E71 Call divert times

I have an E71, my call diverts are active, but the problem is that the phone rings for 10 seconds, then goes to the divert for messagebank. I want to increase the time the phone rings before diverting. How is this done?
MightyTriby

Try..........
tools
settings
phone
call divert
voice calls
If not answered
activate
gives you the option upto 30 seconds
Hope this helps

Similar Messages

  • Call Divert

    I am disappointed in the Call Divert service.
    I have it set up to divert to my mobile if the phone is not answered or busy.
    It takes a long time for the call to be put through and in the meantime there is an annoying message which is repeated three times. It does not sound at all professional.
    I used to be with Virgin and their divert system was much slicker.
    I would like to get rid of the annoying message - any chance?
    Why does it take longer than Virgin?
    PS the Infinity Broadband is a lot quicker which is why we changed.

    the delay depends on the setting this link may help http://btbusiness.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/7684/~/how-do-i-divert-calls-from-my-phone%3F
    If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

  • 6300 call divert missing from menu

    Some time ago I set up Call Divert on my Nokia 6300 (on Orange UK), but now that I wish to cancel it, I go to menu>setiings>call, but Call Divert no longer appears. The items there are listed as 2/8 to 8/8. How do I get it back?

    This could v well b an operator issue. In India a network BSNL allows call diverts to only its own network numbers. So if that's the case in ur area pls do check with the operator too.
    Please mark the post as solution if it solves your problem.
    Current Device - Nokia Lumia 1020/920

  • 5800 Call Divert

    Hi
    I am having problems with the call divert on my 5800.  I have set it up to divert to my voicemail if I don't answer, however it only rings twice and then diverts.  I'm trying to find out how to extend the time it rings before diverting as I haven't answered a call sucessfully yet since I've had the phone!
    Thanks all!

    try checking under Menu > Settings > Calling > Call Divert > Voice Calls > If not answered
    max u should be able to set the timer to is 30 secs
    if there are any errors and if it still diverts before the timer set, u should call ur network provider
    if my post helped u out, please click the Star next to it to add some KUDOS to my name

  • Cancelling call divert

    Each time I try to cancel call divert by dialling #21# I get a message saying 'sorry, the service requested is not available' !!!  Any ideas what I do now as I am desperate to cancel call divert.  Thanks for any help

    that is the correct way to take a divert off... if you put on the divert this should work, however if it was put on by 151 you may have to give them a call... also if you are using a feature line have you tried # 121 #

  • 6310 : Call Divert - 'Request not Completed'

    I have a Nokia 6310 and wish to set up a call divert.
    I follow the instructions in the manual, setting the delay, etc, but when I get to select Activate I am given a error message of 'Request not Completed'.
    What is causing this?

    If you're on a Pay & Go sim, some networks only allow you to divert to Voicemail - and it won't allow diverts to other mobiles/landlines.
    Nokia History: 3110, 5110, 7110, 7110, 3510i, 6210, 6310i, 5210, 6100, 6610, 7250, 7250i, 6650, 6230, 6230i, 6260, N70, N70, 5300, N95, N95, E71, E72
    Android History: HTC Desire, SE Xperia Arc, HTC Sensation, Sensation XE, One X+, Google Nexus 5

  • Noisy line,Call Divert activated without request.E...

