E4200 - Runs half the speed compared to my old router

That may have solved one problem but try this one. Why does my E4200 seem to run less than half as fast as my old WRT310N?

No doubt, the router E4200 is among the excellent routers. I would like to ask few question before I suggest you for any troubleshooting steps. The speed issue that you are facing, that is with the wired connection or with the wireless connection?
If you are getting the concern with both wired and wireless connection then you can try the following settings..
A] With the help of Cisco Connect Software (if at all you have installed the router with the help of this software)
          1] Open the software and go to the option which says "Router Settings"
          2] Then click on the option which says "Advanced Settings" which will take you to the router's configuration page.
         3] Lower the MTU (Maximum Transmission Unit) from 1500 to 1400 or less (usually found on your router's main/ basic setup page)
         4] Then go to the Wireless tab, keep network mode as mixed,
 For Channel Settings of 2.4 GHz you can make Channel Width to 20 MHz only and Channel to 6, 9, 11..
 For Channel Settings of 5 GHz you can make Channel Width to 20 MHz only and Channel to 40 or 161...
B] If you haven't installed Cisco Connect then you can log on to the router's user interface using it's default IP address in the browser which is 192.168.1.1 and type in 'admin' as the password leaving the username field blank. This will take you to the router's web interface and then follow steps as mentioned above to make the changes.

Similar Messages

  • Can I change the tempo of a section one track in Garageband 10? For example I would like a drum track to be half the speed of the overall tempo for 4 bars. Is this possible? Thanks.

    Can I change the tempo of a section one track in Garageband 10? For example I would like a drum track to be half the speed of the overall tempo for 4 bars. Is this possible? Thanks.

    Can I change the tempo of a section one track in Garageband 10? For example I would like a drum track to be half the speed of the overall tempo for 4 bars. Is this possible? Thanks.

  • Half the speed on Samsung EVO 850 SSD

    I just installed a Samsung EVO 850 500GB SSD in my mid-2010 iMac with 27" monitor and 2.93GHz i7 processor.  According to Blackmagic Disk Speed Test, I am only getting 255MB/s read and write speeds when the SSD is advertised as 2x this fast.  Why am I only getting half the R/W speeds.  Running the latest version of Yosemite.

    I may have just discovered my own answer.    My 2010 iMac I believe has a SATA II controller which operates at 3Gb/sec unlike SATA III which does 6Gb/sec.   Is that the answer? 

  • Less than half the Speed! CS: "its fine"

    So i moved from virgin media to bt hoping that it would improve my broadband expierience.now i say to my self haha what a joke!
    Well than i was intially estimated to get around 35mb dl - 10mb+ uploads when signing up in april, i remember that while ordering online. So i Got my services installed on 1st of May and while the engineer was present at my property running speedtest i was getting 36mb dwn and around 13mb up and low pings! Was well satisfied with that and he left. Soon that evening very same day my speeds dropped to about 14mb and it was like that till 6-7 days into DLM period but after phone call to bt cs they somehow got it upto around 22mbish.
    Then i upgraded to infinity 2 even after considering the problems with this upgrade atm, well nothing to lose anyway not having great speeds in start.
    I was estimated this:
    yea thats right 61mb dl - 20mb up, my order compleated on 9th of May and i have seen absolutly no change in my connection whatsoever!
    I called up bt earlier today and the CS from abroad told me its fine sir!! this is within our estimated level and our record show this is the speed you would be recieving from us!.
    what a joke of product.

    Well i gave bt another call yesterday on 11th of may, spoke to someone in uk and they ran all the basic check everything but no good results, so he booked a engineer visit for 12th (today). Guess what? No one turned up hahahah, Thats bt for you, so followed up with another call in evening raging about this and someone now told me there is a network fault in my exchange (hayes north) and the problem is supposed to be fixed on monday followed by engineer visit on monday aswell at my property to check if everything is fine.
    Lets see what happens on monday then

  • Why is the SSD on 2011 Macbook Air much slower then 2010 Macbook Pro with Samsung 830 SSD (less then half the speed) ?

