E65 support for 4Gb card?

I now know the current limit is 2Gb, but too late I brought the 4Gb card. I seem to remember reading somewhere that there may be support for 4Gb in the next firmware update, which I am hoping is end of this month. Anyone know anything about this?

21-Aug-200706:42 PM
keenas wrote:
Given that the Nokia N95 uses micro SD-HC cards and further, that the E65 is sold as a business phone perhaps Nokia can be persuaded to release a firmware update which incorporates the use of micro SD-HC cards for it's business users - who often have a real need to store large ammounts of data etc.
and users of music edition phones also need a lot of storage. i would sell my 20gb archos xs202 if a n73 could use at least 8 or 16gb but i dont see that they update s60v3fp0
but maybe there will be a wonder like it was with ad2p
maybe they need some pressure - SDHC FOR EVERYBODY, NOW!!! Message Edited by okidal on 23-Aug-200709:01 PM
V21.0.025 » 04-09-2007 » RM-356 5800 XpressMusic » Language pack 01

Similar Messages

PETITION FOR 4GB CARD SUPPORT!

Hello...
Nokia Users please join this petition for 4GB Card Support for Recent Nokia Phones & Upcoming New Nokia Phones!
Im sure there are owners out there who want the support of 4GB Card. Why is Nokia so Pathetic at listening to our concerns?
Its all simple! the recent models just need firmware teaking (update) so it support 3rd Party Memory Cards! We should benefit this feature from out phones. Theres no such thing as EXTRA hardware required to support 4GB Card ie 4GB Mini-SD, becuase it is the same dimensions n connections & all it needs is Firmware Update!.
However N-Gage, 6280 supports 4GB Card & there were sum screenshots of N80 working with 4GB Card using the old firmware v3.xx.x.xx
Nokia are so pathetic they lock the firmware by not allowing 100% compatible support for 3rd Party cards only Nokia branded Cards!
ALL WE WANT!...
However we (all nokia onwers) should have our phones supporting 4GB Cards. So uwners who agree please post your comment as i will forward this to Nokia Team. Its about time they took action to this!
If you find my post useful then click on
Kudos!Nokia N96 (v20.050 / RM-247)
www.shaysoft.net | Competitions!

hello,
i have an n80 ie, and at the moment i´ve a 2gb mini-sd, formated with >>>>FAT32 working in it.
At this site /discussions/board/message?board.id=smartphones&message.id=38078 , "shayesta", says, if you format your 4gb-mini-sd in your mobile, it will work. THIS IS NOT TRUE (maybe it depends on fw, but excluding the old 3.xxx , i dont believe at this moment in this.
I´ve buyed a 4gb mini-sd (NON-HC!!) ,when i try to format it in my n80ie, it says: "memory-card faulty".
When i use the 4gb-card in my pc or in my qtek9100 (mda vario) it works very well!
It may be paranoid, but i think nokia build a limitation in fw, so that u can´t use more than 2gb mem, because they want that we buy early a new mobile, that sopport 4gb officially. And probably with sup. for "sd-hc" , what on the other hand costs extra money for the "hc"(NON-HC WORX WITH FAT32 TOO, so thats not the difference!)
FACT IS, the n80 CAN work with 4gb, but nokia barricades this function. (I bet every n-series mobile could work since a year with 4gb-card if nokia wouldn´t be so obsinate).
I have not much hope for this great "4gb" fw-upgrade, but i wish the best.
so long, greetz (sry for my bad english, i´m a man from ger, german)
EDIT: removed retail link - MohjoMessage Edited by mohjo on 22-May-2007 04:02 PM

Ext4 format support for microSD cards on Galaxy S5?

Can we get ext4 format support for microSD cards on Galaxy S5? New permissions that come on KitKat break some of my apps that need local storage. The enhanced permissions available with EXT4 should fix this as that is the internal Flash format. "Use the cloud" is a non-starter so don't even suggest it.

Not directly, but as a large customer they have a big say in what gets loaded in the ROM as evidenced by the many (unwanted) preloaded apps. Adding EXT4 file system support to restore Verizon's end customer user experience is something they can insist on. It is a simple requirement to add when the end manufacturer builds a custom ROM for Verizon. The underlying system already supports it and alternative ROMs (CM) have been created with that feature. I'm just not ready to install alternative ROM code on a phone that was just released, and only a week in my possession.

