EAM Implementation
Hi ,
I have SAP ERP 5.0 server on MS SQL 200 with Windows operating System. Now i want to Implement EAM on same server.
please guide what i need to do ? Is it require to upgrade it in ERP 6 or any EHP available on market place for ERP 5 which make my server on desired label. below is the server SP details.
SAP_BASIS 640 0021 SAPKB64021 SAP Basis Component
SAP_ABA 640 0021 SAPKA64021 Cross-Application Component
ST-PI 2005_1_640 0008 SAPKITLQH8 SAP Solution Tools Plug-In
PI_BASIS 2005_1_640 0013 SAPKIPYJ6D Basis Plug-In (PI_BASIS) 2005_1_640
SAP_BW 350 0021 SAPKW35021 SAP_BW 350
SAP_APPL 500 0018 SAPKH50018 Logistics and Accounting
SAP_HR 500 0019 SAPKE50019 Human Resources
PI 2004_1_500 0017 SAPKIPZI6H PI 2003_1_470 : Add-On Delta Upgrade
EA-IPPE 300 0010 SAPKGPIC10 EA-IPPE 300: Add-On Installation
EA-APPL 500 0012 SAPKGPAC12 SAP R/3 Enterprise PLM, SCM, Financials
EA-DFPS 500 0012 SAPKGPDC12 SAP R/3 ENTERPRISE DFPS
EA-FINSERV 500 0012 SAPKGPFC12 SAP R/3 Enterprise Financial Services
EA-GLTRADE 500 0012 SAPKGPGC12 SAP R/3 Enterprise Global Trade
EA-HR 500 0019 SAPKGPHC19 SAP R/3 Enterprise HR Extension
EA-PS 500 0012 SAPKGPPC12 SAP R/3 Enterprise Public Services
EA-RETAIL 500 0012 SAPKGPRC12 SAP R/3 Enterprise Retail
BI_CONT 353 0001 SAPKIBIFP1 Business Intelligence Content
ST-A/PI 01K_ECC500 0000 - Application Servicetools for ECC 500
VIRSANH 510_640 0000 - RTA 5.1 Installation package for HR and
Regards
Gyan
To be honest with you, I'd suggest you post this topic on the databases and OS forums.
Most of the people on here are functional experts
Similar Messages
-
GRC 10 Role based firefighter multiple users
Hi All
We are using GRC AC 10 SP12 and have Role based EAM implemented. We are looking at way to prevent the same user from being assigned multiple firefighters or a way for approver to know that another Firefighter ID is already assigned to this user?
Thanks in advance
Regards
VijayaHi Vijaya,
You can train approvers to Click on existing assignment button(in Access Request) to know the roles already assigned.
And if in your environment, FF roles has distinguished naming convention then it can easily be identified
by role owners.
Thanks,
mamoon -
Tab - 'Activities' in Create Notification missing in NWBC for HTML.
Dear Members,
Greetings for the day!
I am working with NWBC for HTML as a part of EAM implementation in my project.
When I am trying to create a notification in SAP GUI via the transaction - IW21, I am able to see a tab namely - "Activities".
But this same tab is not available when I am trying to create a notification using NWBC for HTML in the same SAP system.
Please refer the enclosed screen document in which I have highlighted the issue.
Could anyone please suggest me if any business function needs to be activated for making this tab available in NWBC HTML also?
Else do I need to raise an OSS message to SAP for any note implementations or is there a need to develop / configure this tab in Webdynpro ABAP / Floor Plan Manager framework?
I humbly request your response.
Warm regards,
Ram Nyayapati.
[email protected]Thanks for your reply!
I'm create a theme in the UI Theme Designer.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Where I can see, what my theme is created well? -
Predictive Analytics for Equipment Maintenance?
Could an equipment failure or parts shortage be predicted based on an analysis of work orders, parts and equipment usage? Predictive Analytics uses several techniques from data mining and statistics to process data in order to predict future trends and behavior patterns. A key characteristic of the analysis is to provide insight into equipment failure and parts usage that may not be readily apparent through simple reporting. Predictive analytics is an option of Oracle's Relational Database (9.1, 9.2, 10.1, 10.2, and 11.1). If you have been using Oracle eAM for over one year and would like to participate in a proof of concept (working closely with the Product Strategy team) to determine the potential benefits of predictive analytics please contact me. You can explore data mining and predictive analytics at www.oracle.com/technology/products/bi/odm/index.html.
