E4200 Xbox One NAT Issues (2 Xboxes)

On Xbox One in the network settings you can check whether your xbox has an open NAT type. I cannot get both xboxes open, plain and simple. Are there any special techniques that will allow both xboxes to be open. I reset the royer to default to see if there were any settings that I fudged up, but that didn't help.
I rebooted my router yesterday are turning of spi settings, and turned on the strict xbox, and after the reboot that one is now open. I turned on the other xbox and now that one is strict.
If anyone has found out how to get more than one xbox open please let me know how you did it, thanks.

It really all depends on the IP Address you get from your ISP. The IP Address your router gets from the ISP's modem.
Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
Linksys
Communities Technical Support

Similar Messages

NAT issues with 5 XBOX consoles on network

I have my other XBOXs connected to a 24 port switch but the one connected to the ea6500 directly gives me this moderate NAT issue. I thought this new router would be an upgrade to my old dlink but so far I get a new problem every day.
I have reserved dhcp addresses for all the boxes and set up port triggering for the ports listed in several guides. But what else do I need to do? Is it likely I got a bad router?

If your xbox is directly connected to the modem, do you have an open nat for your xbox? Have you tried forwarding the ports? If it did not work using port trigerring, try forwarding the ports then. One thing that you have to make sure if you do port forwarding is that you should be getting a public IP address on your router page. If you're not getting a public IP, there might be a need for your modem to be set to bridge mode. You may refer to this link for more info: http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?pid=80&vw=1&articleid=22385 (Resolving NAT type issues with gaming consoles through a Linksys router).
Btw, are you using the cloud firmware or classic?

NAT issue - WRT54G Version 1.1 with Vista Home Premium

Router = WRT54G Version 1.1
I am trying to figure out the cause of my problems, this router or Vista?
I have 2 PC’s (just want to use my Vista 1) connected to the same router that is connected to a cable modem – the Windows XP machine has no problems bar its age and spec. I have a brand new PC with Vista Home Premium installed on it, now it is this new PC that I am having NAT problems with and port blocking.
I have installed Windows Live Messenger and when setting it up I went into Tools/Options/Connections and I get an error message:- "You are connected to the internet through a UPnP port restricted NAT. The Windows Firewall is enabled. (User)"
I have no option to run the trouble shooter (greyed out)…….
If I turn off Windows Vista Firewall I get:- "You are connected to the internet through a UPnP port restricted NAT. (User)”
Since this I have installed Media server software and have to reset the port it uses every time as it is always stating that it is blocked.
I have downloaded OpenOffice via a torrent client which also stated that I had NAT problems.
I have no NAT issues at all on my older XP PC and as a result I believe it is safe to rule out my router and modem……..I have only disabled Windows Firewall and this had made no difference, but I have not tried uninstalling it (no idea if that would make a difference)
Oh, I do not have UPnP enabled (router setting) – does this matter (I have tried turning it on but made no difference to this issue so I turned it off again)?
Message Edited by jomuir on 08-23-2007 02:50 AM

user11241256 wrote:
Documentation states that Oracle is supported on Vista business and Ultra. unfortuntatly Ihave Home Premium 64 and was curious if anyone had experience imstalling on this OS. I did attempt to install the 11g and I got one warning below that I could not find in the documentation for errors. You have answered your query yourself.
You might be able to get the things running on an unsupported combination but there is no guarantee about the stability.

Console Gaming - NAT Issues - Workaround and Solut...

