E Recruitment candidate status update report

Hi Friends,
As per the standard process candidate staus can be updated for any activity based on the design of the workflows, due to some reason some of the events have'nt triggered for some time, so that it won't update the status as per the design,
Now user wants to update all the relevant status at one instance, so we are developing a custom report to update the candidacy status manually for specified period by considering the application status in table HRP5132 and update the same status for candidate in candidate information through HRP 5133.
So when user wants to change the status of candidacy for any activiy, he can choose and generate the report to change the status of the candidate.
Kindly provide your suggestions for the same.
Regards,
Venkat Charan.

Hi,
the candidate status is stored in Infotype 5102. The candidate status declares if a candidate released his profile for pool search or not. A bit strange is that there are 3 values for the status - one for not released, and 2 different values for released - let's just say this is e-recruiting history.
Applications and assingments to requisitions (akaCandidacies) have their own independent status. Stored in their infotypes 5132 (Application) 5133 (Candidacy).
All status are domain value lists - so they cannot be customized.
Hope that answers the question.
Best Rgds,
Roman Weise

Similar Messages

Report on "Status updates history"

Hi,
i need to check if resource are updating task from "My Task". Is it possible to estract a report on "Status updates history"?
I mean this type of data:
Approval Date
Action
Status
Info
Task Name
Project
Type
Start
Finish
Actual Work
Remaining Work
% Complete
Assigned To
Approved By
Thanks
Daniele

Hi Daniel,
You will probably have to create a join with the MSP_ASSIGNMENT_TRANSACTIONS Table.
See reference here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/project_programmability/archive/2008/01/03/statusing-transactions-partial-documentation.aspx
Hope this helps.
Guillaume Rouyre - MBA, MCP, MCTS

Status update for MeeGo on the N900

Here's a copy of the text sent by Harri Hakulinen from Nokia. He is the project lead for MeeGo on the N900. This message was sent to the MeeGo developer mailing list just now:
Hello MeeGos !
This is brief status update of "MeeGo to N900" project. This project is currently running as Nokia project, and I am Nokia project lead for it. The current closed mode of development is not the target for us at all, but rather transitional condition. As already discussed by Valtteri in TSG meeting, we are looking into going more open mode shortly. One reason why we have done this on this way is that at the same time we have been trying to handle opening of many currenly closed components that are needed in MeeGo and to build feasible MeeGo images for N900.
However, a lot of related work is already done completely open, you can find more info from places like ofono.org, connman.net and meego.gitorious.org . So if you are eager to contribute or want to closely follow whats happening, please work on those.
As you know, we have delivered working MeeGo images for N900 as part of first code drop in the end of March. At that state we were using older kernel version on N900 than on Atom side, as we used the same kernel (.28) than what is used in Maemo 5 based products today. We ended up doing that simply because lack of time to contribute and port all the drivers to the newer kernels.
Now, for the upcoming May release of MeeGo, we are going to use the same kernel version (.33) than Atom based devices are using. For that we need to submit number of ARM-architecture patches to MeeGo as well, because many of the required ones have just been contibuted upstream kernel and were not available in .33 version originally.
We have already enabled most of the main drivers, like LCD, GFX, Wlan and BT. Still, there is a lot to do in order to enable .33 on N900, like audio drivers, and modem subsystem including SSI buss driver, modem data and audio drivers etc. Our adaptation guys are in fact contributing those modem subsystem related drivers as we speak, and if you are following kernel mailing lists you can see how that goes on.
Besides of enabling the new kernel, we are working with number of smaller and bigger issues for N900. Starting from the beginning, we are now based on ARMv7 combiled code, so the code should be better optimised for N900 now. ARMv5 compilation that was in use for code drop will still be there, and it also seems to be used at least by community project that is planning to release MeeGo for good old N810 tablets
Also, we are planning to enable dual booting of Maemo 5 and MeeGo for the upcoming release. So that will be offered as 3rd way to setup MeeGo to N900, including the existing "native" MeeGo only on N900 and chroot based MeeGo on Maemo 5 setups. Taking the dual boot mode into use likely includes upgrade to Maemo5 kernel as well, but that should not be big issue in the process of enabling that.
As I don't want to go ahead of others working on MeeGo architecture and other issues I will stop now, but I will report again when we have more to tell about the subject.
Br,
// Harri

