E-mail integration configuration

When I go to the "E-mail Inbox" workcenter in the webui, and click "Transfer to CRM" of an e-mail I get the following alert message:
"SAP CRM solution cannot access Microsoft Outlook
Apllication was stoppen"
A hint on where to configure or resolve this would be very much appreciated

Hi,
You have to install the Collaboration Data Object in your computer, you can find on this link:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=2714320D-C997-4DE1-986F-24F081725D36&displaylang=en

Similar Messages

ERROR: Cannot start mail services, configuration directory does not exist

I'm running an Xserve G5 with one internal boot drive and one RAID using the other two internal drives. I used Apple's Disk Utility to set-up the RAID.
Back in early December, I moved my mail database and mail store to the RAID. Ever since, when I restart the server, the mailaccess.log generates the following error:
Jan 23 18:51:33 mail master[47]: ERROR: Cannot start mail services, configuration directory does not exist: /Volumes/RAID/mail.data/db
I'm speculating this is a timing error that gets created when Postfix initially can't find the RAID. Then, it must try again and find it because the error message does not repeat and mail starts running.
Is this something to worry about?

Hi Joel,
You're right, it's a timing issues. The mail system is ready for work before the file system is mounted. It's benign.
Jeff

Error during sync integrated configuration - incoming payload missed

Hi guys,
we are suing PI 7.11 and trying to use the new feature integrated configuration wherever possible.
Now I test a sync szeanrio where sender is SOAP and receiver is RFC.
The messages fails in SOAP Sender channel with the error that there is no suitable receiver found for this message.
During integrated configuration content based routing is used.
com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: Receiver Determination failed for message e54dba61-9ded-11de-801a-020000000038(OUTBOUND)
But the message fails without persisting the payload, so I could check what value is missing in the receiver rules.
Furthermore the message is only displayed in the sender chanel and is not shown in rwb
While using the normal way of messsage processing where the integration server is involved, such errors are persisted and the payload is also available.
Is that the normal behaviour of integrated configurations.
Could the behaviour be parametrized?
Any help appreciated
Kind regards
Jochen

Hi,
thanks for helping.
Because of integrated configuration the integration server is passed and there is no entry in sxmb_moni.
I already tried this blog, but it doesn´t work for me.
I changed the parameter according to the blog.
But the message content of sync messages are stilled deleted.
Does the parameter changed requires restart of adapter engine or complete java stack?
There two templates one called 'Usage_Type_all_in_One' and above there is an node named equal to the server node name. The parameter of which template have to be changed.
I tried both with out success.
Hopefully you could help me using this feature
Kind regards
Jochen

The user or users have been added successfully, but there was an error in sending the e-mail message. The server may not be set up correctly to send e-mail. To verify that e-mail is configured correctly, contact your server administrator

I got this problem when I tried to configure out-going email and add an account to farm administrator group.
I configure out-going email according to this website http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc288949.aspx
Here are the screen shots.
The SMTP server and email accounts work out OK when I use Outlook 2010 to test.
Anyone can help me about it? Thanks.
Here is the log.
09/20/2012 09:21:00.36 w3wp.exe (0x1F7C)
0x1138
SharePoint Foundation E-Mail
8gsf
High
#160008: The e-mail address 'admin3.sharepoint@domain' contains illegal
characters. df98555c-612f-4a58-9443-ab6e9a4fcc53
09/20/2012 09:21:00.36 w3wp.exe (0x1F7C)
0x1138
SharePoint Foundation General
8kh7 High
Cannot complete this action. Please try again.
df98555c-612f-4a58-9443-ab6e9a4fcc53
09/20/2012 09:21:00.36 w3wp.exe (0x1F7C)
0x1138
SharePoint Foundation E-Mail
7946 Critical
Cannot complete this action. Please try again.
df98555c-612f-4a58-9443-ab6e9a4fcc53
09/20/2012 09:21:00.36 w3wp.exe (0x1F7C)
0x1138
SharePoint Foundation Runtime
tkau Unexpected
Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The user or users have been added successfully, but there was an error in sending the e-mail message. The server may not be set up correctly to send e-mail. To verify that e-mail is configured correctly, contact your
server administrator. at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.AclInv.SendEmailInvitation(EntityEditor picker, String subject, String message) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.AclInv.BtnOK_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e)
at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.OnClick(EventArgs e) at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) at System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(IPostBackEventHandler sourceControl, String
eventArgument) at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStage...
df98555c-612f-4a58-9443-ab6e9a4fcc53
The e-mail address I have tested it for several times and there is no problem.
Anyone has any clue about this error?