I've already used the BT Broadband Contact Us, to raise this issue. They said it was beyond them and that they'd forward me an address for a technical forum. They've not managed to do so yet, so I'm trying here.
Problem:
NAT hole punching regularly fails between peers/players, manifests as "Cannot chat to player due to NAT Issues" on many different broadband routers.
TL/DR:
The BT Home Hub iptables INPUT chain should have a default action of DROP and not REJECT.
Long Version:
I'm a network engineer and programmer analyst and have been for approaching two decades. I'm also a gamer. I'm regularly frustrated by NAT Issue errors while trying to play online games with my friends.
Frustrated for so long, we decided to start analysing the problem. Using packet captures and simulations, we have reproduced the problem and identified dubious logic in the netfilter conntrack module in the Linux kernel.
When it works:
When using a Playstation 4 to play Destiny, using either in-game or PS Party chat, each console uses a NAT discovery service to find it's external IP address and make an educated guess as to whether there is port translation.
At the end of this process, each Player Console receives IP/Port pairs for the other players, they then emit UDP from their desired port to the IP/Port pair of each of the other Players. These UDP packets pass through their NATing routers and establish conntrack entries for the source ip/port, destination ip/port and protocol (here on referred to as five-tuple) with NAT associations with the console's LAN ip address and port; this is the hole-punching.
All being well, each players console has created an association for each of the other players packets to come back through and then they are able to send each other data on these ports.
When it doesn't work:
However, here's the race condition: if player B's packet reaches player A's router before player A has sent theirs, there is no NAT association, no conntrack entry for the 5-tuple. The incoming packet instead considered as intended for the router.
The iptables configuration on the router says that the packet is not allowed and REJECTs it, sending an ICMP destination unreachable packet in response. This reply is then inspected by conntrack, which decapsulates is and erroneously creates a conntrack entry for the 5-tuple.
Now when Player A's console does manage to send it's own hole punching UDP packet, the 5-tuple for the desire hole is associated with the router's ICMP destination-unreachable. So Player A's packet can't have the desired port number and is renumbered to the first available port (e.g. 1025). Player B's subsequent packets to A follow the conntrack entry started by the ICMP destination-unreachable and are sent to the router which continues to reject them.
How to fix this mess
Linux conntrack
Arguably the decapsulation of the ICMP payload and the usage of it to create a conntrack entry is erroneous. The ICMP unreach should not stop the port from being used by a NAT client.
This will take a long time to fix and when fixed may never be back-ported to home routers which may never see new firmware again anyway.
Modify the routers configuration
If the router dropped instead of rejecting the traffic (relatively simple administrative task given appropriate access), the ICMP destination-unreachable wouldn't be generated, conntrack wouldn't create the erroneous entry and then even if Player B's packets arrived before Player A had sent theirs, it would still work.
Disable the "firewall" and put your console in the "DMZ"
These are terms borrowed from the Home Hub 3 admin interface. If you set your console as the "DMZ", it will receive any internet traffic that isn't associated with an already established flow. Actually at this point I'm not certain whether or not you *have* to set the "firewall" to disabled. It depends on how the "firewall" is implemented.
On my console disabling the firewall and setting the console to be the DMZ works around the problem. However, you can only have one default NAT target. So any other device suffering from this problem would be out of luck without you reconfiguring your router each time. Also I'm not thrilled by my console receiving unfiltered internet traffic.
In closing
Race-conditions depend on timings. This one is exacerbated by low latency between players. In this case the difference between server<->PlayerA and server<->PlayerB latencies has to be lower than the PlayerA<->PlayerB latency. If PlayerA and PlayerB have low latency between each other they are more likely to suffer from this problem.
Please, please, please bring this to the attention of someone who is responsible for the configuration of your routers. A simple configuration change on the HomeHub would prevent this problem from happening and remove the need for customers to add special configuration to their router and lowering their security.
Thanks for reading.
Matt

Welcome to this forum.
This is a customer to customer forum only,
This is where customers help each other get the most out of BT products & services.
Anything you post here does not go to BT. Although the forum is moderated by BT, not all posts are read.
This is a public forum which can be viewed worldwide, so please do not post any personal information, especially phone numbers, account numbers, fault numbers, address information or email addresses, as this could be used to impersonate you.
I would suggest that maybe you try using a different router?
There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

RV042 One-to-One NAT outbound probelm

I am using RV042 router with firmware 1.3.12.19-tm.
I have two live IP address which I'd to assign to a two PCs on my LAN. When I setup one-to-one NAT the two machines become accessible from the internet. However no outbound traffic then works for those two machines; i.e. I cannot access anything on internet from them. As soon as I disable One-to-One NAT outbounds starts working perfectly.
I have tried changing the default Access Rules but all in vain.
Could anyone explain whats going on?

