E4200 Bridge Mode + Guest Access?

Hi,
I'm trying to set up my E4200 in "Bridge Mode," but want to enable a few things in the wireless settings, such as:
a) choosing SSIDs and network keys,
b) enable Guest Access
I've been able to get things working without too much hassle:
* factory reset
* set wireless SSIDs and network keys
* enable guess access and set password
* turn on bridge mode
Everything is basically fine, except that when the device goes into bridge mode it seems that it shuts off *all* web UI. This kind of makes sense, but do I actually understand that correcty? (Or have I simply not found the right connection method?)
If so, it leads to a couple follow-on questions:
a) How do I disable Bridge Mode if I want to change any settings? (Is the answer just 'factory reset'?)
b) Can Guest Access mode work in Bridge Mode?
So far, I have not been successful in getting the device to display the login page for Guest Access. I'm not sure if that's a config problem with Guest Access or if that just doesn't work in Bridge Mode.
Any tips/advice appreciated.
thx

Dude buddy. This is your post:
gv
Expert
Posts: 11,833
Registered: 07-16-2006
0
Re: E4200 Guest Network Not Working [ Edited ]
06-24-2011 10:40 AM - last edited on 06-24-2011 10:41 AM
It's not possible to use guest access in bridge mode. Guest access is only possible when the E4200 operates as router. In bridge mode any wireless network goes directly into the same LAN. Guest separation would not be possible.
Also don't disable the SSID broadcast.
http://homecommunity.cisco.com/t5/Wireless-Routers/E4200-Guest-Network-Not-Working/td-p/406345/highl...
What I'm saying is that it is possible and that I am doing just that on our LAN here at work.
You pegged me on the linksys devices not allowing higher subnets. Alas, I am used to using DD-WRT and Tomato for years now (where you can use any subnet mask) and took for granted that I have not seen a stock linksys GUI in a long time. However, in bridge mode on the E4200 you are able to set subnet masks as you wish...

Similar Messages

  • E4200v2 Bridge Mode + Guest Access: No DHCP IP's assigned?!

    New E4200v2 on 2.0.37.  In "Bridge Mode - DHCP" (i.e. Access Point not router).  Guest Access is enabled & SSID broadcast.  Dhcp Server is disabled, because my main Sonicwall router is providing that for main LAN 192.168.1.0.
    PROBLEM = Client PC can see "-guest" SSID fine and associate to it, BUT PC does NOT receive a DHCP IP address (i.e. 192.168.33.x) therefore the browser login page never appears and guest access does not work.
    I'm pretty sure that it's all related to DHCP.  I'm assuming that the E4200 is not receiving or sending guest DHCP packets with the client PC.
    I seen Guest Access work on the older E4200v1's before so I know what it should look like.
    Can anyone suggest any likely reasons why my E4200v2 wouldn't be providing DHCP guest addresses in the 192.168.33.0 subnet?
    I only have 24 hrs until I have to deploy 2 new E4200v2's at a remote site, and after that it's going to be really hard to troubleshoot because I won't be at that site.
    Thanks in advance for any expert advice!
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    When you're in bridge mode DHCP server option goes away.  And I don't care if DHCP requests are getting to my Sonicwall b/c that device is not going to assign the Linksys Guest IP's... E4200 must do that, apparently in a totally hidden way.
    In any case, I don't have any more time to waste on E4200v2's so I'm going to try some E4200v1's which I just happen to have handy, thankfully.
    If Bridge Mode + Guest Access works better on the V1's then I'll retreat back to that older more obsolete hardware. 
    I'll report back later.
    (In meantime if anyone else cares to offer their knowledge experience about this, V2 or V1, I'm all ears)
    gv wrote:
    Do guests get an IP address if you enable the DHCP server?
    Do you see guest DHCP requests on your sonicwall?

