E4200V2 slow wired LAN speeds

Set up my new E4200V2 last night, everything appeared to be working but while streaming videos over wired LAN I get short hiccups over wired. While streaming videos, a few second long pause is really, distracting, this is a deal breaker and my previous router (DIR-655) had no issue streaming any videos. The wiring has not changed, only the router.
So onward to trying to lock down the problem.
I set up a ping between two wired linux boxes, and get:
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=65 ttl=64 time=0.184 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=66 ttl=64 time=0.180 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=67 ttl=64 time=0.566 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.5: icmp_seq=67 ttl=64 time=10.52 ms
Whoa, 10 ms over gigabit LAN. This is crazy, but doesn't tell us much. The 10 ms was one out of hundreds of pings, so its only intermittant. This might explain the hiccups, but this router doesn't appear to log anything, so its hard to say.
Next was scp transfers, which never exceed 15MB/s, in either direction. For gigabit, wired LAN this is awful, with my previous DIR-655 I would get at the very least 40 MB/s, in all situations.
Next up, iperf. I set up iperf on the two hosts, and iperf reports reasonable gigabit speeds
3] local 192.168.0.5 port 48303 connected with 192.168.0.3 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 941 Mbits/sec
and on the iperf server:
4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.10 GBytes 940 Mbits/sec
I have tried the following solutions:
Firmware: its the newest firmware, as of last night (Feb 14) 2.0.36 build 126507 2011-12-23 01:39  
MTU - I adjusted this to 1400, 1492, 1450, set to auto, no difference
QoS - I enabled this as someone reported QoS being off would throttle certain transfers, no difference
I added both the MAC addresses of the two linux boxes as High Priority in QoS, no difference
I'm running out of things to try. Tonight I am thinking of reverting to an old firmware, doing a hard reset and seeing if it persists, and if no ideas come up in this forum, it is getting returned, 15MB/s over gigabit lan is terribly broken.
Any ideas?
Xian

Try these troubleshooting steps:
A] With the help of Cisco Connect Software (if at all you have installed the router with the help of this software)
1] Open the software and go to the option which says "Router Settings"
2] Then click on the option which says "Advanced Settings" which will take you to the router's configuration page.
3] Then click on security and disable the SPI firewall.
B] If you haven't installed Cisco Connect then you can log on to the router's user interface using it's default IP address in the browser which is 192.168.1.1 and type in 'admin' as the password leaving the username field blank. This will take you to the router's web interface and then follow steps as mentioned above to make the changes.
Hope it will help you.
Second, you can reduce the speed of the LAN card as well. 
Here is the step:
START--> right-click My Network Places and click Properties
right-click on the device and click properties
Click on the CONFIGURE button
Select the ADVANCED tab and the settings you can alter are listed on the left.
Try to make the LAN speed to manual speed.

Similar Messages

  • ThinkPad USB 3.0 Dock and X1 Carbon SLOW wired network speeds

    Got my X1 carbon, like it don't love it.  However using it on our wired network I'm getting around 20MB speeds copying files and my carbon becomes very copy when doing large 2GB file type copies.
    On my T420s with a "real" docking station I get around 150MB speeds copying the same file.
    No errors on our Cisco switches, seem speeds are locking in fine.  Is that simply the best I'm going to to over the USB 3.0 connecting to the SS port?  I can almost live with slow speeds but copy video during copies, no way.
    Am I missing something, doing something wrong, or this is what it is?  Sure hope not...

    I'm seeing the same issue with a ThinkPad W520.  When I connect my ethernet cable directly to the laptop, my internet speeds are on par with my service provider of 18 Mbps.  When I move that cable to the dock, I will only see 1.5 Mbps.  I have two displays attached to the dock and I'm running Windows 7.  I've updated the dock firmware and have installed the latest system drivers.  Is there anything else to try?