Hello
I've looked into the issue some more during the weekend. The config seems to be correct, the real problem is when I try to do changes in an existing NAT, or use public IPs that has previosly been natted.
I redid the NAT using another public IP that has never been natted before and that worked with the same host and internal IP, but now I cant use the 212.116.83.180 on a new NAT.
It's almost like the external IPs gets locked up somehow and are unusable even after the original NAT is removed.
Another funny thing is that packet-trace doesnt produce any errors, even though the NAT isnt working properly.
So I'm not sure what the real problem is, if this is a bug in the OS or if theres a need to somehow clear the config even though the NATs are removed.
Best Regards

Firewall Access Rules do not work on One to One NAT (RV042G Router)

I have two unique IP addresses, two servers, and one RV042G router.
What I would like to do is have each IP address go to it's own respective server. To do that, I've set the settings on One-to-One NAT to make this happen. Now IP address 1 points to server A and IP address 2 points to server B.
However, I only want port 80 to be open to each server. I've tried setting the Firewall access rules to accommodate this but it doesn't appear to block anything. All ports on the servers are exposed despite the firewall rules.
Here's what I have in the router configuration:
Under One-to-One NAT:
{internal IP address 1} => {external IP address 1}
{internal IP address 2} => {external IP address 2}
Under Firewall Access Rules:
Action | Service | Source Interface | Source | Destination | Time
Allow | HTTP Secondary 80 | WAN1 | Any | {internal IP address 1} | Always
Deny | All Traffic | WAN1 | Any | Any | Always
Is there a proper way to accomplish what I want?

Thanks for replying.
Turns out I had to add new access rules to specifically deny all traffic to the internal addresses, in addition to the rule allowing the specified ports through.
So, with the IP addresses still defined the same way in the One-to-One NAT section, I now have the following rules defined in the firewall section:
Under Firewall Access Rules:
Priority | Action | Service | Source Interface | Source | Destination | Time
[1] | Allow | HTTP Secondary 80 | ANY | Any | {internal IP address 1} | Always
[2] Deny | All Traffic | WAN1 | Any | { internal IP address 1 } | Always <== the new one I ended up adding
(default) | Deny | All Traffic | WAN1 | Any | Any | Always <== built in default rule in router
I originally did not add the second rule because I had assumed that the default deny rule would block all traffic to all internal IP addresses anyway. Perhaps someone can correct me if I'm wrong but I am now assuming that the default deny rule applies to the router only and not to any other defined One-to-One NAT entries. In which case, I had to add another rule that duplicates the default deny rule but for each 1:1 NAT entry.
If this was already in the manual, I probably missed it so that would be my own mistake. Still, I wish this was more apparent in the web GUI as it didn't really specify that I had to do this.
In any case, I hope my solution helps anyone else in the future having this similar issue.

TS1702 Renewed my subscription with the Sun app, was charged £0.69 but app won't load seem that I am not the only one having issue with this app. How can I claim my money back?

Renewed my subscription with the Sun app, was charged £0.69 but app won't load seem that I am not the only one having issue with this app. How can I claim my money back?

It sounds like you may have multiple problems, but none of them are likely to be caused by malware.
First, the internet-related issues may be related to adware or a network compromise. I tend to lean more towards the latter, based on your description of the problem. See:
http://www.adwaremedic.com/kb/baddns.php
http://www.adwaremedic.com/kb/hackedrouter.php
If investigation shows that this is not a network-specific issue, then it's probably adware. See my Adware Removal Guide for help finding and removing it. Note that you mention AdBlock as if it should have prevented this, but it's important to understand that ad blockers do not protect you against adware in any way. Neither would any kind of anti-virus software, which often doesn't detect adware.
As for the other issues, it sounds like you've got some serious corruption. I would be inclined to say it sounds like a failing drive, except it sounds like you just got it replaced. How did you get all your files back after the new drive was installed?
(Fair disclosure: I may receive compensation from links to my sites, TheSafeMac.com and AdwareMedic.com, in the form of buttons allowing for donations. Donations are not required to use my site or software.)

Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverse flows - NAT Issue

Having a problem with a VPN site trying to communicate to a subnet off my ASA 5505.   The network is simple, VPN IPSEC remote site is 192.168.6.0/24 and I can ping and access hosts on 192.168.10.0/24 (called InfraNet).   I am now trying to allow communications between 192.168.6.0/24 (called FD_net) to 192.168.9.0/24 (called Inside)
The Error:
5          Nov 12 2012          13:52:50                    192.168.9.19                                        Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverse flows; Connection for icmp src outside:192.168.6.11 dst inside:192.168.9.19 (type 8, code 0) denied due to NAT reverse path failure
I understand this is a NAT issue; but I not seeing the error and could use a second set of eyes.   Here's my current running configuration.
: Saved
ASA Version 8.3(2)
hostname fw1
domain-name xxxxxxxx.xxx
enable password <removed>
passwd <removed>
names
interface Vlan1
description Town Internal Network
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.9.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan2
description Public Internet
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 173.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.248
interface Vlan3
description DMZ (CaTV)
nameif dmz
security-level 50
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan10
description Infrastructure Network
nameif InfraNet
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan13
description Guest Wireless
nameif Wireless-Guest
security-level 25
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan23
nameif StateNet
security-level 75
ip address 10.63.198.2 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan33
description Police Subnet
shutdown
nameif PDNet
security-level 90
ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
interface Ethernet0/1
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,5,10,13
switchport trunk native vlan 1
switchport mode trunk
speed 100
duplex full
interface Ethernet0/2
switchport access vlan 3
interface Ethernet0/3
interface Ethernet0/4
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,10,13
switchport trunk native vlan 1
switchport mode trunk
interface Ethernet0/5
switchport access vlan 23
interface Ethernet0/6
shutdown
interface Ethernet0/7
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1
switchport trunk native vlan 1
switchport mode trunk
shutdown
banner exec                     Access Restricted to Personnel Only
banner login                     Access Restricted to Personnel Only
ftp mode passive
clock timezone EST -5
clock summer-time EDT recurring
dns server-group DefaultDNS
domain-name xxxxxxx.xxx
same-security-traffic permit inter-interface
object network obj_any
subnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
object service IMAPoverSSL
service tcp destination eq 993
description IMAP over SSL
object service POPoverSSL
service tcp destination eq 995
description POP3 over SSL
object service SMTPwTLS
service tcp destination eq 465
description SMTP with TLS
object network obj-192.168.9.20
host 192.168.9.20
object network obj-claggett-https
host 192.168.9.20
object network obj-claggett-imap4
host 192.168.9.20
object network obj-claggett-pop3
host 192.168.9.20
object network obj-claggett-smtp
host 192.168.9.20
object network obj-claggett-imapoverssl
host 192.168.9.20
object network obj-claggett-popoverssl
host 192.168.9.20
object network obj-claggett-smtpwTLS
host 192.168.9.20
object network obj-192.168.9.120
host 192.168.9.120
object network obj-192.168.9.119
host 192.168.9.119
object network obj-192.168.9.121
host 192.168.9.121
object network obj-wirelessnet
subnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
object network WirelessClients
subnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
object network obj-dmznetwork
subnet 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
object network FD_Firewall
host 74.94.142.229
object network FD_Net
subnet 192.168.6.0 255.255.255.0
object network NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.10.0_24
subnet 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
object network obj-TownHallNet
subnet 192.168.9.0 255.255.255.0
object network obj_InfraNet
subnet 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
object-group service EmailServices
description Normal Email/Exchange Services
service-object object IMAPoverSSL
service-object object POPoverSSL
service-object object SMTPwTLS
service-object tcp destination eq https
service-object tcp destination eq imap4
service-object tcp destination eq pop3
service-object tcp destination eq smtp
object-group service DM_INLINE_SERVICE_1
service-object object IMAPoverSSL
service-object object POPoverSSL
service-object object SMTPwTLS
service-object tcp destination eq pop3
service-object tcp destination eq https
service-object tcp destination eq smtp
object-group service DM_INLINE_SERVICE_2
service-object object IMAPoverSSL
service-object object POPoverSSL
service-object object SMTPwTLS
service-object tcp destination eq https
service-object tcp destination eq pop3
service-object tcp destination eq smtp
object-group network obj_clerkpc
description Clerk's PCs
network-object object obj-192.168.9.119
network-object object obj-192.168.9.120
network-object object obj-192.168.9.121
