E4200 Very Slow Windows 7 Wireless to attached HD speeds ( 800k/sec)

I'm running 1.0.03.
I have a Toshiba T400 running Win7 Professional.
I have a WD USB Drive connected to the router. (No problems transffering files to it directly from my laptop)
Distance to router doesn't matter.
Right now, all I would like to do is transfer files [video] to the HD attached to the router so that they can be accessed by anyone - primaily by my PS3.
My wireless speeds range anywhere from 300k/sec to 800k/sec (usually somewhere in the middle - depending on settings I change). My wired speeds range from 3-4MB/sec. Both of which I find unacceptable considering even the theoretical speeds of GBe and USB 2. I've tried disconnected everything but just my computer and the HD from the router as well with no change.
I've tried MTU, RD protocol disabling, firewall disabling, A/V disabling, Homegroup disabling, adjusting properties in the driver properties (for both wired and wirelss), looking for network driver updates... Basically anything Google would throw at me with no luck.
Considering the number of posts I see - I'm guessing it's the router? Has anyone come up with a solution yet or are we stuck waiting for Firmware upgrades?
At this point, my max torrent speeds (2-2.5MB/sec) via wireless are faster than LAN transferring and that's just not right. When I return home, I may just try "bypassing" Local Network and transfer the files via Media FTP and see how that fares.
Thanks.

Did you update the firmware to latest or was it pre-installed. If you have updated the firmware of the router recently then it is recommended to reset the router. Push the reset button on router for 30 seconds, turn off the router wait for 30 seconds and then power it on. After this process reconfigure the router. Power light should blink when you perform the reset process.
Then install the Cisco Connect Software. It will help you in configuring the Router.
But if you want to configure it manually then here are the links for configuring the according to the ISP setup…
For DSL Connection:
http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?pid=93&login=1&vw=1&app=search&articleid=2210&userrole=Linksy...
For Cable Connection:
http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?pid=93&login=1&vw=1&app=search&articleid=1040&userrole=Linksy...
Secondly do the rest of the wireless settings again and then check the speed of both wired and wireless connection...

Similar Messages

Very slow Windows domain login over IPSec VPN

Hi
I'm experiencing very slow Windows domain logins over an IPSec VPN connection. The AD is in Site 1, some users are in Site 2. Two Cisco ASA firewalls connect both sites by an IPSec VPN over the Internet.
I made some registery changes on the Windows XP client on site2 to let Kerberos communicate over TCP instead of UDP. Still the logins take extremely long (45 minutes). Profiles are very small, so there had to be a problem with Kerberos, MTU sizes or somethin like that. I already changed the clients MTU settings to 1000 byes, but login is still very slow. I made some sniffer logs...
Does anybody know what the problem can be ?
Regards
Remco

Hi Remco,
The most common issue with slowness over VPN is going to be fragementation. In general below are the recommendations to avoid fragmentation
1. For TCP traffic, use "ip tcp adjust-mss 1360" on the Internal LAN Interface on the Router. If you are using GRE then configure "ip mtu 1400" under the Tunnel Interface.
If you are not using GRE then the value of "ip tcp adjust-mss" depends on the type of transform-set being used E.g. AES\3DES etc, so you can increase the value of TCP adjust command from 1360 to a higher value. Though I will start from 1360 first for testing.
Also take a look at the below article for MTU Issues
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk827/tk369/technologies_white_paper09186a00800d6979.shtml
Thanks,
Naman