  • Linksys WRT54G v5.1 "bridge mode" or "access point"

    Hello all.
    I have tried to find out how to activate something called "bridge mode" or "access point" and failed.
    Can anyone help me? I need to use the wireless router between another router and my computer.
    I hope you can help me.
    Thank you...
    Message Edited by Flowergun on 08-16-2007 12:18 PM

    Yes. That's correct. You also have to change the LAN IP address of the router to avoid address conflicts.
    For full description see here.

  • E4200 Bridged Mode - Wireless and Management fail after 36 hours

    Greetings all,
    I am trying to see if anybody else is having this problem.  I have the E4200 and have it configured in bridged mode.  Once configured, everything works great for 36 hours.
    After 36 hours, all wireless devices are unable to pull an IP address and the management IP address of the E4200 stops responding.  The only way to restore service is to reload the router.
    I took the first one back to Best Buy and they gave me a new one, however the new router has the same issue.
    It seems to me that after 36 hours, the E4200 fails to renew its management IP and also stops forwarding wireless broadcasts (DHCP) requests to my DHCP server.
    Thoughts?

    Thanks.  The new E4200 firmware has "bridged mode" so basically I just have this thing acting as a Wireless access point that has 5 Gigabit ethernet ports.
    This disables the routing engine in the E4200 and it acts as a wireless AP and switch.  The E4200's WAN port then connects to a Gigabit switch located in my telco closet, which is connected to my FiOS Router.
    Reason for this setup is so that devices connected to either the Gigabit switch, or to the E4200 via hardwire or wireless will all remain on the same subnet, and not cause the broadcasts to block as packets traverse subnets.

  • E4200 Bridge Mode

    Can someone please point out what I am doing wrong here.....
    I have my main router, a E4200v2 which I use as a router and it provides wireless signal throughout my house, however reception is not as strong on the upper floor and there is a slight dead spot, so I purchased an E4200 for the uppermost floor.
    I set the E4200 to bridge mode so it will act solely as an AP.
    However connecting the two routers LAN to LAN and the AP does not access the internet
    Setting a static IP for the router, instead of acquiring one via DHCP causes me to not be able to access the admin page on the AP.
    Connecting WAN on the E4200 to the LAN on the v2 does not work either.
    My goal here is to have my main router on 192.168.1.1 and the AP on 192.168.1.2 where I can access the admin settings for both routers in case I need to make changes.
    Can someone point me in the right direction here.....
    thanks,
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    There are two (2) ways to cascade a Linksys router to another router:
    1. LAN to LAN – Connecting one of the Ethernet ports (LAN ports) of the Linksys router (router A) to one of the Ethernet ports (LAN ports) of another router (router B).
    This type of cascading requires the main and the secondary routers to be on the same LAN IP segment to allow the computers and other devices to connect to both routers.  This configuration is recommended if you want to share files and resources within the network.
    2. LAN to WAN – Connecting one of the Ethernet ports (LAN ports) of router A to the Internet port (WAN port) of router B.
    This type of cascading requires the main router and the secondary router to have different IP addresses.  This connection makes it easier to identify which router the computers and other devices in the network are connected to since they will have different LAN IP segments.  However, computers that are connected to router A will not be able to communicate with router B, and vice versa since there are two (2) different networks.
    Here is the link for the same: http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=785463d9ecaf4cac84aed245b08d615f_3733.xml&pid=80&r...

  • Can a single Access Point support both bridge mode and Access Point mode at the same time

    Hi Guys
    Does anyone know which access point can work in both bridge mode and AP mode ?
    Cheers

    Well what are you trying to cover. If its really a large outdoor area, then look at the mesh AP. Those require a WLC. Autonomous or stand alone ap can perform bridging on one radio and client access on another. You can also look at AP that support indoor mesh that also controlled by a wlc. If your putting APs outdoors, then look at the outdoor mesh.
    Thanks,
    Scott Fella
    Sent from my iPhone

  • After Installing Oracle Virtual Box and changing the network adapter to bridged mode cant access my server

