E Recruiting- Ex employees into Talent pool

Hi All
We want to access left employees in the e Recruiting Talent group. We are following two server architecture. Meaning we are a standalone system for e Rec and using ALE to pull the data of employees data (internal candidates) into e Rec.
Is it possible to assign the left employees into alumni? Is it a standard ALE or it is a development?

Dear Radhika,
Since the employee leaves the company in one country, the candidate belonging to this old personnel number becomes an external candidate. This is important for employees, that are leaving the company
completely, so that their open applications can still be processed and that they can be found in the talent pool in case an appropriate vacancy comes up for them.
So if you distribute your employee using ALE, the employee is only set to inactive if he leaves the company in HR and the flag "inactive" is set in table HRP5102 in E-recruiting then the old personnel number becomes an external candidate.
Hopefully I was able to clarify your request,
Best Regards
Christine Morin
Senior Support Consultant

Similar Messages

  • E-Recruitment Recruitment home page under Talent Pool Database

    Hi
    E-Recruitment
    Recruitment home page under Talent Pool Database under search for candidate getting Internal Error
    u201CAn internal error occurred. Please try again lateru201D
    Why this error coming?
    Please any one guide me
    Regards,
    Eshwar

    Hello eshwar,
    whenever there is this "An internal error occurred, ..." message in sap e-recruiting you should have a look into T-Code SLG1 and check the application log. There you will find additional information.
    If you cannot solve the problem with this additional information just post the log information here. Probably someone will be able to help.
    Kind Regrads
    Roman

  • Internal Error in Search for Candidate in Talent Pool in E-Recruitment

    Hi All,
    I've problem in Search in Candidates in Talent Pool in E-Recruitment in SAP E-Recruitment. When I search with text, it just gives internal error. I digged into the BSP Application as well. In the funtion call "SDOK_INDEX_COMBINED_SEARCH_XML" returns error "document area not specified" and raises an internal error. Anyone faced similar issue??? Please Help!!!
    Thx,
    Anand

    Well, obviously you never used any component of KPRO yet.
    Just upload an attachment onto the candidate's profile.
    An index category should automatically be created.
    Also generate search profiles and plan the periodical service RCF_PERIODICAL_SERVICES. You can find the documentation about this report and search profile via IMG.
    Also look if HR_KW is checked within transaction SKPR06.
    Message was edited by: Sebastian Menger

  • E-Recruiting Search functionality for Candidate in Talent Pool

    For search functionality of candidates in the talent pool, does anyone have any idea how the ranking percentage is calculated??  There is no clear documentation out there about what factors are used and how they are weighted.  I am aware that additional ranking that can be defined in the configuration and also questionaire results can influence this ranking as well.
    However, in the absence of this additional ranking in talent management and questionaire results to job postings, are the selection criteria for the search the only items taken into account for calculation for this ranking percentage? 
    What is everyone else's experiences in the fact that search functionality tends to treat the various selection criteria as 'OR' conditions?  The client I am working for is unhappy that candidates who don't match every set of selection criteria are being displayed on the hitlist.  Would like to hear what other client's responses has been to this...
    Sandra

    Had directed this question to SAP and did not get an adequate response to date with regards to how ranking is calculated.
    However, SAP did respond to why search functionality treating the various selection criteria as 'OR' conditions for searching candidates in Talent Pool.  This is due to configuration values in tables T77RCF_SRCH_ATTC and T77RCF_SRCH_ATTR.  The field RANKING must be set to blank value.  SAP delivers this as 'X' - ranking percentage is calculated.  This change now makes the combination of various selection criteria elements as 'AND' conditions, and the ranking percentage is no longer displayed.
    Sandra

  • E-Recruitment : Talent Pool & Workflows

    Hi!
    Can some one please guide me with the below queries..
    1) does the profiles of unregistered candidate or the candidate who's details have been entered by the data entry clerk become the part of talent warehouse ??
    2) can be have a workflow between requester and recruiter ? i mean once a requester raises a requisition it should be approved at two levels and then be seen on recruiter's list ?
    Thanks & Regards.....

    Hi Sanjay,
    Answers to your questions are as below;
    1) What the Data entry clerk submits is a application and not a candidate profile. Only when the candidate registers himself and makes his profile available (Candidate Profile in "Released" status), his candidature becomes a part of the talent pool.
    2) The requisition workflow is available when E-recruiting services are implemented in MSS. Standard ISR forms SRQ1(Without aspproval) and SRQ2 (With approval scenario) is available which can be used for implementing the workflow. The Standard ISR scenario SRQ2 can be cloned and cutom workflow with multiples levels of approval can be implemented before the Nb - Requisition is available with the Recruiter for releading the requisition and subsequently dong the job posting.
    Hope this information helps.
    Best Regards
    G Raj

  • E-rec: talent pool integration w/ external vacancy board

    Hi,
    Our customer is downsizing, which means 6000 employees will lose their jobs in the future. To help these employees find another job, our customer wants their e-recruiting application for internal employees to integrate with an external job postings/vacancies, example MonsterBoard. This way, management and also other employees can search for vacancies outside their business, and give advise/tell on employees what would fit their qualifications. This means that the customers Talent Pool, with all education, work experience and other qualifications,  should be open for external job postings/vacancies.
    The integration is two-ways and the two parties must share databases. Mapping of qualification and other vacancy specific data is also a must. I also suspect we face a search engine challenge.
    Does anyone have experience on an implementation with functionality as described?
    Any competance on the topic is welcome!
    Kind regards,
    Hilde Bakkemyr

    -

  • Talent pool creation

    Hi Experts,
    Can anyone guide regarding  Talent Pool Creation?
    Is it possible in standard configuration or additional complexities are there?
    Regards,
    RK.