Hi,
We are in our 2nd year of eAM Implementation and I'm very keen to explore the full functionality of this module.
Yes, I would like to participate in a proof of concept (working closely with the Product Strategy team) to determine the potential benefits of predictive analytics Please initiate contact.
Thanks & Regards,
Rubeel (Saad)
CMMS/Oracle eAM Administrator
QAFAC
Direct: +974 4773423
Cell: +974 5546289
[email protected] -
Difference - Predictive Work Bench & Predictive Analysis
Hi all,
Pls help by providing information difference between Predictive Work Bench & Predictive AnalysisHi,
We are in our 2nd year of eAM Implementation and I'm very keen to explore the full functionality of this module.
Yes, I would like to participate in a proof of concept (working closely with the Product Strategy team) to determine the potential benefits of predictive analytics Please initiate contact.
Thanks & Regards,
Rubeel (Saad)
CMMS/Oracle eAM Administrator
QAFAC
Direct: +974 4773423
Cell: +974 5546289
[email protected] -
Project Plan for EAM analytics implementation.
Hi Experts,
My Boss has asked me to provide him the project plan for this EAM analytics implementation, showing how long will it take for the dashboards to be up with the correct data.
Reason why he is asking this is because initial configuration has been done in BI Apps but prima facie looks like the DATA on dashboards is not correct.
Now he is worried as to how long will it take... and even i am not sure on this as I am new to this..( i m the only one configuring EAM Dashboards - ie only one resource )
Any experiences or helpful advise for this kind of scenario that i can tell my boss or what should be my action plan.
Thanks
AshishAny pointers?
-
EAM Asset Number Open Interface - Technical Reference docs required
Hello,
I'm developing a migration of EAM assets.
I have no issue by filling the interface tables MTL_EAM_ASSET_NUM_INTERFACE and MTL_EAM_ATTR_VAL_INTERFACE and then running the "Import Asset Number" standard functionallity.
But, I need to work with genealogy information. The table MTL_OBJECT_GENEALOGY_INTERFACE is used to relate parent and child assets .. but when I run "Import Asset Number" nothing happens .. I mean, if I query the asset in the application, I can see it without the parent asset association.
Now, I'm trying to use the API's for EAM, but until now without success ...
I saw that there exist a "Technical Reference" document for EAM .. but I can't find it ...
Do you know from where I can download it ? ...
or, if the mentioned document does not exist anymore
Do you know where I can find documents about eAM Open Interface, more detailed than the information of the "Implementation Guide" ?
Thanks in advance,
Sergio MaestriDid the original poster ever find a resolution to this issue? I'm seeing the same behavior. I examined all of the documentation listed in the post already (though I can't find doc 256410.1).
In my example, my child asset is a rebuildable asset, but that won't always be the case. Even though I see that the Import Asset Genealogy request has run successfully, my record doesn't change. I should get an error as I'm deliberately trying to create a new parent-child relationship with a child that currently has a parent. This gives me an error message in the Maintenance Super User -> Asset -> Configuration History page.
Here's what I did to create the import record:
insert into MTL_OBJECT_GENEALOGY_INTERFACE
(INTERFACE_HEADER_ID, LAST_UPDATE_DATE, LAST_UPDATED_BY, CREATION_DATE, CREATED_BY, BATCH_ID, GROUP_ID, OBJECT_TYPE, PARENT_OBJECT_TYPE, GENEALOGY_ORIGIN, GENEALOGY_TYPE, PROCESS_STATUS, IMPORT_MODE,
ORGANIZATION_CODE, INVENTORY_ITEM_ID, SERIAL_NUMBER, PARENT_ORGANIZATION_CODE, PARENT_INVENTORY_ITEM_ID, PARENT_SERIAL_NUMBER, START_DATE_ACTIVE) VALUES
(MTL_OBJECT_GEN_INTERFACE_S.NEXTVAL, sysdate, 1068, sysdate, 1068, 100, 100, 2, 2, 3, 5, 'P', 0,
'EM1', 8319, 'Battery1000', 'EM1', 7885, 'FL1020', sysdate);
The only way I could get this to work was to set the MTL_OBJECT_GENEALOGY_INTERFACE.PROCESS_STATUS = 'R' and then call EAM_GENEALOGY_IMPORT_PUB.import_genealogy via PL/SQL. If I did that, I didn't get an error back from the PL/SQL call, but I did get a decent message in the ERROR_MESSAGE field of the interface table: "Child Battery1000 already has a parent FL1030 from 15-DEC-2006 10:43:50; the open period from 16-AUG-2013 15:55:52 overlaps with it."