object-group network TownHall_Nets
network-object 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
network-object object obj-TownHallNet
object-group network DM_INLINE_NETWORK_1
network-object 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 192.168.9.0 255.255.255.0
access-list outside_access_in extended permit object-group DM_INLINE_SERVICE_2 any interface outside
access-list outside_access_in extended permit object-group DM_INLINE_SERVICE_1 any host 192.168.9.20
access-list StateNet_access_in extended permit ip object-group obj_clerkpc any
access-list outside_2_cryptomap extended permit ip object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_1 object FD_Net
pager lines 24
logging enable
logging asdm debugging
logging mail errors
logging from-address hostmaster@xxxxxxxxx
logging recipient-address john@xxxxxxxxx level errors
mtu inside 1500
mtu outside 1500
mtu dmz 1500
mtu Wireless-Guest 1500
mtu StateNet 1500
mtu InfraNet 1500
mtu PDNet 1500
no failover
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
asdm image disk0:/asdm-635.bin
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
nat (InfraNet,outside) source static TownHall_Nets TownHall_Nets destination static FD_Net FD_Net
nat (inside,outside) source static TownHall_Nets TownHall_Nets destination static FD_Net FD_Net
object network obj_any
nat (inside,outside) static interface
object network obj-claggett-https
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp https https
object network obj-claggett-imap4
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp imap4 imap4
object network obj-claggett-pop3
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp pop3 pop3
object network obj-claggett-smtp
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp smtp smtp
object network obj-claggett-imapoverssl
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp 993 993
object network obj-claggett-popoverssl
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp 995 995
object network obj-claggett-smtpwTLS
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp 465 465
object network obj-192.168.9.120
nat (inside,StateNet) static 10.63.198.12
object network obj-192.168.9.119
nat (any,StateNet) static 10.63.198.10
object network obj-192.168.9.121
nat (any,StateNet) static 10.63.198.11
object network obj-wirelessnet
nat (Wireless-Guest,outside) static interface
object network obj-dmznetwork
nat (any,outside) static interface
object network obj_InfraNet
nat (InfraNet,outside) static interface
access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
access-group StateNet_access_in in interface StateNet
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 173.166.117.190 1
route StateNet 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.63.198.1 1
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
dynamic-access-policy-record DfltAccessPolicy
http server enable 5443
http 192.168.9.0 255.255.255.0 inside
http 74.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.255 outside
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 28800
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
crypto map outside_map 2 match address outside_2_cryptomap
crypto map outside_map 2 set pfs
crypto map outside_map 2 set peer 173.xxx.xxx.xxx
crypto map outside_map 2 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
crypto map outside_map interface outside
crypto isakmp enable outside
crypto isakmp policy 10
authentication pre-share
encryption 3des
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
telnet 192.168.9.0 255.255.255.0 inside
telnet timeout 5
ssh 192.168.9.0 255.255.255.0 inside
ssh timeout 5
console timeout 0
dhcpd dns 208.67.222.222 208.67.220.220
dhcpd lease 10800
dhcpd auto_config outside
dhcpd address 192.168.2.100-192.168.2.254 dmz
dhcpd dns 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4 interface dmz
dhcpd enable dmz
dhcpd address 192.168.1.100-192.168.1.254 Wireless-Guest
dhcpd enable Wireless-Guest
threat-detection basic-threat
threat-detection statistics host number-of-rate 2
threat-detection statistics port
threat-detection statistics protocol
threat-detection statistics access-list
no threat-detection statistics tcp-intercept
ntp server 63.240.161.99 source outside prefer
ntp server 207.171.30.106 source outside prefer
ntp server 70.86.250.6 source outside prefer
webvpn
group-policy FDIPSECTunnel internal
group-policy FDIPSECTunnel attributes
vpn-idle-timeout none
vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec l2tp-ipsec
username support password <removed> privilege 15
tunnel-group 173.xxx.xxx.xxx type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group 173.xxx.xxx.xxx general-attributes
default-group-policy FDIPSECTunnel
tunnel-group 173.xxx.xxx.xxx ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *****
smtp-server 192.168.9.20
prompt hostname context
call-home
profile CiscoTAC-1
no active
destination address http https://tools.cisco.com/its/service/oddce/services/DDCEService
destination address email [email protected]
destination transport-method http
subscribe-to-alert-group diagnostic
subscribe-to-alert-group environment
subscribe-to-alert-group inventory periodic monthly
subscribe-to-alert-group configuration periodic monthly
subscribe-to-alert-group telemetry periodic daily
Cryptochecksum:e4dc3cef0de15123f11439822880a2c7
: end
Any ideas would be appreciated.
John