    Hi ,
    I have installed Oracle Virtual box on windows server 2008 r2 hosted on 1und1.de.
    Till installtion and setting up untun on virtualbox it was fine, but once i changed the adapater to bridged mode. I immediatly lost connectivity with my server and now cant access.
    It is now 2 days i cant access my server and neither ping it, also the website hosted on it is also down.
    The 1und1 has following 2 options
    1) using putty i can connect to server command prompt using administrator but cant run any gui application
    2) Server Rescue mode: where i get special environment to start, stop services, access registry and command prompt.
    Till now i have tried lot of setting to enable network connectivity but not able to success
    This is the result of Ipconfig /all
    Windows IP Configuration
       Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : s15453760
       Primary Dns Suffix  . . . . . . . :
       Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
       IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
       WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
    Ethernet adapter VirtualBox Host-Only Network:
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : VirtualBox Host-Only Ethernet Adapter
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 08-00-27-00-04-FD
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
       Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::5d5c:5bbc:c61:e9b1%16(Preferred)
       Autoconfiguration IPv4 Address. . : 169.254.233.177(Preferred)
       Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.0.0
       Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
       DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 352845863
       DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . : 00-01-00-01-15-B9-51-EA-00-19-99-A5-E7-BE
       DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : fec0:0:0:ffff::1%1
                                           fec0:0:0:ffff::2%1
                                           fec0:0:0:ffff::3%1
       NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    Tunnel adapter isatap.{BBF9AA14-45EA-460C-8F23-E106D890D878}:
       Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Tunnel adapter 6TO4 Adapter:
       Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft 6to4 Adapter
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 12:
       Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    How can i restore my connection.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    According to the result of "ipconfig /all", the physical adapter dosen't appear.
    Please check if the physical network adapter works properly. We can verify this in Device Manager.
    To open Device Manager by using the Windows interface
    Click Start, and then click Control Panel.
    Click Hardware and Sound.
    Click Device Manager.
    If the network adapter is working properly, please make sure that the Internet Protocol Version 4(TCP/IPv4) has been checked in the properties of the physical network adapter.
    If issue persists, please try to uninstall the Oracle Virtual box.
    Best Regards.
    Steven Lee
    TechNet Community Support

  • E4200 bridge mode question

    So, with the latest firmware update I could add a second e4200 to my network to use as a bridge or access point?  What I need is another device in my living room that can pick up the wireless signal and dish out network connectivity to my receiver, xbox360, and ps3.  With the new firmware update can this be done with a second e4200?
     How does one connect to each e4200 on the network for setup (dohave to change the default ip address of 1?)
    I just bought a trendnet TEW-687GA 450 mb/s wireless gaming adapter and a trendnet 5 port switch to accomplish what I mentioned above.  I'm just wondering if there is an advantage to switching over to two e4200's.  The trendnet adapater does not have a 5ghz channel.
    Thanks!

    The bridge feature doesn't support wireless bridging. It just dumbs it down to a switch and AP. So unless you flash it with a 3rd part firmware such as dd-wrt, what you are trying to accomplish will be impossible.
    I've heard multiple people say that 3rd party firmware for this router is buggy so I would either go with the trendnet and switch setup or the 5ghz capable Linksys WES610n. The 5ghz is ideal for for gaming and streaming media because of less interference compared to the 2.4ghz band. You'll more than likely be able to bond channels with the 5ghz network so that = more bandwidth. 
    I don't work for Cisco. I'm just here to help.

  • E4200 guest wireless redirect failure in Bridged Mode: cause & solution.

