E5 with missing functionality?

I've had Nokia phones since the 5110, and so there are a number of functions I expect to find in a nokia phone.  Having recently "upgraded" from a 6500slide to an E5, I am somewhat stunned that certain functionality appears to have dissappeared.  For instance:
Automatic keyguard.  Gone.
Scientific calculator.  Gone.
Stopwatch and countdown timer.  Gone.
Ability to show menus in a different style and re-organise them.  Gone.
Ability to just turn off the **bleep** themes and have a readable phone screen.  Gone.
Ability to turn off the **bleep** camera noise.  Gone.
What on earth are Nokia playing at?  The E5 is a nice enough phone, and the UMS functionality (Signal Boost on the menu) is really effective and something I use a lot, but the loss of what have been standard features for the last decade is inexcusable.
Anyone from Nokia care to comment?

Auto keypad lock.  any clue where that is? I've looked and looked for it.
Scientific calculator.  The one on my 6500 slide was extremely useful for odd little calcs here and there.  As a mechanical engineer, it's something I have to do all the time, and not having to carry a seperate calculator was excelent.
Carbon black is not an option on the phone I have.  Could really do with being able to download some other themes, but the phone just takes me to the Orange store, where there are no themes. Grr.
And as for the camera sound... well, how come the E7, which is a newer phone, has the ability to turn off it's camera sound? It is not against the law to not have a camera sound. There are times when I need to be fairly discreet taking a photograph (again, part of my work, nothing pervy) and having a massive "BEEEEEP" or "CHER-CHIIIING" every time is really unhelpful.
I just don't understand how a modern smartphone can have less functionality than a 3-year old non-smart-phone.  I'm somewhat dissappointed with it TBH.

Similar Messages

  • Missing Function within VC01N Generic Object Services (simple note)

    We want to use the generic object services (GOS) within transaction VC01N. But we are missing the function to enter only a simple note. Behind the GOS Icon within VC01N menu step: Create -> Create note  is not available.
    This is different to other transactions with GOS functionality like VA02. There the menu step: Create -> Create note   is available.
    And idea why it is designed in this way and how we can make the simple note function available in CV01N.
    Many Thanks in advance for your help,.
    Klaus
    Edited by: Klaus Reitz on Sep 10, 2008 7:56 PM

    We want to use the generic object services (GOS) within transaction VC01N. But we are missing the function to enter only a simple note. Behind the GOS Icon within VC01N menu step: Create -> Create note  is not available.
    This is different to other transactions with GOS functionality like VA02. There the menu step: Create -> Create note   is available.
    And idea why it is designed in this way and how we can make the simple note function available in CV01N.
    Many Thanks in advance for your help,.
    Klaus
    Edited by: Klaus Reitz on Sep 10, 2008 7:56 PM

  • Packaging data is not saved in document draft (missing functionality)

    Dear all,
    Packaging data, usually typed with delivery note, is not saved together with Delivery Note draft (No matter the draft is saved manually or automatically by approval procedure).
    I have tested on SBO 2005B latest patch, 2007B latest patch, and 8.8 version, they all do not save packaging data in draft.
    The draft related tables for packaging (DRF7, DRF8) are already existed in SBO, I encourage to get this missing functionality back.
    My customers are highly needed for this function for better operation flow.
    It would be appreciated if this request could be implemented in the near future patch.
    Thanks in advance

    Have also just discovered that this functionality is missing, although we were going to be using it when saving an AR Invoice as Draft. This is a major hole and is going to cause a big issue for a current implementation where this method was going to be used to create 'Split Deliveries' without making the account postings and allow Despatch paperwork for the Shipping company to be printed. The solution was going to be extremely simple, but now potentially is going to result in a substantial SDK development.
    It would be useful to know whether there is any likelihood that it will be resolved in the near future, i.e. in a patch for 2007A SP1 or 8.8.