    For some months I experienced severe crackling on line but BT advised "No fault on line".I thought my handset might be faulty so have used other (new)handsets,without success. Tried online diagnostic tests to no avail.I do have a phone/broadband "splitter" but phone faults are the same whether or not phone is connected to main socket via splitter.
    In the last week,I have been unable to make or receive calls--line is dead(no dialling tone or ring-tone) and incoming callers receive the automated BT 1571 answerphone message. My investigations suggest that "call divert" option has been selected but *I* have had no reason to do this and ,in any event, I understand that a
    PIN number is required to activate/deactivate this facility.So---who has activated the "divert"? Not me
    In desperation,and fully aware of the risk of call-out charge,I have arranged an engineer's appointment on two separate occasions.On neither day did the engineer turn up within the agreed time-scale but on each occasion BT have then sent me an automated e-mail message saying that the engineer turned up at the agreed time but could not gain access.This is preposterous(!) as on both days I or my wife "kept watch"  at our front window continuously for the 5 hour slot. We were grossly inconvenienced on both occasions.
    I am now about to start a complaints procedure via BT, Ofcom,Watchdog etc but, before I do, I would welcome any advice from forum members and, hopefully,anyone at BT who is caring enough to suggest a prompt solution
    before I have to cancel my account with them
    Geoff,
    Bolton
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I am currently experiencing very similar problems to GeordieGeoff.
    For weeks we have had a very noisy line and rung BT only to be advised by the BT automated service that there is no fault on the line and to be warned that I would be charged £127 if I insisted on a visit and it was my equipment to blame. 
    We blamed our digital cordless phone  and hunted for the receipt as it was less than a year old havng bought a new phone we plugged it in to find the same problem I attempted to contact BT via their e-mail contact however every time I tried to send the e-mail asking for assistance the e-mail would not send and kept saying I had entered an invalid e-mail address. 
    Being unable to get e-mail support on Mon 9th August I rang BT and took the risk and booked an engineer for the following day between 8-1pm. I then received a mobile phone message which said they had found a fault but it was outside the property and therefore they would not need to enter. On the afternoon of the day the engineer had been booked he turned up saying he had just been sent ut to check my line he knew nothing about me having been told there was no need to be in and said he definatly needed to check the line in the house. (good thing we were in eh)
    Having checked the line he said there was a fault under the pavement and contractors would have to dig up the pavement before the line could be repaired but he had no idea of timescale. I rang BT as I currently have no phone and very intermittent broadband and asked them to divert my house calls to my mobile they agreed to do this and call me after 6pm to advise on timescale of repair. You guessed it no phone call!!
    Yesterday morning I spotted a BT engineer in our road so went and asked him about the repair he said he was a tracking engineer and was only there to identify where needed digging up. He said I should be notified by BT of timescale and I told him I had little faith as they had not rung me the day before when they promised. However later I received a text which said "we need longer to repair your line" well I'm sorry but I could have told them that !
    To date (friday ) we have not had the pavement dug up and therefore have no phone and very limited broadband I have also just been told by my daughter that my phone is not diverting to my mobile I have also received several very irritating text messages telling me it will tke longer to repair my phone !!
    any thoughts ?
    yours fed up Teresa   

  • Incoming Calls divert if Bluetooth-Suite connectio...

    If my Nokia 6233 (firmware 5.6, homed to 3g network, silent vibrate-only profile) is connected to PC Suite 6.85.14.1, incoming calls divert. I believe this started happening after I updated my firmware to 5.6. Could someone confirm this problem or do I need to send my phone for repair?

    I have asked a moderator to provide assistance, they will post an invite on this thread.
    They are the only BT employees on this forum, and are a UK based team of people, who take personal ownership of your problem.
    Once you get a reply, if you click on their name, you will see a screen like this. Click on the link as shown below.
    Please do not send them a personal message, as they may not be on duty for a long time, and your message will not be tracked properly.
    For your own security, do not post any personal details, on this forum. That includes any tracking number you are give.
    They will respond either by phone or e-mail within 5-6 working days.
    Please use the tracked e-mail, to reply, not via the forum. Thanks
    This is the form you should see when you click on the link. If you do not see this form, then you have selected the wrong link.
    When you submit the form, you will receive an enquiry number, so please keep a note of it
    There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
    BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

  • Cancelling call diverts on Nokia 6630.

    At present my phone only rings for about 15 seconds before going to my voicemail. I have tried to cancel the divert but my phone will not allow me to cancel when not answered nor will it allow me to increase the time before diverting.
    Is there any other way around this or should i contact my network?
    Cheers