I don't see any inspection-commands in your config. Is there a reason for not using any of them?
If your problem is only with ICMP, then you should enable at least icmp-inspection. You can do that easiely with the legacy command " fixup protocol icmp"
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

1.1.3 update went great!!! But one gmail issue!

The update was simple and works great. Thanks apple.
One little issue is now my gmail on my iphone has 2500 emails sitting in my inbox. How do I get rid of them? Please don't say one by one???

That's because Gmail is now IMAP on the phone. Whatever you do on the phone or online is duplicated either on the phone or server depending on where you did it. I think once the emails are on your computer it doesn't effect either the phone or online. Notice I said "Think" I don't have much experience with IMAP.

New nat issue

Never had this happen before. Installed Border in a lab setting..nw6.5
sp1a overlay cd, then border 3.8, then sp2 then tcp645j...
The first thing I always try to do is get dynamic NAT working then I
worry about the proxy services and so on. Opened icmp all the way so I
could test ping.
Server can ping both it's public and private interface, and can ping
points beyond on both sides of those two interfaces.
Workstation can ping border's private and public IP's but nothing beyond
the public IP. Traceroute never returns anything. Seems like Nat just
isn't working. Turned it off and back on...no help there.
I've set this up many times in outerlying offices and in my lab...for
some reason this time it won't work. I've even blown it out and redone
my set up from the beginning...same thing....Yes, dynamic nat passtru is
set on....
Tried to do the tcpip debug = 1 thing...the packets rolled off logger
such that I could not get an F2 to save a darn thing....You woulnd't
think a brand new box would have all the much traffic just yet...
Version of NAT is 7.00.07, trying very hard to understand what's going
on here. Ideas on why nat won't work?

Jim Michael wrote:
> jim fixit wrote:
>
>
>>nw65 sp1a as indicated, bm 3.8sp2 not happy together....
>
>
> I'm running that combo here (sanem NAT.NLM too), and don't have the NAT
> issue you describe.
>
> --
> Jim
> NSC SYsop
hmm yes...I'm running a similar set up in a number of branch offices so
I'm really hard pressed to understand what is with NAT or if it is even
NAT at all that is having the issue.....

