ECATT issue in Tcode MIGO- High priority

Hi ,
We are facing an issue in eCATT for Tcode MIGO in MM.
Everything went on well earlier. All of a sudden an error occurs as"Programming error. Data already aggregated". I asked my MM guy to check with his data. he says the MIGO is fine when ran independantly as aTcode. Thi serror occurs only while running thro' eCATTs. I would request someone to respond on this ASAP as we are stating our UAT today.
Sudha

Hi Sudha,
Even I am getting exactly the same error while running the script in Ecatt for the Tcode - MIGO.
(Error : Proramming error : Data already aggregated)
How did you resolve the error? Please help me in solving this error.
Regards,
Sachin Maheshwari
9881154030

Similar Messages

Reg: Issues in Tcode: MIGO

Hi,
Can anyone suggest me tht, as per client requirement, they need T.code :MIGO had to be Customised and they need range between G/L number(eg: From:50000076, To: 50000094), we can able to customize tht t.code or any other transaction code to do tht....
Can u anyone revert me back....
Thanks &Regards
Karthick
Edited by: Vasanth Karthick on Aug 23, 2010 2:13 PM

Can you please specify the requirement in more elaborate way?

Goods receipt - MIGO (high priority)

in MIGO , there is an error " enter valid gate entry no.".
in OMJX i have make this field BKTXT field optional.though there is an error.error also specifies " enter gate entry no in delievery note".I also hide the (In OMJX) field LFSNR.Though there is an error.
the error " application 00 no. 398" . I m not able to switch off the message also.
suggest me.

Hi,
Inform your ABAPer to check this.
If he used any Userexit in MIGO to enter the Gate enty no while processing the GR.
He might have give this message in the userexit if anybody fails to enter the Gate entry no system should not process the Goods reciept.
One more thing if your process is like to enter the gate entry no mandatory in delivery note field of MIGO then why you are not entering in MIGO.
If the message is disturbing your daily activites and this has no importance you inform your ABAPer to remove or modified as warning or information message so that you can proceed.
rgds
Chidanand

Tcode MIGO

Hello All,
Could someone let me know what all kind of transactions can we do by tcode MIGO and in real scenario mainly for what purpose is MIGO used for. I know it is used for goods receipt. But I am confused about one thing, I saw many options there like goods receipt and goods issue. But I also saw inbound delivery, outbound delivery, purchase order and others also. This is not clear to me.
Could someone direct me to breif note or some help and In short can let me know the basic functionality of this tcode.
Thanks,
Mark

hi
good
go through this links
http://purchasing.mpls.k12.mn.us/sites/725fb275-2139-4882-87c5-69b708b1eef9/uploads/SAP_TIPS__May_1_2006_.doc
This is the list of user exits for the transaction code MIGO.
MBCF0002 Customer function exit: Segment text in material doc. item
MBCF0005 Material document item for goods receipt/issue slip
MBCF0006 Customer function for WBS element
MBCF0007 Customer function exit: Updating a reservation
MBCF0009 Filling the storage location field
MBCF0010 Customer exit: Create reservation BAPI_RESERVATION_CREATE1
MBCF0011 Read From RESB and RKPF For Print List in MB26
MBCFC003 Maintenance of batch master data for goods movements
MBCFC004 Maintenance of batch specifications for goods movements
thanks
mrutyun^

Listing Items based on criteria e.g. High Priority Items First.

Hi,
One of our customers have a need to List High Priority Items first on the WebTools site.
Let's take two ItemCodes for example: Printer001, and, Monitor001.
>> If these two items are included in the same category then Monitor001 will appear before Printer001 as WebTools sorts in alphabetic ascending order;
>> But, our customer wants Printer001 to appear before Monitor001 as it is an Item higher in priority that Printer001.
I can think of two possible solutions:
1/2) Prefix Items with a number or letter to have it appear first in the WebTools default sort order. E.g. Rename "Monitor001" as "AMonitor001". This will not be possible for existing Items in SAP, so it doen't solve the issue,
Or,
2/2) Customize the Default WebTools Item List block to sort Items based on a User Define field called "pririty". Which might require a lot of effort.
Please advise if anyone else has solved similar issue and how.
Thanks very much for your replies in advance.

