
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFramework/org/osmf/events/MediaErrorCodes.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFramework/org/osmf/utils/MediaFrameworkStrings.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFramework/org/osmf/video/VideoElement.as

check the server log;
/app/oracle/product/fwm11g/user_projects/domains/fwm_domain/servers/AdminServer/logs/AdminServer.log
you can launch the console and see if it is running; http://<server>:<port>/console

A PO has posted,goods r received but the invoice is not matching with the..

hi
A PO has posted,goods r received but the invoice is not matching with the PO as the TAX was reduced after posting. PLz clarify
can some explain the issue plz

Hi,
1. You are talking about which tax (Is it Excise Duty + CST/VAT) if yes then you can post the Excise invoice with correct duty amount in J1IEX and then same will get defaulted in MIRO as per the duty posted in Excise Invoice not as per PO.
If you have already posted the excise invoice then go for cancellation of same in J1IEX and then cancel GR and Post excise invoice to reverse Part 2 entries and then again do GR and Post Excise invoice with correct amount and then do LIV.
2. If it is only CST / VAT then simply use the appropriate tax code in MIRO as per the revised tax rate.
For e.g. if in PO Tax code is 4% VAT and now if you get invoice of say 1% VAT from vendor then simply select the tax code of 1% VAT in MIRO similarly can be done in case of CST and Service Tax also. Only in case of Excise duty you have to follow the above method.

WCF WSDL shoud match with the JAVA WSDL

Hi All,
I have a requirement where I have the JAVA WSDL which was successfully ported to .net 4.5 as server interface. While I try to run the services by implementing the interface the WSDL output from .net doesnt match with the java wsdl.
Can somebody say whether its possible? or is there any work around for this.
For example
Java WSDL
<message name="submit">
But .NET WSDL
<wsdl:message name="ISubmitServiceSoap_submit_OutputMessage">
thanks,

It is not possible.
WCF WSDL and JAVA WSDL has his own rule for the services, so they shoule be hard for match. But we can use the svcutil.exe(https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa347733(v=vs.110).aspx)
to generate proxy code and config file.

The value in flexfield context reference web bean does not match with the value in the context of the Descriptive flexfield web bean BranchDescFlex. If this in not intended, please go back to correct the data or contact your Systems Administrator for assi

Hi ,
We have enabled context sensitive DFF in Bank Branch Page for HZ_PARTIES DFF , We have created Flex Map so that only bank branch context fields are only displayed in the bank branch page and as we know party information DFF is shared by supplier and Customer Page so we dint want to see any Bank Branch fields or context information in those pages.
We have achieved the requirement but when open existing branches bank branch update is throwing below error message :
"The value in flexfield context reference web bean does not match with the value in the context of the Descriptive flexfield web bean BranchDescFlex. If this in not intended, please go back to correct the data or contact your Systems Administrator for assistance."
this error is thrown only when we open existing branches, if we save existing branch and open then it is not throwing any error message.
Please let us know reason behind this error message.
Thanks,
Mruduala

You are kidding? It took me about 3 minutes to scroll down on my tab to get to the triplex button!
Habe you read the error message?
Quote:
java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-04098: trigger 'PMS.PROJECT_SEQ' is invalid and failed re-validation
Check the trigger and it should work again.
Timo

GL account balance not matching with the total stock value

Hi,
The GL account balance is not matching with the total stock value in report RM07MBSTfor stock in transit, Can anyone please let me know, where should, I look into to verify the reason for difference.
Quick response will be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards

I am able to solve this issue. My client has a customized report, which helped me to look into the details of stock in tranisit account. Stock in transit account actually include PPV and TPV alongwith standard cost.

The creditors report is not matching with the G/L account

Hi Gurus,
The creditors report is not matching with the G/L account ,where i can go and find out the differences ?
Please give me advice,
I will assign points
Thanks&Regards,
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
There could be three reasons.
1. You may have more than one recon accounts for different vendor groups. So, you need to select all the GL accounts when reconcile with Vendor balances.
2. You may have some special GL transactions, which may post to different reconciliation accounts. Please check Special GL transactions (Down payments so on)
3. Your vendor recon accounts may be changed after some postings. Please check. If changed, you need to select these GLs also for reconciliation with vendor balances.
Hope this will help you. If not clear please reply, I will explain you.
Pl. assign points if useful.
Thanks

Balance in vendor recon account is not matching with the balance in subsida

Dear All
Balance in vendor recon account is not matching with the balance in subsidary ledger, the recons accounts inthe masters have been changed,how do i reconcile them

Hi Surya,
check f101 - tab parameter, flag Change recon acct.
f101 carries out postings or gives you a simple list to determine all the open items with changed recon accounts.
Best regards
Horst
Edited by: HorstRn on Jun 24, 2008 6:22 PM
By the way.... this is the AM forum... Chance to get a solution is much higher in financials....

E 72 Product code doesnot match with the phone mod...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for