Please tell me Card that support for Java Card 2.2.2

Hi Friends..
Please tell me Card that support for Java Card 2.2.2..
Thanks in advance..

Hi Sebastien_Lorquet..
Firstly, i'm so sorry if i'm mistaken and wrong.. i'm not mean to make you angry.. :(
sorry about this..
Yes, i've searched on google... and i think i'll buy it at NXP..
Thanks in advance Sir.. :)

G4 support for Airport Card alternative?

Hi all,
It never dawned on me that there is an alternative to Apple's Airport cards for our systems until recently. I have a G4 dual 1GHz system which houses a hookup for the original airport card; the system also has PCI slots. I have an Airport Extreme Base station and would like to restrict my frequency range to the 5 GHz ONLY (to avoid the crowding of 2.4 GHz range.) So, is it correct to say that my G4 is not tied down to the original airport card but can theoretically use "n" capable WIFI cards via on board PCI or USB? And if so, any you would recommend? Also, how's the software support for it, i.e., drivers, Airport Utility, etc. since the card would be third party and not Apples? Would I get the support from say, Airport Utility as if I had an Apple airport card in there or are there going to be compatibility issues? Many thanks!

OK, I just found this out:
http://www.beowulf.org/archive/2001-July/004174.html
32 bits/33 Mhz : aggregated ideal peak at 132 MB/s
64 bits/33 Mhz : aggregated ideal peak at 264 MB/s
And that's shared between all items on the PCI bus.
It would be interesting to measure the bandwidth on the USB 2 PCI card. I've seen it vary wildly on a G4/400 Mhz Yikes, sometimes dropping to as little as USB 1.1 even with only one USB item connected on an IOGear card. I no longer have access to that machine. That's of course assuming nothing else is sharing the same bus.

How to: Enable CUDA GPU Support for "Unsupported Cards" in CS6 (same process as in CS5+) :) for MAC

Hi all, I previously was involved in some discussion regarding GPU acceleration with CUDA in Premier Pro CS5 using an 'Unsupported card' with my Macbook Pro... I would like to show you this still works and will be here to show the process for anyone, and will post a video of the whole thing as a step-by-step probably tomorrow (its quite late where i am just now) but I'll give you a quick run through just now... Proof at bottom of page...
Ps. This only applies to Nvidia card Macs.. I have no ATI card mac to try this out as OpenCL etc but i would imagine it would be a similar process...
Step 1... Install Cuda drivers for your Mac (im using 4.2.7) here   http://www.nvidia.com/object/mac-driver-archive.html
Step 2... Install GfxCardStatus and force your graphics (if using a laptop) to discrete card only   http://codykrieger.com/gfxCardStatus
Step 3... Open Terminal... and run GpuSniffer... path as follows for original default installation directory, copy and paste then hit enter or change as required
              /Applications/Adobe\ Premiere\ Pro\ CS6/Adobe\ Premiere\ Pro\ CS6.app/Contents/GPUSniffer.app/Contents/MacOS/GPUSniffer
This should give you an output as follows, while it may differ this is my output...
--- OpenGL Info ---
2012-05-02 01:00:28.642 GPUSniffer[6661:2403] invalid drawable
Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
Renderer: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M OpenGL Engine
OpenGL Version: 2.1 NVIDIA-7.18.11
GLSL Version: 1.20
Monitors: 2
Monitor 0 properties -
   Size: (0, 0, 1920, 1080)
   Max texture size: 8192
   Supports non-power of two: 1
   Shaders 444: 1
   Shaders 422: 1
   Shaders 420: 1
2012-05-02 01:00:28.666 GPUSniffer[6661:2403] invalid drawable
Monitor 1 properties -
   Size: (0, -1200, 1920, 1200)
   Max texture size: 8192
   Supports non-power of two: 1
   Shaders 444: 1
   Shaders 422: 1
   Shaders 420: 1
--- GPU Computation Info ---
Found 2 devices supporting GPU computation.
CUDA Device 0 -
   Name: GeForce GT 330M
   Capability: 1.2
   Driver: 4.02
   Total Video Memory: 511MB
OpenCL Device 1 -
   Name: GeForce GT 330M
   Capability: 1.1
   Driver: 1
   Total Video Memory: 512MB
   Not chosen because it did not match the named list of cards
Step 4... Using the name of your card from the above output, i have it underlined, in my case a GeForce GT 330M, copy this exact name as we will now add it to the list of supported cards...
Step 5... Using terminal still, again assuming default install directories, copy and paste then hit enter on the following...
             sudo nano /Applications/Adobe\ Premiere\ Pro\ CS6/Adobe\ Premiere\ Pro\ CS6.app/Contents/cuda_supported_cards.txt
You will then be asked for your computer password, type it and hit enter, it will not be shown as you type FYI... You will then see the default supported cards, add your card by pasting the name you have as in Step 4, then use ctrl+x to escape, type Y to save and hit enter a couple of times to get out...
You should now be able to run Premier Pro CS6 using the CUDA GPU option you can select in Renderer as you start a new project!!
Any questions i will try to answer them as soon as possible, and as i said i'll screen capture and record a video tutorial as i know that would be of help to some of you out there.. Some proof, here is a pic...
PS. It is a full 1080 pic so it is quite large...
Message was edited by: StuCS5 - Changed Font Size