  • BEFW11S4 wired LAN speed

    I have an old BEFW11s4 wireless router that is used 99% of the time wired. The firmware on it is from July 2003, and there are no markings that I see WRT the version.
    I have tested the speed of my broadband connection thru the router and directly connected to the modem. The modem gives me 18+ mps, while thru the router its 11mps max.
    My question is, is this the max speed I can ver get from this unit or is there some setting I need to change or firmware I need to upgrade to??
    Since I am recently unemployed, I would rather not have to buy another router.
    Regards
    Toshu

    Well personally I like to keep all of my devices to the current firmware and I don't see how it is glichy, I don't see any other firmware for this router that you would want or help your problem.
    If you want that much more speed out of your router it looks like you might have to buy a new one that model is kinda old, But if money is tight like it is for every one else you can just hang on to it for a bit longer and get a new one at a later time.
    I don't think you are going to find any firmware that give you that much of a improvement, I would update your firmware though don't quote me but I think the problems with that update were resolved.
    Sorry
    I'm editing this to just say again I highly recommend getting the latest firmware.
    Message Edited by Bigmatt on 07-07-2009 11:47 AM
    GoodLuck
    Matt

  • E1200 slow wired & wireless speed through L2TP

    I have L2TP connection. Without the router, right through the cable, I have 35 Mbps download and 70 Mbps upload.
    Through the E1200 wired & wireless I have a huge speed reduction to 5-14 Mbps download/upload.
    I have the latest firmware and I did reset it after the update.
    I read a lot of information on this topic and a lot of people write that this router just can't handle higher speed through L2TP.
    Is it true? Could it be fixed?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    If you only get 5-14Mbps download/upload speed through the router, which is far beyond the rate without it then, I have to say that the router has issues. You can try to lower down the MTU settings to 1460 then do the test again using speedtest.net.If that does not resolve the issue, I suggest, get a new router, preferably a gigabit one.

  • Very slow LAN speed

    I have a "MI424WR" router. Various pages say it has speeds up to 12 mebabyte/second transfer rate, but I am only getting no more then 3mb/s ever.
    I have 1 desktop that is wired and 1 laptop that uses wireless
    Help is apprecitated

    Since you refer to slow LAN speeds, I assume you're referring to a transfer between the wired desktop PC and the wireless laptop.
    Any transfer between the two is going to be constrained by the slowest component, which is your wireless connection.
    You said you're getting "Mob/s".  I'm not clear if you're referring to megabits or megabytes.
    If that number is megabytes, that's about average for a wireless-G connections.
    MOB/sec (note the caps) * 8 bits/byte = 24Mbps  
    If you meant 3Mbps, then you're probably dealing with a wireless interference issue and should look at the usual wireless troubleshooting issues, such as changing the channel, eliminating sources of interference, etc.

  • Time Capsule with an Airport Extreme bridge resulted in slow LAN speeds

    Wondering if other people are seeing this. I am unsure if this was a result of upgrading both my TC and AEx to 7.6, but my LAN speeds had suffered in this configuration.
    1.  Comcast cable modem connected to the WAN port on my TC.
    2.  Connected an ethernet cat6 cable from the TC to my Airport Extreme, which was configured as a bridge.
    3.  My desktop was connected to the Airport Extreme.
    4.  When doing file transfers within the LAN or general internet usuage, my network speeds were extremely low.
    5.  Disconnected the cat6 cable from the TC and plugged that directly to my desktop.
    6.  Network speed jumps up by a factor of 5. LAN file transfers and internet usuage has returned to what I had expected.
    Is there a known issue where a bridged AEx conncted to another Airport "main" device will result in all machines connected via the AEx to have slow LAN speeds?
    I didn't see this issue months ago. I did less than 2 months ago upgrade our machines to the 7.6 firmware, but after experiencing some hiccups on the network, reverted back to 7.5.2.  However, the slow LAN speeds haven't gone away when the two airport machines are connected to each other.
    Any insight or advise is appreciated.

    By now, millions of users have updated to 7.6 and I cannot recall seeing a post similar to yours on this forum.
    As far as a "known issue", you would need to contact Apple regarding that.
    Suggest that you have the AirPort checked out at an Apple store if you have one near you.