    Why is a laptop designed from ground up to use flash slower then a older laptop with a upgraded SSD from a 3rd party?
    My old MBP is more then 2x the speed (read/write) with a SSD upgrade (Samsung 830) then my Air.
    Any fixes or mods to boost the flash speed of the Air?

    We would like you to show us how to do that.......Especially when the Samsung 830 will not fit the Air.....Please don't say duct tape....
    Ok, scratch that idea.  Let me think for a moment,,,em,,,em.  OK I got it.  Sell both units and buy a mid Macbook Air 2012 version.  
    (d-mn I'm good)
    __________ All Hail The King _________

  • BT infinity installation - half the speed of the e...

    After a long, long wait I was very pleased to see that Infinity was finally available in my area (from about 2 weeks ago), so I ordered it pretty much the moment I had a chance to do so. The estimate from BT's availability checker for FTTC was up to 51.7mbps down and up to 13.2 mbps up - somewhat better than I was getting on ADSL (<2mbps down and 200kbps up..).
    On the day of the installation we requested that the modem & router be placed in our study, as the master socket is in the hallway and has no power nearby (we had previously run everything from an extension socket in the study). The contractor (not a BT engineer) decided that the current wiring was suitable, and so didn't make any changes to the master socket or to our internal wiring - pretty much just plugged things in and was on his way again, telling us that our speed should be stable within 10 days or so.
    It's now been a week since the installation, and we are still achieving less than half of what BT's estimate suggested we should be getting.
    BT speed tester diagnostics:
    Download Speed
    22.72 Mbps
    0 Mbps
    23.52 Mbps
    Max Achievable Speed
     Download speedachieved during the test was - 22.72 Mbps
     For your connection, the acceptable range of speedsis 16 Mbps-23.52 Mbps .
     Additional Information:
     IP Profile for your line is - 23.52 Mbps
    2. Upstream Test: -provides background information.
    Upload Speed
    8.23 Mbps
    0 Mbps
    20 Mbps
    Max Achievable Speed
    Upload speed achieved during the test was - 8.23Mbps
     Additional Information:
     Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 20 Mbps
    This is on an ethernet connection, not wireless.
    Is there anything that we could try to increase the download speed, or is our line likely just awful? Don't get me wrong, I'm very pleased to be receiving 10 times what I was on ADSL, but I was hoping for more.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Sorry, popped out for dinner and get my new phone.
    You will need to contact the moderators, they will take personal ownership over your case until resolved.
    You can contact them here, they will take 3 working days to respond.
    Please keep us updated, also when they send the engineer out. Make sure you request a DLM reset of your line!
    If this helped you please click the Star beside my name.
    If this answered your question please click "Mark as Accepted Solution" below.

  • BB line speed is now half the speed since moving t...

    I would like to know why the line speed is now 0.77MB when it was more than 1.7MB when I started with BT.
    We used to be able to watch films on ipad without problems but now this is not possible unless you want ro watch it minimised which is not acceptable.
    I can't understand why BT thinks a line speed of 0.77MB is categorised as "good". This is NOT good.
    Please help!

    welcome to the BT community forum where customers help customers and only BT employees are the forum mods
    in order for the forum members to help please can you post the adsl stats from your router may need to 'show detail' to get all stats (if hub enter 192.168.1.254 in your browser and navigate to adsl or use a-z, if netgear enter 192.168.0.1) and run  btspeedtester  (MAC users may have problems). when first test completes then run diagnostic test and post the results .
    are you connected directly via a filter to the NTE5 master or test socket or to somewhere else? Is the master the only phone socket in your home?
    Have you tried the quiet line test? - dial 17070 option 2 - should hear nothing - best done with a corded phone. if cordless phone you may hear a 'dull hum' which is normal
    Someone may then be able to offer help/assistance/suggestions to your problem
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • FTTC less than half the speed of neighbour who's f...