Linksys E4200V2 - VERY Slow Performance-WIRED, WIRELESS, INTERNET SPEED

Hi everyone... I just want to start by saying that I am a very unsatisfied customer!
I purchased the Linksys E4200 V2 on 02.06.2012 since this is the latest high end router from Linksys which according to the specs and the reviews this router is supposed to be super mega fast...the box should probably say SUPER MEGA SLOW.
I called support and after spending two hours on the phone they said that the case will be escalated and that someone will contact me within 48 hrs - It has now been more than 72 hrs and no phone calls or emails have come my way - the router is still not performing.
The following is my setup:
HP Quad Core Desktop with Windows 7 x64 bit with 8GB RAM
Network Card is an integrated 1GBPS card
I've upgraded all of my ethernet cables to Cat 6 (to see if this made and difference - which it did not)
LinkSys E4200 V2 router
Western Digital My Book Duo Live 6TB external drive with ethernet port of 1GBPS
This weekend I went as far as reinstalling a fresh copy of Windows 7 x64 on a Solid State Hard drive
My PC is connected to the E4200V2 via Cat 6 cable
The My Book Duo is connected to the E4200V2 via Cat 6 Cable
The E4200V2 is connected to my cable modem via Cat 6 Cable
ISSUES:
WIRED
I am getting no more than 20mbs when I copy a 85GB folder from my PC to my external My Book Duo. I expected to get either 1GBPS speed or at least 400MBs speed since all devices are connected via 1GBPS interfaces and the cables ar Cat 6. I am using both the native windows copy and paste and I am also using TeraCopy to copy files.
WIRELESS
The wireles speed is BAD as well - I am not getting no more than 50MBS with my laptop located just 20 inches from the router.
CABLE MODEM CONNECTION
When I run speed tests to the internet I am getting a very slow speed test of 1.5MBS and sometimes I get 20MBS with the E4200V2 router.
With my OLD Netgear router I get speed tests of 28MBS and never 1.5MBS.

AndrewGoldy wrote:
Hi there,
I've got a very similar problem.
I've got the Cisco Linksys E4200 (Firmware Version: 1.0.05 build 7 Aug 23, 2012).
With my previous router, I was able to copy files over the wired network at roughly 11MB/sec (about 100Mbps).
Now, with the new Linksys router plugged in, with the same cables and pcs, etc, I can only get an average copy rate of 4.4MB/sec - under HALF the speed that I was previously getting - and often sustained slow speeds of roughly 1.8MB/sec
Any ideas???
Otherwise I'm returning this router for something else!!!
I can see that you already have the latest firmware. It might be that the firmware is corrupted. What I can suggest is to reflash the firmware, reset and reconfigure the router. You might as well try to disable WMM.

After Photoshop CC 2014 update - Photoshop is very slow (Windows 7)

After updating today to the latest photoshop cc2014 Version, Photoshop starts very slow and is not useable.
I updated from V. 2014.1.0 to 2014.2.1 20141014.r.257.
Starting Photoshop Needs 6 minutes (before 1.5 minutes). The menue and button reactiontime is more than slow, you cant work with this Setup.
Is there a Problem with the new release?
And please Adobe, dont tell me, my System has a problem. Did only an update on the CC2014 Suite via creative cloud. Old PS Version (2014.1.0)runs great.
After testing a few time, I recovered my System back to Version 2014.1.0 with Windows recovery and Photoshop works good again.
So whats wrong with the new release?
My PC config:
Adobe Photoshop Version: 2014.2.1 20141014.r.257 2014/10/14:23:59:59 CL 987299 x64
Windows 7 64-Bit
Version: 6.1 Service Pack 1
Intel CPU-Familie:6, Modell:10, Stepping:5mit MMX, SSE (ganze Zahl), SSE FP, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, Hyper-Threading
Physischer Prozessor: 8
Logischer Prozessor: 16
Prozessor-Taktfrequenz: 2664 MHz
Memory: 20463 MB
Thanks for any tipp!
BR.
Werner