The Parameters dialog for the Import Asset Genealogy request only works if PROCESS_STATUS = 'P' and the EAM API only works if PROCESS_STATUS = 'R'.
Is it me or does this seem poorly thought out or at the very least poorly documented? -
Liner Asset Management Implementation for Railway and Road Network.
Hi EAM Experts,
My client currently is using SAP modules including SAP PM but now for better asset management they want to implement LAM.
Please do guide me how to implement the LAM. Please specify with the config settings and the business cycle so that it will be helpful for me in mapping
the business requirement.
Your help required asap. Screen shots will be highly thankful.
This requirement is with my mutiple clients who is into Road and Railway networks.
Thanks
AnilDidier,
>So my question is what should we do to get the most accurate data for our
>asset and inventory in the case were deep freeze is running and reseting
>the system at every reboot....could you suggest a processs to make it more
>accurate.
Duplicate.
This post has been answered in the Asset Inventory Forum.
Jared Jennings - Data Technique, Inc.
Novell Support Forums Sysop
My Blog and Wiki with Tips, Tricks, and Tutorials
http://jaredjennings.org -
GRC 10 implementation approach
Hi All,
Am in the process of implementing GRC 10 with the following components for a pharma client.
Access Risk Analysis (ARA)
Access Request Management (ARM)
Emergency Access (Firefighter)
Business Role Management (BRM)
I just wanted to know your views on what kind of approach is better?. Please comment your views with your best approach.
My view is to first implement ARA and EAM together and then go ahead with ARM and BRM packed together.
Thank You for your idea.Hello Mani,
Apart from technical details provided by Madhu and Plaban,some more additional information
As per my understanding any successful implementation will follow the ASAP methodology,check the below link for information on ASAP methodology
Basic understanding on ASAP Methodology for beginners
You need to define resources and time line before start the project,check the below link
What is the ideal composition of an implementation team
also check the below threads which gives additional information
Implementation of GRC AC 10.1
GRC 10 implementation | SCN
While implementing if any issues Forum will help you.
All the best!!!
Regards
Baithi -
GRC 10 EAM - Unable to assign Firefighter roles to owners
Greetings SAP gurus,
I am currently on a new GRC 10 installation and having issues with the Emergency Access Management (EAM) component previously known as FireFighter or SPM. Note: We are trying to implement the Firefighter ''Role-Based" Approach.
Issue: We are unable to assign EAM roles to owners within NWBC. Click on 'Assign owners to Firefigher ID's and provision Firefighter ID's to firefighters' via the Access Management Tab within NWBC, option Superuser Assignment. Click on Assign. We are able to find the owners, but when I search for roles to assign, I get the error, 'No records found for the search criteria entered''.
We are on SP7.
Items completed:
1) All post installation tasks were completed correctly, i.e. BC sets activated, connector groups created and working.
2) EAM roles created on target system and imported via BRM.
3) EAM role properties edited for "Firefighting' usage in BRM, role owners defined, functional areas defined, business process and sub process areas defined.
4) Access control owners (i.e. role owners and controllers) defined.
5) The ID being used for configuration is currently assigned all GRC_NWBC roles available.
6) The connector groups are working fine and we are using for the Access risk Analysis component which is working fine.
7) The post EAM configuration steps has been completed.
Has anyone else experienced a similar issue? I look forward to your responses.
Rgds,
Prevlin MoodleyHello Prevlin,
Are you using a FF role owner for the assignment. This might be helpful:
[Note 1289579 - Firefighter Owner additional authorization for Role based FF|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1289579]
Cheers,
Diego. -
How to implement complex analysis authorizations in simple way
Hi All,
I need to create some analysis authorizations with long list of single values for a characteristics. For example, we have multiple set up of company codes (APAC, EAME, AMERICAS, etc) and each set contains 150 - 200 company codes in it. Now we have multiple combinations of company code set and geographies. In short, we will have multiple analysis authorizations and each will have one or two set of company codes and some geographies.
I can create the analysis authorizations for the first time, by putting individual values in the respective characteristics. That would be a big task but can be done. But the problem is about ongoing maintenance. In future, if a new company code is added to lets say APAC companies, then we will have to update all analysis authorizations which contains APAC company code and that would be huge number of AAs due to the complexity of business architecture.
Could anyone please suggest if it is possbile (and how) to do below or similar, or have any other better approach (using BW7.4)
- We would create a group (or set) of company codes. Lets say would create a group APAC_Comp_Code and add all APAC related company codes in it. This would be repeated for all set of compant codes.