    Background:
    I have two E4200 v1 routers, both running the 1.0.04 firmware, both running in Bridged Mode.
    On one, guest wireless redirect works perfectly: select the Network-guest SSID, open a browser and you get the Cisco login page, enter the passphrase and bingo, you're connected.
    On the other unit, the redirect seems to fail. You are never presented with the login page and so, you are never connected.
    After hours of mucking about, including some time on the phone with a very patient engineer, I believe I have stumbled on what's actually going on and possibly, what needs to be done to fix it.
    The Problem
    The firmware assumes that in Bridged Mode, DNS should come from the Gateway IP address.
    The Fix
    Linksys should include a field in Bridged Mode that allows you to specify an IP for the DNS server.
    Diagnostics
    To diagnose the problem, I used a Mac OS X machine.
    The network is set up like this:
    Router (not the E4200) is at 10.0.0.1
    DNS server is at 10.0.0.2
    E4200, Bridged Mode as a WAP, is at 10.0.0.253.
    E4200's network settings are:
    IP: 10.0.0.253
    Subnet: 255.255.255.0
    Gateway: 10.0.0.1
    The problem is that the Linksys firmware assumes that DNS and the gateway are at the same IP. You will note that there is no place in the Bridged Mode settings to specify a DNS server IP address.  You can prove this by doing the following:
    1. Connect to the guest wireless. 
    2. In a Terminal window, type cat /etc/resolv.conf and press Enter.  You'll see this:
    nameserver 10.0.0.1
    nameserver 192.168.33.1
    This tells us that when you're on the guest network, your machine is looking for DNS results from 10.0.0.1. Except that on many networks, the gateway does not supply DNS. You can prove that DNS is working by typing this into a Terminal window:
    dig yahoo.com
    You should see a result similar to this:
    ; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R4-P3 <<>> yahoo.com
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 45182
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 13, ADDITIONAL: 13
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;yahoo.com.            IN    A
    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    yahoo.com.        3063    IN    A    209.191.122.70
    yahoo.com.        3063    IN    A    72.30.38.140
    yahoo.com.        3063    IN    A    98.139.183.24
    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
    .            24651    IN    NS    a.root-servers.net.
    .            24651    IN    NS    j.root-servers.net.
    .            24651    IN    NS    l.root-servers.net.
    .            24651    IN    NS    c.root-servers.net.
    .            24651    IN    NS    e.root-servers.net.
    .            24651    IN    NS    d.root-servers.net.
    .            24651    IN    NS    f.root-servers.net.
    .            24651    IN    NS    m.root-servers.net.
    .            24651    IN    NS    g.root-servers.net.
    .            24651    IN    NS    b.root-servers.net.
    .            24651    IN    NS    i.root-servers.net.
    .            24651    IN    NS    h.root-servers.net.
    .            24651    IN    NS    k.root-servers.net.
    ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
    a.root-servers.net.    24651    IN    A    198.41.0.4
    b.root-servers.net.    24651    IN    A    192.228.79.201
    c.root-servers.net.    24651    IN    A    192.33.4.12
    d.root-servers.net.    24651    IN    A    128.8.10.90
    e.root-servers.net.    24651    IN    A    192.203.230.10
    f.root-servers.net.    24651    IN    A    192.5.5.241
    g.root-servers.net.    24651    IN    A    192.112.36.4
    h. root-servers.net.    24651    IN    A    128.63.2.53
    i.root-servers.net.    24651    IN    A    192.36.148.17
    j.root-servers.net.    24651    IN    A    192.58.128.30
    k.root-servers.net.    24651    IN    A    193.0.14.129
    l.root-servers.net.    24651    IN    A    199.7.83.42
    m.root-servers.net.    24651    IN    A    202.12.27.33
    ;; Query time: 73 msec
    ;; SERVER: 10.0.0.1#53(10.0.0.1)
    ;; WHEN: Thu Apr  5 10:51:02 2012
    ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 494
    Note the section at the bottom that says ;; SERVER: 10.0.0.1#53(10.0.0.1). This tells you that the DNS query was answered by the DNS server at 10.0.0.1.
    But in fact, if DNS is NOT served by your Gateway, you'll see this:
    dig yahoo.com
    ; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R4-P3 <<>> @10.0.0.1 yahoo.com
    ; (1 server found)
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
    Lucky:~ aball$
    As a side note: the reason that the login page is never presented is most likely that the login page is only presented the first time that your Mac OS X machine connects to the network. Thereafter, the network is remembered and the WAP allows you access without a password. So, once you've connected a second time to the network, the WAP says "I know you" and lets you sail on through to wherever your browser is pointed, but then the browser, unable to find a DNS server, returns a blank page which appears to be a failure to present the login page but is, in fact, a DNS failure.
    Hope someone finds this useful. And here's hoping that Linksys fixes this obvious issue with the firmware.

