E3000 Deny Access Restrictions not releasing

I've just recently purchased a Cisco E3000 router.  
I've set up 3 Access Restriction - Deny policies using IP addresses.  Unless someone has a better idea I found I needed two policies to Deny from late at night (say 10.00pm) till first thing the next morning.  As this spans two days I needed a Deny policy from 10pm till midnight, and another for the next day from midnight till say 7.00am. 
Now to my problem, the laptops get 'Deny'ed exactly as they should within a few minutes of the set time, problem is they do not reconnect the next morning after the Deny time has passed.
Cisco help wasn't any help, and wanted me to use Cisco Connect.  However the overly simplistic options it provides are next to useless for me.   The web option has more flexibility, if only it'd work.
Do I need to need to force an Allow to override the Deny but establishing a fifth policy just for this purpose?  Don't know if this'll work but I've got no other ideas.  
All help greatly appreciated

Anyhow, I'll answer my own question based on one nights experience.
Made the 5th (and last, don't know why all the reviews say you can have 10 policies, there are only 5) an Allow policy for the previously restricted IP addresses with the parameters of Allow everyday for 24 hours.
Last night the Deny policies as the first in the list worked correctly and the two restricted laptops had access back again at the set time.  So on a test of one night it's all working correctly.
The trick was the inclusion of a universal Allow policy as the last policy to force a release of the Deny policies.  I'll post again if it doesn't work at some point in the future.

Similar Messages

  • WRT310N - Access restriction not functioning by MAC address

    I am trying to block internet access on my kids computer so they can do homework weekday nights.
    I have it set to Deny  on a specific MAC address (yes, I double checked the MAC ID), for specific hours during the week.
    Yet the internet access still exists during these times.

    Try with IP address, but most of the times the Access restrictions on the Linksys router doesn't function correctly. Go for some third party software, which can serve your purpose.

  • WRT150N Access Restrictions Not Working

    Good day everyone.
    I read posts that were similar to my problem in the forum but none of the solutions suggested solved my current quandary.
    I am using a WRT150N with firmware v1.00.5. I have a Linux setup with Squid connected to the network with the gateway 192.168.23.254. The WRT150N has a gateway of 192.168.23.1. The WRT150N is also connected to an Apple Base Station which serves as the Access Point for WiFi users.
    Squid limits access for IP addresses listed under the .254 gateway. But once I change my gateway to 23.1, everything is accessible. I want to block sites as well on the WRT150N. But every time I try to put a new Access Restriction, it doesn't work.
    I put in the IP Addresses on which to apply this restriction:
    The reason it skips addresses is because, the addresses are reserved. I click on Save Settings here and I save the settings again on the main page.
    Everytime I try to test it on the given addresses, I can still access the pages. Is there something I'm missing?
    Thank you in advance for your answers.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Try to upgrade/ re flash the firmware on your router.
    Connect computer with the Ethernet cable to the router Ethernet port.
    Download the firmware from the Linksys website .
    Open the setup page of the router.
    Go to the Administration tab and go to the sub tab Firmware upgrade.
    Browse and select the downloaded firmware and upgrade the firmware .
    After upgrading the firmware reset and reconfigure the router settings manually .
    And see if that helps you .

  • Access restrictions w/ WRT54G Ver 8 (Firmware 8.0.5).......

    It seems that Access Restrictions are a bit of a problem w/ the Linksys routers. Well, here's my story to go with the crowd. Hopefully, someone at Linksys / Cisco can provide a solution.
    I am wanting to set up access restrictions on my Linksys WRT54G Ver. 8 (Firmware 8.0.5). Following the "instructions", I built my access restrictions as follows:
    Policy 1
    Enabled
    Named for my PC
    Edited List of PC's - inserted my NIC MAC address and saved the settings
    Set to "Allow" Internet Access
    Everyday
    24 Hrs per day
    Saved Settings
    Policy 2
    Enabled
    Named for my daughters laptop
    Edited List of PC's - inserted her Wireless NIC MAC address and saved the settings
    Set to "Allow" Internet Access
    Sun - Thur: 07:00 AM - 09:30 PM
    Fri - Sat: 07:00 AM - 10:00 PM
    Saved Settings
    Policy 3
    Enabled Named for my wife's desktop
    Edited List of PC's - inserted her NIC MAC address and saved the settings
    Set to "Allow" Internet Access
    Sun - Sat: 06:00 AM - 11:00 PM
    Saved Settings
    ....then, I reset the router. Once up, I tried access from each PC...nothing. Couldn't get out.
    Thus, I went back into the Linksys set up, disabled the access restrictions. Viola ! I'm back on-line with all three PC's.
    Checked around the forum and found that some people had built a primary policy that included all of their PC MAC's or IP addresses and was "Enabled" and set to "Deny" Internet access 24/7. From there, they built out their access restrictions and, supposedly, they worked.
    I tried that as well...deleted all the access restrictions. Reset the router and went through the entire router setup to be on the safe side. Built the primary "Deny" access restriction then my other three PC restrictions. And....it still didn't work.
    Thus, I would really like to get this working so I can limit my daughters access. It's interfering with her school work so I want to lock her down a little bit. Friends are important to her but I've stressed that her education is even more important.
     Thus, if Linksys themselves or someone on the forums can provide an answer, excellent ! If not, I'll look into another router that can do the job. I'd rather not do that, but if the Linksys won't perform this function, I'll have to. Thanks in advance for any feedback.