- While creating analysis authorizatons, I would not assign any individual company code value in characteristic, instead put APA_Comp_Code inside the characteristic 0COMP_CODE.
- If I need to put multiple set of company codes inside 0COMP_CODE, I will just put the corresponding group name, not the invidual values.
The benefit would be that in future if I need to add a new company code to APAC, I would just have to update this group APAC_Comp_Code. I will not have to maintain the analysis authorizations.
Please let me know if this is possible or if there is any other way to implement the requirement with simpler maintenance.
Thanks
Nitesh GuptaHi Nitesh,
From what you describe, this would be a good case to use variables in your analysis authorisations. You can specify a variable value for the BUKRS field and have a couple of options to populate the values which are picked up in the query execution.
You will need to ensure that you activate the istep to read customer exit variables and have the query variable set as customer-exit. Once those are complete, you can create a custom table to maintain the mapping of groups to company codes, or to read the company codes directly from your ERP system (if you want to base authorisations on what the users can see in ERP) and populate the table with those values.
However you populate the value to the variable, I think this approach will get you closer to minimal maintenance going forward. Enhancement RSR00001 should be implemented, some help documentation for this below
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/1d/ca10d858c2e949ba4a152c44f8128a/content.htm
Hope this helps,
Tom -
Error in patch 4908368 for EAM
Hi All,
we try to implement patch 4908368 to our 11.5.10.2 system for our maintenance acitivites.
But the patch has given an error.
In adpatch.log file :
About to attempt instantiating the current-view snapshot: Sun Jun 27 2010 20:26:27
Attempting to instantiate the current-view snapshot...
ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
ORA-06512: at "APPS.AD_FILE_SYS_SNAPSHOTS_PKG", line 2472
ORA-06512: at line 2
AutoPatch error:
Error while executing statement (curr-vw inst)
Error calling adusnapInstCurrVwSnapshot(apps,11.5.10.2).
Error calling adphistLoadPtchHistFromFStoDB2
STOP_TASK: [Upload Patch History information from filesystem] [] [Sun Jun 27 2010 20:30:23]
In adwork001.log file:
AD Worker error:
The above program failed with error code 1.
See the AD Worker log file and/or the program log file for details.
Time when worker failed: Sun Jun 27 2010 21:09:41
Evaluating symbolic arguments ....
Done evaluating symbolic arguments.
Time when worker started job: Sun Jun 27 2010 21:09:41
Start time for file is: Sun Jun 27 2010 21:09:41
/u01/VIS/visappl/fnd/11.5.0/bin/FNDLOAD &ui_apps 0 Y UPLOAD @FND:patch/115/import/afsload.lct @EAM:patch/115/import/US/eammain.ldt
APP-FND-00124: Concurrent Manager cannot open your concurrent request's output file /u01/VIS/visappl/admin/VIS/out/o2749804.out in append mode.
Check that the person who started the concurrent manager has privileges to create and write to files in the concurrent program's log directory. Contact your system administrator to obtain create and write privileges. (ROUTINE=AFPCRF)
AD Worker error:
The above program failed with error code 1.
See the AD Worker log file and/or the program log file for details.
Time when worker failed: Sun Jun 27 2010 21:09:42
Please help.
Thank you.
Edited by: ehafizoglu on Jun 29, 2010 11:13 AMHi again;
You can also check below note which seems similar error like yours
APP-FND-00080: Routine AFPCRF Cannot Construct the Name of Your Concurrent Request Log File Running Concurrent Program in Applications [ID 169091.1]
Did you try to run adctrl utulity and restart worker? If no please follow:
1. login as applmgr user
2. source env file
3. adctrl
4. First check 1. Show worker status than 2. Tell worker to restart a failed job
also be sure your applmgr user has w/r permission for /u01/VIS/visappl/admin/VIS/out path
Regard
Helios -
GRC10 - EAM - Transaction Code GRAC_SPM opening remote logon screen
Gurus,
We are on SAP EHP 2 for SAP NetWeaver 7.0 and Plugin patch level 007. Have configured EAM.
IN AC system Firefighter executes transaction code GRAC_SPM.Firefighter selects FFID, enters reason code ,details and clicks logon. The next screen is asking autnentication of target system (Remote Logon screen in SM59) .Please can you suggest if this issue is related to RFC or configuration.