    Before migrating to FTTC, I was getting 6.9Mbps and occasional dropouts.  My neighbour was getting 3Mbps.
    After migration to FTTC, my neighbour is getting  14.4mbps. I'm getting 6.0Mbps - slower than the previous standard ADSL to the exchange...
    So far, BT are resisting fixing my problem. The cause seems obvious; my neighbour's line runs overhead to the cabinet, in a modern/copper cable bundle. My line runs underground in an old/aluminium bundle.
    I suspect that my neighbour was switched from the underground cable to the overhead cable when he moved to BT Infinity 2; his estimated speed (during the negotiations) was 14.0Mbps. This shows that BT are aware that 14.0Mbps is achievable in our location.
    Meanwhile, 40 yards closer to the exchange, I'm languishing on the aluminium bundle at 6.0Mbps. Might this be because I'm on a 3rd party ISP? They are complaining to BT, but BT is refusing to move my line.
    Is this reasonable? I thought ADSL service providers were obligated to provide the fastest ADSL possible given the local circumstances? 
    Incidentally, I'm on the same cabinet as my neighbour, and I'm in port #1, the implication being that I probably migrated to FTTC before my neighbour.

    when installing FTTC the existing phone cable from your home to the cabinet is used and then it is fibre to the cab from exchange.  There is no changing the line.
    It is opnereach that are responsible for the installation of fibre and there is nothing our ISP BT Retail can do to help you.  you need to pursue your problem with your own ISP who in turn will contact openreach
    openreach have made it clear many time that they will not change your line to another just to improve your broadband connection - need to show there is a fault which requires engineer visit
    Sorry but you need to get your ISP involved
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • I have Comcast internet, my roommates PC (with viruses) runs at the speed of light while my iMac struggles.  My iMac worked fine on other internet connections before we got our own internet.  I've reset the modem, cleaned my Mac, still nothing helps!

    As my title states, the PC works super fast and mine struggles.  We have $75 internet which goes to say that our internet is mega fast.  Before we got our personal modem, we were sniping other peoples internet in our apartment complex.  Even with a few bars of internet from AirPort, it was going faster than our internet now.  I've reset the modem, I've inserted DNS's, I've cleaned my Mac, everything I can think of.  I need help.  I called Comcast and they said it was my iMac.  I just bought this iMac in October.  It's still new to me.  Comcast says it's my iMac but I do not believe them.  My iMac runs fast, until I try to use the internet, so I know it's somehting with the internet.  Please help, it's making me regret spending $1300 on a computer

    I have asked a moderator to provide assistance, they will post an invite on this thread.
    Once you get a reply, if you click on their name, you will see a screen like this. Click on the link as shown below.
    Please do not send them a personal message, as they may not be on duty for a long time, and your message will not be tracked properly.
    There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
    BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

  • Wireless half the speed of WIRED

    Is this common?
    Ran a test on speedtest.net via ethernet and I got 9.8 MBPS and via wireless it is 4.28 MBPS
    I am using a WRT160N Version 1  Router
    My wireless card is a G and my ISP claims 10 Mbps transfer rates.

    No,it is not common.Yiu can check for the firewall and turned it off on the wireless computer.As your wireless computer is using a G-Series card,so it could be the one reason.On the linksys setup page you may try by changing the Network Mode to "mixed" or "BG-Mixed" .
    If the above step doesn't resolve your problem then,try to upgrade the router's firmware.Firmware is available here.

  • Why is my 8gb ram macbook is slow when using the internet compared to my old laptop?

    i just purchased my macbook last week and i've noticed that using the internet has been quite bad at home. It seems to run pretty fast when using my schools wifi however it just doesn't make sense that my old laptop would still run faster than my new 8gb ram macbook. My internet plan is with telstra -50gb ADSL modem and it promises speeds up to 20 mbps and i'm only getting 4.11 mbps...