  • Mail for Exchange Missing Functions E71 v E72

    Hi All,
    So I have been using an E71 with Mail for Exhcange for some time now and find it is very good.
    However
    I have an E72 with Mail for Exhcange already installed on the device BUT it clearly has missing functions whihc I had on the previous version on Mail fo Exchangeo n the E71.
    These are
    Comp Directory - Very useful for looking up contacts details from the GAB
    View Log in Mail for Exchange. This is useful to see what the error is for a reason why the device may not be syncing with the MS Exchange Server.
    Full resync in mail for Exchange. This again useful for support as other users will tell you that if the two systems have got their wires twisted, a full resync can fix the problem!
    What version of the software do I have? Helps for future support and upgrades.
    So Mr Nokia Software Developer. When can we have these functions added? Do we have to drop this software tool and device....
    MODERATOR'S NOTE:
    We have edited your post. Please be advised that feedback on Nokia devices are accepted in the forum provided that they are written in an acceptable manner such as tone and the choice of words.

    As far as the version number goes - it's not a misprint, it's just they way Nokia numbering scheme works.  build 2.09 is version 2.9.  Similarly in Nokia Maps build 3.04 is called version 3.4... go figure.
    Lumia 920, Lumia 800
    Nokia N8-00 (NAM, Product Code: 059C8T6), Symbian Belle, Type RM-596, 111.030.0609
    Nokia 5800 XpressMusic (NAM, Product Code: 0577454) Software v51.2.007, Type RM-428

  • OWB bugs, missing functionality and the future of OWB

    I'm working with OWB for some time now and there are a lot of rough edges to discover. Functionality and stability leave a lot to be desired. Here's a small and incomplete list of things that annoy me:
    Some annoying OWB bugs (OWB 10g 10.1.0.2.0):
    - The debugger doesn't display the output parameters of procedures called in pre-mapping processes (displays nothing, treats values as NULL). The mapping itself works fine though.
    - When calling selfmade functions within an expression OWB precedes the function call with a constant "Functions." which prevents the function from being executed and results in an error message
    - Occasionally OWB cannot open mappings and displays an error message (null pointer exception). In this case the mapping cannot be opened anymore.
    - Occasionally when executing mappings OWB doesn't remember changes in mappings even when the changes were committed and deployed
    - When using aggregators in mappings OWB scrambles the order of the output attributes
    - The deployment of mappings sometimes doesn't work. After n retries it works without having changed anything in the mapping
    - When recreating an external table directly after dropping the table OWB recreates the external table but always displays both an error message and a success message.
    - In Key Lookups the screen always gets garbled when selecting an attribute as a join condition
    - Usage of constants results in aborts in the debugger
    - When you reconcile a table used in a key lookup the lookup condition sometimes changes. OWB seems to remember only the position of the lookup condition attribute but not the name.
    - In the process of validating a mapping often changes in the mapping get lost and errors occur like 'Internal Errors' or 'Null Pointer Exceptions'.
    - When you save the definition of external tables OWB always adds 2 whitespace columns to the beginning of all the lines following 'ORGANISATION EXTERNAL'. If you save a lot of external table definitions you get files with hundreds of leading whitespaces.
    Poor or missing functionality:
    - No logging on the level of single records possible. I'd like the possibility to see the status of each single record in each operator like using 'verbose data' in PowerCenter
    - The order of the attributes cannot be changed. This really pisses me off expecially if operators like the aggregator scramble the order of attributes.
    - No variables in expressions possible
    - Almost unusable lookup functionality (no cascading lookups, no lookup overrides, no unconnected lookups, only equal condition in key lookups)
    - No SQL overrides in soruces possible
    - No mapplets, shared containers or any kind a reusable transformations
    - No overview functionality for mappings. Often it's very hard to find a leftover operator in a big mapping.
    - No copy function for attributes
    - Printing functionality is completely useless
    - No documentation functionality for mappings (reports)
    - Debugger itself needs debugging
    - It's very difficult to mark connections between attributes of different operations. It's almost impossible to mark a group of connections without marking connections you don't want to mark.
    I really wonder which of the above bugs and mssing functionality 'Paris' will address. From what I read about 'Paris' not many if at all. If Oracle really wants to be a competitor (with regard to functionality) to Informatica, IBM/Ascential etc. they have a whole lot of work to do or purchase Informatica or another of the leading etl tool
    vendors.
    What do you think about OWB? Will it be a competitor for the leading etl tools or just a cheap database add on and become widely used like SAB BW not for reasons of technology or functionality but because it's cheap?
    Looking forward to your opinions.
    Jörg Menker