    A few useful codes :
    Call Divert (all call types)
    All
    Set: **21*destination#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##21#[SEND]
    Query: *#21#[SEND]
    No Answer
    Delay nn seconds: max is generally 30 seconds
    Set: **61*destination*nn#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##61#[SEND]
    Query: *#61#[SEND]
    Unreachable
    Set: **62*destination#[SEND]
    Cancel: #62#[SEND]
    Query: *#62#[SEND]
    Busy
    Set: **67*destination#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##67#[SEND]
    Query: *#67#[SEND]
    Cancel All
    ##002#[SEND]
    Divert Voice Calls
    All
    Set: **21*destination*11#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##21*11#[SEND]
    Query: *#21*11#[SEND]
    No Answer
    Delay nn seconds: max is generally 30 seconds
    Set: **61*destination*11*nn#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##61*11#[SEND]
    Query: *#61*11#[SEND]
    Unreachable
    Set: **62*destination*11#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##62*11#[SEND]
    Query: *#62*11#[SEND]
    Busy
    Set: **67*destination*11#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##67*11#[SEND]
    Query: *#67*11#[SEND]
    Divert Data Calls
    All
    Set: **21*destination*25#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##21*25 [SEND]
    Query: *#21*25#[SEND]
    No Answer
    Delay nn seconds: max is generally 30 seconds
    Set: **61*destination*25*nn#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##61*25#[SEND]
    Query: *#61*25#[SEND]
    Unreachable
    Set: **62*destination*25#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##62*25#[SEND]
    Query: *#62*25#[SEND]
    Busy
    Set: **67*destination*25#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##67*25#[SEND]
    Query: *#67*25#[SEND]
    Divert Fax Calls
    All
    Set: **21*destination*13#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##21*13#[SEND]
    Query: *#21*13#[SEND]
    No Answer
    Delay nn seconds: max is generally 30 seconds
    Set: **61*destination*13*nn#[SEND]
    Cancel: #61*13#[SEND]
    Query: *#61*13#[SEND]
    Unreachable
    Set: **62*destination*13#[SEND]
    Cancel: #62*13#[SEND]
    Query: *#62*13#[SEND]
    Busy
    Set: **67*destination*13#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##67*13#[SEND]
    Query: *#67*13#[SEND]
    Divert Line 2 Calls
    All
    Set: **21*destination*89#[SEND]
    Cancel: #21*89#[SEND]
    Query: *#21*89#[SEND]
    No Answer
    Delay nn seconds: max is generally 30 seconds
    Set: **61*destination*89*nn#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##61*89#[SEND]
    Query: *#61*89#[SEND]
    Unreachable
    Set: **62*destination*89#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##62*89#[SEND]
    Query: *#62*89#[SEND]
    Busy
    Set: **67*destination*89#[SEND]
    Cancel: ##67*89#[SEND]
    Query: *#67*89#[SEND]

  • When I swipe phone to open, and hit the phone icon, then make a call, most times it says "calling mobile" but then nothing happens.

    Same thing here.  I'm getting very frustrated.  When I swipe phone to open, and hit the phone icon, then make a call, most times it says "calling mobile" but then nothing happens.  Then I try to end the call and hit the END button.  Sure, it looks like the call disconnected, but as soon as I try to make another call, I see the same screen (the first called) and the words "calling mobile".  The only way I can rememdy this, naturally, is powering off and restarting.  But, c'mon...$300 for a phone that you have to power down between calls???
    I've got the latest OS update, no jailbreak, or anything exotic on my 4s.  What's more, when I try to make a call 2 out of 3 times, the dumb SIRI opens up and stops me from making the call.  (and, yes, I have very carefully checked my process that I am not intentionally activating SIRI with my cheek.)
    Again, $300 for all this in just trying to make a call?

    reset your phonr by pressing the home and sleep buttons until you see the Apple logo, ignoring the slider. Takes about 5-15 secs of button holding and you won't lose any data or settings.

  • HOW TO DELETE PHONE NO. RECORD IN CALL DIVERT

    Hi! Please help me, I have recently activated a call divert if the phone is not answered. My problem is, when I deactivate this function. The record of the phone number that I have used is still appearing, how do I delete this record?

    Menu > Tools > Settings > Phone > Call divert > Voice calls > If not answered > Activate > To voice mailbox.
    Most networks don't allow you to deactivate altogether the call divert is no answer, so setting it to divert to your voice mailbox just puts things back to their defaults.
    Was this post helpful? If so, please click on the white "Kudos!" star below. Thank you!

  • Finalize() method being called multiple times for same object?