    I do understand what you were trying to do here since you would like to have only 2 SSIDs (main & guest) for perhaps easy connectivity. The reason why you were not having problems getting online wirelessly when you were connected to the main network it’s because the computer was connected to only one DHCP server since the 2 bridge routers were just acting as a switch or a passthrough device. Now with guest network access it is a different scenario, a guest network is a virtual network meaning to say it’s like your having another router embedded on your router. Since it is a virtual network, then it does not follow the parameters of the main network, hence even if the router was set to bridge mode those routers will still have their own ip address of either 192.168.33.1 or 192.168.3.1.

  • ML wifi dropping fixed by no double NAT on APE, but no guest network in no NAT bridge mode.

    ML wifi connections drop on Airport Extreme with dual NAT
    I have a 2011 MBP, and a 2010 Airport Extreme.  Ever since installing Mountain Lion, the MBP constantly drops wifi connection to the Airport Extreme.  It doesn't drop wifi connection at the coffee shop. 
    Fixed by bridge mode
    So I started the AirPort Utility.  It informed me the AirPort Extreme (APE) has dual NAT, because the cable modem has NAT, and to change the APE to bridge mode.  I did that.  It fixed it!  No dropped wifi.  However, a few hours later, my neighbors came and told me the guest network is gone!  So it fixed it for me, but broke my neighbor's connection.  So I switched the APE back to NAT.  Now my neighbor has wifi but my ML wifi connection is now dropping all the time.
    No guest network in bridge mode
    The APE doesn't have a guest network in bridge mode:  http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r25840392-airport-extreme-bridge-mode-guest-conn ect

    Linc, I agree it shouldn't work in bridge mode.  I don't like that the Cable ISP is using NAT, but it is.  All of these devices attached to my Airport Express are working.
    From Aiport Utility:
         10.53.64.1     Internet router address
         10.53.73.8        Airport Express
    From System Preferences, Screen Sharing:
         10.53.65.66     MacBook Pro
         10.53.65.65     MacMini (ethernet connected)
                               Neighbor's Playstation (ethernet connected)
                               Neigbhors Windows laptop (wifi connected)
    From iPod Touch (http://techtips.salon.com/ipod-touch-ip-address-4209.html):
         10.53.65.153   iPod Touch 4th gen
         10.53.65.67     iPod Touch 3rd gen
    Traceroute (both with and without the AE) shows the first two hops identical private IP addresses.  So the AE is definitely in bridge mode, not routing.  The ISP is giving me a private IP address.
    Traceroute with Airport Extreme
    traceroute www.apple.com
    traceroute to e3191.c.akamaiedge.net (96.16.21.15), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
    1  10.53.0.1 (10.53.0.1) 8.123 ms  7.218 ms  8.513 ms
    2  10.0.52.62 (10.0.52.62)  7.651 ms  8.257 ms  7.388 ms
    3  static.customer-201-116-nnn-nnn.uninet-ide.com.mx (201.116.nnn.nnn)  13.757 ms  8.553 ms  10.440 ms
    4  inet-bcs-snjosecabo-11-s4-2-0.uninet.net.mx (187.130.146.154)  15.486 ms  10.052 ms  10.098 ms
    5  bb-la-grand-4-pos0-4-2-0.uninet.net.mx (201.125.19.38)  42.289 ms  42.592 ms  42.945 ms
    6  12.89.4.5 (12.89.4.5)  43.300 ms  41.532 ms  42.443 ms
    ^C
    Traceroute from computer plugged directly into Cable Modem. with wifi turned off
    traceroute www.apple.com
    traceroute to e3191.c.akamaiedge.net (96.16.21.15), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
    1  10.53.0.1 (10.53.0.1)  6.881 ms  7.050 ms  7.557 ms
    2  static.customer-201-116-nnn-nnn.uninet-ide.com.mx (201.116.nnn.nnn)  9.341 ms
        10.0.52.62 (10.0.52.62)  7.090 ms
        static.customer-201-116-nnn-nnn.uninet-ide.com.mx (201.116.nnn.nnn)  9.106 ms
    From the Cisco thread: 
    "3. Apr 10, 2010 2:43 AM (in response to chemilio)
    Re: Traceroute output: What is the first hop ip?
    It may depend on how the ISP do their network infrastructure.  I've seen internal IP addresses in the first few hops of a Cable ISP but I can't remember whether was it the 1st hop or 2nd hop onwards.
    9. May 17, 2011 1:33 PM (in response to chemilio)
    Re: Traceroute output: What is the first hop ip?
    Most ISPs use private RFC1918 IP address schemes for their private network. They effectively treat your street as a LAN, then perform NAT/PAT on your behalf at their CO. This means they can translate onto the public IPv4 or IPv6 internet and take a lot more control over the traffic generated by your network/PC"
    https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/12254
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network