    Thanks to you two for entertaining my thoughts so far. Let me respond to you latest comments.
    Okay, lets not argue which one is better.. when a tool is there .. then there are some reasons to be there...But the points raised by Jorg and me are really very annoying. Overall I agree with both yours and Jorg's points (and I did not think it was an argument...merely sharing our observations with each other (;^)
    The OWB tool is not as mature as Informatica. However, Informatica has no foothold in the database engine itself and as I mentioned earlier, is still "on the outside looking in..." The efficiency and power of set-based activity versus row-based activity is substantial.
    Looking at it from another way lets take a look at Microstrategy as a way of observing a technical strategy for product development. Microstrategy focused on the internals (the engine) and developed it into the "heavy-lifting" tool in the industry. It did this primarily by leveraging the power of the backend...the database and the hosting server. For sheer brute force, it was champion of the day. It was less concerned with the pretty presentation and more concerned with getting the data out of the back-end so the user didn't have to sit there for a day and wait. Now they have begun to focus on the presentation part.
    Likewise this seems to be the strategy that Oracle has used for OWB. It is designed around the database engine and leverages the power of the database to do its work. Informatica (probably because it needs to be all things to all people) has tended to view the technical offerings of the database engine as a secondary consideration in its architectural approach and has probably been forced to do so more now that Oracle has put themselves in direct competition with Informatica. To do otherwise would make their product too complex to maintain and more vendor-specific.
    I am into the third data warehousing/data migration project and my previous two have been on Informatica (3 years on it).I respect your experience and your opinions...you are not a first timer. The tasks we have both had to solve and how we solved them with these tools are not necessarily the same. Could be similar in instances; could be quite different.
    So the general tendency is to evaluate the tool and try to see how things that were needed to be done in my previous projects can be done with this tool. I am afraid to say .. I am still not sure how these can be implemented in OWB. The points raised by us are probably the fall out of this deficiency.One observation that I would make is that in my experience, calls to the procedural language in the database engine have tended to perform very poorly with Informatica. Informatica's scripting language is week. Therefore, if you do not have direct usability of a good, strong procedural language to tackle some complicated tasks, then you will be in a pickle when the solution is not well suited to a relational-based approach. Informatica wants you to do most things outside of the database (in the map primarily). It is how you implement the transformation logic. OWB is built entirely around the relational, procedural, and ETL components in the Oracle database engine. That is what the tool is all about.
    If cost is the major factor for deciding a tool then OWB stands far ahead...Depends entirely on the client and the situation. I have implemented solutions for large companies and small companies. I don't use a table saw to cut cake and I don't use a pin knife to fall trees. Right tool for the right job.
    ...thats what most managers do .. without even looking how in turn by selecting such a tool they make the life tough for the developers.Been there many times. Few non-technical managers understand the process of tool evaluation and selection and the value a good process adds to the project. Nor do they understand the implications of making a bad choice (cost, productivity, maintainability).
    The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.If you are primarily a GUI-based implementer that is true. However, I have often found that when I have been brought in to fix performance problems with Informatica implementations that the primary problem is usually with the way that the developer implemented it. Too often I have found that the developer understands how to implement logic in the GUI component (the Designer/Maps and Sessions) with a complete lack of understanding of how all this activity will impact load performance (they don't understand how the database engine works.) For example, a strong feature in Informatica is the ability to override the default SQL statement generated by Informatica. This was a smart design decision on Informatica's part. I have frequently had to go into the "code" and fix bad joins, split up complex operations, and rip out convoluted logic to get the maps to perform within a reasonable load window. Too often these developers are only viewing the problem through the "window" of the tool. They are not stepping back and look at the problem in the context of the overall architecture. In part Informatica forces them to do this. Another possible factor is they probably don't know better.
    "One tool...one solution"
    Microstrategy until recently had been suffering from that same condition of not allowing the developer to create the actual query). OWB engineers need to rethink their strategy on overriding the SQL.
    The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.In some ways yes. If you do a head-to-head comparison of the GUI then yes. In other ways OWB is better (Informatica does not measure up when you compare it with all of the architectural features that the Oracle database engine offers). They need to fix the bugs and annoyances though.
    .. but even the GUI of Informatica is better than OWB and gives the developer some satisfaction of working in it.Believe me I feel your pain. On the other hand, I have suffered from Informatica bugs. Ever do a port from one database eingine to another just to have it convert everything into multi-byte? Ever have it re-define your maps to parallel processing threads when you didn't ask it to?
    Looking at the technical side of things I can give you one fine example ... there is no function in Oracle doing to_integer (to_number is there) but Informatica does that ... Hmm-m-m...sorry, I don't get the point.
    The style of ETL approach of Informatica is far more appealing.I find it unnecessarily over-engineered.
    OWB has two advantages : It is basically free of cost and it has a big brother in Oracle.
    It is basically free of cost...When you are another "Microsoft", you can throw your weight around. The message for Informatica is "don't bite the hand that feeds you." Bad decisions at the top.
    Regards,
    Dan Phillips