Hi.
This I have seen before...
It can be that the SMTP relay server is configured to only allow certain IP ranges or addresses.
It can be that the firewall on the SP server does not allow for SMTP traffic (normally 25, for example for Exchange).
It can be that there is an Antivirus on the SP server(Client AV) that prohobits the Timer service to send email from this server. I have seen MacAfee do this. Needed an policy change.
If, its the builtin SMTP service you are using, check this link:
http://blog.sharepointrx.com/2010/11/18/setting-up-the-iis-smtp-server-for-sending-email-from-sharepoint-2010-on-server-2008-r2/
Check that and try again.
Regards
Thomas Balkeståhl - Technical Specialist - SharePoint -
http://blog.blksthl.com
Download the SharePoint Branding Project here
Download the SharePoint 2010 Site Settings Explained here

Integrated Configuration- Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender

Hi , I am using AAE in PI 7.1 and it is proxy to file scenrios.
When Ia m doing testing in Integration Directory in test configuration its giving me this error .
Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender -<ECCBUSINESSSYSTEM> to receiver -BS_D_EPS,http://abc.com/sap/pi/HR/Qualifications.Qualifications_Async_Out: No receiver agreement found for , -<ECCBUSINESSSYSTEM> , BS_D_EPS, http://abc.com/sap/pi/HR/Qualifications, Qualifications_Async_Out
( here it should take interface Qualifications_Async_In, but logs says it is pointing to outbound interface)
here when I am going in to trace logs then it seems that are not able to understand the receiver interface . rather then it is taking sender inface in logs..
In trace logs . I am getting
Receiver Determination
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Start with given receiver - BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Using Receiver Determination 00000000000000000000000000000000 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No Relation found - accept given Receivers. </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...extracting Receiver from Header: BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Classic Receiver Determination via Rules. </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">...create rule engine </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">No Receiver found behaviour: 0 </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of Receivers:1 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
Interface Determination
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">...There is no Interface Determination configured for receiver party and receiver service BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) BS_D_EPS Qualifications_Async_Out </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...valid InbIf without Condition: Qualifications_Async_Out </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of receiving Interfaces:1 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
Operation Mapping
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......attachment XI_Context not found </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping already defined in interface determination </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No mapping configured </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
I have developed the other integrated configuration scenario and this is working fine .
please let me know how can I troubleshoot it

I am using sender as Soap and receiver as File adapter.
here the problem is that while going for interface deteremination and receiver agreement it is calling to Outbound interface .
It should call the inbound interface. I put all the details correctly and deleted all the objects and crated again for both Ir and Id..
I put the name of inbound interface in configuration but while executing its calling outbound interface.

ABAP Proxy sender possible in integrated configuration AAE with PI 7.11

Hi guys,
we are running PI 7.11.
We have serveral scenarios where the senderis an ABAP proxy and the receiver is reached by a jave adapter.
With Ehp1 the SOAP adapter offers the possibilty to chose XI 3.0 as message protocol.
We use this feature already in scenarios where ABAP proxy is receiver.
But is it also possible to use it at sender side?
Kind regards
Jochen

Hi Volker,
thanks for your help.
You could also use ABAP proxy at sender side during integrated configuration.
Prerequisite is to implement SAP note 1349125 and use following url for acessing the PI from SAP backends.
http://<host>:<port>/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?ximessage=true
With this URL you could ABAP proxies in normal scenarios where integration server is involved as well as in integrated configurations.
Kind regards
Jochen

Sender Mail Adapter Configuration error

Hi,
I am working on scenario mail adapter to CRM system. And when I tried to configure the sender email adapter I have got the error following error, Can any one help me to resolve this issues
error occured: exception caught during processing mail message; java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
the details I have provided are as follows
Transport protocol is POP3
URL - POP://mailservername/Inbox/folder
And I have tried with the IMAP4 also
URL - IMAP://mailservername/Inbox/folder
And we have cross checked that the XI server is able to ping that particular mail server.
Regards,
Venkat.