The CC 2014 update 2014.2.1 is a month old and ACR 8.7 is two days old. Something strange is happening to you. First try resetting your Photoshop Preferences. This is a Adobe Photoshop User forum your not dealing with Adobe here. You seem to think you are and your attitude seems like you not open to to possibility that your system may have a problem. I think you may have one..
Adobe CC 2014 Product Updates/Downloads for Windows
Photoshop CC 2014
File Download
Size
Date
Notes
Adobe Photoshop 2014.2.1 Update for CC 2014 (64-bit)
249 MB
10/20/2014
Release 15.2.1
Adobe Photoshop 2014.2.1 Update for CC 2014 (32-bit)
223 MB
10/20/2014
Adobe Photoshop 2014.2.0 Update for CC 2014 (64-bit)
249 MB
10/6/2014
Release 15.2
Adobe Photoshop 2014.2.0 Update for CC 2014 (32-bit)
223 MB
10/6/2014
Adobe Photoshop 2014.1.0 Update for CC 2014 (64-bit)
236 MB
8/5/2014
Release 15.1
Adobe Photoshop 2014.1.0 Update for CC 2014 (32-bit)
210 MB
8/5/2014
Adobe Camera Raw – ACR
Adobe Camera Raw 8.7 Update for CC
122 MB
11/18/2014
Release 8.7
Adobe Camera Raw 8.6 Update for CC
106 MB
7/28/2014
Release 8.6
Adobe Camera Raw 8.5 Update for CC
100 MB
6/18/2014
Release 8.5

Photoshop CS6 very very slow (Windows 7)

Hi, im desperate as ive run out of options i think. Photoshop CS6 behaves slow, very slow.
Even with no document open, right after launch it reacts with delay on any mouseclick, sometimes it takes
more than 20 seconds before a menu pops open after clicking. Painting paintbrushes are impossible slow.
Basically any action is dragged.
Its impossible to work like this. With all previous versions of PS i never encountered this.
Things i tried :
- turned off gpu acceleration (i read that gpu can cause performance issues, some ppl solved slowness by turning it off)
- updated latest nvidia drivers
- reinstalled photoshop
- tried to inspect photoshop processes with ProcessHacker, even when at 5% cpu it runs extremely slow
specs :
Windows 7
Nvidia GT545
1 terrabyte free scratch disk space (on C:)
8 gb ram
CPU i7 2600

Has it always run slow, or did this start recently?
What anti-virus are you using? Have you tried disabling it to see it that make a difference?
Are you working over a network?

Very Slow BB and Wireless Signal Dropping

Hi, I have a HomeHub 2 which has worked reasonably well over the years. Recently my BB speed seems pretty slow and the wireless signal keeps dropping every 5 seconds or so.
We have several laptops in the house (not all online at once) and this problem affects them all. I have installed inSSIDer and it shows 6 other hubs in the vicinity. I have tried changing the Wireless channel, changing from b/g/n to just b/g, reducing the roaming aggresiveness settings but nothing seems to be working. My hub settings are below
Line state
Connected
Connection time
5 days, 00:27:21
Downstream
3,776 Kbps
Upstream
448 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI
0/38
Type
PPPoA
Modulation
G.992.1 Annex A
Latency type
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up)
5.0 dB / 17.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up)
54.4 dB / 31.0 dB
Output power (Down/Up)
5.8 dBm / 1.4 dBm
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote)
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote)
0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote)
0 / 0
FEC Errors (Down/Up)
30808 / 1223
CRC Errors (Down/Up)
1376 / 32
HEC Errors (Down/Up)
5162 / 37
Error Seconds (Local/Remote)
574 / 36
inSSIDer shows my SSID as -46 (goes as low as -20 when im next to the hub).
Can anyone make any suggestions as to how i can sort this problem as it's driving me nuts.
Thanks in advance.

Hi the link was produced byanother of thecommunuty members Keith the link has now beennoved to another server as the BT web space in no longer available I will ask him to repost his link to you
You do seem to have a lot of wireless in your area which is making it very difficult to have a completely free channel all you can do is find a channel that has the weakest signals on It and try that hopefully Keith will post the link and maybe some further ideas
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Airport Express as very slow in "extend wireless network" mode

Hi!
I am using a Airport Extreme (fourth generation) as a wireless router and a Airport Express 802.11n in "extend wireless network" mode.
I've set the Airport Extreme mode to 802.11n only - and all devices connect to the Airport Extreme as 802.11n Clients properly.
But as soon as they connect to the Airport Express, they only work in 802.11b/g mode (although they are capable of n)
and the connection is very slow - around 1Mb/s:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/804/bildschirmfoto20111211u.png/
Can i force the Airport Express station to accept only "n" connections to speed up my file tranfers?
Thanks for any help!
matt