Very usefull! it worked perfectly on premiere cs6 on my macbook pro 2.8ghz with geforce gt 330m, Any suggestion for enabling ray traced 3d also in after effect? I inserted the geforce gt 330m on the after effect card list, but when i enable ray traced 3d the text in the comp disappear!
thanks!

Support for smart-card authentication in PowerBuilder based application

Hi, I have an application on PB11.5 with an Oracle DB back-end (11.2g). My DoD customer wants the application to use their DoD CAC Card (Smart Card) to authenticate against the Enterprise - Windows Active Directory domain, currently the application uses user-id\password for user authentication. Is this something newer versions of PB can support and implement? Thank you.

You have a couple of choices:
1. Depending on how old their workstations are, or if they have ACTIVCLIENT installed, you could call the CAPICOMM ActiveX using OLE commands
2. A solution that doesn't require that ActiveX is to use the Smart Card SDK built into newer versions of Windows. It does require a lot lower level coding though, as you have to issue specific APDU commands to the card and know how to handle the responses.
I posted a sample of the latter to the NNTP groups back in 2011. I suppose I should get around to creating a blog entry explaining how to use it.

IPhone 5 Support for SD Card

Be aware. The iTunes store says that the Lighning SD Card reader will work with the iPhone 5. It does not! I just purchased one and found out the hard way. Apple was nice enough to issue a refund but that doesn't solve my problem.
Does anybody know why the iPhone 5 does not support the Lighning SD Card Reader? Are there any options to read an SD card on the iPhone that does work?

No, they don't. It is compatible with the iPad 4 and iPad Mini. They do not state anywhere that it is compatible with the iPhone 5.

Support for nvidia card ?

Bootcamp does not load drivers for my Nvidia GeForce GT650M card into Windows7 64bit. What to do?

Down and install these. They are straight from NVIDIA.
http://us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/306.97/306.97-notebook-win8-win7-winvista- 64bit-international-whql.exe

Support for AVM ISDN PCMCIA Card in Solaris 10 ?

Hi all,
I would like to install Solaris 10 on my Toshiba Tecra S1 notebook. Today I use an ISDN-Card (AVM FritzCard, PCMCIA) for dial-up connections under Windows XP. Are there any drivers for ISDN and/or PCMCIA-Cards in Solaris10? Does anyone have any experiences with this issue?
Every hint would be appreciated.
Thanks a lot.
Kindly Regard,
Holger

Hello.
There only very poor support for ISDN cards in Solaris. As far as I know only the on-board ISDN card of one of the SparcStation computers is supported (this card is available as S-Bus card for other SparcStation computers).
I think there is no support for any ISDN card that can be attached to an x86 computer.
I wrote a driver for USB based ISDN modems that are based on the Winbond 6694 chip myself due to this lack of ISDN support. I tested it under Solaris 9/Sparc.
Martin