  • WRT-610N - Slow LAN Speeds

    Is anybody else experiencing slow data transfer speeds via the linksys wrt-610n ethernet ports?  I stream HD video from my pc to a seagate theater+ media hub that is connected to my television.  I had a D-Link router that had 10/100 ethernet ports but recently upgraded to the wrt-610n because of it's gigabit ports and the fact that it had dual band capabilities (i have the dual band gamer adapter for another media hub one floor up).
    anyway, when i had the D-Link hooked up, I was able to stream HD video perfectly via a wired network connection.  both audio and video were perfect.  since i hooked up the linksys, i now get perfect video for 30 minutes or so and then it starts to get choppy.  after about 45 - 50 minutes it's so choppy it's almost unwatchable.
    since the only thing that's changed is the router, i'm assuming that's the culprit.  does that make any sense to anybody else?  i can't believe it, simply because the ethernet ports on this router are "faster" than the last one ... anyways ... any help would be greatly appreciated.

    porty -
    I was aware that the NIC in the seagate wasn't a gigabit card.  My issue is that the linksys router, for some reason, isn't transferring as fast as my older D-Link 10/100 router.  It seems like there is something wrong when two wired devices try to transfer data from one to the other.
    Anyways, thanks for the response ... I appreciate it.

  • New FiOS GigE Wireless 'N' Router has slowed our wireless speed to a crawl...need help!

    This past Tuesday I installed the new N router.  Also, we upgraded to FiOS Quantum 75/35 (previously 15/5).  That was activated the following day.  I can't complain about the internet speed to our pc since it's wired.  Speed tests showed we were getting what was advertised. :-)
    For the wifi, I can't figured out for the life of me what's causing our devices (e.g., our Nexus 7 tablets) to have a link speeds of 65Mbps one minute and then drop down to 5 or even 1.  The same situation was happening with my HTC Incredible II phone, but I think that connection was tapping out at 54Mbps.  The bottom would just drop out of the signal for some reason.  Other times we couldn't even connect back in.  The devices would say they're not in range even when they were in front of the router.  Not sure if I fubarred the router install or what?  I just swapped out the current Fios router for this new one.  Pretty straightforward.  At first, I logged into the router software with the defaults, but then I changed the the username, pswd, SSID, etc. to match what I used previously.  I thought it was working fine the night of the install but not so much after Fios got bumped up in speed the following day.  Maybe just a co-inky-dink?
    I know you never get the same speeds compared to a wired pc but this seems worse (wifi-wise) than before the new router came along.  I've read that the 'N' routers can be finicky to set-up to run properly.  Maybe a setting or two is off?
    I don't know if the fact that my son's netbook's wifi card is only b/g compatible would slow our network down?  At this point I'm grasping at straws!  I talked with tech support last night for 40 mins to no avail.  I got the usual story about wireless devices running slower than wired ones, that these smaller devices aren't capable to maintaining higher speeds (which I'm not sure I agree with 100%), the more active devices you have slows down your network, etc, etc.  I get all that.  But something is going on or actually, it's not.  LOL!
    Why I don't agree with the above statement I mentioned is because I have my tablet at work now and the wifi speed is 54Mbps and it's constant.  So it seems to have no problems with this speed, unlike what I was told over the phone.
    Let me know if I can provide any further technical details that'll make it easier to help diagnose our wifi issues.
    Thanks for listening to me whine ,
    -bill