Hey Kafil ... I think you may be stuck modifying the parts list page or creating something from scratch. I'm not aware of an easy way to do this out of the box.

High priority bug to be solved very urgent

Hello Experts,
I need your help and plz close this topic once its solved.
Here is the problem:
There is report called "Material Group".When its is displayed for material gorup say "GB06010000" is displayed as part of report data wheras the source system (oracle ) does not have this item any more in the catalog. This indicated that data is not refreshed for quite a long time.
This report is connected to the third party application (oracle db) not EBP system(r/3). Time to time there has been deletion or addition catalog items and in all as of today there are 815 items, whereas BIW report displays 4204 items. How can i refresh this data to display 815 items.
how to solve this issue any ideas or suggestion????
the reports is on ODS level.
I hope all of u take this problem as urs and try to give me solution as earliest possible.
<b>this is high priority issue from client side</b>.
thanks in advance . Surely il assign the points.
email id: [email protected]
Urs,
Raki.

Hey Lilly,
Yep i have deleted the contents of ODS sucessfully and i have reloaded it sucesfully but from biw side there is no problem as i feel.
So i requested my onsite people to look in to the oracle db table how many records are available.Later then we will make take some decision .
So still the problem isnot solved il be updating this in another couple of days.So i request u to take care this issue and now i have assigned u points also.
Thanks for ur info.
Possible give me ur personal mail id so that i can direclty drop to ur mail.
Urs,
Raki

Insertion of field to tcode MIGO

Hi,
I want to insert Issue date for TCode MIGO which is using structure GOHEAD. Please tell me how to do so??
Thanks n Regards

Hi,
GO to SHDB transaction and record BDC codings for MIGO
Regards
Divakar

Is it possible in IOS to have two static routes for the same subnet, one a higher priority and "failover" between the 2?

Hi All
Is it possible in IOS to have for a particular subnet:
a) Two static routes?
b) Make one static route a higher priority than the other?
c) If one static router "goes down", failover to the lower priority static route?
We have a l2tp/vpdn connection to a supplier which can be accessed via two vlans/routes. I would like to make one route the preferred one but the "route" to failover if the preferred route goes down.
Again, many thanks in advance for all responses!
Thanks
John

Hi John,
Hope the below explaination will help you...
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
If you notice the Administrative Distance for the secondary route pointing to ISP2 is increased to 10 so that it becomes the backup link.
The above configuration with just two floating static routes partially accomplishes our requirement as it will work only in the scenario where the routers interfaces connected to the WAN link are in up/down or down/down status. But in a lot of situations we see that even though the links remain up but we are not able to reach the gateway, this usually happens when the issue is at the ISP side.
In such scenarios, IP SLAs becomes an engineer's best friend. With around six additional IOS commands we can have a more reliable automatic failover environment.
Using IP SLA the Cisco IOS gets the ability to use Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) pings to identify when a WAN link goes down at the remote end and hence allows the initiation of a backup connection from an alternative port. The Reliable Static Routing Backup using Object Tracking feature can ensure reliable backup in the case of several catastrophic events, such as Internet circuit failure or peer device failure.
IP SLA is configured to ping a target, such as a publicly routable IP address or a target inside the corporate network or your next-hop IP on the ISP's router. The pings are routed from the primary interface only. Following a sample configuration of IP SLA to generate icmp ping targeted at the ISP1s next-hop IP.
R1(config)# ip sla 1
R1(config)# icmp-echo 2.2.2.2 source-interface FastEthernet0/0
R1(config)# timeout 1000
R1(config)# threshold 2
R1(config)# frequency 3
R1(config)# ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
The above configuration defines and starts an IP SLA probe.
The ICMP Echo probe sends an ICMP Echo packet to next-hop IP 2.2.2.2 every 3 seconds, as defined by the “frequency” parameter.
Timeout sets the amount of time (in milliseconds) for which the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation waits for a response from its request packet.
Threshold sets the rising threshold that generates a reaction event and stores history information for the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation.
After defining the IP SLA operation our next step is to define an object that tracks the SLA probe. This can be accomplished by using the IOS Track Object as shown below:
R1(config)# track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
The above command will track the state of the IP SLA operation. If there are no ping responses from the next-hop IP the track will go down and it will come up when the ip sla operation starts receiving ping response.
To verify the track status use the use the “show track” command as shown below:
R1# show track
Track 1
IP SLA 1 reachability
Reachability is Down
1 change, last change 00:03:19
Latest operation return code: Unknown
The above output shows that the track status is down. Every IP SLAs operation maintains an operation return-code value. This return code is interpreted by the tracking process. The return code may return OK, OverThreshold, and several other return codes.
Different operations may have different return-code values, so only values common to all operation types are used. The below table shows the track states as per the IP SLA return code.
Tracking
Return Code
Track State
Reachability
OK or over threshold
(all other return codes)
Up
Down
The Last step in the IP SLA Reliable Static Route configuration is to add the “track” statement to the default routes pointing to the ISP routers as shown below:
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2 track 1
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
The track number keyword and argument combination specifies that the static route will be installed only if the state of the configured track object is up. Hence if the track status is down the secondary route will be used to forward all the traffic.
Please rate the helpfull posts.
Regards,
Naidu.