    I got a dilly of a pickle here.
    Looks like according to the Tomcat output log file that the finalize method of class User is being called MANY more times than is being constructed.
    Here is the User class:
    package com.db.multi;
    import java.io.*;
    import com.db.ui.*;
    import java.util.*;
    * @author DBriscoe
    public class User implements Serializable {
        private String userName = null;
        private int score = 0;
        private SocketImage img = null;
        private boolean gflag = false;
        private Calendar timeStamp = Calendar.getInstance();
        private static int counter = 0;
        /** Creates a new instance of User */
        public User() { counter++;     
        public User(String userName) {
            this.userName = userName;
            counter++;
        public void setGflag(boolean gflag) {
            this.gflag = gflag;
        public boolean getGflag() {
            return gflag;
        public void setScore(int score) {
            this.score = score;
        public int getScore() {
            return score;
        public void setUserName(String userName) {
            this.userName = userName;
        public String getUserName() {
            return userName;
        public void setImage(SocketImage img) {
            this.img = img;
        public SocketImage getImage() {
            return img;
        public void setTimeStamp(Calendar c) {
            this.timeStamp = c;
        public Calendar getTimeStamp() {
            return this.timeStamp;
        public boolean equals(Object obj) {
            try {
                if (obj instanceof User) {
                    User comp = (User)obj;
                    return comp.getUserName().equals(userName);
                } else {
                    return false;
            } catch (NullPointerException npe) {
                return false;
        public void finalize() {
            if (userName != null && !userName.startsWith("OUTOFDATE"))
                System.out.println("User " + userName + " destroyed. " + counter);
        }As you can see...
    Every time a User object is created, a static counter variable is incremented and then when an object is destroyed it appends the current value of that static member to the Tomcat log file (via System.out.println being executed on server side).
    Below is the log file from an example run in my webapp.
    Dustin
    User Queue Empty, Adding User: com.db.multi.User@1a5af9f
    User Dustin destroyed. 0
    User Dustin destroyed. 0
    User Dustin destroyed. 0
    User Dustin destroyed. 0
    User Dustin destroyed. 0
    USER QUEUE: false
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    AFTER METHOD: false
    User Dustin destroyed. 1
    User Dustin destroyed. 1
    User Dustin destroyed. 1
    User Dustin destroyed. 1
    USER QUEUE: false
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    AFTER METHOD: false
    User Dustin destroyed. 2
    User Dustin destroyed. 2
    User Dustin destroyed. 2
    User Dustin destroyed. 2
    User Dustin destroyed. 2
    User Dustin destroyed. 2
    User Dustin destroyed. 2
    User Dustin destroyed. 2
    USER QUEUE: false
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    AFTER METHOD: false
    User Dustin destroyed. 3
    User Dustin destroyed. 3
    User Dustin destroyed. 3
    User Dustin destroyed. 3
    User Dustin destroyed. 3
    User Dustin destroyed. 3
    User Dustin destroyed. 3
    User Dustin destroyed. 3
    User Dustin destroyed. 3
    USER QUEUE: false
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    AFTER METHOD: false
    User Dustin destroyed. 4
    User Dustin destroyed. 4
    User Dustin destroyed. 4
    User Dustin destroyed. 4
    User Dustin destroyed. 4
    User Dustin destroyed. 4
    User Dustin destroyed. 4
    User Dustin destroyed. 4
    User Dustin destroyed. 4
    USER QUEUE: false
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    AFTER METHOD: false
    User Dustin destroyed. 5
    User Dustin destroyed. 5
    User Dustin destroyed. 5
    User Dustin destroyed. 5
    User Dustin destroyed. 5
    User Dustin destroyed. 5
    User Dustin destroyed. 5
    User Dustin destroyed. 5
    User Dustin destroyed. 5
    USER QUEUE: false
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    AFTER METHOD: false
    User Dustin destroyed. 6
    User Dustin destroyed. 6
    User Dustin destroyed. 6
    User Dustin destroyed. 6
    User Dustin destroyed. 6
    User Dustin destroyed. 6
    User Dustin destroyed. 6
    User Dustin destroyed. 6
    User Dustin destroyed. 6
    User Dustin destroyed. 6
    Joe
    USER QUEUE: false
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    AFTER METHOD: false
    User Dustin pulled from Queue, Game created: Joe
    User Already Placed: Dustin with Joe
    User Dustin destroyed. 7
    User Dustin destroyed. 7
    User Dustin destroyed. 7
    User Dustin destroyed. 7
    User Dustin destroyed. 7
    User Dustin destroyed. 7
    User Dustin destroyed. 7
    User Dustin destroyed. 7
    User Dustin destroyed. 7
    User Dustin destroyed. 7
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    USER QUEUE: true
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    User Dustin destroyed. 9
    User Joe destroyed. 9
    User Dustin destroyed. 9
    User Dustin destroyed. 9
    User Dustin destroyed. 9
    User Dustin destroyed. 9
    INSIDE METHOD: true
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    USER QUEUE: true
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    INSIDE METHOD: true
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    USER QUEUE: true
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    INSIDE METHOD: false
    It really does seem to me like finalize is being called multiple times for the same object.
    That number should incremement for every instantiated User, and finalize can only be called once for each User object.
    I thought this was impossible?
    Any help is appreciated!