    Thanks for the help, Hubrisnxs.
    Here's an update since I got home:
    Nexus7 (N7) took a min or so to connect to wifi when I got home.  When it did, speed said 65Mbps.  So I ran speedtest.net and got 27/20.  Shortly after that I tried again but it was hesitating.  I checked the speed and it was down to 5Mbps.  Brought it upstairs to router and pc, and eventually it was back to 65.  Ran speed test a few more times with similar results.  I did notice that the connection would intermittently come and go.  Not sure why.  Looking at the wifi section  on my N7, it says our network is out of range and the N7 is 2' from the router.  Every now and then my network will go to the top of the list and it'll say it's obtaining ip address, then secured with wpa/wpa2 psk and it's locked in.  So I hit the connect button and it's out of range again.  Of course, while I was typing it decided to connect after 10-15 mins of trying/nothing.  Says, signal strength excellent, 52 Mbps.  Spoke too soon.  It's off again.  Crap!  Back on again but speed was 19, now 5.
    I did check router settings and this is what I have:
    Performance mode ('n')
    WPA2 AES
    Channel 1
    nonbroadcasting SSID
    Maybe I'll try channel 11 next.....
    Just for the heck of it, here is the results from verizon speed test on our pc (wired of course):
    Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
    SendBufferSize set to [261360]
    running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 34.66Mb/s
    running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 84.24Mb/s
    ------ Client System Details ------
    OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1
    Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.6.0_37
    ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------
    Client Receive Window detected at 1045440 bytes.
    622 Mbps OC-12 link found.
    Link set to Half Duplex mode
    Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic.
    Good network cable(s) found
    Normal duplex operation found.
    Web100 reports the Round trip time = 41.51 msec; the Packet size = 1452 Bytes; and
    There were 72 packets retransmitted, 2254 duplicate acks received, and 2281 SACK blocks received
    The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time
    This connection is sender limited 91.83% of the time.
    This connection is network limited 8.17% of the time.
    Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:
    RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON
    RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON
    RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF
    RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF
    RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON
    Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable
    Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End
    Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address
    Server says [] but Client says []
    -bill

  • MI424WR – Rev I LAN Speeds

           I'm trying to figure out if the LAN speed on Actiontec MI424WR – Rev I is it 10/100 or 10/100/1000 ? If it is 10/100/1000 how to I go about getting verizon to send me a router that works correctly, Asking because I just got off the with them and they could not even tell me the speed of the LAN ports, all they wanted to talk about was my internet speed I did try to
    explain that my question had nothing to do with that to no avail.
    Thanks for the assistance

    You can download the Rev I user manual here:
    http://www.verizon.com/cs/groups/public/documents/adacct/vz_bhr3_rev_i_user_manual.pdf
    If you look on page 9 you'll see "Integrated wired networking with 4-port 10/100/1000 Mbps Ethernet switch and MoCA."
    And on page 15: 
    The LAN Ethernet ports connect devices to the FiOS Router via Ethernet cables 
    to create a local area network (LAN). The LAN Ethernet ports are 10/100/1000 
    Mbps auto-sensing ports, and either a straight-through or crossover Ethernet 
    cable can be used when connecting devices to the ports.
    In addition, as I mentioned earlier, you should be able to see the labels 10/100/1000 around the LAN ports on the router, showing the LED indication at which speed a device is connected.
    Both On=1G!
    It's sad if Verizon tech support doesn't know this, and I can't understand that, but it is what it is.

  • Wired LAN for Canon MP620

    I have had mixed success once I upgraded my MacBook Pro 17CoreDuo to Snow Leopard with my Canon MP620 in my office. In Leopard, it was set up as a wired LAN, with a cable running from my Airport Extreme Base Station to my printer. Scanning was nice and speedy.
    All I can seem to do now is get it set up wirelessly, and the scanning is way too slow.
    What is the proper way to set up a wired LAN with Airport Extreme?
    I have gone so far as to get the printer on the same IP settings as my Mac.
    Mac IP is 192.168.1.55 Printer IP is 192.168.1.70
    Mac Subnet Mask is 255.255.255.0 Printer Subnet Mask is the same
    Mac Router setting is 192.168.1.1 Printer Router Setting is the same
    On the Printer, it is set to Wired LAN, and the wired LAN settings are all reading correctly.
    I can print as long as I keep the USB connected to the printer. As soon as I try to remove it, it shows up as "offline".