Where is the AirPort Express located in relation to the area that needs more wireless coverage?
Ideally, it would be at a point that is about half the distance between the AirPort Extreme and the area that needs more wireless coverage....and....there would be no obstructions like walls and/or ceilings in the signal path....tough to do in most homes, so do the best that you can.
Avoid placing the Express down low on the wall and use an extension cord to get it up as high as possible with a free look into the room.
The Express will normally "extend" what it receives, but you could try the following to see if it helps:
Temporarily, change the Wireless Mode setting on the AirPort Express to "Create a wireless network" and change the Radio Mode to "802.11n only".
(You may have to hold down the option key on your Mac while you click on the Radio Mode selection box to see the "802.11n only" choice). Then change the Wireless Mode back to "Extend a wireless network" and Update.

Very Slow Windows Networking

My department is running OS X 10.4, and we're networked with a Windows server for storage and job backup. One of our main backup servers is very slow. Logging into the server can take up to 5-7 minutes, and for a period of 5-7 minutes after that the machine logging into the server will run very slow, even when not copying a file.
Now the backup server is quite large (almost a terrabyte), which is my belief why it runs so slowly. We have two other servers on the same network that behave fine.
Is there something on my end (OS X) that can speed up the problem, or is this a server issue? My boss is demanding answers and our Windows IT guy is placing the blame solely on our Macs (with no evidence of course). Help!

Google for "SMB performance". There are a bunch of discussions on macosxhints on how to tweak SMB performance on Max OS X. I have tried a few different ones, which all seem to help in some small way. YMMV.
Apple SMB is not known for its performance.

Consumer loop very slow, queue size grows. How to speed up my consumer loop? As the array grows the slower it gets.

LabView version: 2012
OS: Windows XP SP3
Hardware: USB NI cDAQ-9174 NI-9221
Application: Oscilloscope
I'm relatively new to LabView and I'm currently experiencing some performance issues with my project. I guess it has something to do with the way it's programmed. I'm hoping to get some tips from you guys.
This is my producer loop. It should be capable of acquiring 100 000 Samples/s. I guess I've done this the right way and can't really be improved. Or am I mistaking?
This is (part of) my consumer loop. It's too slow, the number of elements in the queue keeps getting bigger. I'm doing two types of calculations on the queue data. One for changing the scalling (a multiplication), one for changing the y-position (a summation). Because each time there are 10 000 samples acquired I have added an extra loop (inner loop). This loop splits the array into x samples when the requested samples are smaller than 10 000 or adds them when the requested samples are bigger than 10 000. This depends on the user input (time/dev).
For example: when the user request 100 seconds of data to be plotted on a graph we get an array of 10 000 000 x 8. Is this considered big? Enlarging the array to that size is very very slow, the queue builds up rapidly.
I don't know what really slows it down or how to 'debug' this properly. Transposing the array twice seems avoidable?
Maybe I'm doing this in an inefficient way? Any thoughts that might help me?
The VI's are attached.
Thanks for your input.
Attachments:
Scope.zip ‏199 KB

Thank you for your replies so far!
LV_Pro,
I agree it is a bit silly to plot more than 2000 points. I will change this. But even without a graph, the consumer loop seems to be unable to handle the speed.
tst,
1. Ok, I will change this
2. Thank you for pointing this out. I implemented your technique and have some increased performance.
Still not the speed I would expect from LabView. The system is 'stable' with a sample rate up to 100 Hz, increasing this makes my queue overflow.
I must be doing something else wrong... Anymore ideas?
Latest version of program in attachment.
Attachments:
Scope 1.zip ‏211 KB