    Hold down the option key and select the Wi-Fi menu in the menu bar. What values are shown for the following?
    PHY Mode
    Channel
    Security
    RSSI
    Transmit Rate

  • Mac mini running generals painfully slow compared to ibook...

    hi, i have a new mac mini 1.5 solo core with 1gb of ram. Also running it with a 19"monitor. The game seems to run painfully slow when compared to my old ibook with a 1.33ghz processor and 1gb of ram.
    thanks

    Hi
    Unfortunately your report is correct, depending on the game used, which name you don't give : if it's not Universal Binary , the mac runs it through Rosetta (powerpc emulator) resulting in -comparatively- poor performance...That, plus the fact that the ibook doesn't have to cope with shared memory for its graphic card...So in this situation, the theoretical advantage of the new mini on your previous configuration vanishes !

  • HT1270 I own a MacBook Pro 13 inch [dec 2009] 4gb ram. I'm upgrading it to 8gb. Can I increase the speed of the ram from 1066 to 1333 Mhz..?.

    I own a MacBook Pro 13 inch [dec 2009] 4gb ram. I'm upgrading it to 8gb. Can I increase the speed of the ram from 1066 to 1333 Mhz..?
    Which is the best company and is it necessary to buy it from the Apple store.

    Let's clear the air here between fact and fiction.
    Brand of RAM has little if anything to do with its quality.
    A reliable vendor is more important that brand of RAM.
    Installing faster rated RAM than required for your computer doesn't result in a faster computer. The RAM still runs at the speed of the system's memory bus.
    Installing slower rated RAM than required for your computer will make the computer run slower.
    Using faster rated RAM is a tricky business. Sometimes it will work and sometimes it will not work. This may be due to other factors related to your computer's memory bus speed and clock speed as well as other characteristics of the RAM such as CAS Latency (CL.)
    The reliable thing to do is use RAM that meets the specifications set for your computer. That information is found in either the user manual or the system specs.

  • How do I compare the speed of my new MacBook Pro to my old one?

    I recently purchased a new MacBook Pro (2.6 Ghz Intel Core i7, 8 GB 1600 Mhz DDR3) and gave my old one to my daughter. I used Time Machine to basically produce an exact copy of the old machine; however, in the six weeks I've been using it, I don't seem to see any improvements in speed eg programmes which took several seconds to open still take several seconds to open (I know - learn to be a bit more patient!).
    Is there a simple way of comparing two machines? Are there any ways the general public can "benchmark" different computers to allow a direct comparison?