How can I give the "user interface thread" higher priority?

We do alot of activex calls to front panels. We need to increase/decrease the priority of the user interface thread to resolve our thread problem. Anyone know how to do this?
Chuck

Hello,
As P.M. was saying, you can adjust the thread priorities
through the VI Properties dialogue.
Another place to modify the multithreading system in LabVIEW is a VI
located at: [LabVIEW Directory]\vi.lib\Utility\sysinfo.llb\threadconfig.vi. However I do not think this will remedy any
problems you are having.
From a Multithreading in LabVIEW tutorial (http://zone.ni.com/devzone/conceptd.nsf/webmain/d2e196c7416f373a862568690074c759)
Priorities in the User Interface and
Single-Threaded Applications
Within the User Interface execution
system, priority levels are handled in the same way for single-threaded and
multithreaded applications.
In single-threaded applications and
in the User Interface execution system of multithreaded applications, the
execution system queue has multiple entry points. The execution system places
higher priority VIs on the queue in front of lower priority VIs.
If a high-priority task is running and the queue contains only lower priority
tasks, the high-priority VI continues to run. For example, if the execution
queue contains two VIs of each priority level, the time-critical VIs share execution time exclusively until both finish.
Then, the high priority VIs share execution
time exclusively until both finish, and so on. However, if the higher priority
VIs call a function that waits, the execution system removes higher priority
VIs from the queue until the wait or I/O completes, assigning other tasks
(possibly with lower priority) to run. When the wait or I/O completes, the
execution system reinserts the pending task on the queue in front of lower
priority tasks. Refer to the Synchronous/Blocking Nodes section for a list of
asynchronous functions that wait.
Also, if a high priority VI calls a lower priority subVI,
that subVI is raised to the same priority level as the caller for the duration
of that call. Consequently, you do not need to modify the priority levels of
the subVIs that a VI calls to raise the priority level of the subVI.
Thus changing the priority of your VI will change the
priority of UI calls for that particular VI.
Again, I caution you because I suspect that if you are having problems
with your application not running correctly, I do not believe that manipulating
the thread priorities will resolve these issues.
Hope this helps,
Travis M
LabVIEW R&D
National Instruments

Create at runtime a job to run at the central instance with high priority

Hi All
Using the function modules ( job_open, job_submit and job_close ) or ( job_open, submit via job jobname number jobcount, job_close) I need that this job runs in the central instance and with high priority.
I would like to know how to inform it using the statements above? How to pass the parameters to make the job run in the central instance with high priority?
I would appreciate any help.
Thanks in advance.
João Gaia