    When you have the printer connected via wired or wireless, you will have to add another print queue. The USB queue is purely for connecting from the Mac to the printer via USB, so this is why it will show offline when the USB is disconnected.
    To add the network printer on 10.6, you don't use More Printer > Canon IJ Printer menu like you did with 10.5. Instead, you need to select the Default browser view and wait. The printer will eventually appear in the Default view with the Kind column showing 'canonijnetwork'. Note that you will probably see the scanner appear very quickly, because it uses a different protocol to advertise itself on the network.
    Note that the printer will only advertise itself on the network if the v10.26 driver is installed. The version 10.19 driver included with 10.6 does not work across the network. If you open the Options & Supplies button for the USB printer queue, it will show which version you are using under the General tab.
    Note also, if you have the Parallels VM application installed, this can stop the network printer from appearing in the Default browser view.
    HTH
    Pahu

  • Unable to see Shared Folder / Drop Box on wired LAN

    I am unable to connect to another Mac on my wired LAN (Netgear wndr3700), and it is unable to connect to my machine. We cannot see each others’ Public Folder / Drop Box.
    We can see each others Macs in the Shared section of the Finder’s sidebar, but trying to connect fails: “The server … may not exist or it is unavailable at this time…”
    Both are running 10.6.4 Snow Leopard SL. No Windows machines on the LAN - so this should be AFP only.
    We can see and connect to another Mac running 10.4.11 Tiger with no problem. BUT it is unable to connect to either 10.6.4 machine.
    Firewall on both machines: On; File Sharing (AFP) set to “Allow incoming connections”; Stealth mode Enabled (toggling doesn’t change); “Automatically allow signed software to receive incoming connections” is Off; “Block all incoming connections” is Off. Some other apps and services are set to Block… (krb5kdc, numbed, smbd…) AppleFileServer is set to Allow.
    Sharing: File Sharing Service only is On:
    Hard Drive - Everyone - Read & Write
    Users - Everyone - Read Only
    ~ (My Home Directory) - Everyone - Read Only
    Public - Everyone - Read & Write
    Drop Box - Everyone - Write only
    Thanks for any suggestions.

    It isn't directly related to the firewall, I'm having the same problem between two up to date machines, and to be sure, I have disabled the firewall on both. however, If i connect using the connect to server dialogue, I get through just fine. I believe it could be a dns resolution problem.
    strike that.
    Just tested, check in advanced network settings, and if you have any wins servers listed, remove them.
    krb5kdc needs to be allowed to accept connections, for me it popped up in little snitch when it was authenticating.

  • How can I get my wired LAN to share my iMac's wireless internet connection

    Hi. (sorry for the long-winded posting below. I really struggled to explain what I'm trying to do, but would really appreciate any help from people who can recognise what I'm aiming for!)
    I've seen several postings about sharing internet connection, but none (I think) which sort my problem.
    I have a wired LAN with 3 Macs connected to a router, and the router to a cable modem and the internet. All working fine. All Macs have internet access.
    I'm considering ditching my broadband provider, and so looking for a replacement configuration, at least for the short term.
    So, I'd like to change the arrangement, connecting one of the Macs to the internet (through a local free WIFI hotspot) using it's airport card (that bit is done) and enable the other two Macs to share that connection via the router.
    I've turned internet sharing on, and share connection from Built-In ethernet, on the internet connected Mac. But whatever
    Has anyone got this setup working?
    PB
    Intel iMac 4,1 (early 2006)   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   1Gb SDRAM, 2GHz

    You can share a connection through the router or you can share a connection from the Mac via Internet Sharing, but you can't share an already shared connection.

  • Wired-LAN B&W G3 no longer "seen" by Airport network

    For the past 5+ years I've had my old B&W G3 connected to my Airport Extreme via its wired LAN port. It was always accessible  from my G5 and just worked flawlessly. Last winter my G5 died & I was forced to use the G3 & therefore had to disconnect it from the AE and use it directly.
    Well, now I can't get my G5 to "see" the G3 via AE anymore. I hooked up everything as it was before but can't seem to get the network to "see" the G3. As I said it's been 5+ years since I did this initially so if anyone can think of something I missed I would surely appreciate the insight.
    FWIW as best as I recall, I initially just connected the B&W G3 to the AE's Ethernet LAN port, went to the Finder and selected Network & the G3 showed up. After typing my password I was able to access the G3. I remember thinking at the time "wow, that was easy!
    This is not an internet connection related problem.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Tim

    Hello Tesserax
    That did it.
    Thanks
    Tim

  • Wired LAN on iPhone

    Hey guys,
    I was trying to use office internet on my laptop to access net on iPhone. I have a wired LAN.
    Any clues on how to do it if at all its possible???