  • E4200/E3200 in bridge mode...Guest access works, but does not roam between routers...any ideas?

    I have installed wireless in my church...main router is E4200 in the office set up as follows:
    IP: 192.168.0.1
    Subnet: 255.255.255.0
    DHCP enabled (Range = 192.168.0.4-192.168.0.103)
    Guest network enabled
    Static DNS (for content filtering)
    NAT: Enabled
    Second router E3200 (in bridge mode) - connected LAN to WAN
    IP: 192.168.0.2
    Subnet: 255.255.255.0
    Guest Network enabled
    DHCP (obviously disabled)
    Static DNS (for content filtering)
    NAT: Enabled
    Third router E3200 (in bridge mode) - Connected LAN to WAN
    IP 192.168.0.3
    Subnet: 255.255.255.0
    Guest network enabled
    DHCP (obviously disabled)
    Static DNS (for content filtering)
    NAT: Enabled
    The 2 routers in Bridge mode are connected to a 16-port unmanaged switch (with other PCs, etc.), which is then plugged into the main router in Port 1.
    SSIDs on all 3 routers are exactly the same for both main and Guest networks.
    The main network works flawlessly.  The router in the office hands out IPs in the 192.168.0.XX range and you can wander throughout the church and maintain a persistent Internet connection.  File and print access works fine too from anywhere in the building.
    For the Guest network, you can set up a laptop next to each router, obtain an IP address, reach the logon page and surf the Internet without issue.  So, the Guest Network works fine from each router.
    However, if you wander around the church while on the Guest network (such as with a smart phone), the following happens:
    -On either of the E3200 routers (in bridge mode) you get the login page as you wander into the range of each router.  I would have thought that if you logged in once, you would be good to go.
    -You get a different IP from each router.  On the E3200's in Bridge mode, you get a 192.168.33.XX address.  Additionally, the gateway is 192.168.33.1.  On the E4200 (main router) you get a 192.168.3.XX IP and a gateway of 192.168.3.1.  
    -As a result of getting different IPs, the smart phone becomes confused and generally won't connect to the Internet.
    So, it looks like each router maintains a separate list of who has entered the correct password to get onto the Guest network.  Additionally, it appears as if each of the 2 routers, supposedly in Bridge mode, is still handing out IP addresses on the Guest Network, rather than deferring to the router in the office like they do for the main network.
    I have seen a lot of postings about how to put routers into Bridge mode and problems with the Guest Network, but posts that I've seen point to the Guest network not working at all, as opposed to this issue where it works; the bridged routers, though, continue to like to hand out IP addresses on it, making wandering around the church while connected to the Internet not possible while connected to the Guest network.
    Anyone else experience as similar situation?  Any possible solutions out there?
    Thanks!
    -Gil
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I do understand what you were trying to do here since you would like to have only 2 SSIDs (main & guest) for perhaps easy connectivity. The reason why you were not having problems getting online wirelessly when you were connected to the main network it’s because the computer was connected to only one DHCP server since the 2 bridge routers were just acting as a switch or a passthrough device. Now with guest network access it is a different scenario, a guest network is a virtual network meaning to say it’s like your having another router embedded on your router. Since it is a virtual network, then it does not follow the parameters of the main network, hence even if the router was set to bridge mode those routers will still have their own ip address of either 192.168.33.1 or 192.168.3.1.