Hi
I hadn't realized about the parameter TARGETSERVER of the function module JOBCLOSE. I am going to make some tests.
thanks in advance

Getting dump while posting goods receipt through TCode migo

Hi,
I am getting dump after I click on post button in TCode 'MIGO'.
Short text
    The current application triggered a termination with a short dump.
Short text of error message:
Document number 9 5000000000 2010 was already assigned
Long text of error message:
Diagnosis
      Document number 5000000000 in company code 9 and fiscal year 2010
      has already been assigned.
System Response
      Termination of processing.
Procedure
      Check document number range 50 in company code 9 and fiscal year
      2010 and correct the number range status if necessary.
Technical information about the message:
Message class....... "F5"
Number.............. 152
Variable 1.......... 9
Variable 2.......... 5000000000
Variable 3.......... 2010
Variable 4.......... 50
So please help me what I can do?
Thanks,
Moderator Message: The short dump is self-explanatory.
Edited by: kishan P on Nov 18, 2010 11:17 AM

Hi,
plx try to chane the status in IE02
Go to edit ,manual options , in that delete the HU assignemtn
and then save it and come out of it ..
Hope that helps

How to send mail to vendor mail id from Tcode MIGO when GR is created

Hi Experts,
My requirement is to send one mail to vendor when GR is created in Tcode MIGO.
I tried to setup configuration in tcode NACE, creating new message type MAL1. but i am not able to locate Message tab in tcode MIGO, also, When i goto transaction MB02 i can give message type MAL1 in output types then mail is going to scot, but my main problem is as:
Output type MAL1 is not automacially trigerred from transaction MIGO (I need to go to MB02 and add output type in Messages)
Please help me to configure this. Again, i did configuration only in NACE and not any other tcode. So please tell me whether i need to configure in other tcodes specifcally WE20 (if yes, please give me message type and process code for GR) .
Many thanks, please help me. points assured!
Thanking you,
Jogdand M B

Hi,
Via t-code NACE select inventory management, then you can use output type WE01 or MLGR base on transmission medium -- 5 External send. After that you need to maintain the condition record accordingly, then that will be ok! After GR with MIGO, system will generate a email to vendor's mailbox in the vendor master data!
Good luck
Tao

Tcode MIGO Background Job Not working

Hi All,
I am facing problem in TCode : MIGO for Background JOB of BDC Program with below details,
CALL_TRANSACTION MIGO returncode: 1,001 RECORD:          0
MIGO                 017 S
The front end is not suitable for the transaction (see long text)
DC                   006 S
Control Framework: Fatal error - GUI cannot be reached
00                   341 A
Runtime error RAISE_EXCEPTION has occurred
Please let me know above error what needs to be done.
Thanks in Advance,
Mahesh Devershetty

I am facing the same problem while calling MIGO from RFC
CALL_TRANSACTION MIGO returncode: 1,001 RECORD: 0
MIGO 017 S
The front end is not suitable for the transaction (see long text)
DC 006 S
Control Framework: Fatal error - GUI cannot be reached
00 341 A
Runtime error RAISE_EXCEPTION has occurred
BDCMSGCOLL Returns the following :
TCODE                   MIGO
DYNAME               SAPLMIGO
DYNUMB               0001
MSGTYP               A
MSGSPRA            E
MSGID                  00
MSGNR                341
MSGV1                RAISE_EXCEPTION
please help me as soon as possible
giving thanks in advance
goutam roy

Why is time-critical thread not interrupting sleepless high priority thread?