10.10.3 breaks support for ATI video cards

The 10.10.3 update has broken support for a bunch of ATI video cards that worked just fine under 10.10.2. This is for my Mac Pro 5,1. Some folks also reported issues with breaking support for Nvidia cards, but have mentioned that the latest Nvidia beta drivers might work.
There is a thread that may be found here that has some details:
OS X 10.10.3 Update
and here (reverting back to 10.10.2 fixes things):
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1864352
Specifically, my Visiontek Eyefinity 6 7750 stopped working, and another users Radeon 7770 stopped working. Yet, the 7970 continues to work. Reverting to the old ATI 5770 that came with the machine renders it usable. This is a problem as the 7750 only took a single slot, and the two 5770s eat up 3 slots so I can't use my USB 3 card, etc.
I remember this once happened before. I think it was with the 10.9.2 update which borked a bunch of video cards that worked fine under 10.9.1, and then were again made to work just fine with the 10.9.3 update.
All the 'standard' fixes have been attempted. Clean installs. Fix permissions. Etc.
Not sure why apple would seemingly disable support for these cards, other than by accident, I assume, much like happened with the 10.9.2 update.
Also not sure if just copying the correct driver from 10.10.2 might solve the problem until Apple get's around to fixing the issue. Has anyone tried? Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks!

Hi, i am using dual Cinema Display 30 and 23 with a HIS ATI 7750 1 GB on a Mac Pro 3.1. Post upgrade from 10.10.2 to 10.10.3 my display eded unusable blurry. Therefore I have tried to replace the 10.10.3 kext with the previous 10.10.2. But it did not work out as expected. I managed to get some video output but no acceleration at all. Therefore the system is unusable. Therefore i full downgraded to 10.10.2 now.
Never the less it might be a good starting point for someone to get acceleration running. This is what I did:
I have to set the nvram variable kext-dev-mode=1, but be warned this will allow any unsigned > .kext to load, including rootlets, malware, etc.
I did this in order to allow me to modify the kext if necessary and to ensure that if 10.10.2 kext might be locked that they still be loaded and the computer will not be prevented from boot.
sudo nvram boot-args="kext-dev-mode=1"
sudo shutdown -r now
Post this i copied from my other Mac running 10.10.2 the file /System/Library/Extensions/AMDRadeonX4000.kext to my Mac Pro 3.1 running 10.10.3 with no proper video output. Basically i copied all ATI related kext from one mac to the other.
copied [MAC10.10.2]/System/Library/Extensions/ATI* ----> [MAC10.10.3]/System/Library/Extensions/ATI*
copied [MAC10.10.2]/System/Library/Extensions/AMD* ----> [MAC10.10.3]/System/Library/Extensions/AMD*
someone needs to do a diff here to identify the file with is necessary the only one i found with a significant change seems to be AMDRadeonX4000.kext
I forced to rebuild kext cache manually
sudo touch /System/Library/Extensions
sudo kextcache -m /System/Library/Caches/com.apple.kext.caches/Startup/Extensions.mkext /System/Library/Extensions
And reboot!
sudo shutdown -r now
After the reboot I had display output but no acceleration at all. Seeing the video out put made me happy but the system is unusable to to the lack of acceleration of the display. I am really looking forward for Apple to fix the update and to reapply support for the ATI GPUs hence it allows to save environmental resources to keep good products like the Mac Pro 3.1 running...

What video cards are supported for os X?

What video cards are supported for os X? besides the one apple sells.

There is no official list from Apple, since they don't support hardware besides what they will install. YOu can look up support for certain cards, since people have used 3rd party ones. YOu should be able to come up with a particular cards compatability.

Does Tecra M2 supports SD HC 4GB cards?

Does anyone know if the SD slot on the tecra m2 will support SDHC 4Gb cards??
Cheers. Dave

Hello Sunset
Unfortunately I dont have SDHC card but I can confirm that Tecra M2 can read usual 4GB SD card. I have tested it with Transcend 150x SD card.
If you will find out something about compatibility with SDHC card please let me know.

The 4GB card is here!!!!

weve all been hearing about the 4GB cards coming soon....they are here and ready to ship....
alot of you may ask so how does that help as as many/most phones do not support 4gb cards...
we the rumour mill has stated that although no nokia phones currently support the 4gb cards that support for such is just a firmware update away from supporting these cards....thus when the 4gb cards hit the market a fw update should bring most phones up to date....good news aint it?

14-Feb-2007
07:17 AM
korngear wrote:
To nj_7
So what do y mean bro?
I mean these 4 GBs are on HCSD format and is not clear whether the old phones like n91 or n80 won't support it after even FW upgrade?
Yes! Is technical possible to do a firmware upgrade of existing phones, like N73 or N80 to support SDHC cards. But like I said on previous post, the change of phones is so quick, that is most probable that these ones rest to support only 2Gb SD cards, and only new phones, go to support SDHC cards. The problem is that new announces, like E90, N77 don´t have also support for SDHC cards, which means only, maybe, on 2008 we go have phones with that support.