  • Missing Function Modules - EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS & READ_STAMP

    Hi Gurus,
    When i am generating EWA for system in Solution Manager, i am getting the error
    under Service Preparation
    - Missing Function Modules
    1. EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS
    2. READ_STAMP
    *In the satellite system,tcode-sdccn*
    Below are the errors:
    1) EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS : no matching interface found
    function module not found
    EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS : funcname /SDF/MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS , module 000156
    2) READ_RFC_LIST : # of imp params in funcmod < # of imp params in mod 000152
    READ_RFC_LIST : inconsistency in # of imp params found for mod 000152
    READ_RFC_LIST : non-default imp param IF_ANONYMIZE is not passed to mod 000152
    READ_STAMP : no matching interface found
    function module not found
    READ_STAMP : funcname /BDL/READ_STAMP , module 000153
    Can Anybody help me to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    Ashok

    The modules EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS, READ_STAMP and READ_RFC_LIST are supplied with the next version of ST-PI, which is currently scheduled to be released for customers on December 15. I can only ask you to ignore the error until after the next version of ST-PI has been installed on the system.
    Please be informed that the errors are not critical and will disappear
    by installing the latest ST-PI which will be release around december the
    15th 2008.
    Edited by: Felipe Pitta on Dec 2, 2008 12:22 PM

  • Getting a "Business partner not found with partner function type requester"

    Hi There,
    After I add a text item to the shopping cart using the SHOP t-code, I get a message "Business partner not found with partner function type requester" What could be causing this and how can I rectify this problem.
    Please help mas this is an urgent issue.
    Thanks,
    Grace

    Hi Grace,
    First check :
    1- transaction : CRM_OM_BP_INTEGRATE
    select org structure where your user is and check that you have green lights (no missing address....)
    2- Run transaction USERS_GEN
    Select check user
    Is everything correct or does the user need to be repaired ?
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • Can't relase Process Order with missing parts

    Hi seniors
    I want to relase my process order with missing parts. it is available in PP but not in PI in my system.
    help plz

    Hi
    1. Kindly check the setting for thePlant / Order type combination in the OPJKDefine Checking Control
    2. In this check for the fucntion 1 and also 2 Business function.
    3. Check the indicator for the ""Release material"" in the material avaialability screen.
    Reg
    Dsk

  • Camera Raw 6.6 missing functions

    I use PSE 10 with Camera Raw 6.6. It appears to be missing functions such as the paint brush and the ability to mask. I've tried downloading it again, but the additional functions did not reappear. Any suggestions?

      Masking is only available in conjunction with sharpening under the detail tab. Hold down the alt key whist dragging the making slider to see how sharpening will be applied to edges.
    There is no adjustment brush tool available in the Elements version of camera raw. It’s only available in CS6 or Lightroom.
     