    Thanks for the reply. I deleted all profiles and built just the two specific for my daughters laptop and one for my wife's PC. My wife's PC is running XP SP3. It follows the access restriction policy with no problems. My daughters laptop is running Vista Home Premium. With the policies active, her connectivity was sporadic for about an hour before it just finally shut off her connectivity completely...well before the policy was supposed to.
    Thus, I'm now thinking that thismay be a Vista problem to an extent as well(Gee....who would have thought that !?!?!?!?).
    I disabled the IP 6 protocol just as a precaution. Still no access. And when I disable the policies on the Linksys, she's back in service.
    Any further suggestions are appreciated.

  • Restrict documents from being assigned to a BOM while status is not release

    Hi,
    I need certain documents to be restricted while they are still 'In preparation' status.
    Currently eventhough the status is not released, user can assign a document to a BOM.
    I am sure i am missing something. Let me know if anyone has done this. We are not using ECM at this stage.
    Regards,
    Edi

    Hi,
    You can do this via workaround of authorization matrix.
    1. Create two users: Creator, Approver & Assigner
    2. Creator will not have authorization to release the document as well as to assign the document to BOM. Authorization to release the document can be prevented by authorization object C_DRAW_STA. The authorization of object linkage is controlled by object C_DRAD_OBJ               
    3. Approver will have authorization to release the document.
    4. finally assigner will have only document to access the change document when it is released and only then he/she will be able to assign the object linkage.
    Or you can go for BASi/User exit at the time of save to control the same.
    Thanks
    SUMIT GUPTA

  • Access Restrictions still not working with latest firmware

    Linksys WRT54GS V5 with firmware v1.52.2
    I cannot believe what a frustrating experience this is. All I want to do is block facebook.com from my two high schoolers until they’ve done their homework.
    Starting out, it simply did NOT work, and I discovered from this forum that the initial firmware did not work for this feature. So here is what I did:
    - Downloaded v1.52.2 firmware, which is indicated as being the latest for this router
    - Upgraded the router, per the instructions with this firmware.
    - Pressed (and held)the reset button for the indicated 30 seconds
    At this point, my router switched back to the default access point name and access password. Fortunately, I had backed up my configuration, so I then:
    - Loaded my previous configuration that included my Wireless security settings, different AP name, etc...
    - Powered down, then back up router, cable modem.
    Router now works wireless as before, but Access Restrictions still does not restrict. Router does list the correct firmware on the admin screens.
    Here is how I sent up my one (and only policy)
    Internet Access Policy: 1(facebook)
    Status: Enable
    Enter policy name: facebook
    PCs: Allow checked
    Days: Everyday checked
    Times: 24 hours checked
    Blocked Services: NONE
    Wewbsite Blocking by URL Addresses:
    3 entered, they are:
    http://www.facebook.com
    http://static.ak.facebook.com
    http://apps.facebook.com
    Website blocking by keyword: All 6 boxes empty
    This was easier to do on my old netgear router, and it also actually WORKED. ARGHHHHHH

    Thanks, but that did not work either. It seems to me that, entering mac addresses ended up totally taking away all internet access for the computers on the MAC list. This is really pathetic that a concept that on the surface seems so simple, as in 'deny access to hostname xxx.com' can be so difficult to implement. If there wasn't the suggestion that this were a feature of the router, I wouldn't care. But it *is* supposedly a feature, and the feature simply does not work.
    It seem to me that LinkSys has too many mutually exclusive options on a single page. It would be easier to grok if the hostname filter had it's own page, then you wouldn't be wondering what the 'deny/allow' check box did or did not do in conjunction with your selections.
    Does the feature work or not? As I mentioned, this was childishly easy to accomplish on my Netgear router. If it didn't suck so bad in other areas of performance, I'd simply go back to it.