Hi Venkateswara,
I would suggest that you go through these to know how to configure your sender mail adapter,
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/18/xi-sender-mail-adapter--payloadswapbean--step-by-step mail adapter step by step</a>
<a href="/people/prasad.ulagappan2/blog/2005/06/07/mail-adapter-scenarios-150-sap-exchange-infrastructure adapter Scenario</a>
Also, to know the various parameters of a sender mail adapter, just go through this link,
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/23/c093409c663228e10000000a1550b0/content.htm">Configuring sender mail adapter</a>
Check your mail adapter configuration against these details. Also, check if the mail server you are trying to access is running.
Also go thru this pdf to make yourself more comfortable with mail adapters.
https://websmp205.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700004556712005E/HowTo_Mail_Adapter2.pdf
Regards,
abhy

Mail Adapter Configuration in XI 3.0

Hi all,
i tried to set up a process using the mail adapter. Unfortunately it doesn't work. Has anyone succeeded in setting up a process with the mail adapter using POP3 and SMTP?

Hi Michael,
I did not find any documentation of the XI 3.0 mail adapter so result of practical test only for outgoing mail using SMTP:
Mail server settings:
SMTP port 8025 (you can configure any port of course)
Account demo, password test
Mail adapter configuration:
Bubble adapter java class
classname=com.sap.aii.messaging.adapter.ModuleBubble
Bubble.Helper=com.sap.aii.messaging.adapter.ModuleBubbleHelperXIMailImpl
Part 0 : common part ######
Mail.MailSubject="mail from adapter z_outmail"
Mail.MailFrom=[email protected]
Mail.MailTo=demo@<you mail server name>
XIALL or XIPAYLOAD
Mail.MessageProtocol=XIPAYLOAD
Mail.Log=1110
Part : XI client to Mail server ######
OMail.TargetURL=smtp://<you mail server name>:8025
OMail.User=demo
OMail.Password=test
The port and path where the adapter waits for XMB messages from clients.
XI.Port=8240
XI.Path=/z_outmail
It look so that there is no POP3 support, just only IMAP.
Jiri

Want to delete all the mails in the mail box configured for BPM Portal

Hi All,
Do you have idea to perform this activity.
I want to delete all the mails in the Dev mail box configured for BPM Portal.
Server and mailbox details as given below :
Mail a/c = Y00123
Mail server = sap.mail.com
Thanks, Sanjay

http://java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/JavaMail/contents.html
http://www.jguru.com/faq/view.jsp?EID=17035
if you know the password of the account, i think you can also access the mail using mail client, like you use outlook to deal with your company mail daily.

PI 7.1 Integrated Configuration for AAE - Issue Accessing Attachment

Hello All,
PI 7.1 in its new features allows access to the Attachment using UDF's withing Graphical Mapping.
Tried this feature and works good in Graphical mappings; am able to access the Attachment; and write it into a Field on my target. This works with the standard XI pipeline steps of passing message from AE to IE back to AE.
When trying to use the same set up with the Advanced Adapter Engine, - Integrated Configuration; this feature doesn't seem to work and the mapping run time triggers a Null Pointer Exception.
None of the SAP documentation discusses this as a limitation of AAE and hence am wondering if this is a bug or is this a limitation? Has anyone on the forum tried this?
Regards
Bhavesh

Hi Bhavesh,
I also tried this scenario long back when PI7.1 was in Rampup mode. We tried and first part was working fine as you also written, but in second part we got stuck. After some research, we found that we cannot configure additional communication scenarios that contain, for example payload-based routing or a message split, with Integrated Configuration. You must define separate receiver determinations, interface determinations, and communication agreements to configure communication scenarios of this type. We can only configure communication scenarios where message is transfered withing AAE.
MAy be you need to check the receiver interfaces and Mappings or may somthing missing there.Also check for authorized Service User.
Possibilities are like something missing is in Integrated Configuration but not sure.
Regards
Aashish Sinha

Dynamic Configuration not working with Integrated Configuration

Hi All,
Dynamic Configuration works fine in PI 7.3 when Classical Configuration is used. However the same does not work using Integrated Configuration.
Scenario :
SOAP -->SOAP Synchronous scenario in PI 7.3 (Dual Stack).
Trying to save a value from Request mapping using dynamic configuration and use the same in response mapping.
UDF Code :
Request Mapping :
DynamicConfiguration conf = (DynamicConfiguration) container.getTransformationParameters().get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
DynamicConfigurationKey Variable = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP", "Variable1");
conf.put(Variable, a);
Response Mapping :
DynamicConfigurationKey Variable = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP", "Variable1" );
string1 = conf.get(Variant);
Note : Using Integrated Config(AAE Processing) - Response header does not have DynamicConfiguration header node , but Classical Configuration has that.
Regards,
Parimala
Edited by: ParimalaE on Mar 1, 2012 1:33 PM