Very slow printing via wireless to HP 6500E710n-z

I have a home network consisting of a Toshiba Satellite A105 laptop running Windows XP SP3 and connecting to the router by wireless communication, My son's desktop gaming computer running Windows 7 and connecting to the router by Ethernet Cable, and my Gateway Computer running Vista and connecting to the router by Ethernet Cable. The printer is connected to my computer by USB and the printer's wireless communications is turned on and connected to the router without any errors. The router is a linksys E3000 and the Toshiba laptop connects to it with an excellent signal strength and can surf the internet with no problems. The worst signal level I have seen on the printer wireless is level 2 out of 5 and is normally better.
When I try to print from the Toshiba wireless to the printer, it will print the first page in less than 20 seconds and then stop. I have waited for 20 minutes and it still did not print another page. The printer display says "printing" and it will print a line every 10 minutes or so, but that is it. Sometimes, it will print 2 pages very fast in the beginning, then not print any more for a long time. I don't know how long it would actually take to finish printing because I get tired of waiting and cancel the print job ( I have waited for as long as 20 minutes though ).
When my son prints from his Windows 7 gaming computer, which is wired to the router, it is the same way. The first page or two will print very fast, then he said he has waited for 10 minutes and it did not print any more.
When I print, the print speed is OK because I am using USB connections. I spent 2.5 hours on the phone this afternoon with HP Technical Support ( in India I think ) and they adjusted the print spooler on the Toshiba, and other stuff, but said the problem was with the router. They also said I should not call Cisco because they will deny that the problem is with the router. I do know that I can shut down both wired computers so the only job the router has is the Toshiba laptop and it does not help at all. The printing is just the same as when all 3 computers are up and running.
HP states that this printer will work at up to 300 feet wireless, and I am 25 feet from the router with the laptop when trying to print and the router is 25 feet from the printer and the laptop is about 35 feet from the printer.
We purchased the HP 6500 two weeks ago and my wife says "take it back to the store". I like the printer and want to get it working, but if this is the best I can do then I guess it will go back to the store.
Thanks in advance for any help anyone can give me.

Download and run this: http://h20180.www2.hp.com/apps/Nav?h_pagetype=s-926&h_lang=en&h_client=s-h-e17-1&h_keyword=dg-NDU&ju...
Say thanks by clicking "Kudos" "thumbs up" in the post that helped you.
I am employed by HP

PE7 very slow Windows 7 64 bit

Hi guys,
PE7 is running very slowly for me.
I'm running an i7 920 with 8GB of ram.
Windows 7 64 bit
Graphics card is Nvidia GeForce 9600GT running the latest driver V270.61
I am importing AVCHD videos into PE7 and then just dragging them across onto the work timeline and it just takes ages and hangs there for quite a while.
I can't edit the video on the timeline at all as it is just taking too long.
Any suggestions out there would be appreciated.
thanks

Since AVCHD is a video file, not just a static picture, hard drive configuration is important
My 3 hard drives are configured as... (WD = Western Digital)
1 - 320G WD Win7 64bit Pro and all program installs
2 - 320G WD Win7 swap file and video project files
3 - 1T WD all video files... read and write files
Trying to use only ONE Hard Drive for Video Editing
You are a music conductor, with a baton that you use to point to various parts of the orchestra... this is like Windows pointing to various parts of the hard drive to do Windows housekeeping or to load program segments for various functions
Now, at the same time and with the same hand... while still using the baton to conduct the orchestra... pick up a bow and play a fiddle... this would be doing something with your video file at the same time as all the other work
You as a person cannot do both at the same time with the same hand
A computer is a LITTLE better, in that it can switch from one kind of task to another very quickly... but not quickly enough for easy video editing
One hard drive is not as good as two which is not as good as three

Sattalite Pro 6100: Very slow Windows installation

I have a Sattalite Pro 6100 series.
The harddrive crashed, so I bought a new one. It is 40 GB / 5700 RPM, so supposedly slightly faster than original equipment.
When I placed it, BIOS did not see it.
I removed it, put it back and BIOS did see it.
I placed the Dutch Windows XP Home CD and NTFS formatted (not fast) the entire HD.
After that Windows took a good 3 hours to install even though it claimed it would only take 39 minutes to start with.
Booting up to Windows takes a long time.
Windows operation seems slower than what I am used to, but I have not actually used the (crashed) laptop for 2 months, so I can't be sure.
Any idea's?
David

Well, yeah. I kinda figured it would be hard to answer, but maybe, just maybe it was a known issue?
HDD manufacturer is Toshiba.
I have downloaded the BIOS update and will install this later today. Will this fix the installation of Windows, or is everything just slow due to lack of BIOS update and it will fix itself. In other words: do I need to re-install Windows because it took forever to install?
No image recovery possible. The old HD is DEAD! No image was made before it died.
David