  • CVI Distibution with Database Functions

    I am working with CVI2012.  I have an application that uses the SQL toolkit.  I made a distribution and installed it on a target machine (Windows 7 with the CVI2012 runtime engine).  However when I install the application on another target (also a Windows 7 machine and also with the CVI2012 runtime engine) I cannot not initialize the database.  The application fails on a call to DBInit(DB_INIT_MULTITHREADED).  I get an error of -100: DB_FAILED_TO_LOAD_DLL.   (I am using  SQL Anywhere 11.)  I know that the ODBC configuration is the same on both targets and I can access the DB manually through Interactive SQL.     
    I am baffled by this.  After some searching I found that the file "cvidb32.dll" was not in the system32 directory so I copied that over.  Still no joy.  (I would also expect this to be installed when I installed the RTE.  I did not have to manually copy this file on to the computer where the application does work.)  I have checked the forums here have not found a solutionl.  One post discussed running sqldistsupp.exe after the installer.  I tried this and got an error "Driver's ConfigDSN, ConfigDriver or ConfigTranslator failed in function SQLConfigDataSource".  Another post suggested simply adding CVISQLShared.msm to the installer.  I tried this but it did not fixt the problem.  I also tried downloading the SQL Distribution Toolkit help and it turns out the file has no content under the help topics.
    Clearly something is missing but I don't know what.  I tried running Dependency Walker to find the missing DLL but it did not show anything was missing. 
    Thoughts?
    Thanks.

    I have not distributed any applications with sql functionality, but looking at the following links it seems it can be a little tricky:
    Why Do I Get Errors When I Try to Run a Distribution of a LabWindows™/CVI™ Program Which Uses the SQ...
    LabWindows™/CVI SQL Toolkit 2.2 Readme
    S. Eren BALCI
    www.aselsan.com.tr

  • Linetime chart with area functionality

    I'm using timeline charts when I want to display graph over time and I have few missing samples.
    Not like simple line graph, the timeline compensate on the holes.
    No I want to use area chart and, again, I have the problem with missing samples.
    Is there a way to combine area chart and timeline functionality?
    Is there a way to transform the linetime's lines to areas?

    Did you mean a Trendline? If that is the case, right click on any of the areas in the area chart and select Trendlines from the context menu.

  • Having problem with to_lob function

    Hi,
    Oracle DB version: 10.2.0.1.0
    Tools being used: SQL Developer and SQLPlus (I have tried the query on both)
    Create table test
    col_xml LONG
    ...Note: We cannot convert this column to CLOB permanently because we just don't have the right to do that. :-(
    Now, the problem is, I'm trying to convert this LONG into a CLOB using the TO_LOB function but still getting this error:
    select TO_LOB(col_xml) from test;
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got LONGBy the way, our main goal is to query this column so that we could filter the rows that we need.
    Sort of:
    select TO_LOB(col_xml) from test where TO_LOB(col_xml) like '%criteria%';Have I missed something or any idea on how to make my goal possible. The TO_LOB function is pretty simple but I don't know why it doesn't work in our my environment.
    Suggestion/Ideas/Links to learning materials is high appreciated (Prefer oracle sites, message boards and forums are blocked by the firewall :-( ).
    Thanks.

    Spongebob wrote:
    Follow up question: This TO_LOB function looks simple and easy to use but as shown above in my post it throws an error message. Have I missed something or is there something in our environment that affected the behavior of this function?Have a look at Oracle® Database SQL Language Reference.
    There are several limitations with this function. It boils down to the following:
    "<i>Before using this function, you must create a LOB column to receive the converted LONG values. To convert LONG values, create a CLOB column. To convert LONG RAW values, create a BLOB column.</i>"
    So in other words, this function needs a destination LOB to write the LONG content into. It does not dynamically create the destination LOB/CLOB.
    So you cannot do this as there is no explicit LOB definition to receive the converted LONG content:
    SQL> select TO_LOB(text) from all_views where owner = 'SYSTEM' and view_name = 'PRODUCT_PRIVS';
    select TO_LOB(text) from all_views where owner = 'SYSTEM' and view_name = 'PRODUCT_PRIVS'
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got LONGBut if we create a destination LOB, we can use the function. E.g.
    SQL> create table view_text( view_name varchar2(30), view_sql clob );
    Table created.
    SQL> insert into view_text select view_name, TO_LOB(text) from all_views where owner = 'SYSTEM' and view_name = 'PRODUCT_PRIVS';
    1 row created.
    SQL> The bottom line to this is: LONG IS AN EVIL DATA TYPE.
    It should not be used. It dates back to Oracle 7. We are now at 11g. Several versions later. Still using the LONG data type in applications should be dealt with swiftly and harshly using the old lead pipe. Even a legacy app would have undergone several updates since Oracle v7. And that would have provided ample opportunity to convert from the horrible LONG data type to LOB.