    Anirudh Hingle wrote:
    I have already followed his blog but i think he is explaining the process if one has a data cord or something...
    The iPhone cannot connect to the Internet through it's cable the only way to do it is via Wi-Fi through your laptop this is the process that he was explaining.
    m not sure whether it will work for wired lan
    While your Network at work is wired and thus off-limits to the iPhone 9due to connection limitations) you can use your laptop to create an wireless access point thus giving the iPhone a way in.
    The process described in the link is the only setup possible with you current hardware to be able to do this.
    If you are having trouble setting this up my recommendation would be to just invest in a Wi-Fi router (or get your work to), you can get them for very little cost and they will save you from having to play around with network settings and quite possibly compromising your work's network security.
    You could get anything from a USB dongle style to an AirPort Express or even An AirPort Extreme base Station (just to name Apple's products that will work with this)
    This would greatly simplify your task for you
    otherwise if you still want to use the hardware you have available to you i would recommend hopping onto Microsofts discussion forum and ask about creating a Wireless access point with your Laptop as they would be better suited to answer those questions since they are Microsoft related. That link unfortunatley is the best laid out and informative one i know of without me writing one up myself.
    I feel that what you are really trying to acheive is a mixed network topology system in a Multiple star network layout (which is similar to what i run at home but mines more of a mesh architecture).
    With Wired and Wi-Fi options both integrated and the best way to acheive this is with a Wi-Fi router
    (wish you could draw diagrams for usage on here would make life a lot easier )
    Message was edited by: r.cloud

  • [Solved] Failed to connect internet by Wired LAN, but wifi is working.

    After installation of gnome in archlinux, I enabled NetworkManager.service. I can successfully connect to wireless network. But I can't connect to internet through wired LAN. It shows wired connection established in NetworkManager. But no internet connection is accessible. I found that when connected to wired network, running "dhcpcd" in terminal shows messages like "dhcpcd[13584]: enp19s0: reject NAK via 192.168.1.1" and finally timed out.
    Can anyone give any suggestion ?
    Last edited by rasr11 (2015-04-12 01:50:44)

    It seems like a problem in dhcp, you could try setting a static route in network manager, just copy the route of your wifi conection. TheSaint was asking for the output of the shell commands posted by him to diagnose the network problem.
    Last edited by hydrosIII (2014-11-06 06:11:09)

Maybe you are looking for

  • Background run of a report

    Hi all, I want my report to run in background becoz it is taking more time in front time....when i have given some selection screen variants and click on F9...it is not going directly to background run...but instead it is executing in the front end a

  • Row currency has changed since the user interface was rendered on create

    Hi all, I am getting "Row currency has changed since the user interface was rendered. The expected row key was oracle.jbo.Key" error on create action. Use case is simple. There is view table and a create button. When I click to the create button i am

  • Reader uninstall failure / will not reinstall

    I have a corporate distribution version of Reader X that I installed on a Windows Server 2008 R2 (64bit) Remote Desktop Services Server (formally Terminal Server).  The version I am using is for Windows Server 2008.   I have two of these servers one

  • Invoice blocking due to tolerance limit at header Invoice Value.

    Hi, Our client needs to have tolerance limit set for total Invoice value.The Invoice contains multiple line items.The tolerance may be % or $ value.The standard setting which I know is for each Invoice line item but not for cummulative.The issue is i

  • Negate colors of a window in openbox

    I have been running ubuntu for the past few months with compiz enabled, and I have really enjoyed the ability to negate the colors of any window with Super-n. It's great for readability at night. Anyway, now that I am back on my arch machine, I am wo