ZCM 11 very slow Windows 7 image restore

Hello NG
In our enviroment we work with ZCM11. We made a Windows 7 image. The zcm
filesize is about 4.7 GB. The disksize is 40 GB.
Now the restore take long time. For restoring 4.7 GB Zenworks Imaging need
about 85 Minutes. It can not be true!!
The cause why ZCM imaging has problems is the winsxs folder, with a lot of
small files. Here ZCM do lose much time.
Does exist a patch or hotpatch that do solve this issue?
Regards
Ramon

Hi Domicicm
could you send me a link where i can download this imagex tool? I didn't
find a third party software for imaging.
Ramon
"dominicm" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[email protected]..
hi ramon, if you read older posts on this concern, yes it is "normal"
.... it seems that's the limitation of the actual imaging engine (10.3
or 11).
I'm in the same boat as you, Novell recommends to use imagex the
third-party tool, that works really fast (about 12 min to restore an
win7 image, even with the winsxs folder) but the problem with imagex is
we can't multicast, so big problem here..... no real solution, and
Novell is expecting to release a new Imaging Engine for about the
spring....
dominicm
dominicm's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=4271
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=432403

Very slow Windows 7 boot time

Hey,
I recently bootcamped my MacBook with Windows 7 for the second time and I've noticed a huge difference in booting speeds. I have Windows set as my boot device. After the white screen, the laptop stays at a black screen with a flashing white underscore for around a minute. After that, the computer starts as normal.
How can I remove the black screen, considering there isn't a BIOS for bootcamp?
Thanks in advance,

What happens is Bootcamp has work its magic with the Mac EFI system that is similar to what PC systems call Bios. Its the basics startup instructions for the hardware. Because Windows does not work well with EFI boot systems. A longer boot time can be expected. You can check your Windows portion of the boot with MSconfig although I would not mess with changing anything unless you know what your doing. Otherwise you could corrupt the boot config. I would say my Macbook Pro 2011 takes about 20 seconds to boot into Windows from power up to Windows sign in. Remember your not booting Windows on a PC your booting Windows on a Mac which although BootCamp is a decent way to do that. Its not tweaked as well as say a PC which was designed and built around running Windows. Drivers, hardware, and Bootcamp are Apple. Only Windows is Microsoft. I highly doubt Microsoft worries a lot about making Windows boot well on a Mac.

MOVED: 880gm-e43 with Crucial SSD = very slow windows boot times

This topic has been moved to Windows 64bit.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=155325.0

Hi,
Thank you for your post.
From your description, I see the issue you are facing is there is no menu to choose OS when booting dual boot(Windows 7 & Windows 8). Please let me know if I have misunderstood anything.
It seems that the Windows 7 entry is missing, currently, we can use a tool –
EasyBCD to get it back. After downloading it, choose the Add/Edit panel item, select the OS you're missing and let the program detect it. Then simply click the Add button to add the missing OS entry.
At the meantime, here is a related link which demonstrates how to keep Windows 7 as the default OS in dual boot, you may use it for a reference.
How to Dual-Boot Windows 8 While Keeping Windows 7 As Your Default OS
http://blog.laptopmag.com/how-to-dual-boot-windows-8-while-keeping-windows-7-as-your-default-os
[Please Note: Since the website is not hosted by Microsoft, the link may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy
of this information.]
Regarding your second questions in your first post, you can refer to the following link to know more about dual boot.
Dual
Booting Explained: How You Can Have Multiple Operating Systems on Your Computer
http://www.howtogeek.com/187789/dual-booting-explained-how-you-can-have-multiple-operating-systems-on-your-computer/
[Please Note: Since the website is not hosted by Microsoft, the link may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy
of this information.]
Hopefully the information is helpful. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks for your time.
Best Regards,
Sophia Sun
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

E4200 Very Slow Windows 7 Wireless to attached HD speeds ( 800k/sec)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for