    Hi,
    you have to logon to Talent Management specialist via enterprise portal. There you can create Talent Pools. It is only possible with the web dynpro UI! It is not possible from SAP backend.
    But you need enterprise search up and running to assign employees to the talent pool as talent management specialist.
    As a Manager you can assignt employees to a Talent pool.
    best regards
    Martin Hastik

  • Deactivate users who are no longer exist in AD but were added into resource pool

    Hello forum members,
    does anyone know how to deactivate users who are no longer exist in AD , but were added into resource pool?
    I an trying to write some code that would update a custom value for each resource, but my code breaks whenever it encounters a resource that is not longer exists in AD. Any suggestions are appreciated.
      // Modify the resources, code was taken from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/websvcresource.resource.updateresources(v=office.12).ASPX
                    foreach (SvcResource.ResourceDataSet.ResourcesRow resourceRow in resourceDs.Resources)
                        Console.WriteLine("Check out " + resourceRow.RES_NAME);
                        if (resourceRow.IsRES_CHECKOUTBYNull())
                            resourceSvc.CheckOutResources(new Guid[] { resourceRow.RES_UID });
                            checkedOut = true;
                        else
                            if (resourceRow.RES_CHECKOUTBY == me)
                                checkedOut = true;
                            else
                                checkedOut = false;
                                Console.WriteLine("\tCan't check out this resource, skip updating this one.");
                        if (checkedOut)
                            SvcResource.ResourceDataSet updateDs = resourceSvc.ReadResource(resourceRow.RES_UID);
                                if (resourceRow.RES_TYPE <= (int)PSLibrary.Resource.Type.INACTIVATED_OFFSET)
                                    updateDs.Resources[0].RES_CODE = "A" + rand.Next(1000, 9999);
                                    Console.WriteLine("Update RES_CODE to " + updateDs.Resources[0].RES_CODE);
                                    resourceSvc.UpdateResources(updateDs, false, false);
                                    Console.WriteLine("Check in " + resourceRow.RES_NAME);
                                    resourceSvc.CheckInResources(new Guid[] { resourceRow.RES_UID }, false);
                        Console.ForegroundColor = ConsoleColor.Yellow;
                        Console.WriteLine("".PadRight(30, '-'));
                        Console.ResetColor();
    tatiana

    This is the logic I used:
    1) Try to inactivate the user
    2) If it fails with "AdminNTAccountNotFound" then delete
    try {
    using( OperationContextScope ocs = new OperationContextScope( resourceClient.InnerChannel ) ) {
    resourceClient.CheckOutResources( new Guid[] { resourceUID } );
    // Perform the update
    rsDS = ( SvcResource.ResourceDataSet ) rsDS.GetChanges();
    resourceClient.UpdateResources( rsDS, false, true );
    catch( Exception ex ) {
    if( ex.Message.Contains( "AdminNTAccountNotFound" ) ) {
    try {
    resourceClient.CheckInResources( new Guid[] { resourceUID }, true );
    catch {
    //The resource does not have a valid account, deleting...
    using( OperationContextScope ocs = new OperationContextScope( resourceClient.InnerChannel ) ) {
    resourceClient.CheckOutResources( new Guid[] { resourceUID } );
    resourceClient.DeleteResources( new Guid[] { resourceUID }, "No longer in RBS structure and/or AD" );
    120811049008

  • Does anyone make a water-tight, fully submergible, case for iPod Touches?  I am looking for one that could be taken into a pool or ocean, so that you could take underwater pictures.  Thank you!

    Does anyone know if anyone makes a waterproof, fully submergible case for iPod Touches, 4th Generation? I am looking for one that can be taken into a pool or ocean, where I would be able to take underwater pictures or videos. I've tried numerous web sites, including "Otter Box", but have been unable to find one for the iPod Touch.  I believe there might be one out for iPhones, but can't find one for an iPod Touch. Thank you for any help.

    I found this review...
    http://travel.spotcoolstuff.com/ipod-itouch-nano-accessories/best-waterproof-cas e
    Unfortunately, it sappears that the cameras are covered by the cases. I'm look too as I'm starting SCUBA lessons.