Here's another update..
It seems that MeeGo on the N900 is not directly being driven by Nokia! It's an open project.. so the net result is MeeGo on the N900 may look and feel very different to Meego on the N900's sucessor
Either way, I'm certainly greatful for their efforts!
Hello Meego's,
As indicated in my previous mail about "MeeGo for N900" status, we were planning to open up our MeeGo work around N900. Now I am happy to announce, that we are there
First, to make it absolute clear for everybody: This is about open MeeGo adaptation to N900 device.
Like any other MeeGo project, it is open source project for all applicaple purposes, and does NOT directly have links to any potential Nokia product or potential product plans. So, based on this or any other of my posts, please do NOT start or continue speculation of upcoming Nokia MeeGo releases. That is practically not helpfull, and mostly only takes our time when we need to explain our words and actions in detail to various directions.
From our part, we are trying to implement the open development model that has been discussed now so many times around MeeGo. On practical terms, we are trying to work based on proposal by Carsten Munk, see
http://wiki.meego.com/Proposal_for_Best_Practices_for_working_in_a_MeeGo_team
We have already created some resources that will be used by the team, you can learn about those and the upcoming ones from http://wiki.meego.com/ARM/N900. We have IRC channel for realtime discussion, we will use meego-dev mailing list for normal discussions and announcements, and we will have Gitorius project for code.
We will evolve our practicies during the work, so if you are interested, stay tuned to those channels. I belive that soon we are also able to figure out, what is best way for community members to help us in development, and then effectively be part of the team.
I would also like to use this as opportunity to introduce the team behind this work (so far) and also thank them about their hard work and long hours. We have team that consist of some Nokia subcontractors and also growing team of Nokia personel:
"MeeGo for N900" team (so far)
- Cybercom Turku team; Marko Saukko, Jouni Peltonen, Sami Sirkiä, Jari Smura and Luka Milovanov.
- Cybercom Tampere team; Kalle Lampila,Teemu Tuominen,Tuukka Mäkinen and Ville Marjusaari.
- Carsten Munk via Nomovok
- Jarkko Nikula via Atomide
- Jan-Simon Möller from Linuxfoundation
- Nokia team; Alexander Kanevskiy, Felipe Contreras, Markus Lehtonen, Ameya Palande, Sakari Poussa, Roger Quadros and me.
In addition to official project team, many Nokia people have helped us despite their hectic daily work, even with their free time. Most of them are driven by the desire to open, repurpose and upstream all relevant sw that has been originally created for Maemo 5 based N900 product during previous years.
Marko, Jouni, Sami & Luka and Markus were working with me already on last year when we did prototypes and interoperability tests of Maemo & Moblin stuff combined in different ways. Based on those we had pretty good picture of what we are doing and why.
And of course, we have had very good and productive co-operation with various Intel teams since those times. Anas Nashif and many others from Intel's MeeGo team have done a lot for us by enabling ARM stuff in MeeGo OBS and repositories.
Last but not least, I want to give special thanks to Stskeeps (alias Carsten Munk . He has teached us how to operate on open, and he has also done respectable amount of this work since early days of Meego. In addition to that, I belive that his earlier work on Maemo community and on Mer project has in fact inspired all of us and shown a way to MeeGo alredy years ago.
Br,
//Harri

MRU and manual updatable report on same page

ok. I understand that we can't have more than one MRU process on a page. Actually it seems 2 regions using the same MRU seems to work fine, but I had a problem adding a 3rd region with a new MRU. So I resorted to putting in my own updatable report. The code works well if I use an independent page but does not do anything as soon as I add it to the page with the MRU process.
The base query is like:
select '***' as select_plate,
htmldb_item.hidden(31,p.plate_id) plate_id,
p.plate_ID "Plate Id",
htmldb_item.text(37, PLATE_BARCODE, 30) plate_barcode,
PLATE_TYPE ,
htmldb_item.checkbox(23, p.plate_id) sel,
htmldb_item.checkbox(8, p.plate_id) child,
htmldb_item.select_list_from_query(33, modified_by, 'select first_name || '' '' || last_name uname, upper(username) username from eims_user') modified_by,
MODIFIED_ON ,
STATUS,
UPLOADED_ON,
decode(p.FILENAME, null, 'N', 'Y') loaded,
pr.run_id assay_run
from plate p, plate_run pr
where p.plate_type = 'zzz'
and p.plate_id = pr.plate_id (+)
the update process looks like
begin
:p2_message := 'ok0';
for i in 1..htmldb_application.g_f31.count
loop
:p2_message := 'ok1';
:p2_message := :p2_message || htmldb_application.g_f31(i);
--if htmldb_application.g_f31(i) is not null then
update plate set plate_barcode = htmldb_application.g_f37(i),
modified_by = htmldb_application.g_f33(i)
where plate_id = htmldb_application.g_f31(i);
--end if;
end loop;
I added the p2_message to kind of trace what is happening. ok0 gets outputed in the multi-region page and nothing happen for the aupdate; while on the test page with this report as the only regio, I get the expected behavior and the update goes in correctly!
Is it correct to assume that the g_fxx arrays global to a page? I used g_f3x just to make sure there is no conflict with the ones generated with the MRU process.
Any help/hint is appreciated
--Nabil