  • Can I use multiple E4200's in bridge mode, to enable a "guest wifi' mesh?

    I have four E4200 units on my network, each with an unique IP address, in bridge mode to act as a wireless mesh across my entire building.   They are all connected to my central L3 switch, via their Internet ports.
    Is it possible to enable the Guest network on each unit, to create a 'Guest Wifi' mesh (providing that I allow the 192.168.33.0 network to route across my network fabric), or will this not work because each indivudual AP will be assigning IP address 192.168.33.1 as it's gateway address meaning that I would have four distinct MAC addresses within the network, each trying to claim that they are IP 192.168.33.1?

    As soon as you enable guest access on the router, it will start providing the IP address 192.168.33.x to the clients connecting to the guest network and we cannot change the IP address range of guest network.
    Since you have 4 units (E4200), you can enable guest wi-fi of each of them however cannot create a guest wi-fi mesh as all the 4 units have different IP address.

  • How can I set up a guest access point with a Time Capsule and an Airport Extreme? I am using a Telus router with the Time Capsule used as a wireless access point (bridge mode). I don't want the guest access point to have access to my network.

    How can I set up a guest access point with a Time Capsule and an Airport Extreme? I am using a Telus router with the Time Capsule used as a wireless access point (bridge mode). I don't want the guest access point to have access to my network.

    The Guest Network function of the Time Capsule and AirPort Extreme cannot be enabled when the device is in Bridge Mode. Unfortunately, with another router...the Telus...upstream on your network, Bridge Mode is indicated as the correct setting for all other routers on the network.
    If you can replace the Telus gateway with a simple modem (that performs no routing functions), you should be able to configure either the Time Capsule or the AirPort Extreme....whichever is connected to the modem....to provide a Guest Network.

  • Guest access in bridge mode

    I want to set up a secure wireless network in our small office that will also allow clients to access the internet while in our waiting area. I also want to maintain our current wired network, which is connected to the internet through a Nortel router, connected to a DSL modem. Where would the Airport extreme be installed? - i.e., upstream or downstream from the router? Also, looking over Apple's network documentation, it appears that the Airport Extreme would be in Bridge mode when configured on an existing ethernet network with router, but the documentation is clear on the issue of setting up guest access in this kind of configuration.
    In case you have not guessed, I am not an IT guy, so will be grateful for any helpful suggestions

    Blind Lemon wrote:
    I want to set up a secure wireless network in our small office that will also allow clients to access the internet while in our waiting area. I also want to maintain our current wired network, which is connected to the internet through a Nortel router, connected to a DSL modem. Where would the Airport extreme be installed? - i.e., upstream or downstream from the router? Also, looking over Apple's network documentation, it appears that the Airport Extreme would be in Bridge mode when configured on an existing ethernet network with router, but the documentation is clear on the issue of setting up guest access in this kind of configuration.
    Guest access and bridge mode are incompatible on AirPort base stations. I'd connect an AirPort Extreme to your DSL modem, connect your wired network connections to the Ethernet ports of the AirPort Extreme, and take the Nortel router out of service. Depending on how many wired connections you need, you may also need an Ethernet switch. Besides the WAN port, an AirPort Extreme only has three available Ethernet ports.