Hello,
I have two threads running in the same execution system on a real-time PXI platform. The time-critical thread sleeps using "AI Single Scan.VI", and acquires my data at a rate of 8000 Hz.
I have a slower high priority process that calls a DLL function to calculate some filter coefficients. This function call takes longer than 1/8000 s to complete, and runs in a loop, executing as often as it can (with new data from FIFOs).
I expected the time-critical thread to interrupt the the high priority thread without problem.
I am finding that unless I insert a LabVIEW delay (for example a wait for x ms VI) in the loop, the real-time system stops responding. With a small delay (ie 1 ms), t
he acquisition completes, and a FIFO shuts down the loop of the slow process.
Why do I need a labVIEW delay in the high-priority loop, when the DLL function call itself is quite slow? Even without a DLL call, I would expect the time-critical VI to interrupt, finish its data acquisition, and shut-down the high-priority thread using its FIFO.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Frenk

Here are a couple things to try/check:
1) Check the call library node in your high priority VI. If it's orange (runs in UI thread), your high priority VI is actually switching to the UI thread every time your dll runs. That alone is not a problem. But if your TC VI tries to update any control terminals, the TC thread will switch over to the UI thread to access UI resources, possibly while the dll within your high priority VI has a lock on those resources. Why does the dll have a lock on UI resources? Because it was running in the UI thread and got interrupted by the TC thread before it finished doing its business. Not likely, but possible.
2) There's another possible reason you're seeing this behavior. If the TC VI and the high VI call a mutual subVI, the subVI will be elevated to ALWAYS run in the highest priority thread irrespective of the actual caller (in your case, it's the the TC thread). Even when the *high priority VI* calls the mutual subVI, that subVI runs in the time-critical thread, which means there's a thread switch from high to TC, then back to high after the subVI finishes. And because high and TC VIs are in the same exec system, that mutual subVI will always run in the 1 and only TC thread alotted to that exec system.
So, while your TC VI is running, you're in the TC thread. While, your high VI is running, you're in a high non-TC thread, and when your high VI calls the mutual subVI, you're again in the TC thread until the subVI finishes.
So how could this arrangement cause your TC VI to become starved by the high VI? If your TC VI wakes up while the high VI is in the middle of running the mutual subVI, the TC thread responsible for running the TC VI is actually busy (in the middle of running the subVI in your high VI!!!), so the TC thread cannot run your TC VI until it finishes running that mutual subVI.
The fix: make your TC VI run in a different exec system. It will be given its own TC thread that no one else can mess with. When TC VI wakes up, it's guaranteed a TC thread.
I think there's a good reason behind why a mutual subVI ALWAYs runs at the highest priority of all its callers, irrespective of the actual caller's priority...but I can't think of the reason at the moment.

ABAP dump while running the tcode MIGO

Hi All,
I am getting the abap dump while running the tcode MIGO when I searched I got two relevant sap notes but our functional team said that its not applicable in our case.
Please find the details of ST22 analysis-:
Runtime Errors         MESSAGE_TYPE_X
Date and Time          17.04.2009 13:18:45
Short text
     The current application triggered a termination with a short dump.
What happened?
     The current application program detected a situation which really
     should not occur. Therefore, a termination with a short dump was
     triggered on purpose by the key word MESSAGE (type X).
Error analysis
    Short text of error message:
    No RFC destination is defined for SAP Global Trade Services
    Long text of error message:
    Technical information about the message:
    Message class....... "/SAPSLL/PLUGINR3"
    Number.............. 002
    Variable 1.......... " "
    Variable 2.......... " "
    Variable 3.......... " "
    Variable 4.......... " "
How to correct the error
    Probably the only way to eliminate the error is to correct the program.
    If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
    find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
    If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
    keywords:
    "MESSAGE_TYPE_X" " "
    "SAPLMBWL" or "LMBWLU21"
    "MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENT"
SAP Notes i have reffered 1098491, 1041122
Currently we are running on SAP_APPL     600     0007     SAPKH60007
Regards,
Prashant

Hi Rohit,
This particular note is valid for
Support
Packages Release Package
Name
PI 2004_1_46B SAPKIPZI38
PI 2004_1_46C SAPKIPZI48
PI 2004_1_470 SAPKIPZI58
PI 2004_1_500 SAPKIPZI68
Our system is running on PI_BASIS     2006_1_700     0005     SAPKIPYM05
Pls suggest.
Regards,
Prashant

ECATT issue in Tcode MIGO- High priority

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for