Hi Alex,
You can use more than one region in the same page or even you can create multiple report in the same page. But remember you can not create as many region as you want, ofcourse there is limitation. Same theory applies to item.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
M Tajuddin
web: http://tajuddin.whitepagesbd.com

Status updates history period default

Hi
Is there any way to change the default status updates history date range from 3 months please? Currently as the status approver for a major change program I'm getting several hundred tasks to approve every day across multiple project plans; the problem
is that when I go in to clear down to run my weekly reports it lists every task submission for the last 3 months. The thing is, IE can take several minutes before it displays the page in full as it chews through all of the data which is annoying
to say the least.
I'd quite like it to show only the last 3 weeks, not the last 3 months.
Does anyone have any suggestions please?
Thanks.

Hi,
As far as I tested, changing the default 3 months range from the date range feature will unfortunaltely not be kept in your IE cache next time you'll navigate to the status update history page. Thus you'll have to set it again every time you access
the page.
I guess this 3 months default value might be changed programmabily but I can't help on this.
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MCP, MCTS |

Status update

Background : In TMS project IDOC interface is used to send out data from SAP to the external transportation planning systems. This interface includes sending of information related to outbound deliveries, which is performed with specific message type ZVXX_TMS1_TPSDLS. As soon as external system receives outbound delivery data from SAP it generates response messages with technical acknowledgment (message type STATUS) and sends it back to SAP. Then external system process data received from SAP and as data is processed, message with Functional acknowledgement (message type STATUS) is generated and sent out to SAP through XI.
In SAP STATUS messages update outbound delivery messages ZVXX_TMS1_TPSDLS with new statuses received from external system. In this way it is possible to have information in SAP regarding outbound delivery processing in External system.
The problem related to status update process is found. In some cases even STATUS IDOCs are created in correct order in SAP, they update ZVXX_TMS1_TPSDLS messages in incorrect order. And it makes not possible to track actual processing status of outbound deliveries in external system with message ZVXX_TMS1_TPSDLS status record.
Requirements
Basic requirement is to have status for outbound message TMS_TMS1_TPSDLS which reflects progress of data processing in external system.
The right sequence of status scheme is to process technical acknowledgment before the functional acknowledgment.
Can any one help ?

Hi,
One more method is to provide Milestone timing for critical loads/availability of reports.
For eg consider you have one chain loading data into a few critical targets. Depending on the data volume, load timings and post processing identify a critical milestone time by which everyday the chains should be complete. say 9.00 AM in clients time zone (normal beginning of business day when clients may expect a report).
Only in the scenario where its delayed you have to inform client through a mail with the reason for delay and expected time of availability. Otherwise when there is no delay its understood that data is available.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
JituK

SM12 "Diagnosis in update" reports "Error discovered"

Diagnosis in update reports the following in SM12:
09.10.2007 Dynamic List Display 1
Diagnosis in Update
Line
Step 1: Owner Keys / Dialog / Update
ok.
ENQKEY = 20071009203712187000000300*********.......................
ENQKVB = 20071009203712187000010300*********.......................
Step 2: Set Lock for Update
ENQKEY = 20071009203712187000010300*********.......................
ENQKVB = 20071009203712187000010300*********.......................
Object: ENQ_TEST
Granule: ENQ_TEST E ENQ_TEST ENQ_TEST ENQ_TEST ENQ_TEST
ok.
Step 3: Update Call, Pass On Lock
ok.
Step 4: Lock Passed On
ok.
Step 5: Wait for Update to End, Max.20 seconds
Update not completed after (seconds): 20
Locks not deleted
Step 6: Read Locks Messages from the Update
Step 7: Delete Locks
Error discovered ******************
Messages Received from Update
-No- -Time- -
Message Text -
ENQ_TEST ENQ_TEST ENQ_TEST ENQ_TEST
It is not possible for functional people to create/change any entry in table LFA1
I am able to see 3 update work process in SM50 out of which 2 shows to be running
but with a time entry as 496297 and 494093
Searching in SDN did not yielded much help.
Can anyone please help?
Regards,