  • Can not access CRM from outside the office network - Access denied You do not have sufficient access rights or privileges to perform this action.

    Hi,
    I can not access CRM from outside the office network - Access denied You do not have sufficient access rights or privileges to perform this action.  I can access CRM with same user id and password from our office inside the network.  I can get
    the page to give login details once I have login details I got below error. Please help me to solve this issue.  It was working before.
    Access denied You do not have sufficient access rights or privileges to perform this action. 
    Regards,
    Noushad
    [email protected]

    On Premise system Configured with AD FS server for claims-based authentication you need to update your host file with server url to access it from outside office network.
    Refer
    this on how to update host file.
    Regards, Saad

  • Access restriction error? not sure how to fix it....

    I am trying to use JPEGImageEncoder and i imported import com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.*; fine but i get the following error on my code:
    CODE:
    JPEGImageEncoder encoder =JPEGCodec.createJPEGEncoder(outImage);
    ERROR:
    Access restriction: The type JPEGImageEncoder is not accessible due to restriction on required library /usr/local/java/jdk1.6.0_07/jre/lib/rt.jar
    I am not sure how to fix this... anyone know what needs to be done? I am using eclipse and i see the rt.jar in my library....
    thanks!

    MikeTheBorg wrote:
    OK, I agree it's simpler for simple cases, but how do I do something like this:
              JPEGImageEncoder jie = JPEGCodec.createJPEGEncoder(os);
              JPEGEncodeParam jep = jie.getDefaultJPEGEncodeParam(bi);
              jep.setDensityUnit(JPEGEncodeParam.DENSITY_UNIT_DOTS_INCH);
              jep.setXDensity(1200);
              jep.setYDensity(1200);
              jep.setQuality(1, false);
              jie.setJPEGEncodeParam(jep);
              jie.encode(bi);
    using ImageIO?
    "Stupid" Eclipse+Maven refuse to compile this legacy code.It's an Eclipse error, not a Java/compiler error as such. To fix it, I believe you have to check your plug-in configuration -- imported packages here or exported packages there. Try adding "com.sun.image.codec.jpeg" to the imported packages. Something along those lines. Anyway, bottom line: this is not an issue with the code.
    Furthermore, lookee here: GIAD

  • "access restrictions" did not work sometimes when using 3-tier DeskI.

    My customer found that "access restrictions" did not work sometimes when using 3-tier DeskI.
    But this issue can be solved by logging on from another machine, or restarting the DeskI.
    For I can reproduce this issue, so I just want to know that:
    1.What is it probably related to?
    2.If this issue happens again, what can I suggest my customer for tracking it?
      For example, get some log files from servers etc.
    Thanks!

    Hi Sarah,
    Also you can try the following solution.
    1. Import the universe.
    2. Go to manage access restrictions
    3. Remove the restriction .
    4. Again create the rescrition and unchecked the " limit size of result set to"
    5. Now assign it to the unlimited results group ( this is the name of
    the group we have given to those users who should be able to retrieve
    more than X rows)
    6. Now we save the universe. (Dont export the universe).
    I hope this will help you.
    Regards,
    Sarbhjeet Kaur

  • Access Restrictions - Blocked Applications does not save

    Under the Access Restrictions section it is possible to Block Applications.
    I enter a name for the application, the port range (from and to) and whether it is TCP, UDP or both. I then hit ADD which adds the application to the list of Blocked Applications in the box above. I then scroll down thru that box to find the App and [>>] add it to the Blocked List. I then hit SAVE SETTINGS
    Upon returning to the policy and the Blocked Apps list the record I just created is nowhere to be found. Not in the Blocked List or under Applications.
    What gives ???

    Wireless-N Gigabit Router
    Model: WRT310N
    Firmware Version: v1.0.06
    All PCs run VISTA
    I don't see how a HARD RESET and POWER RECYCLE creates a fix for this. All that does is reboot the existing firmware and causes me to have to reenter all the router and security settings. The documentation for the lastest firmware (version Ver.1.0.9 build 4 12/11/2009) and the previous upgrade (1.0.07 build 14) does not include references to a fix for this problem. Has this been identified before and what firmware version is the fix included in ?
    I have held off performing the 1.0.9 firmware upgrade as I have no confidence that this will fix this problem.