    Thanks...
    I am already thinking of ideas to limit the number of threads.
    Unfortunately there are two threads of execution in the servlet handler, one handles requests and the other parses the collection of User objects to check for out of date timestamps, and then eliminates them if they are out of date.
    The collection parsing thread is currently a javax.swing.Timer thread (Bad design I know...) so I believe that I can routinely check for timestamps in another way and fix that problem.
    Just found out too that Tomcat was throwing me a ConcurrentModificationException as well, which may help explain the slew of mysterious behavior from my servlet!
    The Timer thread has to go. I got to think of a better way to routinely weed out User objects from the collection.
    Or perhaps, maybe I can attempt to make it thread safe???
    Eg. make my User collection volatile?
    Any opinions on the best approach are well appreciated.

  • JTextField.focusLost is called multiple times. Why?

    I have a JTextField component called projectNum.
    On focusLost I'm trying to prevent user to leave an empty field.
    But I have a problem, because focusLost is called two times.
    Here is a code snippet:
    projectNum.addFocusListener(new FocusAdapter() {
                   public void focusGained(FocusEvent e) {}
                   public void focusLost(java.awt.event.FocusEvent e) {
                        if(!e.isTemporary()){ //only for permanent lost of focus          
                             if (validProjectNum()){
    newProject.setProjectNum(Integer.valueOf(projectNum.getText().trim()).intValue());
                           }else{
                                if(!projectNum.hasFocus()){
                                     projectNum.requestFocus();
              });Method "validProjectNum()" simply checks if JTextField is empty and
    if so, shows JOptionPane message and returns false.
    Problem is that I'm geting that message twice
    (four times if I exclude: if(!e.isTemporary()) ).
    I can't figure out who is calling focusLost the second time.
    How can I prevent it to be called only once.
    I appreciate any help or hint.
    Thanks.

    OK, but where to show a message to a user?if the textfield is empty, this line executes
    if(tf.getText().equals("")) return false;
    perhaps you could add your message as part of the
    'block' of this if statementWell, I've tried that allready (see my second post, method validProjectNum()
    does exactly that).
    Anyway, I solved the problem using focusLost and a little trick:jTextField.requestFocus();                
           jTextField.setFocusable(false);          
           JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, "error message");
           jTextField.setFocusable(true);  
           jTextField.requestFocus();        So as you can see, key thing is to temporary disable focus on component
    and than enable it back after JOptionPane.showMessageDialog().
    It looks like JOptionPane.showMessageDialog()
    triggers focusLost() event.
    Thanks everyone.

  • Generic Data Source is calling multiple times in RSA3

    [color:red}<Moderator Message: This topic has alread been discussed a lot of times. Additionally there are weblogs related to it. Please search the forums and/or the blogs for this issue>
    Hi experts,
    I have the requirement to get data from Generic Data Sources with function Module,
    after finishing the FM I have checked in extact checker(RSA)
    in the internal table I_T_DATA is displays 281 records,
    but in RSA3 it shows 112560 records, I found that the FM is calling multiple time by executing one time in RSA3.
    1.what would be the problem
    2.where is the porblem is it in FM coding or any other places to check.
    <removed by moderator>
    Regards
    Vijay
    Edited by: Siegfried Szameitat on Feb 3, 2009 11:45 AM

    Hi Savita,
    I don't understand clearly from your reply regarding flow you transported and what all you transported.
    You need to first transport objects in R/3 and import them.
    Then transport Infoprovider, Datasource in BI assuming depenedent Infoare Infoobject, application component already transported.
    Then transport your Infosource, Update rule, Transfer rules, Infopackage.
    Hope you understood.
    Ravi

  • Method called three times on page loading

    I have a page with panelTabbed and several showDetailItems. On the first showDetailItem I have ADF Query component with the results table.
    I want the second showDetailItem to be enabled or disabled depending on whether there is a selected row in the results table or not.
    I have second showDetailItem's Disabled property set to an EL expression referring to a method in a backing bean.
    This method is called three times during initial page loading. I suspected that it was caused by some partialTriggers, but without any partialTriggers
    ADF behave the same way.
    Moreover, first two times there is a selected row in an iterator. Only the third time there's no selected row (empty initial state of the results table).
    And if this method returns false (not disabled) first two times and true (disabled) third time only, the second showDetailItem is enabled after page is loaded.
    What is responsible for these redundant calls of the method?

    Studio Edition Version 11.1.2.0.0
    Build JDEVADF_11.1.2.0.0_GENERIC_110531.1615.6017

Maybe you are looking for