Ruchit,
I am not able to interpret the information it is showing for the two processess.
But, it says that there is a sequential read going on, on table KOCLU and a report named SAPLV45U is running.
But there are no user except myself and one more in the system.
SM13 shows 10 update records. 2 have status enqueues deleted(shown in red).
Rest others show status initial(shown in green)
Please guide as to how interpret information about the work process if needed.
Regards,

Recruiting Requisition: Status Overview iview not refreshed

Hi
When new E-recruitment requisitions are created its not getting updated in the iview - Recruiting Requisition: Status Overview.
Its getting updated after many hours only. Can anyone provide the solution for refreshing the iview with the latest requisition say within few minutes.
Regards,
Sasha.

Hi
Can anyone please provide an input on this.
Regards
Sasha.

ERecruiting - Triggering of mail when candidate status changes

Hi All,
Is an email generated from the system, when a candidate status is changed?
Say for example if the Activity of an candidate is changed to "Status Change - Rejected", will an email will be generated?

Hello,
some general thoughts at the beginning:
Candidates do not have a rejected state. Candidate states are profile locked and profile released. Only applications and candidacies have a rejected state. It is very important for a technical view to have the obect types in e-recruiting very clear or you will get into big trouble sooner or later.
SAP delivered workflows are examples. They do not fit a production environment. Also the sap delivered activity and process customizing is an example (and no good one) you will have to design this according to the business needs in the project.
For the workflow question. It is possible to trigger a workflow by activity creation and activity completion. For status chage activities ths is the same as they are completed directly and never have status planned. The BOR object ERC_ACTIV contains both events, activtycreated is triggered directly, activitycompleted needs a note to run properly.
It is also possible to trigger a workflow by a status change of an object. The super BOR object ERC_OBJECT contains a statuschanged event, which is raised for all status changes of NA, NB, NC, ND and NE objects.
For rejection there are basically 2 scenarions.
Scenario 1
When rejecting a candidacy by creating a rejection activity you trigger a workflow based on the activity to create the corresponces activity automatically. You can either send it directly or just create it to allow the user to have an individual text. (I do not go into details of this workflow according to the chosen application-candidacy-relation, that would go to far at this point).
Scenario 2
When rejecting a candidacy directly in minimum data entry you do not have a status change activity as the status is set directly. In this case you have a workflow which is triggered directly by the status chang which again creates (and sends) the correspondence activity.
Of course you need checks to ensure the two workflows are not mixed.
Kind regards
Roman

Scan Status Lookup Report

I am just learning Invtory. What does it mean when an entry is blue in
the Scan Status Lookup Report?
Why do some entries say scanned but not stored. Does this mean that the
workstation scanned and it hasn't been uploaded to the database yet?
How can I force an inventory to go for the container?
Thanks,
John Jakus

Shaun Pond wrote:
> John,
>
> blue=scanned, not stored - updating the TID with this info now...
>
Cool, thanks. I was study it tonight and that was the impression that i
got. Wonder why so many haven't stored. Some that are blue have data so
I am assuming that is the latest scan hassn't stored. Yet there are some
that have never stored to the database. Need to learn that one.
Thanks Again,
John

Self Updating Report of Open Sales Orders (Maybe Crystal )

I want a self updating report of Open Sales Order. I want it to refresh constantly. I know that it could be an alarm but it would be executed every # minutes and dont want to. Any ideas ? I dont know Crystal Reports enough but is it posible ?

Hi ,
If I were you , I will not be crazy looking at my sales order in every 1 minutes ..I would train my users to check at least 15 minutes.
I understand what u are trying to do;you want that customer will see the latest open SO created ..but 15 minutes is good enough time .
I think you have to check if database size grows up big time ..so far no report has come to me from my clients for this set up .
make sure you are not saving an alert into database
If you are using multiple alerts , I will atleast monitor my database for a while to see i encounter performance issue ..
So far for one alert at every 15 minutes ..i think u should be fine ..
Hope this helps
Bishal