Thanks
ARD
Edited by: ARD on Feb 21, 2012 8:56 PMHi,
Are you on SP06? If so, and you are sure that the RFC connections have been set up correctly, as well as all the SPM related configuration at both the GRC and plug-in systems (SPM ID = Service type, SPRO etc), you probably need to consider implementing the following SAP note https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1652880.
This fixed a similar issue I had when we moved to SP06. I understand that this note is delivered as part of SP07 now.
Hope that helps. -
GRC EAM Authorizations: Few Anomalies in Standard Roles
Hi GRC/ Security Experts,
To brief you quickly, we have an SAP GRC AC 10 SP13 about to be deployed with ARA & EAM Modules as a first phase deployment.
All of the functionality is almost setup, just refining few things before going live.
About the GRC Authorizations, I observed few anomalies in the standard delivered SAP Roles for EAM.
I am aware that processes & compliance's, can vary from organization to organization. I am trying to redesign some of the EAM related authorizations, especially for Firefighter Owner/Controller.
In the standard delivered EAM roles, there are few things missing and few unnecessarily attached.
I am already aware of the provided information in the following resources:
- 1730649 - Firefighter owner can assign ANY Firefighter ID to Firefighter User
- 1663949 - EAM: Authorization Fixes for Central Owners and Reason Codes and have referred to EAM Authorization
- EAM Authorization Concepts & Guide
- GRC AC Latest Security Guide.
I am wondering, many of GRC AC 10 implementations must have gone live by now, and how can be the following authorization hardening concerns be addressed.
I observed the following anomalies, and used ST01 tracing to refine and address few of them still some of them I cant seem to get hold of:
1) [SOLVED] EAM Owners should technically not be allowed to Create/Maintain Reason Codes, that should be EAM Administrator's task. This was addressed by adjusting the auth objects from Owner's Role and only Reason Codes Display was provisioned to the owner's, hence this is addressed.
2) [SOLVED] EAM Owners should not be allowed to Create/Maintain EAM Controllers. This is a grey controversy I believe, as in my organization EAM Controller is treated on even Higher Scale than Owner and thus EAM Controller maintenance should only be done by the EAM admin rather than EAM Owner. This also I have addressed by adjusting few auth objects, which leaves the EAM Owners with Display only access of EAM Controllers.
3) [UNSOLVED] EAM Owner is able to assign any Firefighter ID to End-User: This is anomaly as per me, and is also specified in notes 1730649 & 1663949, but I find it hard to figure out the real solution of that specific issue. The notes just point to EAM Authorization Guide, which explain the GRC Authorization concept in general, which I of course get it. The GRC SP13 is already higher than the one applicable for the issue.
Technically EAM Owner should only be able ASSIGN the FF IDs that are Owned by him, this I cant seem to figure out how exactly.
I have gone through the Authorization Guide, Security Guide, Played too much with System Trace ST01 trying to redesign the authorizations. How would you have done it? This wasn't there in Virsa earlier, it used to bug you back saying that FF ID is not owned by you.
4) [UNSOLVED] Similarly like above, EAM Owner is able to modify assignments/delete assignments of any FF ID. This is of course cascaded from the above issue. I believe it doesn't has to be like this, EAM Owner should only be able to access/modify/maintain the FF IDs owned. Maintenance of the FF IDs not owned by EAM Owner should be truly abstained.
5) EAM Owners should not be able to Add/Delete the Assignments of Owner with FF ID. This is the starting point of the Firefighter Structure and must be restricted to EAM Administrator. In the Standard EAM Owner role, an EAM Owner can created another OWner, assign a FF ID to another Owner, Delete a Owner-FF ID assignment. EAM Owner should have display only access as far as it is concerned about the EAM Owners access Area. This one I have yet to test, which I think would be possible. Can't get hold of points 3 & 4.
I have already studied/implemented the suggestions/recommendations/corrections from Authorization Guide.
But i still feel that these are few loopholes and must be closed before I conclude the implementation.
What do you think?
Would truly appreciate, if you can point out the objects and values that can help to address the open issues.
Apologies, for such a lengthy post, but the authorization goes deep here I guess and ST01 isn't helping me anymore to get over this.
Regards,
AkshayHi Colleen,
Thanks for your reply, I was sure I will be getting first response from you, as you are really proactive in GRC Space.
W.r.t. your suggestions:
1) I am not able to follow what you mean by "Are you able to try debugging "CALL METHOD cl_grac_auth_engine=>authority_check" ?? I am not much of a ABAPper/DEBUGGer, but if you can point what exactly is to be done/or to be get done I wouldn't mind getting my hands dirty at this too.