  • E4200 as a Access Point/Bridge Mode

    I have spent most of the weekend trying to get this router to act as a proper Access Point.
    Has any got this to work correctly?
    When it does work (Stay connected) speeds and latency are rotten. If I go back to Routing Mode this thing kicks butt, but I isolate all devices attached to a different subnet and trying to set up proper routes has proved imposable.
    Firmware 1.0.2 r 13
    The online help stated to connect to the "internet interface" when in Bridge Mode DHCP Server Is not broadcasting to on the wireless or wired interfaces.
    If I used the wired interface as the uplink I can broadcast the DHCP to any device on wired but again nothing to the Wireless.
    When I "Show Routing Table" I see two static routes pointing to the ATT router for the Wired/Wireless Interfaces.....
    0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 (my Gateway) Wired/Wireless
    (my Gateway) 255.255.255.0 0.0.0. Wired/Wireless
    Why?? 
    AP mode should only be working in Broadcast.
    By connecting the Wired Interfaces alone up to my switched network should not use the router at all.
    If you force all traffic to my router all traffic has to be inspected by the firewall
    You create a bottleneck my router interface is 10/100.
    ATT 2 Wire Gateway/Router with pinholes. 10/100/1000 Non managed 24 port Switch Network. Server infrastructure serving DNS/DHCP.
    I decided to buy this after reading it offered Bridge/Access Point mode instead of getting the WAP610 because I wanted to have the option to change to routing mode or AP mode.
    Since my ATT Uverse Router Wireless is “g” it takes forever to transfer files to and from my servers.

    OK If this helps... I am running a SOHO
    2Wire DSL Router with DHCP Off  Assigned 192.168.100.1 as the Router Gateway IP. NAT Enabled All firewall is being handled via 2Wire. Currently 2Wire WiFi is disabled. For the Linksys E4200
    2wire 10/100 interface up-linked into my d-link 24 port 10/100/1000 Layer 2 unmanaged switch.
    DHCP and DNS Servers on d-link switch
    VOIP on d-link switch
    Testing Results WAN Interface Bridge
    E4200 up-linked via 10/100/1000 Internet Interface to d-link network switch.
    E4200 Internet Interface DHCP assigned using MAC Reserved DHCP 192.168.100.22.
    E4200 in Bridge Mode
    Devices connected to 4X E4200 Gig Ports do not receive DHCP broadcast IP Address
    Device Connected to E4200 WiFi do not receive DHCP BroadcastIP Address
    Assign Static IP to my laptop WiFi in the 192.168.100.X range will establish communication but HUGE latency and poor speeds for any traffic internet or internally to any of my servers.
    At times the connection gets lost.
    In this configuration I get the above stated Route Tables.
    If this is layer 2 compliant it should be handing all local subnet traffic via MAC instead of routing.
    I have not taken the time to attempt to reconfigure my 2Wire to go into DMZ Plus mode and allow the linksys to handle all routing,  but from previous attempt with my wrt54 it did not go well. I accepted the slow 2Wire WiFi speeds.
    It is now getting to the point I am looking for better WiFi to local LAN speeds , I also am looking to do Layer 2 and bypass Routing if I can.
    The WAP160 has a 10/100 interface. I prefer gig

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is Location supposed to work on iPADs that don't come with Cellular capabilities?

    Using the new iPAD mini 3, without Cellular - I have been unable to get MAPS to show my location. I get a popup window which says "CANNOT DETERMINE LOCATION" I very carefully went through every possible settings to allow LOCATION to System Services,

  • My iTunes no longer copies my Contacts to my iPod when I have the 'info' box ticked?

    I used to have my Contacts copied onto my iPod classic until recently.     Now iTunes now longer seems to want to do this for me, and i get the following messsage "iTunes will no longer sync contacts to the iPod" without any other help or explanation

  • Streaming music using Bluetooth breaks up on new 4th gen. ITouch

    I recently bought a new iTouch 4 and now have trouble streaming music using Bluetooth...this did not happen with my older device, also 4G...any type of physical interference, walking between iPod and Bluetooth receiver causes a loss of sound...I have

  • "rescue and recovery" and "swshare" log question

    I am currently analzying logs from "rescue and recovery" and "swshare" program and notice SMA.log and capture.sma in particular. I want to verifiy what do each of those 2 logs mean. does one mean the data that was successfully backed up and the other

  • HT1338 ibooks for my mac book pro

    I have purchased books to read through the ibooks on my phone.  I pay for icloud so I thought that would enable me to have all the data shared between my apple products. I would now like to read on my mac computer instead of my Iphone.  The Iphone sc