  • Cannot Load Index Into Keep Pool

    I've sucessfully loaded my ctxsys.context index into the keep pool (works great) using the web page: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/text/htdocs/mem_load.html .
    I'm now trying the techniques to load a regular index (that joins to my text index).
    I've executed:
    alter index PROD_SVC_NDX storage (buffer_pool keep);
    Then I tried the hint INDEX_FFS on the base table:
    select /*+ INDEX_FFS ( INDEXDATA , PROD_SVC_NDX ) */ count(svc_code) FROM INDEXDATA ;
    The optimizer shows a ffs in the algorithm:
    INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PROD_SVC_NDX |524K| 2047K|251 (2)| 0:00:04
    WHEN I QUERY THE BUFFER CACHE, only 9% of the index is in the keep pool..
    Owner............. Name...........................Type...........Cache....... %BLOCKS........POOL........BSize
    SYSTEM.......PROD_SVC_NDX...........INDEX..........1,248.................9..............KEEP.........8,192.
    How do you load regular index blocks into keep pool?
    What would be the best Oracle forum for this question?
    Joe

    I think the optimizer will always use a full scan for such a query, regardless of hints. What you need to do is fetch all rows individually. This can be done in a PL/SQL block with an outer loop which fetches all the indexed values, and an inner select that performs an indexed lookup with each value. For example:
    Given a table with a primary key index:
    create table foo (pk number primary key, bar varchar2);
    Populated:
    insert into foo values (1, 'aa');
    insert into foo values (2, 'ab');
    insert into foo values (3, 'ac');
    We could do this:
    declare
    v_bar varchar2(2);
    begin
    for q in (select pk from foo) loop
    select bar into v_bar from foo where pk = q.pk;
    end loop;
    end;
    It may well not be necessary to fetch every row - you should experiment and see whether maybe fetching every 10th row - or even every 100th row - is sufficient to fetch all index blocks into the SGA.
    - Roger

  • I was pushed into a pool while I was holding my iPhone 5 what can I do?

    I was pushed into a pool while I was holding my iPhone 5 what can I do?

    There is a technique to dry the phone out, but by the time it dries out you would have your replacement phone anyway. Even so, the water damaged phone is likely never going to work 100% again.

  • RMI ClassFormatError *_Stub (Bad index into constant pool)

    I get a
    java.lang.ClassFormatError: RollGrinder_Stub (Bad index into constant pool)
    when I try to instatiate my class that extends UnicastRemoteObject in my main RMIServer code.
    java version "1.3.1_01" on RedHat Linux 7.1
    Can anybody help me?

    Never mind I am an idiot. I was using javac & java from 1.3 but was using rmic & rmiregistry from an older version of java

  • ClassFormatError *_Stub (Bad index into constant pool)

    I get a
    java.lang.ClassFormatError: RollGrinder_Stub (Bad index into constant pool)
    when I try to instatiate my class that extends UnicastRemoteObject in my main RMIServer code.
    java version "1.3.1_01" on RedHat Linux 7.1
    Can anybody help me?

    Never mind I am an idiot. I was using javac & java from 1.3 but was using rmic & rmiregistry from an older version of java

  • Make a requistion drop into autocreate pool for a new supplier

    Hi we have a requirement identified that if a requisition is over a certain amount (£250) and it has been raised against an existing supplier for it to drop into the autocreate pool and not be sent out to the supplier isntantly.
    i had an idea of creating a CPA with a approved limit of 250 but this does not make it drop into the pool?
    any ideas?
    cheers

    Hi
    You may wish to change the title of this post as collapsible panels and drop down menus are quite different thing, (on is possible the other not).
    For the pure css menu see - http://ago.tanfa.co.uk/css/examples/menu/tutorial-h.html.
    PZ

  • Record Working Time task merging multiple employees into a single task

    Hi Everyone,
    I'm going to check our configuration again to see if this is standard behaviour, config, or a problem with EHP 3's version of record working time.
    So if employee A submits to manager A 1 task is created.  Then when employee B submits to manager A we were expecting 2 tasks.  However, we've been noticing manager A is getting 1 task with several line times. 
    We are ok with it merging tasks for employee A over multiple weeks.  That is ideal actually.
    The problem is that employee B's task should be separate.
    Is there a quick fix?
    Thanks,
    Doug Robbins

    I did try 31000007 and noticed the same behavior.  Are you saying I should use an older version of the task to get back to grouped by employee number and not merging everything? 
    Well this causing us issues for a few reasons. The main one we developed a work around because we had to make sure emails were not being sent to 1 person for all the employees with their data.  That would cause obvious security concerns. 
    But when forward tasks out managers want to be able to forward a specific employee's requests and not all of them.  If some customers want this it should be a configurable option.  To allow companies that want 1 single task or companies that want 1 task/employee/week.
    This is inconsistent with the other portal applications.  It would be nice if Germany picked 1 way of doing things or provided more configuration options.  I'm hoping that OSS gives us something because merging everything into a single task for all employees is not the behaviour we want or expected.
    I always appreciate your input because you have been very helpful as I learn about portal.
    Thanks,
    Doug R
    Thanks you

Maybe you are looking for