Love the new version! Just one small issue with pixelpoint stylus

love the new version with different width strokes - makes a huge difference!
one minor issue is the undo button on the Adonit pixelpoint stylus only works intermittently. I find when it doesn't work I do one or two more strokes after which it works. So its not entirely unworkable but is a bit annoying.

love the new version with different width strokes - makes a huge difference!
one minor issue is the undo button on the Adonit pixelpoint stylus only works intermittently. I find when it doesn't work I do one or two more strokes after which it works. So its not entirely unworkable but is a bit annoying.

One Goods Issue document for more than one delivery

Hi
I would like to know if it's possibile to post one goods issue relative to more than one delivery. Generally the relationship between goods issue and delivery is one to one but we have the necessity to create one global goods issue relative to more than one delivery. Do you know if it's possible? How can we do?
Thank you very much for your attention
Andrea

Hi Andrea.,
I dont think it is possible in standard SAp functionality,it may be possible with some technical changes
REWARD if helpfull
Thanks & Regards
Narayana

Could DirectTv server be causing my Double Nat Issues?

     Could DirectTv server be causing my Double Nat Issues? I am using an older Motorola Modem, then my Airport Extreme, then my airport express in bridge mode. The DirectTv server seems to be plugged in before the Airportr Express so I am pretty sure it is no getting any info from the Airport Extreme but I am not sure.
     The modem is model Motorola SurfBoard 5101U. I do not beleive it has router capabilities.
     The problem seems to only come up when I am using my Mac Book Pro (Mavericks). Usually only when trying to download large files. It does not effect my ipads or iphones. Very strange.
    I've been racking my brain on this for a year.
Thanks,
Stephen

So, I run into some similar problems. I used to have the HD-DVR pre-Genie, which is when I started seeing some of the problems that my AirPort Utility was reporting. I hardwire every connection where possible. I currently run out of my AirPort TC into a switch. From the switch I go out to the rest of the house including an Apple TV and the new Genie. Along with multiple other wall ports, etc.
It seems to me that whenever I have my Genie hardwired in - for extended period of times my network will "crash" and I will receive an error of Double NAT. Once I unplug the DirecTV from the network, everything goes back to working fine. This ocurred on the old HD-DVR as well as the Genie.
I would welcome any ideas or suggestions.
I am running a Motorola SURFboard S86141, New AirPort Extreme TC, and a Netgear 8-Port Switch.
Thank you in advance for your help!!
Billy Trimble

Am I the only one having issues Resound Linx?

Am I the only one having issues with my iPhone 5S and Resound Linx? Apparently it states in the brochure that it supposed to be high qualitiy sound, and work great with the iPhone. I am having issues, I have to disconnect my iPhone to accept a standard landline at home or work. Secondly it takes a few seconds to connect the ringing of the cell into the hearing aids which I either loose the call by missing it or have to connect it. It's unfortunate that Apple didn't take into consideration of having the cell ring right into a persons hearing aids like one of there competitors. Furthermore whomever wrote the brochure has clearly lied it's not true what is stated in the Resound Linx around the steaming quality, and iphone connection!!

Given my personal experience with both the ReSound LiNX and Starkey Halos paired with my iPhone, i can confirm that the interplay between both hearing aids and the iPhone is far from perfect. However, I don't think it is more Apple's problem than it is ReSound or Starkey. Apple has developed technical and programming interfaces to work with a large universe of Bluetooth devices. Consequently, the responsibility for connecting really relies on the device manufacturers to craft devices that meet the connectivity standard as it is defined. That hearing aids experience struggles there doesn't surprise me. The miniaturization of circuitry and the functionality they can pack into very small devices is astonishing.....but also leads to compromise as any other micro-miniature device would have compromises.
My more immediate concern for you is that you have been told that you must disconnect your hearing aids from your iPhone before answering a land line handset. That doesn't sound right.

Time Capsule, hardwired to TWO xbox 360's, and NAT issues.