    Drewsey_woosey wrote:
    I recently purchased a new MacBook Pro (2.6 Ghz Intel Core i7, 8 GB 1600 Mhz DDR3) and gave my old one to my daughter. I used Time Machine to basically produce an exact copy of the old machine; however, in the six weeks I've been using it, I don't seem to see any improvements in speed eg programmes which took several seconds to open still take several seconds to open (I know - learn to be a bit more patient!).
    Is there a simple way of comparing two machines? Are there any ways the general public can "benchmark" different computers to allow a direct comparison?
    You might have gotten a newer machine, which is surely faster performing on the hardware side if you run GeekBench, XBench and other tests for CPU, Graphics and UI responses. 
    However some hardware speeds haven't changed too much, like hard drives which Apple places pokey 5,400 RPM drives in their laptop because it's more stable and takes less power.
    Apple likes to add features to OS X to sell more hardware, this "bloat" tends to eat away at the hardware performance you do get when you buy a new machine.
    Apple very well can make the UI feel more snappy, however they put speed limits in as they want people to be able to recognize something is happening.
    Another factor is you restored from TimeMachine, which doesn't really optimize the hard drive when it restores back.
    Another factor is a lot of hard drives come from the factor with bad sectors, which takes time for the drive to discover and map off, this affects read performance.
    Another factor is perhaps you bought a 13" MBP, with no dedicated graphics card, so it's running on the Intel CPU 4000 graphics which is greatly inferior to the higher end 15" dedicated graphics.
    Another factor is when you restored from TimeMachine your personal data pushed past the 50% mark on your boot hard drive, these sectors and tracks on the hard drive are shorter and further inwards thus it takes longer for the read heads to get data from them.
    I don't have to recommned any program for you to test your new hardware against the old one, I know your new machine is probablly faster.
    What I suspect has occured is your machine either doesn't have a dedicated video card (a 13", cant' help about that)
    or that your running 10.7 (you CAN upgrade to 10.8 which reports are it's a bit snappier)
    Does your Mac qualify for free 10.8 upgrade?
    I suspect you dont't have a SSD or else you wouldn't be complaining, so that leaves a boot hard drive over 50% filled and/or a deoptimized TimeMachine restore.
    What you can do is get a blank, powered external drive and a copy of Carbon Copy Cloner
    1: Reduce the content of your boot drive user data so Acitivty Monitor > Disk Usage is below 50% (never more than 80% filled) reboot to see the changes.
    2: Use CCC to clone the Macintosh HD partition to the external drive, hold the option key down while booting and boot off the clone drive.
    3: Use Disk Utility (on the clone) to select your Macintosh HD partiton on the internal drive, use the Erase > Secure Erase middle selection and wait, this will "zero" the drive and ehen it checks, will map off any bad or failing sectors.
    4: When that's completed (takes a few hours) then use CCC to clone the clone back onto the Macintosh HD partition.
    5: Reboot and Disk Utility > Repair permissions on both drives, use OnyX from MacUpdate.com to run all the maintainence and cleaning aspects and reboot.
    For the OnyX routine, see #12 here: Step by Step to fix your Mac
    What you should wind up with is a as snappy machine as possible, your Applications will be written to the "hot band" which is the fastest portion of the hard drive, hopefully any bad sectors which take longer to read from will be eliminated.
    If you want to make hardware changes, I recommned getting a Solid State Drive for faster speed, however they can't be securely erased and Filevault has been cracked so that's no protection.
    http://eshop.macsales.com/installvideos/
    FYI I have a pokey 5,400 RPM drive, butI used the optimization techniques above and it's dam well snappy. I also run 10.6.8 on a Early 2011, which is the last machines that can run 10.6., so because the OS is less bloated I get more UI response.
    Other factos I have, I have a 25 Mb/p download Internet speed and a 5Ghz WPA2(AES) ruoter with no leachers or other users. I use Firefox with the broadband tweaks which is even faster than Safari which is the fasest browser on Macs. My web pages lad in about 1-2 seconds onaverage.

  • How do i get the CPU to run at full speed steadily?

    how may I get the S10's CPU to run at the full speed (near 1.6GHz) steadily?
    since the power scheme's fixed to be "Lenovo" and is only adjustable through its own energy management
    I'm not able to set the power scheme as "Always On" like how I may do with other laptops
    I tried changing every option possible and found no way I could stop the CPU from constantly reducing its speed to half
    it keeps going back and forth between 1.6 & 0.8 GHz 
    how may I possibly get this fixed up? 
    I'd like to have my CPU always run at the full speed when plugged in 
    thanks a lot

    eggimage wrote:
    thanks
    but i've tried adjusting the frequency too
    it is set to the highest frequency by default and still isn't stable
    what program do u use? try cpuz, www.cpuid.com
    EDIT: i also want to ask, why do u want to lock the cpu to 1.6ghz? it will not make any noticable difference in performance, will just keep the vcore high, resulting in high temps, and louder fan..
    Message Edited by nagatyh on 04-05-2009 06:43 PM
    AMD Phenom II X6 1055T / 2xATI HD5770 CF / 8GB DDR3 / 4x500GB RAID-5 / Win 7 Ultimate x64
    Lenovo S10e Black / 2GB DDR2 / 160GB HDD / 6-cell battery / Win 7 Ultimate x86
    Motorola Xoom

Maybe you are looking for