  • Every time I try to call or they call me, my phone beugs I can not immediatly to call, denied access the directory for 2 to 4 minutes after that it works again   I tried all but nothing, everything works except the call   I have an iPhone 4 Version 6.1.3

    every time I try to call or they call me, my phone beugs I can not immediatly to call, denied access the directory for 2 to 4 minutes after that it works again
      I tried all but nothing, everything works except the call
      I have an iPhone 4 Version 6.1.3
    thank you for your help

    That is the highest you will be able to go with 3g. You need 3gs or 4 to go any higher (multi processors and more memory needed).  Version 4.2.1 marks the end of your updates for that device.

  • E3000 Access restrictions question

    Hi All,
    I have access restrictions set up for certain wireless devices in my home that the kids use to kick them off at 11 pm and keep them off all night. where I am running into a problem is I want to block these same devices from downloading anything without my permission  my son downloads everything he sees, Comcat has already threatened to kick us off their service if we go over 250 gb bandwidth use  in a  month again. so I want to configure something in the router that will block all downloads for specific wireless devices. with the access restrictions I have set up I used the mac address not just the ip so they have no way around it I constantly monitor what is connected. I am using the stock firmware as well
    any assistance that could be offered for this issue will be greatly appreciated

     Internet Access Policy – This feature allows you to set restrictions on a more specific way. You can create up to 10 access policies which restrict access according to MAC addresses, IP addresses, or ports. To know more about setting up Internet access policies,
    You can block the website even through certain time. But you cannot block the download from the Internet.

  • Access Restriction on EA3500 does not work.

    I tested this with my laptop by setting its access restriction/parental control to always not access the internet. But still my laptop can still search through wikipedia. Is this because of the router firmware? By the way I'm using the latest Connect cloud firmware. Thanks in advance.

    I believe parental control is not really busted, it's just designed to work only with ipv4. What you can try though is to try the following:
    Make sure that the laptop is only wirelessly connected to the router, because if the laptop was connected both wired and wireless then parental controls will not work since the laptop will be using two adapters.
    Remove the entry under target devices, disable parental controls and save the settings.
    Enable parental controls, add a target device, save the settings
    Try to check if you can access wikipedia or other website because if parental control was working then it should add for a password
    Try also to check the router's status tab if there's an ipv6 ip address because if there is, then parental controls will not work

  • Access Restriction tab is missing on e3000 web interface

    I am quite sure that this tab has been there before but now its missing - could it be because I have activated  Parent Control on Cisco Connect ?
    If so - how do I 'get It back'
    (I thing parent control in Cisco connect is too limited)
    Regards
    Fleohans
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Yes, the Access Restrictions tab goes away when the Parental Controls section is activated. According to the faqs, a hard reset is the only way to restore it.

  • "Top level objects not released" warning when accessing LabVIEW adapter through API

    I'm having a problem when using the TestStand API in LabVIEW:  I'm trying to get the VI path for a TestStand test step, but I'm getting the "Top level objects not released properly" warning.  It doesn't look like I'm forgetting to close something, but obviously I am.  Snippet is below, and warning text follows.  Anyone have any ideas?
    I'm using LabVIEW 2010 and TestStand 2010.
    This forum has been a huge help.  Thanks to everyone!
    -Joe 
    References to PropertyObjects were not released properly.    Total number of objects: 418    Number of top-level objects: 7
        Note: Some top-level objects may be included if they are referenced by    an incorrectly released top-level object. For example, an unreleased    SequenceContext object references a SequenceFile object.
        The following top-level objects were not released:
            Type Definitions [6 object(s) not released]            Type Definition #1:                Name: FlexGStepAdditions
                Type Definition #2:                Name: VIParameter
                Type Definition #3:                Name: VIParameterElement
                Type Definition #4:                Name: NI_LabVIEWParameterResult
                Type Definition #5:                Name: Expression
                Type Definition #6:                Name: Path
            And the following uncategoried objects:            LabVIEWModule (FlexGStepAdditions)                Name: SData
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Yep, that worked.  I thought that Variant To Data was just converting the module reference to the LabVIEWModule data type, but apparently I was wrong...  This TS leak checker is sure making me learn about how to properly close references... I've been programming memory leaks for years!
    I was also having problems with LabVIEW crashing after the VI ran, and fixing the order of the close references fixed that, too.
    Working code is below.
    Thanks a lot (again) Doug.
    -Joe

Maybe you are looking for