Hello All,
I currently have an older Linksys WRT54G (version 1.0 LOL) which has been working fine for years. I recently bought my son an XBOX 360 for Christmas and we went through the issues of NAT and Call of Duty, and basically I have become quite knowledgeable on this topic. I recently added a SECOND XBOX 360, as it became apparent that one would not do with three boys in the house (Plus COD is a blast on line).
So I created a second Live Account and got the two xbox's running online stably with NAT wide open on both. This required abandoning the Linksys Firmware and installing "Tomato" on the WRT54G. That works GREAT. No modifications were required for the rest of the network including...
Macbook by Wifi, Minimac Hardwired (ya ya wifi works but hardwire is better), Airport Express (used only to stream music to stereo in family room - from ANY PC/MAC running Itunes...Itunes is VERY NICE), HP printer with network adapter, 5 other PC's including a mix of VISTA, XP, XP Pro, and multiple IPHONES, A Palm Tungsten C, WII, DS and of course the two hard wired XBOXs. NO Problems. The Tomato configuration only required the modifications for the XBOXs specifically as the rest of the network settings were not change after the firmware update.
What am I interested in? I'd like to upgrade to a Time Capsule for several reasons. One Newer wifi, faster, two frequencies, backup space for growing Mac branch of our network, and as the internet sharing router. AND to be able to access the TC from the internet for file access anywhere! LOVE THAT FEATURE. This requires the TC to be the first device after the cable modem as far as I can tell at this point. (any input on this specific feature would be great).
So I want to configure the TC with the input from the Cable modem as the main distribution of the internet. Then from the other NETWORK ports connect to my 20 port router for the rest of the house, as well as to the other items currently connected at the site of the current LinkSys Router (Mac Mini, Sony TV).
Also I need to maintain the current XBOX set up with (as well as Wii) with full open NAT on both XBOXs.
My question: Anyone here currently using the TC for hardwired connectivity for an XBOX with XBOX live running with open NAT for TWO XBOXs?
The issues with NAT and TWO XBOXs is that you cannot simply use PORT FORWARDing or PORT Triggering to make sure that the traffic goes to the correct xbox. The XBOX uses specific communication ports and the ROUTER needs to keep the traffic flowing properly or you get disconnected or never get open NAT (must have for XBOX live and internet gaming). There are many write ups on using Port Forwarding for one XBOX and setting the second one in the DMZ, but this does not work all the time.
The "Tomato" firmware on the LINKSYS allows fooling the router into giving a 'pseudo static' ip address to the XBOX's by doing MAC address based reservation of an IP number and then letting the DHCP give the xbox an IP address. The MAC address based reservation makes sure that the XBOX always gets the same IP address which for some GD reason must be in order for the traffic to be routed to the correct device. (you can of course use the same MAC address reservation for any device on the network).
Second Question: For those using the TC AND a second WiFi Router to do WIRELESS connection to the XBOX - which device do you have configured as the main INTERNET sharing router? I have read hear what appears to state that the TC is the main router and the other WiFi the secondary. Thus the ROUTING is still being done by the TC and the other wifi device is being used simply as a WiFi Access point/switch. If this is the case would the firmware on the TC allow the proper routing for TWO XBOXs on the network?
Thank you,
Mike

The ports are 53, 80, 88, and 3074. Since you are trying to make two Xbox consoles use those ports and you are trying to connect to a server, what you need to do is to use Port Range Triggering. You can't use Port Range Forwarding since it will only set those ports into listening mode to the IP address you set it. So if you use Port Range Forwarding it will only be open/available to one console(the one using the IP address).
You need to use PORT RANGE TRIGGERING. Disable Port Range Forwarding and DMZ. You need to enable UPnP as well if your Linksys router have this option (other model doesn't have this option but it is said to be enabled in default settings according to their tech support).
To solve the lag problem set your MTU size to 1364. This settings will work even if you have one or multiple consoles running behind the router.

E4200 Xbox One NAT Issues (2 Xboxes)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for