For us this is what we had:
This didn't work (getInputParameters is the newer stuff that doesn't work):
DynamicConfiguration dc = (DynamicConfiguration)container.getInputParameters().getValue(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
DynamicConfigurationKey dck = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP","TServerLocation");
dc.put(dck,"https://xyz.api-salesforce.com/services/Soap/c/26.0/0DFa00000008jis");
return "";
This works for us(we had to remove getInputParameters):
DynamicConfiguration dc = (DynamicConfiguration) container.getTransformationParameters().get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
DynamicConfigurationKey dck = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP","TServerLocation");
dc.put(dck,"https://xyz.api-salesforce.com/services/Soap/c/26.0/00D3000000001X0");
return "";

Integrated Configuration in PI 7.1

Hi All,
I am using 3 BAPIS at the receiving side out of which 1 BAPI will be picked as per the condition in the condition editor.
1.So,do I need to tick the "Sender Uses Virtual Receiver" check-box in the "Integrated Configuration" section
2.But when I go for creating the "Integrated Configuration"section without ticking the "Sender Uses Virtual Receiver" check-box ,
it gives me the error that it is already assigned to the object;conflicting direct connections,sender agreements,or integrated configurations are not permitted.
3.I have configured the Sender Agreement,Receiver Agreement before the "Integrated Configuration" section.So,what shall I do?Shall I tick the "Sender Uses Virtual Receiver" check-box in the "Integrated Configuration" section ?
Thanks in advance.

Hi ,
Thanks for the reply.
Actually I am having the Process Order coming in the source with 5 to 6 relevant fields.Out of these Process Order fields Status is one of the fields.Based on the the StatuS field the BAPIs will be called at the receiver.So can I skip Integrated Configurations as I am imposing the condition on the data in the payload(Source Structure) as Integrated configuration will not be helpful in my scenerio.?
Or shall I skip Sender Agreement ,Receiver Agreement?
Also,in PI 7.1 Integration Directory there is one section as "Value Mapping Group".I suppose that it is used if and only if value mapping is used.But I am not using any kind of value mapping so can I skip that section?
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Shweta Kullkarni on Aug 19, 2009 5:19 AM

Exception in Integration Configuration

Hello,
we get an exception in the Integration Directory when we create an Integration Configuration. When saving the changes we get the following error message:
Internal error: Link from Integrated Configuration | bs_cbp_c | http://BusinessPartner/asynchronous | BPartnerModifyAOut | | to object type "ifmoper" with role "IIF0" is not permitted
Can someone explain, what this message should tell us?
May it be that this error occur when using a service interface of type "Stateless (XI-3.0 compatible)"? This is the case here...
We are running on a SAP PI 7.1 EhP1...
Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards,
Lars

Hello Lars
There are some known issues in this area. See the notes below:
1) #1338699 Assigned users in Integrated Configuration
2) #1322118 Expression Editor in Integrated Configuration
I recommend that you apply the latest XI patches for your current SP release. This way you will have all the latest bug fixes. See note #1335523 FAQ: Deployment PI Patches in Release 7.1 and higher.
Regards
Mark

Question about Integrated Configuration (Advanced Adapter Engine in PI 7.1)

Hello,
When you use Advanced Adapter Engine in PI 7.1 with Integrated Configuration scenario, it bypasses ABAP stack therefore you can't monitor processed message in SXMB_MONI. Instead this message shows up only in RWB Adapter Engine message monitoring. When you select the message from there, you can view the BEFORE mapping payload in Message Content tab. My question is how do you view the AFTER mapping payload when using Integrated Configuration.
Thanks,
Jay

> My question is how do you view the AFTER mapping payload when using Integrated Configuration.
You can't.
So first you have to configure a standard scenario and test the stuff. When everything is fine, remove the standard scenario and create an Integrated Configuration.

Parameter setting for RFC Lookup in Integrated Configuration

hi Experts,
I am using AAE feature of PI 7.1 to create a file to file scenario with mapping.
I have to perform RFC_LOOKUP in mapping.
I have Created a parameters in Message Mapping and Operation Mapping and performed required binding between them.
Details of parameter are:
   Name:         RFC_Lookup
   Category:    Adapter
   Type:          RFC
   Parameter: Import
I am using Integrated Configuration in ID.
Please tell me where do I assign values to parameter in ID when using Integrated Configuration.
Thanks.
Girish

Hi guys,
I have the same issue.
I want to use an parameterzied mapping during an integrated configuration.
But I don´t find any place to specify the value for the parameter.
Are parameterized mappings not possible with integrated configuration?
If I create an normal configuration using interface determination, I could specify the parameter value
Kind regards
Jochen

E-mail integration configuration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for