PRE9 No longer supports older nvidia card GPU's (?)

I've started this new discussion rather than continuing GPU Effects in PRE7 but not in PRE9 as this focuses more on the cards rather than the effects. In this discussion I hope that users with nvidia cards could report what their card is, and whether or not GPU Effects/Transitions show.
My nvidia 8800GT performs exceptionally well with PRE7.
Scrubbing along the timeline, or changing timeline scaling results in almost instantaneous redrawing of thumbnails.
All GPU effects and transitions are available and work well.
But with PRE9:
Scrubbing along the timeline, or changing timeline scaling, results in an agonisingly slow redrawing of thumbnails.
GPU effects and transitions are not available.
It seems to me that PRE9 is either no longer supporting older cards, or is identifying cards incorrectly. My gut feel is the first - that PRE9 is only working with *specific* video cards.
I think this because:
Adobe PRE9 Help shows:
About GPU effects
If your computer has an AGP‑ or a PCI‑based
video card, it probably has a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit). If
your GPU supports DirectX 9.x, Pixel Shader (PS) 1.3 or later, and
Vertex Shader (VS) 1.1 or later, you can use GPU‑accelerated effects. These
effects take advantage of the added video processing capabilities
of GPU cards, adding three‑dimensional realism to images.
You can find these effects in the GPU Effects menu in the Effects
view only if your computer has a supported GPU. (Some effect options
are available only if your graphics card supports Pixel Shader 2.0
or later and Vertex Shader 2.0 or later.) For details, see the system
requirements on the Adobe Premiere Elements product page
on the Adobe website.
I could not find graphics cards listed in Adobe Premiere Elements 9: System requirements. But I did find this on the Premiere Pro CS5 System Requirements:
Supported NVIDIA graphics cards for GPU acceleration
GeForce GTX 285 (Windows and Mac OS)
GeForce GTX 470 (Windows)
Quadro 4000 (Windows)
Quadro 5000 (Windows)
Quadro FX 3800 (Windows)
Quadro FX 4800 (Windows and Mac OS)
Quadro FX 5800 (Windows)
Quadro CX
It does make me wonder if PRE9 follows this restricted list of cards.
Another clue(?) is that the Adobe Knowledge Base 51526, Troubleshoot digital video playback, shows:
3. Switch the GPU playback option.
Note: This option is not present in Adobe Premiere Elements 9.0.
Adobe Premiere Elements is designed to take advantage of display
cards with accelerated GPUs. If you are having playback issues, make
sure you use the correct GPU playback mode that corresponds with your
display card.
Enable GPU Playback: The setting if you have a GPU-accelerated display card.
Disable GPU Playback:The setting offers the lowest performance but
is appropriate for display cards that do not fully support Direct 3D
So the feature to manually describe your card to PRE9 *HAS* been deliberately removed, by inference leaving it totally to the application to decide whether or not your card is supported.
I'll be posting this information at the Adobe Bug/Feature report.
Cheers,
Neale
Insanity is hereditary, you get it from your children

No, and it doesn't support some new cards in particular configurations either.
The main ones affected are the laptop hybrids in Sony Vaio. I have a Sony Vaio Z11, and the Z12 and Z13 are affected by exactly the same problem.
The nVidia video card is GT330M, which should support all sorts of things. But the most recent driver that works in this hybrid configuration (the way it is set up by Sony) is 190.xx, which presumably doesn't support this.
So PRE9 loads with an error message, but I can't see anything in the video preview, which makes editing a little difficult. It works fine in Sony Vegas though.
Sony Vaio with the auto-switching hybrid configurations are fairly common (they've sold well), and the Z11, Z12 and Z13 are a current and very powerful model (mine is Core-i7, 8GB RAM, SSD). It is a laptop that looks good, so appeals to graphic artists and video editors.
Adobe possibly needs to fix this rather quickly, because there are complaints all over the forums and I can see a lot of people dropping Adobe Premiere Elements in favour of the Sony Vegas product simply because they can't make it work. All it takes is the ability to switch OFF GPU processing! Alternatively support for this card.
Hugo

E65 support for 4Gb card?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for