Correct me if I am wrong, do you imply that, even though the specified correction in note is available in system (SP13), still this inbuilt authority check is not happening and is being bypassed?
2) I checked the EAM Authorization Guide for Auth Object GRAC_USER.
With what you feel in the below message of yours=>
Starting to wonder if it is as the EAM Guide attached to the above notes mentions authorisation GRAC_USER which contains a field for user (quote from guide below).
User ID : This Field Specifies which firefighter users you can Display and Perform other activities based on the Activity Field .
That suggests you need different roles to restrict owners? I would have thought SAP would differentiate between authorisation to maintain FF as and Administrator versus Owner allow access to their Ids.
I would have thought Administrator would get the GRAC* authorisations whilst Owners would obtain access via owner setup (mapping for FF Id)
I went back to the EAM Guide and tried to put it all together to make sense.
With my below observations, I think too that there is no such thing as mapping of FF ID with the Owner, out of the Box in GRC AC 10 so that Owner is able to access only the FF IDs owned.
So, if that would be true, then to achieve this sort of wish, I would have to have separate roles from each EAM Owner specifying, the FF IDs that particular EAM Owner is able to access. And then there would be n number of Roles for n number of Owners, which is subject to change and has to be maintained again. Then also, the FF ID owned could also be added/removed etc, Whoa! That wouldn't make me far away from rationalizing the whole objective.
I just wonder, if this is actually Ok? If there is no approach to this, would it be OK to let any EAM Owner work with any FF ID subject to their own desire.
Anyways, check this out below , I will sideways open a message with SAP just to have my closure.
From EAM Authorizations Guide in the note=>
Now from the EAM Owner's Role=>
This no where mentions of Restricting the FF IDs in the Role, if at all this concept exists, it would be through some internal check like the one above i.e. CALL METHOD cl_grac_auth_engine=>authority_check or something.
Also, found these few specifications as well, which affirms the same I believe.
Much thanks for your effort and patience.
Regards,
Akshay -
Wireless Telco specifics for SAP implementation
1) Are there any key considerations and industry specifics for a wireless telco company for the Chart of Accounts, Asset Structure, Material/Service Master and Plant Maintenance u2013 BOM?
2) Are there any Wireless Telco industry specifics that we have to watch out for, eg. revenue recognition for prepaid cards, treatment of AUCs for Network Assets, etc.
We are implementing SAP ECC 5.0, FI-GL, FI-AP, FI-AA, FI-AR, MM-PU, MM-IM, MM-SD, EAM-PM and EAM-PS.
Thank youHi Vinit
From Pharma Perspective , the solution in SAP should have below things
1. As Already mentioned Batch Management is Key. I would like to add along with batch management , the batch release process along with certificates related to Batches plays a key role.
2. Generally in pharma we have Make to order process , so it would be good to know about standard MTO flow .
3. Another key aspect is Subcontracting process. Each Pharma company has its own subcontracting process defined but its one of the critical processes in Pharma industry.
4. Planning with MRP also is important from the system set up .
Hope this helps
Regards
Swapnil
Maybe you are looking for
-
Why can't I install Photoshop Elements 8 on my computer?
I currently have Windows 7 - I purchased Adobe Photoshop Elements 8 at Best Buy over a week ago and still can't install the software. I've contacted Adobe Support more than once. My experience has been HORRIBLE. 1. I went online and verified th
-
Can't download applications (poss due to hard drive space issue)?
Hi there, I'm having major hard drive issues with my MacBook Pro OS X 10.4.11 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 4GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM laptop. I use it for video editing and also keep music on it. However for the video editing I use an external hard drive, tho
-
Shape selection operation is not recorded when recording a macro
Hi frinds in Word 2013, via "record macro" tools, i am writing a macro which performs the following tasks for me: 1- when i select a word, it changes the font size & color & cuts the word 2-inserts a quick part object called "MyRectangle" in the loca
-
I don't have the extract option in my version of Dreamweaver CC 2014 for Mac
I just installed Dreamweaver CC 2014 for Mac it and I don't have the "Extract" option anywhere. It doesn't appear in the Window menu, and pressing cmd+K doesn't do anything. Any ideas??
-
Image Distortion on one computer but not the other?!?
I have been using Fireworks CS5 for the past year making a slideshow for our website however this time it is giving me problems. I created the slideshow same always by resizing my images and optomizing them before loading them into Fireworks. From th