  • Incorrect parameter with CALL FUNCTION - WE19

    hi! All
    while creating IDOC through WE19 - Start Inbound it creates IDOC with Status - 64."IDoc ready to be transferred to application" "No filters , No conversion , No version change ."
    Incorrect parameter with CALL FUNCTION
    This parameter was "MASSAVEINFOS".
    but i have Included this parameter in my Function module.
    INPUT_METHOD TYPE INPUTMETHD
    MASS_PROCESSING TYPE MASS_PROC
    NO_APPLICATION_LOG LIKE SY-DATAR
    MASSAVEINFOS LIKE MASSSAVINF
    whats the mistake i have done.
    Regards
    Kv

    That will not be possible KV, as the call to the FM is not being made, as far as i see you have completed the needed settings.
    As i do not have access to an SAP system, i suggest that you try below,
    1) Go to WE19, enter the IDOC number and F8.
    2) In this screen, click on Inbound function module.
    3) In the field for inbound function module press F4, it should list your FM name here if all the necessary we42/82/57, BD51 and WE20 have been done correctly.
    Another thing that you can try is, on WE19,
    1) Idoc Number F8
    2) /h - to start Debug
    3) Now click on Standard inbound, in the debug mode press F5 once.
    4) Now put a break point on all message statement
    See where exactly the message of wrong FM is being thrown, it will most probably be after a select statement on one of the tables associated with WE42/82/57/BD51 etc. With this you will where you have missed out.
    All the best !!!
    Regards,
    Chen
    Edited by: Chen K V on Mar 18, 2010 8:55 AM

  • Is there a way to create a report of topics with missing images?

    If I move all images in a project to a different directory,
    is there a way to print out which topics have missing images?
    I would like to have all images in the HTMLHelp folder, since
    this is the default folder that images are copied to when I insert
    them from another source folder. If I move all images from my
    "Images" folder to the HTMLHelp folder, is there a way to generate
    a report that lists all topics with missing images?
    Normally, I've been using the "Images" report to determine
    which topics used that image before I moved them, but I'd like a
    report that denotes which topics are missing images, period.
    thanks in advance,
    ChristyG

    Hi ChristyG
    As long as you only move the images within the RoboHelp
    project, none should go missing!
    Unfortunately, I don't believe you have an easy report at
    your disposal that will advise which topics contain missing images.
    Cheers... Rick

  • Error while replacing IF statements with DECODE function in procedure

    Hi All,
    I have created a procedure which has nested IF statements. Now I want to replace the IF statements with DECODE functions to improve performance.
    Procedure:
    IF (var_int_sev = '0')
    THEN
    var_sev := '2';
    ELSE
    SELECT sev
    INTO var_int_sev
    FROM errorconfig
    WHERE errorcode = var_errorcode;
    var_sev := var_int_sev;
    END IF;
    I converted the above IF statement into DECODE function as mentioned below:
    var_Sev := DECODE(var_int_sev,0,2,SELECT severity FROM errorconfig WHERE errorcode=var_ErrorCode)
    But it throws below error at the select statement used inside DECODE.
    Error(58,51): PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "SELECT" when expecting one of the following: ( - + case mod new not null others <an identifier> <a double-quoted delimited-identifier> <a bind variable> avg count current exists max min prior sql stddev sum variance execute forall merge time timestamp interval date <a string literal with character set specification> <a number> <a single-quoted SQL string> pipe <an alternatively-quoted string literal with character set specification> <an alternativ
    Can someone help me in converting the IF to DECODE in the above case. Also how can we use a select statement inside decode.

    instead of trying to rewrite all your code and hoping that the performance will be better, it's a better option to investigate and find out which part of your application is slow
    read this:
    When your query takes too long ...

Maybe you are looking for