Navigate to the first item in a updatable report

on my page i have a master/detail form. When a new detail - record is created, the cursor navigate to the first item on the page => it is the first item of the master! What I have to do, that the cursor navigate to the first item in the new detail-record ??
Thanks
Robert

Hi Andy,
thank you for your answer.
When the program start, I can not find the cursor. I think, I have a problem to reference the item in the updatable report. I wrote the following lines:
<script language="JavaScript1.1" type="text/javascript">
alert('Vor Cursor Navigation');
first_field('#FKOM_RUFNR#');
</script>
(FKOM_RUFNR is a column of the select statement in the report!!)
A second problem: The cursor navigate to the field - first_field('FIELD_NAME') - every time. But the cursor should navigate to the field in the updatable report, if the button "ADD" in the region of the updatable report was clicked. If the page was displayed without clicking the ADD - button, the cursor should navigate to the first item in the master form ( like => Cursor focus: first item on the page). How can I do that ??
Thanks
Robert

Insert not working in updatable report

I have created an updatable report using the htmldb_item function with the facility to display an extra row (in order to create a new row).
I have then created a Create button that branches to the same page as the updatable reportn and a Branch.
I then created an after submit process that makes the insert of the data.
But apparently the process is not fired when I click the create button.
How do I have to do to fire a Submit on the page in order for my process to be run?
Thanks.

Just to amplify MtD's explanation, if you start to move a SINGLE clip and THEN hold down the Option key, the arrow will change form so that it has a 90 degree bend in it. Then when you release the clip in a new position by letting go of the mouse button, not only will it "insert" into the timeline at that position, but the gap in the timeline (where you pulled it from) will close.
It's really helpful when you are rearranging sound bites and don't want to have to manually close up the holes in the timeline. Unfortunately this only works when you are grabbing a single clip. If you do it with multiple clips it will still insert, but will leave an open hole in the timeline where you pulled the group from. Having Snapping (N) turned on is very helpful for this operation, by the way.

Unable to run bapis for project status update and date update together

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement to update the dates and status of a project WBS at level 4. I am trying to do update the CJ02 Transaction using standard BAPI available. I need to do both Date update and status update in the same LOOP PASS   i am using the below mention bapi. when i am doing so i am getting an error Project 'A._____' has been currently processed by ID i.e. my id.
I have tried putting a wait for 2 seconds in the code but its still not working. please find the order below in which i am calling the bapi.
Loop at itab.
if date_changed = 'X'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PROJECT_MAINTAIN'
      READ TABLE it_error WITH KEY message_type = c_e.
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
Commit
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
             EXPORTING
                  wait   = c_x
             IMPORTING
                  return = s_ret.
   endif.
endif.
if Status_change = 'X'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PS_INITIALIZATION' .
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BUS2054_SET_STATUS'
      READ TABLE t_result WITH KEY message_type = c_e.
      IF sy-subrc NE 0.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PS_PRECOMMIT'
             TABLES
                  et_return = t_ret.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
             EXPORTING
                  wait   = c_x
             IMPORTING
                  return = s_ret.
     ENDIF.
endif.
    WAIT UP TO 4 SECONDS.
endloop.

Try to use
SET UPDATE TASK LOCAL.
before each BAPI call.
Did you try to debug through your code, leaving sufficient time between BAPI calls? If it does work like that, then the above statement might help.

Delivery status update in sales document at PGI

Normally system updates the delivery status of sales document line level, when a delivery document is created with respect to that sales document line.
But I want system to update the delivery status (in sales doc. line) when PGI is done for respective delivery document; not at the creation of delivery document. Below I have shown the status updating scenarios that I expect.
Scenario 1
Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
Delivery Doc qty: 50 PCs
PGI: Not done
Status in Sales document line should be A (Open)
Scenario 2
Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
Delivery Doc qty: 50 PCs
PGI: 50 PCs
Status in Sales document line should be B (Partially delivered)
Scenario 3
Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
Delivery Doc qty: 100 PCs
PGI: 100 PCs
Status in Sales document line should be C (Fully delivered)
Can anyone propose a possible way of doing this (configuration/ user exits/ BADI etc,)?
Thanks,
Ramindu

Hi,
I dont know it with the use of ABAP development, but by functional logic, can suggest you to configure the rush order sales configuration for your particular sales order.
just check that availability of that particualar sales order is met or not prior to it.
and then automatically when your delivery doc is created, PGI would be done and the status of your sales order would be updated with it.
try it out on your development client, if it works out.
regards,
Siddharth.

E Recruitment candidate status update report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for